Research Article| January 01, 2005 Fossil protists and fungi in amber and rock substrates Carmen Ascaso; Carmen Ascaso 1Centro de Ciencias Medioambientales, CSIC, Serrano 115 bis, 28006 Madrid, Spain, email: ascaso@ccma.csic.es Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Jacek Wierzchos; Jacek Wierzchos 2Servicio de Microscopía Electrónica, Universidad de Lleida, Rovira Roure 44, 25198 Lleida, Spain Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Mariela Speranza; Mariela Speranza 3Laboratorio de Micologia, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Julio Herrera y Reissig 565, 11400 Montevideo, Uruguay Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Juan Carlos Gutiérrez; Juan Carlos Gutiérrez 4Departamento de Microbiologia III, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Ana Martín González; Ana Martín González 4Departamento de Microbiologia III, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Asuncion de los Ríos; Asuncion de los Ríos 1Centro de Ciencias Medioambientales, CSIC, Serrano 115 bis, 28006 Madrid, Spain, email: ascaso@ccma.csic.es Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Jesús Alonso Jesús Alonso 5Museo de Ciencias Naturales de Álava, C/ Siervas de Jesús 24, 01001 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Micropaleontology (2005) 51 (1): 59–72. https://doi.org/10.2113/51.1.59 Article history received: 03 Jan 2004 accepted: 11 Mar 2005 first online: 03 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Carmen Ascaso, Jacek Wierzchos, Mariela Speranza, Juan Carlos Gutiérrez, Ana Martín González, Asuncion de los Ríos, Jesús Alonso; Fossil protists and fungi in amber and rock substrates. Micropaleontology 2005;; 51 (1): 59–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/51.1.59 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentBy SocietyMicropaleontology Search Advanced Search Abstract The present study was designed to gain insight into the protists and fungi that made up the microbiota in the past, fossilized in two different substrates: amber and sandstone. The amber, dated as Lower Cretaceous, was from Álava in northern Spain, while fossil-bearing sandstone rocks were collected from the Linnaeus terrace and Mount Fleming regions of Antarctica. When examining this type of inclusion in hard substrates, it first has to be established whether the microorganism is mummified or only partially mineralized. In the latter case, some of the organism’s autofluorescence may be preserved. In our amber samples, light microscopy revealed a very well preserved microcenosis in what must have been a semiaquatic habitat comprised of several types of protozoa including Amoeba, Paramecium and Astasia (Euglena), Amebas limax and the colpodid ciliate Pseudoplatyophrya nana, as well as an abundant fossilized mycelium. The SEM-BSE procedure provided us with ultrastructural details of the fungi and protozoa, especially amoebae and flagellates. In the sandstone samples from Linnaeus terrace, it was possible to identify presumptive diatoms. Ultrastructural details were well-preserved in a fossil Trebouxia-type microalga from Mount Flemming, including the inner chloroplast area normally occupied by the pyrenoid. This fossilized microalga was shown by energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) to contain high Si levels in the pyrenoid zone, and high Fe levels in the area corresponding to the chloroplast periphery, peripheric cytoplasm and cell wall. In sandstone from Linnaeus Terrace, fossilized algae showed no central core containing Si, and the entire cell appeared to be completely filled with Al, K and Fe, with Fe most intensely observed within the algal wall.The present observations suggest that a well-preserved cell ultrastructure is the best criterion of biogenicity. You do not currently have access to this article.