Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Research Articles

Online awareness is associated with superior performance on assessments of functional cognition.

Intact awareness facilitates an individual's adoption of strategies to support community living skills. However, most studies have not examined awareness during ongoing complex task performance. Objective: To examine whether community-dwelling adult's Accuracy and Strategy use on the Weekly Calendar Planning Activity 17-item version (WCPA-17), Total Cues on the Performance Assessment of Self-care Skills Checkbook Balancing and Shopping Task (PCST), and scores on the self-report Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADCS-ADL) differ between groups who do and do not demonstrate awareness of performance difficulties on the WCPA-17. Using data collected as part of a larger study we performed a cross-sectional analysis of 274 community-dwelling adults aged 55 to 93 years. Two methods classified participants into groups aware or unaware of their performance. Independent sample t-tests examined group differences on four dependent variables: Accuracy and Strategy use on the WCPA-17, PCST Total Cues, and score on the ADCS-ADL. Using one classification method, aware individuals showed superior Accuracy (p < 0.001), used more Strategies (p = 0.002), needed fewer PCST Total Cues (p < 0.001), and reported greater independence on the ADCS-ADL (p < 0.004), similar trends were observed with the other method in Accuracy (p < 0.001) and PCST Total Cues (p < 0.001) but Strategy use and ADCS-ADL differences failed to reach significance after Bonferroni correction. Groups categorized as aware performed better on all measures. Intact awareness is critical to performance on complex everyday activities and can be evaluated with functional cognition assessments.

Pick a PACC: Comparing domain-specific and general cognitive composites in Alzheimer disease research.

We aimed to illustrate how complex cognitive data can be used to create domain-specific and general cognitive composites relevant to Alzheimer disease research. Using equipercentile equating, we combined data from the Charles F. and Joanne Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center that spanned multiple iterations of the Uniform Data Set. Exploratory factor analyses revealed four domain-specific composites representing episodic memory, semantic memory, working memory, and attention/processing speed. The previously defined preclinical Alzheimer disease cognitive composite (PACC) and a novel alternative, the Knight-PACC, were also computed alongside a global composite comprising all available tests. These three composites allowed us to compare the usefulness of domain and general composites in the context of predicting common Alzheimer disease biomarkers. General composites slightly outperformed domain-specific metrics in predicting imaging-derived amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration burden. Power analyses revealed that the global, Knight-PACC, and attention and processing speed composites would require the smallest sample sizes to detect cognitive change in a clinical trial, while the Alzheimer Disease Cooperative Study-PACC required two to three times as many participants. Analyses of cognition with the Knight-PACC and our domain-specific composites offer researchers flexibility by providing validated outcome assessments that can equate across test versions to answer a wide range of questions regarding cognitive decline in normal aging and neurodegenerative disease. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Study Partner Type and Adverse Event Reporting in Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials.

In randomized clinical trials (RCTs), monitoring adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) is critical. All Alzheimer's disease (AD) RCTs require participants to enroll with a study partner. We examined AE reporting rates in mild-to-moderate AD trials and their associations with study partner type. We estimated AE reporting rates using placebo data from seven independent RCTs conducted by the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study. We assessed the heterogeneity of reporting rates as a function of visits using generalized estimating equations. In the primary analysis, we tested the hypotheses that the rates of reporting differed by study partner type and time they spent with the participant weekly using Poisson regression with robust variance estimation. In all regression models, log-transformed total patient years was included. The estimated reporting rates were 2.83 (95% CI: 2.66, 3.02), 1.18 (95% CI: 1.09, 1.28), 0.23 (95% CI: 0.19, 0.27), and 0.28 (95% CI: 0.24, 0.33) events per participant year for grade 1-3 AEs and SAEs, respectively. We estimated that greater number of visits per year was associated with increased reporting for grade 1-2 AEs and SAEs. We did not find evidence to suggest that AE reporting differed by study partner type or by time the study partner spent with the participant. Study partner type and time the study partner spent with the participant did not appear to impact AE reporting. Estimated reporting rates may be useful to evaluate safety in future studies, particularly those with no control arm and similar visit frequencies.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Monoclonal Antibodies for Cognitive Decline in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Recent clinical trials of anti-Aβ monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in the treatment of early Alzheimer's disease (AD) have produced encouraging cognitive and clinical results. The purpose of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare and rank mAb drugs according to their efficacy and safety. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials testing various mAbs for the treatment of cognitive decline in patients with AD, up to March 31, 2023. R software (version 4.2.3) along with JAGS and STATA software (version 15.0) were used for statistical analysis. Odds ratio (OR) for binary variables, mean difference (MD) for continuous variables, and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were utilized to estimate treatment effects and rank probabilities for each mAb in terms of safety and efficacy outcomes. We calculated the surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) to evaluate each mAb, with higher SUCRA values indicating better efficacy or lower likelihood of adverse events. Thirty-three randomized controlled trials with a total of 21,087 patients were included in the current NMA, involving eight different mAbs. SUCRA values showed that aducanumab (87.01% and 99.37%, respectively) was the most likely to achieve the best therapeutic effect based on the changes of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Clinical Dementia Rating scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) scores. Donanemab (88.50% and 99.00%, respectively) performed better than other therapies for Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) and Positron Emission Tomography-Standardized Uptake Value ratio (PET-SUVr). Lecanemab (87.24%) may be the most promising way to slow down the decrease of Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) score. In the analysis of the incidence of adverse events (subjects with any treatment-emergent adverse event), gantenerumab (89.12%) had the least potential for adverse events, while lecanemab (0.79%) may cause more adverse events. Solanezumab (95.75% and 80.38%, respectively) had the lowest incidence of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities characterized by edema and effusion (ARIA-E) and by cerebral microhemorrhages (ARIA-H) of the included immunotherapies. While SUCRA values provided a comprehensive measure of treatment efficacy, the inherent statistical uncertainty required careful analysis in clinical application. Despite immunotherapies significantly increasing the risks of adverse events and ARIA, the data suggest that mAbs can effectively improve the cognitive function of patients with mild and moderate AD. According to the NMA, aducanumab was the most likely to achieve significant improvements in different cognitive and clinical assessments (statistically improved MMSE and CDR-SB), followed by donanemab (statistically improved ADAS-Cog, and PET-SUVr) and lecanemab (statistically improved ADCS-ADL).

Effect of matcha green tea on cognitive functions and sleep quality in older adults with cognitive decline: A randomized controlled study over 12 months.

Lifestyle habits after middle age significantly impact the maintenance of cognitive function in older adults. Nutritional intake is closely related to lifestyle habits; therefore, nutrition is a pivotal factor in the prevention of dementia in the preclinical stages. Matcha green tea powder (matcha), which contains epigallocatechin gallate, theanine, and caffeine, has beneficial effects on cognitive function and mood. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study over 12 months to examine the effect of matcha on cognitive function and sleep quality. Ninety-nine participants, including 64 with subjective cognitive decline and 35 with mild cognitive impairment were randomized, with 49 receiving 2 g of matcha and 50 receiving a placebo daily. Participants were stratified based on two factors: age at baseline and APOE genotype. Changes in cognitive function and sleep quality were analyzed using a mixed-effects model. Matcha consumption led to significant improvements in social acuity score (difference; -1.39, 95% confidence interval; -2.78, 0.002) (P = 0.028) as evaluated by the perception of facial emotions in cognitive function. The primary outcomes, that is, Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Activity of Daily Living scores, showed no significant changes with matcha intervention. Meanwhile, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores indicated a trend toward improvement with a difference of 0.86 (95% confidence interval; -0.002, 1.71) (P = 0.088) between the groups in changes from baseline to 12 months. The present study suggests regular consumption of matcha could improve emotional perception and sleep quality in older adults with mild cognitive decline. Given the widespread availability and cultural acceptance of matcha green tea, incorporating it into the daily routine may offer a simple yet effective strategy for cognitive enhancement and dementia prevention.

Lecanemab: A Humanized Monoclonal Antibody for the Treatment of Early Alzheimer Disease.

To review current pharmacology, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, safety, and efficacy of lecanemab in patients with Alzheimer disease. A literature search of PubMed (April 1, 2016-November 15, 2023) and ClinicalTrials.gov search were conducted using the following search terms: lecanemab and BAN2401. Additional articles were identified by hand from references. We included English-language clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, reviews, and systematic reviews evaluating lecanemab pharmacology, efficacy, or safety in humans for the management of Alzheimer disease. In the Clarity AD phase III trial, lecanemab led to a decrease in brain amyloid levels and showed moderate improvement in clinical measures of cognition and function. At 18 months, lecanemab 10 mg/kg biweekly exhibited a lower least squares mean change from baseline (1.21) compared to placebo (1.66) of Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes score, signifying a significant difference of -0.45 (95% CI, -0.67 to -0.23; P < 0.001). In a subset of 698 participants, lecanemab reduced brain amyloid burden by -59.1 Centiloids (95% CI, -62.6 to -55.6). Lecanemab demonstrated favorable differences in Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale 14, Alzheimer Disease Composite Score, and Alzheimer Disease Cooperative Study-Mild Cognitive Impairment-Activities of Daily Living scores. Adverse events included infusion-related reactions (26.4%) and amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (12.6%). Lecanemab reduces cognitive decline but raises concerns about intravenous administration, cost, and magnetic resonance imaging needs. Ongoing trials exploring subcutaneous dosing and positron emission tomography scans may offer solutions. Lecanemab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that is selective for soluble amyloid-beta (Aβ) aggregates. Lecanemab has exhibited a decrease in brain Aβ plaques and moderately less decline on clinical measures of cognitive function.

Effects of informant replacement in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) trials require enrollment with an informant. We assessed relationships between informant replacement and Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) scores across four AD trials. Using generalized estimating equations, we examined associations between replacement and change in ADCS-ADL between successive visits. We used analysis of covariance to estimate the association between replacement and 18-month change from baseline, and an F-test to compare the variance of this change. Among 1336 participants, 63 (≈5%) experienced replacement. Between-visit mean change in ADCS-ADL was 2.44 points lower comparing replacement to stable informants (95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.91, -0.98). The difference in between-visit mean absolute change was 2.38 points (95% CI: 1.24, 3.52). Replacement was not significantly associated with an 18-month change from baseline. The ratio of variances (replacement/stable) was 1.80 (95% CI: 1.19, 2.99). Informant replacement is associated with bias and increased variability between visits and increased variance for overall ADCS-ADL.

Adjunctive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) plus sodium benzoate for the treatment of early-phase Alzheimer's disease: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Previous studies found that an NMDA receptor (NMDAR) enhancer, sodium benzoate, improved cognitive function of patients with early-phase Alzheimer's disease (AD). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induces NMDAR-dependent synaptic plasticity and strengthens cognitive function of AD patients. This study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of tDCS plus benzoate in early-phase dementia. In this 24-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 97 patients with early-phase AD received 10-session tDCS during the first 2 weeks. They then took benzoate or placebo for 24 weeks. We assessed the patients using Alzheimer's disease assessment scale - cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog), Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change plus Caregiver Input, Mini Mental Status Examination, Alzheimer's disease Cooperative Study scale for ADL in MCI, and a battery of additional cognitive tests. Forty-seven patients received sodium benzoate, and the other 50 placebo. The two treatment groups didn't differ significantly in ADAS-cog or other measures. Addition of benzoate to tDCS didn't get extra benefit or side effect in this study. For more thoroughly studying the potential of combining tDCS with benzoate in the AD treatment, future research should use other study designs, such as longer-term benzoate treatment, adding benzoate in the middle of tDCS trial sessions, or administering benzoate then tDCS.

An efficient doubly-robust imputation framework for longitudinal dropout, with an application to an Alzheimer’s clinical trial

We develop a novel doubly-robust (DR) imputation framework for longitudinal studies with monotone dropout, motivated by the informative dropout that is common in FDA-regulated trials for Alzheimer's disease. In this approach, the missing data are first imputed using a doubly-robust augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW) estimator, then the imputed completed data are substituted into a full-data estimating equation, and the estimate is obtained using standard software. The imputed completed data may be inspected and compared to the observed data, and standard model diagnostics are available. The same imputed completed data can be used for several different estimands, such as subgroup analyses in a clinical trial, allowing for reduced computation and increased consistency across analyses. We present two specific DR imputation estimators, AIPW-I and AIPW-S, study their theoretical properties, and investigate their performance by simulation. AIPW-S has substantially reduced computational burden compared to many other DR estimators, at the cost of some loss of efficiency and the requirement of stronger assumptions. Simulation studies support the theoretical properties and good performance of the DR imputation framework. Importantly, we demonstrate their ability to address time-varying covariates, such as a time by treatment interaction. We illustrate using data from a large randomized Phase III trial investigating the effect of donepezil in Alzheimer's disease, from the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS) group.

Share of and Absolute Costs of Informal Care in Five Subpopulations of Outpatients with Dementia in Croatia: A Latent Profile Analysis.

High heterogeneity exists in estimates of the share of and absolute costs of informal care (IC) for individuals diagnosed with dementia. To assess the differences in the share of and absolute costs of IC between subpopulations defined by latent profiles of activities of daily living (ADLs), neuropsychiatric symptoms, and global cognitive functioning. We performed a nested cross-sectional analysis of data collected from 2019-2021 at the Zagreb-Zapad Health Center, Zagreb, Croatia, from a sample of patients and their caregivers. The outcome was the share of costs of IC in the total costs of care estimated using the Resource Utilization in Dementia questionnaire. We used latent profile analysis of six principal components of the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study ADLs inventory, Neuropsychiatric Inventory and Mini-Mental State Examination, and conducted the analysis using beta and quantile regression. We enrolled 240 patients with a median age of 74 years; 78% were women. The annual cost for treatment and care for one patient was 11,462 (95% confidence interval 9,947; 12,976) EUR. After the adjustment for covariates, five latent profiles were significantly associated with the share of costs and absolute cost of IC. The adjusted annual costs of IC ranged from 2,157 EUR, with a share of 53% in the first latent profile, to 18,119 EUR, with a share of 78% in the fifth latent profile. The population of patients with dementia was heterogeneous, and there were relatively large differences in the share and absolute costs of IC between particular subpopulations.

Evidence of Clinical Efficacy and Pharmacological Mechanisms of Resveratrol in the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.

To evaluate the efficacy and pharmacological mechanisms of resveratrol in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. We conducted a thorough exploration of existing randomized controlled trials concerning the treatment of Alzheimer's disease patients using resveratrol, utilizing accessible open databases. Quantitative variables were represented as a standardized mean difference (SMD), accompanied by a 95% confidence interval (CI). Additionally, we examined the potential targets and plausible pathways associated with the impact of resveratrol on Alzheimer's disease using network pharmacology techniques. Our meta-analysis comprised five trials involving 271 AD patients, of whom 139 received resveratrol treatment and 132 received placebo treatment. Compared with placebo therapy, resveratrol treatment resulted in a significant improvement in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study- Activities of Daily Living (ADAS-ADL) scores (SMD=0.51; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.78) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ40 (SMD=0.84; 95% CI, 0.21 to 1.47) and plasma Aβ40 levels (SMD=0.43; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.79). However, the improvement in the resveratrol-treated group compared with the placebo treatment group on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, CSF Aβ42 and plasma Aβ42 levels, and brain volume was not significant. There were no noteworthy statistical variances in the occurrence of adverse effects noted between the two groups. The outcomes of network pharmacology divulged that the principal enriched interaction pathway between resveratrol and Alzheimer's disease is primarily concentrated within the PI3K signaling pathways. Resveratrol's potential key targets for the treatment of AD include MAKP1, HRAS, EGFR, and MAPK2K1. While having a high safety profile, resveratrol has efficacy in AD patients to a certain extent, and more data are required to validate the efficacy of resveratrol for the treatment of AD in the future. Suppression of the PI3K signaling pathways could hold significant importance in the treatment of AD patients using resveratrol.

Safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of SYN120, a dual 5-HT6/5-HT2A antagonist, for the treatment of Parkinson disease dementia: A randomized, controlled, proof-of-concept trial

BackgroundSYN120 is a dual serotonin receptor (5-HT6/5-HT2A) antagonist hypothesized to improve cognition and psychiatric symptoms. ObjectivesWe evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of SYN120 in patients with Parkinson disease dementia (PDD). MethodsIn a multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, 16-week phase 2a proof-of-concept trial in PDD with concomitant cholinesterase inhibitor use, eligible patients were randomized to oral SYN120 (100 mg/day) or placebo. Adverse events (AEs), Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores, and discontinuations assessed safety and tolerability. The primary and key secondary efficacy measures were the Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerized assessment system Continuity of Attention and Quality of Episodic Memory scores. Other efficacy measures were: Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog), Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinician's Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC), Brief Penn Parkinson's Daily Activity Questionnaire-15 (PDAQ-15), Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease-Sleep Scale (SCOPA-Sleep), and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). ResultsEighty-two patients were randomized to SYN120 (N = 38) or placebo (N = 44), AEs occurred in 74% and 77% of patients, and treatment discontinuation in both groups was 16%. Nausea and vomiting were more frequent, and motor symptoms (UPDRS) worsened in the SYN120 group. At week 16, the SYN120 and placebo groups did not differ significantly for any cognitive assessment. Cognitive activities of daily living (PDAQ-15) and the NPI-Apathy/Indifference scores improved nominally in the SYN120 group compared with placebo (unadjusted p = 0.029 and 0.028). ConclusionsSYN120 was adequately tolerated, mild worsening of motor symptoms was noted and it did not improve cognition in PDD patients. Its potential benefits for cognitive activities of daily living and apathy warrant further study. RegistrationClinicaltrials.gov as NCT02258152.

Heterogeneity of Response to Methylphenidate in Apathetic Patients in the ADMET 2 Trial

The Apathy in Dementia Methylphenidate Trial 2 (ADMET 2) found that methylphenidate was effective in treating apathy with a small-to-medium effect size but showed heterogeneity in response. We assessed clinical predictors of response to help determine individual likelihood of treatment benefit from methylphenidate. Univariate and multivariate analyses of 22 clinical predictors of response chosen a priori. Data from the ADMET 2 randomized, placebo controlled multi-center clinical trial. Alzheimer's disease patients with clinically significant apathy. Apathy assessed with the Neuropsychiatric Inventory apathy domain (NPI-A). In total, 177 participants (67% male, mean [SD] age 76.4 [7.9], mini-mental state examination 19.3 [4.8]) had 6-months follow up data. Six potential predictors met criteria for inclusion in multivariate modeling. Methylphenidate was more efficacious in participants without NPI anxiety (change in NPI-A -2.21, standard error [SE]:0.60) or agitation (-2.63, SE:0.68), prescribed cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEI) (-2.44, SE:0.62), between 52 and 72 years of age (-2.93, SE:1.05), had 73-80 mm Hg diastolic blood pressure (-2.43, SE: 1.03), and more functional impairment (-2.56, SE:1.16) as measured by the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living scale. Individuals who were not anxious or agitated, younger, prescribed a ChEI, with optimal (73-80 mm Hg) diastolic blood pressure, or having more impaired function were more likely to benefit from methylphenidate compared to placebo. Clinicians may preferentially consider methylphenidate for apathetic AD participants already prescribed a ChEI and without baseline anxiety or agitation.

Cognitive function and brain structure correlates in individuals with subjective cognitive decline: Voxel‐based morphometry results from a lifestyle intervention to prevent Alzheimer’s disease (PENSA study)

AbstractBackgroundInterventions based on the modification of several lifestyle factors have provided promising results to maintain cognitive function in late/middle‐aged individuals at higher risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Framed under the WW‐FINGERS network, the PENSA clinical trial is focused on the prevention of cognitive decline in individuals with subjective cognitive decline who are also APOEε4 carriers. It consists of a 12‐month multimodal lifestyle intervention supplemented with EGCG, a natural flavonoid from green tea. In this study, we looked for the brain structure correlates of cognitive performance for PENSA participants at baseline.MethodsOne hundred thirty‐one (N = 131) participants of the PENSA study at baseline [Table 1] with valid T1w, T2w and FLAIR MRI scans were included. They underwent a neuropsychological assessment battery consisting of the modified Alzheimer Disease Cooperative Study ‐ Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (ADCS‐PACC‐Plus‐exe) that includes MMSE, Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT), Delayed Recall Logical Memory (DRLM), Five Digits Test, Digit Symbol Substitution Test, and Stroop. Additional cognitive measurements were obtained from semantic verbal fluency (SVF), Boston Naming Test, digit span subtest, visual puzzle subtest (VPT) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. FLAIR images were used to segment white matter hyperintensities and perform a lesion filling procedure in T1w and T2w images. These two later modalities were then entered into a multimodal segmentation in the SPM12 voxel‐based morphometry pipeline. Associations between test scores and grey matter volumes (GMv) were sought (p&lt;0.001) including age, sex, education, and total intracranial volume as confounders.ResultsA positive association was found (p uncorr &lt;0.001; k&gt;200) between GMv and ADCS‐PACC‐Plus‐exe composite [Figure 1] in the bilateral hippocampus, amygdala, entorhinal and parahippocampal gyri. Additionally, positive correlations (p uncorr &lt;0.001; k&gt;200) were found between GMv and FCSRT, DRLM, VPT and SVF tests albeit in less consistent regional patterns. No associations were found between GMv and the remaining tests.ConclusionIn a sample at high risk of developing AD, the ADCS‐PACC‐Plus‐exe composite is associated with GMv in brain areas known to be affected in AD. These results suggest that the ADCS‐PACC‐Plus‐exe composite might be sensitive to detect subtle cognitive changes in cognitively unimpaired at‐risk individuals.

PENSA study for the prevention of cognitive decline in APOE‐ɛ4 carriers with subjective cognitive decline: Description of baseline demographic and neuropsychological data of the study population

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer’s disease (AD) is a multifactorial disorder likely caused by a complex interplay of different pathological processes that are influenced by internal and external determinants. In the absence of effective treatments to reverse cognitive deterioration related to AD, there is a need to develop novel non‐pharmacological prevention interventions that may delay or prevent these pathological processes at early preclinical stages of AD. The PENSA study, framed within the WW‐FINGERS consortium, is a randomized clinical trial involving cognitively normal elderly individuals with an increased risk of developing AD (meeting subjective cognitive decline, SCD‐plus criteria and being APOE‐ɛ4 carriers). The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of a multimodal personalized lifestyle intervention (dietary and physical activity counseling and cognitive training) combined with a dietary supplement, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) in slowing down cognitive decline.MethodBaseline sociodemographic, mood and cognitive characteristics of the entire study sample participants is presented. Cognitive function was measured with the Alzheimer Disease Cooperative Study Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (ADCS‐PACC) and adding to this original version the interference score from the Stroop Color and Word Test and the Five Digit Test (ADCS‐PACC‐Plus‐exe). Additionally, the Digit Span, the Boston Naming Test and the Animal Fluency Test were administered. Psychological distress was measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.ResultOn Desember 2021 the study had enrolled 128 individuals (64.8% women) with a mean (SD) age of 67.3 (4.73) years and the following APOE genotype: 87% ɛ3/ɛ4, 7% ɛ4/ɛ4 and 6% ɛ2/ɛ4. Most had higher education (44.1%) and 81.9% were retired (Table 1). 11% of participants exhibited relevant anxiety and depressive symptoms measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. According to an ad‐hoc SCD questionnaire, 65.8% of participants referred memory centered complaints. Considering the different domains, participants reported alterations on memory (97.6%), concentration (62.6%), language (69.9%) and visuospatial skills (10.6%). Table 2 shows the ADCS‐PACC‐Plus‐exe scoresConclusionThe PENSA study will help shed light on the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions supplemented with EGCG to prevent cognitive decline in people at risk of developing AD.

Cross-sectional and longitudinal assessments of function in prodromal-to-mild Alzheimer's disease: A comparison of the ADCS-ADL and A-IADL-Q scales.

Prior observational work in a heterogeneous cohort of participants with mild cognitive impairment suggests the Amsterdam Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire (A-IADL-Q) may have greater sensitivity for functional decline than the more established Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) scale. However, the relative utility of the A-IADL-Q versus the ADCS-ADL for clinical trials in early Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains uncertain. We compared baseline and longitudinal performance of the A-IADL-Q and ADCS-ADL in participants with biomarker-confirmed prodromal (pAD; n=158) or mild (mAD; n=283) AD enrolled in the 18-month Tauriel study of semorinemab (NCT03289143). The A-IADL-Q exhibited numerically stronger discrimination between pAD and mAD participants at baseline per Cohen's d analyses and similar sensitivity to longitudinal decline across cohorts over 18 months relative to the ADCS-ADL. The comparable performance of the ADCS-ADL and A-IADL-Q supports the utility of the A-IADL-Q in early AD clinical trials. The Amsterdam Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire (A-IADL-Q) may be more sensitive than the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADCS-ADL) for distinguishing prodromal and mild Alzheimer's disease (AD).A-IADL-Q and ADCS-ADL are similarly sensitive to decline in early AD over 18 months.Comparable performance of these indices supports A-IADL-Q use in future AD trials.Additional AD clinical trial data could extend findings across more diverse cohorts.

The Fifth Bioelectronic Medicine Summit Hosted by the Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research (Manhasset, NY) and Columbia Engineering (NY, NY) at The Garden City Hotel, Garden City, NY 11530 on October 11-12th, 2022- Bioelectronic Medicine: Today’s Tools, Tomorrow’s Therapies

The Fifth Bioelectronic Medicine Summit Hosted by the Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research (Manhasset, NY) and Columbia Engineering (NY, NY) at The Garden City Hotel, Garden City, NY 11530 on October 11-12th, 2022- Bioelectronic Medicine: Today’s Tools, Tomorrow’s Therapies

Psychometric properties of the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study – Activities of Daily Living for Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-MCI-ADL) scale: a post hoc analysis of the ADCS ADC-008 trial

BackgroundThe Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study – Activities of Daily Living Scale for use in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), the ADCS-ADL-MCI, is an evaluation scale with information provided by an informant/caregiver to describe the functional impairment of patients with MCI. As the ADCS-ADL-MCI has yet to undergo a full psychometric evaluation, this study aimed to evaluate the measurement properties of the ADCS-ADL-MCI in subjects with amnestic MCI.MethodsMeasurement properties, including item-level analysis, internal consistency reliability, test–retest reliability, construct validity (convergent/discriminant, known-groups validity), and responsiveness were evaluated using data from the ADCS ADC-008 trial, a 36-month, multicenter, placebo-controlled study in 769 subjects with amnestic MCI (defined by clinical criteria and a global clinical dementia rating, CDR, score of 0.5). Due to most subjects' mild condition at baseline and resulting low variance in scores, psychometric properties were assessed using both baseline and 36-month data.ResultsCeiling effects were not apparent at the total score level, with 3% of the cohort reaching the maximum score of 53, despite most subjects having a relatively high score at baseline (mean score = 46.0 [standard deviation = 4.8]). Item-total correlations were overall weak at baseline, most likely due to low variability in responses; however, at month 36, good item homogeneity was found. Cronbach's alpha values ranged from acceptable (0.64 at baseline) to good (0.87 at month 36), indicating overall very good internal consistency reliability. Further, moderate to good test–retest reliability was found (intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.62–0.73). The analyses also largely supported convergent/discriminant validity, especially at month 36. Finally, the ADCS-ADL-MCI discriminated well between groups showing good known-groups validity, and was responsive in patients who indicated a longitudinal change in other instruments.ConclusionsThis study provides a comprehensive psychometric evaluation of the ADCS-ADL-MCI. Findings suggest that the ADCS-ADL-MCI is a reliable, valid and responsive measure capable of capturing functional abilities in patients with amnestic MCI.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000173.

Wrist-worn sensor-based measurements for drug effect detection with small samples in people with Lewy Body Dementia

IntroductionFew late-stage clinical trials in Parkinson's disease (PD) have produced evidence on the clinical validity of sensor-based digital measurements of daily life activities to detect responses to treatment. The objective of this study was to assess whether digital measures from patients with mild-to-moderate Lewy Body Dementia demonstrate treatment effects during a randomized Phase 2 trial. MethodsSubstudy within a 12-week trial of mevidalen (placebo vs 10, 30, or 75 mg), where 70/344 patients (comparable to the overall population) wore a wrist-worn multi-sensor device. ResultsTreatment effects were statistically significant by conventional clinical assessments (Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [MDS-UPDRS] sum of Parts I-III and Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change [ADCS-CGIC] scores) in the full study cohort at Week 12, but not in the substudy. However, digital measurements detected significant effects in the substudy cohort at week 6, persisting to week 12. ConclusionsDigital measurements detected treatment effects in a smaller cohort over a shorter period than conventional clinical assessments. Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, NCT03305809

Technical Review of Clinical Outcomes Assessments Across the Continuum of Alzheimer's Disease.

Insight into the relationship between concepts that matter to the people affected by Alzheimer's disease (AD) and the clinical outcome assessments (COAs) commonly used in AD clinical studies is limited. Phases 1 and 2 of the What Matters Most (WMM) study series identified and quantitatively confirmed 42 treatment-related outcomes that are important to people affected by AD. We compared WMM concepts rated as "very important" or higher to items included in COAs used commonly in AD studies. Twenty COAs designed to assess signs, symptoms, and impacts across the spectrum of AD were selected for review. Among these 20 COAs, only 5 reflected 12 or more WMM concepts [Integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS), Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL), Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory-Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-ADL-MCI), Alzheimer's Disease Composite Scores (ADCOMS), and Clinical Dementia Rating; Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR/CDR-SB)]. Multiple symptoms and impacts of AD identified as important and meaningful in the WMM studies map only indirectly at best to 7 of the 20 most widely used COAs. While many frequently used COAs in AD capture some concepts identified as important to AD populations and their care partners, overlap between any single measure and the concepts that matter to people affected by AD is limited. The highest singly matched COA reflects fewer than half (45%) of WMM concepts. Use of multiple COAs expands coverage of meaningful concepts. Future research should explore the content validity of AD COAs planned for AD trials based on further confirmation of the ecological validity of the WMM items. This research should inform development and use of core outcome sets that capture WMM items and selection or development of new companion tools to fully demonstrate clinically meaningful outcomes spanning WMM.