Newer sour beers are often packaged in aluminum cans, but the compatibility of sour beer and its major acids (lactic, acetic) with cans is unclear. In an initial study, commercial sour beers were packaged in cans containing one of four different liners (bisphenol A (BPA) epoxy, two BPA–non-intent (BPA-NI) epoxy, and acrylic). Corrosion, as measured by dissolved aluminum and visual degradation of the liner, was positively correlated with concentrations of lactic acid, acetic acid, and decreased pH value. After 48 wk, aluminum concentrations up to 58 mg/L were observed in one sour beer, or nearly 100-fold greater than typical dissolved aluminum concentrations in non-sour beers. Liner type did not affect corrosion. In a subsequent model sour beer study with two acrylic liners and one BPA-NI liner, molecular SO2 positively correlated with corrosion, but only at concentrations 5-fold higher than the maximum expected in sour beers. Other added components (chloride, copper, ethanol) did not affect corrosion. Addition of acetic, lactic, and phosphoric acid in varying equinormal combinations to a non-sour beer demonstrated that acetic and lactic acids (average dissolved aluminum = 2.54 mg/L following storage) promote corrosion more than phosphoric acid (average dissolved aluminum = 0.47 mg/L). Titratable acidity (TA) correlated well with corrosion, with increased dissolved aluminum observed at TA > 6 g/L as lactic acid equivalents. Organic acid corrosivity was hypothesized to relate to the proportion of acid in its neutral form, and thus these findings are relevant to producers of other beverages with high levels of organic acids.
Read full abstract