You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Detection and Screening V1 Apr 20122209 ULTRA HIGH-RESOLUTION TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND: A NOVEL TECHNIQUE FOR ENHANCED PROSTATE CANCER IMAGING Jeffrey Mullins, Toby Cornish, Adam Reese, Joel Fradin, Lynda Mettee, Frederic Askin, Rachael Luck, Angelo DeMarzo, Jonathan Epstein, and Christian Pavlovich Jeffrey MullinsJeffrey Mullins Baltimore, MD More articles by this author , Toby CornishToby Cornish Baltimore, MD More articles by this author , Adam ReeseAdam Reese Baltimore, MD More articles by this author , Joel FradinJoel Fradin Baltimore, MD More articles by this author , Lynda MetteeLynda Mettee Baltimore, MD More articles by this author , Frederic AskinFrederic Askin Baltimore, MD More articles by this author , Rachael LuckRachael Luck Baltimore, MD More articles by this author , Angelo DeMarzoAngelo DeMarzo Baltimore, MD More articles by this author , Jonathan EpsteinJonathan Epstein Baltimore, MD More articles by this author , and Christian PavlovichChristian Pavlovich Baltimore, MD More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.2384AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Prostate cancer is the only solid malignancy for which no reliable imaging modality exists. Ultra high-resolution transrectal ultrasound (UHR-TRUS) provides enhanced image definition by utilizing a unique transducer with a center frequency of 21 MHz. We report the results of an initial utilizing UHR-TRUS for the detection of human prostate cancer. METHODS Men with prostate cancer and gland size <60cc by LR-TRUS who were scheduled for radical prostatectomy (RP) were prospectively recruited into a clinical trial comparing UHR-TRUS and standard low-resolution TRUS (LR-TRUS). Patients were preoperatively imaged transrectally using both modalities in an attempt to identify foci of altered echogenicity > 5mm in maximum diameter in each sextant area of the prostate. Actual areas of prostate cancer > 5mm in maximal diameter at sagittally-sectioned RP specimen were correlated to abnormal foci previously noted on sagittal LR- and UHR-TRUS cine-loops. Complications, adverse events, and pain scores using LR-TRUS or UHR-TRUS were recorded. Sensitivity and specificity analysis were performed for each imaging modality. UHR-TRUS equipment was provided by Imagistx Inc. and LR-TRUS was using a standard Aloka system. RESULTS 20 men were prospectively recruited into the trial. There were no complications or adverse events. Pain scores using LR- and UHR-probes were low and not significantly different. Among the 56 pathologically identified cancerous foci, LR-TRUS identified 23 and missed 33. HR-TRUS identified 36 and missed 20. Sensitivity was 41.1% for LR-TRUS and 64.3% for UHR-TRUS. Specificity was 59.4% for LR-TRUS and 71.9% for UHR-TRUS. Agreements between LR-TRUS vs. pathology and UHR-TRUS vs. pathology were compared using McNemar's test; UHR-TRUS was significantly superior to LR-TRUS (p =0.01045) for cancer detection. CONCLUSIONS UHR-TRUS appears to be a safe and promising imaging modality for prostate cancer detection. Our initial experience suggests superiority to LR-TRUS for the detection of cancerous foci. Based on these promising results, planning of a clinical trial of UHR-TRUS in the biopsy setting is underway. © 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 187Issue 4SApril 2012Page: e891 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Jeffrey Mullins Baltimore, MD More articles by this author Toby Cornish Baltimore, MD More articles by this author Adam Reese Baltimore, MD More articles by this author Joel Fradin Baltimore, MD More articles by this author Lynda Mettee Baltimore, MD More articles by this author Frederic Askin Baltimore, MD More articles by this author Rachael Luck Baltimore, MD More articles by this author Angelo DeMarzo Baltimore, MD More articles by this author Jonathan Epstein Baltimore, MD More articles by this author Christian Pavlovich Baltimore, MD More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract