Abstract Background In Latin America, clinical experience with Upadacitinib for CD in terms of effectiveness and safety is limited. In Colombia, CD is an orphan disease and in many cases is highly refractory to conventional treatments. The objective of this study is to describe the real-life experience in Colombian patients with CD treated with Upadacitinib. Methods Descriptive observational study, patients with CD treated with Upadacitinib in induction phase (45 mg orally once a day for 12 weeks) in different reference centers nationwide. The therapeutic response was evaluated in endoscopic and/or imaging, paraclinical and clinical terms (CDAI). Additionally, the frequency of adverse events (AE), steroid use and extraintestinal manifestations (EIM) were measured. Results 10 patients, 5/10 (50%) female, mean age 43.15 years (SD; 22.7 range 14.2-21.3). Mean age at diagnosis of CD 37.7 (SD 23.15) years (range 6.9-67.5). Mean time between disease onset and start of Upadacitinib 3.33 (SD 8.17) years (range 0.1-15.9). Most patients had moderate to severe CD; 7/10 (70%) patients with ileocolonic disease and 3 (30%) with ileal disease. 5 patients with stricturing disease and 3 patients with active penetrating disease. All patients had previously failed tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, 8/10 (80%) had failed integrin alpha4 beta7 inhibitors (Vedolizumab). Six patients had EIM. Six patients had a history of surgery for CD. Additionally, 4/10 (40%) patients were using a steroid before starting Upadacitinib and 6/10 (60%) patients were using an immunomodulator. During the induction phase, 7/10 (70%) achieved clinical response, 2/10 (20%) clinical remission, and 5/10 (50%) paraclinical remission. 4/6 (66.6%) patients achieved improvement in imaging findings. All patients with EIM showed improvement of EIM. 2/5 (40%) patients showed improvement of perianal disease. Only one patient required surgery for CD. 3/4 (75%) were able to discontinue corticosteroid and 1/4 (25%) achieved steroid dose reduction. One patient required discontinuation of Upadacitinib, due to lack of response and severe sepsis. One patient reported acne after induction. No other AEs were reported. Conclusion Upadacitinib is an effective option for patients with CD with inflammatory, stenosing and penetrating phenotypes refractory to multiple treatments, suggesting a reduced requirement for surgical procedures. Long-term real-life studies are needed to determine whether there is persistence of response in maintenance.
Read full abstract