Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients Research Articles

Three doses of a recombinant conjugated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine early after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: predicting indicators of a high serologic response-a prospective, single-arm study.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) recipients must be vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 as quickly as possible after transplantation. The difficulty in obtaining recommended SARS-CoV-2 vaccines for allo-HSCT recipients motivated us to utilize an accessible and affordable SARS-CoV-2 vaccine with a recombinant receptor-binding domain (RBD)-tetanus toxoid (TT)-conjugated platform shortly after allo-HSCT in the developing country of Iran. This prospective, single-arm study aimed to investigate immunogenicity and its predictors following a three-dose SARS-CoV-2 RBD-TT-conjugated vaccine regimen administered at 4-week (±1-week) intervals in patients within 3-12 months post allo-HSCT. An immune status ratio (ISR) was measured at baseline and 4 weeks (±1 week) after each vaccine dose using a semiquantitative immunoassay. Using the median ISR as a cut-off point for immune response intensity, we performed a logistic regression analysis to determine the predictive impact of several baseline factors on the intensity of the serologic response following the third vaccination dose. Thirty-six allo-HSCT recipients, with a mean age of 42.42 years and a median time of 133 days between hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) and the start of vaccination, were analyzed. Our findings, using the generalized estimating equation (GEE) model, indicated that, compared with the baseline ISR of 1.55 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94 to 2.17], the ISR increased significantly during the three-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccination regimen. The ISR reached 2.32 (95% CI 1.84 to 2.79; p=0.010) after the second dose and 3.87 (95% CI 3.25 to 4.48; p=0.001) after the third dose of vaccine, reflecting 69.44% and 91.66% seropositivity, respectively. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, the female sex of the donor [odds ratio (OR) 8.67; p=0.028] and a higher level donor ISR at allo-HSCT (OR 3.56; p=0.050) were the two positive predictors of strong immune response following the third vaccine dose. No serious adverse events (i.e., grades 3 and 4) were observed following the vaccination regimen. We concluded that early vaccination of allo-HSCT recipients with a three-dose RBD-TT-conjugated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is safe and could improve the early post-allo-HSCT immune response. We further believe that the pre-allo-HSCT SARS-CoV-2 immunization of donors may enhance post-allo-HSCT seroconversion in allo-HSCT recipients who receive the entire course of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine during the first year after allo-HSCT.

Risk factors for development of skin cancer differ between allogenic and autogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

Risk factors for development of skin cancer differ between allogenic and autogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

CD34 Stem Cell Boost in Pediatric Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Case Series and Review of Literature

Patients with poor graft function (PGF) or declining donor chimerism (DC) post allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) may benefit from a CD34-selected stem cell boost (SCB). We retrospectively studied outcomes of fourteen pediatric patients (PGF: 12 and declining DC: 2), with a median age of 12.8 (range 0.08–20.6) years at HCT, who received a SCB. Primary and secondary endpoints included resolution of PGF or improvement in DC (≥ 15% increase), overall survival (OS) and transplant-related mortality (TRM), respectively. The median CD34 dose infused was 7.47 × 106/kg (range 3.51 × 106–3.39 × 107/kg). Among patients with PGF who survived ≥ 3 months post-SCB (n = 8), we observed a non-significant decrease in the cumulative median number of red cell transfusions, platelet transfusions, and GCSF but not intravenous immunoglobulin doses in the 3 months before and after SCB. Overall response rate (ORR) was 50%, with 29% complete and 21% partial responses. ORR was better in recipients who received lymphodepletion (LD) pre-SCB versus none (75% versus 40%; p = 0.56). The incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host-disease was 7% and 14%, respectively. The 1-year OS was 50% (95% CI 23–72%) and TRM was 29% (95% CI 8–58%). SCB was effective in half of our cohort with possible benefit of LD pre-SCB.

Prognostic factors for the development of lower respiratory tract infection after influenza virus infection in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: A Kanto Study Group for Cell Therapy multicenter analysis

ObjectivesInfluenza virus infection (IVI) occasionally causes lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients. Although the progression to LRTI entails a high mortality, the role of early antiviral therapy for its prevention has not been fully elucidated. MethodsThis was a multicenter retrospective study using an additional questionnaire. Allo-HSCT recipients who developed IVI between 2012 and 2020 were included. ResultsA total of 278 cases of IVI after allo-HSCT were identified from 15 institutions. The median patient age was 49 years, and the median time from allo-HSCT to IVI was 918 days. Neuraminidase inhibitors were administered within 48 hours of symptom onset (early neuraminidase inhibitor [NAI]) in 199 (76.9%) patients. Subsequently, 36 (12.3%) patients developed LRTI. On the multivariate analysis, age ≥50 years (hazard ratio [HR], 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-4.58) and moderate to severe chronic graft-versus-host disease (HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.14-4.58) were significantly associated with progression to LRTI, whereas early NAI suppressed the progression (HR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.06-0.46). The IVI-related mortality rate was 2.2%. ConclusionTo reduce the risk of LRTI development after IVI, early NAI therapy should be considered in allo-HSCT recipients, especially with older patients and those with chronic graft-versus-host disease.

Pretransplant systemic metabolic profiles in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients - identification of patient subsets with increased transplant-related mortality

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is used in the treatment of high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), however, the treatment has high risk of severe transplant-related mortality (TRM). In this study, we examined pretransplant serum samples derived from 92 consecutive allotransplant recipients with AML or MDS. Using non-targeted metabolomics, we identified 1274 metabolites including 968 of known identity (named biochemicals). We further investigated metabolites that differed significantly when comparing patients with and without early extensive fluid retention, pretransplant inflammation (both being associated with increased risk of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)/nonrelapse mortality) and development of systemic steroid-requiring acute GVHD (aGVHD). All three factors are associated with TRM and were also associated with significantly altered amino acid metabolism, though there was only a minor overlap between these three factors with regard to significantly altered individual metabolites. Furthermore, steroid-requiring aGVHD was especially associated with altered taurine/hypotaurine, tryptophan, biotin, and phenylacetate metabolism together with altered malate-aspartate shuttle and urea cycle regulation. In contrast, pretransplant inflammation was associated with a weaker modulation of many different metabolic pathways, whereas extensive fluid retention was associated with a weaker modulation of taurine/hypotaurine metabolism. An unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis based on the 13 most significantly identified metabolites associated with aGVHD identified a patient subset with high metabolite levels and increased frequencies of MDS/MDS-AML, steroid-requiring aGVHD and early TRM. On the other hand, a clustering analysis based on metabolites that were significantly altered for aGVHD, inflammation and fluid retention comparison groups identified a patient subset with a highly significant association with TRM. Our study suggests that the systemic pretransplant metabolic profiles can be used to identify patient subsets with an increased frequency of TRM.

Vaccine response after pneumococcal vaccination in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

Current guidelines for vaccination in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) recipients recommend initiation of pneumococcal vaccination series three to six months post-HCT, with most data supporting initiation at six months due to a more robust immune response. This single-center, retrospective, observational chart review aimed to evaluate the impact of initiating the pneumococcal vaccine series at three months post-HCT compared to six months post-HCT. The primary endpoints were defined as a percentage of patients with a serologic response of >1 and >1.3 µg/mL for over 50% of the defined serotypes. Outcomes showed no difference in immunologic response between the two groups.

Feasibility of a New Model of Care for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients Facilitated by eHealth: The MY-Medula Pilot Study

The use of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) for the treatment of hematologic diseases is steadily increasing; however, allo-SCT has the downside of causing considerable treatment-related morbidity and mortality. Mobile technology applied to healthcare (mHealth) has proven to be a cost-effective strategy to improve care and offer new services to people with multimorbidity, but there are little data on its usefulness in allo-SCT recipients. Here we describe a new integrated healthcare model facilitated by an mHealth platform, EMMASalud-MY-Medula, and to report the results of a feasibility and usability pilot study. The MY-Medula platform was developed in 4 phases. First, patient and healthcare professional needs were identified, and technological development and pretesting tests were conducted (phases 1 to 3, January 2016 to March 2021). Then a nonrandomized, prospective, observational, single-center pilot study was conducted (October 2021 to January 2022) at the adult SCT unit of a tertiary university hospital. Twenty-eight volunteer allo-SCT recipients were included in the pilot study, of whom one-half were outpatients in the first-year post-SCT and one-half were affected by steroid-dependent graft-versus-host disease (SR-GVHD). All patients used the MY-Medula app during the 2-month follow-up period, with a median number of visits to the app of 143 (range, 6 to 477). A total of 2067 self-monitoring records were created, and 205 text messages were received, most of them related to symptoms description (47%) and doubts about medication (21%). In 3.4% of the cases, drug dosage was adjusted by the pharmacist because of dosing errors or interactions. At the end of the study, a 6-question Likert-type questionnaire for patients and a 22-question test for healthcare professionals showed a high degree of satisfaction (95% and 100%, respectively) with the new healthcare pathway. Reengineering the follow-up of allo-SCT recipients into an integrated, multidisciplinary model of care facilitated by mHealth tools is feasible and has been associated with high usability and a high degree of satisfaction by patients and healthcare professionals. A randomized trial aiming to determine the cost-effectiveness of MY-Medula-based follow-up post-SCT is currently enrolling participants.

Cost-Effectiveness of Targeted Prophylaxis among Allogenic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

Bloodstream infections (BSI) are life-threatening complications for onco-hematologic patients. Fluoroquinolones prophylaxis (FQP) was recommended for patients with neutropenia. Later, it was correlated with increased resistance rates among this population and its role became debated. While the role of FQ prophylaxis is still being studied, its cost-effectiveness is also unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the costs and effects associated with two alternative strategies (FQP vs. no prophylaxis) for patients with hematological malignancies undergoing allogenic stem cell transplant (HSCT). A decision-tree model was built integrating retrospectively collected data from a single transplant center, part of a tertiary teaching hospital in Northern Italy. Probabilities, costs and effects were considered in the assessment of the two alternative strategies. Probabilities of colonization, BSIs, extended-spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) and Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) BSIs and mortality associated with infection, as well as median duration of length of stay (LOS) were calculated based on data collected between 2013 and 2021. The center applied the strategy of FQP between 2013 and 2016, and of no prophylaxis between 2016 and 2021. Data on 326 patients were collected during the considered time period. Overall, the rates of colonization, BSI, KPC/ESBL BSI, and mortality were 6.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.7-13.5), 42% (9.9-81.4) and 20.72 (16.67-25.26), respectively. A mean bed-day cost of 132€ was estimated. Considering no prophylaxis vs. prophylaxis, the difference in costs ranged between additional 33.61 and 80.59€ per patient, whereas the difference in effects ranged between 0.11 and 0.03 life-years (LYs) lost (around 40 and 11 days). Given the small differences in terms of costs and effects between the two strategies, no prophylaxis seems an appropriate choice. Furthermore, this analysis did not consider the broader effect on hospital ecology of multiple doses of FQP, which could provide further support for the strategy of no prophylaxis. Our results suggest that the necessity for FQP in onco-hematologic setting should be determined based on local antibiotic resistance patterns.

A 16-month-long experience of COVID-19 in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: An SFGM-TC multicentre cohort study.

This 16-month-long multicentre retrospective study of 225 allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) recipients with COVID-19 examines risk factors for severity and mortality, describing the successive waves of infections (from March to June 2020 and from August 2020 to June 2021). We confirm the negative role of low respiratory tract disease and immunosuppressive treatment. We highlight significantly lower percentages of severe forms and COVID-19-related mortality during the second wave. Monthly comparative evolution of cases in alloHSCT recipients and in the French population shows a higher number of cases in alloHSCT recipients during the first wave and a decrease from February 2021.

Bacterial Bloodstream Infections after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Etiology, Risk Factors and Outcome in a Single-Center Study.

We performed an observational, retrospective, single-center study on patients undergoing allo-HSCT between 2004 and 2020 at the Stem Cell Transplant Unit in Turin to assess the incidence, etiology, and outcomes of BSIs and to explore any risk factors for bacteriaemia. We observed a total of 178 bacterial BSIs in our cohort of 563 patients, resulting in a cumulative incidence of 19.4%, 23.8%, and 28.7% at 30, 100, and 365 days, respectively. Among isolated bacteria, 50.6% were Gram positive (GPB), 41.6% were Gram negative (GNB), and 7.9% were polymicrobial infections. Moreover, BSI occurrence significantly influenced 1-year overall survival. High and very high Disease Risk Index (DRI), an haploidentical donor, and antibacterial prophylaxis were found as results as independent risk factors for bacterial BSI occurrence in multivariate analysis. In our experience, GNB have overwhelmed GPB, and fluoroquinolone prophylaxis has contributed to the emergence of MDR pathogens. Local resistance patterns and patients' characteristics should therefore be considered for better management of bacteremia in patients receiving an allogeneic HSCT.

Improved outcomes over time and higher mortality in CMV seropositive allogeneic stem cell transplantation patients with COVID-19; An infectious disease working party study from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry.

COVID-19 has been associated with high morbidity and mortality in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) recipients. This study reports on 986 patients reported to the EBMT registry during the first 29 months of the pandemic. The median age was 50.3 years (min - max; 1.0 - 80.7). The median time from most recent HCT to diagnosis of COVID-19 was 20 months (min - max; 0.0 - 383.9). The median time was 19.3 (0.0 - 287.6) months during 2020, 21.2 (0.1 - 324.5) months during 2021, and 19.7 (0.1 - 383.9) months during 2022 (p = NS). 145/986 (14.7%) patients died; 124 (12.6%) due to COVID-19 and 21 of other causes. Only 2/204 (1%) fully vaccinated patients died from COVID-19. There was a successive improvement in overall survival over time. In multivariate analysis, increasing age (p<.0001), worse performance status (p<.0001), contracting COVID-19 within the first 30 days (p<.0001) or 30 - 100 days after HCT (p=.003), ongoing immunosuppression (p=.004), pre-existing lung disease (p=.003), and recipient CMV seropositivity (p=.004) had negative impact on overall survival while patients contracting COVID-19 in 2020 (p<.0001) or 2021 (p=.027) had worse overall survival than patients with COVID-19 diagnosed in 2022. Although the outcome of COVID-19 has improved, patients having risk factors were still at risk for severe COVID-19 including death.

Lessons learned: A look back at the performance of nine COVID-19 serologic assays and their proposed utility

BackgroundSerologic assays for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been proposed to assist with the acute diagnosis of infection, support epidemiological studies, identify convalescent plasma donors, and evaluate vaccine response. MethodsWe report an evaluation of nine serologic assays: Abbott (AB) and Epitope (EP) IgG and IgM, EUROIMMUN (EU) IgG and IgA, Roche anti-N (RN TOT) and anti-S (RS TOT) total antibody, and DiaSorin (DS) IgG. We evaluated 291 negative controls (NEG CTRL), 91 PCR positive (PCR POS) patients (179 samples), 126 convalescent plasma donors (CPD), 27 healthy vaccinated donors (VD), and 20 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients (45 samples). ResultsWe observed good agreement with the method performance claims for specificity (93–100%) in NEG CTRL but only 85% for EU IgA. The sensitivity claims in the first 2 weeks of symptom onset was lower (26–61%) than performance claims based on > 2 weeks since PCR positivity. We observed high sensitivities (94–100%) in CPD except for AB IgM (77%), EP IgM (0%). Significantly higher RS TOT was observed for Moderna vaccine recipients then Pfizer (p-values < 0.0001). A sustained RS TOT response was observed for the five months following vaccination. HSCT recipients demonstrated significantly lower RS TOT than healthy VD (p < 0.0001) at dose 2 and 4 weeks after. ConclusionsOur data suggests against the use of anti-SARS-CoV-2 assays to aid in acute diagnosis. RN TOT and RS TOT can readily identify past-resolved infection and vaccine response in the absence of native infection. We provide an estimate of expected antibody response in healthy VD over the time course of vaccination for which to compare antibody responses in immunosuppressed patients.

Nutritional Status of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients and Post-transplant Outcomes

This study investigated the relationship between nutritional status of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients pre-/post-transplant and outcomes post-transplant. A secondary data analysis was conducted of 18 patients 2-weeks pre-transplant and 3 weeks post-transplant. Nutrients/food servings analyzed from 24-dietary recalls were scored for diet quality, antioxidant status, and energy adequacy (≥75% of recommended targets). Patient outcomes included frequency/severity of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, mucositis, % weight change, acute graft vs. host disease (aGVHD), length of stay (LOS), hospital readmission, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and plasma albumin and cytokine levels. Pre-transplant, patients consumed more calories, total and saturated fat (% kcals) and less carbohydrate (% kcals) vs. post-transplant. Higher vs. lower pre-transplant diet quality was related to positive weight change (p <. 05), and greater interleukin-10 (p <. 05). Energy inadequacy pre-transplant was related to more aGVHD post-transplant (p < 0.05). Post-transplant, higher diet quality was related to greater plasma albumin (p <. 05), shorter LOS (p <. 05), no ICU admissions (p <. 01), and more GI symptoms (p <. 05); higher antioxidant status was related to greater albumin (p <. 05); and energy adequacy was related to shorter LOS (p <. 05). Optimizing dietary quality, antioxidant status and energy adequacy pre-/post -transport are important considerations to improve patient outcomes after HSCT.

Cost Effectiveness of Letermovir for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis Compared with Pre-Emptive Therapy in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients in the United States.

The aim of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of letermovir prophylaxis with the option for subsequent pre-emptive therapy (PET) for the prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection compared with a PET-only scenario in adult allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) recipients in the United States over a 10-year time horizon. A publicly available decision tree model was constructed using a commercial third-party payer perspective to simulate an allo-HCT recipient's clinical trajectory in the first-year post-transplant, followed by entry to a Markov model to simulate years 2 through 10. Clinical inputs and utility estimates were derived from published literature. Costs were derived from published literature and US Department of Veterans Affairs Federal Supply Schedule drug pricing. Outcomes assessed included life expectancy, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), direct medical costs, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed to test the robustness of the findings. Compared with PET alone, letermovir prophylaxis was projected to increase life-years per person (4.99 vs. 4.70 life-years), and increase QALYs (3.29 vs. 3.08) and costs (US$83.411 vs. US$70,698), yielding an ICER of US$59,356 per QALY gained. One-way sensitivity analyses indicated our model was sensitive to mortality (ICER: $164,771/QALY) and utility (letermovir ICER: $117,447/QALY; PET ICER: $107,290/QALY) in the first-year post-transplant. In 57.1% of the PSA simulations, letermovir was a cost-effective option using a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$100,000 per QALY. Letermovir prophylaxis is cost effective compared with PET alone with a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$100,000 per QALY gained. Sensitivity analysis results indicate future research is required to understand the impact of mortality and quality of life in the first-year post-transplant to arrive at a conclusive decision on letermovir adoption.

Clinical impact and early prediction of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients

Although antipseudomonal agents are administered in high-risk patients, no reports have focused on the risk of carbapenem-resistant (CR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients. We retrospectively studied a cohort of adult allo-HSCT recipients with P. aeruginosa bacteremia, focusing on a comparison between carbapenem-sensitive (CS) and CR P. aeruginosa after initiating conditioning chemotherapy at our institute between January 2005 and December 2020. The incidence, all-cause 30-day mortality of P. aeruginosa bacteremia, and risk factors for carbapenem resistance among patients with P. aeruginosa bacteremia in allo-HSCT recipients were evaluated. Forty-eight patients with P. aeruginosa bacteremia were included, with an incidence of 3.84/100 recipients (CS 1.92 vs. CR 1.92). The all-cause 30-day mortality was significantly higher in CR P. aeruginosa bacteremia (CS 4.2% vs. CR 39.1%; p = 0.003). The factor significantly associated with CR P. aeruginosa bacteremia was carbapenem use for at least three days within 30 days before the onset of bacteremia (odds ratio: 9.23, 95% confidence interval: 2.52-33.67). Inappropriate antimicrobial selection was significantly more frequent in CR P. aeruginosa bacteremia (CS 4.2% vs. CR 66.7%; p ˂ 0.001). Empirical combination therapy with reference to antimicrobial susceptibility profiles in each institution should be considered when CR P. aeruginosa bacteremia is suspected in allo-HSCT recipients based on the risk of carbapenem exposure.

Expansion of large granular lymphocytes after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Expansion of large granular lymphocytes (LGLs) is sometimes observed in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients, and is reported to be associated with a favorable transplant outcome. LGLs are also observed after autologous HSCT, but their clinical implications have not been well investigated. We retrospectively reviewed peripheral blood smears of consecutive autologous HSCT recipients. LGL lymphocytosis was defined as the observation of LGLs in the peripheral blood (> 20% white blood cells) in at least two consecutive blood tests. We evaluated the clinical impact of LGL lymphocytosis on autologous HSCT recipients. LGL lymphocytosis was observed in 18 of 197 patients (9.1%) who received autologous HSCT, at a median of 49 days after transplantation, with a median duration of 120.5 days. Incidence of cytomegalovirus reactivation was significantly higher in patients with LGL lymphocytosis than those without (16.7% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.038). No significant difference in survival rates was observed between groups (3 year OS 90.9% vs. 90.5%, p = 0.793 for lymphoma; 100 vs. 92.4%, p = 0.328 for myeloma). LGL lymphocytosis was observed in almost 10% of autologous HSCT recipients. In contrast to allogeneic HSCT, the duration of LGL was shorter and no significant improvement in survival was observed.

Prognostic factors for patients with hematologic malignancies admitted to the intensive care unit: is allogeneic transplantation still a risk factor?

The rate of intensive care unit (ICU) mortality in patients with hematologic malignancies is high. The risk factors for this were inconsistent across several previous studies, and there is currently no accepted consensus around risk factors for these patients. We aimed to identify which prognostic factors were associated with ICU mortality in critically ill patients with hematologic malignancies, nearly half of which were allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients. In addition, we aimed to compare the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with and without allogenic allo-HSCT. In total, 217 patients with hematologic malignancies were enrolled consecutive, 119 (54.8%) of whom underwent HSCT (allo-HSCT: n = 115). All survivors were followed up with until August 1, 2022. The rate of ICU mortality in this cohort was 54.4%: 55.5 and 53.1% for the patients with and without HSCT, respectively (p = 0.724). The probabilities of survival after ICU admission were also comparable between the patients who had allo-HSCT and those who did not. A multivariable analysis revealed that cerebrovascular disease, hyperlactic acidemia on the day of ICU admission, lower platelet count, use of vasoactive drugs, and absence of noninvasive ventilation on the day of ICU admission were independent risk factors for ICU mortality. For patients with three to five of these risk factors, the rate of ICU mortality was as high as 84.6%, which was significantly higher than that of other patients. In this study, the ICU mortality rate in patients with hematologic malignancies was still high, particularly for those with multiple risk factors. However, allo-HSCT was not found to be a risk factor for ICU mortality.

Prophylactic Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients During the Pre-engraftment Period

BackgroundOur institution has used trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) as the antibacterial agent of choice for infection prophylaxis during the pre-engraftment period in the allogeneic transplant (allo-HCT) population.MethodsThis retrospective, single center study was developed to compare the safety of that antibacterial prophylaxis to fluoroquinolones in allo-HCT. The primary endpoint was time to neutrophil engraftment.ResultsA total of 366 patients were reviewed (TMP-SMX n = 332, fluoroquinolone n = 34). No difference in days to neutrophil engraftment was found (median 15 versus 16 days, p = 0.62). Hyperkalemia was more common in the TMP-SMX cohort (32.2% versus 14.7%, p = 0.035); this did not contribute to a higher rate of agent discontinuation or arrhythmia. There was no significant difference in the incidence of neutropenic fever; however, those in the TMP-SMX cohort were more likely to have microbiologically confirmed bacteremia (24.1% versus 8.8% respectively, p = 0.043). There was no significant difference in infections. No long-term implication of prophylactic antibacterial agent selection was observed in terms of graft-versus-host-disease, underlying disease relapse, or mortality.ConclusionThe use of TMP-SMX was associated with a higher likelihood of bacteremia and hyperkalemia; however, this did not result in increased hospital stay, escalation of care, or mortality. The use of TMP-SMX for prophylaxis during the pre-engraftment period for allo-HCT recipients is safe and effective.

Human herpesvirus-6 in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: a prospective cohort study in Egypt

BackgroundImmunocompromised patients face reactivation of latent viruses that increase the risk of morbidity.AimThe study aimed to detect human herpes virus 6 (HHV-6) reactivation among allogeneic (allo) and autologous (auto) hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients and to correlate potentially attributed clinical manifestations to HHV-6 DNA plasma level.MethodsA prospective study included all (forty) patients undergoing allo and auto-HSCT from Jan 2020 till June 2022. Plasma samples were collected for HHV-6 serology, and for HHV-6 quantitative PCR at post-transplantation weeks 2, 4, 6. Demographic and clinical data were recorded.ResultsOut of 40 peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT) recipients, 34 (85%) were HHV-6 IgG positive pre-HSCT. Of which, fourteen patients (14/34, 41.2%) showed positive HHV-6 DNaemia. HHV-6 DNAemia (15/40, 37.5%) was significantly higher among allo (8/12, 66.7%) versus auto (7/28, 25%) HSCT recipients (p = 0.030). Patients with HHV-6 DNAemia developed fever, delayed engraftment and bone marrow suppression in 6/15, 40%, thrombocytopenia (5/15, 33.3%), rash and pneumonitis (2/15, 13.3%), acute GVHD (aGVHD) (1/15, 6.7%). HHV-6 DNAemia ranged from 101 to 102,000 copies/mL. Univariate analysis identified conditioning with busulfan–cyclophosphamide as a significant risk (p = 0.043), while receiving BEAM protocol was a protective factor (p = 0.045). In multivariate analysis, receiving BEAM protocol retained significance (p = 0.040).ConclusionFrequent HHV-6 reactivation was detected after HSCT, especially in allo-HSCT recipients with clinical manifestations which could not be otherwise explained. To our best knowledge this is the first study of HHV6 reactivation in HSCT recipients from Egypt. Raising awareness for HHV-6 reactivation manifestations and screening in HSCT recipients could be lifesaving.

Impact of Donor and Recipient SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination or Infection on Immunity after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

The role of donor and recipient Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) immunologic status pre-transplantation has not been fully investigated in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients. Given the poor immunogenicity to vaccines in this population and the serious outcomes of COVID-19, adoptive transfer of immunity may offer important insight into improving protection for this vulnerable population. In this study, we evaluated the role of adoptive transfer of immunity at 1 month post-transplantation and 6 months post-transplantation after vaccination of recipients, based on pre-transplantation severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination and infection exposures of both recipient and donor. Using banked specimens from related donor allogeneic HSCT recipients and clinical data from both donors and recipients, anti-Spike (S) IgG titers were analyzed at 1, 3, and 6 months post-transplantation according to prior SARS-CoV-2 immunologic exposures. Recipients were excluded if they had received SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies or had infection in the first 6 months post-transplantation. Of the 53 recipient-donor pairs, 29 donors and 24 recipients had prior SARS-CoV-2 immunologic exposure. Recipient-donor pairs with no prior SARS-CoV-2 exposure (D0R0) had significantly lower anti-S IgG titers at 1 month compared to those with prior exposures (D1R1) (D0R0: median, 2.43 [interquartile range (IQR), .41 to 3.77]; D1R1: median, 8.42; IQR, 5.58 to 12.20]; P=.008). At 6 months, anti-S IgG titers were higher in recipients who were vaccinated at 3 months post-transplantation in the D1R1 cohort (median IgG, 148.34; IQR, 92.36 to 204.33) compared with the D0R0 cohort (median IgG, 38.74; IQR, 8.93 to 119.71). Current strategies should be optimized to enhance SARS-CoV-2 protection for HSCT recipients, including augmentation of the immune response for both donors and recipients prior to transplantation.