Allergic Contact Dermatitis Research Articles

Patch Testing in Toilet Seat Dermatitis: A Case Series of Six Patients with Paediatric Atopic Dermatitis.

Toilet seat dermatitis (TSD) is a localized form of dermatitis that commonly occurs in the buttocks and upper posterior aspect of the thigh in school-going children. Previously, it was mostly seen due to allergic contact dermatitis to wood, but recently, many other allergens in toilet seats along with the possibility of irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) to detergents were reported. Six cases diagnosed clinically as atopic dermatitis per Hanifin and Rajka criteria presented with posterior thigh dermatitis. Patch testing using the Indian Standard Series, toilet seat scrapings, and detergents was conducted. Patch testing showed negative results at 48, 96, and 168 hours, including lesional site testing. Symptomatic management, including topical steroids and later tacrolimus, was administered, coupled with counselling on toilet seat cover use, with a follow-up after four weeks. Lesions showed resolution and reduced itching. This study's limitation lies in its small sample size from a single geographic area. Lesion resolution through topical treatment and toilet seat avoidance, support a diagnosis of contact dermatitis; however, the role of atopy remains crucial, suggesting a complex interplay. Larger studies are needed for a comprehensive understanding of this dermatological condition.

Preservative contact allergy in occupational dermatitis: a machine learning analysis.

Occupational dermatoses impose a significant socioeconomic burden. Allergic contact dermatitis related to occupation is prevalent among healthcare workers, cleaning service personnel, individuals in the beauty industry and industrial workers. Among risk factors, the exposure to preservatives is frequent, since they are extensively added in products for occupational use. The goal of this study is to investigate the contact allergy patterns in order to understand the linkage among hypersensitivity to preservatives, occupational profiles, patients' clinical and demographic characteristics. Patch test results were collected from monosensitized patients to Formaldehyde 2%, KATHON 0.02%, thimerosal 0.1%, and MDBGN 0.5%; information was also collected for an extended MOAHLFA (Male-Occupational-Atopic-Hand-Leg-Face-Age) index. To assess the relationship between allergen group and occupational-related ACD, the chi-square test for independence was utilized. To uncover underlying relationships in the data, multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) and categorical principal components analysis (CATPCA), which are machine learning approaches, were applied. Significant relationships were found between allergen group and: occupation class, atopy, hand, leg, facial, trunk, neck, head dermatitis, clinical characteristics, ICDRG 48h and ICDRG 72h clinical evaluation. MCA and CATPCA findings revealed a link among allergen group, occupation class, patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, the MOAHLFA index, and the ICDRG scores. Significant relationships were identified between the allergen group and various manifestations of dermatitis. The utilization of machine learning techniques facilitated the discernment of meaningful patterns in the data.

Patch Test Results with the Latin American Baseline Series in a Colombian Population. 2016-2021.

Background: Contact dermatitis (CD) is one of the most prevalent skin diseases. It is commonly divided into irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) and allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Patch testing is a procedure used to support the diagnosis of ACD. This test should be interpreted along with the clinical history and morphology of the skin lesions to determine clinical relevance. Objective: To describe the sensitization patterns of patients undergoing patch testing with the Latin American baseline series. Methods: A single-center retrospective study was performed. For the study, patients older than 18 years with a clinical diagnosis of contact dermatitis, who underwent patch testing using the Latin American baseline series were considered. These tests took place at the Alma Mater Hospital of Antioquia between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021. Results: A total of 648 patients were included. Patch tests were positive in 63% of cases, with a mean age of 51.5 years. Around 36.6% had atopy-related diseases. The main occupation was housework (30.7%). The hands were the most affected area in the body (31%). The main allergens were nickel sulfate (34%), sodium tetrachloropalladate (24.2%), and thimerosal (8.0%). Fifteen allergens had a percentage below 1%. Hydrocortisone and budesonide did not yield positive results. Conclusion: Nickel sulfate was the most frequent allergen, and women were the most affected. The information gathered could be useful for adjusting the allergens that should be included in the regional baseline series, taking into account the frequency found.

Allergic contact dermatitis from titanium secondary to surgical brow lift: A case‐report with 4‐year follow‐up

Allergic contact dermatitis from titanium secondary to surgical brow lift: A case‐report with 4‐year follow‐up

Epidemiological case-control study on contact sensitisation in female foot care specialists with occupational contact dermatitis: Patch test data of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK), 2008 to 2022.

Mainly women work as foot care specialists (FCS). They are at risk to develop occupational dermatitis (OD). The objective of this study is to describe the contact sensitisation pattern of female FCS with OD. In a retrospective study, patch test and clinical data collected by the Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) from 2008 to 2022 were analysed. Data of 116 female FCS with OD were compared with data of 13 930 female patients with OD working in other professions and 78 612 female patients without OD. Hand dermatitis (93.1%) was significantly more common and face dermatitis (0.9%) significantly less common in female FCS with OD compared to other female patients with or without OD. Frequent suspected allergen sources were disinfectants, gloves, leave-on and nail cosmetics. Occlusion and wetness were important co-factors. The most common diagnoses were irritant contact dermatitis (26.7%) and allergic contact dermatitis (21.6%). No sensitisation to any of the baseline series allergens was significantly more frequent in female FCS with OD than in the two control groups. However, sensitisations to allergens which FCS are abundantly exposed to, including fragrances, preservatives, rubber ingredients and disinfectants, were most common. FCS should be aware of the OD risk and prevention should be promoted.

Diagnosing contact dermatitis using machine learning: A review.

Machine learning (ML) offers an opportunity in contact dermatitis (CD) research, where with full clinical picture, may support diagnosis and patch test accuracy. This review aims to summarise the existing literature on how ML can be applied to CD in its entirety. Embase, Medline, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library were searched from inception to February 7, 2024, for primary literature reporting on ML models in CD. 7834 articles were identified in the search, with 110 moving to full-text review, and six articles included. Two used ML to identify key biomarkers to help distinguish between allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) and irritant contact dermatitis (ICD), three used image data to distinguish between ACD and ICD, and one used clinical and demographical data to predict the risk of positive patch tests. All studies used supervision in their ML model training with a total of 49 704 patients across all data sets. There was sparse reporting of the accuracy of these models. Although the available research is still limited, there is evidence to suggest that ML has potential to support diagnostic outcomes in a clinical setting. Further research on the use of ML in clinical practice is recommended.

Identification of the pigments used in permanent makeup and their ability to elicit allergic contact dermatitis

Decorative tattoos are known to contain ingredients that may elicit allergic contact dermatitis; it is less well-known if permanent makeup pigments carry the same risk. Identify pigments used in permanent makeup inks sold in the United States and review cases of allergic contact dermatitis to these pigments. Using internet searches, permanent makeup inks sold in the United States were identified. Safety data sheets were used to catalog pigments used in permanent makeup. A subsequent literature search was performed to identify cases of allergic contact dermatitis to these pigments. A total of 974 permanent makeup inks were reviewed, and 79 unique pigments were identified. The average product contained 4 pigments. Twenty of the pigments were inorganic metals, including carbon, iron, chromium, manganese, and molybdenum. Fifty-nine pigments were organic, of which most were azo, quinacridone, or anthraquinone dyes. A literature search revealed that 10 of the 79 pigments were associated with allergic contact dermatitis. Permanent makeup primarily uses organic pigments, although some metallic pigments are still used. Physicians should also be aware that some of these pigments-both organic and inorganic-are known causes of allergic contact dermatitis. Of note, patch testing to these ingredients can be negative.

Toll-Like Receptors and Contact Dermatitis.

Contact dermatitis (CD) is a common cutaneous inflammatory condition that affects millions of people worldwide. Xenobiotic agents are frequently encountered in substances used in everyday life, making it difficult to avoid personal and occupational exposure. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are transmembrane receptors that modulate the innate immune system in response to tissue injury or infection. TLRs play a key role in the pathophysiology of contact dermatitis. TLR signaling is involved in three major forms of CD: protein CD, allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), and irritant CD. Of the 10 TLRs found in humans, three play an important role in ACD. This makes TLRs a useful potential therapeutic target to consider against CD. In this review, we discuss the role of TLRs in CD and summarize current and emerging treatments for CD that target TLRs.

Contact sensitization and self-reported eczema in Swedish painters with occupational exposure to isothiazolinones.

Due to an increasing occupational usage of isothiazolinone (IT)-containing preservatives, and their potential to cause skin sensitization and allergic contact dermatitis, that is, chronic disease, there is a need for more knowledge on how highly exposed workers are affected. The overall objective was to explore dermatological symptoms of potentially long-lasting or chronic character in Swedish painters. Building painters from western and southern Sweden were initially invited to perform a questionnaire on occurrence of skin symptoms. Participants with affirmative responses, and the right inclusion criteria, were further invited to patch testing with four different ITs: benzisothiazolinone (BIT), methylisothiazolinone, methylchloroisothiazolinone and octylisothiazolinone. There was a tendency towards higher occurrence of positive patch test reactions among the painters compared with occupationally unexposed registry patients; however, not statistically significant differences. BIT was the substance most frequently causing positive test results in both groups. The occurrence of adult-onset eczema was higher in painters than in the control group of electricians, and just shy of statistical significance concerning any of several skin locations (face/legs/arms/hands). Building painters present with positive patch test reactions to common paint preservatives (ITs), and they report adult-onset eczema more often than do less occupationally exposed groups.

Machine Learning in Allergic Contact Dermatitis: Identifying (Dis)similarities between Polysensitized and Monosensitized Patients

Background: Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a delayed hypersensitivity reaction occurring in sensitized individuals due to exposure to allergens. Polysensitization, defined as positive reactions to multiple unrelated haptens, increases the risk of ACD development and affects patients’ quality of life. The aim of this study is to apply machine learning in order to analyze the association between ACD, polysensitization, individual susceptibility, and patients’ characteristics. Methods: Patch test results and demographics from 400 ACD patients (Study protocol Nr. 3765/2022), categorized as polysensitized or monosensitized, were analyzed. Classic statistical analysis and multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) were utilized to explore relationships among variables. Results: The findings revealed significant associations between patient characteristics and ACD patterns, with hand dermatitis showing the strongest correlation. MCA provided insights into the complex interplay of demographic and clinical factors influencing ACD prevalence. Conclusion: Overall, this study highlights the potential of machine learning in unveiling hidden patterns within dermatological data, paving the way for future advancements in the field.

Relationship between Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Use Behavior and Working Period with Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD) Symptoms in Workers at Mabar Shrimp Factory

Background. Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is one of the most common occupational skin diseases after irritant contact dermatitis (ICD). One of the factors causing ACD is not using personal protective equipment (PPE) and a long working period. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between PPE use behavior and working period with ACD symptoms in workers at the Mabar shrimp factory, Medan. Method. Cross-sectional research with a consecutive sampling method. Assessment of PPE use behavior and working period used a questionnaire and ACD symptoms by a doctor. The analysis used was univariate and bivariate analysis with chi-square. Results. The total number of samples that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study was 100 people, 28 people had symptoms of ACD, enough knowledge, good attitudes, and unfavorable actions with a working period of >2 years. Statistical analysis showed a relationship between PPE use behavior and working period with ACD symptoms. Conclusion. All behavioral factors (knowledge, attitude, and action) and working period have a significant relationship with ACD symptoms

Deriving a point of departure for assessing the skin sensitization risk of wearable device constituents with in vitro methods

Wearable devices are in contact with the skin for extended periods. As such, the device constituents should be evaluated for their skin sensitization potential, and a Point of Departure (PoD) should be derived to conduct a proper risk assessment. Without historical in vivo data, the PoD must be derived with New Approach Methods (NAMs). To accomplish this, regression models trained on LLNA data that use data inputs from OECD-validated in vitro tests were used to derive a predicted EC3 value, the LLNA value used to classify skin sensitization potency, for three adhesive monomers (Isobornyl acrylate (IBOA), N, N- Dimethylacrylamide (NNDMA), and Acryloylmorpholine (ACMO) and one dye (Solvent Orange 60 (SO60)). These chemicals can be used as constituents of wearable devices and have been associated with causing allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Using kinetic DPRA and KeratinoSens™ data, the PoDs obtained with the regression model were 180, 215, 1535, and 8325 μg/cm2 for IBOA, SO60, ACMO, and NNDMA, respectively. The PoDs derived with the regression model using NAMs data will enable a proper skin sensitization risk assessment without using animals.

Contact Dermatitis Due to Hair Care Products: A Comprehensive Review

Hair cosmetics are in fashion. Numerous products are commonly used in combination. Frequent allergens are present in hair cosmetics, which, with almost daily use, increase the risk of sensitization. Familiarity with the clinical distribution of the eczematous rash is necessary to seriously consider patch testing. Not all the products on the market are haptens. It is necessary to know how to patch your own products. When avoidance of the allergen is not possible, new treatments are evaluated to combat allergic contact dermatitis, mainly of the occupational type. In this manuscript, a complete and practical review of the main allergens and contact sources of hair cosmetic origin has been carried out.

ALLERGIC CONTACT DERMATITIS AND ATOPIC DERMATITIS: HIGHLIGHTS OF THE OVERLAP SYNDROME

Introduction. The combination of atopic dermatitis (AD) with allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) or the occurrence of ACD on the background of atopic dermatitis is called the overlap syndrome. Studies have demonstrated several reasons why patients with AD have a similar or even increased risk of developing ACD compared to those without AD. Allergens and haptens are trigger factors in a group of patients with AD and ACD overlap syndrome. The aim of the study. To confirm the diagnosis of ACD in a group of patients with AD – diagnose the overlap syndrome and analyze which allergens and haptens were the trigger factors in this group. Materials and methods. To confirm IgE-dependent sensitization in atopic dermatitis, skin prick tests or determination of specific IgE in blood serum were performed. Skin patch tests (European series S-1000) were performed to determine the mechanisms of delayed-type hypersensitivity. Results. It was found that the highest specific weight of positive allergic reactions has been recorded in response to the following allergens: ticks, ticks/ambrosia, birch and mold. The absolute majority of patients demonstrated positive specific IgE-dependent sensitization to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Dermatophagoides farinae – 24 (50%), in turn, on Ambrósia – 14 (29.2%), and on Alternaria alternata – 8 (16.7%). Also, the reaction was most often recorded to haptens: cobalt, nickel, formaldehyde, PPD, textile dyes. Deterioration of the clinical course and shortening of AD remission periods were observed due to the formation of ACD against the background of impaired skin barrier function and the presence of chronic immune inflammation. Conclusions. Patients with AD are more often diagnosed with ACD, which predictably worsens the course of AD. Patients with confirmed overlap syndrome "AD + ACD" most often show reactions to haptens: Cobalt, Nikel, Formaldehyde, PPD, Textile dye mix – and in the vast majority to 2 haptens or more in one patient.

Étude rétrospective (2007–2022) des causes de dermatites allergiques de contact en Algérie identifiées par la batterie standard européenne : à propos de 202 cas

The European Baseline Series (EBS) of patch tests is the essential tool for allergological exploration of patients suspected of allergic contact dermatitis. The main objective of our study was to define the epidemiological, clinical characteristics, and sensitization profile to contact allergens of the EBS among all patients who underwent contact allergological exploration in an allergology clinic in Algeria over a 15-year period (from 2007 to 2022). Our aim was to generate a map of allergic contact dermatitis in Eastern Algeria to support prevention efforts on a national scale. MethodsOur study was a retrospective descriptive monocentric study conducted in an allergology and contact allergen exploration medical office in Constantine, Algeria. It included all EBS performed between March 2007 and February 2022 on patients who were either first-time visitors or referred for patch testing. ResultsA total of 202 patients suspected of contact dermatitis were tested, with ages ranging from 3 to 75 years. Among them, 125 were female (61.9%) and 77 were male (38.1%). Of these, 138 patients (68.8%) (45 males, 93 females) tested positive for one or more allergens. Fifty-eight patients (42%) had a positive reaction to more than two contact allergens. The most common positive reactions were observed with nickel (30.2%), cobalt (28.2%), potassium dichromate (27.2%), myroxylon pereirae (9.9%), and fragrance mix I (8.4%). Sensitivity to nickel was more frequent among females (P < 0.0001), while sensitivity to potassium dichromate was more frequent among males (P = 0.01). ConclusionsThe distribution of different causes of contact allergy identified through EBS was similar to what is observed in Europe. It allowed us to define, based on the sensitization profile of the patients included in our study, the most frequent causes of allergic contact dermatitis within our population. However, the emergence of new contact allergens can only be identified if Algeria establishes an allergo-vigilance network, similar to that in Europe, enabling both the evolution of patch test compositions and the detection of new allergic risks within the population.

Differential diagnosis of contact dermatitis: A practical-approach review by the EADV Task Force on contact dermatitis.

The diagnosis of eczema ('dermatitis') is mostly clinical and depends on the clinical history and exploratory objective findings (primary lesions, patterns). Contact dermatitis remains as an important condition in the group of eczematous disorders, with important socioeconomic and occupational relevance. Although irritant and allergic contact dermatitis have a different pathogenesis, both are characterized by a rather typical morphology, are triggered by external factors and tend to occur primarily in the area of contact with the exogenous agent. In addition, allergic and irritant dermatitis may also co-exist. The importance of diagnosing contact dermatitis, especially when allergic in nature, is both due to the possibility of avoiding the trigger, and due to its role in aggravating other skin conditions. Nevertheless, the heterogeneity of clinical presentations in daily practice may pose an important challenge for the suspicion and correct diagnosis of contact dermatitis. Furthermore, other conditions, with different pathogenesis and treatment, may clinically simulate contact dermatitis. The Task Force aims to conduct a review of the unifying clinical features of contact dermatitis and characterize its main clinical phenotypes, and its simulators, in order to contribute to an early suspicion or recognition of contact dermatitis and enable a correct differential diagnosis.

Peculiar Pattern of Irritant Contact Dermatitis to Semecarpus anacardium

Abstract Semecarpus anacardium (Family: Anacardiaceae), is a frequently used medicinal plant in alternative medicine. There has been few case reports suggesting the role of marking nut extract in allergic contact dermatitis. Case one presented with vesicles coalescing to form bullae with surrounding necrotic epidermis accompanied by itching and burning sensation over nape of neck. He developed recurrent urticarial episodes post treatment. Case two reported similar lesions over beard region after 2 weeks of our index case in addition to diffuse erythematous maculopapular pruritic rash over upper chest, face and anterior shoulder. Case three, four and five reported with similar kind of lesions over various body parts. Case six presented with targetoid lesion with central bullae over upper torso. Case seven reported with bizarre lesions like splattering of chemical which were morphologically similar as the other cases, over left popliteal fossa and calf area. Our cases were from the same geographic area and were in the same profession. On evaluation of the pattern and morphology of lesions and careful investigation, it was concluded that it was an irritant reaction to Semicarpus nut extract which was supported by histopathology findings. On further probing, it was observed that the individuals inflicted the injury in order to avoid some strenuous work. All were evaluated and none of them were found to be suffering from any psychiatric ailment. We reported this case series because of unique morphological presentation which has not yet been reported in the literature to the best of our knowledge.

Suture-Induced Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Polypropylene.

Suture-Induced Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Polypropylene.

Patch test in Brazilian children with a clinical diagnosis of atopic dermatitis: a cross-sectional study using an extended patch test battery.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic and relapsing inflammatory skin disease mainly affecting children. Similarly, Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is an inflammatory skin disease, but unlike AD it results from direct exposure to an external agent. Theoretically, the impaired skin barrier facilitates the penetration of potential allergens. Therefore, AD patients are at risk for an associated ACD, exacerbating their skin condition. Because eczema is similar, performing a patch test (PT) for the differential diagnosis is essential. In this cross-sectional transversal study, we performed a PT with 30 sensitizers in 26 children with AD, selected according to established criteria for suspected ACD, and treated at an AD center of a pediatric university hospital in Rio de Janeiro. Clinical presentation, patient profile, main sensitizers, and frequency of ACD caused by therapeutic skincare products were evaluated. In all, 23 (88.5%) patients reacted to at least one allergen, 21 (80.7%) had a relevant positive patch test, and 15 (57.7%) were polysensitized. The main positive sensitizers were nickel (38.5%), blue disperse (30.8%), fragrance mix (30.8%), and neomycin (23.1%). Nineteen (73%) patients reacted to substances present in therapeutic or skincare products. Our data underscore the importance of performing a PT in AD children whose eczema has atypical distribution. The expressive percentage of positive tests, especially of allergens in skincare products, indicates the constant need to review the proposed treatments. Therefore, we recommend a specific and expanded PT battery for pediatric AD patients, including a negative control, to increase sensitivity for diagnosing ACD.

Clinico-epidemiological and Patch Test Profile of Patients with Suspected Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Cosmetics in a Tertiary Care Hospital in the Southern Philippines: A 3-year Retrospective Study

Background: Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a common skin inflammatory reaction occurring at the site of challenge with a contact allergen in sensitized individuals and one of the most common causes for consultation in dermatology clinics. Patch testing is a method for detecting the causative component in suspected cases of ACD. Awareness about the causative allergen aids in reducing morbidity and can significantly minimize the impact of ACD in the affected people. Objectives: The study aimed to measure the number of relevant positive reactions in patch tests being performed in our institution in patients with ACD to cosmetic products. Methods: A total of 60 patients who were diagnosed with ACD to cosmetics and underwent patch testing were reviewed to identify the clinico-epidemiological and patch test profiles of these patients. Results: The study showed that the mean age of patients was 42 comprising mostly of females. Most of the patients were unemployed, office workers, and medical workers. The most common cosmetic products that caused ACD include soaps, shampoos, lotions, and moisturizers. Nickel is still the most tested positive among these patients, followed by fragrance mixes and 4-phenylenediamine base. They are widely distributed in cosmetic products, especially in soaps and lotions. The pattern of dermatitis revealed facial dermatitis to be the most common reason for consult of these patients. Conclusion: Patch test is valuable in the setting of establishing the etiology of ACD to cosmetic products.