You have accessJournal of UrologyTrauma/Reconstruction/Diversion: Urethral Reconstruction (including Stricture, Diverticulum) II1 Apr 2016MP52-04 A NOVEL USE OF METHYLENE BLUE IN ANTERIOR URETHROPLASTY Sanjay kulkarni, Pankaj Joshi, Sandesh Surana, Atef Homuda, and Jyotsna Kulkarni Sanjay kulkarniSanjay kulkarni More articles by this author , Pankaj JoshiPankaj Joshi More articles by this author , Sandesh SuranaSandesh Surana More articles by this author , Atef HomudaAtef Homuda More articles by this author , and Jyotsna KulkarniJyotsna Kulkarni More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.480AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The use of methylene blue (MB) to highlight anatomic structures in Urology is a well-established practice. A narrow urethral plate can be difficult to properly locate intraoperatively, particularly in Panurethral strictures. Our objective is to assess the value of intraurethral injection of MB during urethroplasty. METHODS 5 cc of MB (10mg/ml) is diluted in 10 cc of normal saline. The MB is gently injected retrograde into the urethra. A penile clamp is applied for 5 minutes to increase the contact time of the MB with the urethra. The urethroplasty commenced and the urethra was opened. The impact of the MB on the anatomy of the urethra was by subjective assessment of a single surgeon (S.B.K.). RESULTS 492 consecutive cases were prospectively evaluated from 2010-2014. Precise staining of the narrow lumen was successfully observed in 464 (94%). In these 464 cases, the diseased urethral strictured portion of the urethra was stained blue with MB. The grossly normal appearing urothelium remained pink and did not take up significant MB stain. Both stained and unstained mucosa was sent for histopathology examination in representative 20 patients. Blue stained urethra showed evidence of stricture in all patients. Unstained samples showed normal urethra. In 28 (6%) cases minimal or no staining was observed. Extravasation in to the spongiosa was seen in 8 (2%) cases. In 22 (4%) cases there was dense staining distal to the narrow lumen. There were no known allergic complications. CONCLUSIONS Normal urothelium does not absorb urine or water, and dilute MB flows over normal epithelium without staining. MB readily stains diseased and strictured urothelium. Intraurethral injection of MB is a useful tool in urethroplasty. It helps in delineation of stricture and identifying lumen. It guides us to the exact area of urethra to be augmented which has been corroborated with histopathology. It is a simple, non-costly and non-invasive tool. In our high volume tertiary referral unit, it is now standard to inject methylene blue in urethra immediately prior to urethroplasty. © 2016FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 195Issue 4SApril 2016Page: e690 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2016MetricsAuthor Information Sanjay kulkarni More articles by this author Pankaj Joshi More articles by this author Sandesh Surana More articles by this author Atef Homuda More articles by this author Jyotsna Kulkarni More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract