All-oral Regimens Research Articles

Safety and Efficacy of Tucatinib, Letrozole, and Palbociclib in Patients with Previously Treated HR+/HER2+ Breast Cancer.

To overcome resistance to antihormonal and HER2-targeted agents mediated by cyclin D1-CDK4/6 complex, we proposed an oral combination of the HER2 inhibitor tucatinib, aromatase inhibitor letrozole, and CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib (TLP combination) for treatment of HR+/HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Phase Ib/II TLP trial (NCT03054363) enrolled patients with HR+/HER2+ MBC treated with ≥2 HER2-targeted agents. The phase Ib primary endpoint was safety of the regimen evaluated by NCI CTCAE version 4.3. The phase II primary endpoint was efficacy by median progression-free survival (mPFS). Forty-two women ages 22 to 81 years were enrolled. Patients received a median of two lines of therapy in the metastatic setting, 71.4% had visceral disease, 35.7% had CNS disease. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AE) of grade ≥3 were neutropenia (64.3%), leukopenia (23.8%), diarrhea (19.0%), and fatigue (14.3%). Tucatinib increased AUC10-19 hours of palbociclib 1.7-fold, requiring palbociclib dose reduction from 125 to 75 mg daily. In 40 response-evaluable patients, mPFS was 8.4 months, with similar mPFS in non-CNS and CNS cohorts (10.0 months vs. 8.2 months; P = 0.9). Overall response rate was 44.5%, median duration of response was 13.9 months, and clinical benefit rate was 70.4%; 60% of patients were on treatment for ≥6 months, 25% for ≥1 year, and 10% for ≥2 years. In the CNS cohort, 26.6% of patients remained on study for ≥1 year. TLP combination was safe and tolerable. AEs were expected and manageable with supportive therapy and dose reductions. TLP showed excellent efficacy for an all-oral chemotherapy-free regimen warranting further testing. See related commentary by Huppert and Rugo, p. 4993.

Investigation of novel HCV therapies: Boscia angustifalia &Boscia senegalensis extracts loaded on galactosylated chitosan nanoparticles synthesized by eco-friendly method for HCV treatment

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major causative agent of chronic liver diseases including chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma worldwide. Treatment of HCV has evolved from early interferon monotherapy to the current all-oral regimens using direct-acting antivirals. However, antiviral resistance has become a critical issue in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C after receiving therapy with direct-acting antivirals (DAA) with a 0.5 % chance of the hepatitis C virus recurrence, similar to other chronic viral infections. So, retreatment options following treatment failure have become crucial issues. Hence, this study aims to investigate a new promising therapy for HCV. In the field of nanomedicine, chitosan nanoparticles are well-known delivery systems that are frequently used as polymeric carriers. Galactosylated chitosan nanoparticles have been widely applied in HCV treatment. In this study, we have modified galactosylation by an eco-friendly method using l-ascorbic instead of hazardous reagents and we have loaded it with newly tested two Boscia extracts each in three different concentrations. The synthesized chitosan nanoparticles showed two dispersion peaks, at 196 ± 29 nm and 1.33 ± 0.36 μm, with a zeta potential of +3.3 ± 0.4mV with high stability in a range of 40.7 mV. The percentage of encapsulation of Boscia angustifalia extract was found to be 46.58 ± 1.33 % and for Boscia senegalensis extract was 9.77 ± 0.33 %. The release of Boscia angustifalia extract from the nanoparticles was about 40 % in acidic media after 180 min and about 60 % in normal pH. However, the release of Boscia senegalensis extract was 20 % in acidic media and 56 % in normal media after 24 h. Testing of these two newly developed composites against HCV was carried out using an in vitro system for the production of hepatitis C virus (HCV) which was established by infection of human hepatoma cells. Evidence for persistent virus production was monitored by the ELISA technique using an anti-HCV-specific antibody. Results obtained showed that all samples had an anti-HCV activity that increased by increasing concentration, and Boscia angustifalia had remarkable anti-HCV activity compared to Boscia senegalensis.

Evaluating the effectiveness and safety of a short and all-oral treatment regimen for the management of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in Cameroon

Evaluating the effectiveness and safety of a short and all-oral treatment regimen for the management of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in Cameroon

Results from a phase (Ph) 1 clinical study of the all-oral regimen of CC-486 and venetoclax for acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

7034 Background: Venetoclax (Ven) with azacitidine (Aza) is the standard of care for newly diagnosed AML patients who are unfit for intensive induction chemotherapy. It is well known that this treatment also has activity in the relapsed and refractory (R/R) setting. However, this regimen requires seven consecutive daily SQ or IV doses of Aza each month. The relative inconvenience of this, and its negative impact on quality of life, may lead to its early discontinuation, possibly decreasing the overall efficacy of this regimen. An all-oral regimen may decrease infusion center visits, and potentially increase the efficacy of the regimen due to improved compliance. CC-486 is the oral formulation of Aza that is currently approved for post-induction chemotherapy maintenance in AML. Methods: This is a single center open label, Ph 1 study investigating CC-486 and Ven in R/R AML patients. In the dose escalation phase, subjects received CC-486 at one of two cohorts (200 mg PO days 1-14 and 300 mg PO days 1-14). Ven was given at the 400 mg/day PO regimen, for 28 days, after an initial intra-patient dose escalation per the standard of care. Using a 3+3 study design for the two cohorts, we aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CC-486 in combination with Ven. An expansion cohort is planned for 10 patients treated at the MTD. Results: As of February 1, 2023, 8 patients have been accrued. The average age at the time of enrollment was 64, and median prior treatment regimens was 1 (range 1-3). Four patients had received Ven in prior treatments. In cohort 1, there were no DLT events. There have been no DLT events in 5/6 patients enrolled in cohort 2. The most common hematologic toxicities were Gr 3-4 neutropenia (n = 7, 88%), Gr 3-4 anemia (n = 6, 75%), and Gr 3-4 thrombocytopenia (n = 4, 50%). The most common non-hematologic toxicities were Gr 1-2 nausea (n = 4, 50%), Gr 1-2 fatigue (n = 2, 25%), and Gr 1-2 diarrhea (n = 2, 25%). Best responses were complete remission (CR) (n = 2, 25%), partial remission (PR) (n = 1, 13%), and stable disease (SD) (n = 2, 25%). Three patients proceeded to an allogeneic stem cell transplant. Conclusions: CC-486 and Ven is an all-oral regimen being investigated for the treatment of R/R AML. Our Ph 1 dose escalation thus far has demonstrated a favorable safety profile for this regimen. Full Ph 1 findings and the MTD will be presented at the meeting. Responses have been seen in both dose cohorts, and patients have been bridged to hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Clinical trial information: NCT05287568 . [Table: see text]

Implementation of Bedaquiline, Pretomanid, and Linezolid in the United States: Experience Using a Novel All-Oral Treatment Regimen for Treatment of Rifampin-Resistant or Rifampin-Intolerant Tuberculosis Disease.

Rifampin-resistant tuberculosis is a leading cause of morbidity worldwide; only one-third of persons start treatment, and outcomes are often inadequate. Several trials demonstrate 90% efficacy using an all-oral, 6-month regimen of bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid (BPaL), but significant toxicity occurred using 1200-mg linezolid. After US Food and Drug Administration approval in 2019, some US clinicians rapidly implemented BPaL using an initial 600-mg linezolid dose adjusted by serum drug concentrations and clinical monitoring. Data from US patients treated with BPaL between 14 October 2019 and 30 April 2022 were compiled and analyzed by the BPaL Implementation Group (BIG), including baseline examination and laboratory, electrocardiographic, and clinical monitoring throughout treatment and follow-up. Linezolid dosing and clinical management was provider driven, and most patients had linezolid adjusted by therapeutic drug monitoring. Of 70 patients starting BPaL, 2 changed to rifampin-based therapy, 68 (97.1%) completed BPaL, and 2 of the 68 (2.9%) experienced relapse after completion. Using an initial 600-mg linezolid dose daily adjusted by therapeutic drug monitoring and careful clinical and laboratory monitoring for adverse effects, supportive care, and expert consultation throughout BPaL treatment, 3 patients (4.4%) with hematologic toxicity and 4 (5.9%) with neurotoxicity required a change in linezolid dose or frequency. The median BPaL duration was 6 months. BPaL has transformed treatment for rifampin-resistant or intolerant tuberculosis. In this cohort, effective treatment required less than half the duration recommended in 2019 US guidelines for drug-resistant tuberculosis. Use of individualized linezolid dosing and monitoring likely enhanced safety and treatment completion. The BIG cohort demonstrates that early implementation of new tuberculosis treatments in the United States is feasible.

All-oral low-dose chemotherapy TEPIP is effective and well-tolerated in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a rare and heterogenous hematologic malignancy with poor prognosis especially in elderly and frail patients who are not eligible for intensive treatment. The resulting palliative setting necessitates tolerable but effective schedules for outpatient treatment. TEPIP is a locally developed, all-oral low-dose regimen comprising trofosfamide, etoposide, procarbazine, idarubicin, and prednisolone. In this observational retrospective, single-center study, the safety and efficacy of TEPIP was evaluated in 12 patients (pts.) with PTCL treated at the University Medical Center Regensburg between 2010 and 2022. The endpoints were overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS), and adverse events were individually reported according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria. The enrolled cohort was characterized by advanced age (median 70 years), extensive disease (100% Ann Arbor ≥stage 3), and poor prognosis (75% high/high-intermediate international prognostic index). The most common subtype was angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (8/12), and 11/12 patients had relapsed or refractory disease at TEPIP onset with a median of 1.5 prior treatment regimens. After a median of 2.5 TEPIP cycles (total of 83 cycles), the ORR was 42% (complete remission 25%), and the OS reached a median of 185 days. Any grade of adverse event (AE) occurred in 8/12 patients, with four patients showing AE ≥CTCAE grade 3 (33%), and the AEs were mainly non-hematological. TEPIP demonstrated competitive efficacy with a tolerable safety profile in a highly palliative cohort of patients with difficult-to-treat PTCL. The all-oral application, which makes outpatient treatment possible, is particularly noteworthy.

Children deserve simple, short, safe, and effective treatment for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis

Children deserve simple, short, safe, and effective treatment for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis

Development of low-cost, weight-adjustable clofazimine mini-tablets for treatment of tuberculosis in pediatrics

Clofazimine (CFZ) is an important component of the World Health Organization's (WHO) recommended all-oral drug regimen for treatment of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). However, the lack of a dividable oral dosage form has limited the use of the drug in pediatric populations, who may require lowering of the dose to reduce the likelihood of adverse drug events. In this study, pediatric-friendly CFZ mini-tablets were prepared from micronized powder via direct compression. Rapid disintegration and maximized dissolution in GI fluids was achieved using an iterative formulation design process. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of the optimized mini-tablets were obtained in Sprague-Dawley rats and compared against an oral suspension of micronized CFZ particles to examine the effect of processing and formulation on the oral absorption of the drug. Differences in maximum concentration and area under the curve between the two formulations were non-significant at the highest dosing level tested. Variability between rats prevented bioequivalence from being determined according to guidelines outlined by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). These studies provide an important proof-of-concept for an alternative, low-cost formulation and processing approach for the oral delivery of CFZ in manner that is suitable for children as young as 6 months of age.

At Long Last: Short, All-Oral Regimens for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in the United States.

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) has historically required longer treatment regimens that were associated with higher unfavorable outcomes and side effects rates compared with drug susceptible TB (DS-TB). During the last decade, several studies conducted mostly in high-incidence settings have shown that MDR-TB can be successfully treated using all-oral shorter regimens of 6- to 9-month duration. In this article, we review the evolution of MDR-TB treatment from the early long regimens with injectables agents (IAs), followed by the shorter regimens with IA, to the groundbreaking, all-oral, 6- to 9-month regimens. Finally, we propose a framework for implementation of the shorter all-oral regimens in the United States.

Literature Highlights.

Literature Highlights is a digest of notable papers recently published in the leading respiratory journals. Coverage includes a 6-month, all-oral regimen for rifampicin-resistant TB; phase 3 trials of two shorter regimen for drug-resistant TB; heterogeneity in M. tuberculosis transmission through whole-genome sequencing; vaping and pulmonary inflammation; impact of COVID-19 during pregnancy on mother and newborn; migrants and TB.

Assessment of Amikacin- and Capreomycin-Related Adverse Drug Reactions in Patients with Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis and Exploring the Role of Genetic Factors.

Following the introduction of all-oral treatment regimens for patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB), second-line injectable drug applications have been reduced in the last few years. However, they are still important for anti-TB therapy. This study aims to analyze the occurrence of amikacin- and capreomycin-related adverse drug reactions (ADR) in patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) and evaluate the role of multiple patient-, disease-, and therapy-related factors on the frequency of the observed adverse events. In addition, the possible role of genetic risk factors was studied by full-length mitochondrial DNA sequencing. Toward this aim, we retrospectively evaluated 47 patients with MDR-TB who received amikacin and/or capreomycin. In total, 16 (34.0%) patients developed ototoxicity and 13 (27.7%) developed nephrotoxicity, including 3 (6.4%) patients who experienced both adverse events. Ototoxicity development was more common in patients who received amikacin. No other factors showed a significant impact. Nephrotoxicity was likely associated with previous renal health impairment. Full mitochondrial genome sequencing did not reveal any specific ADR-associated variants, and results showed no differences in adverse event occurrence for any specific variants, mutation count, or mitochondrial haplogroup. The absence of the previously reported ototoxicity-related mtDNA variants in our patients with ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity highlighted the complex nature of the ADR occurrence.

Use of Short Oral Regimens for Treatment of Drug Resistant Tuberculosis in a Patient with HIV Infection

We present the clinical case of effective treatment of tuberculosis in a patient with disseminated pulmonary and extrapulmonary pre-extensive drug resistant tuberculosis, HIV-infection and other severe opportunistic and concomitant infections. Short all-oral regimen has been used for the treatment. This clinical case demonstrates the clinical efficacy of modern treatment regimens, good compatibility with other drugs and management of adverse events without treatment interruption.

Ixazomib, Oral Metronomic Cyclophosphamide, and Dexamethasone for First-Line Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: A Phase II Brown University Oncology Group Study.

Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients have many available treatment options. While lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVD) is the preferred initial treatment for many patients, several other agents may provide similar efficacy with less toxicity and improved ease of administration. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the all-oral regimen of ixazomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone with the use of metronomic cyclophosphamide dosing in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. The study was stopped prior to planned enrollment due to slow recruitment, with 12 patients available for final analysis. The overall response rate was 58.3% with 2 patients achieving a very good partial response (16.7%) and 5 patients achieving a partial response (41.7%). Median progression-free survival was 16 months, and median overall survival was 43 months. There were no episodes of grade 3 or greater peripheral neuropathy. Grade 3 or greater dermatologic toxicity was experienced in 50% of patients. Although limited enrollment prevented full efficacy evaluation, our data do not support further study of metronomic cyclophosphamide in combination with ixazomib and dexamethasone in the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. The activity of this regimen in the relapsed/refractory setting requires further study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02412228).

Multidrug-Resistant TB (MDR-TB) and Extensively Drug-Resistant TB (XDR-TB) Among Children: Where We Stand Now.

Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) has continued to be a global health cataclysm. It is an arduous condition to tackle but is curable with the proper choice of drug and adherence to the drug therapy. WHO has introduced newer drugs with all-oral shorter regimens, but the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the achievements and raised the severity. The COVID-19 controlling mechanism is based on social distancing, using face masks, personal protective equipment, medical glove, head shoe cover, face shield, goggles, hand hygiene, and many more. Around the globe, national and international health authorities impose lockdown and movement control orders to ensure social distancing and prevent transmission of COVID-19 infection. Therefore, WHO proposed a TB control program impaired during a pandemic. Children, the most vulnerable group, suffer more from the drug-resistant form and act as the storehouse of future fatal cases. It has dire effects on physical health and hampers their mental health and academic career. Treatment of drug-resistant cases has more success stories in children than adults, but enrollment for treatment has been persistently low in this age group. Despite that, drug-resistant childhood tuberculosis has been neglected, and proper surveillance has not yet been achieved. Insufficient reporting, lack of appropriate screening tools for children, less accessibility to the treatment facility, inadequate awareness, and reduced funding for TB have worsened the situation. All these have resulted in jeopardizing our dream to terminate this deadly condition. So, it is high time to focus on this issue to achieve our Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the goal of ending TB by 2030, as planned by WHO. This review explores childhood TB's current position and areas to improve. This review utilized electronic-based data searched through PubMed, Google Scholar, Google Search Engine, Science Direct, and Embase.

Cost-Effectiveness of All-Oral Regimens for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Korea: Comparison With Conventional Injectable-Containing Regimens.

Regimens for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) have been changed from injectable-containing regimens to all-oral regimens. The economic effectiveness of new all-oral regimens compared with conventional injectable-containing regimens was scarcely evaluated. This study was conducted to compare the cost-effectiveness between all-oral longer-course regimens (the oral regimen group) and conventional injectable-containing regimens (the control group) to treat newly diagnosed MDR-TB patients. A health economic analysis over lifetime horizon (20 years) from the perspective of the healthcare system in Korea was conducted. We developed a combined simulation model of a decision tree model (initial two years) and two Markov models (remaining 18 years, six-month cycle length) to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) between the two groups. The transition probabilities and cost in each cycle were assumed based on the published data and the analysis of health big data that combined country-level claims data and TB registry in 2013-2018. The oral regimen group was assumed to spend 20,778 USD more and lived 1.093 years or 1.056 quality-adjusted life year (QALY) longer than the control group. The ICER of the base case was calculated to be 19,007 USD/life year gained and 19,674 USD/QALY. The results of sensitivity analyses showed that base case results were very robust and stable, and the oral regimen was cost-effective with a 100% probability for a willingness to pay more than 21,250 USD/QALY. This study confirmed that the new all-oral longer regimens for the treatment of MDR-TB were cost-effective in replacing conventional injectable-containing regimens.

A 24-Week, All-Oral Regimen for Rifampin-Resistant Tuberculosis

BackgroundIn patients with rifampin-resistant tuberculosis, all-oral treatment regimens that are more effective, shorter, and have a more acceptable side-effect profile than current regimens are needed.MethodsWe conducted an open-label, phase 2–3, multicenter, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three 24-week, all-oral regimens for the treatment of rifampin-resistant tuberculosis. Patients in Belarus, South Africa, and Uzbekistan who were 15 years of age or older and had rifampin-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis were enrolled. In stage 2 of the trial, a 24-week regimen of bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, and moxifloxacin (BPaLM) was compared with a 9-to-20-month standard-care regimen. The primary outcome was an unfavorable status (a composite of death, treatment failure, treatment discontinuation, loss to follow-up, or recurrence of tuberculosis) at 72 weeks after randomization. The noninferiority margin was 12 percentage points.ResultsRecruitment was terminated early. Of 301 patients in stage 2 of the trial, 145, 128, and 90 patients were evaluable in the intention-to-treat, modified intention-to-treat, and per-protocol populations, respectively. In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, 11% of the patients in the BPaLM group and 48% of those in the standard-care group had a primary-outcome event (risk difference, −37 percentage points; 96.6% confidence interval [CI], −53 to −22). In the per-protocol analysis, 4% of the patients in the BPaLM group and 12% of those in the standard-care group had a primary-outcome event (risk difference, −9 percentage points; 96.6% CI, −22 to 4). In the as-treated population, the incidence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher or serious adverse events was lower in the BPaLM group than in the standard-care group (19% vs. 59%).ConclusionsIn patients with rifampin-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis, a 24-week, all-oral regimen was noninferior to the accepted standard-care treatment, and it had a better safety profile. (Funded by Médecins sans Frontières; TB-PRACTECAL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02589782.)

Economic evaluation of shortened, bedaquiline-containing treatment regimens for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (STREAM stage 2): a within-trial analysis of a randomised controlled trial

The STREAM stage 2 trial assessed two bedaquiline-containing regimens for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: a 9-month all-oral regimen and a 6-month regimen containing an injectable drug for the first 2 months. We did a within-trial economic evaluation of these regimens. STREAM stage 2 was an international, phase 3, non-inferiority randomised trial in which participants with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis were randomly assigned (1:2:2:2) to the 2011 WHO regimen (terminated early), a 9-month injectable-containing regimen (control regimen), a 9-month all-oral regimen with bedaquiline (oral regimen), or a 6-month regimen with bedaquiline and an injectable for the first 2 months (6-month regimen). We prospectively collected direct and indirect costs and health-related quality of life data from trial participants until week 76 of follow-up. Cost-effectiveness of the oral and 6-month regimens versus control was estimated in four countries (oral regimen) and two countries (6-month regimen), using health-related quality of life for cost-utility analysis and trial efficacy for cost-effectiveness analysis. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN18148631. 300 participants were included in the economic analyses (Ethiopia, 61; India, 142; Moldova, 51; Uganda, 46). In the cost-utility analysis, the oral regimen was not cost-effective in Ethiopia, India, Moldova, and Uganda from either a provider or societal perspective. In Moldova, the oral regimen was dominant from a societal perspective. In the cost-effectiveness analysis, the oral regimen was likely to be cost-effective from a provider perspective at willingness-to-pay thresholds per additional favourable outcome of more than US$4500 in Ethiopia, $1900 in India, $3950 in Moldova, and $7900 in Uganda, and from a societal perspective at thresholds of more than $15 900 in Ethiopia, $3150 in India, and $4350 in Uganda, while in Moldova the oral regimen was dominant. In Ethiopia and India, the 6-month regimen would cost tuberculosis programmes and participants less than the control regimen and was highly likely to be cost-effective in both cost-utility analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. Reducing the bedaquiline price from $1·81 to $1·00 per tablet made the oral regimen cost-effective in the provider-perspective cost-utility analysis in India and Moldova and dominate over the control regimen in the provider-perspective cost-effectiveness analysis in India. At current costs, the oral bedaquiline-containing regimen for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis is unlikely to be cost-effective in many low-income and middle-income countries. The 6-month regimen represents a cost-effective alternative if injectable use for 2 months is acceptable. USAID and Janssen Research & Development.

More treatment options for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: the role of economic evaluation in informing uptake

There have been substantial advances in treatment options for multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis. Just a few years ago, a typical patient faced months of painful injections, life-changing adverse effects, and a very small chance of cure. This year, WHO announced forthcoming updates to global guidelines including 6-month and 9-month all-oral regimens for treatment of multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis.1 In the context of these rapidly changing options for treating multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis and persisting high costs of newer drugs such as bedaquiline, countries are facing difficult decisions about when and how to incorporate new drug regimens into national guidelines, and the economic effects of new regimens will be a key consideration in their uptake.

2354. Implementation of BPaL in the United States: Experience using a novel all-oral treatment regimen for rifampin-resistant or treatment-intolerant TB disease

Abstract Background Tuberculosis (TB) remains a leading infectious cause of death and morbidity globally. Rifampin-resistance or intolerance requires prolonged treatment using less effective, more toxic regimens. Recent trials demonstrated that the all-oral six-month “BPaL” regimen, Bedaquiline, Pretomanid and Linezolid, is 90% effective. In these trials, linezolid-induced hematologic and neurologic toxicity was high using 1200mg daily, whereas lower exposure (dose or duration) reduced toxicity. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is used by U.S. TB experts to maintain a serum linezolid trough < 2ug/ml, which correlates with reduced toxicity. Since U.S. FDA approval in 2019, BPaL has been widely implemented for the treatment of rifampin-intolerant or resistant TB disease. Methods We evaluated a cohort of patients with TB treated from October, 2019 through April, 2022, describing patient demographics, BPaL treatment dosing, and adverse events. TDM was performed for clinical purposes using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry to measure serum levels at trough and 2 and 6h post-linezolid dose. Clinical providers adjusted linezolid dose and dosing interval targeting a trough < 2ug/ml and peak of 12–26ug/ml. Results Among 64 BPaL patients, ages were 15–83 years, 22 (34.3%) were female, 6 (9.3%) U.S.-born, 4 (6.3%) HIV-infected. 50 (78.1%) had only pulmonary disease, 6 extrapulmonary, and 8 had both; 61 (91.0%) were culture-confirmed. Most (n=62) started linezolid 600mg daily. Linezolid was adjusted for 39 (66.1%) of the 59 patients with TDM; 18 had a trough >2ug/ml, 30 had dosing interval increased to thrice-weekly, and 17 had a dose increase. 52 (81.3%) patients completed BPaL and 12 remain on therapy. One 81-year-old female with diabetes, hypothyroidism, and B12 deficiency discontinued linezolid at 12 weeks for worsened neuropathy (linezolid trough=1.13ug/ml). She completed 26 weeks of bedaquiline/pretomanid and her symptoms returned to baseline. Conclusion Use of BPaL with clinical and TDM monitoring has transformed treatment of rifampin-resistant or intolerant TB in the U.S. Patients previously sentenced to 18–24 months of treatment with 5–7 hard-to-tolerate medications and modest efficacy can now complete treatment in 6–9 months with little toxicity and exceptional cure rates. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Safety, effectiveness, and adherence of a short and all-oral treatment regimen for the treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in Niger: a study protocol of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial with stratified block randomisation

BackgroundRifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) treatment requires combination treatment, which frequently causes serious adverse events and globally results in not much more than 60% treatment success. In Niger, a high cure rate was obtained with a RR-TB treatment strategy based on a second-line injectable drug (SLID)-containing Short Treatment Regimen (STR), with linezolid replacing the SLID in patients with ototoxicity. Given the availability of novel anti-tuberculosis drugs, WHO recommends all-oral RR-TB treatment. Considering the high level of success with the Niger treatment strategy, it would only be justified to replace it in case robust evidence shows that the WHO all-oral bedaquiline/linezolid (BDQ/LZD)-containing STR (experimental arm) performs better than the Niger RR-TB treatment strategy, (control arm) in terms of safety, effectiveness and adherence.MethodsA pragmatic randomised clinical trial (RCT) using stratified block randomisation, conducted between April 2021 and March 2024, prospectively enrols participants diagnosed with RR-TB in one of the four RR-TB units of the nation. Depending of the month in which patients are diagnosed with RR-TB, patients with FQ-susceptible RR-TB are enrolled in either the experimental arm or control arm.DiscussionTo increase the feasibility of conducting a RCT, embedded in routine activities of all Niger’s RR-TB Units, we used a creative trial design. We randomised by monthly blocks, whereby the regimen used changes every month, using the month of RR-TB diagnosis as stratifying variable. This approach was deemed feasible for Niger's national tuberculosis programme, as it simplifies the work of the clinicians running the RR-TB units. Our creative design may serve as an example for other national programs. Findings will inform national and international RR-TB treatment guidelines, and will also strengthen the evidence-base on how to develop robust RR-TB treatment regimens.Trial registrationPan African Clinical Trial Register PACTR202203645724919. Registered on 15 March 2022.