All-oral Regimens Research Articles

Patient and provider costs of the new BPaL regimen for drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment in South Africa: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Drug-resistant (DR) tuberculosis (TB) is typically characterized by resistance to a single or combination of first- and/or second-line anti-TB agents and commonly includes rifampicin-resistant (RR)-TB, multidrug-resistant (MDR)-TB, pre-extensively drug-resistant (pre-XDR)-TB and XDR-TB. Historically, all variations of DR-TB required treatment with second-line drugs which are less effective and more toxic than first-line options, have a longer treatment duration and are more expensive to both patients and providers. The World Health Organization (WHO) now recommends a new second-line 3-drug 6-month all-oral regimen consisting of bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid referred to as BPaL. We estimate patient and provider costs of DR-TB treatment with BPaL compared to the current standard of care in South Africa. In coordination with South Africa's BPaL clinical access programme (CAP) we conducted an economic evaluation of A) patient costs through a cross-sectional patient cost survey and B) provider costs through a bottom-up costing analysis consisting of a retrospective medical record review (patient resource-use) and top-down financial record review (fixed/shared costs such as overhead). Across both costing perspectives, we compare costs of 1) BPaL, to current standard of care options including the 2) 9-11-month standard short oral regimen (SSOR) and 3) 18-21-month standard long oral regimen (SLOR). Eligible patients included those ≥14 years old with confirmed sputum pulmonary RR/MDR-TB, pre-XDR or XDR-TB. All costs are reported in 2022 United States Dollar (US$). A total of 72 patients were enrolled and completed the patient cost survey (41.7% on BPaL, 16.7% on the SSOR and 41.7% on the SLOR). Mean on-treatment patient costs were lowest among those on BPaL ($56.6) and increased four-fold among those on the SSOR ($228.1) and SLOR ($224.7). Direct medical patient costs were negligible across all treatment regimens, while direct non-medical patient and guardian costs for travel, food and nutritional supplementation accounted for the largest proportion of total costs ($54.6, $227.8 and $224.3 for BPaL, the SSOR and SLOR respectively). In assessing provider costs, a total of 112 medical records were reviewed (37.5%, 41.1% and 21.4% on BPaL, the SSOR and SLOR respectively). Total provider costs for producing a favorable treatment outcome (cured/completed treatment) were similar among those on BPaL ($4,948.7 per patient) and the SSOR ($4,905.6 per patient) with costs increasing substantially among those on the SLOR ($8,919.9 per patient). Based on incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), at even the lowest willingness to pay (WTP) threshold, treatment with the new BPaL regimen was more cost-effective than current standard of care treatment options (ICER: $311.4 < WTP: $3,341). When using the newly recommended BPaL regimen, cost to patients decreased by 75% compared to current standard of care treatment options in South Africa. Due in part to higher resource-use within the BPaL CAP offsetting the shorter treatment duration, cost of treatment provision through BPaL and the 9-11-month SSOR were similar. However, when considering cost and treatment outcomes, BPaL was more cost-effective than other standard of care regimens currently available for DR-TB in South Africa.

A non-randomized pragmatic historically controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness and safety of a bedaquiline or a linezolid-based short regimen for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis

Short all-oral regimens for Rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (ShORRT) have been a turning point in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Despite this, access to drugs, stockouts, or adverse effects may limit the use of the recommended regimens. Pragmatic non-randomized trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of a ShORRT strategy for the treatment of rifampicin-resistant Tuberculosis (RR-TB) at the Hospital Nossa Senhora da Paz (Angola). The strategy assigned participants to receive a bedaquiline (BDQ) or a linezolid-based (LZF) regimen supplemented with levofloxacin, clofazimine, and cycloserine for up to 9 months. One hundred and twenty-one participants with pulmonary RR-TB were treated with the ShORRT strategy; 69 received the bedaquiline- and 52 the linezolid-based regimen. Overall, 98 (81%) participants had successful treatment outcomes, which was significantly higher compared to a 20-month historical injectable-based regimen (successful outcome rate including cure and treatment completed: 53.7%) (p<0.001). No significant differences between treatment success rates (85.5% vs. 75.0%), treatment failure (0.0% vs. 1.9%), death (5.8% vs. 13.5%), or lost to follow-up (LTFU) (8.7% vs. 9.6%) were seen between the BDQ and the LZF-based regimen. Globally, 72 adverse events (AE) occurred in 36 (29.7%) participants. Eighteen (14.9%) of these were grade ≥3 and were more frequently observed in those receiving the LZD-based regimen (p=0.02). The ShORRT strategy with a nine-month BDQ- or LZD-based regimen supports the efficacy of shorter all-oral regimens for the treatment of RR-TB and presents real-world data from schemes without bedaquiline, nitroimidazole, or injectables.

Long-term efficacy and safety of two short standardised regimens for the treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (STREAM stage 2): extended follow-up of an open-label, multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial

STREAM stage 2 showed that two bedaquiline-containing regimens (a 9-month all-oral regimen and a 6-month regimen with 8 weeks of aminoglycoside) had superior efficacy to a 9-month injectable-containing regimen for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis up to 76 weeks after randomisation. Our objective in this follow-up analysis was to assess the durability of efficacy and safety, including mortality, at 132 weeks. We report the long-term outcomes from STREAM stage 2, a randomised, phase 3 non-inferiority (10% margin) trial in participants (aged ≥15 years) with rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis without fluoroquinolone or aminoglycoside resistance at 13 clinical sites in seven countries (Ethiopia, Georgia, India, Moldova, Mongolia, South Africa, and Uganda). Participants were randomly assigned 1:2:2:2 (via permuted blocks and stratified by site and HIV status plus CD4 cell count) to the 2011 WHO long regimen (terminated early), a 9-month control regimen, a 9-month oral regimen with bedaquiline (primary comparison), or a 6-month regimen with bedaquiline and 8 weeks of an injectable antituberculous drug. Participants and clinicians were aware of treatment-group assignments, but laboratory staff were masked. The primary outcome, reported previously, was favourable status (negative cultures for Mycobacterium tuberculosis without a preceding unfavourable outcome; any death, bacteriological failure or recurrence, and major treatment change were considered unfavourable) at week 76. Here we report efficacy outcomes at week 132, analysed in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population. Safety assessments continued to 132 weeks and were in all participants who received at least one dose of the study regimen. All comparisons used concurrently randomised participants. This trial is registered on ISRCTN (ISRCTN18148631) and is now completed. Between March 28, 2016, and Jan 28, 2020, 588 participants were randomly assigned to the long (n=32), control (n=202), oral (n=211), or 6-month (n=143) treatment regimens; 352 (60%) were male and 236 (40%) were female. Of the 556 participants on the three shorter regimens, 517 were included in the mITT population (187 in control group, 196 in oral group, and 134 in 6-month group) and 465 in the per-protocol analyses. Six additional participants had an unfavourable outcome that occurred between week 76 and the end of efficacy follow-up (one in control group, four in oral group, one in 6-month group). In the mITT population, the proportion of patients with an unfavourable outcome at the end of follow-up was 19·6% (95% CI 14·3 to 24·9) in the oral group and 29·3% (23·3 to 36·5) in the control group (-9·7 percentage points difference [95% CI -18·7 to -1·8]; psuperiority=0·024). An estimated 9·8% (95% CI 4·6 to 14·9) of participants on the 6-month regimen had an unfavourable outcome, which was significantly lower than for those concurrently on the control regimen (32·5% [23·7 to 40·2]; psuperiority<0·0001) or the oral regimen (23·8% [16·9 to 31·1]; psuperiority=0·013). Few serious or severe adverse events were reported after week 76, with no indication of a difference between the regimens. At week 132, treatment-emergent hearing loss was recorded in significantly fewer participants on the oral regimen (7/205; 3%) than the control regimen (16/198; 8%; p=0.041); there was no significant difference in severe hearing loss between the oral regimen (6/139; 4%) and the 6-month regimen (5/143; 4%; p=0·72). Death rates were low: 1·01 (95% CI 0·48 to 2·12) per 100 person-years in participants allocated to bedaquiline (ie, oral and 6-month regimen, n=287) compared with 1·52 (0·63 to 3·66) in participants on the control regimen (n=140; p=0·49). Both of the bedaquiline-containing regimens maintained superiority to the control regimen, without evidence of increased mortality, providing two additional evidence-based treatment options for patients; previous mortality concerns for bedaquiline were not substantiated. US Agency for International Development and Janssen Research & Development.

Effect of Different Levofloxacin Doses on QTc Interval Prolongation in Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Patients Treated with the 9-Month All-Oral Regimen

Introduction: The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended the 9-month all-oral regimen for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) treatment. This regimen is expected to increase the treatment success rate. Bedaquiline, levofloxacin, and clofazimine are QT-prolonging drugs included in the 9-month all-oral regimen. Bedaquiline and clofazimine are given at the same dose for all patients, while levofloxacine dose is given in 750 mg and 1,000 mg based on the body weight. This study analyzed the correlation between different levofloxacin doses and certain factors on QTc interval prolongation. Methods: This observational retrospective study used the medical records of MDR-TB patients who underwent the 9-month all-oral regimen. Electrocardiography (ECG) for QTc interval measurement was recorded at the baseline before and 2 weeks after treatment. The measured variables included patient demographic data, body mass index (BMI), electrolyte levels, and comorbidities. Results: Thirty MDR-TB patients were included in this study. Gender, diabetes mellitus (DM), and levofloxacin dose did not correlate with QTc interval prolongation at 2 weeks after drug administration (p-values of 0.558, 0.197, and 0.134, respectively). Age, potassium level, magnesium level, calcium level, and baseline QTc interval also did not correlate with QTc interval prolongation at 2 weeks after drug administration (p-values of 0.433, 0.479, 0.705, 0.746, and 0.333, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that the risk factor associated with QTc interval prolongation at 2 weeks after drug administration was a BMI of 0.013. Conclusion: Different levofloxacin doses did not correlate with QTc interval prolongation in MDR-TB patients treated with the 9-month all-oral regimen. The incidence of QTc interval prolongation was significantly associated with the lower BMI level.

Nine months of bedaquiline, linezolid, levofloxacin, clofazimine, and cycloserine chemotherapy for rifampicin/multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a multicenter, randomized, open-label non-inferiority trial in China

BackgroundWe concurrently developed a prospective study to assess clinical outcomes among patients receiving 9-month bedaquiline (BDQ)-containing regimens, aiming to provide valuable data on the use of this short-course regimen in China.MethodsThis open-label, randomized, controlled, multicenter, non-inferiority trial was conducted at sixteen hospitals, and enrolled participants aged 18 years and older with pulmonary rifampicin/multidrug tuberculosis. Participants were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio. Individuals within the standard-regimen group received 6 months of BDQ, linezolid, levofloxacin, clofazimine, and cycloserine plus 12 months of levofloxacin, and any three potentially effective drugs from clofazimine, cycloserine pyrazinamide, ethambutol and protionamide, whereas individuals within shorter-regimen group received 9 months of BDQ, linezolid, levofloxacin, clofazimine and cycloserine. The primary outcome was the percentage of participants with a composite unfavorable outcome (treatment failure, death, treatment discontinuation, or loss to follow-up) by the end of the treatment course after randomization in the modified intention-to-treat population. The noninferiority margin was 10%. This trial was registered with www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2000029012.ResultsBetween Jan 1, 2020, and Dec 31, 2023, 264 were screened and randomly assigned, 132 of 264 participants were assigned to the standard-regimen group and 132 were assigned to the shorter-regimen. Thirty-three (12.55%) of 264 participants were excluded from the modified intention-to-treat analysis. As a result, 231 participants were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (116 in the standard-regimen group and 115 in the shorter-regimen group).In the modified intention-to-treat population, unfavorable outcomes were reported in 19 (16.5%) of 115 participants for whom the outcome was assessable in the shorter-regimen group and 26 (22.4%) of 116 participants in the standard care group (risk difference 5.9 percentage points (97.5% CI − 5.8 to 17.5)). One death was reported in the standard-regimen group. The incidence of QTcF prolongation in the shorter-regimen group (22.6%, 26/115) was similar to the standard-regimen group (24.1%, 28/116).ConclusionsThe 9-month, all-oral regimen is safe and efficacious for the treatment of pulmonary rifampicin/multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. The high incidence of QTc prolongation associated with the use of BDQ highlights the urgent need of routine electrocardiogram monitoring under treatment with BDQ-containing regimens in the Chinese population.

Progress in programmatic management of drug-resistant TB, WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region, 2018-2023

&lt;sec&gt;&lt;title&gt;BACKGROUND&lt;/title&gt;Since 2012, WHO has supported countries in scaling up programmatic management of drug-resistant tuberculosis (PMDT). We assessed progress and challenges to formulate recommendations for improvement.&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;sec&gt;&lt;title&gt;METHODS&lt;/title&gt;We reviewed the regional Green Light Committee (rGLC)mission reports and analysed data to describe the progression of programme indicators.&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;sec&gt;&lt;title&gt;RESULTS&lt;/title&gt;The proportion of TB patients initially tested using Xpert MTB/RIF rose from 5% in 2017 to 54% in 2022. Testing for rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB) increased from 4% in 2015 to 68% in 2022 among new patients and from 17% in 2015 to 94% in 2022 among those previously treated. Consequently, in 2021–2022, the number of multidrug-resistant (MDR)/RR-TB patients diagnosed increased by 29% and 84% of them were treated, accounting for 22% of estimated cases. By 2023, fourteen countries had implemented all-oral regimens, with three initiating the 6-month bedaquiline, pretomanid, linezolid, and moxifloxacin regimen (BPaL(M)). MDR/RR-TB treatment success increased from 64% in 2017 to 73% in 2020.&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;sec&gt;&lt;title&gt;CONCLUSIONS&lt;/title&gt;Eastern Mediterranean Region countries progressed in PMDT using Xpert MTB/RIF, increased diagnosis and treatment of MDR/RR-TB patients using all-oral regimens, and improved treatment success. They must now enhance diagnostic capacity using WHO-recommended diagnostics, decentralise services while integrating them into primary health care, and prioritise the BPaL(M) regimen.&lt;/sec&gt;

Second-line drug-resistant TB and associated risk factors in Karakalpakstan, Uzbekistan

&lt;sec&gt;&lt;title&gt;BACKGROUND&lt;/title&gt;Drug-resistant TB (DR-TB) remains a major public health threat. In 2022, Uzbekistan reported 2,117 cases of DR-TB, with 69% tested for fluoroquinolone resistance. Limited information is available on the prevalence of resistance to bedaquiline, linezolid, and fluoroquinolone, which are key components of the all-oral treatment regimen for rifampicin-resistant TB in Uzbekistan.&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;sec&gt;&lt;title&gt;METHODS&lt;/title&gt;A retrospective study was conducted using extensive programmatic data from 2019 to 2023 in Uzbekistan. We assessed second-line drug-resistant TB (SLDR-TB) rates using phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST). Demographic and clinical characteristics associated with SLDR-TB were analysed using multivariable logistic regression models based on the Allen-Cady approach.&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;sec&gt;&lt;title&gt;RESULTS&lt;/title&gt;In total, 2,405 patients with TB who had undergone pDST were included (median age 40 years, 47% female). The overall SLDR-TB resistance rate was 24% (95% CI 22–26). Prevalence of resistance to bedaquiline, linezolid, moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, and amikacin were respectively 3.1%, 0.8%, 15%, 13%, and 12%. Risk factors for SLDR-TB were resistance to rifampicin and/or isoniazid, exposure to clofazimine, retreatment status, contact with drug-susceptible TB case or DR-TB case, and diabetes.&lt;/sec&gt;&lt;sec&gt;&lt;title&gt;CONCLUSIONS&lt;/title&gt;The high prevalence of SLDR-TB is of major concern, emphasising the need for baseline pDST in RR-TB treatment. Identified risk factors can aid early detection of at-risk individuals and inform clinical practice.&lt;/sec&gt;

Clinical application of whole-genome sequencing in the management of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: a case report

BackgroundWhole-genome sequencing (WGS)-based prediction of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis has the potential to guide clinical decisions in the design of optimal treatment regimens.MethodsWe utilized WGS to investigate drug resistance mutations in a 32-year-old Tanzanian male admitted to Kibong’oto Infectious Diseases Hospital with a history of interrupted multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment for more than three years. Before admission, he received various all-oral bedaquiline-based multidrug-resistant tuberculosis treatment regimens with unfavourable outcomes.ResultsDrug susceptibility testing of serial M. tuberculosis isolates using Mycobacterium Growth Incubator Tubes culture and WGS revealed resistance to first-line anti-TB drugs, bedaquiline, and fluoroquinolones but susceptibility to linezolid, clofazimine, and delamanid. WGS of serial cultured isolates revealed that the Beijing (Lineage 2.2.2) strain was resistant to bedaquiline, with mutations in the mmpR5 gene (Rv0678. This study also revealed the emergence of two distinct subpopulations of bedaquiline-resistant tuberculosis strains with Asp47f and Glu49fs frameshift mutations in the mmpR5 gene, which might be the underlying cause of prolonged resistance. An individualized regimen comprising bedaquiline, delamanid, pyrazinamide, ethionamide, and para-aminosalicylic acid was designed. The patient was discharged home at month 8 and is currently in the ninth month of treatment. He reported no cough, chest pain, fever, or chest tightness but still experienced numbness in his lower limbs.ConclusionWe propose the incorporation of WGS in the diagnostic framework for the optimal management of patients with drug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis.

Effectiveness of bedaquiline containing all oral longer regimens in treating multidrug/rifampicin resistant tuberculosis in Pakistan

BackgroundDespite the introduction of bedaquiline (Bdq) containing all-oral regimens for treating patients with rifampicin resistant/multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) in 2019, data on its effectiveness in Pakistan, which has the fifth highest MDR-TB burden, is lacking. This study evaluates treatment outcomes and identifies factors associated with unsuccessful outcomes among MDR/RR-TB patients treated with an all-oral longer treatment regimen (LTR). MethodsThis retrospective record review included all microbiologically confirmed pulmonary MDR/RR-TB patients treated with an all-oral LTR between August 2019 and February 2021 across nine PMDT centres in Pakistan. Sociodemographic and clinical data were retrieved from the Electronic Nominal Recording and Reporting System. Treatment outcomes, defined by WHO criteria, were analysed using SPSS and multivariate binary logistic regression to identify factors associated with unsuccessful outcomes. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. ResultsThe final analysis included 644 MDR/RR-TB patients (mean age 37.9 ± 17.6 years), mostly male (53.0 %), underweight (68.0 %), with TB treatment history (66.1 %), MDR-TB (84.9 %), lung cavitation (71.0 %), and no comorbidities (86.4 %). Fluoroquinolone resistance was found in 41.9 %, 16 % had used second-line drugs, and 9.8 % had previous MDR-TB treatment. A total of 400 (62.1 %) patients were declared cured, 53 (8.2 %) treatment completed, 117 (18.2 %) died, 37 (5.7 %) lost to follow-up (LTFU), and 37 (5.7 %) treatment failures. Overall treatment success rate was 70.3 % (n = 453). In multivariate analysis, history of TB treatment (OR:1.63, 95 %CI:1.09–2.64, p = 0.023), previous SLD use (OR:2.09, 95 %CI: 1.20–3.37, p = 0.012), resistance to Z (OR:0.43, 95 %CI: 0.20–0.81, p = 0.023), and resistance to > 5 drugs (OR:3.12, 95 %CI:1.36–11.64, p = 0.013) were significantly associated with death and treatment failure. Whereas, lung cavitation had statistically significant association with LTFU (OR:2.66, 95 %CI:1.10–7.32, p = 0.045). ConclusionTreatment success rate (70.3 %) in this study fell below the WHO recommended target success rate (>90 %). Enhanced clinical management, coupled with special attention to patients exhibiting identified risk factors could improve treatment outcomes.

Safety of high-dose amikacin in the first week of all-oral rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis treatment for the prevention of acquired resistance (STAKE): protocol for a single-arm clinical trial

IntroductionAn effective rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) treatment regimen should include prevention of resistance amplification. While bedaquiline (BDQ) has been recommended in all-oral RR-TB treatment regimen since 2019, resistance is rising at...

Efficacies of omadacycline + amikacin + imipenem and an all-oral regimen omadacycline + clofazimine + linezolid in a mouse model of M. abscessus lung disease.

Treatment outcomes for Mycobacteroides abscessus (Mab, also known as Mycobacterium abscessus) disease are still unsatisfactory, mainly due to issues with drug toxicity, tolerability, and efficacy. Treating Mab disease is challenging due to its high baseline antibiotic resistance, initial requirement for intravenous therapy, and poor medication tolerance. Omadacycline, a new tetracycline, is active against Mab. Since any new antibiotic effective against Mab is expected to be used in combination with other antibiotics, we evaluated the efficacy of two triple-drug combinations comprising omadacycline, omadacycline + amikacin + imipenem, and omadacycline + clofazimine + linezolid against two contemporary Mab clinical isolates in a mouse model of Mab lung disease. Antibiotic administration was initiated 1-week post-infection and was given daily, with Mab burden in the lungs at treatment completion serving as the endpoint. Omadacycline alone moderately reduced Mab levels and maintained better health in mice compared to untreated ones, which typically suffered from the infection. The omadacycline + clofazimine + linezolid combination showed immediate bactericidal activity and enhanced efficacy over 6 weeks, particularly against the more resistant strain (M9507). However, the clofazimine + linezolid combination lacked early bactericidal activity. When combined with amikacin and imipenem, omadacycline did not improve the regimen's effectiveness over 4 weeks of treatment. Our study showed that omadacycline + clofazimine + linezolid exhibited significant bactericidal activity over an extended treatment duration. However, adding omadacycline to amikacin and imipenem did not improve regimen effectiveness against the evaluated clinical isolates within 4 weeks. Further research in Mab disease patients is needed to determine the most effective omadacycline-containing regimen.IMPORTANCEMycobacteroides abscessus is a common environmental bacterium that causes infections in people with compromised lung function, including those with bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and weakened immune systems, especially among older individuals. Treating M. abscessus disease is challenging due to the limited effectiveness and toxicity of current antibiotics, which often require prolonged use. Omadacycline, a new antibiotic, shows promise against M. abscessus. Using a mouse model that mimics M. abscessus disease in humans, we studied the effectiveness of including omadacycline with recommended antibiotics. Adding omadacycline to clofazimine and linezolid significantly improved treatment outcomes, rapidly clearing the bacteria from the lungs and maintaining effectiveness throughout. This oral combination is convenient for patients. However, adding omadacycline to amikacin and imipenem did not improve treatment effectiveness within 4 weeks. Further study with M. abscessus patients is necessary to optimize omadacycline-based treatment strategies for this disease.

Bedaquiline/Linezolid-containing all-oral Regimen is Less Safe with Similar Efficacy Compared to the Niger Approach for Rifampicin-resistant Tuberculosis

Bedaquiline/Linezolid-containing all-oral Regimen is Less Safe with Similar Efficacy Compared to the Niger Approach for Rifampicin-resistant Tuberculosis

Improving Treatment Literacy of Antibiotic Use in Newly Defined WHO 6 Months and 9 Months All-oral Regimens for Drug-resistant Tuberculosis – Comparison of the Readability of Patient Information Leaflets from High Tuberculosis Burden Countries to 10 Antibiotics Used in the Treatment of Drug-resistant Tuberculosis

Improving Treatment Literacy of Antibiotic Use in Newly Defined WHO 6 Months and 9 Months All-oral Regimens for Drug-resistant Tuberculosis – Comparison of the Readability of Patient Information Leaflets from High Tuberculosis Burden Countries to 10 Antibiotics Used in the Treatment of Drug-resistant Tuberculosis

Safety and effectiveness of three novel all-oral shortened regimens for rifampicin- or multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Kazakhstan.

In 2019, WHO called for operational research on all-oral shortened regimens for multidrug- and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB). We report safety and effectiveness of three nine-month all-oral regimens containing bedaquiline (Bdq), linezolid (Lzd), and levofloxacin (Lfx) and reinforced with cycloserine (Cs) and clofazimine (Cfz), delamanid (Dlm) and pyrazinamide (Z), or Dlm and Cfz. We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients initiating treatment for pulmonary MDR/RR-TB under operational research conditions at public health facilities in Kazakhstan. Participants were screened monthly for adverse events. Participants with baseline resistance were excluded from the study and treated with a longer regimen. We analyzed clinically relevant adverse events of special interest in all participants and sputum culture conversion and end-of-treatment outcomes among individuals who were not excluded. Of 510 participants, 41% were women, median age was 37 years (interquartile range: 28-49), 18% had a body mass index <18·5 kg/m2, and 51% had cavitary disease. Three hundred and ninety-nine (78%) initiated Bdq-Lzd-Lfx-Cs-Cfz, 83 (16%) started Bdq-Lzd-Lfx-Dlm-Z, and 28 (5%) initiated Bdq-Lzd-Lfx-Dlm-Cfz. Fifty-eight individuals (11%) were excluded from the study, most commonly due to identification of baseline drug resistance (n = 52; 90%). Among the remaining 452 participants, treatment success frequencies were 92% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 89 to 95), 89% (95%CI: 80 to 94), and 100% (95%CI: 86 to 100) for regimens with Cs/Cfz, Dlm/Z, and Dlm/Cfz respectively. Clinically-relevant adverse events of special interest were uncommon. All regimens demonstrated excellent safety and effectiveness, expanding the potential treatment options for patients, providers, and programs.

Repurposing ibrutinib for chemo-immunotherapy in a phase 1b study of ibrutinib with indoximod plus metronomic cyclophosphamide and etoposide for patients with childhood brain cancer.

TPS2703 Background: In children, brain cancer is the leading cause of cancer related death. The indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) pathway is a metabolic checkpoint, expressed by host myeloid and dendritic cells, that suppresses anti-tumor immune responses following chemotherapy. We recently published results of a first-in-children phase 1 trial (NCT02502708) that showed the oral IDO-pathway inhibitor indoximod was well tolerated and provided meaningful clinical benefit for many patients with progressive childhood brain tumors, when given in combination with oral chemotherapy regimens (1). Using preclinical models, we have also reported the importance of the Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) pathway as a key upstream driver of IDO during chemotherapy (2). Thus, we hypothesize that adding the BTK-inhibitor ibrutinib to the previously studied regimen of investigational indoximod IDO-inhibitor plus oral metronomic cyclophosphamide and etoposide will synergistically enhance anti-tumor immune responses, leading to improvement in Objective Response Rate (ORR) with manageable overlapping toxicity. Methods: The current study (NCT05106296) is an Investigator-Sponsored, open label, single-arm phase 1b trial comprised of a Dose-escalation Cohort (n=18) using a 3+3 dose escalation design to establish safety and dosing of ibrutinib in the combined regimen; followed by an Expansion Cohort (n=19) at the MTD to evaluate efficacy. Patients are treated with the all-oral 4-drug chemo-immunotherapy regimen in 28-day cycles using: (i) ibrutinib [Study Dose once daily on days 1-21]; (ii) indoximod [38.4 mg/kg/day divided twice daily throughout the cycle]; (iii) cyclophosphamide [2.5 mg/kg/dose, maximum dose 100 mg, once daily on days 1-21]; and (iv) etoposide [50 mg/m2/dose once daily on days 1-21]. Eligible patients are age 12 to 25 years with relapsed or refractory brain cancer, MRI evidence of current active disease not recently treated with radiation/proton therapy, ECOG performance score 0-2, and meet standard organ function requirements. Patients with systemic infection, autoimmune disease, recent live-virus vaccination, comorbid conditions that may overlap with expected regimen toxicities, or chronic treatment with anticoagulants or strong CYP3A inhibitors are excluded. Primary Objectives are to: (i) determine the pediatric recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of ibrutinib for the combined regimen (Dose-escalation Cohort), and (ii) evaluate preliminary evidence of efficacy for the combined regimen in terms of ORR (Expansion Cohort). Exploratory analyses use single-cell RNA and TCR sequencing (scRNAseq/TCRseq) of cryopreserved serial peripheral blood samples to monitor for treatment-expanded TCR clonotypes and study their phenotype. 1. Neuro-Oncology 26:348-361, 2024. 2. Immunity54:2354-2371, 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT05106296 .

Outcomes in high-risk subgroups after fixed-duration ibrutinib + venetoclax for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL): Up to 5.5 years of follow-up in the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study.

7009 Background: The phase 2 CAPTIVATE study evaluated first-line ibrutinib (Ibr) + venetoclax (Ven) for CLL/SLL in 2 cohorts: minimal residual disease (MRD)-guided randomized discontinuation (MRD cohort) and Fixed Duration (FD cohort). Ibr±Ven retreatment was allowed in patients (pts) who had progressive disease (PD). Here, we report outcomes for pts with high-risk genomic features from the FD cohort and retreatment outcomes in pts from the FD cohort and MRD cohort placebo arm. Methods: Pts aged ≤70 y with previously untreated CLL/SLL without restriction on genomic risk factors received 3 cycles of Ibr, then 12 cycles of Ibr+Ven (Ibr, 420 mg/d orally; Ven, 5-wk ramp up to 400 mg/d orally). On-study retreatment included single-agent Ibr (FD cohort or MRD cohort placebo arm); pts with PD &gt;2 y after end of treatment (EOT) could be retreated with FD Ibr+Ven (FD cohort). Results: In the FD cohort (n=159) with a median follow-up of 61.2 mo (range, 0.8–66.3), 5-y PFS and OS rates (95% CI) were 67% (59–74) and 96% (91–98), respectively. 5-y PFS rates were higher in pts with undetectable MRD at 3 mo after EOT in peripheral blood (83%) or bone marrow (84%) vs those without (48% and 50%, respectively). 5-y PFS rates (95% CI) in pts with genomic risk factors were: del(17p)/mutated TP53 41% (21–59), complex karyotype 57% (37–72), del(11q) 64% (30–85), and unmutated IGHV 68% (50–80) (Table). In total, 18 second malignancies occurred in 13 pts (10 events in 8 pts during FD Ibr+Ven, 6 events in 4 pts after EOT and before retreatment, and 2 events in 2 pts during retreatment). Of 202 pts who completed Ibr+Ven (FD cohort, n=159; MRD cohort placebo arm, n=43), 63 have had PD to date; PD occurred &gt;2 y after EOT in 43/63 pts (68%). 32/63 (51%) pts initiated retreatment with Ibr (n=25) or Ibr+Ven (n=7). With a median time on Ibr retreatment of 21.9 mo (range, 0.03–50.4), ORR was 86% in 22 evaluable pts (best response: 1 CR; 1 nodular PR; 17 PR; 2 SD; 1 PD [Richter transformation]). With a median time on Ibr+Ven retreatment of 13.8 mo (range, 3.7–15.1), ORR was 71% in 7 evaluable pts (best response: 1 CR; 4 PR; 1 PR with lymphocytosis; 1 SD). Conclusions: With up to 5.5 y of follow-up, FD Ibr+Ven continues to provide clinically meaningful PFS in pts with high-risk genomic features, as well as in the overall population. Ibr-based retreatment provides promising responses in pts needing subsequent therapy after the all-oral FD regimen of Ibr+Ven. Clinical trial information: NCT02910583 . [Table: see text]

Assessing the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of all oral adjuvant chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, capecitabine) in high-risk hormone receptor positive breast cancer.

TPS616 Background: Women with high-risk HR+/HER2- breast cancer (BCA) receive additional chemotherapy to reduce disease recurrence. Preferred Taxane and Anthracycline based chemotherapy regimens have debilitating side effects such as cardiotoxicity, leukemia, peripheral neuropathy, severe fatigue, alopecia, downtime which are more common in black women thereby necessitating dose reductions. Metronomic cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluourouracil (CMF) is an option but less preferred due to frequent dosing and longer therapy duration. Head-to-head comparison of CMF to anthracycline-based chemotherapy conducted 3 decades ago in early-stage BCA showed anthracycline benefit was driven by HER2+ disease with no benefit for HR+/HER2- BCA. Head-to-head comparison trials of CMF and Taxane-based regimen have not been conducted but single institution data suggest similar disease-free and similar overall survival but different toxicity profiles favoring CMF. In our ongoing trial, we converted all three chemotherapy drugs in CMF regimen to an all-oral regimen namely oral Cyclophosphamide, oral Methotrexate, oral Capecitabine (CMC) with the potential benefit of increased patient convenience, decreased costs (oral agents are generic; no chair time; no growth factors), and improved toxicity profile (low rates of grade III neutropenia, no port complications, no alopecia). This trial in progress aims to evaluate the feasibility of oral CMC by measuring the relative dose intensity in addition to the safety and tolerability of oral CMC. We hypothesize that 80% of patients will receive &gt;85% of the intended dose of oral CMC. Methods: This is a Phase II, single arm, non-randomized study enrolling 25 patients with high-risk early-stage HR+ HER2- breast cancer to receive oral CMC regimen based on dose conversion equivalent bioavailability with conventional metronomic CMF chemotherapy. Enrolled patients will receive adjuvant therapy of oral cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m2 PO days 1-21 continuously, Methotrexate 15 mg/m2 PO Day 1, 8, and 15 and Capecitabine 650 mg/m2 PO BID Day 1- 14 to be given every 21 days for 8 cycles. The primary objective is to assess feasibility which is defined as 80% of patients (greater than 20 patients) maintaining a relative dose intensity (RDI) &gt; 85%. The RDI is calculated as the ratio of the actual dose intensity/standard dose intensity; the average RDI for oral CMC regimen is the sum of RDI for each drug divided by 3. This study will be stopped if &gt;25% of patients report Grade 4+ toxicity on oral CMC. The secondary objectives will assess quality of life as reported by the patients and report adverse effects. Clinical trial information: NCT06085742 . [Table: see text]

Twice-weekly induction with ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) combination followed by extended IRd consolidation and lenalidomide maintenance in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: Results of the phase 2 study IFM2014-03.

Therapeutic strategies for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) have considerably improved during the last 10 years. The IFM2014-03 trial proposed an all-oral triplet induction/consolidation regimen in transplant-eligible NDMM patients, followed by lenalidomide maintenance. Induction consisted of three 21-day cycles of ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRd), before high-dose Melphalan with transplant followed by eight 28-day cycles of IRd consolidation before 13 cycles of lenalidomide maintenance. Forty-six patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of therapy, and 39 entered the maintenance phase. The primary end-point was stringent complete response after consolidation, and was achieved in nine patients (20.9%, 90% CI 11.4-33.7; p = 0.998). Ten patients (24.4%) had an undetectable minimal residual disease. The overall response rate was 95.7%. The 3-year progression-free survival was 66.3%. No unexpected toxicities were recorded, and only eight patients suspended from any study drug. Of note, 21 (45.7%) patients reported peripheral neuropathy (PN) (grades 1-2 with no serious adverse events). IRd induction and consolidation with transplant before lenalidomide maintenance shows lower response rates compared to other triplet therapies. It could be an alternative for patients who require an all-oral regimen and/or with pre-existent PN, especially if quadruplet regimens including anti-CD38 antibody are not available.

All-Oral Regimen Highly Effective in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia

All-Oral Regimen Highly Effective in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia

The safety of modified, all-oral shorter tuberculosis regimens in Armenia.

The implementation of modified, all-oral shorter regimens for treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis has started in Armenia since August 2020 under the conditions of operational research. This study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of shorter regimens. We evaluated cumulative incidence rates of serious adverse events, adverse events of grade 3 and greater and events resulting in treatment modifications or suspension for 52 study participants. A new, different pattern of adverse events emerged compared with the previous evaluations of drug safety of treatment for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis. Arthralgia (23.1%) and peripheral neuropathy (21.2%) took leading positions among the adverse events resulting in modifications of treatment. Some adverse events of interest (prolonged QT interval, elevated liver enzymes and anemia) remained relevant for the patients receiving new combinations of anti-TB drugs. The other adverse events (impaired hearing, acute kidney injury and hypokalemia) lost their significance for safety surveillance of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis treatment. One unexpected serious adverse event (lymphoproliferative skin lesion) brought to a "failed treatment" outcome. The other serious adverse event was anemia. The shorter regimens proved to be safe and effective for treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis, but proper follow-up of adverse events is necessary.