All-inside Suture Research Articles

Outcomes of Arthroscopic All-Inside Meniscal Root Repair vs. Observation in Older Patients

Meniscal root tears occur in a bimodal distribution, affecting both young healthy athletes and older patients with early degenerative knees. Root tears lead to de-tensioning of the meniscus and have been associated with increased contact forces and cartilage damage. Management of older patients with root tears is controversial and the efficacy of different treatment options is unclear. The primary aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing an all-inside arthroscopic repair technique versus non-operative management for posterior meniscal root tears. 48 patients diagnosed with a posterior meniscal root tear between 2006 and 2015 were identified and divided into 2 groups: the arthroscopic repair group (AR, 30 knees) and the observation group (O: 18 knees). The AR group underwent a meniscal root repair technique where two all-inside sutures were used to reduce the root back to its remnant (reduction sutures) thereby re-tensioning the meniscus. One mattress suture was then added to strengthen the repair by re-approximating the construct to the posterior capsule. KOOS subscores (Symptoms, Pain, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Sports and Rec, Quality of Life), Lysholm, Tegner, and VR12 PCS questionnaires were used as the primary outcome measures at a minimum 2 years follow-up. Differences in baseline patient characteristics between the surgical and non-surgical group were examined using Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables. For changes from baseline to follow up between the surgical and non-surgical group, independent sample t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted depending on normality. A Fisher’s exact test was also utilized to analyze the rates of conversation to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between the surgical and non-surgical group. There were significant changes in all baseline to follow up mean KOOS (all subscores: p < 0.001), Lysholm (p < 0.001), Tegner (p = 0.0002), and VR12 PCS (p < 0.001) scores for the AR group, while the O group had a significant difference in only mean KOOS pain (p = 0.003), KOOS ADL (p = 0.006), and VR12 PCS (p = 0.038) scores from baseline to follow-up. The AR group had a significantly larger increase from baseline to follow up in mean KOOS pain scores (32.0) compared to the O group (15.7) (p = 0.009), KOOS symptom scores (AR: 24.2, O: 9.3, p = 0.029) as well as in Lysholm scores (AR: 27.3 and O: 7.1; p = 0.016). During the follow-up period, 3.3% of patients in the AR group underwent a TKA, which was significantly lower than the 33.3% of patients in the O group (p = 0.008). The hazard of TKA conversion is estimated to be 93.2% lower for patients in the AR group compared to the O group (p = 0.013). Our study found a significant improvement in all clinical outcome scores in the AR group at 2-year follow-up. There was a significantly larger increase in KOOS pain, KOOS symptom, and Lysholm scores in the AR group compared to the O group. The AR group also had a significantly lower conversion to TKA and significantly lower hazard of TKA conversion as compared to the O group. Surgical management showed higher functional outcomes and decreased TKA conversion rates as compared to observation and should be considered as a treatment option for the treatment of meniscal root tears in the older population.

Excellent medium-term survival of an all-inside tensionable knotted suture device justifies repair of most meniscal tears encountered during reconstructive knee ligament surgery.

All-inside meniscal repair devices have evolved to allow surgeons to undertake complex repairs in a timely and efficient manner. This is advantageous in active patients, where meniscus preservation is critical in preserving joint function and stability. The aim of the study was to evaluate the failure rate of all-inside meniscal repair performed in patients undergoing reconstructive ligament surgery using a particular meniscal repair device. Patients were identified using a single-site prospectively maintained patient registry. Primary outcome was failure, defined as return to surgery with documented failure of repair. Complication rates and functional scores were also recorded. Patients in whom meniscal repair failure was identified were further assessed, to identify any common features. Over an 8-year period, 323 patients underwent meniscal repair at the time of ligament reconstruction, compared to 244 meniscectomies. Of these, 286 patients underwent repair using an all-inside suture device. One-hundred and twenty-seven repairs were to the medial meniscus only, 124 were lateral, and in 35 patients both menisci were repaired. Follow-up was to a median of 51.5months. There were 31 (9.7%) failures reported at a median of 22months post-operatively (IQR 13.5-41.5). Medial repair failures were seen more frequently than lateral (13.6% versus 5.6% OR 2.62 95% CI 1.17-5.88 p = 0.022). Failure of ACL reconstruction was associated with meniscal repair failure (OR 5.83 95% CI 1.55-21.95 p = 0.0039). Multi-ligament reconstruction was undertaken in 70/286 patients receiving meniscal repair and was not associated with failure (OR 1.3 95% CI 0.57-2.98 p = 0.51). Mode number of all-inside sutures used was 3 in both medial and lateral repairs (Range 1-9 lateral; 1-7 medial). All-inside repair is a safe and versatile technique which can be used in the majority of meniscal tears encountered during ligament reconstruction with excellent mid-term success. Failure is seen more commonly in medial sided repairs and with failure of ACL reconstruction. IV.

The all-inside all-suture technique demonstrated better biomechanical behaviors in meniscus radial tear repair.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of three constructs and techniques for repair of radial tears of the meniscus. Thirty fresh frozen porcine menisci were divided equally into three groups consisting of (1) inside-out repair group, (2) a commonly used all-inside suture with anchor hybrid repair construct (AISAH) (Meniscal Cinch™), and (3) an all-inside all-suture repair construct (AIAS) (Knee Scorpion™). Radial tears were created and repaired and then the menisci were secured to the materials testing machine. Both cyclic loading and load-to-failure testing were performed. The displacement, stiffness, response to cyclic loading, and mode of failure were recorded and analyzed statistically. The displacement after cyclic loading (DACL) of the Cinch repair construct group was significantly higher than that of the inside-out repair construct group (p = 0.000) and AIAS repair construct (p = 0.000). There was not a statistical difference of DACL between inside-out and AIAS groups (n.s.). The inside-out construct failed at a significantly higher load than the AISAH repair construct (p = 0.000) and AIAS construct (p = 0.006). The AIAS construct failed at a significantly higher load than the AISAH repair construct (p = 0.009). The AIAS had a higher stiffness than AISAH (p = 0.047). The AIAS had a higher load at 3mm protrusion than AISAH (p = 0.034). The AIAS repair construct had better biomechanical behaviors than AISAH construct and inside-out repair technique. Inside-out sutures and AIAS repair construct had similar biomechanical responses to cyclic loading. The AIAS can be used for meniscus tear surgical repair with less damage to peri-meniscus tissues.

Posterolateral approach for all-inside arthroscopic lateral meniscus repair in athletes: technique and outcomes.

The past 2 decades have been marked by substantial progress in our knowledge of meniscus anatomy, function, and biomechanics, and also by the shifting of the surgical treatment of meniscal lesions from traditional meniscectomy towards arthroscopic repair to get away from the early osteoarthritis associated with meniscectomy. Posterior horn injuries of the lateral meniscus (LM) have been less studied due to their lower incidence and also due to the historical technical complexity of performing a repair in the posterolateral compartment. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed of all athletic patients who had a peripheral longitudinal tear of the lateral meniscal posterior horn and who underwent at least one repair procedure with a posterolateral approach between 2014 and 2018. The type of injury, extent of lateral meniscal tear, and characteristics of sutures placed were assessed. Clinical assessment included objective and subjective IKDC ratings. The Tegner activity level score was determined before the injury and at the last follow-up visit. Failure was defined as a need for revision surgery. All complications were documented. The study population comprised 24 athletes with a mean follow-up of 25.2 ± 10months. The Tegner activity level was exactly the same before the injury as after the surgery. The mean IKDC score significantly increased from 41.8 (12.2) before the surgery to 94.5 (9.1) after. There were four reoperations for failure (16.6%) that required a new suture repair. None of these revised repairs sustained a new failure as of the last follow-up. Despite the long learning curve, the posterolateral approach is a safe and effective technique for longitudinal tears of the posterior horn of the LM. The results of all-inside suture repair through a posterolateral portal are comparable to other techniques.

Prevalence, Development, and Factors Associated with Cyst Formation after Meniscal Repair with the All-Inside Suture Device

Aims and Objectives:The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence of cyst formation as a complication of all-inside meniscal suture device using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and analyze the risk factors.Materials and Methods:Of the patients who had undergone meniscal repair surgery 46 cases (46 knees) were selected to be in the case-control study. 51 menisci (34 medial menisci, 17 lateral menisci) of 46 cases were included to the study. Out of 51 menisci, 46 menisci combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures and had performed ACL reconstruction (ACLR). 5 cases (5 menisci) had been performed meniscal repair (MR). MRIs of the knee were performed 6, 12 and 24 months post-meniscal surgery. The MRIs were examined to detect the new development of cysts encasing the suture anchors and evaluate meniscal healing. Univariate and multivariate risk factor analyses was used to account for the suture technique (suture device alone versus suture device and inside-out suture repair), concurrent operation (MR alone versus MR with ACL reconstruction), patient gender, medial versus lateral menisci, number of device use, side-to-side difference of knee arthrometer, type of anchor (acetal resin versus PEEK material) and clinical scores (Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, IKDC score).Results:MRI examinations revealed cyst formation in 15 of 51 menisci. 3 menisci were detected cyst formation at 6 months of surgery, 9 at 12 months and 3 at 24 months. Only 3 patients (6.5%) were symptomatic. Tecxhniques using suture device alone was more likely to develop cysts: odds ratio (OR) was 10.67 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25 to 91.41). Medial meniscus statistically tended to develop cyst compared with lateral meniscus and OR was 7.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23 to 51.07). Patients who have instability (side-to-side difference of knee arthrometer > 3mm) are more likely to develop cysts than that ofless than or equal to 3mm (p = 0.06).Conclusion:This study revealed the risk factors and prevalence rate for cyst formation after using the all-inside meniscal suture device. The prevalence rate of cyst formation around suture implant was 29%, however most cases didn’t have any symptoms. Suture device only and medial meniscus were significant risk factors for cyst formation. Knee instability was greater in the cyst developed menisci though it was not significant, which suggested that knee instability could affect cyst formation around suture anchors.

Outcomes of Arthroscopic All-Inside Repair Versus Observation in Older Patients With Meniscus Root Tears

Background: Meniscus root tears lead to de-tensioning of the meniscus, increased contact forces, and cartilage damage. Management of older patients with root tears is controversial and the efficacy of different treatment options is unclear. Purpose: To compare the clinical outcomes of patients with moderate knee osteoarthritis who underwent an all-inside meniscus root repair technique versus nonoperative management for either medial or lateral meniscus root tears. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Patients with a diagnosed posterior meniscus root tear who underwent arthroscopic repair (AR: 30 knees) or nonoperative treatment with observation (O: 18 knees) were followed for a minimum of 2 years (mean follow-up, 4.4 years). The arthroscopic repair included all-inside sutures to reduce the root back to its remnant (reduction sutures), thereby re-tensioning the meniscus, and 1 mattress suture to strengthen the repair by reapproximating the construct to the posterior capsule. The data collected included the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lysholm, Tegner, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores and conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Results: Medial meniscus root tears comprised 80.0% of the AR group and 77.8% of the O group. The average Kellgren-Lawrence grade was 2 in both groups. The baseline scores for the KOOS Symptoms subscale were lower for AR (50.2 ± 19.3) than for O (66.5 ± 16.1) (P = .003), as were the KOOS Knee-Related Quality of Life scores (AR, 26.7 ± 16.1; O, 39.6 ± 22.1) (P = .046). No differences were found between groups for the absolute values at follow-up except that follow-up Tegner scores were lower in the O group than in the AR group (P = .004). Significant improvements were seen in the AR group from baseline to ultimate follow-up in average KOOS subscale scores (P < .001), Lysholm scores (P < .001), Tegner scores (P = .0002), and VR-12 PCS scores (P < .001), whereas the O group had a significant improvement only in average KOOS Pain (P = .003), KOOS Function in Daily Living (P = .006), and VR-12 PCS (P = .038) scores. Compared with the O group, the AR group had a significantly larger improvement from baseline to follow-up in average KOOS Pain (P = .009), KOOS Symptoms (P = .029), and Lysholm scores (P = .016). During follow-up, 3.3% of the AR group underwent a TKA compared with 33.3% of the O group (P = .008). The hazard ratio of TKA conversion was 93.2% lower for the AR group compared with the O group (P = .013). Conclusion: All-inside medial or lateral meniscus root repair showed improved functional outcomes and decreased TKA conversion rates compared with nonoperative treatment and may be considered as a treatment option for the management of meniscus root tears in older patients with moderate osteoarthritis.

Predictive Factors for Failure of Meniscal Repair: A Retrospective Dual-Center Analysis of 918 Consecutive Cases.

Background:Meniscal surgery is one of the most common surgical procedures performed by orthopaedic surgeons. Over the past decade, awareness has increased regarding the importance of meniscal preservation to prevent the development of osteoarthritis in the knee joint. Removal of meniscal tissue can lead to a high risk of cartilage degeneration, and moreover, meniscus-preserving surgery rather than meniscal resection is likely to have better long-term outcomes. Success rates after meniscal repair range from 60% to 95%, but many reports are based on a small number of patients.Purpose/Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to review all meniscal repairs and potential predictors for failure during a 12-year period. We hypothesized that meniscal anchors, lateral repairs, and repairs made in conjunction with an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) would have fewer failures than meniscal arrows, medial repairs, and isolated repairs. We also hypothesized that younger patients and acute tears would be associated with fewer failures.Study Design:Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:This study was a dual-center, retrospective analysis on consecutive meniscal repairs. The surgical protocols were reviewed, including type of tear, location, associated injury to the knee, and surgery. The study endpoint was failure of repair, defined as a need for reoperation and secondary partial or total meniscal resection, within 3 years. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess repair survival, with multivariate Cox regression to adjust for confounders.Results:A total of 954 meniscal repairs were performed on 918 patients (536 male patients [58%]; 382 female patients [42%]) with a mean age of 26 years (range, 12-60 years). The failure rate for the entire cohort was 22.5%. Bioabsorbable arrows had significantly more failures than all-inside sutures with anchors (hazard ratio [HR], 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.5; P = .002). Medial meniscal repairs had a higher failure rate than lateral meniscal repairs (HR, 3.7; 95% CI, 2.3-6.0; P < .001). Simultaneous ACLR resulted in less failure than when no simultaneous ACLR was performed (HR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.9; P = .009). Age at repair and acuity of tear did not affect the outcome (P = .6 and .07, respectively).Conclusion:The failure rate after meniscal repair was significantly higher on the medial side, especially when using arrows. Meniscal repairs performed concomitantly with an ACLR result in fewer reoperations.

Arthroscopic Treatment of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Avulsion Fracture: Physeal-Sparing, All-Inside Suture Bridge Repair

Arthroscopic Treatment of an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Avulsion Fracture: Physeal-Sparing, All-Inside Suture Bridge Repair

Avoiding Injury to the Popliteal Neurovascular Bundle in All-Inside Suturing of the Posterior Horn of the Lateral Meniscus: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment of Portal Selection and Safety

We assessed the risk of injury to the popliteal neurovascular bundle (PNVB) while suturing the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus (PHLM). We simulated all-inside suturing of the PHLM using magnetic resonance imaging of 60 knees. Lines were drawn from the medial and the lateral edges of the patellar tendon to the PHLM at increasing distances from the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) to simulate suturing device trajectory. Distance from each line to the PNVB was measured (d). A similar analysis was performed using lines drawn from 1cm medial and 1cm lateral to the patellar tendon. We compared the average "d" at increasing distances from the PCL, between the different simulated portal entry points. We have also analyzed the association between different demographic characteristics and the shortest distance from the PVNB to the PHLM. Of 1200 measurements performed, the simulated suturing trajectory transected the PNVB 343 times (28.6%). At 0mm from the PCL, the safest portal was the 1-cm lateral portal (P < .001), with an average "d" of 2.7mm. At 3mm, 6mm, 9mm, and 12mm from the PCL, the safest portal was the 1-cm medial portal (P < .001), with average "d" of 3.8mm, 6.9mm, 10.1mm, and 13.5mm, respectively. Average distance between the PHLM and the PNVB was 7.8mm. Shorter distance between the PHLM and the PNVB was associated with younger age and female sex (P= .014 and .001, respectively). All-inside suturing of the PHLM at 0mm from the PCL is safer with a more lateral portal. Beyond 3mm from the PCL, a more medial portal carries a lower risk to the PNVB. Young and female patients have a shorter distance between the PHLM and the PNVB, suggesting a greater risk for injury to the PNVB. Careful preoperative magnetic resonance imaging assessment may assist in safer portal selection when planning repair of the PHLM. This study describes a magnetic resonance imaging-based risk assessment for injury of the PVNB while suturing the PHLM. It allows the orthopaedic surgeon a better understanding of the anatomic relationship between the popliteal neurovascular bundle and the lateral meniscus and can assist in portal selection and safety.

Meniscal Allograft Transplantation With Soft-Tissue Fixation Including the Anterior Intermeniscal Ligament

Meniscal allograft transplantation has been introduced as a treatment for symptomatic meniscus-deficient patients to improve clinical outcomes. We describe an arthroscopic technique for meniscal allograft with soft-tissue fixation including the anterior intermeniscal ligament (AIML): arthroscopic double soft-tissue fixation technique. The AIML and anterior and posterior roots are detached and sutured using running locked Krackow stitches. After preparation of the meniscal bed, the meniscus is passed into the knee and the posterior meniscal horn is fixed with sutures through bone tunnels. The body of the meniscus is fixed with all-inside sutures. Then, the anterior meniscal suture is fixed on the anatomic point of the anterior root with an anchor. The AIML suture is fixed with an anchor to the bare area of the proximal tibia, anterior to the anterior cruciate ligament insertion. This reliable and reproducible technique is less complex than bone plug methods; it is less invasive but still provides stable and secure graft fixation. It will help surgeons to improve clinical results and to limit early secondary extrusion of the graft.

Avoiding Damage to the Popliteal Neurovascular Bundle in All-Inside Suturing of the Posterior Horn of the Lateral Meniscus: An MRI Assessment of Portal Selection and Safety

All-Inside suturing of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus (PHLM) carries a risk for a rare, however, possibly devastating injury to the popliteal neurovascular bundle (NVB). The purpose of this study is to assess the risk of damage to the PNVB while suturing the PHLM.

Widening of the popliteal hiatus on magnetic resonance imaging leads to recurrent subluxation of the lateral meniscus.

This study was undertaken to elucidate the clinical significance of widening of the popliteal hiatus on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to document the clinical results and technical aspects of arthroscopic repair of this finding. Included are 82 knees after arthroscopic surgery, divided according to arthroscopic diagnosis into group A, hypermobility of lateral meniscus, 8 knees; group B, tear of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus, 32 knees; and group C, no abnormality of the lateral meniscus, 36 knees with medial meniscal tears and 6 with other conditions. Popliteal hiatus diameter was measured and the popliteal hiatus/lateral tibial plateau (LTP) ratio was calculated on preoperative sagittal and coronal MRI. At arthroscopy, the widened popliteal hiatus in group A was tightened anteriorly by outside-in or all-inside suture and posteriorly with all-inside suture. Outcomes were evaluated with MRI, Lysholm, Tegner and VAS scores. The preoperative diameter of the popliteal hiatus and the popliteal hiatus/LTP ratio were significantly larger in group A than in groups B and C (p < 0.05) on both views. Threshold popliteal hiatus/LTP values of 0.16 and 0.18 on the sagittal and coronal views demonstrated diagnostic discrimination, and these values were significantly reduced after arthroscopy in Group A. Lysholm and Tegner scores were improved after tightening of the popliteal hiatus, while VAS scores reduced (all p < 0.05). Widening of the popliteal hiatus on MRI may lead to recurrent subluxation of the lateral meniscus. Arthroscopic anterior and posterior tightening of the popliteal hiatus was a safe and effective treatment. II.

All-Inside Suture Repair for Isolated Radial Tears at the Midbody of the Lateral Meniscus

In young athletes, radial tear of the midbody on the semilunar lateral meniscus in stable knees is most common. Conventionally, for this type of tear, meniscectomy has been considered as a first-line treatment. However, meniscectomy does not prevent degenerative change. Therefore, repair is another treatment option for a full radial tear, though this type of tear can be difficult to repair because of the lack of a vascular supply. Compared with conventional transcapsular suture techniques (e.g., inside-out/outside-in techniques or all-inside techniques with implants), all-inside suture (AIS) repair techniques can avoid bunching of the meniscus to the capsule. AIS is considered suitable for restoration of normal structure and movement of the meniscus after repair, which can be advantageous for meniscal healing. However, AIS repair for an isolated radial tear at the midbody of the lateral meniscus has rarely been reported. Therefore, we applied the AIS repair technique for isolated radial tear at the midbody of the semilunar lateral meniscus using a QuickPass SutureLasso with 2-0 FiberWire. This procedure is easier and less invasive, shortening the gap by drawing each stump of the meniscus in the direction of the circumference.

Meniscus Tear Management: Indications, Technique, and Outcomes

Meniscus tears are commonly encountered in the clinical and operative setting and vary in presentation, including bucket-handle, radial, and horizontal cleavage tears. Historically, tears were treated with benign neglect or partial meniscectomy. However, a great deal of subsequent research has highlighted the biomechanical consequences of tears and meniscectomy, including increased peak local contact forces, progressive postmeniscectomy arthritis, and subsequent arthroplasty. With the advent and evolution of repair devices, increasing attention is being turned to the ideal restorative treatment of meniscus tears. Successful meniscus repair is centered about the ABCs of repair: Anatomic reduction, Biologic preparation and augmentation, and Circumferential compression. Recent advances in repair techniques have included microfracture of the intercondylar notch to provide healing factors and marrow cells for augmented healing, all-inside suture devices enabling the reduction and fixation tears without the need for additional assistants and the morbidity of inside-out exposure, and circumferential compression combined with clot augmentation to reduce and fix horizontal cleavage tears and recreate biomechanics to within 15% of baseline contact forces. Clinical outcomes of meniscus repair using modern techniques have been promising, with reapproximation of native joint biomechanics, substantial improvements in patient subjective outcome scores, and satisfactory reoperation rates. With implementation of the ABCs of meniscus repair as well as the continued expansion of the orthopedic surgeons' meniscus repair toolbox, restoration and preservation of the meniscus are increasingly possible across the spectrum of tear types.

A novel suture technique to reduce the meniscus extrusion in the pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears.

The medial meniscus (MM) posterior root has important functions in preventing an excessive loading stress during knee motion and degeneration of the articular cartilage. Although the transtibial pullout repair has become the gold standard for MM posterior root tears (MMPRTs), MM extrusion remains. In addition, during knee extension to deep flexion, the MM posterior segment in the MMPRT knee has been shown to translate toward the posteromedial direction, causing a notable MM posterior extrusion. Thus, the reduction in the MM posteromedial extrusion is one of the important postoperative outcomes to restore the meniscal function and eventually prevent the progression of knee osteoarthritis. The present technical note describes an arthroscopic technique addition to the pullout repair, in which an all-inside suture is inserted into the posteromedial part of the MM to reduce the MM posteromedial extrusion.

Outcomes of Arthroscopic Repair versus Observation in Older Patients

Objectives: Meniscal root tears occur in a bimodal distribution, affecting both young healthy athletes and older patients with early degenerative knees. Root tears lead to de-tensioning of the meniscus and have been associated with increased contact forces and cartilage damage. Management of older patients with root tears is controversial and the efficacy of different treatment options is unclear. The primary aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing an all-inside arthroscopic repair technique versus non-operative management for posterior meniscal root tears. Methods: 48 patients diagnosed with a posterior meniscal root tear between 2006 and 2015 were identified and divided into 2 groups, the arthroscopic repair group (AR, 30 knees), and the observation group (O: 18 knees). The AR group underwent a meniscal root repair technique where two all-inside sutures were used to reduce the root back to its remnant (reduction sutures) thereby re-tensioning the meniscus. One mattress suture was then added to strengthen the repair and repair the construct to the posterior capsule. KOOS subscores (Symptoms, Pain, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Sports and Rec, Quality of Life), Lysholm, Tegner, and VR12 PCS questionnaires were used as the primary outcome measures at a minimum 2 years follow-up. Differences in baseline patient characteristics between the surgical and non-surgical group were examined using Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables. For changes from baseline to follow up between the surgical and non-surgical group, independent sample t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted depending on normality. A Fisher’s exact test was also utilized to analyze the rates of conversation to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between the surgical and non-surgical group. Results: There were significant changes in all baseline to follow up mean KOOS subscores (all subscores: p &lt; 0.001), Lysholm (p &lt; 0.001), Tegner (p = 0.0002), and VR12 PCS (p &lt; 0.001) scores for the AR group, while the O group had a significant difference in only mean KOOS pain (p = 0.003), KOOS ADL (p = 0.006), and VR12 PCS (p = 0.038) scores from baseline to follow-up. The AR group had a significantly larger increase from baseline to follow up in mean KOOS pain scores (32.0) compared to the O group (15.7) (p = 0.009), KOOS symptom scores (AR: 24.2, O: 9.3, p = 0.029) as well as in Lysholm scores (AR: 27.3 and O: 7.1; p = 0.016). During the follow-up period, 3.3% of patients in the AR group underwent a TKA, which was significantly lower than the 33.3% of patients in the O group (p = 0.008). The hazard of TKA conversion is estimated to be 93.2% lower for patients in the AR group compared to the O group (p = 0.013). Conclusion: Our study found a significant improvement in all clinical outcome scores in the AR group at 2-year follow-up. There was a significantly larger increase in KOOS pain, KOOS symptom, and Lysholm scores in the AR group compared to the O group. The AR group also had a significantly lower conversion to TKA and significantly lower hazard of TKA conversion as compared to the O group. Surgical management showed higher functional outcomes and decreased TKA conversion rates as compared to observation and should be considered as a treatment option for the treatment of meniscal root tears in the older population.

Femoral Avulsion of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament in a Multiligament Setting: A Unique Case.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) femoral avulsions are a rare entity mainly seen in children. We describe a unique case of a bony ACL avulsion with a medial collateral ligament (MCL) and lateral meniscus (LM) tear in a 37-year-old patient who sustained a two-wheeler accident. The ACL femoral avulsion was fixed arthroscopically using a Knee Scorpion and a FiberTape fixed over a suture disc on the lateral cortex. The MCL was repaired with an internal brace using a FiberTape and two SwiveLocks and the torn LM was repaired using all-inside sutures. At 2 years of follow-up, the fragment was united, knee range of motion was 0° to 130°, and Knee Society Score was 98. This is the first case report of a femoral avulsion of the ACL combined with an MCL injury and a meniscus tear where all three were repaired with a unique technique and good results were obtained.

Prevalence, development, and factors associated with cyst formation after meniscal repair with the all-inside suture device.

To investigate the prevalence of cyst formation after using all-inside meniscal repair device and analysed the risk factors associated with it. Between August 2008 and September 2013, 51 menisci of 46 patients were included in the study, 46 menisci of which had concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures and had an ACL reconstruction. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee was performed at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after meniscal surgery. The MRIs were assessed to detect the development of cysts encasing the suture anchors and to evaluate meniscal healing. Statistical analysis was performed using multiple regression analysis. Out of the 51 menisci examined, MRI revealed cysts in 15 menisci. Cysts were detected in 3 menisci at 6 months, in 9 menisci at 12 months, and in 3 menisci at 24 months after surgery. Only 3 patients (6.5%) were symptomatic, and cystectomy was performed in 2 of these patients and arthroscopic debridement in the other. Compared with using both the suture device and an inside-out suture repair, using the suture device alone was more likely to be associated with cyst development [odds ratio (OR), 12.04]. The medial meniscus was also significantly more likely to develop a cyst compared with the lateral meniscus (OR, 12.48). There was an increased outcome for the number of device use (P = 0.033). Though it was not statistically significant, the patients with anterior knee laxity (side-to-side difference > 3mm using a knee arthrometer) were more likely to develop cysts than those without anterior knee laxity (P = 0.06). There were no significant differences between the remaining variables. The prevalence of cyst formation around the suture implant was 29%, but most cases were not symptomatic. Significant risk factors for cyst formation included the use of a suture device alone, and a location in the medial meniscus. III.

Outcome of combined all-inside and outside-in arthroscopic meniscal repair: long-term study

Background The long-term unfavorable consequences of meniscectomy, either partial or total, are well documented. The purpose of the current study is to demonstrate the long-term clinical outcome after arthroscopic meniscal repair using combined all-inside and outside-in techniques.Patients and methods A retrospective study of patients who underwent meniscal repair was conducted between December 2005 and October 2013. A total of 48 patients were included (42 males and six females), with an average age of 24.3 years (range, 10–38 years) at operation. Meniscal repairs were done using combined outside-in and all-inside techniques. All meniscal tears were repaired using one Fast-Fix posterior all-inside suture and multiple outside-in sutures using the remaining Ultrabraid suture and PDS no. 2-0 nonabsorbable suture.Results Only four cases required a second procedure (partial meniscectomy). At the final follow-up of an average of 80.11 months (range, 24–121 months), the average International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score of the meniscus repair group was 95.18±3.9, and the Lysholm score was 93.93±4.54.Conclusion Combined all-inside and outside-in arthroscopic meniscal repair is a safe and a cheap technique, with a good long-term clinical outcome.

An anatomical examination of iatrogenic nerve injury during inside out meniscus repair with flexion and extension of the knee.

In this study, we aim to assess the safe, risky and high-risky zones by measuring the proximity of the needles to the peroneal and saphenous nerves in millimeters for the repair of tears of the anterior, middle and posterior horns of the medial and lateral menisci at flexion and extension position during inside-out repair technique. First, a cadaveric study was conducted on 10 cadaver knees in which both (lateral and medial) menisci were divided into anterior, corpus and posterior with the longitudinal tear simulating in each section. The next phase involved the suture of the simulated tears of the menisci while the knee was at 90° of flexion and full extension. Finally, the distance from the exit points of the K-wire being inserted through meniscal anterior, corpus and posterior tears to the aforementioned nerves was measured with a digital caliper. The distance between K-wire exit points and neurovascular structures concerning corpus and anterior horn tear repair of both menisci were considered far away and not included. However, closer posterior menisci measurements were taken to avoid the risk of iatrogenic nerve injury. The measured distances for lateral meniscus posterior tears were recorded 11±5.2 mm at 90° of flexion and 8±4.5 mm at extension, whereas those recorded 17.3±5.7 mm at 90° of flexion and 13.7±4.7 mm at extension for medial meniscus. These variables were evaluated statistically using a paired t-test; the mean of t value was not considered statistically significant. Our results show that the inside-out technique at knee flexion is safe even in the posterior meniscus tears. However, safety distance can be increased with the higher flexion degrees of the knee. Lastly, in posterior meniscal tear repair, we recommend either retractor assisted mini-open technique at knee flexion, or all-inside suture technique, to avoid nerve injury risk in this zone. Although many surgeons do not prefer inside-out techniques for posterior menisci tears, inside-out posterior meniscal repair of both menisci is as safe as an all-inside technique using retractor assisted mini-open technique with the knee at higher than 90° flexion.