The three randomized trials comparing endovascular aneurysm repair (rEVAR) with open surgical repair (rOSR) of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) were poorly designed and heavily criticized. The short- and long-term survival advantages of rEVAR remain unclear. We sought to compare the two treatment modalities using a propensity-matched analysis in a real-world setting. All rOSR and rEVAR procedures in the Vascular Quality Initiative were analyzed (2003-2018). Raw and propensity-matched rEVAR and rOSR cohorts were compared. Primary outcomes included postoperative major adverse events (MAEs; cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, bowel/limb ischemia, reoperation) and 30-day and 1-year mortality. Univariate, multivariate, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed. There were 4929 rAAA repairs performed, 2749 rEVAR and 2180 rOSR. Compared with rEVAR, rOSR had higher myocardial ischemia events (15% vs 10%; P < .001), MAEs (67% vs 37%; P < .001), and 30-day death (34% vs 21%; P < .001; Table I). On adjusted analysis, rOSR was predictive of 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-2.2). After 1:1 matching, the study cohort consisted of 724 pairs of rOSR and rEVAR patients. The rOSR patients had twice the length of stay (median, 10 days [interquartile range, 5-19 days] vs 5 days [interquartile range, 3-10 days]; P < .001). Univariate analysis demonstrated persistent increased 30-day mortality after rOSR (32% vs 18%; P < .001) and higher rates of myocardial infarction (rOSR 14% vs rEVAR 8%; P = .002), respiratory complications (38% vs 20%; P < .001), and acute kidney injury (42% vs 26%; P < .001). Overall MAE rate was higher after rOSR (68% vs 35%; P < .001). Multivariable regression analysis of the propensity-matched pairs demonstrated that rOSR was associated with double the 30-day mortality compared with rEVAR (odds ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-2.8; Table II). All-cause 1-year survival was 73% and 59% after rEVAR and rOSR in the propensity-matched cohort, respectively (P < .001). This is the largest study of rAAA demonstrating clear short- and long-term survival benefit of rEVAR over rOSR that persisted after matching on all major demographic, comorbid, and anatomic variables. Furthermore, patients undergoing rOSR had twice the length of stay with increased rates of complications compared with rEVAR. These data suggest a more aggressive endovascular approach for rAAA in patients with suitable anatomy.Table IDemographics of matched and nonmatched patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair (rEVAR) or open surgical repair (rOSR) of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA)NonmatchedMatchedrEVAR (n = 2749)rOSR (n = 2180)P valuerEVARa (n = 724)rOSRa (n = 724)P valueDemographics Age, years73 (66-81)72 (66-79)<.00172 (66-80)72 (66-79).79 Sex, female586 (21)475 (22).68127 (19)162 (22).10 White race2392 (87)1984 (91)<.001653 (90)660 (91).53Comorbidities Smoking history2083 (77)1761 (84)<.001590 (82)579 (80).46 CHF337 (13)196 (9)<.00159 (8)67 (9).46 COPD780 (29)705 (33).002217 (30)224 (31).69 ESRD45 (2)16 (1).011 (0.1)1 (0.1)1Anatomic Prior AAA repair73 (3)217 (10)<.00117 (2)19 (3).74 Maximum AAA diameter, mm71 (60-85)77 (64-90)<.00175 (63-89)75 (63-89)1 Iliac aneurysmal disease615 (24)476 (23).23179 (26)159 (22).12AAA, Abdominal aortic aneurysm; CHF, congestive heart failure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ESRD, end-stage renal disease.Categorical variables are presented as number (%). Continuous variables are presented as median (interquartile range).aMatched on type of operative repair, age, race, smoking history, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, end-stage renal disease, prior AAA repair, maximal aortic sac diameter, preoperative medications. Open table in a new tab Table IIPredictors of 30-day mortality after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) repair in both unmatched (model 1) and matched (model 2) cohortsOR (95% CI)P valueModel 1: Unmatched cohorta Open operative repair1.86 (1.56-2.23)<.001 Age ≥60 years2.06 (1.33-3.20).001 Female sex1.53 (1.24-1.90)<.001 Obese1.32 (1.09-1.58).004 Congestive heart failure1.38 (1.04-1.83).03 Maximal AAA diameter ≥71 mm1.38 (1.06-1.81).02Model 2: Propensity-matched cohortb Open operative repair2.14 (1.66-2.77)<.001 Age ≥60 years2.59 (1.34-5.00).01 Female sex1.46 (1.07-1.98).02 Obese1.48 (1.14-1.93).004 Hypertension0.55 (0.41-0.74)<.001AAA, Abdominal aortic aneurysm; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.aAdjusts for type of repair, age, sex, race, obesity, smoking history, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, maximal aortic diameter, iliac aneurysmal disease.bAdjusts for type of repair, age, sex, obesity, smoking history, hypertension, preoperative medications, congestive heart failure, maximal aortic diameter, iliac aneurysmal disease. Open table in a new tab
Read full abstract