Where Are We Now? Viral transmission from allograft tissue is rare, but when it occurs, it can be a life-threatening complication. Bacterial infections following allograft reconstructions are both common and limb-threatening. Minimizing the risks are crucial for patient safety. Therefore, any attention we can focus on graft sterilization is effort well spent. The sterilization process—cleaning, defatting, and storing the allograft—must be safe, efficient, and effective. Currently, sterilization generally uses ionizing radiation. Ethylene oxide and autoclave treatments are no longer used because of toxicity, loss of strength of the material, and loss of osteoinductive properties caused by the denaturation of proteins or the alkylation of amino acids [1, 2, 4-6]. Instead, the current standard is gamma-radiation sterilization because of its convenience and effectiveness both against bacterial contaminants as well as viral transmission (HIV and Hepatitis C). However, irradiation damages the collagenous fiber system by cracking the polymer chains and alkylation of free radicals. Crosslinking or free radical scavenging could reduce the damage caused by irradiation. Since both are achieved with chemical solutions, it is important to validate the penetration depth of the chemicals applied. Where Do We Need To Go? In order to achieve safe and efficient graft sterilization, we must combine different treatments. The combination of the safest chemical treatment with the lowest irradiation dose can balance the disadvantages of each of those two approaches. The collagenous fibers resist ice crystal damage, the ground substance, however, not, resulting in loss of tension of the fiber pattern. This is well known from electron microscopy and can be counteracted by antifreezing solutions like dimethylsulfoxide [3]. How Do We Get There? Because most of the radioprotective treatments include chemical solutions, it is important to understand how fast and how deep the radioprotectives can penetrate mineralized bone. Scanning electron microscopy, in combination with a fatigue test, may yield valuable information regarding the integrity of collagenous fiber pattern. Finally, mechanical strength should be compared across the various processing approaches, particularly focusing on fatigue strength, since that is the mode of failure of greatest clinical relevance.