A California high school serving low-income students from many ethnicities is famous for its outstanding mathematics department. On independently designed assessments, students at the school consistently outperform students in wealthier schools. Why, then, Ms. Boaler wonders, has the school received a demoralizing underperforming label from the state? THIS IS A STORY about a remarkable school, a school that has been labeled underperforming by the state of California. It is a true story, and it draws on a combination of research data, collected as part of a Stanford University research project on mathematics learning, and the lived realities of teachers and students working hard to achieve success in a low-income, urban school. At the heart of this story lies the conflict between learning and SAT-9 success, a conflict that has affected the lives of students and teachers in this school in profound ways. As a new professor at Stanford University, recently arrived from England, I was considering schools to include in a study of mathematics teaching and learning. I soon learned that a school that I'll refer to here as Railside High had a mathematics department that worked in very unusual ways. Some years ago the teachers detracked their classes in response to the low performance of some students. The mathematics department plans lessons collaboratively, and the teachers meet every week to discuss and improve their lessons. They visit one another's classes frequently, and every new teacher is given the opportunity to watch every lesson that he or she will teach being taught by an experienced colleague first. The algebra curriculum that all students take on entry to the school was designed by the department, and it draws from a variety of different curriculum materials. Students from a range of ethnicities -- Latino, African American, white, Filipino, and other Asian groups -- work together in groups to solve complex mathematics problems. All the teachers in the department are mathematics specialists, and they all regularly attend professional conferences as a department. These practices would be unusual for any school, but this is a school in a low-income area with few resources. Lessons are accompanied by the steady hum of cars zipping past on the two freeways that surround the school and are interrupted at frequent intervals by the sound of trains that pass just feet away from the school yard (thus our chosen pseudonym for the school). Financial resources are low -- in the school and in the students' homes. Yet qualified mathematics teachers are queuing up to join this department, and, after a year of studying and monitoring the mathematics teaching and learning in this school, we have discovered some unequivocally positive facts. As part of a research project funded by the National Science Foundation, my research team and I gave incoming students at three high schools a mathematics examination. The students starting Railside High scored at a significantly lower level than the students starting the other -- wealthier - - schools in our study. However, after one year at Railside High, the students attained a higher average score on the end-of-year algebra examination than the students at the other schools in the study. By the end of the second year at the school, Railside students were significantly outperforming students at the other schools. There is one other high school in Railside's district -- in a wealthier area. At the end of each course (algebra, geometry, trigonometry, etc.) both high schools give students the same final examinations, designed to carefully assess the competencies specified in the California mathematics standards. These exams are constructed and graded by the two departments and overseen by the district. In all three years that the exams have been given, the Railside students have significantly outperformed their wealthier counterparts at every level of mathematics. …
Read full abstract