ALDH1A1 Levels Research Articles

Abstract 492: ALDH1A1 expression predicts for a tumorigenic subset in primary cultures of malignant pleural effusions (MPE)

Abstract Aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDHs) are a group of enzymes that are responsible for oxidation of a variety of aldehydes. ALDH isoforms (ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1) are highly expressed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines. Recent evidence suggests that elevated levels of these enzymes may be associated with malignant behavioral properties of cell subsets in epithelial malignancies. It is not known whether cell subsets with high ALDH expression are present in advance stage lung cancer patients, or whether ALDH expression is associated with malignant behaviors (e.g. tumorigenicity) in lung cancer cell subsets. We hypothesized that the ALDH1A1-biomarker is present in advanced lung cancer, and that as in other epithelial malignancies, its expression predicts for lethal behavioral properties. We isolated lung tumor cells from advanced stage lung cancer patients (MPE), and maintained them in primary culture in presence of MPE fluid (an “autologous tumor microenvironment”). ALDH labeling by immunohistological methods revealed high intratumoral variability with respect to biomarker expression. To live detect MPE-primary culture cells, the Aldefluor (StemCell Technologies Inc.) method of Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) was used. 4-8% of MPE-primary culture cells expressed high level of ALDH1A1, whereas the majority of the cultured cells expressed intermediate or low levels of ALDH1A1. Interestingly, the ALDH1A1hi cell subset also expressed high levels of the CD44 surface biomarker. CD44 is another widely studied biomarker that has been associated with “cancer stem cell” properties. The ALDH1A1hi subset co-expresses 2 to 20 times higher CD44 expression, as compared to the ALDH1A1lo subset. Importantly, the cells that dually label for CD44hi and ALDH1A1hi exhibit increased soft agar colony forming efficiency in vitro, and increased tumorigencity in vivo. Limiting dilution studies of xenotransplantation in NOD/SCID mice also provide experimental evidence that clinical (MPE) biospecimens of some lung cancers possess ALDH1A1hi/CD44hi “cancer stem cells” (as evidenced by tumorigenesis following less than 1000 implanted cells). The tumors that emerge from the implantation of these lung “cancer stem cells” display phenotypic heterogeneity with respect to both CD44 and ALDHA1 expression. Collectively, these data provide experimental evidence for tumorigenic subsets in clinical lung cancer biospecimens, and suggest that ALDHA1 and CD44 expression are jointly regulated by a common oncogenic program in lung cancer cells. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 492. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-492

ChemInform Abstract: Aldehyde Dehydrogenase-Mediated Cellular Relative Insensitivity to the Oxazaphosphorines

As judged by findings in preclinical models, determinants of cellular sensitivity to cyclophosphamide and other oxazaphosphorines include two cytosolic aldehyde dehydrogenases, viz., ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1. Each catalyzes the detoxification of the oxazaphosphorines; thus, cellular sensitivity to these agents decreases as cellular levels of ALDH1A1 and/or ALDH3A1 increase. Of particular clinical relevance may be that stable sublines, relatively insensitive to the oxazaphosphorines due to elevated ALDH1A1 or ALDH3A1 levels, emerged when cultured human tumor cells were exposed only once to a high concentration of one of these agents for 30 to 60 minutes. Whether differences in cellular levels of either enzyme accounts for the clinically-encountered uneven therapeutic effectiveness of the oxazaphosphorines remains to be determined. However, it has already been established that measurable levels of these enzymes are found in some, but not all, tumor types, and that in those tumor types where measurable levels are present, e.g., infiltrating ductal carcinomas of the breast, they vary widely from patient to patient. Potentially useful clinical strategies that might be pursued if it turns out that ALDH1A1 and/or ALDH3A1 are, indeed, clinically operative determinants of cellular sensitivity to the oxazaphosphorines include 1) individualizing cancer chemotherapeutic regimens based, at least in part, on the levels of these enzymes in the malignancy of interest, and 2) sensitizing tumor cells that express relatively large amounts of ALDH1A1 and/or ALDH3A1 to the oxazaphosphorines by preventing the synthesis of these enzymes, e.g., with antisense RNA, or by introducing an agent that directly inhibits the catalytic action of the operative enzyme. Further, the fact that ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1 are determinants of cellular sensitivity to the oxazaphosphorines provides the rationale for the investigation of two additional strategies with clinical potential, viz., decreasing the sensitivity of vulnerable and essential normal cells, e.g., pluripotent hematopoietic cells, to the oxazaphosphorines by selectively transferring into them the genetic information that encodes 1) ALDH1A1 or ALDH3A1, or 2) a signaling factor, the presence of which would directly or indirectly, stably upregulate the expression of these enzymes.

Retinoid metabolism and ALDH1A2 (RALDH2) expression are altered in the transgenic adenocarcinoma mouse prostate model

Retinoids, which include vitamin A (retinol) and metabolites such as retinoic acid, can inhibit tumor growth and reverse carcinogenesis in animal models of prostate cancer. We analyzed retinoid signaling and metabolism in the TRAMP (transgenic adenocarcinoma mouse prostate) model. We detected increased retinol and retinyl esters in prostates pooled from 24 to 36 week TRAMP transgenic positive mice compared to nontransgenic littermates by HPLC. We used quantitative RT-PCR to measure transcripts for genes involved in retinoid signaling and metabolism, including ALDH1A1, ALDH1A2, ALDH1A3, CYP26A1, LRAT, and RARβ 2, in prostate tissue from TRAMP positive (+) and age-matched littermate control mice ranging from 18 to 36 weeks. Transcript levels of ALDH1A1, a putative stem cell marker, were decreased in ventral and lateral lobes of prostates from TRAMP mice compared to age-matched, nontransgenic mice. ALDH1A2 (RALDH2) mRNA levels in dorsal and anterior lobes of TRAMP+ mice were lower than in age-matched (24 week) nontransgenic mice. We detected lower RARβ 2 mRNA levels in dorsal prostate lobes of 36 week TRAMP mice relative to nontransgenic mice. We detected high levels of ALDH1A2 protein in the cytoplasm and nucleus in nontransgenic murine prostate paraffin sections, and lower ALDH1A2 protein levels in all prostate lobes of TRAMP mice compared to nontransgenic mice by immunohistochemistry. We also detected much lower cytoplasmic ALDH1A2 protein levels in all human prostate cancer paraffin sections stained (19 total) relative to normal human prostate tissue on the same sections. Our data indicate that this reduction in ALDH1A2 protein is an early event in human prostate cancer.

Identification of pancreatic cancer invasion-related proteins by proteomic analysis

Background Markers of pancreatic cancer invasion were investigated in two clonal populations of the cell line, MiaPaCa-2, Clone #3 (high invasion) and Clone #8 (low invasion) using proteomic profiling of an in vitro model of pancreatic cancer.Materials and methods Using 2D-DIGE followed by MALDI-TOF MS, two clonal sub-populations of the pancreatic cancer cell line, MiaPaCa-2 with high and low invasive capacities were incubated on matrigel 24 hours prior to analysis to stimulate cell-ECM contact and mimic in vivo interaction with the basement membrane.Results Sixty proteins were identified as being differentially expressed (> 1.2 fold change and p ≤ 0.05) between Clone #3 and Clone #8. Proteins found to have higher abundance levels in the highly invasive Clone #3 compared to the low invasive Clone #8 include members of the chaperone activity proteins and cytoskeleton constituents whereas metabolism-associated and catalytic proteins had lower abundance levels. Differential protein expression levels of ALDH1A1, VIM, STIP1 and KRT18 and GAPDH were confirmed by immunoblot. Using RNAi technology, STIP1 knockdown significantly reduced invasion and proliferation of the highly invasive Clone #3. Knockdown of another target, VIM by siRNA in Clone #3 cells also resulted in decreased invasion abilities of Clone #3. Elevated expression of STIP1 was observed in pancreatic tumour tissue compared to normal pancreas, whereas ALDH1A1 stained at lower levels in pancreatic tumours, as detected by immunohistochemistry.Conclusion Identification of targets which play a role in the highly invasive phenotype of pancreatic cancer may help to understand the biological behaviour, the rapid progression of this cancer and may be of importance in the development of new therapeutic strategies for pancreatic cancer.

ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1 expression in lung cancers: Correlation with histologic type and potential precursors

We hypothesize that aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) isozymes may be upregulated in lung tissue as a result of exposure to carcinogenic aldehydes found in cigarette smoke. To investigate this hypothesis, we studied the expression of two ALDH isozymes in lung cancer from patient samples and its relationship to the history of cigarette smoking. Immunohistochemical staining for ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1 was performed on archival specimens from control patients without lung cancer, and patients with one of the primary lung cancers: squamous cell cancer (SCCA), adenocarcinoma (AdenoCA), and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). An overall score was obtained for each sample based upon multiplying the staining intensity (0-3) and the extensiveness (0-100%). Mean+/-S.E.M. for each experimental group was calculated and compared. Our results indicate a significantly higher level of expression of ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1 in SCCA (155+/-19 and 162+/-17, respectively) and AdenoCA (116+/-12 and 107+/-10) than SCLC (39+/-11 and 42+/-12) (P<0.01). Atypical pneumocytes demonstrated significantly higher levels of expression of ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1 than normal pneumocytes (a normal counterpart of AdenoCA), which is suggestive of up regulation during malignant transformation to AdenoCA. A subset analysis of all samples studied revealed increased expression of ALDH1A1 (P=0.055) and ALDH3A1 (P=0.0093) in normal pneumocytes of smokers (n=32) in comparison to those of non-smokers (n=17). Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) express very high levels of ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1 in comparison with SCLC, elevated expression of both enzymes may be associated with malignant transformation to AdenoCA, and cigarette smoking seems to result in increased expression of these enzymes in normal pneumocytes.

The Role of Retinoid X Receptor α in Regulating Alcohol Metabolism

There is substantial overlap in retinol and alcohol metabolism. Mice that lack retinoic acid (RA) receptor retinoid X receptor alpha (RXRalpha) expression in the liver are more susceptible to alcoholic liver disease. To investigate the interaction between RXRalpha and alcoholic liver disease, ethanol metabolism was studied in hepatocyte RXRalpha-deficient [RXRalpha knockout (KO)] mice. Hepatocyte RXRalpha deficiency resulted in a significant increase in hepatic alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) activity, ADH1 protein, but not Adh1 mRNA. Polysomal distribution analysis indicated that more polysome-associated Adh1 mRNA was present in the mutant mouse livers, suggesting increased ADH1 protein synthesis in RXRalpha KO mice compared with wild-type mice. However, ADH2 and ADH3 enzyme activities were not affected by RXRalpha deficiency. Although ethanol clearance was increased, acetaldehyde elimination was reduced when RXRalpha was not expressed in the liver. Both mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) 2 and cytosolic ALDH activities were reduced in the mutant mice compared with the wild type. Western blot analysis revealed that the levels of ALDH1A1 and ALDH1A2 were decreased in the mutant mice. Semiquantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction indicated that liver Aldh1a1 mRNA level was also reduced due to the lack of RXRalpha expression. Thus, RXRalpha differentially affects ADH and ALDH activity, leading to an increase in alcohol clearance, but a reduction in acetaldehyde elimination. In addition, CYP2E1 as well as mitochondrial and cytosolic glutathione S-transferase activities were significantly lower in RXRalpha KO mice than in wild-type mice. Our results reveal the central role of RXRalpha in ethanol metabolism.

Transient induction of increased aldehyde dehydrogenase 3A1 levels in cultured human breast (adeno)carcinoma cell lines via 5′-upstream xenobiotic, and electrophile, responsive elements is, respectively, estrogen receptor-dependent and -independent

Transient up-regulation of ALDH3A1, CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 transcription by transient exposure to aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) ligands, e.g. 3-methylcholanthrene, is via transient transactivation of xenobiotic responsive elements (XRE) present in the 5′-upstream regions of these genes. Others have shown that AhR ligand-mediated induction of increased CYP1A1 levels in cultured human breast (adeno)carcinoma cell lines is apparently estrogen receptor (ER)-dependent, i.e. it was observed in ER + cell lines but not in ER − cell lines, whereas AhR ligand-mediated induction of increased CYP1B1 levels is ER-independent, i.e. it was observed in both ER + and ER − cell lines. The present investigation established that transient, AhR ligand/XRE-mediated induction of increased ALDH3A1 levels in human breast (adeno)carcinoma cell lines was, like that of CYP1A1 and unlike that of CYP1B1, apparently ER-dependent. Thus, transient exposure to 3-methylcholanthrene induced increased levels of ALDH3A1 in five cultured human breast (adeno)carcinoma cell lines that were documented as being ER +, viz., MCF-7/0, MCF-7/OAP, T-47D, ZR-75-1 and MDA-MB-468, but failed to induce increased levels of this enzyme in four cultured human breast (adeno)carcinoma cell lines that have been historically viewed as being ER −, viz., MDA-MB-231, SK-BR-3, HS-578-T and MDA-MB-435. Somewhat at odds with the foregoing, transient exposure to 3-methylcholanthrene also induced increased levels of ALDH3A1 and CYP1A1 in cultured, essentially ER −, human breast epithelial MCF-10A cells. These cells, like cultured human breast (adeno)carcinoma cells, are immortal, but unlike the latter, are not tumorigenic. Transient induction of increased ALDH3A1 levels can also be effected by agents that are not AhR ligands, viz., electrophiles such as catechol, and thus, cannot up-regulate ALDH3A1 transcription via transactivation of a 5′-upsteam region XRE. Rather, they are thought to up-regulate ALDH3A1 transcription via transient transactivation of an electrophile responsive element (EpRE) that is putatively also present in the 5′-upstream region of this gene. Electrophile-initiated/EpRE-mediated induction of increased ALDH3A1 levels was found to be ER-independent. Thus, catechol transiently induced increased levels of ALDH3A1 in the five ER + human breast (adeno)carcinoma cell lines, the four ER − human breast (adeno)carcinoma cell lines, and the ER −, immortal but not tumorigenic, human breast epithelial cell line.

Cellular levels of aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1) as predictors of therapeutic responses to cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy of breast cancer: a retrospective study. Rational individualization of oxazaphosphorine-based cancer chemotherapeutic regimens.

In preclinical models, established molecular determinants of cellular sensitivity to cyclophosphamide, long a mainstay of chemotherapeutic regimens used to treat breast cancers, include the aldehyde dehydrogenases that catalyze the detoxification of this agent, namely, ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1. As judged by bulk quantification of relevant catalytic activities, as well as of relevant proteins (ELISAs), tissue levels of these enzymes vary widely in primary and metastatic breast malignancies. Thus, interindividual variation in the activity of either of these enzymes in breast cancers could contribute to the wide variation in clinical responses obtained when such regimens are used to treat these malignancies. Direct evidence for this notion was sought in the present investigation. Cellular levels of ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1 in 171 repository human breast tumor (122 primary and 49 metastatic) samples were semiquantified using immunocytochemical staining. Clinical responses were retrieved from the archived medical records of each of 48 metastatic breast cancer sample donors, 26 of whom had been treated with a cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapeutic regimen subsequent to tumor sampling and 22 of whom had not. The premise that cellular levels of ALDH1A1 and/or ALDH3A1 predict clinical responses to cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapeutic regimens was submitted to statistical analysis. Confirming an earlier report, ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1 levels varied widely in both primary and metastatic breast tumor cells. When measurably present, each of the enzymes appeared to be evenly distributed throughout a given tumor cell population. Retrospective analysis indicated that cellular levels of ALDH1A1, but not those of ALDH3A1, were (1) significantly higher in metastatic tumor cells that had survived exposure to cyclophosphamide than in those that had not been exposed to this drug, and (2) significantly higher in metastatic tumors that did not respond (tumor size did not decrease or even increased) to subsequent treatment with cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapeutic regimens than in those that did respond (tumor size decreased) to such regimens. The therapeutic outcome of cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy corresponded to cellular ALDH1A1 levels in 77% of cases. The frequencies of false-positives (cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy not effective when a low level of ALDH1A1 predicted it would be) and false-negatives (cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy effective when a high level of ALDH1A1 predicted it would not be) were 0.00 and 0.43, respectively. Thus, partial or complete responses to cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy occurred 2.3 times more often when the ALDH1A1 level was low than when it was high. Given (1) the wide range of ALDH1A1 levels observed in malignant breast tissues, (2) that ALDH1A1 levels in primary breast tumor tissue, as well as those in normal breast tissue, directly reflect ALDH1A1 levels in metastatic breast tumor cells derived therefrom, and (3) the findings reported here, measurement of ALDH1A1 levels in primary breast malignancies and/or normal breast tissue prior to the initiation of chemotherapy is likely to be of value in predicting the therapeutic potential, or lack of potential, of cyclophosphamide and other oxazaphosphorines, e.g. ifosfamide, in the treatment of primary, as well as metastatic, breast cancer, thus providing a rational basis for the design of individualized therapeutic regimens for this disease. Failure to observe the expected inverse relationship between clinical responses to cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapeutic regimens and ALDH3A1 levels was probably because even the highest breast tumor tissue ALDH3A1 level thus far reported appears to be below the threshold level at which ALDH3A1-catalyzed detoxification of oxazaphosphorines becomes pharmacologically meaningful. However, ALDH3A1 levels in certain other malignancies, e.g. those of the alimentary tract and lung, may be of a sufficient magnitude in that regard.

Primary breast tumor levels of suspected molecular determinants of cellular sensitivity to cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and certain other anticancer agents as predictors of paired metastatic tumor levels of these determinants. Rational individualization of cancer chemotherapeutic regimens.

Cyclophosphamide is one of the most frequently used agents in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and high-dose chemotherapeutic treatment of breast cancers. Preclinical models indicate that cellular sensitivity to cyclophosphamide and other oxazaphosphorines, e.g., ifosfamide, is inversely related to the cellular content of two aldehyde dehydrogenases, viz ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1, and glutathione. Breast tumor levels of these "determinants of cellular sensitivity to the oxazaphosphorines" are known to vary widely, and the decision as to whether or not to use an oxazaphosphorine as part of the therapeutic strategy to treat breast cancer in any given patient is likely to depend, in large part, on the levels of these determinants in that cancer. ALDH1A1, ALDH3A1, and glutathione levels can be easily quantified in primary breast tumors and in detectable metastatic breast tumors present in axillary lymph nodes because the amounts of tissue required for the desired analysis can be readily obtained, whereas these levels cannot be quantified in residual metastatic breast cancer cell populations, i.e., those that escape detection and/or that are inaccessible to surgical harvest. The inability to directly quantify residual metastatic breast cancer cell ALDH1A1, ALDH3A1, and glutathione levels would not preclude a rational decision with regard to the inclusion/exclusion of an oxazaphosphorine as part of the chemotherapeutic strategy intended to eradicate residual metastatic breast cancer cells if primary breast tumor levels of these determinants reliably predicted those in metastatic breast cancer cells. ELISAs and spectrophotometric assays were used to quantify enzyme and glutathione levels in paired human primary and locally advanced metastatic breast tumor samples. Primary breast tumor ALDH1A1 and ALDH3A1 levels were highly predictive of their respective levels in paired metastatic breast tumors present in axillary lymph nodes (r2 = 0.80 and 0.85, respectively). On the other hand, those of glutathione were relatively poorly predictive of its levels in paired metastatic offshoots (r2 = 0.35). Primary breast tumor levels of some additional enzymes known to catalyze the detoxification/toxification of various anticancer agents, though not of cyclophosphamide, were poorly predictive (DT-diaphorase and glutathione S-transferases alpha, mu, and pi) or not predictive (cytochrome P450 1A1) of their respective levels in paired metastatic offshoots. Since ALDH1A1, ALDH3A1 and, to a lesser extent, glutathione levels in primary breast tumors reliably predicted those in detectable and easily accessible metastatic breast cancer cell populations, viz those in axillary lymph nodes, they are also likely to be predictive of these levels in undetectable and/or relatively inaccessible metastatic breast cancer cell populations. Thus, quantification of primary breast tumor ALDH1A1, ALDH3A1 and, to a lesser extent, glutathione levels prior to the initiation of not only neoadjuvant but also adjuvant and high-dose breast cancer chemotherapy is likely to be of value in the rational design of individualized chemotherapeutic regimens intended to eradicate breast cancer cells with a minimum of untoward effects.

Three different stable human breast adenocarcinoma sublines that overexpress ALDH3A1 and certain other enzymes, apparently as a consequence of constitutively upregulated gene transcription mediated by transactivated EpREs (electrophile responsive elements) present in the 5′-upstream regions of these genes

ALDH3A1 catalyzes the detoxification of cyclophosphamide, mafosfamide, 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide and other oxazaphosphorines. Constitutive ALDH3A1 levels, as well as those of certain other drug-metabolizing enzymes, e.g. NQO1 and CYP1A1, are relatively low in cultured, relatively oxazaphosphorine-sensitive, human breast adenocarcinoma MCF-7 cells. However, transient cellular insensitivity to the oxazaphosphorines can be brought about in these cells by transiently elevating ALDH3A1 levels in them as a consequence of transient exposure to: (1) electrophiles such as catechol that induce the transcription of a battery of genes, e.g. ALDH3A1 and NQO1, having in common an electrophile responsive element (EpRE) in their 5′-upstream regions; or (2) Ah-receptor agonists, e.g. indole-3-carbinol and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons such as 3-methylcholanthrene, that induce the transcription of a battery of genes, e.g. ALDH3A1, NQO1 and CYP1A1, having in common a xenobiotic responsive element (XRE) in their 5′-upstream regions. Further, MCF-7 sublines that are constitutively, i.e. when grown in the absence of the original selecting pressure, relatively oxazaphosphorine-insensitive as a consequence of constitutively relatively elevated cellular ALDH3A1 levels evolved when MCF-7 cells were: (1) continuously exposed for several months to gradually increasing concentrations of 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide or benz( a)pyrene; or (2) briefly exposed (once for 30 min) to a high concentration (1 mM) of mafosfamide. Each of these three stable sublines is constitutively relatively cross-insensitive to benz( a)pyrene and other polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Cellular levels of NQO1, but not of CYP1A1, are also constitutively relatively elevated in each of the three sublines. RT-PCR-based experiments established that ALDH3A1 mRNA levels are constitutively elevated (∼5- to 8-fold) in each of the three sublines. The elevated ALDH3A1 mRNA levels are not the consequence of gene amplification, hypomethylation of a relevant regulatory element, or ALDH3A1 mRNA stabilization. Collectively, these observations suggest that constitutively elevated levels of ALDH3A1 and certain other enzymes in the three stable sublines are probably the consequence of a constitutive change in the cellular concentration of a key component of the EpRE signaling pathway, such that the cellular concentration of the relevant ultimate transactivating factor is constitutively elevated, i.e. gene transcription promoted by transactivated EpREs is constitutively upregulated. Further, constitutively upregulated gene transcription mediated by transactivated EpREs can be relatively easily induced, whereas that mediated by transactivated XREs cannot, at least in MCF-7 cells. Still further, the three sublines may facilitate study of the signaling pathway that leads to transactivation of the EpREs present in the 5′-upstream regions of ALDH3A1, NQO1 and other gene loci.