Research Objectives 1. Determining if the InMotion2 Robot can be useful in alleviating unilateral spatial neglect 2. To understand if deficits with theoretical relationship can be addressed at the same time during the intervention (Muscle activation and Unilateral Spatial Neglect) 3. To determine the effect of early intervention to alleviate unilateral spatial neglect. Design Quasi-Experimental design with test - posttest. Setting Inpatient Rehabilitation. Participants A sample of convenience through consecutive sampling was used for this study and setting. The sample was derived from patients admitted to the Rehabilitation Institute due to a new onset of stroke, and exhibiting signs of unilateral spatial neglect, as determined by Albert's test, Star Cancellation and Catherine Bergego's Scale. 23 met the inclusion criteria. 16 completed the study with five in Robotic (treatment) group and eleven in control group. Interventions Both groups received conventional therapy, but the Robotic (treatment) group also received an extra 30 minutes of robotic training for ten days within the first two weeks of rehabilitation. The conventional therapy entailed training in activities of daily living, muscle activation and midline orientation. Robotic treatment entailed computer games with targets acquired through the interactive movement of robot with visual feed back. Main Outcome Measures Catherine Bergego's Scale, Functional Independence Measure, Star Cancellation, and Albert's Test. Results Results: positive outcomes in all tested domains but no statistically significant difference between the groups. Promote early intervention. Conclusions The results showed statistically significant outcomes in both groups (p < .05), both in the decrease of Unilateral Spatial Neglect and overall function. Overall, the results indicated that early intervention of unilateral spatial neglect can result in functional gains as evidenced by medium-large effect size in Functional Independence Measure; motor (Hedges’ g=0.6) and cognitive domains (Hedges’=0.8). The results had no statistically significant difference between groups (p < 05). The computer graphics of the treatment group indicated a general deviation towards the unaffected side on initial assessment but more midline oriented on final assessment. Author(s) Disclosures This is to certify that the author was not affiliated with the manufacturers of InMotion2 Robot and had no financial gains in relation to this study. 1. Determining if the InMotion2 Robot can be useful in alleviating unilateral spatial neglect 2. To understand if deficits with theoretical relationship can be addressed at the same time during the intervention (Muscle activation and Unilateral Spatial Neglect) 3. To determine the effect of early intervention to alleviate unilateral spatial neglect. Quasi-Experimental design with test - posttest. Inpatient Rehabilitation. A sample of convenience through consecutive sampling was used for this study and setting. The sample was derived from patients admitted to the Rehabilitation Institute due to a new onset of stroke, and exhibiting signs of unilateral spatial neglect, as determined by Albert's test, Star Cancellation and Catherine Bergego's Scale. 23 met the inclusion criteria. 16 completed the study with five in Robotic (treatment) group and eleven in control group. Both groups received conventional therapy, but the Robotic (treatment) group also received an extra 30 minutes of robotic training for ten days within the first two weeks of rehabilitation. The conventional therapy entailed training in activities of daily living, muscle activation and midline orientation. Robotic treatment entailed computer games with targets acquired through the interactive movement of robot with visual feed back. Catherine Bergego's Scale, Functional Independence Measure, Star Cancellation, and Albert's Test. Results: positive outcomes in all tested domains but no statistically significant difference between the groups. Promote early intervention. The results showed statistically significant outcomes in both groups (p < .05), both in the decrease of Unilateral Spatial Neglect and overall function. Overall, the results indicated that early intervention of unilateral spatial neglect can result in functional gains as evidenced by medium-large effect size in Functional Independence Measure; motor (Hedges’ g=0.6) and cognitive domains (Hedges’=0.8). The results had no statistically significant difference between groups (p < 05). The computer graphics of the treatment group indicated a general deviation towards the unaffected side on initial assessment but more midline oriented on final assessment.