AJCC 8th Research Articles

Validation of the AJCC 8th Edition Breast Cancer Prognostic Staging System in Legacy Alliance Trials (AFT-01).

The 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system combined anatomic stage (AS) with receptor status and grade to create prognostic stage (PS). PS has been validated in single-institution and cancer registry studies; however, missing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and variable treatment and follow-up create limitations. Our objective was to compare the relative prognostic ability of PS versus AS to predict survival using breast cancer clinical trial data. Women with non-metastatic breast cancer enrolled in six Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology trials were included (enrollment years 1997-2010). AS and PS were constructed using pathological tumor size, nodal status, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2 status, and grade. Unadjusted Cox proportional hazard models were estimated to predict overall survival within 5 years, with AS and PS as predictor variables. The relative predictive power of staging models was assessed by comparing Harrell concordance indices (C-indices). Kaplan-Meier-based mortality estimates were compared by stage. Overall, 6924 women were included (median age 53years); 45.2% were diagnosed with ER+/PR+/HER2- tumors, 26.2% with HER2+ tumors, and 17.1% with ER-/PR-/HER2- tumors. Median follow-up time was 5 years (interquartile range 2.95-5.00). PS significantly improved predictive performance (C-index 0.721) for overall survival compared with AS (0.700) (p=0.020). Kaplan-Meier hazard estimates suggested PS did not distinguish mortality risk between patients with IIB and IIIA or IB and IIA disease. PS has significantly improved predictive performance for OS compared with AS. As systemic therapies evolve, it will be important to re-evaluate the prognostic staging system, particularly for patients with intermediate-stage cancers. gov Identifier: NCT02171078.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with PD-1 inhibitor for laryngeal preservation in locally advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A single-arm, phase II clinical trial.

e18035 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) combination with PD-1 inhibitor has a significant efficacy and approved indications in the first-line treatment of R/M head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), but the efficacy of the combination therapy in locally advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPSCC) remains unexplored. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of NCT with PD-1 inhibitor for laryngeal preservation in patients with HPSCC. Methods: Patients with cT1N1-3M0 or cT2-3N0-3M0 (AJCC 8th) were eligible after multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussion. All patients received 2 cycles of intravenous docetaxel (60mg/m2 on d1), cisplatin (60mg/m2 on d1), fluorouracil (600mg/m2 per day as a continuous 120h infusion on d1-5) and toripalimab (240mg on d1) every 21 days. And the MDT underwent efficacy evaluation according to RECIST 1.1. Patients with complete response (CR)/partial response (PR) of the primary lesion(P) and no progressive disease (PD) in neck lymph nodes (LN) received definitive radiotherapy (RT) combined with toripalimab. Patients with stable disease (SD)/PD of P and no PD in LN or with PD in LN underwent surgery. Patients completed the third cycle of neoadjuvant therapy(NAT) before RT or surgery. The primary endpoint was the CR rate at 3 months (3m-CR) after NAT and definitive RT, and the secondary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR) of NAT, laryngeal preservation rate, and adverse effects(AE). The sample size was calculated by the Simon-II-stage method: 27 patients in first stage (if ≥9 patients got 3m-CR, second stage started) , and a cumulative total of 81 patients in second stage. Results: From October 2020 to August 2023, 23 patients (median age:59, range:51-69, male:100%, stage II/III/IVA/IVB:4.3%/4.3%/26.1%/65.2%) were enrolled. After NAT, the ORR of primary tumor was 78.3% (18/23, including 2 CR), the ORR of lymph node was 65.2%% (15/23, including 9 CR), and the overall ORR was 70.0% (16/23). Fifteen patients received non-surgical treatment after NAT, and 8 patients underwent surgery (6 underwent laryngeal preservation surgery). At 3 months after RT or surgery, 18 patients completed evaluation. The CR rate was 77.8%, and the laryngeal preservation rate was 88.9%. In 13 evaluable patients who received NAT followed by definitive RT, 10 patients (76.9%) had an overall response of 3m-CR. During the NAT, 43.5% (10/23) of patients experienced grade 3-4 AEs, with grade 3-4 leukopenia or neutropenia in 30.4% (7/23) and grade 3 immune enteritis in 13.0% (3/23). Conclusions: NCT combination with PD-1 inhibitor may improve the ORR of HPSCC, potentially further increasing the laryngeal preservation rate, with manageable treatment-related AEs. The study results are pending publication after completion of the enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT04624308 .

Intra-treatment hypoxia directed major radiation de-escalation as definitive treatment for human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal cancer.

6007 Background: We previously reported that surgery to the primary site with hypoxia-directed de-escalated radiation to the neck for human papillomavirus associated oropharyngeal carcinoma (HPV+ OPC) can lead to excellent oncologic outcomes. We now report the results of a successor multi-center phase II trial of hypoxia-directed de-escalated chemoradiotherapy without surgery for HPV+OPC. Methods: HPV+ OPC (T0-2/N1-N2c/AJCC 7th) patients were eligible for enrollment. Tumors without evidence of hypoxia on 18F-FMISO (fluoromisonidazole) PET received de-escalated chemoradiation to 30Gy while those with hypoxia received chemoradiation to 70Gy. The primary objective was achieving a 2-year locoregional control (LRC) of 95% (failure was locoregional recurrence where surgical salvage was unfeasible) with a 7% non-inferiority margin. We enrolled a total of 158 subjects upfront to account for a 5% loss due to death (of reasons other than cancer) or follow-up. Secondary objectives were local failure (LF), regional failure (RF), distant metastasis (DM), overall survival (OS), toxicities, and patient-reported MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) scores. LF, RF, and DM were estimated using the Cumulative Incidence Function, and OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results were reported up to 1/31/2024. Results: From 4/28/20-4/17/23, 158 HPV+ OPC patients were enrolled where150 patients were eligible for analyses. Patient characteristics: Tonsil (43%); Base of Tongue (47%); unknown primary (10%); >/=10 pack years (22%); T0 (9%), T1 (44%), T2 (47%); N1 (14%), N2a (11%), N2b (59%), N2c (16%). 111 (74%) received 30Gy; 95% cisplatin. With 24 months (8-43) of median follow-up, the 2-year LF, RF, DM rates were 4.2%, 6.9%, 2.0%, respectively. The 2-year overall survival probability was 99%. Only 2 patients could not undergo salvage surgery [one 30Gy (second recurrence); one 70Gy (M1)], both received systemic therapy with durable response. Acute grade 3-4 toxicities were 32% (67% neutropenia). Mean MDADI scores: 92.93 (baseline); 68.24 (3 weeks), 91.45 (4 months) after chemoradiation. Conclusions: These early data indicate that major de-escalation to 30Gy based on hypoxia status achieved significant toxicity reduction without compromise in survival for HPV+ OPC treated with chemoradiation without surgery. Clinical trial information: NCT03323463 .

EVOLVE-HNSCC: A global phase 3 study of volrustomig as sequential therapy for unresected locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) following definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT).

TPS6120 Background: Currently there are no approved maintenance therapies for patients (pts) with unresected LA-HNSCC following definitive cCRT. The PD-1 inhibitors pembrolizumab and nivolumab are licensed for treatment of pts with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC who have progressed on or after a platinum-based therapy. Dual inhibition of CTLA-4 and PD-L1 is approved in solid tumors including renal cell carcinoma (RCC), NSCLC, and melanoma, and has shown a numerical trend towards improved survival in first-line pts with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC whose tumors express PD-L1. Volrustomig (MEDI5752) is a monovalent, PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific, humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody engineered to specifically inhibit PD-1, with increased CTLA-4 blockade on PD-1+ activated T cells compared to PD-1– resting peripheral T cells. In a first-in-human phase 1/2 study (NCT03530397), volrustomig monotherapy showed promising efficacy with acceptable tolerability in advanced clear cell RCC and in combination with chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC. The phase 3, randomized, open-label, multicenter, eVOLVE-HNSCC study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of sequential therapy with volrustomig compared with observation in pts with unresected LA-HNSCC who have not progressed after receiving definitive cCRT (NCT06129864). Methods: Key eligibility criteria include histologically or cytologically confirmed, unresected LA-HNSCC with no evidence of metastatic disease, i.e. AJCC 8th edition (TNM staging system) stage IVA/B cancers of the hypopharynx, oral cavity, larynx or HPV-negative oropharynx, or stage III HPV-positive oropharynx cancer; age ≥18 years; WHO/ECOG performance score of 0 or 1; and adequate organ and bone marrow function. Key exclusion criteria include requiring further treatment with curative intent after definitive cCRT, resected LA-HNSCC, recurrent/metastatic disease, and >1 primary tumor. Following initial screening and definitive cCRT (cisplatin or carboplatin + paclitaxel or carboplatin + 5-FU, plus concomitant radiotherapy), approximately 1145 pts whose disease has not progressed within 12 weeks of the last dose of cCRT will be randomized 1:1 to Arm A or B. Arm A will receive volrustomig intravenously every 3 weeks for a maximum of 12 months or 18 cycles, or until RECIST v1.1-defined radiological progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Arm B will undergo observation for a maximum of 12 months or until PD. The primary endpoint is PFS in pts with PD-L1-expressing tumors. Secondary endpoints include PFS in all randomized pts, OS in pts with PD-L1-expressing tumors and in all randomized pts, PFS2, safety, patient-reported outcomes, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. Exploratory biomarker analyses will also be conducted. Enrollment began in December 2023. Clinical trial information: NCT06129864 .

Role of magnetic resonance imaging in staging of rectal cancer and application AJCC 8th staging

Purpose: To evaluate the role of MRI in staging of rectal cancer according to AJCC 8th staging. Material and Methods: A cross sectional study with 31 histiologically proven rectal cancer patients treated at Hue Central Hospital from 01/2022 to 05/2023. Results: The accuracy of MRI in diagnosing stage T rectal cancer according to the AJCC 8th staging is 93.5% with Kappa coefficient = 0.866. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of each stage were T1-T2: 75%, 100%, 75%; T3: 100%, 81,8%, 90,9%; T4: 100%, 100%, 100%. About 12.9% of patients invaded the mesorectal fascia (MRF +) on MRI. There was only 1 case of EMVI+. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MRI in dectecting lymph node metastasis was 80%, 66,7%,71%. Conclusion: MRI appears to be a highly accurate modality so when application AJCC 8th staging be can preoperative staging and decision-making treatment of rectal cancer Key words: magnetic resonance imaging, AJCC 8th staging, rectal cancer.

Role of dynamic ctDNA monitoring in cervical and anal epidermoid carcinomas under curative chemoradiation.

3141 Background: Cervical and anal canal squamous cell carcinoma (SSC) are a significant health problem in underdevelopment countries. Definitive chemoradiation (CRT) is the standard-of-care (SOC) approach for curative treatment in locally advanced disease. Due to the common substantial local inflammation during CRT, the conventional clinical image cannot identify non-responders early. In this scenario, the evaluation of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising tool for real-time tumor response monitoring. Methods: We performed a prospective multicentric cohort study of patients treated between 2020 and 2023 in tertiary oncologic centers in Brazil to evaluate the role of ctDNA dynamic monitoring in epidermoid cervical (CC) and anal cancer (AC) T1-4, N0-1, M0 by AJCC 8th edition and candidates to complete curative CRT. The cDNA was assessed by Signatera test at D1, D29, immediately post-treatment, 8 weeks (w) post-CRT, 24w post-CRT, every 6 months (m) in the first 1-2 years(y), and yearly at 3-5y of follow-up (FUP). The primary endpoint was to estimate the correlation of ctDNA with a tumoral response assessed by conventional routine image and clinical evaluation at 8w. Secondary endpoints included a correlation between ctDNA results at different time points with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The predictive potential of the biomarker was evaluated using receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: We included 33 patients, and 27 were evaluable with ctDNA, with a median FUP of 10m. The majority were female (n=23, 85.1%), and 3 (11%) were HIV-positive(+). Most patients presented with positive nodes and stage III disease (n=18, 66.6%). In the AC group (n=15), the majority received CRT with capecitabine and cisplatin (n=12, 55.5%); in the CC group (n=12), all pts received cisplatin. All pts tested expressed ctDNA+ before treatment. At 8w, images had a sensitivity of 42.8% and specificity of 100% for disease progression (area under the curve [AUC] 0.714), while ctDNA yielded a sensitivity of 85.7% and specificity of 89.4% (AUC 0.875). The ctDNA+ immediately after CRT ended (32%) was consistent with ctDNA+ at 8w (30.7%) and 24w (30%). Pts with ctDNA+ immediately post CRT have a higher risk of disease progression with PFS of 8.2m in ctDNA+ and not reached in ctDNA- group (HR:17.5; IC95%:1.9-157.3; p=0.01). Data are immature for OS analysis. Conclusions: CtDNA immediately post-CRT has a high predictive value in patients with anal and cervical tumors in early access CRT non-responders, who are at a high risk of disease progression. This biomarker should be considered for tailoring strategies of treatment escalation in this population.

Analysis of neoadjuvant nivolumab and ipilimumab for clinical stage III melanoma using the SWOG S1801 event-free survival definition.

e21563 Background: Perioperative pembrolizumab to advanced melanoma, as shown SWOG S1801 trial, was associated with a longer event-free survival (EFS) than those who received adjuvant pembrolizumab (EFS at 2y: 72% vs 49%, respectively). EFS, as defined in this trial, encompasses important factors related to neoadjuvant therapy in clinical practice. So far, there is no data of EFS rate for melanoma patients(pts.) treated with neoadjuvant nivolumab and ipilimumab, which is associated with more response rate but also more toxicity. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of pts. with clinical stage III melanoma treated with neoadjuvant nivolumab 3mg/kg + ipilimumab 1 mg/kg (N3+I1) for two cycles followed by surgery and adjuvant therapy at AC Camargo Cancer Center. We applied the SWOG S1801 EFS definition (which includes inability to receive surgery, to start adjuvant therapy, melanoma recurrence and death) to this cohort. Results: Between Jan 2019 and Jan 2024, 37 pts. with clinical stage III melanoma treated with neoadjuvant N3+I1 were identified. Gender: 25 males (67%), median age (years): 58 (range: 31-78), BRAFV600 mut: 25(67%), Stage AJCC 8th edition: IIIB = 23 (62%), IIIC = 12 (32%), IIID = 2(6%). G3/G4 immune-related adverse events (irAE): 11 patients (30%). Two out 37 pts. did not complete the programmed neoadjuvant cycles due to toxicity (1 = colitis, 1 = myositis). Three pts. (8%) were unable to receive surgery: irAE = 1, metastatic disease = 2. All pts. who underwent surgery (n = 35) achieved R0 resection and started adjuvant therapy within 84-days after the procedure. Major pathological response (MPR) = 23 pts(66%) and non-MPR = 12 pts.(34%). There were 4 melanoma relapses after starting adjuvant therapy (11%). The total number of events was 7 (19%). In a median follow-up of 16.1 months(range:13.9-25), the landmark analysis of EFS at 2 years was 73% (95%CI, 49 to 87). Relapse-free survival(RFS) for MPR at 2 years: 96%. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant N3+I1 seems to have similar EFS compared to SWOG S1801, but numerically more MPR rate and fewer events of progression, relapse and/or death. [Table: see text]

Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) in patients with locoregional prostate cancer (LPC) treated with prior androgen deprivation therapy (ADT): A single center review.

e24045 Background: In LPC, ADT may be combined with radiation therapy (RT) for 4-24 months. Post-ADT, a significant proportion of men experience prolonged hypogonadism. TRT can alleviate symptoms and improve metabolic outcomes. Contrary to longstanding concerns, there is no substantial evidence of increased prostate cancer recurrence in patients (pts) treated with single modalities (surgery or RT). However, sparse data ( < 100 cases published to our knowledge) exist regarding recurrence risk of LPC with TRT after prior ADT, where baseline T levels may fall below the androgen receptor saturation point. Methods: We retrospectively abstracted clinical data from hospital records of men with stage I – IVA PC, treated with prior concurrent ADT and RT and subsequently received TRT between January 2014 and September 2023. Extracted data included demographics, cancer diagnosis/staging, ADT/TRT treatment details and PSA and clinical outcomes. The co-primary endpoints were change in PSA and incidence of PC recurrence. Results: 21 pts met criteria. Median age was 77. ISUP Grade Groups (GG) included: GG1: 2, GG2: 2, GG3: 8, GG4: 2, and GG5: 7. AJCC 8th ed. stages were: I: 2, II: 7, III: 7, IV-A: 5. The median duration of prior ADT was 8 months (IQR 5 – 17) and the median interval from RT to TRT was 19 months (IQR: 12 – 44). Prior to TRT, the median testosterone level was 30.5 ng/dL (IQR: 17-76). TRT formulations included: injection: 6, oral: 4, topical: 13. The median follow-up period from the start of TRT was 13 months, and the median duration on TRT was 10 months (IQR: 5-22). TRT was ongoing in 15 (71.4%) pts and discontinued in 6 (28.6%). Reasons for discontinuation included testosterone recovery (1), hospice (not PC related) (2), no perceived benefit (2), MD concern for PSA rise (1). After TRT, the median testosterone level was 336 ng/dL (IQR: 207-462). Median PSA pre- and post-TRT were undetectable and 0.08 ng/dL, respectively. None of the subjects experienced PC recurrence or PC-specific mortality. One pt showed PSA bounce without recurrence. Median BMI was unchanged before (28.3 kg/m2) and after (27.7 kg/m2) TRT (p = 0.48). Due to the nature of the study, quality of life measures and metabolic parameters could not be systematically abstracted. Conclusions: In men with LPC who remained hypogonadal long-term after prior ADT and RT, we found that TRT was not associated with a significant rise in median PSA and no cases of PC recurrence were documented. This included many with a history of very high-risk cancers (eg. GG ≥ 4, Stage ≥ III). This study adds to the sparse existing literature in this clinical setting and together they support the case for a prospective trial utilizing TRT in patients who remain hypogonadal after ADT and radiation.

INTerpath-001: Pembrolizumab with V940 (mRNA-4157) versus pembrolizumab with placebo for adjuvant treatment of high-risk stage II-IV melanoma.

TPS9616 Background: The anti−PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab is approved as adjuvant therapy for stage IIB-C and stage III melanoma by AJCC 8th ed, following complete resection. Adjuvant pembrolizumab has improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in patients with high-risk melanoma, but many patients experience disease recurrence. In the randomized phase 2b KEYNOTE-942 study, the individualized neoantigen therapy V940 showed improved RFS and DMFS when used in combination with pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with stage III or IV melanoma. INTerpath-001 (NCT05933577) is a double-blind phase 3 randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant pembrolizumab plus V940 versus pembrolizumab plus placebo in patients with resected high-risk stage II-IV melanoma. Methods: Eligible patients are aged ≥18 years with surgically resected stage IIB or IIC (pathologic or clinical), III, or IV cutaneous melanoma per AJCC 8th ed and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients are ineligible if they have received any prior systemic therapy and if more than 13 weeks has elapsed between last surgical resection and first dose of pembrolizumab. Patients with ocular or mucosal melanoma and past or current in-transit metastases or satellitosis are excluded. All patients must provide a blood sample and a formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor sample for sequencing. Patients will be stratified by risk (IIB, IIC, IIIA, and IIIB vs IIIC/D and IV) and age (<65 years vs ≥65 years). Approximately 1089 patients will be randomly assigned 2:1 to receive pembrolizumab 400 mg plus V940 1 mg or pembrolizumab 400 mg with placebo. Pembrolizumab will be administered intravenously every 6 weeks and v940 or placebo will be administered intramuscularly every 3 weeks. Treatment will continue for up to 9 doses or until disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity, or patient withdrawal. The primary end point is RFS by investigator review. Secondary end points are DMFS by investigator review, overall survival, safety and tolerability, and quality of life. Hazard ratios and 95% CIs will be estimated using a stratified Cox regression model with the Efron method of handling ties. Between-treatment differences will be evaluated using a stratified log-rank test. Enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05933577 .

Epidemiological investigation of neuroendocrine differentiation in carcinomas: Focus on pancreatic and cholangiocarcinoma cohorts.

e16375 Background: Neuroendocrine differentiated (NED) occurs in various non-neuroendocrine organs and is associated with unique clinical profiles, disease progression, and poorer prognosis. However, global research on NED is scarce. To address this, our study utilized standardized detection methods to explore NED's prevalence in several solid tumors. This research aims to clarify NED pathological characteristics and prognostic significance, enhancing diagnostic and treatment approaches in clinical practice. Methods: Patients (18-75 years) with cancers including pancreatic, cholangiocarcinoma, gastric, colorectal, lung, breast, and prostate, were analyzed post-surgery at our hospital (January 2017- June 2018). Criteria for inclusion were normal organ function and no pre-surgery neoadjuvant therapy. Tumors were staged postoperatively using AJCC 8th criteria (stages I-III), followed by standard adjuvant chemotherapy. NED markers like Chromogranin A, Synaptophysin, and CD56 were detected in tumors via immunohistochemical staining. Results: Between January 2017 and June 2018, over 450 cases were enrolled. Initial analysis included 46 pancreatic cancer and 49 cholangiocarcinoma samples. NED markers were found in 11 (23.9%) of the pancreatic cancer patients, comprising 5 Syno (+), 10 ChrA (+), and 1 CD56 (+) cases. In cholangiocarcinoma patients, 12 (24.5%) expressed NED markers, including 4 Syno (+) and 11 ChrA (+) cases. Conclusions: This study reveals a significant occurrence of neuroendocrine differentiation in pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma. The notable prevalence of NED underscores its potential as a reference for tailoring clinical treatments. The association between NED and patient prognosis warrants further investigation.

Outcomes with perioperative durvalumab (D) in pts with resectable NSCLC and baseline N2 lymph node involvement (N2 R-NSCLC): An exploratory subgroup analysis of AEGEAN.

8011 Background: In the phase 3 AEGEAN study (NCT03800134), perioperative D + neoadj chemotherapy (CT) vs neoadj CT alone significantly improved the primary EPs of event-free survival (EFS) and pathological complete response (pCR; absence of residual viable tumor [RVT] in resection specimen, incl. primary tumor and sampled lymph nodes) with manageable safety in pts with R-NSCLC (modified ITT [mITT] population). Here, we report exploratory analyses of pts in AEGEAN with baseline N2 nodal status. Methods: Pts with Tx-naïve R-NSCLC (stage II–IIIB[N2]; AJCC 8th ed) were randomized (1:1) to 4 cycles of platinum-based CT plus D 1500 mg IV or placebo (PBO) Q3W before surgery (Sx), followed by D or PBO (Q4W, 12 cycles) after Sx. The mITT population excluded pts with known EGFR/ ALK alterations. Efficacy was assessed in an mITT subpopulation with baseline N2 nodal status (per investigator). Safety was assessed in all N2 R-NSCLC pts who had ≥1 Tx dose. Results: Of 740 pts in the mITT population, 366 (49.5%) had baseline N2 nodal status (D, n = 181; PBO, n = 185). In the N2 subgroup, 83.4% in the D arm and 84.9% in the PBO arm completed 4 cycles of platinum-doublet CT; 77.9% and 77.8%, respectively, had Sx; and 73.5% and 71.9% completed Sx. In the N2 subgroup, similar to the overall mITT population, EFS was prolonged in the D vs PBO arm (HR, 0.63 [95% CI: 0.43–0.90]); rates of pCR (16.6% vs 4.9%; difference, 11.7% [95% CI: 5.6–18.4]) and major pathological response (MPR, ≤10% RVT in primary tumor; 32.6% vs 15.1%; difference, 17.5% [95% CI: 8.8–26.0]) were higher in the D vs PBO arm. While EFS benefit in the D vs PBO arm was similar among pts with single- (HR, 0.61 [95% CI: 0.39–0.94]) or multi-station N2 (HR, 0.69 [95% CI: 0.33–1.38]), pCR benefit was less pronounced in multi-station pts (difference in pCR rate, 13.9% [95% CI: 6.6–21.7] for single-station N2 vs 3.8% [95% CI: –9.2–18.8] for multi-station N2). Among pts in the N2 subgroup who had Sx, similar proportions in the D and PBO arms had open (47.5% vs 50.0%) and minimally invasive procedures (50.4% vs 46.5%); 9.2% vs 11.1% had pneumonectomy (9.2% vs 9.6% in the overall mITT population). Of pts in the N2 subgroup who completed Sx, the proportion with R0 resection in the D vs PBO arm (94.7% vs 91.7%) was similar to that in the overall mITT population. Sx was delayed in a similar proportion who had Sx in the D vs PBO arm (19.9% vs 23.6%, respectively), most commonly for logistical reasons (e.g., scheduling issues). Among 394 pts who received Tx (N2 safety analysis subset; D, n = 200; PBO, n = 194), max grade 3/4 any-cause AEs occurred in 38.5% vs 41.8% in the D and PBO arm, respectively, similar to rates in the overall safety analysis set. Conclusions: With clinically meaningful improvement in efficacy, no adverse impact on Sx outcomes and a manageable safety profile, the addition of perioperative D to neoadj CT remains a potential new Tx option for pts with N2 R-NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT03800134 .

VELOCITY-Lung substudy-03: A phase 2 study of neoadjuvant domvanalimab (dom)+zimberelimab (zim)+chemotherapy (chemo) or zim+chemo followed by adjuvant dom+zim or zim in patients with resectable stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

TPS8121 Background: Management of resectable NSCLC involves surgery with perioperative systemic therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) and targeted therapies are now used in the perioperative setting, leading to improved survival outcomes. The combination of dom (anti–T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain [TIGIT]) and zim (anti–programmed death protein 1 [PD-1]) has shown promising antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile in metastatic NSCLC and may provide an opportunity to improve clinical outcomes in the perioperative setting in early-stage, resectable NSCLC. Substudy-03 of the VELOCITY-Lung platform study is evaluating novel perioperative treatment combinations in patients with newly diagnosed, resectable, stage II-III NSCLC. Methods: VELOCITY-Lung (NCT05633667) is an open-label, multicenter, phase 2 platform study with 3 ongoing substudies targeting the different NSCLC patient populations. Key eligibility criteria for Substudy-03 include age ≥ 18 years, histologically/cytologically confirmed stage II, IIIA, IIIB (T[3-4]N2) (per AJCC 8th ed.) squamous or nonsquamous NSCLC considered resectable with curative intent, no prior systemic or CPI therapy or radiotherapy, ECOG PS 0-1, any PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) status, and no actionable EGFR or ALK genomic alterations in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC. Randomization in Substudy-03 will be stratified by disease stage (II vs III) and baseline PD-L1 expression status (≥ 50% vs < 50%). Current treatment groups in the neoadjuvant phase of the preliminary stage are: (A) dom+zim+platinum (Pt)-based chemo or (B) zim+Pt-based chemo for a maximum of 3 cycles; this will be followed by definitive surgery within 6 weeks of completing neoadjuvant treatment. Adjuvant treatment will include: (A) dom+zim or (B) zim and will begin within 12 weeks of surgery. Patients will continue to receive adjuvant treatment until disease recurrence, death, or unacceptable toxicity or to a maximum of 14 cycles. Dosing will be as follows: zim 360 mg intravenously (IV) once every 3 weeks (Q3W) and dom 1200 mg IV once Q3W (up to 3 cycles in the neoadjuvant phase and up to 14 cycles in the adjuvant phase). Pt-based chemo will be based on patient tumor histology (squamous vs nonsquamous). The primary endpoint is pathological complete response rate, defined as the percentage of patients with no residual invasive cancer in resected lung specimens and lymph nodes, assessed by local pathology review. Secondary endpoints include major pathological response rate (percentage of patients with ≤ 10% residual tumor in lung and lymph nodes at surgery), event-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Approximately 31 patients will be enrolled into each treatment group of the preliminary phase. The study is currently recruiting. Clinical trial information: NCT05633667 .

Combined EORTC FDG-PET/CT and RECIST 1.1 response criteria and prediction of pathological response to neoadjuvant nivolumab and ipilimumab for clinical stage III melanoma.

9590 Background: Accurate identification of pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy for clinical stage III melanoma before surgery may allow us to better tailor the treatment. RECIST 1.1 has shown poor concordance rates with pathological responses and EORTC FDG-PET/CT response criteria using SUV max is susceptible to internal and external variables leading to difficulty in determining accuracy appropriately. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with clinical stage III melanoma treated with neoadjuvant nivolumab 3mg/kg + ipilimumab 1mg/kg(N3+I1) for two cycles who did baseline and pre-operative 18F-FDG-PET/CT. RECIST 1.1 and EORTC PETCT criteria were used to classify patients in terms of response. The pathological results were correlated to the image findings. Results: Between Jan 2019 and Jan 2024, 37 patients with clinical stage III melanoma treated with neoadjuvant N3+I1 were identified. Gender: 25 males (67%), median age (years): 58 (range: 31-78), BRAFV600 mut: 25(67%), positive nodes on baseline exam:1=30 (81%), 2=4(11%), and 3 or more =3(8%). Stage AJCC 8th edition: IIIB=23 (62%), IIIC=12 (32%), IIID=2(6%). Among them, 34 had baseline and post-neoadjuvant therapy PET-CT. Twenty-one (62%) had major pathological response (MPR) and 13(38%) had non-MPR. Using objective response and non-objective criteria to capture MPR and non-MPR, respectively, we found the following results: RECIST 1.1 (sensitivity= 48%, specificity=100%, accuracy=68%), EORTC-PET (sensitivity=90%, specificity=69%, accuracy=82%). Combining RECIST 1.1 and EORTC-PET/CT analysis, we found that: double objective responders (CR/PR and CMR/PMR, n=10) had 100% specificity to MPR and double progressors (PD/PMD, n=9) had 95% specificity to non-MPR. The only patient classified as double progressor that did not have non-MPR presented an intense inflammatory response with fever, pain and erythema leading to an increase in the size and number of lymph-nodes. No viable cells were found in the pathological report. Conclusions: Using combined RECIST 1.1 and EORTC-PET/CT response criteria may help to predict pathological response in patients with clinical stage III melanoma who undergo to neoadjuvant nivolumab and ipilimumab.

An open-label, single-center phase II trial of cadonilimab (an anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody) in combination with platinum-based dual-drug neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced, resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

6044 Background: Consensus on neoadjuvant treatment strategies for resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is not proposed currently. Preclinical and clinical findings suggested that PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibodies may have synergistic anti-tumor activity. This study aimed to explore the safety and activity of cadonilimab in combination with platinum-based dual-drug neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced, resectable HNSCC. Methods: In this open-label phase II trial, eligible patients with untreated locally advanced, resectable HNSCC (T2N2-3M0、T3-4N0-3M0; stage III-IV, AJCC 8th Edition) were enrolled to receive cadonilimab (10 mg/kg) and platinum-based dual-drug [docetaxel (75 mg/m2) plus cisplatin (60 mg/m2)] on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for three cycles, followed by surgery and postoperative adjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST1.1. Secondary endpoints included pathologic complete response (pCR), safety, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Between July 2023 and December 2023, 24 patients were enrolled (median age, 55 years [range 34–69]; 21 men [87.5%]), tumors were located in the oral cavity (10/24, 41.7%), hypopharynx (8/24, 33.3%) and larynx (6/24, 25.0%), 20 (83.3%) patients were clinical T3/4 while 10 patients (41.7%) ≥N2 . After completion of neoadjuvant therapy, the ORR was 87.5% (21/24). Of the 24 patients, 12 (50.0%) patients reached pCR. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 14 (58.3%) patients. Grade 3-4 TRAEs were reported in 4 (16.7%) patients, including rash (12.5%), pruritus (12.5%) and Guillain-Barre syndrome (4.2%). DFS and OS data were not yet mature as of the cutoff date (January 1,2024). Conclusions: Cadonilimab plus platinum-based dual-drug neoadjuvant chemotherapy achieved favorable ORR and pCR with manageable toxicities in patients with HNSCC. Follow-up is still underway to obtain long-term survival data. Clinical trial information: NCT06023875 .

Significance of imaging-detected extranodal extension (iENE) in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LASCCHN) treated with induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy.

6034 Background: Extranodal extension (ENE) of nodal metastasis is a significant prognostic factor in p16-negative SCCHN and is classified as N3b by the AJCC 8th edition. Therefore, pretreatment determination of ENE has significant clinical implications in SCCHN, and iENE has just recently been proposed. We previously discussed association with pathological ENE and iENE (Jpn J Radiol. 2020;38(6):489-506.). However, the role of iENE in non-surgical sequential therapy remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with LASCCHN originating from the oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx who received enhanced computed tomography (CT), then treated with induction chemotherapy (IC) with paclitaxel, carboplatin, and cetuximab followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) from 2013 to 2022 in our hospital. Two radiologists specializing in head and neck cancer blindly annotated the status of iENE in baseline CT images by the previously reported criteria (Oral Oncol. 2022;125:105716.). Multivariate analysis variables for event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) included the presence or absence of iENE, a response to IC, clinical T-category, performance status, smoking status, etc. Results: In the 88 patients, 67 (76.1%) had iENE and 21 (23.9%) did not at baseline. In the former and latter group, stage II/III/IV were 10.4%/26.9%/62.7% and 0%/28.6%/71.4%, HPV-positive were 37.3% and 28.6%, respectively. With the median follow-up of 37.4 months (range: 6.7-108.8), the former had significantly shorter EFS (3-y EFS: 41.9% vs. 75.6%, hazard ratio [HR]; 2.9 (1.2-7.4), p-value; 0.02) and OS (3-y OS: 72.8% vs. 100%, HR; Inf (0.01-Inf), p-value=0.003). Multivariate analysis identified the presence of iENE (HR for EFS: 2.80, 95%CI: 0.97-8.05, HR for OS: 2.93, 95%CI: 1.01-8.44) and unresponsiveness to IC (HR for EFS: 2.47, 95%CI: 1.31-4.68, HR for OS: 2.87, 95%CI: 1.13-7.26) as mutually independent unfavorable prognostic factors for both EFS and OS. Furthermore, classification based on the two factors could identify the population with a worse prognosis (Table). Conclusions: In the sequential therapy of IC followed by CRT, the current study revealed for the first time that subjects with an iENE at baseline, together with an unsatisfactory response to IC would require special attention, such as more intensified post-treatment follow-up as well as additional therapeutic interventions to improve their prognosis. [Table: see text]

Clinical significance of supraclavicular lymph node (SCLN) dissection for patients with breast cancer with ipsilateral SCLN metastasis.

e13110 Background: Breast cancer with ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node (SCLN) metastasis is defined as Ⅲc stage according to the 8th AJCC system. It is still pending whether to exert SCLN dissection except for regional radiotherapy to such patients. Methods: Breast cancer patients with ipsilateral SCLN metastasis from 2019.02 to 2024.01 in multiple centers in Hubei China, were enrolled. Patients received either SCLN radiotherapy alone or combined with SCLN dissection. All patients received standard therapy recommended by the NCCN guidelines. The primary endpoint was 5-year disease free survival (DFS), and secondary endpoints were complication rates, overall survival (OS), and quality of life scores. Results: As of 2024.01, a total of 181 patients with a median age of 51 years (28-78 years) were enrolled. 177 patients received neoadjuvant therapy and 4 patients underwent surgery followed by adjuvant therapy. The molecular subtyping composition was Luminal (HR+, HER2-, 38%), TNBC (triple negative breast cancer, HR-, HER2-, 23%), HER2+ (HR-, HER2+, 20%) and TPBC (triple positive breast cancer, HR+, HER2+, 19%). Of the 177 neoadjuvant treated-patients, 71.2% did not achieve pathological complete response (pCR). The percentage of molecular subtyping in non-pCR neoadjuvant patients was Luminal 45%, TNBC 26%, HER2+ 15%, and TPBC 14%, while those who got pCR were HER2+ 35%, TPBC 31%, Luminal 18%, and TNBC 16%. A total of 27 recurrent and/or metastatic events occurred, with 14.5% (8/55) in the experimental group (with SCLN dissection) and 15.1% (19/126) in the control group; while Luminal accounted for 13.4% (9/67), TPBC 13.9% (5/36), HER2+ 16.2% (6/37) and TNBC 17.1% (7/41). Using questionnaires, we found that both groups resulted in comparable complication rates, and quality of life scores were better in the group that did not undergo SCLN dissection. Conclusions: According to the preliminary results, we found several interesting phenomena. First, patients with SCLN metastasis had a higher percentage of HER2 overexpression, including HER2+ and TPBC, up to 39%. Second, receiving neoadjuvant therapy, TPBC and HER2+ subtypes were more likely to achieve pCR, possibly due to the use of dual-targeted agents. Third, even the median follow-up time has not yet been reached, preliminary data suggested that the recurrent and metastatic rates were comparable in both groups and four subtypes. These data seem to suggest that in patients with ipsilateral SCLN metastasis, SCLN dissection is not mandatory with effective systematic therapy and radiotherapy. In addition, for Luminal subtype, adjuvant therapy should not be taken lightly, while for HER2 overexpressing and TNBC subtypes, the necessity of intensive therapy is no longer purposely highlighted. Of course, we also look forward to the final statistical analysis of the differences in the primary endpoints to bring us a better answer. Clinical trial information: NCT03716245 .

Molecular residual disease (MRD) analysis from the ADAURA trial of adjuvant (adj) osimertinib in patients (pts) with resected EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) stage IB–IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

8005 Background: Osimertinib (osi) is a third-generation, central nervous system-active EGFR-TKI, that potently and selectively inhibits EGFR-TKI sensitizing and EGFR T790M resistance mutations. Adj osi (3 years [yrs]) is recommended for resected EGFRm stage IB–IIIA NSCLC, based on significant improvements in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the Phase III ADAURA study (NCT02511106). A trend towards an increased DFS event rate beyond 3 yrs suggests some pts may benefit from longer adj osi treatment (tx). We explored if plasma ctDNA-based, tumor-informed MRD could predict disease recurrence. Methods: Eligible pts (≥18 yrs [≥20 in Japan/Taiwan], WHO PS 0/1 with completely resected EGFRm [Ex19del/L858R] stage IB, II or IIIA [AJCC 7th edition] NSCLC) were randomized 1:1 to osi 80 mg once daily or placebo (pbo) until disease recurrence, tx completion (up to 3 yrs), or a discontinuation criterion was met. Personalized MRD panels (RaDaR, NeoGenomics) were used, comprised of ≤50 tumor-specific variants, based on whole exome sequencing of resected tumor tissue (variants identified in germline DNA removed). Plasma sample collection: baseline (BL; at randomization surgery and adj Ctx, if received), on tx (every 12 weeks [wks]), tx discontinuation, and post-tx completion (wk 12, wk 24, then every 24 wks until 5 yrs). Plasma samples were analyzed for detection of ctDNA (MRD+). Molecular recurrence or DFS (MRD/DFS) was defined as time from randomization to post-BL MRD+, disease recurrence, or death and was compared across arms. DFS was investigator-assessed. Results: Of 682 pts randomized, 245 (36%) had samples required to produce MRD panels, which were evaluable for 220 (32%) pts across both arms. In the osi vs pbo arms, 5/112 (4%) vs 13/108 (12%) pts were MRD+ at BL; 4/5 pts became MRD– during osi tx vs 0/13 pts on pbo. On tx, MRD detection had clinical sensitivity of 65% (62 MRD+/96 DFS+), specificity of 95% (118 MRD–/124 DFS–) and preceded a DFS event by a median (95% CI) of 4.7 (2.2, 5.6) months (mos) across both arms. Median follow-up time from randomization was 44.2 (95% CI 42.4, 49.1) and 19.1 (95% CI 11.1, 28.3) mos for osi and pbo arms, respectively. Overall, 86% (95% CI 78, 92) vs 36% (95% CI 27, 45) pts in the osi vs pbo arms were MRD/DFS event free at 36 mos (HR: 0.23; 95% CI 0.15, 0.36). MRD/DFS events in the osi arm were detected at any time post-BL in 28 (25%) pts, of whom 19/28 (68%) had events post-adj osi. Most (11/19 [58%]) MRD/DFS events detected occurred within 12 mos of osi tx completion. Conclusions: MRD+ preceded DFS events in most pts with a median lead time of 4.7 mos across both arms. MRD– was maintained for most pts during adj osi tx with the majority of MRD/DFS events occurring after osi tx completion. MRD detection could potentially identify a subset of pts likely to benefit from longer adj osi. Clinical trial information: NCT02511106 .

Reconsidering S100B: Why it is time to abandon its use in detecting disease recurrence in stage III melanoma patients

BackgroundEspecially in the era of successful systemic therapy, there is an urgent need to detect early disease recurrence in stage III melanoma patients. This study investigates if serum S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B) can detect disease recurrence in stage III melanoma patients. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted at the University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG). Adult AJCC 8th stage III melanoma patients in whom serum S100B was measured as part of follow-up from January 2010 until April 2023 were included. The association between serum S100B and disease recurrence was evaluated using standard definitions for sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV). ResultsOverall, 147 patients were included (mean age was 60.4 years, 53.1 % were female). Most patients were classified as stage IIIB (39, 26.5 %) and IIIC (73, 49.7 %). During median follow-up of 56 months, 69 (46.9 %) patients experienced disease recurrence. Seventeen out of 18 patients with elevated serum S100B (≥0.15 μg/L) experienced disease recurrence (PPV of 94.4 %). However, 52 out of 69 patients with disease recurrence had normal serum S100B (sensitivity of 24.6 %). Eight out of 17 (47.1 %) patients were asymptomatic (P = 0.608), twelve (70.6 %) patients had at least four distant metastases (P < 0.001). ConclusionThe clinical value of serum S100B to detect disease recurrence in stage III melanoma patients is negligible since only one out of four patients with disease recurrence have elevated serum S100B. Furthermore, half of stage III melanoma patients with elevated S100B experienced symptoms, and most patients already have multiple distant metastases.

The 8th AJCC classification is inferior to a new neck stage based on intraparotid lymph node in parotid gland cancer

BackgroundLymph node (LN) status is an important prognostic factor for parotid gland cancer (PGC). This study aimed to analyze the impact of extranodal extension (ENE) of intraparotid LN and LN metastasis burden on survival in PGC.MethodsPatients with surgically treated PGC and at least one metastatic cervical LN were retrospectively enrolled. Primary outcome variables were distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS). The impact of ENE and LN metastasis burden was assessed using the Cox model.ResultsA total of 292 patients were included. ENE in cervical or intraparotid LN was not associated with DMFS, DSS, or OS. Intraparotid LN metastasis had a significant impact on prognosis, and the presence of only one metastatic intraparotid LN offered an approximately 1.5-fold risk of distant metastasis. Prognostic models based on the number of positive LNs (1 vs. 2–3 vs. 4+) were superior to the AJCC N stage in terms of DMFS, DSS, and OS.ConclusionsENE of cervical or intraparotid LN has a limited effect on the prognosis of PGC, and the number of positive LNs is better than the AJCC N stage in LN status evaluation.

Five-year analysis of neoadjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib for stage III melanoma

Five-year analysis of neoadjuvant dabrafenib and trametinib for stage III melanoma