Airway Management In Trauma Patients Research Articles

Pharmacology for Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI) Airway Management in Trauma Patients

In this video, Laura Celmins, a clinical pharmacist in the emergency department at UChicago Medicine, discusses rapid sequence intubation (RSI) medications as part of the airway management for trauma patients.

In-hospital mortality after prehospital endotracheal intubation versus alternative methods of airway management in trauma patients. A cohort study from the TraumaRegister DGU®

PurposePrehospital airway management in trauma is a key component of care and is associated with particular risks. Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is the gold standard, while extraglottic airway devices (EGAs) are recommended alternatives. There is limited evidence comparing their effectiveness. In this retrospective analysis from the TraumaRegister DGU®, we compared ETI with EGA in prehospital airway management regarding in-hospital mortality in patients with trauma.MethodsWe included cases only from German hospitals with a minimum Abbreviated Injury Scale score ≥ 2 and age ≥ 16 years. All patients without prehospital airway protection were excluded. We performed a multivariate logistic regression to adjust with the outcome measure of hospital mortality.ResultsWe included n = 10,408 cases of whom 92.5% received ETI and 7.5% EGA. The mean injury severity score was higher in the ETI group (28.8 ± 14.2) than in the EGA group (26.3 ± 14.2), and in-hospital mortality was comparable: ETI 33.0%; EGA 30.7% (27.5 to 33.9). After conducting logistic regression, the odds ratio for mortality in the ETI group was 1.091 (0.87 to 1.37). The standardized mortality ratio was 1.04 (1.01 to 1.07) in the ETI group and 1.1 (1.02 to 1.26) in the EGA group.ConclusionsThere was no significant difference in mortality rates between the use of ETI or EGA, or the ratio of expected versus observed mortality when using ETI.

Airway Management of Suspected Traumatic Brain Injury Patients in the Emergency Room

AbstractThe patients of trauma offers a special challenge because of the associated head injury, maxillofacial, neck and spine injuries, which puts the airway at imminent risk. The response time for the emergency team to initiate the airway management determines the outcome of the individual undergoing treatment. A judious implementatin of triage and Advanced Trauma Life Suport (ATLS) guidelines are helpful in the allocation of resources in airway management of trauma patients. One must not get distracted with the severity of other organ systems because cerebral tissue permits a low threshold to the hypoxic insults. Adequate preparedness and a team effort result in better airway management and improved outcomes in trauma patients with variable hemodynamic response to resuscitation. All possible efforts must be made to secure a definitive airway (if required) and should be verified clinically as well as with the available adjuncts. The success of a trauma team depends on the familiarity to the airways devices and their discrete application in various situations.

Tracheal intubation practices and adverse events in trauma victims on arrival to trauma triage: A single centre prospective observational study.

Background and Aims:Trauma is one of the leading causes of global disease burden. Data on airway management in trauma patients from developing countries, particularly India is sparse. Hence, we planned a prospective observational study to assess the airway management practice patterns and associated complications.Methods:The study was conducted in trauma triage of a tertiary care hospital. Data was collected on all tracheal intubations occurring in trauma victims requiring definitive airway control, a detailed proforma including patient details, mode of injury, drugs used, intubation procedure, and complications were filled out for each patient.Results:We observed that the airway in trauma patients was primarily managed by non-anaesthesia speciality residents (426 patients); anaesthesia residents were primarily called for deferred or difficult intubations. The first attempt success rate of intubation by anaesthesia residents was significantly higher than speciality residents (P = 0.0001; 95% CI 9.02-24.66). Non-anaesthesia residents used midazolam in varying doses (3-12 mg) for intubation, whereas, rapid sequence intubation was the most common technique used by anaesthesia residents. Airway injuries were the most frequent complication observed in 32.8% of patients intubated by specialty residents compared to 5.9% of patients intubated by anaesthesia residents.Conclusion:The trauma triage is a high-volume area for frequent tracheal intubations which are manned by non-anaesthesia speciality teams. A number of factors related to the patient, staff, availability of airway equipment and unfavourable surroundings impact airway management and may explain the high incidence of airway complications, such as airway injuries in these trauma victims.

Prehospital Airway Management for Trauma Patients by First Responders in Six Sub-Saharan African Countries and Five Other Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.

The global injury burden disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is exacerbated by a lack of robust emergency medical services. Though airway management (AM) is an essential component of prehospital emergency care, the current standard of prehospital AM training and resources for first responders in LMICs is unknown. This scoping review includes articles published between January 2000 and June 2021, identified using PMC, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS databases, following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Inclusion criteria spanned programs training formal or informal prehospital first responders. Included articles were assessed for quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Relevant characteristics were extracted by multiple authors to assess prehospital AM training. Of the initial 713 articles, 17 met inclusion criteria, representing 11 countries. Basic AM curricula were found in 11 studies and advanced AM curricula were found in nine studies. 35.3% (n = 6) of first responder programs provided no equipment to basic life support (BLS) AM training participants, reporting a median cost of $7.00USD per responder trained. Median frequency of prehospital AM intervention was reported in 31.0% (IQR: 6.0, 50.0) of patient encounters (advanced life support trainees: 12.1%, BLS trainees: 32.0%). In three studies, adverse event frequencies during intubation occurred with a median frequency of 22.0% (IQR: 21.0, 22.0). The training deficit in advanced AM interventions in LMICs suggests BLS AM courses should be prioritized, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. Prehospital AM resources are sparse and should be a priority for future development.

Challenges in airway management of trauma patients: An update

Trauma has been a widely studied subject in western world in past decade. Many international organizations have formulated guidelines regarding the management of victims who have threatened airway due to any kind of trauma. Indian subcontinent is following the western world in such situations but incidence and nature of trauma is different, moreover the availability of resources varies. This review article will highlight the topics like need for pre-hospital intubations, status of rapid sequence intubation, cricoid pressure, adjuncts for intubation and airway management of victims with trauma of special nature.“My heart and soul were wrecked; I was not sure whether my windpipe is going to make it or not”- Joshua Graham

Requirement for urgent tracheal intubation after traumatic injury: a retrospective analysis of 11,010 patients in the Trauma Audit Research Network database

Advanced airway management is a treatment priority in trauma care. It is likely that a proportion of patients who receive urgent airway management on arrival in the emergency department represent an unmet demand for airway intervention in the pre-hospital phase. This study aimed to investigate emergency airway practice in major trauma patients and establish any unmet demand in this patient group. A retrospective review of the Trauma Audit and Research Network database was performed to identify airway intervention(s) performed for patients admitted to major trauma centres in England from 01 April 2012 to 27 June 2016. In total, 11,010 patients had airway interventions: 4375 patients (43%) had their tracheas intubated in the pre-hospital setting compared with 5889 patients (57%) in the emergency department. Of the patients whose tracheas were intubated in the emergency department, this was done within 30 min of hospital arrival in 3264 patients (75%). Excluding tracheal intubation, 1593 patients had a pre-hospital airway intervention of which 881 (55%) subsequently had their trachea intubated in the emergency department; tracheal intubation was done within 30 min of arrival in the majority of these cases (805 patients (91%)). Over 70% of emergency department tracheal intubations in patients with traumatic injuries were performed within 30 min of hospital arrival; this suggests there may be an unmet demand in pre-hospital advanced airway management for trauma patients in England.

Rapid sequence induction (RSI) in trauma patients: Insights from healthcare providers.

We aimed to describe the current practice of emergency physicians and anaesthesiologists in the selection of drugs for rapid-sequence induction (RSI) among trauma patients. A prospective survey audit was conducted based on a self-administered questionnaire among two intubating specialties. The preferred type and dose of hypnotics, opioids, and muscle relaxants used for RSI in trauma patients were sought in the questionnaire. Data were compared for the use of induction agent, opioid use and muscle relaxant among stable and unstable trauma patients by the intubating specialties. A total of 102 participants were included; 47 were anaesthetists and 55 were emergency physicians. Propofol (74.5%) and Etomidate (50.0%) were the most frequently used induction agents. Significantly higher proportion of anesthesiologist used Propofol whereas, Etomidate was commonly used by emergency physicians in stable patients (P=0.001). Emergency physicians preferred Etomidate (63.6%) and Ketamine (20.0%) in unstable patients. The two groups were comparable for opioid use for stable patients. In unstable patients, use of opioid differed significantly by intubating specialties. The relation between rocuronium and suxamethonium use did change among the anaesthetists. Emergency physicians used more suxamethonium (55.6% vs. 27.7%, P=0.01) in stable as well as unstable (43.4 % vs. 27.7%, P=0.08) patients. There is variability in the use of drugs for RSI in trauma patients amongst emergency physicians and anaesthesiologists. There is a need to develop an RSI protocol using standardized types and dose of these agents to deliver an effective airway management for trauma patients.

Correlation between modified LEMON score and intubation difficulty in adult trauma patients undergoing emergency surgery

BackgroundPrediction of difficult airway is critical in the airway management of trauma patients. A LEMON method which consists of following assessments; Look-Evaluate-Mallampati-Obstruction-Neck mobility is a fast and easy technique to evaluate patients’ airways in the emergency situation. And a modified LEMON method, which excludes the Mallampati classification from the original LEMON score, also can be used clinically. We investigated the relationship between modified LEMON score and intubation difficulty score in adult trauma patients undergoing emergency surgery.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records of 114 adult trauma patients who underwent emergency surgery under general anesthesia. All patients’ airways were evaluated according to the modified LEMON method before anesthesia induction and after tracheal intubation; the intubating doctor self-reported the intubation difficulty scale (IDS) score. A difficult intubation group was defined as patients who had IDS scores > 5.ResultsThe modified LEMON score was significantly correlated with the IDS score (P < 0.001). The difficult intubation group showed higher modified LEMON score than the non-difficult intubation group (3 [2-5] vs. 2 [1-3], respectively, P = 0.017). Limited neck mobility was the only independent predictor of intubation difficulty (odds ratio, 6.15; P = 0.002).ConclusionThe modified LEMON score is correlated with difficult intubation in adult trauma patients undergoing emergency surgery.

Expert-Performed Endotracheal Intubation-Related Complications in Trauma Patients: Incidence, Possible Risk Factors, and Outcomes in the Prehospital Setting and Emergency Department.

The aim of this study was to determine complication rates and possible risk factors of expert-performed endotracheal intubation (ETI) in patients with trauma, in both the prehospital setting and the emergency department. We also investigated how the occurrence of ETI-related complications affected the survival of trauma patients. This single-center retrospective observational study included all injured patients who underwent anesthesiologist-performed ETI from 2007 to 2017. ETI-related complications were defined as hypoxemia, unrecognized esophageal intubation, regurgitation, cardiac arrest, ETI failure rescued by emergency surgical airway, dental trauma, cuff leak, and mainstem bronchus intubation. Of the 537 patients included, 23.5% experienced at least one complication. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that low Glasgow Coma Scale Score (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88–0.98), elevated heart rate (AOR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00–1.02), and three or more ETI attempts (AOR, 15.71; 95% CI, 3.37–73.2) were independent predictors of ETI-related complications. We also found that ETI-related complications decreased the likelihood of survival of trauma patients (AOR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38–0.95), independently of age, male sex, Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Scale Score, and off-hours presentation. Our results suggest that airway management in trauma patients carries a very high risk; this finding has implications for the practice of airway management in injured patients.

Intubation through a supraglottic airway device with cervical spine immobilisation: a comparison between the intubating laryngeal mask airway and the intubating laryngeal tube used by novices - a manikin study.

Objectives. Supraglottic airway devices play an important role during airway management of trauma patients with suspected or present injury to the cervical spine. The aim of this study was to evaluate the Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway (ILMA) and the new Intubating Laryngeal Tube in the hands of residents with minimal previous intubation experience during simulated conditions of reduced cervical spine mobility. Methods. Thirty first year anaesthetic trainees participated in the study (F=18, M=12). The time required to insert the supraglottic airway device and ventilate through it as well as the insertion to intubation and successful ventilation time were recorded. Efficacy of intubation and the ease of use by the operator were also assessed. The two devices were used by each participant and they were randomly chosen. All trainees participating in the study had minimal intubation experience (<10 intubations previously performed) and were novices in this field. Results. The mean time required to insert the supraglottic airway device and ventilate through it was similar for both of the studied devices (p=0.9384). The Intubating Laryngeal Tube had the shortest insertion to intubation and successful ventilation time 25.41 s (±8.62) vs. 31.92 s (±8.82), p<0.05. There were no failed intubation attempts when the Intubating Laryngeal Tube was used. Conclusions. The new Intubating Laryngeal Tube may be a good alternative to the ILMA as it shortens the time required to intubate and successfully ventilate the patient. It also improves the rate of successful intubation. Key words: supraglottic airway device, intubation, manikin study, cervical spine immobilisation, novices

Management of the Traumatized Airway.

There is a lack of evidence-based approach regarding the best practice for airway management in patients with a traumatized airway. General recommendations for the management of the traumatized airway are summarized in table 5. Airway trauma may not be readily apparent, and its evaluation requires a high level of suspicion for airway disruption and compression. For patients with facial trauma, control of the airway may be significantly impacted by edema, bleeding, inability to clear secretions, loss of bony support, and difficulty with face mask ventilation. With the airway compression from neck swelling or hematoma, intubation attempts can further compromise the airway due to expanding hematoma. For patients with airway disruption, the goal is to pass the tube across the injured area without disrupting it or to insert the airway distal to the injury using a surgical approach. If airway injury is extensive, a surgical airway distal to the site of injury may be the best initial approach. Alternatively, if orotracheal intubation is chosen, spontaneous ventilation may be maintained or RSI may be performed. RSI is a common approach. Thus, some of the patients intubated may subsequently require tracheostomy. A stable patient with limited injuries may not require intubation but should be watched carefully for at least several hours. Because of a paucity of evidence-based data, the choice between these approaches and the techniques utilized is a clinical decision depending on the patient's condition, clinical setting, injuries to airway and other organs, and available personnel, expertise, and equipment. Inability to obtain a definitive airway is always an absolute indication for an emergency cricothyroidotomy or surgical tracheostomy.

Advanced airway management for pre-hospital trauma patients

The need for timely and appropriate airway management for trauma patients is widely recognised. There are a small number of severely injured patients who cannot be adequately supported with basic airway manoeuvres, and require early advanced airway management. The way in which this care is provided remains highly controversial. Whilst it is clear that effective airway management remains a priority for all patients and poorly performed pre-hospital anaesthesia may be detrimental to patient outcome, debate remains over exactly which patients will benefit from early advanced airway interventions, and how it should be provided. The evidence base is small and inconsistent, with significant heterogeneity in the reported data, making it impossible to draw meaningful conclusions. Current practice is not standardised, and care is delivered by providers of different abilities using a range of equipment and techniques. Standards of care provided during in-hospital practice relating to these issues of provider competence, equipment, and monitoring should be directly translated into delivery of care outside the hospital, but this is not always the case. The aim of this review is to evaluate the current evidence surrounding pre-hospital advanced airway management.

Physician-Led Prehospital Airway Management in Trauma

To assess airway management of trauma patients in a physician-led prehospital system in England, researchers conducted a retrospective database review of 7256 prehospital trauma intubations from 1991 to 2012. Forty-six patients (0.6%) received primary surgical cricothyroidotomy. Of the remaining patients, intubation was successful in 99.3%. Among the 52 patients who could …

Is there a requirement for advanced airway management for trauma patients in the pre-hospital phase of care?

Method Over a one year period (April 2012-March 2013) all prehospital trauma patients attended by the doctor-paramedic LAA team who were identified as having airway compromise or an indication for any airway intervention on scene were included in a prospective observational study. The doctor paramedic team recorded any airway compromise on arrival and prior interventions carried out by ambulance service personnel.

Management of the trauma airway

A priority for all trauma patients is rapid assessment and appropriate, prompt and effective management of the airway. Adequate ventilation and tissue oxygenation can prevent hypoxic injury, particularly within the central nervous system. Failure to secure the airway soon enough is a major cause of preventable death following significant injury (Ivatury and Guilford, 2008). Many controversial issues surround the management of the trauma airway including the effect of early tracheal intubation on morbidity and mortality, the variation in failed intubation rates for paramedics compared with physicians, and the use of manual in-line stabilisation and cricoid pressure during tracheal intubation. Studies have attempted to address these and other questions related to airway management in trauma patients. Unfortunately, many variables within the studies make interpretation of the results difficult. This review aims to summarise the key issues in relation to all of these controversies.

Emergency Airway Management in Trauma Patients Using Laryngeal Tube Suction

Background. Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is considered to be the “gold standard” of prehospital airway management of trauma patients. However, ETI requires substantial technical skills and ongoing experience. Because failed prehospital ETI is common and associated with a higher mortality, reliable airway devices are needed to be used by rescuers who are less experienced in ETI. Objective. To prospectively evaluate the feasibility of the use of laryngeal tubes by paramedics and emergency physicians for out-of-hospital airway management in trauma patients. Methods. During a 40-month period, data for all cases of prehospital use of the laryngeal tube suction disposable (LTS-D) within a large metropolitan area were recorded by a standardized questionnaire. We determined indications for laryngeal tube use, placement success, number of placement attempts, placement time, and personal level of experience. All patients admitted to our institution also underwent in-hospital follow-up. Results. Fifty-six of 57 prehospital intubations attempts with the LTS-D were successfully performed by paramedics (n = 19) or emergency physicians (n = 37) within one (n = 50) or two (n = 6) placement attempts. The device was used as initial airway (n = 27) or rescue device after failed ETI (n = 30). The placement time was ≤45 seconds (n = 42), 46–90 seconds (n = 13), and >90 seconds (n = 1). The majority of users (n = 44) were relative novices with no more than 10 previous laryngeal tube placements on actual patients. Of 33 patients eligible for follow-up, one underwent urgent LTS-D removal and subsequent ETI upon hospital admission, six underwent ETI after primary survey, and 26 underwent both primary and secondary survey or even damage-control surgery with the LTS-D. Conclusion. The LTS-D represents a promising alternative to ETI in the hands of both paramedics and emergency physicians. It can be used as an initial tool to secure the airway until ETI is prepared, as a definitive airway by rescuers less experienced in ETI, or as a rescue device when ETI has failed.

The future of paramedic intubation: who should be responsible?

Prehospital airway management in trauma patients has been the subject of debate among many professionals for a number of years. At present, the gold standard for airway management and optimal ventilation is endotracheal intubation. Paramedics, as the frontline prehospital care providers, are currently able to practice endotracheal intubation in order to secure an airway, but only when the patient is comatose with no gag reflex. Training in endotracheal intubation has been under close scrutiny by regulatory bodies such as the Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Service Liaison Committee, with emphasis on using other techniques to secure the airway, including supra-glottic airway devices. Rapid sequence induction and drug assisted airway management is only carried out by doctors working in the prehospital arena. However, a number of studies document that paramedics are more than capable of carrying out successful rapid sequence induction in trauma patients. This article considers the training received by paramedics in airway management, techniques that are employed and the influence of current literature on the debate over paramedic endotracheal intubation.

Airway management and initial resuscitation of the trauma patient

This review will analyze and comment on selected recent literature pertaining to airway management and initial fluid resuscitation in the trauma patient. It will also review airway devices currently being used in the trauma setting. Although a recent study has questioned the efficacy of manual inline immobilization, this technique continues to be endorsed by trauma guidelines and is safely used in most trauma centers. Clinicians have also incorporated the use of videolaryngoscopy and other adjuncts for difficult airway management in trauma patients. However, no single airway management tool has proven to be superior in this setting. Crystalloid solutions remain frontline therapy for the initial resuscitation of the hemorrhagic trauma patient, as studies with hypertonic saline and vasopressors have not shown superior results. Conversely, increased amounts of fresh frozen plasma and fibrinogen have been reported to increase survival in trauma patients. As trauma continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, the use of newer airway adjuncts needs to be specifically investigated in trauma patients, as this population frequently has airway management difficulties. Further research is also required to elucidate the type and amount of fluid that will provide an adequate organ perfusion without increasing nonsurgical bleeding.

Emergency intubation using a light wand in patients with facial trauma

Airway management in the operating room is the responsibility of anesthesiologists, although a variety of personnel may be responsible for airway management outside the operating room. Emergency department physicians are prominently involved in airway management in the emergency room both independently and with anesthesiologists. Airway management in trauma patients remains the domain of anesthesiologists. An 18-year old male patient was brought to our emergency room after an alleged history of suicidal attempt with gunshot under the chin. He was scheduled to undergo emergency tracheotomy, debridement, and closure of facial laceration under general anaesthesia, presenting a challenge for. He had to undergo emergency tracheotomy, debridement, and closure of facial lacerations under general anesthesia. The injuries made the patient's airway management a complex issue. We present the use of the light wand to manage the difficult airway of this patient with complex facial trauma.