Air Polishing Research Articles

Different methods of professional oral hygiene. Literature review

Relevance. The problem of the effectiveness of oral hygiene is currently relevant due to the introduction of new tools and methods of Prophylaxis hygiene.Objective. The aim of this study is to Conduct a literature review from different database on modern methods of professional oral hygiene using the keywords: air polishing; glycine; sodium bicarbonate; dental caries; alternative methods, air abrasive. To study different literature sources on the effectiveness of using modern air-abrasive procedures for professional hygiene.Methods. Electronic databases PubMed, eLibrary were screened. Selected studies that investigate the efficacy of various professional hygiene practices and their effects on the state of the oral cavity.Results. By keywords, 1345 abstracts were found that cover the results of scaling – 544, polishing – 704, remineralization – 97. 24 were included in the analysis on various methods of oral hygiene, taking into account the state of hard and soft tissues when using air-abrasive polishing.Conclusion. Data confirms the variety of professional oral hygiene methods used and the efficacy of their results. Studies on the impact of various procedures of curette, scaling, and polishing on tooth tissues have shown conflicting findings. More research into the efficacy of professional oral hygiene practices is required.

Artificial biofilm removal in a peri-implant mucositis model: Efficacy of air polishing technology as adjunct to ultrasonic debridement alone and impact of the site and the depth of mucosal tunnel-An in vitro study.

The current in vitro model aims to evaluate the adjunctive effect on artificial biofilm removal determined by the use of a glycine-powder air-polishing procedure (GPAP) over the ultrasonic debridement (USD) alone when the removal of artificial biofilm on abutment surface is performed. The procedures were carried out also evaluating the impact of the site (mesial, distal, vestibular, and oral) and three different mucosal tunnel depths (2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm). Single tooth implant replacement was simulated. Three different abutment heights together with a prosthetic contour were investigated (2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm); custom-made gingival masks were created to mimic peri-implant soft tissue. Biofilm was simulated with an indelible ink. The protocol consisted in two intervention stages for each abutment: (a) USD with PEEK tip plus (b) GPAP. At the end of each intervention, abutments were unscrewed, and standardized photographs were taken. Statistical analysis was carried out to compare residual stain percentage between the two intervention stages and among different sites and mucosal tunnels. A total of 30 abutments were instrumented. A significant reduction of the percentage of residual staining (PRS) after the combination of GPAP + USD over USD alone was demonstrated (16% vs. 32%; p < 0.05). Moreover, the better performance of the GPAP + USD protocol was observed regardless of the different mucosal tunnel heights and the sites analyzed. Intragroup analysis unveils that the smaller PRS was observed for shallow mucosal tunnels (2 mm) and vestibular sites for both protocols. GPAP + USD provided adjunctive effect on artificial biofilm removal in comparison to the USD alone. Furthermore, proximal surfaces and deeper mucosal tunnels (4 and 6 mm) showed a reduced instrumentation efficacy for both protocols.

Efficacy of air polishing in comparison with hand instruments and/or power-driven instruments in supportive periodontal therapy and implant maintenance: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundSupportive periodontal therapy (SPT) is the key for a stable periodontal health following active treatment. Likewise, implant maintenance is crucial following implant placement. This systematic review aimed to assess clinical outcomes, patients’ perception, and cost-effectiveness of repeated periodontal therapy with air polishing devices (APDs) in comparison with hand instruments and/or power-driven instruments (conventional interventions) in SPT and implant maintenance.MethodsElectronic search for randomised controlled clinical trials with minimum 6 months follow-up for SPT and implant maintenance programme was conducted for data published from 01 January 2000 to 30 April 2020 using multiple databases and hand searching. Risk of bias was assessed using the Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool (RoB 2).ResultsA total of 823 articles were screened. 4 SPT and 2 implant maintenance studies were eligible for inclusion. For SPT, repeated APDs interventions revealed no statistically significant difference when compared to the conventional interventions (weighted mean difference [WMD] 0.11 mm, p = 0.08). Likewise, no statistical difference was noted in terms of percentage of bleeding on probing (BOP) and clinical attachment level (CAL) gain. APDs were associated with lower pain score (based on Visual Analogue Scale) and higher patient acceptance in SPT studies. For implant maintenance, APDs resulted in reduction in PPD and percentage of BOP. However, CAL gain was comparable between the two groups. In terms of patient reported outcomes, no implant maintenance studies recorded any forms of patient reported outcomes. In addition, no studies reported on economic evaluation of APDs in both SPT and implant maintenance.ConclusionWithin the limitations of this systematic review and meta-analysis, repeated subgingival debridement using APDs in SPT resulted in similar clinical outcomes but better patients’ comfort when compared to the conventional interventions. For implant maintenance, there is limited evidence to show that repeated application of APDs leads to improved clinical outcomes when compared to conventional treatments.

Subgingival air polishing with trehalose powder during supportive periodontal therapy: use of a conical shaped tip during a randomized clinical trial

BackgroundThis study investigated clinical parameters using a new air-polishing device compared to sonic scaling for subgingival biofilm removal during supportive periodontal therapy. The aim was to evaluate noninferiority of air-polishing compared to sonic scaling in deeper periodontal pockets with respect to pocket depth (PD).MethodsIn 44 participants, 2 single-rooted teeth [(PD) ≥ 5 mm] were treated using a split-mouth design. While a new air polishing device with a conical shaped tip was used for the experimental group, sonic scaling was performed in the control group. PD, clinical attachment level (CAL), and bleeding on probing (BOP) were recorded at baseline, (T0) after 3 months (T1) and 6 months (T2). Pain perception was rated using a visual analog scale (VAS; 0 = no pain, 100 = maximum pain).ResultsPD and CAL decreased significantly for both groups, while no intergroup differences were found (PD [mean, mm] control T0 5.96, T2 4.75; experimental T0 5.96, T2 4.8; intergroup p = 0.998; CAL [mean, mm] control T0 7.38, T2 5.84; experimental T0 7.28, T2 6.34; intergroup p = 0.368). For BOP, no intergroup differences were found from T0 to T2 (reduction control 42.5%; experimental 46.5% p = 0.398). Pain perception was significantly lower for air polishing (VAS [mean, mm] control 28.8, experimental 12.56; p = 0.006).ConclusionNone of the two treatment procedures showed inferior clinical effects with regard to PD, CAL and BOP with air polishing being more comfortable to patients.Trial registration The study was registered in an international trial register on August 14/08/2019, before the start of recruitment (German Clinical Trial Register number DRKS00017844).

Is There a Connection between Tooth Loss and Gastrointestinal Disorders?-A MiniReview

Objective: This mini review intended to study association between tooth loss and gastrointestinal disorders. Data Sources: There was a manual search of major journals and references in the reference list as well as electronic databases such as Springer Link, Science Direct, and PubMed. Duration:January 2000 and December 2021 Methods and Results: A total of 116 papers covering 17 categories of decontamination procedures were included in this evaluation. Among the decontamination techniques used were coatings, mechanical cleaning, laser treatment and photodynamic therapy, as well as air polishing and anodizing. Other techniques included radiation, sonication and thermal treatment. Biofilm generation and decontamination on titanium implants may be prevented and eliminated using most of the disinfection techniques studied. For future study in the creation of novel dental implants and decontamination processes, this narrative systematic review gives a description of methodologies. Keywords:Tooth loss, gastrointestinal diseases, chewing efficiency, nutritional intake and nutrition are some of the topics covered in this article

Is There a Connection between Tooth loss and Gastrointestinal Disorders?-A Mini Review

Objective: This mini review intended to study association between tooth loss and gastrointestinal disorders. Data Sources: There was a manual search of major journals and references in the reference list as well as electronic databases such as Springer Link, Science Direct, and PubMed. Duration: January 2000 and December 2021 Methods and Results: A total of 116 papers covering 17 categories of decontamination procedures were included in this evaluation. Among the decontamination techniques used were coatings, mechanical cleaning, laser treatment and photodynamic therapy, as well as air polishing and anodizing. Other techniques included radiation, sonication and thermal treatment. Biofilm generation and decontamination on titanium implants may be prevented and eliminated using most of the disinfection techniques studied. For future study in the creation of novel dental implants and decontamination processes, this narrative systematic review gives a description of methodologies. Keywords: Tooth loss, gastrointestinal diseases, chewing efficiency, nutritional intake and nutrition are some of the topics covered in this article.

In vitro Analysis of Surface Roughness Produced by an Air Polishing Device and Conventional Root Planing on Cementum: A Profilometric Study.

Context:Tooth surface polishing is an integral part of periodontal therapy. Enamel and cementum show a smooth surface clinically after debridement with the naked eye, but numerous surface irregularities can be detected microscopically. Air polishing is safe and effective when used by trained professionals.Aims:The aim of the study is to evaluate and compare the surface roughness of cementum by using an air polishing device and conventional root planing with hand instruments.Materials and Methods:A total of 45 extracted teeth stored in saline were divided into three groups randomly – Group A (conventional root planing), Group B (hand instrumentation and air polishing), and Group C (air polishing alone) – with 15 samples each. Samples were evaluated for surface roughness by using profilometer. Six parameters were checked for surface roughness.Statistical Analysis Used:The data were collected, charted, and analyzed using one-way ANOVA with post hoc LSD method for pairwise comparisons.Results:Least amount of surface roughness was achieved with Group C when compared with Group A and Group B. These differences were statistical significant (P < 0.0001).Conclusions:Air polishing can effectively smoothen the root surface by removing surface irregularities which are produced hand/ultrasonic instruments. Profilometer can be effectively used to measure the surface roughness.

Comparison of antimicrobial effect of several decontaminating methods on contaminated Titanium discs

Decontaminating the implant surface, exposed to bacterial biofilm, is a concern in the treatment of peri-implant inflammatory disease. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of several methods on reduction of the bacterial load, colonized on the surfaces of titanium discs.In this in vivo study, seven titanium discs with Sandblasted, Large-grit, acid-etched (SLA) surface were placed in the mouth of each of ten patients with chronic periodontitis by an intra-oral maxillary splint for 24 h. In each patient, the contaminated discs, except for the negative control ones, were randomly treated by one of the six antiseptic methods including sterile normal saline, plastic curette, air polisher, hydrogen peroxide, 980 nm diode laser, and Er-YAG laser. A spectrophotometer was used to measure Optical Density (OD) in case of aerobic microorganisms. Colony-Forming Units (CFUs) were used for anaerobic bacteria. Data were analyzed through Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney Tests at a significance level of α =0.05 by SPSS software.Statistical analysis showed a significant decrease in OD of aerobic bacteria among the seven groups during a 0-24 h time interval (P < 0.001). Furthermore, these tests showed a significant difference in the CFU (P < 0.001) for anaerobic bacteria after 48 h.The results of this study showed that all of the adopted methods significantly reduced microbial colonies on the surfaces of titanium discs with SLA surface. Er: YAG laser and normal saline had the highest and the lowest effects, respectively.

Efficacy of Combined Mechanical and Chemical Decontamination Treatments on Smooth and Rough Titanium Surfaces and Their Effects on Osteoconduction: An Ex Vivo Study.

The aim of this ex vivo study was to assess the ability to remove oral biofilm by different combinations of mechanical and chemical treatments on smooth and rough titanium surfaces, as well as their impact on osteoconduction. Forty-eight sandblasted acid-etched (SLA) and 48 machined titanium disks were contaminated with oral bacterial biofilm and exposed to the following treatments: (1) titanium brush (TB), (2) TB + 40% citric acid (CA), (3) TB + 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), (4) air polishing with glycine powder (AP), (5) AP + 40% CA, and (6) AP + 5.25% NaOCl. Residual bacteria and chemical contamination were assessed using viable bacterial count assay, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and x-ray spectroscopy (XPS). Human primary osteoblast (hOB) adhesion and osteocalcin (OC) release were also evaluated. The microbiologic, SEM, and XPS analysis indicate a higher biofilm removal efficiency of combined mechanical-chemical treatments compared with exclusively mechanical approaches, especially on SLA surfaces. SEM analysis revealed significant alterations of surface microtopography on the disks treated with TB, while no changes were observed after AP treatment. OC release by hOBs was mainly decreased on disks treated with CA and NaOCl. The combination of mechanical and chemical treatments provides effective oral biofilm removal on both SLA and machined implant surfaces. NaOCl and CA may have a negative effect on osteoblasts cultured on SLA samples.

Non-surgical Periodontal Treatment: SRP and Innovative Therapeutic Approaches.

Periodontitis is a major public health problem, that can have local and systemic consequences ranging from tooth loss to the aggravation of other chronic diseases. The consequences of which have an impact on patient's overall general health and quality of life. Periodontal treatments include a large range of techniques and concepts from plaque control to periodontal debridement, surgery and regeneration. Regardless of the treatment proposed, it always begins with the same first essential simple step that is etiological therapy which includes oral hygiene management and the control of periodontal risk factors. The aim of this first step, presented in this chapter, consists mainly in reducing oral bacterial load and inflammation by the means of daily oral hygiene methods and sub-gingival biofilm disruption. Although understanding of the pathogenesis and molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in periodontitis has increased, treatment wise, non-surgical debridement remains the keystone of every periodontal treatment and supportive periodontal therapy. Once risk factors are monitored and plaque control mastered by the patient, root instrumentation can be performed with hand or power-driven instruments. However effective, sub-gingival biofilm disruption has some limits and can be improved with adjunctive therapies such as antiseptics, antibiotics, air polishing or other emerging devices and therapies. Unfortunately, the lack of clear clinical guidelines, concerning these adjunctive therapies, still remains, thus pointing out the necessity of more standardized clinical studies. Also, if some patients can return to a healthy periodontal state, most periodontal patients will remain at periodontal risk for life. Proper assessment of the patient's periodontal risk will help establish correct monitoring of patients successfully treated for their periodontal disease.

Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Investigating the Efficacy of Different Nonsurgical Therapies for the Treatment of Peri-implant Diseases.

To summarize the methodologic quality and outcome measures from systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating the efficacy of different nonsurgical therapies for the treatment of peri-implant diseases. Two review authors independently searched for systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating the efficacy of different nonsurgical therapies for treatment of peri-implant diseases in three different databases: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. In addition, journals with a high impact factor in the fields of periodontics, prosthodontics, oral maxillofacial surgery, and implant dentistry were analyzed for potential reviews. The search was implemented from January 2010 through August 2020. Eligible reviews were screened and assessed to determine the characteristics and outcome measures. Furthermore, two review authors independently evaluated the methodologic quality by using the AMSTAR tool and the checklist proposed by Glenny et al. The interrater agreement was assessed by using the Cohen kappa coefficient. The assessment of correlation between the findings of the AMSTAR tool and Glenny et al checklist was performed by using the Spearman correlation. Fifteen systematic reviews and 12 meta-analyses were evaluated based on the inclusion criteria. One review investigated the efficacy of growth factors and another investigated glycine powder air polishing, 5 evaluated the role of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy, 8 assessed the effect of laser therapy, and 13 compared the different nonsurgical therapies with the surgical therapies for the treatment of peri-implant diseases. The quality assessment score evaluated by the AMSTAR checklist ranged from 5 to 11 with a mean of 7.5 ± 1.8, whereas the score evaluated by the Glenny et al checklist ranged from 3 to 14 with a mean of 9.7 ± 2.8. Spearman correlation analysis between these two tools reported a high correlation (r = 0.91) that was statistically significant (P < .001). The summarized evidence of this overview shows that the different nonsurgical therapies are effective for the treatment of peri-implant mucositis. The lack of sufficient long-term data involving large datasets results in their inconclusive efficacy in the treatment of peri-implantitis. However, the summary is determined from the moderate quality of evidence. Hence, future well-designed high-quality trials are encouraged to reassess the findings.

Efficacy of Instruments for Professional Oral Hygiene on Dental Implants: A Systematic Review

Professional oral hygiene is fundamental to prevent peri-implant disease. Appropriate instruments should be used in patients with restorations supported by dental implants: they should be effective in deposits removal without damaging the implant components surface. The aim of the present study is to investigate and summarize the results regarding the efficacy of oral hygiene techniques described in the literature in the last 10 years in patients rehabilitated with dental implants not affected by perimplantitis. The present systematic review was conducted according to guidelines reported in the indications of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). The focused question was: “Which are the most effective instruments for professional oral hygiene on implants not affected by perimplantitis?”. The initial database search yielded a total of 934 entries found in PubMed®/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library. After full text review and application of the eligibility criteria, the final selection consisted of 19 articles. The risk of bias of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa scale (NOS) and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Curette, scalers and air polishing were the devices most frequently investigated in the included studies. In particular, glycine powder air polishing appeared to be significantly effective in reducing peri-implant inflammation and plaque around implants. The application of the more recent erythritol powder air polishing also yielded good clinical outcomes. Further studies are needed to improve the knowledge on the topic in order to develop standardized protocols and understand the specific indications for different types of implant-supported rehabilitations.

Erythritol air polishing in the surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: A randomized controlled trial.

ObjectivesTo compare erythritol air polishing with implant surface cleansing using saline during the surgical treatment of peri‐implantitis.Material and MethodsDuring a resective surgical intervention, implant surfaces were randomly treated with either air polishing (test group n = 26 patients/53 implants) or saline‐soaked cotton gauzes (control group n = 31 patients/ 40 implants). Primary outcome was change in mean bleeding on probing (BoP) from baseline to 12 months follow‐up. Secondary outcomes were changes in mean suppuration on probing (SoP), plaque score (Plq), probing pocket depth (PPD), marginal bone loss (MBL), periodontal full‐mouth scores (PFMS), and levels of 8 classical periodontal pathogens. Clinical and radiographical parameters were analyzed using multilevel regression analyses. Microbiological outcomes were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test.ResultsNo differences between the test and control group were found for BoP over 12 months of follow‐up, nor for the secondary parameters Plq, PPD, and MBL. Between both groups, a significant difference was found for the levels of SoP (p = 0.035). No significant effect on microbiological levels was found. A total number of 6 implants were lost in the test group and 10 in the control group. At 1‐year follow‐up, a successful treatment outcome (PPD<5 mm, max 1 out of 6 sites BoP, no suppuration and no progressive bone loss >0.5 mm) was achieved for a total of 18 implants (19.2%).ConclusionsErythritol air polishing as implant surface cleansing method was not more effective than saline during resective surgical treatment of peri‐implantitis in terms of clinical, radiographical, and microbiological parameters. Both therapies resulted in low treatment success.Trial registry: https://www.trialregister.nl/ Identifier: NL8621.

Glycine air-polishing versus curette debridement for the treatment of peri-implant mucositis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The authors aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of glycine air-polishing compared to curette debridement on the treatment of peri-implant diseases. PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews were followed. Clinical trials of patients diagnosed with peri-implant mucositis or peri-implantitis treated with glycine air-polishing or curette debridement were selected. Six electronic databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science and BVS) were searched until july 2021. The risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools and the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. Bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD) and plaque index (PI) were assessed. Subgroup analyses were performed considering the follow-up period for peri-implant mucositis. Seven studies were included and meta-analyses were performed with three randomized clinical trials (RCTs), all presenting a low risk of bias. Low quality of evidence was achieved. Both treatments presented similar global results on the BOP and PI peri-implant mucositis analyses. Glycine air-polishing showed better results (p=0.04; I 2 =90%) on PD peri-implant mucositis meta-analysis. Data was insufficient to perform any analysis considering peri-implantitis. Although there was modest effect of glycine air polishing on probing depth compared to manual curatagge, there is insufficient evidence to suggest either glycine air-polishing or curette debridement to reduce signs of peri-implant diseases (CRD42019128599).

In Vitro Evaluation of the Abrasiveness of Novel Bioactive Glass Powders (Biominf®) on Ivory Dentine in Air Polishing Procedures Compared to Selected Reference Powders

In Vitro Evaluation of the Abrasiveness of Novel Bioactive Glass Powders (Biominf®) on Ivory Dentine in Air Polishing Procedures Compared to Selected Reference Powders

Antimicrobial Impact of Different Air-Polishing Powders in a Subgingival Biofilm Model.

Subgingival air-polishing devices (SAPD) can reduce bacterial biofilms and thus support periodontal healing. The authors of this study evaluated the effectiveness of the glycine-based and trehalose-based air-polishing powders in removing pathogenic bacteria in a subgingival biofilm model. We treated 56 subgingival pockets in porcine jaws with SAPD. Subgingival air polishing was performed in three groups of 13 pockets each: I, glycine-based powder; II, trehalose-based powder; and III, water alone. Another group (IV) served as untreated controls. Prior to air polishing, inoculated titanium bars were inserted into the pockets containing periopathogenic bacteria such as Porphyromonas gingivalis and Tannerella forsythia. Remaining bacteria were evaluated using real-time PCR. The numbers of remaining bacteria depended on the treatment procedure, with the lowest number of total bacteria in group I (median: 1.96 × 106 CFU; min: 1.46 × 105; max: 9.30 × 106). Both polishing powders in groups I and II (median: 1.36 × 107 CFU; min: 5.22 × 105; max: 7.50 × 107) showed a statistically significantly lower total bacterial load in comparison to both group IV (median: 2.02 × 108 CFU; min: 5.14 × 107; max: 4.51 × 108; p < 0.05) and group III (median: 4.58 × 107 CFU; min: 2.00 × 106; max: 3.06 × 108; p < 0.05). Both subgingival air-polishing powders investigated can reduce periopathogenic bacteria and thus support antimicrobial therapy approaches in periodontal treatment regimens.

The Effect of Ultrasonic Scaling and Air-Powder Polishing on the Roughness of the Enamel, Three Different Nanocomposites, and Composite/Enamel and Composite/Cementum Interfaces.

We aimed to assess the effects of ultrasonic scaling and air-powder polishing on the roughness of enamel, three nanocomposites (Premise, Herculite Ultra, Harmonize), and composite/enamel and composite/cementum interfaces. Class V cavities were restored in 99 extracted third molars with one of the three nanocomposites and treated with ultrasonic scaler or air-powder polishing device (calcium carbonate or sodium bicarbonate powders). The roughness (Ra) of the investigated surfaces was measured with contact profilometer before and after treatment. The data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. Specimens’ Ra values before instrumentation were near the clinically acceptable 0.2 μm threshold. All techniques increased the roughness of the tested surfaces; however, the enamel was slightly affected. The mean Ra values after prophylaxis for composite, composite/cementum and composite/enamel surfaces were 0.32–0.55, 1.33–1.73, and 1.25–1.36, respectively. The extent of composite surface damage was material dependent. Premise surface was not altered by ultrasonic scaling significantly. Air-powder polishing with both powders produced a greater increase in surface roughness of composite resin and restorations margins than ultrasonic scaling. The Ra values after both types of air polishing for Herculite Ultra and Harmonize were approximately 1.5 and 2 times higher, respectively, than those after ultrasonic scaling (p < 0.05).

Evaluation The Surface Roughness of New Composite Materials After Using Different Polishing Methods

Prophylaxis methods are used to mechanically remove plaque and stain from tooth surfaces; such methods give rise to loss of superficial structure and roughen the surface of composites as a result of their abrasive action. This study was done to assess the effect of three polishing systems on surface texture of new anterior composites after storage in artificial saliva. Materials and methods: Twenty samples of Giomer and twenty samples of B 90 (3M ESPE) composite discs of 12 mm internal diameter and 3mm height were prepared using a specially designed cylindrical mold and were stored in artificial saliva for one month and then the samples were divided into four groups according to surface treatment: Group A (control group):10 specimens received no surface polish and were subdivided into 5 samples of A1 Giomer and 5 samples of A2 B 90 composite.Group B: 10 specimens received polishing with Air polishing devise (APD) and were subdivided into 5 samples of B1 Giomer and 5 samples of B2 B 90 composite. Group C: 10 specimens received polishing with pumice and brush and were subdivided into 5 samples of C1 Giomer and 5 samples of C2 B 90 composite.Group D: 10 specimens were polished with pumice and rubber cup and were subdivided into 5 samples of D1 Giomer and 5 samples of D2 B 90 composite.Testing was done by means of profilometer and statistically analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, LSD and student t-test. Results: The results showed a highly statistical significant difference in surface roughness among Giomer subgroups P

Microbial Biofilm Decontamination on Dental Implant Surfaces: A Mini Review.

IntroductionAfter insertion into the bone, implants osseointegrate, which is required for their long-term success. However, inflammation and infection around the implants may lead to implant failure leading to peri-implantitis and loss of supporting bone, which may eventually lead to failure of implant. Surface chemistry of the implant and lack of cleanliness on the part of the patient are related to peri-implantitis. The only way to get rid of this infection is decontamination of dental implants.ObjectiveThis systematic review intended to study decontamination of microbial biofilm methods on titanium implant surfaces used in dentistry.MethodsThe electronic databases Springer Link, Science Direct, and PubMed were explored from their inception until December 2020 to identify relevant studies. Studies included had to evaluate the efficiency of new strategies either to prevent formation of biofilm or to treat matured biofilm on dental implant surfaces.Results and DiscussionIn this systematic review, 17 different groups of decontamination methods were summarized from 116 studies. The decontamination methods included coating materials, mechanical cleaning, laser treatment, photodynamic therapy, air polishing, anodizing treatment, radiation, sonication, thermal treatment, ultrasound treatment, chemical treatment, electrochemical treatment, antimicrobial drugs, argon treatment, and probiotics.ConclusionThe findings suggest that most of the decontamination methods were effective in preventing the formation of biofilm and in decontaminating established biofilm on dental implants. This narrative review provides a summary of methods for future research in the development of new dental implants and decontamination techniques.

Sliding behaviour and surface quality after static air polishing of conventional and modern bracket materials : In vitro analysis.

As part of orthodontic treatment, air polishing is routinely used for professional tooth cleaning. Thus, we investigated the effects of static powder polishing on sliding behaviour and surface quality of three different bracket materials (polymer, ceramic, metal), including a3D-printed bracket. Two bracket types of each material group were polished with an air-polishing device using sodium bicarbonate. Exposure times were set at 10, 20, and 60 s; the application distance was 5 mm. The force loss due to sliding resistance was tested with an orthodontic measurement and simulation system (OMSS) using a0.016 inch × 0.022 inch stainless steel archwire. Untreated brackets served as control. Polishing effects and slot precision were evaluated using an optical digital and scanning electron microscope. Sliding behaviour and slot precision differed significantly between and within the groups. Prior to polishing, polymer brackets showed the least force loss, ceramic brackets the highest. With progressive polishing time, the resistance increased significantly with titanium brackets (26 to 37%) and decreased significantly with steel brackets (36 to 25%). Polymer brackets showed the smallest changes in force loss with respect to polishing duration. Slot precision showed the largest differences between material groups and was primarily manufacturer-dependent with hardly any changes due to the polishing time. Powder polishing can positively or negatively affect the sliding properties of the bracket-archwire complex but is more dependent on the bracket-archwire material combination (i.e., manufacture-dependent slot precision). For titanium brackets, resistance only increased after 60 s of polishing. For ceramic brackets, effective reduction was observed after 10 s of polishing. Polymer brackets, including the 3D-printed brackets, showed better sliding properties than ceramic or metal brackets even after polishing for 60 s. Removal of plaque and dental calculus should lead to anoticeable improvement of the sliding properties and outweighs structural defects that may develop.