Aim Point Research Articles

Percutaneous screw fixation of the iliosacral joint: A case-based preoperative planning approach reduces operating time and radiation exposure

IntroductionA preoperative planning approach for percutaneous screw fixation of the iliosacral joint provides specific entry points (EPs) and aiming points (APs) of intraosseous screw pathways (as defined by CT scans) for lateral fluoroscopic projections used intraoperatively. The potential to achieve the recommended EPs and APs, to obtain an ideal screw position (perpendicular to the iliosacral joint), to avoid occurrence of extraosseous screw misplacement, to reduce the operating time and the radiation exposure by utilizing this planning approach have not been described yet. MethodsOn preoperative CT scans of eight human cadaveric specimen individual EPs and APs were identified and transferred to the lateral fluoroscopic projection using a coordinate system with the zero-point in the center of the posterior cortex of the S1 vertebral body (x-axis parallel to upper S1 endplate). Distances were expressed in relation to the anteroposterior distance of the S1 upper endplate (in%). In each specimen on one side a screw was placed with provided EP and AP (New Technique) whereas at the contralateral side a screw was placed without given EP and AP (Conventional Technique). Both techniques were compared using postoperative CT scans to assess distances between predefined EPs and APs and the actually obtained EPs and APs, screw angulations in relation to the iliosacral joint in coronal and axial planes and the occurrence of any extraosseous screw misplacement. The “operating time (OT)” and the “time under fluoroscopy (TUF)” were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. ResultsEPs were realized significantly more accurate using the new technique in vertical direction. The screw positions in relation to the iliosacral joint showed no significant difference between both techniques. Both techniques had one aberrantly placed screw outside the safe corridor. The (mean±SD) “OT” and the (mean±SD) “TUF” were significantly decreased using the new technique compared to the conventional technique (OT: 7.6±2min versus 13.1±5.8min, p=0.012; TUF: 1.5±0.8min versus 2.2±1.1min). ConclusionThe presented preoperative planning approach increases the accuracy in percutaneous screw fixation of the iliosacral joint, reduces operating time and minimizes radiation exposure to patient and staff.

Percutaneous screw fixation of the iliosacral joint: Optimal screw pathways are frequently not completely intraosseous

IntroductionIn iliosacral screw fixation, the dimensions of solely intraosseous (secure) pathways, perpendicular to the ilio-sacral articulation (optimal) with corresponding entry (EP) and aiming points (AP) on lateral fluoroscopic projections, and the factors (demographic, anatomic) influencing these have not yet been described. MethodsIn 100 CTs of normal pelvises, the height and width of the secure and optimal pathways were measured on axial and coronal views bilaterally (total measurements: n=200). Corresponding EP and AP were defined as either the location of the screw head or tip at the crossing of lateral innominate bones’ cortices (EP) and sacral midlines (AP) within the centre of the pathway, respectively. EP and AP were transferred to the sagittal pelvic view using a coordinate system with the zero-point in the centre of the posterior cortex of the S1 vertebral body (x-axis parallel to upper S1 endplate). Distances are expressed in relation to the anteroposterior distance of the S1 upper endplate (in %). The influence of demographic (age, gender, side) and/or anatomic (PIA=pelvic incidence angle; TCA=transversal curvature angle, PID-Index=pelvic incidence distance-index; USW=unilateral sacral width-index) parameters on pathway dimensions and positions of EP and AP were assessed (multivariate analysis). ResultsThe width, height or both factors of the pathways were at least 7mm or more in 32% and 53% or 20%, respectively. The EP was on average 14±24% behind the centre of the posterior S1 cortex and 41±14% below it. The AP was on average 53±7% in the front of the centre of the posterior S1 cortex and 11±7% above it. PIA influenced the width, TCA, PID-Index the height of the pathways. PIA, PID-Index, and USW-Index significantly influenced EP and AP. Age, gender, and TCA significantly influenced EP. ConclusionSecure and optimal placement of screws of at least 7mm in diameter will be unfeasible in the majority of patients. Thoughtful preoperative planning of screw placement on CT scans is advisable to identify secure pathways with an optimal direction. For this purpose, the presented methodology of determining and transferring EPs and APs of corresponding pathways to the sagittal pelvic view using a coordinate system may be useful.