Metasomatic processes modify the composition of the subcratonic lithospheric mantle and can either form or destroy diamonds. The composition of these metasomatic agents is uncertain and has been mostly deduced from chemical zonation and overprints recorded by associated mantle silicates. Diamonds experience partial dissolution (resorption) during their residence in the mantle due to mantle metasomatism and later during their ascent in kimberlite magma. Diamonds, enclosed inside mantle xenoliths during the whole duration of ascent in kimberlite magma, can preserve their pre-kimberlite surface features, which record the last diamond-destructive metasomatic event to have occurred in the mantle. The geometry of diamond dissolution features acquired during mantle storage can provide information about diamond-destructive metasomatic events in the mantle. Diamond samples recovered from inside mantle xenoliths are extremely rare and mostly limited to eclogitic lithology, which suggests that variable resistance of different mantle lithologies to disintegration in kimberlite magma may affect representativity of these sample. Here we use whole diamond populations from exploration parcels and apply our earlier developed set of criteria to distinguish between kimberlitic and pre-kimberlitic surface features on diamonds. The study used diamonds (<1 to 4.5 mm size) from eight kimberlites in three localities: Orapa cluster, Botswana (BK1, AK15, and AK1 kimberlites), Ekati Mine, Northwest Territories, Canada (Grizzly, Leslie, Koala, and Misery kimberlites), and Snap Lake kimberlite dyke, Northwest Territories, Canada. The host kimberlites cover seven different volcaniclastic and coherent kimberlite lithologies, and our previous studies demonstrated a correlation between the style of kimberlitic resorption on diamonds and the host kimberlite lithology for these samples. From the total of 3256 studied diamonds, we identified 534 diamonds with pre-kimberlite surface textures. These pre-kimberlite surface textures display six distinct types, which are present in all the studied diamond parcels regardless of their geographic locality and host kimberlite lithology. The relative proportions of these types depend on the geographic locality showing linkage to a specific mantle source. We examined the relationship between the surface features on diamonds, their growth patterns revealed in cathodoluminescence (CL) images, the content and aggregation of nitrogen defects using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and nitrogen content in specific growth zones of diamonds obtained using secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) for 82 Ekati diamonds.Our data show that growth step-faces develop on diamonds with complex multi-crystal cores, whereas flat-faced octahedra with simple oscillatory-zoned growth patterns derive from single growth events. Initial stages of dissolution affecting only outer growth zones develop simple serrate laminae on diamonds, while more extensive dissolution exposes more complex growth zones developing various shapes of laminae and etch features (trigons and irregular asperities). The effect of internal growth patterns on dissolution features is more profound during pre-kimberlitic than kimberlite-related resorption likely due to the greater role of defects in diamond dissolution at mantle conditions.Comparison with the results of diamond dissolution experiments shows that metasomatism by C-O-H fluid is not destructive to diamond, while carbonate-silicate melt-driven metasomatism causes diamond dissolution. Continuous change in the silicate content of silicate‑carbonate melts and temperature variations within 200 °C can explain all pre-kimberlite dissolution features observed in this study. Similar pre-kimberlite dissolution features on diamonds from both the Zimbabwe and Slave cratons suggests that these metasomatic processes are widespread and affected the mantle below the eight studied kimberlites.