In this study, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) was substituted for 10%, 20%, and 30% of the sand volume in concrete. Compressive, splitting tensile, and flexural strength tests were applied to the concrete samples and stress–strain graphs were obtained. It was observed that PET substitution caused a decrease in the mechanical properties of the concrete. For this reason, the concrete with the best PET substitution rate (10%) was reinforced by wrapping it with carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) and glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP), and the same experiments were repeated. It was observed that a 10% PET substitution reduced the strength of the reference concrete by about 6%. However, wrapping the PET-substituted concrete with CFRP and GFRP increased the strength by about 1.9 and 1.5 times, respectively, surpassing that of the reference sample. In addition, this study provides a comprehensive database by bringing together experimental data from studies in which PET was used as a substitute by volume or weight instead of fine aggregate in concrete. The models proposed in this study, along with previous models, were tested for applicability. Similarly, the model suggestions in the literature for fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP)-confined concrete were tested with the experimental data in this study, and their suitability for PET-substituted concrete was discussed.
Read full abstract