After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Research Articles

Retear After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Results in Functional Outcome Deterioration Over Time

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of retear on long-term functional outcomes and glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis (OA) progression after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ASRCR). We retrospectively reviewed 201 patients who underwent ASRCR and were followed up for at least 5 years. Rotator cuff tendon structural integrity was evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging and/or ultrasonography. Pain, active range of motion, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) were evaluated for functional outcomes. To evaluate deterioration over time, the minimal clinically important difference value of pain and ASES were used. The mean follow-up period was 8.6 ± 2.2 years and overall retear rate was 21.4%. OA progression was strongly associated with retear (odds ratio 5.1, P < .001). Functional outcomes at the 2-year postoperative follow-up significantly improved compared to the preoperative status (all P < .017), regardless of retear. However, the retear group presented worse functional outcomes at the final follow-up (pain: 3.1 ± 2.6; ASES: 72.0 ± 17.4) than at the 2-year postoperative follow-up (pain: 1.2 ± 2.3, P= .014; ASES: 91.1 ± 9.9, P= .015) than the healed tendon group at final follow-up (pain:.6± 1.7; P < .001; ASES 95.5 ± 11.8; P < .001). The time for deterioration of pain (healed group vs. retear group: 5.5 ± 0.5 vs. 10.6 ± 0.4 years; P < .001) and ASES (healed group vs. retear group: 7.5 ± 0.5 vs. 12.8 ± 0.2 years; P< .001) decreased in the retear group. The functional status improved after ASRCR in short- and long-term follow-up, regardless of retear. However, retear was strongly associated with OA progression, and long-term functional outcomes deteriorated over time in retear cases, which was not observed during short-term follow-up. III, retrospective cohort study.

Retear bigger than preoperative tear size would lead to treatment failure after rotator cuff repair

This study aimed to (1) define treatment failure using the referred patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) values for pain visual analog scale (PVAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) clinical scores and (2) identify the factors that lead to patient dissatisfaction after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). We analyzed the arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery registry data from January 2015 to December 2016. Patients were followed for ≥2 years and categorized as dissatisfied or satisfied based on our own definition of treatment failure at 2 years postoperatively. For defining treatment failure, the referred PASS values for the PVAS, ASES, and SANE scores were used. Patients who failed to attain the PASS value for the PVAS, ASES, or SANE score were categorized into the dissatisfied group. Pre- and postoperative imaging and basic demographic data were compared between groups. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the factors affecting patient satisfaction at 2 years after rotator cuff repair. Of 117 patients, 30 (25.6%) were defined as the dissatisfied group (mean follow-up period, 37.5 months). Seventeen patients (14.5%) had confirmed retear on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging. In the univariate analysis, sex significantly differed between the groups (female, satisfied vs. dissatisfied groups: 39 [44.8%] vs. 22 [73.3%]; P = .010). Retear alone did not affect patient satisfaction in the univariate analysis (P = .11). Progressed retear size featured a significantly higher risk of patient dissatisfaction (P = .024; odds ratio 6.430, 95% confidence interval 1.270-32.541) in the multivariable analysis using symptom duration, sex, preoperative ASES score, preoperative tear size, retear, and progressed retear size as variables. Moreover, female sex had an increased odds for dissatisfaction (odds ratio 4.646, 95% confidence interval 1.590-13.578; P = .005). Two years after ARCR, most patients (74.4%) reported satisfaction with their outcomes. However, satisfaction levels can be altered by female sex or progressed retear size compared with the preoperative state.

Clinical and structural outcome of intra-articular steroid injection for early stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Direct comparative results of patients with early stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) with and without steroid injection are still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and structural effect of intra-articular steroid injection for early stiffness after ARCR. From 2011 and 2016, a total of 417 patients who underwent ARCR for less than medium-sized tears with 35.8 ± 22.6months follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with shoulder stiffness [forward flexion (FF) < 120˚] or pain at 2months after ARCR were performed intra-articular steroid injection, and four groups were established [+ stiffness/ + injection (SI, 158 patients), + stiffness/-injection (SNI, 92 patients), -stiffness/ + injection (NSI, 33 patients), and -stiffness/-injection (NSNI, 134 patients)]. Shoulder range-of-motion (ROM) and functional score changes for over twoyears were analyzed, and sixmonth tendon integrity were evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging. Comparing SI and SNI group, ROM (except internal rotation) and functional score changes did not differ during the early period (2-6 and 2-12months). However, comparing whether steroid injected (SI/NSI) or not (SNI/NSNI), the formers showed significantly higher improvement of both ROM and functional scores during the early and late period (2-24months). A sixmonth tendon integrity was not different across four groups and whether steroid injected or not. Intra-articular steroid injections do not appear to have a short-term clinicalimproving effect by comparing patients with stiff shoulders after ARCR with and without steroid injections. However, intra-articular steroid injection at twomonths after ARCR did not affect the tendon integrity at post-operativesixmonths.

Prognostic factors for the occurrence of post-operative shoulder stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review

BackgroundPost-operative shoulder stiffness (POSS) is one of the most frequent complications after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). Factors specifying clinical prediction models for the occurrence of POSS should rely on the literature and expert assessment. Our objective was to map prognostic factors for the occurrence of POSS in patients after an ARCR.MethodsLongitudinal studies of ARCR reporting prognostic factors for the occurrence of POSS with an endpoint of at least 6 months were included. We systematically searched Embase, Medline, and Scopus for articles published between January 1, 2014 and February 12, 2020 and screened cited and citing literature of eligible records and identified reviews. The risk of bias of included studies and the quality of evidence were assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool and an adapted Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework. A database was implemented to report the results of individual studies. The review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020199257).ResultsSeven cohort studies including 23 257 patients were included after screening 5013 records. POSS prevalence ranged from 0.51 to 8.75% with an endpoint ranging from 6 to 24 months. Due to scarcity of data, no meta-analysis could be performed. Overall risk of bias and quality of evidence was deemed high and low or very low, respectively. Twenty-two potential prognostic factors were identified. Increased age and male sex emerged as protective factors against POSS. Additional factors were reported but do require further analyses to determine their prognostic value.DiscussionAvailable evidence pointed to male sex and increased age as probable protective factors against POSS after ARCR. To establish a reliable pre-specified set of factors for clinical prediction models, our review results require complementation with an expert's opinion.

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging measurement of muscle atrophy and fatty degeneration after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

It is unclear whether muscle atrophy (MA) and fatty degeneration (FD) have improved after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). Therefore, the objective of this study was to perform quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurement to evaluate MA and FD before and after surgery. Correlations of clinical outcome with changes in MA and FD were also analyzed. From March 2013 to March 2017, 40 patients who had no re-tear up to 1year after ARCR were enrolled. MA and FD of supraspinatus muscle before surgery, at 3days after surgery, and at 1year after surgery were measured quantitatively in conventional Y-view and supraspinatus origin-view (SOV). Measurement items were muscle area (mm2), occupation ratio (%), fatty infiltration (FI, %), and fatty degenerative area (mm2). Postoperative clinical outcomes were measured at 1year after ARCR. Correlation between measure values and outcome scores were analyzed. Inter-measurement reliability was high (ICC = 0.933, Cronbach-α = 0.963). There was no significant change in MA in conventional Y-view at 1year after surgery (Occupation ratio, p = 0.2770; MA, p = 0.3049) or in SOV (MA, p = 0.5953). FI and fat area measured with the conventional method on Y-view and showed significant differences (p = 0.0001). However, FI and fat area measured with the modified method on Y-view and SOV showed no significant difference (all p > 0.05). Postoperative clinical outcomes showed significant improvement compared to preoperative ones (p = 0.0001). However, there was no significant correlation between FD and FA (p = 0.653). Quantitative MRI measurement was shown to be a reliable and valid method. MA and FD do not improve after ARCR considering postoperative anatomical changes of supraspinatus at 1-year follow-up. FD of the supraspinatus in conventional Y-view, but not in SOV, showed a significant change at 1year postoperatively. MA showed no significant improvement. There was no correlation between improvement in clinical scores and changes in FD and MA.

A high acromion-greater tuberosity impingement index increases the risk of retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

No evaluation has been done on the relationship of the acromion-greater tuberosity impingement index (ATI) with retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). Our purpose was to evaluate whether a higher ATI is associated with retear after ARCR. 132 patients received ARCR and underwent MRI scan at a oneyear follow-up to assess tendon healing, and the findings were graded no retear (NR), partial-thickness retear (PR) or full-thickness retear (FR). The ATI, the critical shoulder angle (CSA), acromion index (AI) and lateral acromial angle (LAA) were measured with postoperative radiographs. Functional scores were obtained preoperatively and at a oneyear follow-up. Postoperative Constant scores and ASES scores were significantly different between groups with inferior outcomes in the FR group (p < 0.05 for all). The UCLA score was significantly better in the NR group compared with the PR and FR groups (p < 0.05), and in the PR group compared with the FR group (p < 0.05). For ATI and CSA, the values of the PR and FR groups were larger than the NR group (p < 0.05 for all), but there were no significant differences between the PR and FR groups (p > 0.05 for all). No significant differences were observed with regard to the AI and LAA (p > 0.05, respectively). The repair integrity was positively related to the ATI (0.304, p < 0.05) and CSA (0.252, p < 0.05), but not related to the AI or LAA (p > 0.05 for both). ATI was not related to any functional scores (p > 0.05 for all). This study revealed that the ATI was positively related to rotator cuff retear. Patients with retears had significantly greater ATIs after ARCR. Level of Evidence: III, case-control study.

The effect of watching shoulder ROM changes on functional outcome and quality of life following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of watching video records of their shoulder motion changes on functional outcomes and quality of life after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). Methods The patients were divided into two groups. In Group 1, video records of pre- and postoperative shoulder motions were recorded and showed. In Group 2, no video was showed to the patients. In Group 1, the first postoperative evaluation was done before video watching, and the second evaluation was done just after watching video records. In Group 2, the first and second postoperative measurements were performed with 10-20days interval. The Constant Murley score (CS), the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) score, and active shoulder range of motion (ROM) values were used as an outcome tool. Results A total of 196 patients (Group 1; 76 patients and Group 2; 120 patients) with a mean age of 62.06 ± 7.17 years were included. There was a significant improvement in postoperative scores of SF-36 subscales (except emotional well-being and energy/fatigue), ASES, CM scores, and joint ROM values when compared to preoperative values for both groups (p < .001). The first postoperative outcomes were similar between groups (p > .05). In the second postoperative evaluation, emotional role functioning, energy/fatigue, emotional well-being, health change subscales of SF-36, and ASES scores were significantly higher in Group 1 compared with Group 2 (p < .05). Conclusion When patients watch the pre- and postoperative video records of their shoulder ROM after ARCR, patients' satisfaction and well-being perception increase in the short-term despite unchanged shoulder ROM.

The Opioid Risk Tool: Can This Validated Tool Predict Post-Operative Opioid Dependence Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair?

Numerous attempts have been made to decrease the incidence of opioid dependence after orthopedic surgeries. However, no effective means of preoperative risk stratification currently exists. The purpose of this study was to determine the ability of the Opioid Risk Tool (ORT) to predict the rate of opioid dependence 2 years after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). We prospectively evaluated all patients undergoing primary ARCR at a single institution over a 1.5 year period with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. All patients completed the ORT prior to surgery and were stratified into Low, Moderate, and High risk categories. The primary outcome was postoperative opioid dependence, defined as receiving a minimum of 6 opioid prescriptions within 2 years following surgery. Secondary outcomes included the total number of morphine milligram equivalents prescribed, total number of opioid prescriptions filled, and total number of opioid pills prescribed during this time interval. All outcome variables were compared amongst Low, Moderate, and High risk groups. Assessment of a statistical correlation between each outcome variable and individual numerical ORT scores (1-9) was performed. A total of 137 patients were included for analysis. No statistically significant difference was noted in any primary or secondary outcome variable when compared between Low, Moderate, and High risk groups. The total cohort demonstrated a 19% rate of post-operative opioid dependence. No correlation was identified between any outcome variable and individual numerical ORT scores. A greater rate of dependence and quantity of opioids prescribed was noted amongst patients with a history of prior opioid use. The ORT was not predictive of the risk of opioid dependence or quantity of opioids prescribed after ARCR. Attention should be focused on alternative means of identification and management of patients at risk for opioid dependence after orthopedic procedures, including those with a history of prior opioid use.

Risk factors affecting rotator cuff retear after arthroscopic repair: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) consistently challenges medical staff and patients, and the incidence of retear after surgery is 10%-94%. The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors that cause retear after ARCR and provide theoretical guidance for clinical intervention to reduce the occurrence of postoperative rotator cuff retear. The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021225088). PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for observational studies on risk factors for rotator cuff retear after arthroscopic repair. Meta-analytical methods were used to determine the odds ratio or weighted mean difference of potential risk factors related to postoperative rotator cuff retear. Stata 15.1 was used to quantitatively evaluate the publication bias of the statistical results. Fourteen studies from 6 countries with a total of 5693 patients were included. The meta-analysis revealed that the risk factors for retear after rotator cuff repair were age, body mass index, diabetes, subscapularis and infraspinatus fatty infiltration, symptom duration, bone mineral density, tear length, tear width, tear size area, amount of retraction, critical shoulder angle, acromiohumeral interval, distance from the musculotendinous junction to the glenoid, operative duration, biceps procedure, and postoperative University of California Los Angeles shoulder score. These findings can help clinical medical staff identify patients who are prone to retear early after arthroscopic repair and develop targeted prevention and treatment strategies for modifiable risk factors, which are of great significance for reducing the occurrence of rotator cuff retear after ARCR.

Effects of steroid injection during rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

BackgroundThis study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of steroid injections during the rehabilitation period after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ACRC).MethodsAmong patients who underwent ARCR, 117 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled. Pain and range of motion (ROM) recovery at the 3-, 6-, and 24-month follow-up visits and functional outcome at the 24-month follow-up were compared between 45 patients who received ultrasound-guided subacromial steroid injection at postoperative week 4 or 6 and 72 patients who did not. Functional outcome was assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and Constant score. Healing of the repaired tendon and retear were observed at the 6-month follow-up via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) arthrography.ResultsAt the 3-month follow-up, the steroid injection group showed lower visual analog scale scores than the control group (p<0.05) and showed faster recovery of forward flexion and internal rotation (p<0.05). From the 6-month follow-up, the two groups did not show differences in pain and ROM, and the ASES score and Constant score also did not significantly differ at the 24-month follow-up. The two groups did not differ in retear rate as determined by MRI or CT arthrography at the 6-month follow-up.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that ultrasound-guided subacromial steroid injection at 4 or 6 weeks after ARCR leads to quick pain reduction and ROM recovery until 3 months after surgery. Therefore, subacromial steroid injection is speculated to be an effective and relatively safe method to assist rehabilitation.

Trabecular Bone Score Could Not Predict the Bone Mineral Density of Proximal Humerus.

BackgroundOsteoporosis is an important clinical factor for tendon healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). Conventional dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the hip and lumbar spine (LS) does not represent proximal humeral bone mineral density (BMD). Theoretically, direct measurement of the BMD of the proximal humerus is the best method; however, it is not popular and is non-standardized. Therefore, we evaluate whether the trabecular bone score (TBS) using LS DXA would represent proximal humeral BMD.MethodsConventional hip and LS DXA and proximal humeral BMD were measured in 212 consecutive ARCR patients, and TBS was calculated using LS DXA. Comparative analysis between the affected and contralateral asymptomatic shoulders was done; moreover, correlation analysis was conducted to evaluate the representativity of TBS for proximal humeral BMD. Regression analysis was performed to elucidate the risk factor of intraoperative suture anchor failure (ISAF).ResultsBMDs of the affected shoulder were significantly lower than those of the contralateral side (all P<0.05). TBS failed to present a strong correlation with proximal humeral BMD (correlation coefficients 0.155–0.506, all P<0.05), and the BMD of the greater tuberosity (GT) of the proximal humerus was revealed to be a sole risk factor for ISAF (odds ratio, 0.01, P=0.020).ConclusionsTBS and conventional hip and LS DXA did not represent proximal humeral BMD. Furthermore, among the various radiological measurements, the BMD of the GT was a sole risk factor of ISAF. Therefore, further research for the direct measurement of proximal humeral BMD is mandatory to predict proximal humeral focal osteoporosis.

Risk factors related to complications of the fingers and hand after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair - carpal tunnel syndrome, flexor tenosynovitis, and complex regional pain syndrome.

Hypothesis/BackgroundComplications involving the fingers and hand after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) include complex regional pain syndrome, carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), and flexor tenosynovitis (TS). The aims of this study were to diagnose the complications after ARCR and investigate the risk factors that could predispose individuals to these finger and hand complications.MethodsFifty patients (50 shoulders) who underwent ARCR participated in this study. The patients’ ages ranged from 36 to 84 years (mean, 63 years). Before ARCR, we determined the disease history of the fingers and hand (CTS or TS) and subjectively assessed their symptoms using a questionnaire that included a scale ranging from 1 (no symptoms or no disability) to 5 (the worst symptoms or severest disability). ARCR was performed in all patients using suture anchors. The mean observation period after surgery was 15.5 months (range, 12-48 months). We diagnosed complications involving the fingers and hand after ARCR and investigated the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative risk factors that could predispose patients to these complications using univariable and multivariable analyses.ResultsAfter ARCR, 20 patients (20 hands) (40%) had complications of the fingers and hand. Among them, the diagnosis was CTS in 2 hands, TS in 15 hands, and both CTS and TS in 3 hands. None of the hands exhibited complex regional pain syndrome. These complications occurred at an average of 1.8 months (range, 0.1-4 months) after ARCR. In the 47 patients who did not have symptoms just before the operation, both univariable and multivariable analyses between the complication group (n = 17) and the no-complications group (n = 30) showed a significant difference in the presence of a past history of CTS or TS (complication frequency: past history: 88%, no past history: 25%) (P < .05) and the preoperative subjective assessment for edema of the fingers and hand (complication frequency: edema ≥ 2 points: 89%, edema < 2 points: 24%) (P < .05). There were no relationships between the other candidate intraoperative and postoperative factors and complications.ConclusionIn all 20 hands with complications of the fingers and hand after ARCR, the diagnosis was CTS or TS. Complications of the fingers and hand after ARCR easily occurred in patients with a past history of CTS or TS and in patients with edema as per a subjective assessment. We speculate that the ARCR triggered the occurrence of CTS and TS postoperatively in patients who had subclinical CTS or TS before surgery.

Clinical outcomes in patients with retear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A meta-analysis

BackgroundRotator cuff retear is a major concern after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR); however, the effects of retear remain unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes of postoperative retear and intact tendons after ARCR. MethodsWe searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and PEDro databases for studies performed from January 2000 to June 2020. Clinical outcomes included the Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, University of California Los Angeles shoulder (UCLA) score, pain score, range of motion, and muscle strength. Meta-analysis using random-effects models was performed on the pooled results to determine significance. ResultsThe initial database search yielded 3141 records. After removal of duplicates, 26 of which met the inclusion criteria. Patients in the retear group had significantly lower Constant score [− 8.51 points (95% CI, − 10.29 to − 6.73); P < 0.001], ASES score [− 12.53 points (95% CI, − 16.27 to − 8.79); P < 0.001], UCLA score [− 3.77 points (95% CI, − 4.72 to − 2.82); P < 0.001], and significantly higher pain score [0.56 cm (95% CI, 0.10 to 1.01); P = 0.02] than the intact group. In addition, the retear group had significantly lower flexion [− 10.46° (95% CI, − 19.86 to − 1.07); P = 0.03], abduction [− 14.84° (95% CI, − 28.55 to − 1.14); P = 0.03], and external rotation [− 7.22° (95% CI, − 13.71 to − 0.74); P = 0.03] range of motion, and flexion [− 1.65 kg·f (95% CI, − 2.29 to − 1.01); P < 0.001], abduction [− 1.87 kg·f (95% CI, − 3.02 to − 0.72); P = 0.001], and external rotation [− 1.66 kg·f (95% CI, − 3.25 to − 0.07); P = 0.04] muscle strength. ConclusionOur results suggest that retear after ARCR leads to poor clinical outcomes after surgery.

Prediction of Shoulder Stiffness After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Background: Postoperative shoulder stiffness (POSS) is a prevalent adverse event after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) that is associated with major limitations in everyday activities and prolonged rehabilitation. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to develop a predictive model for determining the risk of POSS within 6 months after primary ARCR. We hypothesized that sufficient discrimination ability of such a model could be achieved using a local institutional database. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Consecutive primary ARCRs documented in a local clinical registry between 2013 and 2017 were included, and patients who experienced POSS before the final clinical 6-month follow-up were identified. A total of 29 prognostic factor candidates were considered, including patient-related factors (n = 7), disease-related factors (n = 9), rotator cuff integrity factors (n = 6), and operative details (n = 7). We used imputed data for the primary analysis, and a sensitivity analysis was conducted using complete case data. Logistic regression was applied to develop a model based on clinical relevance and statistical criteria. To avoid overfitting in the multivariable model, highly correlated predictors were not included together in any model. A final prognostic model with a maximum of 8 prognostic factors was considered. The model’s predictive accuracy was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Internal validation was performed using bootstrapping. Results: Of 1330 ARCR cases (N = 1330 patients), 112 (8.4%) patients had POSS. Our final model had a moderate predictive ability with an AUC of 0.67. The predicted risks of POSS ranged from 2.3% to 38.9% and were significantly higher in women; patients with partial tears, low baseline passive shoulder abduction, and lack of tendon degeneration; and when no acromioplasty was performed. Conclusion: A prognostic model for POSS was developed for patients with ARCR, offering a personalized risk evaluation to support the future decision process for surgery and rehabilitation.

Associations of Hypo-High-Density Lipoproteinemia with Increments of Preoperative Rotator Cuff Tear Size and with Postoperative Retear

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether any dyslipidemia is associated with the increments of preoperative tear size and with structural integrity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR).

Association of Recurrent Tear After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair and Superoxide-Induced Oxidative Stress

Background: Recurrent tears after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) remain a significant clinical problem. Oxidative stress contributes to the degeneration of the rotator cuff, and a degenerative rotator cuff can lead to recurrent tear after ARCR. However, the correlation between oxidative stress and retear after ARCR is unclear. Purpose: To investigate the correlation between superoxide-induced oxidative stress and recurrent tear after ARCR. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 68 patients who underwent ARCR using a suture-bridge technique participated in this study. Specimens were collected from the edge of the torn tendon during surgery. The modified Bonar score was used to evaluate degeneration of the rotator cuff on histological specimens, and fluorescence intensity on dihydroethidium (DHE) staining was used to detect oxidative stress. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzyme activity was also measured. The following were used for clinical evaluation: age, tear size on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before surgery, Goutallier classification on MRI before surgery, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association score before and 6 months after surgery. After the repaired rotator cuffs were evaluated on MRI 6 months after surgery, the patients were divided into groups: those with a healed rotator cuff (healed group; n = 46) and those with a recurrent tear (retear group; n = 22). The significant differences between the groups were determined with regard to clinical evaluation, modified Bonar score, DHE intensity, and SOD activity. In addition, multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate risk factors for recurrent tear. Results: Age, tear size, Goutallier classification, modified Bonar score, DHE intensity, and SOD activity were significantly greater in the retear group than in the healed group, although the Japanese Orthopaedic Association score was not significantly different. Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that age, tear size, and SOD activity were significantly correlated with recurrent tear. Conclusion: In addition to tear size and age, superoxide-induced oxidative stress may be an exacerbating factor for retear after ARCR.

Multimodal nerve injection provides noninferior analgesic efficacy compared with interscalene nerve block after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

This randomized noninferiority trial aimed to evaluate whether combined suprascapular, axillary nerve, and the articular branch of lateral pectoral nerve block (3NB) is noninferior to interscalene nerve block (ISB) for pain control after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ASRCR). Eighty-five patients undergoing ASRCR were randomized to either 3NB (n = 43) or ISB (n = 42) group. We used 5 and 15 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine for each nerve in the 3NB and ISB groups, respectively. The primary outcome was the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at 4 h postoperatively measured assessed on an 11-point scale (ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain) that was analyzed using noninferiority testing. The secondary outcome was VAS pain scores in the recovery room and at 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 h postoperatively. Rebound pain, IV-PCA usage during 48 h, dyspnea, muscle weakness, and satisfaction were evaluated. Regarding the primary outcome, the mean difference in VAS pain scores between the 3NB (2.5 ± 1.6) and ISB (2.2 ± 2.3) groups at 4 h postoperatively was 0.3, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of -0.56 to 1.11. The upper limit of 95% CI is lower than the noninferiority margin of 1.3 (p < 0.001). At all other time points, except in the recovery room, 3NB showed noninferior to ISB. Rebound pain, IV-PCA usage during the second 24 h, and muscle weakness were lower in the 3NB group (all p < 0.005). The satisfaction was similar in both groups (p = 0.815). Combined 3NB is noninferior to ISB in terms of pain control after ASRCR; and is associated with low levels of rebound pain, IV-PCA usage, and muscle weakness. Randomized controlled trial, Level I.

Do Relaxation Exercises Decrease Pain After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Pain after rotator cuff repair is commonly managed with opioid medications; however, these medications are associated with serious adverse effects. Relaxation exercises represent a potential nonpharmacologic method of pain management that can be easily implemented without substantial adverse effects; however, the effects of relaxation exercises have not been studied in a practical, reproducible protocol after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. (1) Does performing relaxation exercises after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) decrease pain compared with standard pain management medication? (2) Does performing relaxation exercises after ARCR decrease opioid consumption? (3) What proportion of patients who used the relaxation techniques believed they decreased their pain level, and what proportion continued using these techniques at 2 weeks? (4) Does performing relaxation exercises after ARCR affect shoulder function? During the study period, 563 patients were eligible for inclusion; however, only 146 were enrolled, randomized, and postoperatively followed (relaxation group: 74, control group: 72); 68% (384 of 563) of patients were not contacted due to patient and research staff availability. Thirty-three patients were unenrolled preoperatively or immediately postoperatively due to change in operative procedure (such as, only debridement) or patient request; no postoperative data were collected from these patients. Follow-up proportions were similar between the relaxation and control groups (relaxation: 80%, control: 81%; p = 0.90). The relaxation group received and reviewed educational materials consisting of a 5-minute video and an educational pamphlet explaining relaxation breathing techniques, while the control group did not receive relaxation education materials. Patients recorded their pain levels and opioid consumption during the 5 days after ARCR. Patients also completed the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score preoperatively and 2, 6, 13, 18, and 26 weeks postoperatively. Linear mixed models were created to analyze postoperative pain, opioid consumption measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), and shoulder function outcomes. A per-protocol approach was used to correct for patients who were enrolled but subsequently underwent other procedures. There was no difference in pain scores between the relaxation and control groups during the first 5 days postoperatively. There was no difference in pain scores at 2 weeks postoperatively between the relaxation and control groups (3.3 ± 3 versus 3.5 ± 2, mean difference -0.22 [95% CI -1.06 to 0.62]; p = 0.60). There was no difference in opioid consumption during the first 5 days postoperatively between the relaxation and control groups. The use of relaxation exercises resulted in lower 2-week narcotics consumption in the relaxation group than in the control group (309 ± 241 MMEs versus 442 ± 307 MMEs, mean difference -133 [95% CI -225 to -42]; p < 0.01). Sixty-two percent (41 of 66) of patients in the relaxation group believed the relaxation exercises decreased their pain levels. Fifty-two percent (34 of 66) were still performing the exercises at 2 weeks postoperatively. During the 6-month follow-up period, there was no difference in shoulder function between the relaxation and control groups. The preoperative administration of quick, basic relaxation exercises allowed patients to use appreciably lower opioid analgesic doses over the first 2 weeks after ARCR, without any worsening of pain scores. We consider this result promising but preliminary; it is possible that a more intense mindfulness intervention-the one we studied here was disseminated using only a 5-minute video-would deliver reductions in pain and further reductions in opioid usage. Level II, therapeutic study.

Poor Prognostic Factors in Patients With Rotator Cuff Retear

Background:The treatment for retears after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) has long been a challenge.Purpose:This study aimed to (1) summarize the characteristics of patients with a retear after primary ARCR and (2) determine the risk factors for poor clinical outcomes after a retear.Study Design:Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:We collected the data of patients with a retear after primary ARCR between January 2011 and December 2016. There were 45 patients with retears included (19 men [42.2%] and 26 women [57.8%]; mean ± SD age, 63.11 ± 8.87 years). Initially, the demographic and outcome data of patients with a retear were analyzed. Patients were classified into good and poor outcome groups according to their overall satisfaction at final follow-up. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the factors for poor clinical outcomes after a retear.Results:A total of 31 patients were classified into the good outcome group, and 14 patients were classified into the poor outcome group. Both the good and the poor outcome groups showed that clinical scores significantly improved at the time of the retear diagnosis, but the final scores were maintained or worse compared with scores at the time of the retear diagnosis. Final range of motion (ROM), except external rotation in the good outcome group, was worse or had no significant change compared with ROM at the time of the retear diagnosis. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, current smoking (odds ratio [OR], 45.580 [95% CI, 3.014-689.274]; P = .006), female sex (OR, 32.774 [95% CI, 2.433-441.575]; P = .009), and retears of the same or larger size than the initial tear (OR, 10.261 [95% CI, 1.544-68.202]; P = .016) showed a higher OR for poor clinical outcomes after a retear.Conclusion:Smoking, female sex, and retears of the same or larger size than the initial tear were independent risk factors for poor clinical outcomes after a rotator cuff retear. Final clinical scores and ROM were similar or worse compared with the scores and ROM at the time of the retear diagnosis. Therefore, revision surgery should be actively considered in female patients or those who smoke with poor clinical outcomes and a larger retear size than the preoperative tear size at the time of the retear diagnosis.

Effect of Smoking on Postoperative Function and Quality of Life After Full Thickness Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Retrospective Analysis.

The effect of smoking on preoperative and postoperative outcome scores as well as quality of life measurements after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) has not been fully understood, and studies regarding this are lacking in the literature. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of smoking on function and quality of life after ARCR. Two-hundred patients who underwent full-thickness ARCR with a minimum 1-year follow-up period were included and evaluated retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups: smokers (Group 1, 59 patients) and nonsmokers (Group 2, 141 patients). Pre- and postoperative Constant Murley (CM) scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, visual analogue scale scores (VASs), and Short-Form 36 health survey (SF-36) scores were used to evaluate functional and quality of life outcomes. The correlation between the smoking amount (pack-years) and outcomes was evaluated. A total of 200 patients included into study (90 male and 110 female) with mean age of 62.68 ± 3.98. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding preoperative scores, except in the ASES score (P = 0.021 Additionally, there was a statistically significant difference between the groups regarding postoperative CM score, ASES score, and VAS, and in physical functioning and role limitations due to physical health domains of the SF-36 (P = 0.029, P = 0.038, P = 0.021 and P = 0.020, respectively). There were small to moderate negative correlations between amount of smoking and preoperative physical functioning, role limitations from emotional problems, energy/fatigue, emotional well-being, and pain domains of the SF-36. However, there were moderate to strong negative correlations between amount of smoking and postoperative SF-36 domains. Preoperative and postoperative functional outcome scores, and quality of life measurements are negatively affected from smoking. As the amount of smoking increases, postoperative results are negatively affected. 3.