ACL Reconstruction Research Articles

Biomechanic pattern of knees after ACL reconstruction

Biomechanic pattern of knees after ACL reconstruction

Countermovement jump reveals decreased functional outcome despite subjective improvement after ACL reconstruction

Countermovement jump reveals decreased functional outcome despite subjective improvement after ACL reconstruction

Associated ACL Reconstruction and Meniscal Repair do not Affect the Evolution of Isokinetic Parameters in Professional Athletes: A Prospective Study with a One-Year Follow-Up

Associated ACL Reconstruction and Meniscal Repair do not Affect the Evolution of Isokinetic Parameters in Professional Athletes: A Prospective Study with a One-Year Follow-Up

Countermovement jump and vertical hop demonstrate braking/deceleration and performance alterations after ACL reconstruction with BMA, DBM, and suture tape augmentation

ObjectivesThis study evaluated countermovement jump and Single Leg Jump measures to identify landing measures that best distinguish a novel Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction technique using bone marrow aspirate, demineralized bone matrix, and suture tape augmentation patients from controls. The secondary objective assessed performance differences between operated and non-operated limbs post-reconstruction. The hypothesis was that novel Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction patients at return to sport would not differ from controls during landing and that the operated limb's performance would not differ from the unoperated limb. MethodsThe study included 31 patients with the novel reconstruction technique matched with controls in a 1:10 ratio based on age, sex, weight, and height. Both groups underwent screening and were compared during a Countermovement Jump. Using a Sparta Science Force Platform, each patient's unoperated and operated limbs were also compared for Single Leg Jump post-op (6.5 months). ResultsTest patients showed no difference in center of pressure during landing of both jumps compared to controls (P=0.27) and the uninvolved limb (P=0.26). Test patients exhibited increased braking impulse relative to the uninvolved limb during Single Leg Jump (P<0.001). Deceleration upon landing of Countermovement Jump was also increased compared to controls (P<0.001). Test patients demonstrated slower concentric time during a Countermovement Jump compared to controls (P=0.03) and significantly slower compared to the uninjured leg (P<0.001). Countermovement Jump height was decreased compared to controls (P<0.001). Single-leg jump height was decreased in the injured limb compared to the uninjured limb (P<0.001). ConclusionsTest patients did not show significant differences in landing motion compared to controls or the uninvolved leg. However, power and performance alterations were evident at Return to Sport after reconstruction. Although these results are quite promising, they may be too preliminary to draw definitive conclusions. Double and single-legged assessments should be considered in return-to-sport decision-making.

Increased rate of surgery for loss of motion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during COVID-19

ObjectivesTo investigate the incidence and risk factors associated with loss of motion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic (COVID-19). MethodsA retrospective review of patients undergoing primary ACLR between March 2017 and November 2022 by a senior high-volume orthopaedic surgeon was performed. Exclusion criteria included revision ACLR, multiligamentous knee surgery, and age <14 years. The COVID-19 group was categorized according to the United States Centers for Disease Control Public Health Emergency declaration dates (January 31, 2020–May 11, 2023). To minimize confounding variables associated with the early stages of COVID-19, patients who underwent ACLR between December 1, 2019 and February 29, 2020 were excluded. Loss of motion was defined using the International Knee Documentation Committee criteria for loss of motion of the knee (i.e. an extension deficit >5° or flexion deficit >15° compared to the contralateral knee) 3–12 months after ACLR or as requiring surgery to restore motion within 12 months of ACLR. ResultsA total of 336 individuals who underwent 352 primary ACLRs (164 pre-COVID-19, 188 during COVID-19) were included (mean age: 25.2 ​± ​10.6 years, 44% female). The overall rate of postoperative loss of motion was 15% (n = 53), and 9% (n = 31) required surgery to restore motion within 12 months of ACLR. More patients underwent surgery for loss of motion during COVID-19 compared to pre-COVID-19, which was statistically significant (12% (n = 23) vs 5% (n = 8), respectively, P = 0.02). However, a statistically significant difference in the rate of loss of motion was not detected (18% (n = 33) vs 12% (n = 20), respectively, P = 0.16). A statistically significant increased median time from injury to ACLR was observed during COVID-19 compared to pre-COVID-19 (55 vs 37 days, P <0.01). More patients were unable to achieve terminal extension (0°) at minimum 9 months postoperatively during COVID-19 compared to pre-COVID-19 (10% vs 3%, P = 0.04) and motion was worse at this interval (0°–136° vs −2°–138°, P <0.01). ConclusionSurgery for loss of motion following ACLR was more common during COVID-19. Decreased access to elective medical care, changed activity level, psychological effects, or COVID-19 itself may explain the increased rate of surgery for loss of motion during COVID-19. Level of evidenceCase series; level IV.

Functional Outcomes and Return to Sport of Combined ACL Reconstruction and Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis in High-Pivot Kabbadi Players: A Prospective Cohort Study of 93 Elite Players

Functional Outcomes and Return to Sport of Combined ACL Reconstruction and Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis in High-Pivot Kabbadi Players: A Prospective Cohort Study of 93 Elite Players

Development and validation of a novel method for assessing physical activity profiles after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: The Sports and Physical Activity scale

ObjectivesTo describe and evaluate the preliminary validity of a novel scoring system for assessing the physical activity of patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. MethodsThe Sports and Physical Activity (SPA) scale consists of thirty options of sports and physical activities, followed by four frequency options for each option selected. Factors used to develop the scoring system were frequency of participation and intensity of the sports or physical activities. Possible scores ranged from a low of 0 to a high of 24. The scale was assessed for validity and responsiveness. ResultsThe study cohort included 418 primary ACL reconstructed patients 2 years after surgery, and a subgroup of 183 patient 5 years after surgery. The mean and median SPA scores for the cohort were 12.35 ( ​± ​6.95) and 12, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the scores of men and women (U ​= ​21,541.0, p ​= ​0.921). The SPA scale had a small but statistically significant inverse correlation with age (rs ​= ​−0.2, p = <0.001), indicating divergent validity. Patients who had returned to sport had a statistically significantly higher score (U ​= ​21593.5, p = <0.001), and there was a statistically significant difference between scores of the three current sports status groups (H ​= ​19.99, p value = <0.001) indicating convergent validity. Construct validity was indicated with a statistically significant correlation with the Marx scale (rs ​= ​0.422, p value= <0.001). In a subgroup (n ​= ​183) of the patient sample, comparison between scores at 2-years (13.27 ​± ​7.02) and 5-years (12.11 ​± ​7.88) found a statistically significant decline (p= <0.001). However, this decline was smaller than the decline seen in the Marx score between 2 and 5 years (11.11 ​± ​4.07 and 9.30 ​± ​4.52 p= <0.001). ConclusionPreliminary validity was found for the SPA scale. Women and men were found to be participating in a similar amount of activity 2 years post ACL reconstruction, despite return to sport differences between men and women being well documented. The scores of the SPA scale showed a statistically significant decrease over time with a negligible effect size. Level of evidenceIII.

Physical, psychological, and environmental shifts experienced during the young athlete journey after ACL reconstruction

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to explore self-perceived changes in athlete journey trajectory, or shifts, after ACLR that facilitate or hinder physical activity participation among youth. MethodsTen participants were included in this study at a median of 5.9 years after adolescent ACLR. Using an interpretive phenomenological methodology, semi-structured interviews with each participant were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data collection focused on participants’ lived experiences of reintegration to physical activity after ACLR. Thematic analyses were guided by the procedures of the constant comparative method. ResultsNineteen distinct shifts were identified from participants’ perspectives, categorized into the main classification scheme of 1) environmental shifts (extrinsic demands, built environment, social network), 2) psychological shifts (expectations, motivation, meaning of sports, accountability, priorities, athlete identity, mental health, confidence, knowledge, character, participation mentality), and 3) physical shifts (movement competence, sport participation, physical activity, normalization, knee health). Factors perceived to induce shifts were categorized as natural, injury-driven, or life transition-driven. ConclusionIn the years following adolescent ACLR, young athletes experience physical, psychological, and environment shifts that impact physical activity participation. These findings provide important insight for future work that aims to optimize physical activity outcomes after an injury-related disruption in the athlete journey.

A machine learning system for artificial ligaments with desired mechanical properties in ACL reconstruction applications

The anterior cruciate ligament is one of the important tissues to maintain the stability of the human knee joint, but it is difficult for this ligament to self-heal after injury. Consequently, transplantation of artificial ligaments (ALs) has gained widespread attention as an important alternative treatment method in recent years. However, accurately predicting the intricate mechanical properties of ALs remains a formidable challenge, particularly when employing theoretical frameworks such as braiding theory. This obstacle presents a significant impediment to achieving optimal AL design. Therefore, in this study, a high-precision machine learning model based on an artificial neural network was developed to rapidly and accurately predict the mechanical properties of ALs. The results showed that the proposed model achieved a reduction of 45.22% and 50.17% in the normalized root mean square error on the testing set when compared to traditional machine learning models (Random Forest and Support Vector Machine), demonstrating its higher accuracy. In addition, the design of ALs with desired mechanical properties was achieved by optimizing the braiding parameters, and its effectiveness was verified through experiments. The mechanical properties of the prepared ALs were able to fully meet the desired targets and were at least 2% higher. Finally, the influence weights of different braiding parameters on the mechanical properties of ALs were analyzed by feature importance.

In the medium term, more than half of males report kinesiophobia after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

ObjectivesAnterior cruciate ligament rupture is a serious trauma with long-term consequences for the patient. Psychological and physiological factors may negatively affect patient recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), and development of kinesiophobia is possible. The aim of this study was to examine the presence of kinesiophobia and lower-leg muscle strength recovery in both sexes after ACLR. Methods140 ACLR patients agreed to participate in the study. Kinesiophobia was assessed using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK). The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) were used for patient-related outcome measurements. In both legs quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength at 60°/s and 180°/s were measured with an isokinetic dynamometer. For dynamic balance and leg function, the Y-balance test and single-leg hop test were used. Results100 (71%) males and 40 (29%) females—mean age 32.5 (±8.3)—were examined 5.5 (±1.25) years after ACLR. 68/140 patients (48.6%) reported a TSK kinesiophobia score equal to or higher than 37 points: 54/100 (54%) males and 14/40 (35%) females (p ​= ​0.04). Patients with kinesiophobia had significantly lower KOOS values (p ​< ​0.001). In terms of the TAS no significant differences were found between those with or without kinesiophobia. Knee strength deficiency at 180°/sec and 60°/sec was significantly higher in the kinesiophobia group in knee extension in males (p ​= ​0.009) and knee flexion in females (p ​= ​0.001). Normalized body weight isokinetic average peak torque strength tests were significantly better in males compared to females in both groups (p ​< ​0.001). ConclusionBoth sexes reported high rates of kinesiophobia, but males are at higher risk of developing kinesiophobia than females in the medium term after ACLR. Furthermore, patients with kinesiophobia have significantly lower total KOOS scores, and females were significantly weaker than males in knee flexion and extension according to normalized body weight muscle strength tests. Also, a longer time from injury to surgery increases the risk of kinesiophobia in females. Level of evidenceLevel IV. Type of studyRetrospective case series study. Clinical trial registrationTrial registration in ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT05762809.

Crossover effect of knee and ankle joint training on knee mechanics after ACL reconstruction: A randomized controlled trial

BackgroundAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rehabilitation is a common intervention after ACL reconstruction. Since different types of exercise can influence muscle and kinematic parameters in diverse ways, the training order between the knee and ankle joints may also change gait parameters. PurposeThis study aimed to investigate whether the training sequence of the knee and ankle joints (knee followed by ankle training or vice-versa) in an ACL reconstruction (ACLR) rehabilitation program has any effects on knee extension and flexion torques. MethodsForty-two men (aged 20–30 years) with ACLR participated in this study. They were randomly allocated to receive one of two interventions: (A) knee joint training followed by ankle training or (B) ankle joint training followed by knee training. After five weeks (four weeks of intervention and one-week washout), participants crossed from one group to another for an additional four weeks. Knee extension and flexion torques were assessed during the stance phase of the gait cycle before and after the intervention program. ResultsTwo-way Mixed-design MANOVA showed that knee extension torque improved significantly in both groups after training (p = 0.001, Cohen’s D = 0.65), while the knee flexion torque increased significantly only in group B (p= 0.001, Cohen’s D = 0.97). When comparing both groups, patients of group B presented significant improvements in the post-training mean values of all tested variables compared with group A. ConclusionStarting a post-ACLR rehabilitation program with ankle training followed by knee training is better to improve knee flexion and extension torques during the stance phase of the gait cycle than starting the program by training the knee first, followed by the ankle. Future studies using a mixed-gender sample and different types of ACLR operations are necessary to examine whether similar improvements will happen as well as to test their effects on many sports activities.

Presoaking hamstring autograft with vancomycin does not jeopardize its biomechanical properties, including graft elongation, after cyclic loading.

Presoaking the graft with vancomycin before implantation has been shown to reduce the risk of postoperative infection after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, the effects of presoaking on the graft biomechanical properties remain unclear. This study aimed to determine whether presoaking the graft with vancomycin affects the graft biomechanical properties and length after cyclic loading. Ten paired (20 specimens) gracilis and semitendinous tendons were harvested from fresh-frozen human cadaveric specimens. Two tendons were folded in half to make four strands, and the grafts were randomized into the vancomycin and control groups. The graft was exposed to the antibiotic solution for 15 min (5 mg/mL) and prepared by mixing 1 g of vancomycin with 200 mL of normal saline (NaCl 0.9%). The control group was soaked in normal saline for 15 min. The prepared grafts were attached to the actuator of a dynamic tensile-testing machine. All grafts were tested with 3000 cycles of cyclic loading followed by a pull-to-failure. The cyclic loading protocol consisted of position and load control blocks to simulate the graft in vivo in the postoperative phase after ACLR. Presoaking in vancomycin did not jeopardize the biomechanical properties of the graft. In addition, presoaking with vancomycin did not elongate the grafts. No significant differences were found in the mean Young's modulus and the mean total elongation of the graft of the specimen between the vancomycin group and the control group. Presoaking the graft with vancomycin jeopardized neither its biomechanical properties nor elongation even after cyclic loading in this in vitro study. It is suggested that vancomycin presoaking could be considered a safe and effective preventive measure for postoperative infections after ACLR. Not applicable.

Infratubercle Anterior Closing Wedge Osteotomy Corrects Sagittal Alignment without Affecting Coronal Alignment or Patellar Height.

Background: Excessive posterior tibial slope (PTS) has been associated with a higher risk of graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Although anterior closing wedge osteotomy (ACWO) can reduce the PTS, it may also change the coronal alignment and patellar height. Purpose: To elucidate the radiological outcomes after infratubercle ACWO, specifically to evaluate its influence on perioperative changes in patellar height. Methods: Patients who underwent infratubercle ACWO with combined ACLR with a minimum follow-up of 3 months were included. Surgery was indicated when the PTS was greater than 12°. Radiological evaluation included measurements of the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), PTS, femoral patellar height index (FPHI), and Caton-Deschamps index (CDI) preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Patellar height was classified as patella baja, normal, or alta based on CDI values. Knee recurvatum was measured preoperatively and at final follow-up. Results: A total of 21 patients with a mean age of 21.6 ± 3.0 years were included. Although HKA did not significantly change, significant corrections were achieved in the PTS from 14.5° ± 1.6° to 5.7° ± 1.0° (p < 0.001). No significant change in FPHI was found (preoperative: 1.33 ± 0.11 vs postoperative: 1.30 ± 0.09). Patellar height categories showed no significant differences pre- and postoperatively, while three patients (14.3%) changed their patellar height category (all moved up one category). Knee recurvatum increased significantly from 4.9° ± 2.9° preoperatively to 7.8° ± 3.1° at the final follow-up (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Precise sagittal correction was achieved after infratubercle ACWO without altering the coronal alignment and patella height. Level of Evidence: IV, Case series.

Registry-based cohort study comparing percentages of patients reaching PASS for knee function outcomes after revision ACLR compared to primary ACLR

ObjectivesReaching the Patient-Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) threshold for the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) has previously been reported to successfully identify individuals experiencing clinical success after anterior cruciate...

Effects of Isometric Hold Exercise with Passive Terminal Knee Extension in Restoring Quadriceps Function after ACL Reconstruction – Research design and methods

Effects of Isometric Hold Exercise with Passive Terminal Knee Extension in Restoring Quadriceps Function after ACL Reconstruction – Research design and methods

ACL reconstruction combined with anterolateral structures reconstruction for treating ACL rupture and knee injuries: a finite element analysis.

Introduction: The biomechanical indication for combining anterolateral structures reconstruction (ASLR) with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) to reduce pivot shift in the knee remains unclear. This study aims to investigate knee functionality after ACL rupture with different combinations of injuries, and to compare the effectiveness of ALSR with ACLR for treating these injuries. Methods: A validated finite element model of a human cadaveric knee was used to simulate pivot shift tests on the joint in different states, including 1) an intact knee; 2) after isolated ACL rupture; 3) after ACL rupture combined with different knee injuries or defect, including a posterior tibial slope (PTS) of 20°, an injury to the anterolateral structures (ALS) and an injury to the posterior meniscotibial ligament of the lateral meniscus (LP); 4) after treating the different injuries using isolated ACLR; v. after treating the different injuries using ACLR with ALSR. The knee kinematics, maximum von Mises stress (Max.S) on the tibial articular cartilage (TC) and force in the ACL graft were compared among the different simulation groups. Results and discussion: Comparing with isolated ACL rupture, combined injury to the ALS caused the largest knee laxity, when a combined PTS of 20° induced the largest Max.S on the TC. The joint stability and Max.S on the TC in the knee with an isolated ACL rupture or a combined rupture of ACL and LP were restored to the intact level after being treated with isolated ACLR. The knee biomechanics after a combined rupture of ACL and ALS were restored to the intact level only when being treated with a combination of ACLR and ALSR using a large graft diameter (6mm) for ALSR. However, for the knee after ACL rupture combined with a PTS of 20°, the ATT and Max.S on the TC were still greater than the intact knee even after being treated with a combination of ACLR and ALSR. The finite element analysis showed that ACLR should include ALSR when treating ACL ruptures accompanied by ALS rupture. However, pivot shift in knees with a PTS of 20° was not eliminated even after a combined ACLR and ALSR.

Angle-Specific Analysis of Isokinetic Quadriceps and Hamstring Strength at 6 and 12 Months After Unilateral ACL Reconstruction.

Quadriceps and hamstring strength deficits are related to the increased risk of reinjury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Knee angle-specific quadriceps and hamstring strength differences would be observed in patients with ACLR 6 and 12 months after surgery. Case-series. Level 4. A total of 23 postprimary unilateral ACLR patients followed-up at 6 and 12 months postoperatively and 25 controls were included. Isokinetic knee extension and flexion strength were evaluated at 60 deg/s from 20° to 90°. Statistical parametric mapping were performed to explore the angle-specific strength and the limb symmetry index (LSI). At 6 months postoperatively, the reconstructed leg demonstrated lower knee extension and flexion strength than the contralateral (20°-77°, 24°-90°) (P < 0.01) and control legs (22°-90°, 40°-82°) (P < 0.01). From 6 months to 12 months, knee extension (60°-90°) and flexion (20°-79°) strength improved in the reconstructed leg (P < 0.05), while LSI remained unchanged (P > 0.02). At 12 months, knee extension strength differences persisted in the reconstructed leg compared with the contralateral (20°-81°) and controls (25°-63°) (P < 0.01). ACLR patients had lower LSI of knee extension strength at 6 (20°-59°) and 12 (24°-57°) months postoperatively than the controls (P < 0.02). The reconstructed leg exhibited differences in knee extension strength compared with the contralateral and control legs. Although bilateral knee extension strength increased from 6 to 12 months postoperatively, LSI did not show improvement during this period. Quadriceps restoration was observed only in knee flexion angles greater than 60° compared with controls. Future studies should investigate whether knee extension strength, especially in lower flexion angles, can be enhanced through rehabilitation programs. Furthermore, assessing the impact of this improvement on long-term outcomes and reinjury risk in ACLR patients is warranted.

Patients undergoing multiligamentknee reconstruction injured during pivoting sports demonstrate similar clinical, functionaland return to sport outcomes by 2 years compared with those undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

This study investigates the clinical and activity-based outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) versus multiligamentous knee reconstruction (MLKR) following a pivoting sports injury. Fifty MLKR patients were included, of which 20 (40%) were injured during pivoting sports. A further 50 patients undergoing ACLR following an injury during pivoting sports were consecutively recruited for comparison. Patients were assessed before the surgery and at 6-, 12- and 24 months with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, Tegner activity scale (TAS) and anterior cruciate ligament return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) score. Knee movement, the single (SHD) and triple (THD) hop tests for distance, and peak isokinetic knee extensor and flexor strength were assessed, with Limb Symmetry Indices (LSIs) calculated. Outcomes were compared across groups: (1) ACLR (n = 50), (2) MLKR (n = 50)and (3) MLKR due to pivoting sport injury (n = 20). IKDC, TAS and ACL-RSI scores remained lower (p < 0.05) in the full MLKR versus ACLR cohort at all timepoints. Comparing the ACLR and MLKR cohort that had injuries specifically during pivoting sports, the IKDC (p < 0.001) and TAS (p = 0.009) were higher in the ACLR group at 6 months, and the ACL-RSI was higher at 6 (p < 0.001) and 12 (p = 0.007) months, there were no further differences. Hop and knee extensor strength LSIs were lower (p < 0.05) in the full MLKR (versus ACLR) cohort at all timepoints (apart from the 24-month SHD LSI). However, the ACLR group only demonstrated greater LSIs than the pivoting sport MLKR for the SHD at 6 months (p < 0.001), and knee extensor strength at 6 (p < 0.001) and 12 (p < 0.001) months. While the recovery of patients undergoing MLKR due to a pivoting sports injury is delayed compared with their ACLR counterparts, the clinical outcome and activity profile are similar by 24 months. Level IV.

Articular Cartilage Damage in the Patellofemoral Compartment at ACL Reconstruction Predicts Poor Postoperative Subjective Outcomes in Patients Age 40 and Older.

The purpose of this study was to investigate factors that influence clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in patients aged ≥40 years. We studied 264 patients aged ≥40 and 154 patients aged ≤20 years who underwent ACL reconstruction at several surgical centers. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors that influenced the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at 1 year post-ACL reconstruction. In the older patient group, cartilage damage in the patellofemoral compartment at surgery was a significant risk factor for poor postoperative KOOS subscores (pain, activities of daily living [ADL], sports, and quality of life [QOL]). Articular cartilage damage in the lateral compartment also significantly influenced one of the postoperative KOOS subscores (symptoms). In the younger patient group, articular cartilage damage in any compartments did not influence the postoperative KOOS subscores; only two preoperative KOOS subscores (symptoms and QOL) significantly influenced their postoperative KOOS subscores. We concluded that the articular cartilage damage in the patellofemoral compartment at ACL reconstruction predicts poor KOOS subscores at the 1-year follow-up in patients aged ≥40 years. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (Prevalence); Level of evidence, 2.

Medial Meniscectomy at the Time of ACL Reconstruction Is Associated With Postoperative Anterior Tibial Translation: A Retrospective Analysis.

Medial meniscal pathology and management have not been associated with postoperative anterior tibial translation (ATT) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of medial meniscal injury and treatment on pre- and postoperative ATT in the setting of primary ACLR. More specifically, the association between repairable medial meniscal tears, medial meniscectomy, and postoperative ATT, along with rates of revision surgery, was examined. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. A retrospective review was performed for patients who underwent ACLR between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2015 at a single center. Descriptive data were obtained from an institutional database for a total of 396 patients included in this study and followed for 1 year postoperatively. Statistical analysis was performed to examine associations of meniscal treatment with postoperative ATT measurements made by KT-1000 arthrometer. A total of 243 patients underwent isolated ACLR with autograft, 72 patients underwent autograft ACLR and partial medial meniscectomy (MMx) (ACLR + MMx), and 81 patients underwent autograft ACLR and medial meniscal repair (MMR) (ACLR + MMR). Patients with ACLR + MMx had higher mean age and body mass index compared with patients in the other groups. Patients who underwent ACLR + MMx had greater postoperative side-to-side ATT compared with patients undergoing ACLR (1.55 mm vs 1.07 mm; P = .04) or patients undergoing ACLR + MMR (1.55 mm vs 1.01 mm; P = .03). The ACLR + MMx group was less likely to have symmetric (<3-mm side-to-side difference) postoperative ATT compared with the ACLR group (85% vs 93%; P = .03). There was no difference in postoperative ATT between ACLR and ACLR + MMR. Postoperative return to the operating room was greater in the ACLR + MRR group compared with the ACLR + MMx group (21.9% vs 8.2%; P = .05). MMx at the time of ACLR led to higher postoperative ATT compared with isolated ACLR or ACLR + MMR.