An exhibition of photographs, which opened in Johannesburg at Museum Africa in 1994, evoked a range of reactions from spectators and critics alike. subject of the show was poor, white South Africans. Historically, images depicting poverty in the South African documentary genre have been concerned with black poverty, principally because it is so prevalent. Of white poverty, there is only a small and sporadic record, mainly in select archives and in a small sample of the Carnegie Commission's inquiry into white poverty conducted during the depression in South Africa during the 1930s. It found that those who were white and poor had a tendency to cling to farm life. They were characterized by a limited outlook, by lack of ambition and enterprise and by timidity with regard to the outside world.(1) In consequence, feelings of inferiority were experienced by them and they bore their lot with dull and passive resignation. In contrast, there exists a most comprehensive and searing record of this nature in countries such as the United States and Great Britain; for example, Jacob Riis's How the Other Half Lives (1890), Paul Taylor and Dorothea Lange's An American Exodus (1939), James Agee and Walker Evans's Let Us Now Praise Famous Men (1941), Don McCullin's Perspectives (1996) and Eugene Richard's Below the Line: Living Poor in America (1987). These texts provide not only a document of the past, but also a precedent for photographers working in that genre. In photography of this nature there is always uneven allocation of power. That is, one must always question the ambition of the photographer in making such images. Indeed, the manner in which such images are perceived and received depends in part upon the photographer's relationship to his/her subject. exchange involves manipulation, submissions, as one reviewer remarked, The subject is made to pose and perform like a marionette.(2) Photographers' intentions in this regard and their implied comment about their subject is a crucial ingredient in the making of such images. For example, the photographs by Riis in How the Other Half Lives were intended to parallel the ugliness of the poverty he wished to depict. Therefore, he consciously attempted to produce images that would militate against artfulness in photography. Evans's photographs of sharecroppers also exemplify his sympathy for their predicament. Indeed, Evans's images were criticized for ennobling the plight of the poor. He depicts his subjects with authority and strength; the qualities of spirit and resilience are evident in Evans's portraits. Roger Ballen's publication, Platteland, exposes the plight of poor whites in South Africa. It was Ballen's intention to focus on the irony of a group of people whom, despite political privilege, have remained economically destitute. These images present a visual parallel for the alienation and immobility he observed. photographs appear unapologetically severe and uncompromising, yet there is a sadness conveyed by these images that indicates an essential aspect of the tragedy that pervades this troubled land.(3) is Afrikaans term for rural areas. Plattelanders, therefore, refers to country people who are regarded as unsophisticated and often narrow-minded.(4) A striking feature of the photographs in Platteland is Ballen's ability to penetrate the mask of self protection in order to expose a certain naivete and innocence of his subjects. This quality of stripping his subject's social facade is characteristic of the whole project. It is achievement to have gained access and photographed this group of people, since it is a subject that has been deliberately hidden from view. Most of the photographs are indoor shots. interiors act as indexes for the Plattelanders' tastes, values and social status. intimacy of the home and its status as a place of refuge act in a way that heightens the subjects' vulnerability. …
Read full abstract