Affordable Care Act Research Articles

Understanding Renal Failure Mortality Trends and Determinants in the US (1999–2020): Impacts of the Affordable Care Act, Advancements, Disparities, and Challenges

Introduction: Renal failure, encompassing both acute and chronic forms, stands as a formidable public health challenge with far-reaching consequences for individual well-being and healthcare systems. This study delves into the mortality rates of renal failure in the United States over two transformative decades, from 1999 to 2020. Renal failure’s significance arises from its escalating prevalence, substantial healthcare costs, and the imperative to understand the multifaceted factors that influence its outcomes. Objectives: The primary objectives of this research are to analyze temporal trends in renal failure mortality rates, explore the impact of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and advancements in renal care practices on mortality rates, and assess demographic disparities in mortality outcomes. Methods: Utilizing CDC WONDER’s multi-cause mortality data, we assessed mortality due to renal failure (ICD-10 Codes: N17–N19). Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) were collected and stratified by sex and race. The Joinpoint Regression Program analyzed trends, calculating annual percent change (APC) and significant average annual percent change (AAPC) from 1999 to 2020. Segmented line regression models were employed for parallel pairwise comparisons. Results: Renal failure mortality rates decreased for both sexes during the late 2000s. The ACA’s enactment in 2010 coincided with improved access to healthcare, possibly contributing to the decline. Demographic disparities highlighted variations in mortality rates across racial and gender groups. Advancements in renal care practices were evident, which were driven by innovations in treatment modalities and disease management. Significant temporal trends were observed by race, with varying periods of decrease or uptrend. Conclusions: The decline in renal failure mortality rates during the late 2000s was potentially influenced by the ACA and advances in renal care practices. Demographic disparities emphasize the need for equitable healthcare access and interventions. These findings underscore the significance of healthcare policies and medical advancements in reducing renal failure mortality rates and addressing disparities. Persistent efforts to mitigate challenges such as healthcare access, cost barriers, and disparities remain crucial to enhancing renal failure outcomes.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and oral health care use among formerly incarcerated people in the United States

BackgroundFormerly incarcerated people report less frequent oral health care use, despite having more substantial oral health problems. This study aimed to determine whether the adoption of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) has improved oral health care use among formerly incarcerated people in the United States. MethodData were from Wave I (1994-1995), Wave IV (2008), and Wave V (2016-2018) of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (n = 9,108), a nationally representative cohort study in the United States. ResultsOn the basis of the results of multiple logistic regression analysis with interaction terms, the authors found a positive and statistically significant interaction between prior incarceration and living in a state with ACA adoption on past-year oral health care use, net of potential confounding variables (incarceration × ACA: odds ratio, 1.587; 95% CI, 1.043 to 2.414). Substantively, the findings suggest that people with a history of incarceration are less likely to use oral health care, and this disparity is more likely to occur in states without ACA adoption. ConclusionsACA adoption corresponds with improvements in the receipt of oral health care among formerly incarcerated people. Practical ImplicationsThis study builds on prior evidence highlighting that the ACA is beneficial in connecting formerly incarcerated people to health care services and suggests that these benefits may extend to improving access to and use of oral health care.

How does health spending among demographic groups compare to Affordable Care Act premium regulations?

AbstractThe Affordable Care Act (ACA) substantially altered regulations in the nongroup and small group health insurance markets and those markets continue to receive significant policy attention. To understand how those markets have functioned in recent years and how they would be impacted by policy changes, we estimated enrollment and spending by age and sex using claims data covering enrollment in ACA risk‐adjusted plans in 2017–2019 and compared spending to a federal default age‐rating curve for premiums. Our results suggest that women aged 55–64 helped stabilize the nongroup market through high enrollment and relatively low spending. Men enrolled in the marketplace also subsidized other nongroup enrollees but to a lesser extent than expected. In fact, men aged25–50 enrolled in nongroup plans spent 18% more than their counterparts enrolled through a small employer. These unique spending patterns have interesting policy implications, including that lowering the Medicare eligibility age would likely increase premiums in the nongroup market.

The Impact of the Medicaid Reimbursement Bump on Influenza Vaccination Rates Among US Teens: Evidence from the National Immunization Survey-Teen 2011-2020.

Many adolescents do not receive basic preventive care such as influenza vaccinations. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) temporarily increased Medicaid reimbursements for primary care services, including vaccine administration, in 2013 to 2014. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of reimbursement increases on influenza vaccination rates among adolescents with Medicaid. This repeated cross-sectional study used a difference-in-difference approach to compare changes in annual influenza vaccination rates for 20,884 adolescents 13 to 17 years old covered by Medicaid with adequate provider-reported data in 18 states with larger extended (>$5, 2013 to 2019) versus larger temporary (2013 to 2014 only) versus smaller reimbursement changes. We used linear probability models with individual-level random effects, adjusting for state and individual characteristics and annual time trends to assess the impact of a Medicaid vaccine administration reimbursement increase on annual influenza vaccination. Mean Medicaid reimbursements for vaccine administration doubled from 2011 to 2013 to 2014 (eg, from $11 to $22 for CPT 90460). States with smaller reimbursement changes had higher mean reimbursements and higher adjusted vaccination rates at baseline (2011) compared with states with larger temporary and extended reimbursement changes. The reimbursement change was not associated with increases in influenza vaccination rates. Influenza vaccination rates were low among adolescents with Medicaid throughout the study period, particularly in states with lower Medicaid reimbursement levels before the ACA. That reimbursement increases were not associated with higher vaccination rates suggests additional efforts are needed to improve influenza vaccination rates in this population.

Abstract A134: The impact of the Affordable Care Act on the colorectal cancer landscape in Louisiana

Abstract Louisiana (LA) is the only state in the deep south opting to expand Medicaid. This, along with the federal tax subsidies for low income individual to buy insurance on the health marketplace, facilitated health care access to medically underserved populations in LA. This study examines the differences in sociodemographic characteristics of those diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) before and after the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) was implemented in LA, highlighting differences in receipt of timely CRC treatment and survival rates. Patient demographics, cancer treatment, and outcomes data were obtained from the Louisiana Tumor Registry and the sample population included adults diagnosed with CRC. Pre-ACA was defined from 1/2012-6/30/2016 and the post-ACA was 7/1/2016- 12/31/2020. Variables examined were age, race, sex, poverty, socioeconomic status, insurance, marital status, distance to urban center, stage of diagnosis, number of tumors, type and date of any treatment received. Descriptive analysis summarized sociodemographic and cancer diagnosis variables for the sample across the two time periods. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the impact of ACA and Kaplan-Meier plots and cox regression analysis was used to examine the impact of ACA on survival rates. 20,497 people were diagnosed with CRC during the study time period (pre-ACA 10,044 vs post-ACA 10,453) and there were significant differences noted with age, marital status, poverty, SES, insurance, and all cancer diagnosis variables. The number of uninsured dropped by two-thirds (6% vs 2%, <0.001) while the number of those on Medicaid increased (6.5% vs 14%, <0.001). There were no significant differences in diagnosis by race in the overall sample however, among the Medicaid population, pre-ACA, 57% of those diagnosed were Black vs 40% who were White. Post-ACA, 50% of those diagnosed were Black vs 46% White. The percentage of patients diagnosed at Stage I increased post-ACA by 1% while the percentage of patients diagnosed at Stage III decreased by 2% (<0.0001). The percentage of those diagnosed without tumors increased from 74% pre-ACA to 78% post-ACA. The number of those who received chemotherapy and radiation also increased pre vs post-ACA. Regression models showed significant impact of ACA on stage of diagnosis, receipt of timely treatment, and uninsured rates. There were no significant differences in survival time across the two time periods, however, separated by insurance status, the Medicaid and private insurance populations saw significant improvements in survival time post-ACA. Expanded Medicaid coverage through Healthy LA began in the summer of 2016. Since then, more than 732,000 individuals have benefited from Medicaid expansion coverage and 92,607 have received federal subsidies. The results of this study present evidence to other southern states on the advantages of Medicaid expansion in cancer treatment and survival. Citation Format: Bilikisu Elewonibi, Malesa Pereira, Yaqi Zou. The impact of the Affordable Care Act on the colorectal cancer landscape in Louisiana [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 16th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2023 Sep 29-Oct 2;Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023;32(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A134.

“Pick a Plan and Roll the Dice”: A qualitative study of consumer experiences selecting a health plan in the non-group market

BackgroundFor consumers without access to employer-sponsored or public insurance, health plan choices in the non-group (individual) insurance market that do not meet consumer needs have the potential for negative downstream implications for health and financial well-being. ObjectiveThis qualitative interview study sought to understand consumers’ experiences and challenges with choosing a non-group health plan, among those who later had negative experiences with the plan they chose. MethodsWe conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with a purposive sample of 36 participants from a large regional health insurance carrier in three states who enrolled in non-group plans in 2017 (21 in Affordable Care Act (ACA) Marketplace plans and 15 enrolled off-Marketplace). Participants were included if they reported negative experiences using their plan after enrollment, such as higher-than-expected medical costs. Interviews explored challenges choosing a plan; information needed for choosing; usefulness of available tools; and preferred format for interventions to improve plan choice experiences. We analyzed interview transcripts using thematic content analysis. ResultsStudy participants reported experiencing substantial challenges to choosing an insurance plan. Key barriers included understanding insurance terms, finding relevant information, and making comparisons across plans. Participants valued the ability to make comparisons across carriers when using the Marketplace websites but were less satisfied with customer service. Suggestions for improvement included greater standardization of plans and language and availability of customized one-on-one assistance. ConclusionFindings from this study suggest that health plan selection in the non-group market presents challenges to consumers that may be addressed through enrollment assistance and improved presentation of information. Personalized assistance to find and choose coverage may lead to plan choices that better meet consumer needs and increase confidence choosing a plan in subsequent enrollment periods.

The impact of the affordable care act on access to bariatric surgery in Maryland

IntroductionThis study aims to investigate the influence of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on the utilization of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) procedures in Maryland. MethodsUsing the Maryland State Inpatient Database, this retrospective study compared all patients undergoing RYGB during the pre-ACA (2007–2009) and post-ACA (2018–2020) periods, including patient demographic factors, pre-existing conditions, and socioeconomic factors. ResultsA total of 16,494 RYGB procedures were performed during the study period, of which 12,089 (73.3 ​%) were post-ACA. This was a 179.2 ​% increase in patients undergoing RYGB post-ACA; nearly triple that of the pre-ACA period. There was a significant decrease in uninsured patients (5.6 ​%–1.5 ​%, p ​< ​0.01) an increase in Black patients (32.1 ​%–46.8 ​%, p ​< ​0.01) and Medicaid beneficiaries (6.0 ​% pre-ACA to 17.8 ​% post-ACA, p ​< ​0.01). There were significant reductions in adverse outcomes (long hospital stays, hemorrhage, GIT leaks, and mortality) across all insurance types (all p ​< ​0.01). ConclusionThe ACA increased access to RYGB procedures, especially in Black and Medicaid recipients in Maryland, enhancing healthcare across all insurance types.

Entrepreneurship Lock and the Demand for Health Insurance: Evidence from the US Affordable Care Act

Most US workers have health insurance plans sponsored and subsidized by their employers. The US Affordable Care Act (ACA) improved and expanded the availability of non-employer-based health insurance, with protections for pre-existing conditions, guaranteed issue, and community rating in non-group markets. Using National Health Interview Survey data for 2009 to 2018 and a difference-in-differences modeling approach, this study finds that the ACA increased self-employment in 2015 and 2016 among US adults with higher demand for health insurance. The probability of self-employment increased by 1.4 to 1.8 percentage points among adults ages 30 to 64 with at least one pre-ACA declinable condition and no alternative source of health insurance through a spouse’s employer or public programs. However, these effects were short-lived. As uncertainty about the long-term viability of the ACA’s health insurance exchanges increased in 2017 and 2018, the probability of self-employment among individuals with high demand for insurance fell to pre-ACA levels.

Association of the affordable care act with racial and ethnic disparities in uninsured emergency department utilization

BackgroundDisparities in uninsured emergency department (ED) use are well documented. However, a comprehensive analysis evaluating how the Affordable Care Act (ACA) may have reduced racial and ethnic disparities is lacking. The goal was to assess the association of the ACA with racial and ethnic disparities in uninsured ED use.MethodsThis study used data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) State Emergency Department Databases (SEDD) for Georgia, Florida, Massachusetts, and New York from 2011 to 2017. Participants include non-elderly adults between 18 and 64 years old. Outcomes include uninsured rates of ED visits by racial and ethnic groups and stratified by medical urgency using the New York University ED algorithm. Visits were aggregated to year-quarter ED visits per 100,000 population and stratified for non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic non-elderly adults. Quasi-experimental difference-in-differences and triple differences regression analyses to identify the effect of the ACA and the separate effect of the Medicaid expansion were used comparing uninsured ED visits by race and ethnicity groups pre-post ACA.ResultsThe ACA was associated with a 14% reduction in the rate of uninsured ED visits per 100,000 population (from 10,258 pre-ACA to 8,877 ED visits per 100,000 population post-ACA) overall. The non-Hispanic Black compared to non-Hispanic White disparity decreased by 12.4% (-275.1 ED visits per 100,000) post-ACA. About 60% of the decline in the Black-White disparity was attributed to disproportionate declines in ED visit rates for conditions classified as not-emergent (-93.2 ED visits per 100,000), and primary care treatable/preventable (-64.1 ED visits per 100,000), while the disparity in ED visit rates for injuries and not preventable conditions also declined (-106.57 ED visits per 100,000). All reductions in disparities were driven by the Medicaid expansion. No significant decrease in Hispanic-White disparity was observed.ConclusionsThe ACA was associated with fewer uninsured ED visits and reduced the Black-White ED disparity, driven mostly by a reduction in less emergent ED visits after the ACA in Medicaid expansion states. Disparities between Hispanic and non-Hispanic White adults did not decline after the ACA. Despite the positive momentum of declining disparities in uninsured ED visits, disparities, especially among Black people, remain.

Health insurance and fertility among low-income, childless, single women: evidence from the ACA Medicaid expansions.

Expansions of Medicaid family planning services have been associated with decreases in pregnancy rates. Access to a broader range of medical, non-family planning services may influence pregnancy rates as well if the increased exposure to medical services spills over to other kinds of behaviour. Using a difference-in-difference approach, I examine the impact of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansions on the propensity of low-income, single women to become single mothers. Previous expansions of Medicaid family planning services allow us to also investigate the influence of access to other medical services (i.e. non-family planning). I find that although access to contraceptives is associated with a reduction in the propensity of becoming a single mother among adult, low-income women, medical services beyond access to contraceptives can provide additional impacts.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and Pediatric Medical Clinicians’ Application of Fluoride Varnish

Fluoride varnish reduces children's tooth decay, yet few clinicians provide it. Most state Medicaid programs have covered this service during medical visits for children aged 1 to 5 years, but private insurers began covering it only in 2015 due to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) mandate that they cover a set of recommended preventive services without cost-sharing. Evidence on clinicians' behavior change postmandate is limited. To examine monthly changes in fluoride varnish applications among pediatric clinicians following the ACA mandate. Using all-payer claims data from Massachusetts, this cohort study applied an interrupted time-series approach with linear regression models comparing changes in monthly clinician-level outcomes before and after the mandate. Participants included clinicians who billed at least 5 well-child visits for patients aged 1 to 5 years and were observed at least once premandate. Adjusted for clinician fixed effects, models were assessed overall and separately for clinicians categorized by their monthly share of well-child visits paid by private insurers before the mandate: mostly private (>66% of visits paid by private insurers), mostly public (<33% of visits paid by private insurers), or mixed (33%-66% of visits paid by private insurers) insurance types. Analysis was performed from June 1, 2022, to July 31, 2023. Preenactment and postenactment of the ACA mandate for private insurers to cover fluoride varnish applications without cost-sharing. Clinician-month measures of whether fluoride varnish was provided during at least 1 well-child visit and the share of such visits, analyzed separately for clinicians who did and did not apply fluoride varnish premandate. The sample included 2405 clinicians, with 107 841 clinician-months. Premandate, 10.48% of the visits included fluoride varnish applications. Two years postmandate, the likelihood of ever applying fluoride varnish was 13.64 (95% CI, 10.97-16.32) percentage points higher. For clinicians providing fluoride varnish premandate, the share of visits with fluoride varnish increased by 9.22 (95% CI, 5.41-13.02) percentage points. This increase was observed in clinicians who treated children with insurance that was mostly mixed and mostly private; no substantial change was observed among those treating children with mostly public insurance. In this cohort study of pediatric primary care clinicians, an association between the ACA mandate and an increase in fluoride varnish application was observed, especially among clinicians primarily treating privately insured patients and those applying it premandate. However, application remains infrequent, suggesting persistent barriers.

Trends in Racial Disparities in Healthcare Expenditures Among Senior Medicare Fee-for-service Enrollees in 2007–2020

AbstractDespite the universal healthcare coverages, racial disparities in healthcare expenditures among senior Medicare beneficiaries exist. A few studies explored how racial disparities in healthcare expenditures changed over past decades and how it affected differently across 4 minoritized races, by type of Medicare and poverty levels. We conducted a longitudinal study of 21 healthcare expenditures from senior Medicare fee-for-service enrollees to determine overall and secular trends in racial disparities in healthcare expenditures between 2007 and 2020, during which the Affordable Care Act (ACA) came into full force and the COVID-19 pandemic had begun. We found important disparities in healthcare expenditures across 4 minoritized races compared to Whites, even after adjusting for possible confounders for such disparities. Disparities between Hispanics/Asians and Whites were much greater than disparities between Blacks and Whites, in all Parts A, B, and D expenditures. This reality has not been sufficiently emphasized in the literature. Importantly, Black-White disparities in total Part B expenditure gradually worsened between 2007 and 2020, and Hispanic-White and Asian-White disparities worsened greatly during that time window. Health planners need to focus on these large disparities and develop methods to shrink them.

Impact of the Affordable Care Act on Prescription Contraceptive Use and Costs Among Privately Insured Women, 2006–2020

BackgroundIn the years immediately following the Affordable Care Act (ACA)'s contraceptive coverage requirement, out-of-pocket costs fell for all Food and Drug Administration–approved contraceptive methods and use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) increased. This analysis examines whether these trends have continued through 2020 for privately insured women. MethodsUsing 2006–2020 MarketScan data, we examined trends in prescription contraceptive use and out-of-pocket costs among women 13 to 49 years old. Multivariable analyses model the likelihood of contraceptive use and paying $0 post-ACA requirement (vs. pre-ACA requirement) for contraception, controlling for age group, U.S. region, urban versus rural, and cohort year. ResultsThe likelihood of LARC insertion increased post-ACA requirement (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.127, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.121–1.133), with insertion rates peaking at 3.73% for intrauterine devices (IUDs) and 1.08% for implants in 2019, before declining with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Although the likelihood of paying $0 for LARC increased after the ACA requirement (IUD: aOR 5.495, 95% CI 5.278–5.716; implant: aOR 7.199, 95% CI 6.992–7.412), the proportion of individuals paying $0 declined to 69% for IUDs and 73% for implants in 2020, after having peaked at 88% in 2014 and 90% in 2016, respectively. For oral contraceptives, both use (aOR 1.028, 95% CI 1.026–1.030) and paying $0 (aOR 20.399, 95% CI 20.301–20.499) increased significantly after the ACA requirement. ConclusionWith the exception of oral contraceptives, the proportion of individuals paying $0 for all contraceptive methods declined after peaking in 2014 for IUDs, 2016 for the implant, and 2019 for non-LARC methods. Future monitoring is needed to understand the continuing impact of the ACA requirement on prescription contraceptive use and costs.

States' racial resentment correlates with administrative distancing and lower rates of health plan selection in affordable care act marketplaces: a cross sectional analysis.

In the United States, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) pursued equity in healthcare access and treatment, but ACA implementation varied, especially limiting African Americans' gains. Marketplaces for subsidized purchase of coverage were sometimes implemented with limited outreach and enrollment assistance efforts. Reflecting state's ACA receptivity or reluctance, state's implementation may rest on sociopolitical stances and racial sentiments. Some states were unwilling to provide publicly supported healthcare to nonelderly, non-disabled adults- "the undeserving poor" -who evoke anti-black stereotypes. The present study assessed whether some states shunned Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplaces and implemented them less vigorously than other states, leading to fewer eligible persons selecting insurance plans. It assessed if states' actions were motivated by racial resentment, because states connote marketplaces to be government assistance for unworthy African Americans. Using marketplace and plan selection data from 2015, we rated states' marketplace structures along a four-level continuum indicating greater acceptance of marketplaces, ranging from states assuming sole responsibility to minimal responsibility. Using national data from a four-question modern racism scale, state-wide racial resentment estimates were estimated at the state level. Analysis assessed associations between state levels of racial resentment with states' marketplace structure. Further analysis assessed relationships between both state levels of racial resentment and states' marketplace structure with states' consumer plan selection rates-representing the proportion of persons eligible to enroll in insurance plans who selected a plan. Racial resentment was greater in states with less responsibility for the administration of the marketplaces than actively participating states. States higher in racial resentment also showed lower rates of plan selection, pointing to less commitment to implementing marketplace provisions and fulfilling the ACA's coverage-improvement mission. Differences persisted after controlling for differences in conservatism, uninsurance, poor health, and rejection of Medicaid expansion. Resentment of African Americans' purported irresponsibility and entitlement to government assistance may interfere with states structuring and operating marketplaces to maximize health insurance opportunities for everyone available under the ACA. N/A.

Association of Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act With Medicaid Coverage in the Prepregnancy, Prenatal, and Postpartum Periods.

We evaluated how the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid eligibility expansion affected perinatal insurance coverage patterns for Medicaid-enrolled beneficiaries who gave birth overall and by race/ethnicity. We also examined state-level heterogeneous impacts. Using the 2011-2013 Medicaid Analytic eXtract and the 2016-2018 Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System Analytic File databases, we identified 1.4 million beneficiaries giving birth in 2012 (pre-ACA expansion cohort) and 1.5 million in 2017 (post-ACA expansion cohort). We constructed monthly coverage rates for the two cohorts by state Medicaid expansion status and obtained difference-in-differences estimates of the association of Medicaid expansion with coverage overall and by race/ethnicity group (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic). To explore state-level heterogeneous impacts, we divided the expansion and non-expansion states into groups based on the differences in the income eligibility limits for low-income parents in each state between 2012 and2017. Medicaid expansion was associated with 13 percentage points higher coverage in the 9 to 12months before giving birth, and 11 percentage points higher coverage at 6 to 12months postpartum. Hispanic birthing individuals had the greatest relative increases in coverage, followed by non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black individuals. In Medicaid expansion states, those who experienced the greatest increases in income eligibility limits for low-income parents generally saw the greatest increases in coverage. In non-expansion states, there was less heterogeneity between state groupings. Pregnancy-related Medicaid eligibility did not have major changes in the 2010s. However, states' adoption of ACA Medicaid expansion after 2012 was associated with increased Medicaid coverage before, during, and after pregnancy. The increases varied by race/ethnicity and across states.

Association of the affordable care act with perceived health care quality of cancer survivors

BackgroundThe association between the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) and perceptions of health care quality of cancer survivors is not well established. The purpose of this study was to examine changes in perceived health care quality concurrent with the implementation of the ACA among cancer survivors relative to a non-cancer comparison group. MethodsWe used cross-sectional data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (N = 30,542). Participants were considered cancer survivors if they had a diagnosis greater than five years before the interview. The pre-ACA period included the years 2008 through 2014. The post-ACA period included 2017 through 2020. Using difference-in-differences methods, we estimated the association of ACA implementation with perceived health care quality (measured from excellent to fair/poor) using propensity score-matched cancer survivors (n = 2298) and a non-cancer comparison group (n = 6669) with weighted logistic models. ResultsThere were similar distributions of perceptions of excellent, very good, good, and fair/poor health care quality regardless of cancer status or time-period. The pre–post ACA implementation difference of reporting excellent, very good and good health care quality (odds ratio [OR]: 1.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83–1.19; OR: 0.98, 95% CI 0.83–1.19; and OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.87–1.28 respectively) compared to fair/poor was similar in cancer survivors relative to the non-cancer comparison group. ConclusionsThe initial implementation of the ACA appeared to have no effect on perceived overall health care quality reported by cancer survivors when compared to individuals without a history of cancer. Health care policies and domains which continue to support better patient-perceived care quality should be assessed in the cancer survivor population.

What the Evolution of 1332 Waivers Tells Us about Their Innovative Potential

Section 1332 of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) provides states unprecedented flexibility to alter federal health policy. The authors analyze state waiver activity from 2019 to 2023, applying a comparative approach to understand waivers proposed by Georgia, Colorado, Washington, Oregon, and Nevada. Much of the waiver activity during this period focused on reinsurance programs. During the Trump administration, the most innovative waiver application was from Georgia, which sought to restructure and decentralize its individual market, moving away from the framework established by the ACA. While the Biden administration suspended Georgia's efforts, Democratic-led states have focused implementing waiver programs supporting and expanding on the ACA. This has included adopting public-option insurance plans offered by private insurers and expanding eligibility for qualified health plans for previously ineligible groups. The authors’ analysis offers insights into contemporary health politics, policy durability, and the role of the administrative presidency.

Aging Out of Dependent Coverage and Health Insurance Trends, 2014–2019

ObjectiveTo examine changes in health insurance coverage when adults age out of dependent coverage at age 26 after the implementation of most Affordable Care Act (ACA) provisions. Our analysis also documented differences by sex, race and ethnicity, and state Medicaid expansion status. MethodsWe used a regression discontinuity design and the 2014–2019 American Community Survey to estimate coverage changes (uninsured, any private, employer-sponsored coverage, direct purchase, and Medicaid) at age 26. Our main sample consisted of adult citizens aged 22–29 years. ResultsUninsurance increased by 2.7% points [95% CI; 1.8–3.4] at age 26, which was driven by a significant decline in any private insurance (3.7% point decrease). Young adults experienced a smaller increase in the uninsured rate on turning age 26 in states that expanded in 2014 compared to nonexpansion states (2.2% and 3.2% point increases, respectively), but the difference was not significant (P = .07). Changes in the uninsured rate at age 26 did not differ significantly by sex or race and ethnicity. ConclusionsThe 2010 dependent coverage provision led to more coverage options among young adults and in turn the uninsured rate declined among a population historically among the most likely to lack coverage. The 2014 Medicaid and Marketplace expansions reduced the uninsured rate even further among young adults. Despite important progress, our findings for 2014–2019 were similar to previous studies using pre-ACA data suggesting that coverage loss remains a risk when adults age out of dependent coverage at age 26.

Two Novel Pathways to Universal Health Coverage in the United States – A Physician’s Perspective

The United States’ health system is fragmented, opaque and too costly. Despite the 2010 enactment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) with subsequent enrollment of millions of formerly uninsured Americans, true Universal Health Coverage remains a dubious specter with an uncertain future. In 2022, 27.6 million Americans of all ages did not have health insurance. The uncompensated cost for healthcare services to the uninsured is estimated to average between $30 to 50 billion per year. Sadly, most uninsured Americans are people of color and people from low-income families with at least one worker in the family. Aside from personal tragedies falling upon uninsured Americans including bankruptcy, poor medical care, emotional and mental hardship, pending bills have to be paid eventually by someone. Notwithstanding federal and state governments chiming in, it is in the end the common taxpayer who pays for the lack of Universal Health Coverage. Hence, it is in the best interest of our society as a whole to elicit financially sound pathways to accomplish the longawaited objective of Universal Health Coverage in the United States.

Medicaid Expansions and Access to Substance Abuse Treatment Services Among Limited English Proficiency Populations.

Although the myriad of provisions under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) have generally increased coverage and financial access to the health systems, language barriers represent a serious challenge to access to care among Limited English Proficiency (LEP) populations. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of Medicaid expansions under the ACA on the availability of language services and Medicaid acceptance in substance abuse treatment (SAT) facilities. A quasi-experimental difference-in-differences design with multiple time periods was used to compare changes in the availability of language services and Medicaid as a payment source between Medicaid expansion and nonexpansion states. Facility-level observational data in the National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services 2010-2019 was included. Availability of LEP services and Medicaid acceptance in the SAT facilities. The proportion of SAT facilities that provide LEP services increased from 40% in 2013 to 53% in 2019. The proportions by state are heterogeneous, ranging from approximately 20% to 70%. The ACA Medicaid expansions are not associated with changes in the availability of LEP services in the facilities. Moreover, Medicaid acceptance in the expansion states increased gradually following the expansion; however, the estimates are not statistically significant. The ACA Medicaid expansion had no impact on the availability of LEP services and the acceptance of Medicaid as a payment source in the SAT facilities.