AbstractBackgroundRisk factors for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) include biologic (e.g. vascular), economic, and socio‐cultural factors. AD incidence and prevalence has been linked to race, and African American/Black individuals (AA/B) are at greater risk compared to non‐Hispanic Whites (NHW), due to physiological and social factors, however few clinical research studies are dedicated to prospective and thoughtful data collection on both physiology (biomarkers) and social/structural risk factors, including discrimination.MethodsWe enrolled 49 middle‐age, cognitively normal B/AA (n = 29) and NHW (n = 20) participants with a family history of AD, and examined correlations between cognition and a perceived discrimination. Cognitive assessments included tests of global cognition, executive function, verbal and visuospatial memory, and language. Six discrimination factors were derived from a larger battery of individually validated assessments of perceived discrimination including, Expanded Everyday Discrimination (EED), Major Experiences of Discrimination (MED), Chronic Work Discrimination and Harassment (WORK), and the Heightened Vigilance (HVIGIL). Factor scores derived from these assessments included ‘Disrespect’, ‘Aggression’, ‘Housing’, ‘Avoidance’, ‘Professional’, and ‘Personal’. Models controlled for education, income, race, and age.ResultsPerceived discrimination had an influence on cognitive scores in a race‐independent manner in this cohort. It was also found that this relationship maybe stratified by educational level. Participants were mostly women (73.5%) highly educated (42.9% post‐Graduate education) and B/AA participants reported more perceived discrimination compared to NHWs across all 6 composite discrimination factors. We observed a positive association between episodic memory score and the 'housing’ discrimination factor (p = 0.34 (0.03)), such that increased housing discrimination was associated with increased cognition. A negative correlation was observed between working memory and the discrimination factor ‘Professional’ (p = ‐0.3 (0.05)).ConclusionDiscrimination negatively affects health outcomes and disease risk. Here we report a negative correlation between working memory and ‘professional’ factor score. We also report a positive correlation between cognition and housing discrimination. This latter is likely explained by the relationship between discrimination and geographic mobility, highlighting the presence of systemic and situational racism across all levels of socioeconomic status. Future AD research should incorporate historical and current data collection on redlining, Area Deprivation Index (ADI), and social and housing mobility.