A thesis that is rarely stated but often assumed in art criticism and aesthetics concerns the inseparability of form and content in art. The thesis of inseparability states that (1) it is impossible have the same content in two different forms; and (2) it is impossible have the same form in two different contents.' Clearly, the thesis needs elucidation in terms of a plausible account of the distinction between form and content. It also needs be considered whether the inseparability of form and content motivates a theory of art or, less ambitiously, identifies an important criterion in an account of art.2 The inseparability thesis is traditionally associated with formalism, which, as a general theory of art, has been widely condemned. Nevertheless, formalism is currently making a comeback in particular philosophies of the arts-notably, philosophy of music and philosophy of film.3 Sophisticated formalism in relation both music and film allows for the aesthetic relevance of other features of the work besides form while recommending a structural focus for aesthetic appreciation. If the assumption that formalism is no longer relevant our understanding of the arts involves a major oversight, then the inseparability thesis cannot be ignored just because of its traditional association with formalism. But even if one persisted in this oversight, it does not warrant ignoring the importance of the inseparability thesis for the thesis bears no necessary relation any theory of art, including a formalist one. In what follows, I consider whether the inseparability thesis is compatible with aesthetic cognitivism, the view that art is valuable in part because it can give us nontrivial knowledge. Ultimately, I argue that the two are compatible because there are ways of learning from art that depend on the inseparability of form and content. Given the long and tangled history of the debate over the possibility and value of learning from art, it is supremely important recognize, finally, such compatibility. Against defenders of aesthetic cognitivism, skeptics and critics have regularly resorted brandishing the inseparability thesis, defiantly claiming that you cannot expect learn about the world from art if you cannot get to a work's content unaffected by style and medium. Here the assumption is that the kind of aesthetic transformation
Read full abstract