Abiding Vagueness:On Writing of Flight Julia Mueller (bio) The nebulous genre called "nature writing" often succumbs to a trouble William James diagnosed in Principles of Psychology when he surveyed the available written accounts of consciousness: All dumb or anonymous psychic states have . . . been coolly suppressed; or, if recognized at all, have been named after the substantive perception they led to, as thoughts 'about' this object or 'about' that, the stolid word about engulfing all their delicate idiosyncrasies in its monotonous sound. So that however passionately a writer may strive to honor what seems superlatively wild—tree, moth, lizard, bird, mountain, are nonetheless tamed in the writer's account by stiflingly "substantive" affection. The piece of writing is just 'about' it, immobilizing the wild being and the world in which it moves. It is difficult to get around a problem with words through words. I am searching for ways to write in movement of life in movement, so I have begun a poetics of prose nature writing. As a critical principle, I take up William James's particular inflection of linguistic skepticism, his distrust of language's ability to be faithful to the full range of experience, in all its "delicate idiosyncrasies." He is focused on human experience and consciousness (and the experience of consciousness), but he relies upon a few deep figures borrowed from elsewhere in the natural world, for instance the flow of water and the flight of birds. When James calls for a "reinstatement of the vague to its proper place in our mental life," I take this not only as transferable to a poetics of nature writing, but as a way of recognizing nature as native, not alien, to "mental life." The expanses of consciousness James suggests language "almost refuses": those are the mind in nature. James's skepticism about language was not prescriptive, but a description of what he took to be a limiting condition of language, into which writers might enter at their peril. As Richard Poirier observes in his synthesis of intellectual history and aesthetic criticism, Poetry and Pragmatism, James's complaint about the tendency of written language to stultify reality "is usually read simply as a prescription for change, when instead it describes a [End Page 177] situation which James knows probably cannot be changed . . . His strongest objection is reserved for a prevalent error in thinking which supposes that 'where there is no name'—where there is only 'something'—then 'no entity can exist.'" The passages of nature writing I offer as exemplary are not so because they transcend the limitations of their medium, but because the writers write in the knowledge and under the sign of limitation. They leave room for the vague in the form of their writing, which is not quite the same as writing vaguely—what's vague is something not caught by words, nor hunted down with them. It's hard to find a satisfying definition of what is distinguished by indefiniteness. The normal trajectory of defining, which is towards precision, comes up against a resistance in the very spirit of this word. For the oed, to define is "To determine the boundary or spatial extent of; to settle the limits of," or "To state exactly what (a thing) is" or "To set forth or explain what (a word or expression) means." Yet vague is, exactly and precisely, "Of words, language, etc.: Not precise or exact in meaning." It can also be "The vague or undefined expanse of something," for which the oed's example comes from John Ruskin's Lectures on Art: "The shadows lost or disregarded in the vague of space." There. It is an expanse, not a negative entity only. For James, "namelessness is compatible with existence," but why take the trouble to write of all the unnamable, nameless somethings? Why not be content to remain silent and use language only for that which answers readily to it, which meets it on its ground? Because these are not two separate realms of experience, the namable and the unnamable; they are inextricably bound up with each other. Because language has force and will cover over what is nameless rather than let it stand. As I...