Event Abstract Back to Event The miniature dipteran killer fly Coenosia attenuata exhibits adaptable aerial prey capture strategies. Trevor J. Wardill1*, Paloma T. Gonzalez-Bellido1*, Gervasio Tapia2, Hanchuan Peng3, 4 and Robert M. Olberg5 1 Marine Biological Laboratory, Program in Sensory Physiology and Behavior, United States 2 Instituto Andaluz de Investigación y Formación Agraria (IFAPA), Centro IFAPA La Mojonera, Spain 3 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Janelia Farm Research Campus, United States 4 Allen Institute for Brain Science, United States 5 Union College, Department of Biology, United States Catching insects on the wing requires visual speed, acuity and body maneuverability. This situation is exemplified by dragonflies, which exhibit a predatory behavior and sport the largest of all insect eyes. However, miniature killer flies (Coenosia species, 4 mm body length) also catch targets midflight. How do miniature killer flies accommodate the limits of a small compound eye and maximize the probability of prey capture? To answer this question we recorded, with calibrated dual high-speed video cameras, the predatory behavior of Coenosia attenuata and Coenosia tigrina in the wild (greenhouses) and in captivity (glass enclosure). We used natural (Drosophila sp.) and artificial (plastic bead on fishing line) targets to elicit the attack and reconstructed the prey and predator trajectories in 3D. Our results show that killer flies take off after items three times their own body size, indicating that they do not know the absolute size of the potential prey prior to the flight. Because we found that killer flies contrast and pursue prey against cluttered backgrounds in all directions, we expected them to employ classical pursuit. However, the flight trajectories obtained in the wild show that after takeoff, the killer fly path points towards the future location of its prey i.e. interception. More importantly, and unlike dragonflies and hoverflies, we found that killer flies adapt their strategy, switching between open and closed loop, interception, classical pursuit and gleaning. For example, killer flies are not known to employ gleaning in the wild, but this is the most common predatory strategy in small enclosed spaces. In summary, we show that Coenosia species are successful miniature predators with a vast and complex behavioral repertoire that rivals those of insects with much larger brains. Our future work will expand this line of work, to build a model that predicts the behavior. The killer fly statistics gathered (see killer facts box) will be employed to investigate the neural computations that allow the fast switches between the different attack strategies here reported. Figure 1 Keywords: Predatory Behavior, High-Speed Video, interception, 3D Trajectory, Gleaning Conference: International Conference on Invertebrate Vision, Fjälkinge, Sweden, 1 Aug - 8 Aug, 2013. Presentation Type: Oral presentation preferred Topic: The visual control of flight and locomotion Citation: Wardill TJ, Gonzalez-Bellido PT, Tapia G, Peng H and Olberg RM (2019). The miniature dipteran killer fly Coenosia attenuata exhibits adaptable aerial prey capture strategies.. Front. Physiol. Conference Abstract: International Conference on Invertebrate Vision. doi: 10.3389/conf.fphys.2013.25.00057 Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters. The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated. Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed. For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions. Received: 25 Feb 2013; Published Online: 09 Dec 2019. * Correspondence: Dr. Trevor J Wardill, Marine Biological Laboratory, Program in Sensory Physiology and Behavior, Woods Hole, MA, 02543, United States, twardill@umn.edu Dr. Paloma T Gonzalez-Bellido, Marine Biological Laboratory, Program in Sensory Physiology and Behavior, Woods Hole, MA, 02543, United States, paloma@mbl.edu Login Required This action requires you to be registered with Frontiers and logged in. To register or login click here. Abstract Info Abstract The Authors in Frontiers Trevor J Wardill Paloma T Gonzalez-Bellido Gervasio Tapia Hanchuan Peng Robert M Olberg Google Trevor J Wardill Paloma T Gonzalez-Bellido Gervasio Tapia Hanchuan Peng Robert M Olberg Google Scholar Trevor J Wardill Paloma T Gonzalez-Bellido Gervasio Tapia Hanchuan Peng Robert M Olberg PubMed Trevor J Wardill Paloma T Gonzalez-Bellido Gervasio Tapia Hanchuan Peng Robert M Olberg Related Article in Frontiers Google Scholar PubMed Abstract Close Back to top Javascript is disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser settings in order to see all the content on this page.
Read full abstract