Previous articleNext article No AccessNotes and CommentsNo Evidence for Selection in a Pheromonally Polymorphic Moth PopulationBengt O. Bengtsson and Christer LofstedtBengt O. Bengtsson Search for more articles by this author and Christer Lofstedt Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 136, Number 5Nov., 1990 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/285127 Views: 2Total views on this site Citations: 8Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1990 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Fotini A. Koutroumpa, Astrid T. Groot, Teun Dekker, David G. Heckel Genetic mapping of male pheromone response in the European corn borer identifies candidate genes regulating neurogenesis, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, no.4242 (Oct 2016).https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1610515113J. Tabata, Y. Ishikawa Genetic Basis Regulating the Sex Pheromone Blend in Ostrinia zealis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) and Its Allies Inferred From Crossing Experiments, Annals of the Entomological Society of America 104, no.22 (Mar 2011): 326–336.https://doi.org/10.1603/AN10124B. O. BENGTSSON, C. LÖFSTEDT Direct and indirect selection in moth pheromone evolution: population genetical simulations of asymmetric sexual interactions, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 90, no.11 (Jan 2007): 117–123.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00715.xTAKUMA TAKANASHI, YONGPING HUANG, K. RYO TAKAHASI, SUGIHIKO HOSHIZAKI, SADAHIRO TATSUKI, YUKIO ISHIKAWA Genetic analysis and population survey of sex pheromone variation in the adzuki bean borer moth, Ostrinia scapulalis, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 84, no.11 (Dec 2004): 143–160.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00421.xRing T. Cardé, Kenneth F. Haynes Structure of the pheromone communication channel in moths, (Jun 2004): 283–332.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542664.009CHARLES E. LINN JR, MARIA S. YOUNG, MATTHEW GENDLE, THOMAS J. GLOVER, WENDELL L. ROELOFS Sex pheromone blend discrimination in two races and hybrids of the European corn borer moth, Ostrinia nubilalis, Physiological Entomology 22, no.33 (Sep 1997): 212–223.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.1997.tb01161.xWilliam J. Bell, Larry R. Kipp, Robert D. Collins The Role of Chemo-orientation in Search Behavior, (Jan 1995): 105–152.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1765-8_4Michael J. Stanhope, Maureen M. Connelly, Brian Hartwick Evolution of a crustacean chemical communication channel: Behavioral and ecological genetic evidence for a habitat-modified, race-specific pheromone, Journal of Chemical Ecology 18, no.1010 (Oct 1992): 1871–1887.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02751110