Mitchel L. Zoler is with the Philadelphia bureau of Elsevier Global Medical News. ORLANDO — “Hospital readmissions” have become the latest bad-practice buzzwords out of Washington, and the American College of Cardiology is scrambling to put a lid on unnecessary readmissions. The ACC is alarmed because the worst readmissions offender in medicine is heart failure, linked to about one-third of all 30-day U.S. hospital readmissions, according to data collected by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. A 2008 report by the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission estimated that eliminating unnecessary hospital readmissions for heart failure could save Medicare $900 million annually. The stick that the CMS seems poised to wield against readmissions is bundling of reimbursement for Medicare beneficiaries. This would mean a hospital receives a fixed amount for all care for a hospitalized heart failure patient during the next 30 days, including subsequent readmissions. This prospect prodded the ACC to respond with a new program aimed at paring back readmissions through better attention to the handoff of the discharged. During a press briefing at the annual meeting of the ACC, Jack Lewin, MD, the college's CEO, announced the H2H program (www.acc.org/h2h/Enrollment/Default.aspx), an educational initiative in collaboration with the Institute for Healthcare Improvement. The program seeks to encourage better communication between the physicians who oversee heart failure patients while they're hospitalized and the community cardiologists, primary care physicians, and nurses who see patients once they're discharged. An immediate goal of the H2H program is to cut unnecessary readmissions for heart failure patients by 20% over the next 3 years, Dr. Lewin said. The ACC said it will seek involvement of other professional societies. The campaign against readmissions that the Obama administration, Congress, and the CMS are expected to launch “is a big deal. This is here to stay. This is where people will look, thinking that [readmissions] are low-hanging fruit,” Harlan M. Krumholz, MD, said at the meeting. “We need to think about patients, and be sure there are not unintended consequences that cause patients to suffer,” said Dr. Krumholz, professor of medicine, epidemiology, and public health at Yale University in New Haven, Conn. Dr. Krumholz conceded that until now “hospitals did not have any incentive to improve the transition of care, and so no one worked on it.” He recommended that the CMS give hospitals and other health care providers incentives to do a better job in getting discharged patients hooked into outpatient, disease-management programs. Working to reduce readmissions for heart failure is a practical and viable area, said Eric G. Tangalos, MD, CMD. “Intensive monitoring of the posthospital patient pays off more for heart failure than just about anything else. Nursing homes, especially if they are allowed to embrace the medical home model, will have the resources to do this. Nursing home care teams can keep people with [heart failure] out of the hospital. It just takes more monitoring, more resources, and more talent than what reimbursement now allows.” Dr. Tangalos, a primary care internal medicine consultant at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn., said that hospitals, nursing homes, and payers are “all on the same page regarding the issue of reducing readmissions. CMS and Congress are looking at eliminating some of the disincentives and implementing more constructive reasons to keep readmissions low.”
Read full abstract