Adverse Events Of Grade Research Articles

Safety profile of sacituzumab govitecan in patients with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

e13106 Background: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a first-in-class TROP-2-directed antibody conjugated to a topoisomerase inhibitor, has shown antitumor activity across various breast cancer (BC) subtypes. Following SG approval for metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and its broad use, understanding SG’ safety profile is crucial. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and tolerability of SG in patients with BC. Methods: We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases, and ASCO and ESMO websites for clinical trials assessing the safety of SG in BC patients. Outcomes of interest included treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade, grade 3/4, adverse events (AEs) leading to death, and AEs leading to SG dose reduction or discontinuation. All analyses were performed in R software (v.4.2.2) using random effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 test. Results: A total of 1,325 patients from six studies – three randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and three non-RCTs – were included. Median age of population ranged from 47 to 56 years. Most had metastatic disease (86%, n=1187), and triple-negative BC (48.6%, n=670). Regarding therapies, 798 patients received SG and 527 had treatment of physician's choice (TPC). In the pooled analysis of 748 patients on SG, the overall risk of AEs was 100% (95% CI 99-100%). The estimated risk of the most common all grade AEs were neutropenia (66%), anemia (44%), nausea (56%), vomiting (30%), fatigue (46%), constipation (17%), diarrhea (45%), and alopecia (46%), as described (Table). The risk of grade 3/4 AEs among 748 patients on SG was 55% (95% CI 36-74%). Neutropenia was the most important grade ≥3 AE, with a estimated frequency of 47%; followed by anemia and diarrhea, with an incidence of at 9% and 7%, respectively. The incidence of all other grade 3/4 AEs (e.g. anemia, vomiting, leukopenia, fatigue, constipation, and diarrhea) was below 10%. Dose reduction and discontinuation were observed in 14.4% and 2.9% of patients, respectively. Toxicity-related deaths occurred in six patients (0.4%). In a comparative sensitivity analysis of RCTs only, SG had significantly higher toxicity than TCPs, all grade AEs (OR 12.30 95%CI 1.68-89.87, p=0.01), and grade >3 AEs (OR 1.69 95%CI 1.25-2.28, p=0.0006). Conclusions: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, SG was associated with a high incidence of AEs. Neutropenia is a notable and potentially serious adverse event. Toxicity associated with SG may be addressed through close monitoring and early management. [Table: see text]

Association between heavy metal concentrations and chemotherapy-related acute adverse events in the patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A prospective, longitudinal, observational study.

e18045 Background: Chronic exposure to heavy metals may cause chronic burden on liver, kidney, bone marrow and other organs. To determine whether the accumulation of heavy metals prior to treatment was related to the occurrence of acute adverse events in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) receiving platinum-based chemotherapy, we conducted a single-center, prospective, longitudinal study. Methods: The heavy metal concentrations of pretreatment whole blood samples and the pretreatment and posttreatment morning urine samples for 140 NPC patients were measured, which were classified into low and high levels based on the 75% quartile. The highest grades of acute adverse events for every cycle of platinum-based chemotherapy were recorded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.03). Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the difference in the distribution of acute adverse events between two levels. To illustrate the potential relationship of metal between in blood and urine, the spearman’s correlation coefficient of metal concentration in blood and urine adjusted by creatinine was calculated. The kendal's correlation coefficients were calculated to characterize the correlation between heavy metal levels and acute adverse events. Finally, the study developed multivariable adjusted logistic regression models to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% CIs of the association between various heavy metals and risk of chemotherapy-related acute adverse events, respectively. Results: The study enrolled 140 patients with stage II (n=2, 1.4%), III (n=76, 54.3%), and IVa (n=62, 44.3%) NPC. A total of 13 heavy metals of both blood and urine samples were measured, with Cd, Pb, Hg, As, Pt, Mg, Ca, Cr, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, and Se included. The concentrations of the same metals in blood and urine (including Cd, Pb, Hg, As, Pt, Co and Se) had a moderate correlation (0.2 < correlation coefficient < 0.7). High level patients were prone to experiencing acute adverse events ( p<0.05). In multivariable adjusted logistic regression, patients with impaired liver function had higher BCd (Cd in blood) level (OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 1.38–9.64; p=0.009). Patients with thrombocytopenia had higher UCr (Cr in urine) level (OR, 5.63; 95% CI, 1.60–19.87; p=0.007). And UPb (OR, 3.16; 95% CI, 1.26–7.92; p=0. 014) and UZn (OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.10–6.59; p=0. 030) were found significantly higher in patients with abnormal blood glucose. Conclusions: NPC patients with chronic accumulation of BCd had tendency to have impaired liver function when receiving platinum-based chemotherapy. Similar correlations were also observed in the thrombocytopenia with UCr, and the abnormal blood glucose with UPb and UZn.

Predictive markers of complete pathological response to neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy in triple negative breast cancer.

e12650 Background: Results from the Keynote 522 clinical trial, which played a pivotal role in evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy (NAICT), showed a significant improvement in pathological complete response (pCR) rates compared with chemotherapy alone. To date, no significant markers have been identified to predict pathological complete response to NAICT. The primary objective was to identify markers, both molecular and clinical, predictive of pCR to NAICT in a real-world clinical setting. Methods: The retrospective analysis included 38 consecutively treated pts with early stage TNBC who received NAICT including pembrolizumab at the Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana (OIL) between 4 January 2022 and 17 October 2023. Data collected from electronic medical records included tumour size, nodal status, UICC stage, BRCA status, systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) before NAICT and before surgery, and frequency and grade of immune-related adverse events (iAEs) (according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5). In pts who completed surgical treatment, response to treatment was assessed by pathological examination of post-treatment surgical specimens. Descriptive statistical methods were used to summarise and describe the main characteristics. Pearson chi-squared test was used to analyse categorical variables and t-test to evaluate associations between continuous variables. Results: Of the 38 pts, 28 completed surgical treatment and were further analysed. Pathohistological examination of post-treatment surgical specimens revealed pCR in 11 pts (39.3%), with residual disease in 17 pts (60.7%). Of the 17 pts without pCR, 11 pts had RCB score 2 (64.7%) and 5 pts had score 3 (29.4%). The distribution of size, nodal status, UICC stage at diagnosis, BRCA status, frequency of iAEs in correlation with pCR is shown in the Table. A borderline correlation was found between pCR and SII at the start of pembrolizumab treatment (p=0.05). Age, tumour size, nodal status, UICC stage, BRCA status, AEs, SII before surgery were not found to be predictive of pCR. Conclusions: SII at the start of pembrolizumab was found to be a borderline significant marker predictive of pCR. Other characteristics evaluated did not correlate with pCR. [Table: see text]

The Effecacy and Safety of Daratumumab Based Regimens in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Single-Center Real-World Data Analysis

To investigate the efficacy and safety of daratumumab based regimens in relapse and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the real world, as well as the impact of daratumumab on stem cell collection and engraftment. The clinical data of patients with RRMM who received daratumumab in hematology department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University from February 2019 to March 2023 and had evaluable efficacy were retrospective analysis. All 43 RRMM patients were treated with daratumumab-based combination regimens, including Dd, DVd, DRd, Dkd, DId, and Dara-DECP. With median follow-up time 10.1 (2.1-36.6) months, the best overall response rate (ORR) was 74.4% and a best complete response rate (CR) was 25.6%. 1-year overall survival rate (OS) was 84.5%. The most common severe hematologic adverse events (Grade>3) are 3/4 grade leukopenia（18.6%）, and the most common severe non-hematologic adverse events were infusion-related reactions (IRRs， 20.9%) and infections（7.0%）. Multivariate prognostic analysis showed that extramedullary infiltration was an independent adverse prognostic factor affecting OS （P =0.004）. The use of daratumumab has no effect on stem cell collection, or engraftment. Daratumumab is safe and effective in RRMM.

Preliminary safety, efficacy and molecular characterization of emavusertib (CA-4948) in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with FLT3 mutation (FLT3m).

6539 Background: AML is a heterogenous disease and exhibits a dynamic mutational landscape as the disease progresses. Internal tandem duplication (ITD) of FLT3 is considered an acquired late-event mutation and is associated with a poor prognosis in AML. Emavusertib is a potent oral inhibitor of both IRAK4 and FLT3, conferring potential dual efficacy advantages compared to other IRAK4 or FLT3 inhibitors as single agents. IRAK4 is upregulated during anti-FLT3- or other cytotoxic therapies, which drives a resistance pathway of early relapse and progression. Methods: The safety, clinical activity, and potential biomarkers of emavusertib in R/R AML and higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome are being investigated in the ongoing open-label, Phase 1/2a TakeAim Leukemia trial (NCT04278768). Next generation sequencing (NGS) of 68 genes was performed on genomic DNA from bone marrow or peripheral blood mononuclear cells at baseline and on treatment. Here, we present preliminary safety, efficacy data and molecular characterization in a subset of enrolled AML patients who carried FLT3m at baseline and were treated with emavusertib monotherapy. Results: In this study, we treated 11 R/R AML patients with FLT3m at dose levels of 200-400 mg BID. The median number of prior anti-cancer therapies was 2 (range 1-6). 8 of 11 patients had prior exposure to FLT3 inhibitors. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) Grade ≥ 3 were reported in 2 of 11 (18%) patients. All responders were dosed at the Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of 300 mg BID and with < 3 lines of prior therapy. In addition, responders demonstrated more than 90% bone marrow blast reduction compared to baseline. The most common co-mutations in this subset of patients included RUNX1, NRAS, and TET2. Emavusertib treatment significantly decreased the variant allele frequency of these mutations. FLT3-ITD levels were decreased or became undetectable in responders. Additional corelative analysis between bone marrow blast counts and mutation status indicates that AML patients with FLT3m demonstrated increased bone marrow blast reductions (P≤0.05) on emavusertib treatment, when compared to FLT3 WT AML patients. Conclusions: Emavusertib has a favorable safety and tolerability profile in pretreated AML patients with FLT3m and demonstrated monotherapy anti-cancer activity in patients with FLT3m, including patients who have progressed on prior FLT3 inhibitors. Mutational profiles are suggestive of disease-modifying activity of emavusertib. We will present updated safety and efficacy data, including data for patients who proceeded to stem cell transplant. Enrollment in this ongoing trial is continuing at RP2D in patients with < 3 lines of prior anti-cancer therapies. Clinical trial information: NCT04278768 .

The effect of HER2-targeted inhibitors as second-line or later-line regimens in the treatment of HER2-positive advanced colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

e15542 Background: To systematically evaluate and meta-analyze the efficacy and safety of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 Inhibitor (HER2 Inhibitor) as a second-line or later-line antitumor regimen in the treatment of HER2-positive advanced colorectal cancer and provides a new method to treat metastatic colorectal cancer who failed with first-line treatment. Methods: Literature focusing on the use of HER2-targeted inhibitors in the treatment of HER2-positive mCRC was downloaded from Pubmed, Web of Science, EMBASE and Google Scholar databases from January 1, 2019 to October 31, 2022, and the final included articles were determined by screening and relevant data were extracted, including Objective Response Rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), Progression-Free-Survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS), and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (Grade 3/4 adverse events). Binary variables were compared using 95% confidence intervals (CI) and odds ratios (OR); for continuous variables, heterogeneity was checked using Cochran's Q Test (p values and I²) and Weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% CI. P < 0.05 or I² > 50% denote statistical significance, and results were combined using a random-effects model. The efficacy and safety of adding HER2-targeted inhibitors in treating HER2-positive mCRC were further discussed using the above methods. Results: The systematic review and meta-analysis included 17 studies with a total of 267 patients, with an overall DCR of 57% (95% CI: 43%-70%), an ORR of 29% (95% CI: 21%-37%), a median OS of 13.11 months (95% CI: 10.57-15.64), a median PFS of 4.40 months (95% CI: 3.64-5.15), and SAEs of 20% (95% CI: 0.11-0.29). The efficacy of the second-line and later-line treatment was significantly better than that of the well-known EPIC study, ML18147 study, CONCUR study and FRESCO-2 study. Conclusions: Systematic review and meta-analysis show that HER2-targeted inhibitors as second-line or later-line regimens demonstrate ideal antitumor efficacy and safety in HER2-positive mCRC, which is better than the standard regimen without anti-HER2 therapy. Specifically, the new ADC drug (A antibody-drug Conjugate, ADC) should be able to improve the treatment effect of these patients more effectively. Therefore, HER2-targeted inhibitors can effectively improve the efficacy of second-line and later-line therapy for HER2-positive mCRC. Furthermore, it is still worth exploring its therapeutic effects application as first-line therapy, which is expected to offer new strategies for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of HER2-positive advanced colorectal cancer.

Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with tislelizumab and lenvatinib for initial unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus: A prospective, single-arm phase II trial.

4103 Background: The combination of immune checkpoint blockade and multikinase inhibitor has been proven to improve clinical outcomes of advanced HCC. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy is an intra-arterial procedure that has been widely used in Asia, with high response rate. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HAIC combined with tislelizumab and lenvatinib for initial unresectable HCC with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). Methods: This is a prospective, single-arm phase II study. Patients with histologically or cytologically diagnosed or clinically confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma and accompanied by PVTT, no previous systemic treatment were eligible for inclusion. Patients received HAIC(FOLOFOX), combined with intravenous tislelizumab (200mg, q3w) and lenvatinib (8/12mg, qd) for six cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with tislelizumab and lenvatinib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST. Results: Between Sep, 2021 to Nov, 2023, a total of 29 eligible patients were enrolled and evaluable for efficacy analyses: median age 54 years (M/F:25/4; CNLC stage IIIa/IIIb: 24/ 5). Portal vein tumor thrombus PVTT Ⅰ-Ⅱ/PVTT Ⅲ-Ⅳ:19/10. An average of 4.35 times of HAIC were underwent in these patients. With a median follow-up of 11 months (interquartile range [IQR] 7.5-21.5), the confirmed ORR was 68.97% (95%CI 49.19-84.72)and 58.62%(95%CI 38.94-76.48)per mRECIST and RECIST v1.1, respectively. The disease control rate (DCR) according to mRECIST and RECIST v1.1 were both 93.10% (95%CI 77.23-99.15). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15 months (95%CI 10-22). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached. 7(24.1%) patients became eligible for surgical resection. 1 of them received surgical resection and was confirmed as pathological CR; 6 of them refused surgical treatment and received tislelizumab and lenvatinib treatment continuously. 27(93.1%) patients had mild treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) (grade 0-2). Common TRAEs included hypoproteinemia (93.10%), abdominal pain (72.41%), nausea (68.97%) and leukopenia (65.52%). There were no deaths due to TRAEs. Conclusions: HAIC (FOLOFOX) combined with tislelizumab and lenvatinib afforded promising efficacy and safety in tumor control in patients with advanced HCC with PVTT in short-term observation and an eligible surgical conversion rate was observed. Clinical trial information: CHiCTR2100051717.

Neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiation plus PD1 blockade for locally advanced rectal cancer: Results of a phase 2, open-label, randomized controlled trial.

3611 Background: Several single-arm trials have reported pathological complete response (pCR) rates of 23-50% after combining neoadjuvant radiotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We aim to further clarify the efficacy and safety of adding PD1 inhibitors to the neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiation of LARC patients with this phase 2, randomized, controlled trial. Methods: Patients with mid-low, locally advanced rectal cancer were randomly allocated to receive neoadjuvant chemoradiation plus concurrent Tislelizumab (experiment group A), or neoadjuvant chemoradiation plus sequential Tislelizumab (experiment group B), or neoadjuvant chemoradiation only (control group). Patients of all three groups are scheduled to receive radical surgery after neoadjuvant treatment. The primary endpoint is pCR rate. Results: A total of 186 patients were enrolled. In the modified intention-to-treat population, which consist of patients having received chemoradiation and at least 1 cycle of PD1 blockade for the experiment groups and patients having received chemoradiation only for the control group, the pCR rates were 33.9% and 34.5% for experiment group A and B respectively, both significantly higher than the pCR rate of 15.5% in the control group (p=0.021 and 0.019). There were no significant differences between either one of the experiment groups and the control group regarding disease progression rate, grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse event rate and grade 3-4 surgical complication rate. Conclusions: For patients with mid-low locally advanced rectal cancer, the addition of PD1 inhibitors to neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiation, whether concurrently or sequentially, increases pCR rate, meanwhile raises no significant safety concerns. For the next step, phase 3 trials with larger sample sizes are encouraged. Clinical trial information: NCT05245474 .

A phase 1, open-label, dose escalation, and expansion study of CUE-102, a novel WT1-pHLA-IL2-Fc fusion protein, in patients with HLA-A*0201-positive disease and WT1-positive recurrent/metastatic cancers.

3553 Background: Immuno-STATs are modular fusion proteins designed for the selective activation of tumor antigen specific CD8+ T cells. CUE-102, the second Immuno-STAT in clinical trials, is composed of a human leukocyte antigen (HLA) complex, HLA-A*0201, a peptide epitope derived from the Wilms Tumor 1 (WT1) protein, and 4 molecules of reduced affinity human interleukin-2 (IL-2). In preclinical studies CUE-102 binds, activates and expands WT1-specific CD8+ T cells with the potential to enhance anti-tumor immunity in patients with WT1+ cancers. Here we present the results of the dose-finding portion (Part A) of the CUE-102-01 study. Methods: CUE-102-01 is a 2 part phase 1 study. HLA-A*02:01 positive patients with WT1+ advanced colorectal (CRC), gastric (GA) and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), pancreatic (PDAC) or ovarian (OvCa) tumors refractory to standard therapies were eligible for participation. WT1 status is determined by IHC via central testing. CUE-102 monotherapy was administered intravenously every three weeks in doses ranging from 1 mg/kg to 8 mg/kg following 3+3 design rules with a Bayesian Logistic Regression Model overlay. Dose levels that exhibit an immune or tumor response may be expanded to further characterize activity and toxicity as allowed by safety rules. Results: Dose escalation was successfully completed in 28 patients with CRC (17), PDAC (6), GA/GEJ (3) and OvCa (2). No DLTs were observed. Three dose levels (2, 4 and 8 mg/kg) exhibited evidence of immune activity and were expanded up to 9 patients each for further evaluation. CUE-102 was well-tolerated with > 96% of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) grade ≤2. The most common TRAEs, were fatigue, infusion reactions, nausea and vomiting. There were no cases of CRS Grade ≥ 2. Preliminary PK data demonstrate dose dependent increases in exposure across the dose range assessed. Preliminary analysis of patient samples demonstrates selective expansion of WT1-specific CD8+ T cells. Stable disease of ≥ 6 weeks (range 6-36 weeks), as determined by RECIST 1.1, has been observed in 10 of 23 patients (DCR 43.5%). Conclusions: CUE-102 is a novel T cell engager that demonstrates acceptable tolerability, favorable PK, and supportive preliminary PD readouts. No DLTs or drug-related SAEs have been observed in doses up to 8 mg/kg as of the data cut-off. Adverse events have been manageable and consistent with the CUE-102 mechanism of action and underlying disease. Early signs of disease stabilization and anti-tumor activity in late-stage patients are encouraging. Part B is a dose expansion that further evaluates safety, PK/PD, recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), antitumor efficacy and is currently enrolling patients. Clinical trial information: NCT05360680 .

A phase II clinical evaluation of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with regorafenib and toripalimab in patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastases.

3566 Background: In several clinical studies, the combination of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) antibodies with targeted antiangiogenic agents has demonstrated clinical benefits for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, individuals with liver metastases have shown suboptimal responses. Prior preclinical study indicates a synergistic efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) when employed in conjunction with immunotherapy. The study aimed to explore whether RFA combined with regorafenib and toripalimab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) could provide better outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases. Methods: Using Simon's two-stage design, a total of 32 subjects were required for enrollment, with10 subjects included in stage 1. If there were no or less patients having response, the study would be terminated; otherwise, it would proceed to stage 2, enrolling an additional 22 subjects. The cohort consisted of 10 microsatellite stable (MSS) mCRC patients with multiple liver metastases who had previously failed fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, with or without targeted therapy. RFA was performed on a single hepatic lesion, with others designated as target lesions. Treatment with regorafenib and toripalimab commenced one week post-RFA, following a 4-week cycle. Toripalimab was administered intravenously biweekly, and regorafenib was given orally at daily dose of 80 mg (three weeks on, one week off, in a 4-week period). The primary endpoint was response rate. Results: Ten patients (3 women) were enrolled in this study, with ages ranging from 26 to 76 years (median: 52 years), and 60% being 52 years or older.Seventy percent had ECOG performance status (PS) of 0; 60% had primary colon tumors; 90% presented with synchronous liver metastases, and 80% had both intrahepatic and extrahepatic metastases. Half of the participants achieved stable disease; however, none exhibited confirmed partial or complete responses. The median progression-free survival was 3.3 months, and the median overall survival reached 11.3 months. The median number of cycles was two (range: 0.5 to 3), with 60% undergoing at least two cycles. Adverse events (AEs) included hand-foot syndrome, liver dysfunction, fatigue, abdominal distension, and thrombocytopenia. The most frequently reported AE was hand-foot syndrome, occurring in 50% of patients. Serious AEs (grade≥3) potentially related to treatment included hand-foot syndrome and hyperbilirubinemia, each with an incidence of 10%. Notably, one patient experienced hyperprogression during immunotherapy. Conclusions: The combination of RFA, regorafenib, and toripalimab has not shown encouraging efficacy in patients with CRC liver metastases. However, the observed safety profile is acceptable. Clinical trial information: NCT05485909 .

A phase I dose escalation trial of BCD-145 in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.

9526 Background: BCD-145 (nurulimab) is a fully human IgG1 mAb with modified Fc-fragment (the 1st Gln is replaced by Glu in the heavy chain sequence, and there is no terminal dipeptide composed by Gly and Lys residues) that binds to cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and blocks the interaction between CTLA-4 and its ligands. This allows to stimulate T-cell proliferation, cytokine production and induces antitumor immune response. Here we present the results of multicenter open-label single-arm multi-cohort phase I trial of pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, and immunogenicity of BCD-145 in pts with unresectable/metastatic melanoma (unr/mM). Methods: BCD-145 monotherapy in 3+3 dose escalation [0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10 mg/kg intravenously Q3W] was given to 15 pts with unr/mM with measurable disease, who had failed prior therapy, ECOG 0-2. Pts with brain mts, previous therapy with aCTLA-4 and/or aPD-1/PD-L1 drugs were not allowed. The main objective of the study was to evaluate PK, PD, tolerability, immunogenicity, safety, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) identification. Secondary objectives included tumor response rate (irRECIST). Results: BCD-145 proved safety and overall was well tolerated. DLT and MTD were not reached. Any grade (Gr) adverse events (AEs) occurred in 100% (15/15) of pts. 33.3% (5/15) of pts had AE/SAE of Gr 3-4, including hypertension Gr 3 (1 at 1 mg/kg), hypercalcemia Gr 4 (2 at 1 mg/kg), hypokalemia Gr 3 (2 at 1 mg/kg), neutropenia Gr 3 (1 at 0.3 mg/kg), anemia Gr 3 (1 at 1 mg/kg), lung infection Gr 3 with hospitalization (1 at 1 mg/kg). Only 2 pts had a treatment-related AE Gr 3-4. Immuno-related AE were identified in 46.7% (7/15), manifested by symptoms of thyroiditis (mainly Gr 1) and diarrhea Gr 2 (1 at 10 mg/kg). There was 1 death (at 1 mg/kg) due to progression. There is dose-dependent peak study drug serum concentrations and systemic exposure. Two dosage regimens (1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg Q3W) allowed to achieve the optimal concentration. BCD-145 increased subpopulations of activated HLA-DR+ CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, CD4+ICOS+ T-lymphocytes, absolute lymphocyte counts in all cohorts without significant differences. Binding and neutralizing Abs against BCD-145 were detected in 2 pts from different dose cohorts (0.3 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg). PR and SD were registered in 2 pts of each response group. 30.8% of pts achieved disease control, which is consistent with published data on other CTLA-4 inhibitors. A dose of 1 mg/kg is determined as recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Conclusions: BCD-145 demonstrated a tolerable safety profile and preliminary anti-tumor activity in pts with unr/mM. Anti-tumor effects of BCD-145 were observed in pts who had progressed on prior treatment. Further co-targeting PD-1 and CTLA-4 simultaneously will achieve a better anti-tumor activity due to cooperative binding to exhausted T-cell subsets. Clinical trial information: NCT03472027 .

Naxitamab-related adverse events within and across treatment cycles in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) high-risk neuroblastoma.

10032 Background: Anti-GD2 monoclonal antibodies, including naxitamab, for the treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma (HRNB) are associated with adverse events (AEs), though few studies have characterized their frequency and patterns of presentation. A practical understanding of AEs can help clinicians expect and manage those requiring intervention. In this post hoc analysis, we report the frequency and severity of naxitamab-related AEs across infusions and treatment cycles, based on data from a prespecified interim analysis of Trial 201. Methods: Trial 201 (phase 2, NCT03363373) is investigating naxitamab plus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in patients with R/R HRNB with residual disease in bone/bone marrow only. Patients with soft tissue or actively progressing disease were excluded. Naxitamab was infused at 3 mg/kg/dose IV on Days (D) 1/3/5 with GM-CSF administered SC on Days -4 to 5 (monthly cycles [C]). Patients (N=74) were evaluated for safety (CTCAE v4.0), with frequency defined as % of patients reporting >1 events. Frequency of AEs of Grade ≥3 were evaluated for C1-C5. Results: Most (81%) naxitamab-related AEs were Grade 1 or 2. Grade ≥3 AEs reported in ≥10% of patients were hypotension (60% of patients), pain (54%), urticaria (19%), bronchospasm (18%), and abdominal pain (16%). The frequency of related hypotension Grade ≥3 (Grade 4, n=3) decreased across cycles, from C1 (47%) to C5 (33%) and across infusions, from C1D1 (43%) to C1D3 (18%) and C1D5 (11%). Similar decreases were seen during C2 to C5. Among patients with Grade ≥3 hypotension, 73% had their first event C1D1, of whom 34% and 31% had their second event C1D3 or C2D1, respectively. The frequency of related pain Grade 3 AEs (all preferred terms with word “pain”) decreased from C1 (53%) to C2 (37%), generally stabilizing thereafter with frequencies consistent across infusions. Most (77%) had their first event C1D1, of whom 82% had a second event C1D3. The frequency of related bronchospasm Grade 3 (no Grade 4 AEs) was relatively stable around 7% from C1 to C3, decreasing to 4% and 2% in C4 and C5, respectively. Patients generally experienced these events on D1 infusions with few reported D3 or D5. No consistent pattern was seen for Grade 3 urticaria. None of the Grade ≥3 AEs of hypotension, urticaria, pain or bronchospasm resulted in treatment discontinuation. Conclusions: The frequency of naxitamab related Grade ≥3 AEs changed over the course of therapy. Hypotension was most frequent C1D1, decreasing across infusions and cycles. Pain frequency peaked C1 and decreased in subsequent cycles, remaining stable across infusions. Bronchospasm events, though relatively rare, generally occurred D1 and decreased across infusions. The results underline the importance of initial and ongoing monitoring within and across cycles to ensure appropriate and timely management. Clinical trial information: NCT03363373 .

Phase 3 randomized study of isatuximab (Isa) plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) with bortezomib versus isard in patients with newly diagnosed transplant ineligible multiple myeloma (NDMM TI).

7501 Background: CD38 targeting immunotherapy is approved in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in NDMM TI and considered the current standard of care (SOC). The best treatment combinations are important in NDMM TI, as outcomes worsen with successive line of therapy. To improve current SOC, we evaluated the added value of prolonged use of bortezomib for 18 months with reduced intensity weekly schedule to IsaRd, with the intent to demonstrate the impact of a PI in a quadruplet regimen to improve depth of response. In BENEFIT/IFM2020-05 study (NCT04751877), we investigated efficacy and safety of IsaRd vs Isa-VRd in NDMM TI. Methods: BENEFIT is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, parallel trial. Patients aged 65-79, non-frail, with NDMM TI were randomized 1:1 and stratified by age, high-risk cytogenetic and center. Isa-VRd arm received V (1.3 mg/m2 SC weekly up to c12 (c), bimonthly up to c18); both arms received Isa (10 mg/kg IV weekly and bimonthly up to c12, then monthly), R (25 mg), and d (20 mg up to c12). The primary endpoint was minimal residual disease (MRD) 10-5 negative rate (NGS) at 18 months from treatment start analyzed in ITT. Key secondary endpoints included survival times (OS, PFS, EFS, TTNT), response rates and durations, MRD endpoints, and safety (using NCI CTCAE v5.0). Results: At data cutoff date (02 Feb 2024), 270 patients (135 per arm) were recruited. Patients baseline characteristics were well balanced across arms, overall median age was 73.2 years [IQR. 71;76], 90 patients (33%) were >75 years, 23 (9%) had high-risk cytogenetic (IFM score >1), 181 (76%) had R-ISS2+3, and 47 (17%) had impaired renal function (eGFR <60 mL/min). MRD negativity rates at 10-5 at 18 months were significantly higher in Isa-VRd arm compared to IsaRd arm (47% vs 24%, OR for negative MRD =2.96 [95%CI. 1.73 – 5.07, p<0.001]. The MRD benefit was consistent across subgroups. At 21.2 months median follow-up, 33 (12%) patients had relapsed and 20 (7%) had died, and no significant difference were observed across arms, yet. The addition of weekly “light” schedule of bortezomib did not significantly affect relative dose intensity of IsaRd. Forty-four (33%) patients presented with neurological adverse events grade ≥2 in the Isa-VRd vs 27 (20%) in IsaRd arm. Conclusions: Isa-VRd significantly deepened responses including a significant increase of the MRD negative rate at 10-5 vs IsaRd. The safety profile is consistent with addition of bortezomib. This study supports Isa-VRd as a new standard of care for NDMM TI non-frail patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04751877 . [Table: see text]

Intralesional nivolumab in oral potentially malignant disorders: A phase 1 pilot study on safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy.

6016 Background: Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders (OPMD) encompass a diverse group of oral mucosal diseases, including the prevalent oral leukoplakia (OL), serving as precursors to invasive oral squamous cell carcinoma. OPMD exhibits an annual malignant transformation rate up to 36%. Despite the breadth of research on OPMD the standard-of-care remains surgery or observation. We aim to evaluate the safety and tolerability of intralesional injections of Nivolumab in patients with OPMD. Secondary objectives include assessing objective response rate and pathologic complete response rate. We describe the results of an immune prevention trial designed to avoid systemic toxicities of immunotherapy in patient with pre-malignancy by administrating aPD1 intralesionaly. Methods: Phase 1, single-arm, open-label, dose-escalation pilot study that involves intralesional injections of Nivolumab (index lesion) in patients with high-risk OPMD lesions every 3 weeks (total of 4 doses, 12 weeks). Non-index, non-injected, oral lesion(s) were also documented and monitored. The study includes two dose cohorts (10 mg and 20 mg) to assess maximally tolerated dose with a 3 + 6 dose-escalation design. Adverse events were reported according to NCI CTCAE Version 5.0. Serial biopsies at baseline and up to 8 weeks after treatment were taken to assess efficacy using a composite score (i.e., size and degree of dysplasia) in index lesion. Major response was defined as >80% decrease in score; partial response as 40%-80% decrease. Freshly frozen tumors were subjected to RNA sequencing and gene pathway analysis to identify biomarkers of response or progression. Results: At the time of data analysis, 13 patients have completed treatment (61.5% males), both dose levels were well tolerated. The adverse event grades ranged from grade 1 (i.e. diarrhea, elevated LFT and skin rash) constituting the majority at 80.5% of reported adverse events, grade 2 (i.e. skin rash, cellulitis) at 13.9%, and grade 3 (i.e. hypertension) at 5.6%. Ten patients had multifocal disease. Major response was observed in 22.5% and partial response in 50% of the patients. One patient progressed to invasive SCC in a non-index lesion. RNA sequencing based immune phenotyping revealed increased infiltration of CD8 cytotoxic T cells in index lesions after treatment. Pathway analysis revealed significant alterations in immune pathways including Th1 and Th2 pathways, Natural killer and immunoregulatory pathways. Spatial transcriptome analysis and pharmacokinetics data are pending. Conclusions: Intralesional nivolumab is well tolerated in OPMD with suggested potential biological and clinical activity. A randomized phase II trial to assess cancer free survival is recommended to determine the efficacy in preventing cancer progression. We recommend dose of 20mg for phase II as it was well tolerated. Clinical trial information: NCT05327270 .

Phenotyping Hepatic Immune-Related Adverse Events in the Setting of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy.

We present and validate a rule-based algorithm for the detection of moderate to severe liver-related immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in a real-world patient cohort. The algorithm can be applied to studies of irAEs in large data sets. We developed a set of criteria to define hepatic irAEs. The criteria include: the temporality of elevated laboratory measurements in the first 2-14 weeks of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment, steroid intervention within 2 weeks of the onset of elevated laboratory measurements, and intervention with a duration of at least 2 weeks. These criteria are based on the kinetics of patients who experienced moderate to severe hepatotoxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grades 2-4). We applied these criteria to a retrospective cohort of 682 patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma and treated with ICI. All patients were required to have baseline laboratory measurements before and after the initiation of ICI. A set of 63 equally sampled patients were reviewed by two blinded, clinical adjudicators. Disagreements were reviewed and consensus was taken to be the ground truth. Of these, 25 patients with irAEs were identified, 16 were determined to be hepatic irAEs, 36 patients were nonadverse events, and two patients were of indeterminant status. Reviewers agreed in 44 of 63 patients, including 19 patients with irAEs (0.70 concordance, Fleiss' kappa: 0.43). By comparison, the algorithm achieved a sensitivity and specificity of identifying hepatic irAEs of 0.63 and 0.81, respectively, with a test efficiency (percent correctly classified) of 0.78 and outcome-weighted F1 score of 0.74. The algorithm achieves greater concordance with the ground truth than either individual clinical adjudicator for the detection of irAEs.

Effectiveness and safety of first-line serplulimab in patients with metastatic/locally advanced esophageal carcinoma (EC): A real-world study.

e16044 Background: The prognosis of metastatic/locally advanced EC has significantly improved with the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Serplulimab has been approved in the treatment of various solid tumors (e.g. esophageal squamous cell carcinoma [ESCC], small cell lung cancer). Considering the lack of real-world evidence, this study aimed to explore the real-world effectiveness and safety of serplulimab as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic/locally advanced EC. Methods: Thismulticenterretrospective study included patients with metastatic/locally advanced EC who received first-line serplulimab-containing therapy from March 2022 to December 2023. The demographic and disease characteristics, chemotherapy regimens selected by physicians, treatment response and adverse events were collected from medical record. The outcomes included progression free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DoR), time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) and safety. Results: A total of 57 patients were included, 45 (78.9%) were male with a mean age of 68 years. A majority of patients had ESCC (n=40, 70.2%) and metastatic disease (n=35, 61.4%). The most common chemotherapy regimens combined with serplulimab were paclitaxel plus cisplatin (n=27, 39.1%) and etoposide and platinum (n=13, 23.6%). With a median follow-up of 4.8 month (range: 0.7-19.7), the median PFS was 7.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.7-11.1). The ORR and DCR were 22.8% and 96.5% in all patients, respectively. The median DoR and TTD were 4.7 months (95% CI: 4.3-not estimated [NE]) and 13.9 months (95% CI: 3.6-24.1), respectively, while the median OS was not reached (NR). The mPFS was 11.1 months (95% CI: 7.0-NE) in patients with ESCC, which was numerically longer than those with neuroendocrine carcinoma (6.5 months, 95% CI: 5.8-7.3, P=0.052). Other effectiveness outcomes in ESCC are presented in Table. Patients > 65 years had a significant improved mPFS compare to those ≤ 65 years (5.9 vs. 11.1 months, P=0.001). The rate of any grade adverse events (AEs) was 26.3% (n=15), while grade 3 or higher AEs was 10.5% (n=6), thrombocytopenia (7.0%, n=4), myelosuppression and pulmonary infection (both 5.3%, n=3) being the most common. Conclusions: First-line serplulimab combined with chemotherapy demonstrated promising effectiveness and favorable safety profile in patients with metastatic/locally advanced EC, especially in ESCC. The current real-world evidence indicates that serplulimab combined with chemotherapy could provide survival benefit for patients with advanced first-line EC. [Table: see text]

Evaluation of drug tolerability as a function of toxicity and quality of life in patients enrolled on I-SPY2.

11113 Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are valuable for understanding treatment tolerability and toxicity. I-SPY2 is a phase-II neoadjuvant clinical trial for breast cancer with electronic PROs and quality of life (QOL) assessments. We sought to understand how well the GP5 self-reported tolerability item reflected toxicity burden and QOL during treatment and follow-up in I-SPY 2 participants. Methods: Our study included 306 patients who completed the FACIT Item GP5 and answered PROMIS surveys at two or more timepoints. Analysis timepoints included screening (SC), inter-regimen (IR), pre-surgery (PS), 1-month post-surgery (FU1), and 6-months post-surgery (FU2). Symptoms were assessed weekly using PRO-CTCAE and CTCAEv4.0. QOL was evaluated using PROMIS. The GP5: “I am bothered by side effects of treatment,” was used to estimate tolerability, where worse tolerability is a higher score. Odds ratios, Spearman correlation, and regularized multi-variate regression were used to evaluate the associations between individual symptoms and adverse events with GP5 scores. Results: Demographic information was available for 243 of the 306 (70.2%) participants (median age=47,73.7% white). In the 306, tolerability scores worsened over study treatment, with a maximum mean score of 1.71 at Cycle 11. Tolerability improved after treatment cessation at FU1(1.09). Mean tolerability at week 6 was 1.53. The only clinical factor that was associated with early change in tolerability (week 6 to PS) was age >50 (mean score ranged from 1.55-1.70 vs 1.29-1.45 (age<50), p<0.05). PRO-CTCAE and GP5 correlative analysis suggested that higher grade abdominal pain, decreased appetite, dizziness and blurry vision significantly associated with higher GP5 scores at multiple timepoints (p<0.05). Symptoms not associated with tolerability were nail loss, acne, hair loss, and rash (p>0.05). Additionally, the total number of low-grade (mild to moderate) symptoms a patient experienced during study treatment was significantly correlated to poor tolerability (p<0.00001). Among patients with CTCAE data, 9% had adrenal insufficiency, and higher GP5 was found across all study timepoints in those with (compared to without) adrenal insufficiency (mean GP5 = [1.7-1.9] vs [1.3-1.5] respectively). Similarly, among patients with neuropathy (14%), higher GP5 scores were reported across all study timepoints (mean GP5 = [1.8-2.3] vs [1.3-1.5] respectively). Higher GP5 scores during treatment were correlated with higher fatigue scores at PS and FU1 (p<0.02 and p<0.001) and lower physical functioning at PS (p<0.01). Conclusions: TheGP5 measure is associated with self-reported symptoms, higher grade adverse events and quality of life scores. Furthermore, greater accumulation of lower grade symptoms can lead to poor tolerability. The single measure GP5 composite score reflects multiple components of treatment toxicity.

Baseline (BL) characteristics and efficacy endpoints for patients (pts) with node-negative (N0) HR+/HER2− early breast cancer (EBC): NATALEE trial.

512 Background: NATALEE assessed ribociclib (RIB) + non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) vs NSAI alone in pts with HR+/HER2− EBC at increased risk of recurrence, including pts with N0 disease, and showed a statistically significant invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) benefit. We report BL characteristics, efficacy, and safety for the N0 subgroup. Methods: Pts with stage II/III HR+/HER2− EBC were randomized (R) 1:1 to RIB 400 mg/d (3 wk on/1 wk off for 36 mo) + NSAI (letrozole or anastrozole for ≥60 mo) or NSAI alone. Men and premenopausal women received goserelin. Pts could receive any standard (neo)adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) ≤12 mo before randomization. In the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, 78% of pts completed 3y of RIB treatment (tx) or discontinued early with 21% still on tx at the time of this analysis (data cutoff: July 21, 2023; median follow up, 33 mo). The N0 subgroup included pts with T2N0 (stage IIA; with grade [G]3, or G2 disease and Ki-67 ≥20% or high genomic risk [HGR]), T3N0 (stage IIB), and T4N0 (stage IIIB); T1N0 was excluded. Results: Of 2549 pts R to RIB + NSAI and 2552 to NSAI alone, 285 (11%) and 328 (13%) had N0 disease, respectively. BL characteristics for the N0 subgroup were balanced across arms. Most pts were premenopausal (RIB + NSAI: 67% vs NSAI alone: 63%). Pts with N0 disease had anatomic stage IIA (RIB + NSAI: 74% vs NSAI alone: 73%), stage IIB (17% vs 13%), or stage IIIB (9% vs 12%) disease (Table). Most pts received prior chemotherapy (RIB + NSAI: 72% vs NSAI alone: 71%); prior ET was received by 59% vs 62% of pts with RIB + NSAI vs NSAI alone. For pts with T2N0 disease treated with RIB + NSAI vs NSAI alone, 49% vs 45% had G3 disease and 49% vs 53% had G2 disease (54% vs 56% with T2N0, G2 & Ki-67 > 20%; 13% vs 23% with T2N0, G2, Ki-67 ≤20%/missing & HGR). Consistent with the ITT population, RIB + NSAI improved iDFS (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.41-1.27; 3y rate with RIB + NSAI vs NSAI alone, 93.2% vs 90.6%), distant disease–free survival (DDFS; HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.38-1.29; 3y rate, 94.3% vs 91.5%), and distant recurrence–free survival (DRFS; HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.29-1.17; 3y rate, 96.3% vs 92.5%) in pts with high-risk N0 disease. The safety profile of RIB in the N0 subgroup was consistent with the ITT population. The rate of discontinuation due to all grade adverse events was 24% vs 8% with RIB + NSAI vs NSAI alone. Conclusions: This analysis showed a consistent efficacy benefit and manageable safety profile of RIB + NSAI vs NSAI alone in pts with N0 disease in NATALEE. The 3y iDFS, DDFS, and DRFS rates in the control arm at this early follow-up underscore the risk of recurrence for the N0 subgroup. These findings support the use of RIB in pts with HR+/HER2− EBC at increased risk of recurrence, including pts with N0 disease. Clinical trial information: NCT03701334 . [Table: see text]

Adverse events of patients treated with antibody-drug conjugates in phase 1 clinical trials at the Royal Marsden Drug Development Unit from 2014 to 2024.

e15020 Background: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are designed to improve therapeutic indices of cytotoxic agents. Nevertheless, they may induce unexpected toxicities not observed with parent payloads. This study aimed to characterize the adverse events (AEs) seen in patients treated with ADCs in Phase 1 trials at The Royal Marsden Drug Development Unit (DDU). Methods: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive patients who received at least one dose of an ADC in a phase I trial from January 2014 to January 2024 at The Royal Marsden DDU. Descriptive statistics of patient characteristics, ADCs, and treatment-related AEs were performed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression will be utilized to assess correlations among patient and ADC characteristics and adverse events. P values of < 0.05 will be considered significant. Results: A total of 131 patients who participated in twelve ADC trials were included. The median age of participants was 63 years (range: 31-84) and 61% were females. Patients received a median of three prior lines of systemic treatment. The most common type of ADC target, antibody, linker and payload were receptor tyrosine kinase (51%), humanized IgG monoclonal antibody (69%), valine-citrulline (VC) cleavable linker (85%), and a tubulin-binding payload (59%), respectively. Most patients received an ADC dose of 1-3 mg/kg (76%) with each cycle given once every 3 weeks (64%). The median number of cycles was 3 with an average treatment duration of 63 days. Within the cohort, 89% of patients developed any grade AE and 17% experienced grade 3 or higher AEs. The major treatment-related AEs were fatigue (48%), nausea/vomiting (27%), ocular toxicity (26%), neuropathy (26%), skin rash (20%) and pneumonitis (8%). The median time to first onset of treatment-related adverse events were 37 days for ocular toxicity, 46 days for pneumonitis, and 54 days for neuropathy. ADC-related AEs led to treatment interruptions (51%), dose reductions (13%), and treatment discontinuations (28%). Two treatment-related grade 5 events occurred. The objective response rate was 18%, with 1 complete response and 22 partial responses. Conclusions: Despite being designed to minimize side effects, ADCs were associated with significant toxicities, including unexpected adverse events unrelated to target, antibodies or the payloads, limiting their therapeutic indices. Further analysis of the relationship between different components of the wide range of ADCs and AEs are warranted to better understand the potential mechanisms of ADC toxicity.

Talquetamab (Tal) therapy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM): Assessing weight loss and dysgeusia.

e19514 Background: Tal, a bispecific antibody targeting CD3 and GPRC5D receptors, has shown high response rates in heavily pretreated R/R MM patients. This study aimed to evaluate adverse events (AEs), specifically dysgeusia and weight loss in MM patients treated with tal. Methods: Patients treated at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences who received at least one dose of tal were included. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) was used to grade AEs. The body mass index (BMI)-adjusted weight loss grading system (WLGS) was used to capture weight loss trends over duration of treatment. Weight loss based on BMI was graded based on the BMI-WLGS. Results: 17 patients were included in our analysis. Nine patients (53%) were male. Ten patients (59%) were African American. Median age at diagnosis was 62 (range: 51-75years). Six patients (35%) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥2. The median number of prior lines of therapy was seven (range: 3-12). Fourteen patients (82%) received at least one prior autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant. The median number of tal doses received was 14.8 (range: 2-29). Median time on treatment (ranging from 1.15 to 15.84) was 4.36 months (range: 1.2-15.8 months). Overall response rate (ORR) for was 76%. Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 12 patients (70.6%), with 5 patients (29.4%) in grade 2 or higher CRS. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) in four patients (23.6%), and 2 patients (11.8%) had grade 2 ICANS. Fourteen patients (82%) developed significant weight loss during treatment with tal. The median weight loss was 11.6 lbs., and median decrease in BMI was 1.85. Median percentage of weight loss was 6.1% from weight prior to tal ranging from 0% to 14.3%. Two patients had grade I, five patients had grade II, six patients had grade III, and one patient had grade IV weight loss per the BMI-WLGS grading system. Fourteen patients (82%) reported dysgeusia during tal treatment. Eight of these patients had grade I dysgeusia, and six patients had grade II dysgeusia. Two patients had persistent dysgeusia even after discontinuation of tal treatment at time of last follow up. Eight patients had weight gain after tal discontinuation (n = 8/14, 57%), with 5 returning to their baseline weight or higher. Six of these patients had dysgeusia during tal, and all six had resolution of dysgeusia after tal discontinuation. Conclusions: In this study, tal resulted in weight loss and dysgeusia in the majority of patients with most cases of dysgeusia resolving after tal discontinuation. Patients, on average, lost 6% of their initial weight during tal treatment. More than two-thirds of patients treated with tal developed BMI-adjusted WLGS grade ≥II. Weight loss persisted in approximately half of the patients after discontinuation of tal. Such AEs need to be discussed with patients and monitored during treatment.