Adverse Event Profile Research Articles

Radicular Pain Management Using Ultrasound-Guided Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Epidural Steroid Injections: A Systematic Scoping Review of Comparative Studies.

Back pain is the leading cause of disability globally and results in a substantial medical and economic burden. Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) have been widely used as a treatment for back pain with radiculopathy of various etiologies. Ultrasound guidance (UG) for delivering ESIs can reduce costs and facilitate the procedure in resource-limited settings compared to the current standard technique of using fluoroscopic guidance (FG). This scoping review aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between UG and FG ESIs in the treatment of radicular pain. Systematic searches of Embase, Ovid Medline, Scopus, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), CDSR (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), and ClinicalTrials.gov were conducted in accordance with PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews) guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies investigating the outcomes between UG and FG ESIs in the treatment of radicular pain were included. The risk of bias for included RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool. From 1,659 potentially relevant publications, eight studies (five RCTs and three retrospective comparative studies) were included. Five of the studies were conducted in the Republic of Korea, one in China, one in India, and one in Egypt. All studies reported no significant difference between UG and FG ESIs in success rate, pain index, and postoperative disability (p > 0.05). One study reported increased intravascular injections in the FG group, but this did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). One study reported decreased needle-placement time in the UG group (p < 0.001). One study reported decreased total operation time in the UG group (p < 0.05). Overall, treatment outcomes and adverse events profile are comparable between UG and FG ESIs for radicular pain. UG ESIs reduce costs, minimize radiation exposure, facilitate vessel identification, prevent injury, and potentially save intraoperative time while offering the same benefits as FG injections. Future studies should focus on long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and the impact of UG ESIs on patient satisfaction and quality of life.

The TGFβ type I receptor kinase inhibitor vactosertib in combination with pomalidomide in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a phase 1b trial

Functional blockade of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGFβ) signalling pathway improves the efficacy of cytotoxic and immunotherapies. Here, we conducted a phase 1b study (ClinicalTrials.gov., NCT03143985) to determine the primary endpoints of safety, tolerability, and maximal tolerated dose (200 mg twice daily) for the orally-available TGFβ type I receptor kinase inhibitor vactosertib in combination with pomalidomide in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients who had received ≥2 lines of chemoimmunotherapy. Secondary endpoints demonstrated sustained clinical responses, favorable pharmacokinetic parameters and a 6-month progression-free survival of 82%. Vactosertib combined with pomalidomide was well-tolerated at all dose levels and displayed a manageable adverse event profile. Exploratory analysis indicated that vactosertib co-treatment with pomalidomide also reduced TGFβ levels in patient bone marrow as well as the level of CD8+ T-cells that expressed the immunoinhibitory marker PD-1. In vitro experiments indicated that vactosertib+pomalidomide co-treatment decreased the viability of MM cell lines and patient tumor cells, and increased CD8+ T-cell cytotoxic activity. Vactosertib is a safe therapeutic that demonstrates tumor-intrinsic activity and can overcome immunosuppressive challenges within the tumor microenvironment to reinvigorate T-cell fitness. Vactosertib offers promise to improve immunotherapeutic responses in heavily-pretreated MM patients refractory to conventional agents.

Efficacy and safety of deferoxamine in moderately ill COVID-19 patients: An open label, randomized controlled trial.

Deferoxamine is a potent iron chelator that could remove iron from the virus, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 requires iron to replication. Also, deferoxamine has antioxidant and cytokine-modulating effects. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of deferoxamine in patients with moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this randomized controlled trial, patients with moderate COVID-19 were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the deferoxamine group (received a solution of 500 mg deferoxamine divided into 4 doses a day through a nebulizer for 7 days) and the control group. The main outcomes were viral clearance, oxygen saturation (SPO2), body temperature, and respiratory rate (RR). Intensive care unit admission, hospital length of stay, and hospital mortality were also assessed. A total of 62 patients, with 30 in the deferoxamine group and 32 in the control group, were randomly assigned. There was no statistically significant improvement in viral clearance after the intervention ended in the deferoxamine group (36.7%) compared to the control group (34.4%). The results showed there was no significant difference between the analyzed groups in terms of SPO2, body temperature, RR, and the number of patients with a worse prognosis (SPO2 < 96%, temperature ≥ 37.5 °C, or RR ≥ 16/min) at the end of the study. There were no significant differences seen between the groups in terms of intensive care unit admission, hospital length of stay, hospital mortality, and the occurrence of adverse medication events during the follow-up period. Deferoxamine had no significant impact on improving moderately ill patients with COVID-19. However, it was well-tolerated in the patients, and this intervention demonstrated a safe profile of adverse events.

Safety of proteasome inhibitor drugs for the treatment of multiple myeloma post-marketing: a pharmacovigilance investigation based on the FDA adverse event reporting system

ABSTRACT Background The use of proteasome inhibitors (PIs), namely Bortezomib and Carfilzomib, revolutionized multiple myeloma (MM) treatment. Understanding their distinct adverse event (AE) profiles aids in tailored treatment plans. Research design and methods We analyzed FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data (Q1 2012-Q4 2023) for Bortezomib and Carfilzomib, utilizing reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN). Results FAERS yielded 19,720 Bortezomib and 12,252 Carfilzomib AE reports. Males aged 45–65 exhibited higher AE susceptibility. Common AE systems included Infections, Nervous System Disorders, Blood Disorders, General Disorders, Cardiac Disorders, and Renal Disorders. New Bortezomib signals were sepsis and colitis. Carfilzomib exhibited elevated cardiac and renal toxicity but reduced peripheral neuropathy and thrombocytopenia. Conclusions FAERS analysis revealed new AE signals (sepsis, colitis) for Bortezomib and highlighted Carfilzomib’s heightened cardiac and renal risks compared to Bortezomib. Balancing PIs’ benefits and risks is crucial for clinical decision-making.

Urinary and gynecologic adverse events associated with SSRI use

Background Selective Serotonin Receptor Inhibitors (SSRIs) are the most prescribed psychiatric drug in the United States. However, the adverse effects of SSRIs related to the genitourinary and reproductive systems in real-world settings remains unclear. The aim of this study is to identify a comprehensive profile of adverse events (AEs) associated with SSRIs in females using data from the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) and variability of adverse events across individual SSRIs. Methods A software designed to analyze adverse drug events, OpenVigil 2.1, was used to query the FAERS data. We defined 445 genitourinary and reproductive system related adverse events related to genitourinary and reproductive systems. Proportional reporting ratio (PRR) was utilized to assess the strength of association between adverse events and SSRIs. Subgroup analysis was conducted to stratify adverse events by age. Results The majority of AEs were related to sexual dysfunction, such as issues of arousal, libido, and orgasm. Additional significant findings were related to gynecologic bleeding, urinary retention and incontinence, and hypersexuality. Citalopram exhibited the strongest signal strengths, as evidenced by the highest proportional reporting ratios (PRRs), particularly in relation to sexual dysfunction. The strongest signals related to sexual dysfunction were found in the 40-59 years age group. Urinary symptoms were most prevalent in the over 60 years age group. Conclusion According to our findings, the potential for genitourinary and reproductive system related AEs of SSRIs warrants further investigation of underlying mechanisms and monitoring in clinical practice. AEs are important considerations for clinical practice as side effects of SSRIs can impact treatment compliance and patient quality of life.

COVID-19 Modified mRNA “Vaccines”: Lessons Learned from Clinical Trials, Mass Vaccination, and the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex, Part 2

The COVID-19 modified mRNA (modmRNA) lipid nanoparticle-based “vaccines” are not classical antigen-based vaccines but instead prodrugs informed by gene therapy technology. Of considerable note, these products have been linked to atypical adverse and serious adverse event profiles. As discussed in Part 1, health-related risks and drawbacks were drastically misreported and underreported in the Pfizer and Moderna trial evaluations of these genetic products. Now in Part 2, we examine the main structural and functional aspects of these injectables. The COVID-19 modmRNA injectable products introduce a unique set of biological challenges to the human body with the potential to induce an extensive range of adverse, crippling, and life-threatening effects. Based on the fact that there is no current method to quantify host (cell-based) spike protein production in vivo following injection with these prodrugs, there is no standard “dose”. This is in part due to differences in spike protein production output, which depends on cell metabolism and transfection efficiency. It is therefore difficult to predict adverse event profiles on an individual basis, but considering that millions of adults across the world have reported severe and serious adverse events in the context of these modmRNA COVID-19 products, valid concerns are raised regarding injection of infants and younger age groups for whom COVID-19 poses only minimal risks. We address the process-related genetic impurities inherent in mass production of these products, and the potential risks posed by these contaminants. We then categorize the principal adverse events associated with the modmRNA products with a brief systems-based synopsis of each of the six domains of potential harms: (1) cardiovascular, (2) neurological, (3) hematologic; (4) immunological, (5) oncological, and (6) reproductive. We conclude with a discussion of the primary public health and regulatory issues arising from this evidence-informed synthesis of the literature and reiterate the urgency of imposing a global moratorium on the modmRNA-LNP-based platform.

The discovery and development of gefapixant as a novel antitussive therapy

ABSTRACT Introduction Gefapixant, a P2X 3 receptor antagonist, shows considerable potential in managing refractory or unexplained chronic cough. Clinical trials have consistently demonstrated its efficacy in significantly reducing cough frequency and alleviating associated symptoms. However, its adverse effect profile, particularly taste disturbances such as dysgeusia and hypogeusia, the incidence of which is dose-dependent, poses a significant challenge to patient compliance and overall treatment satisfaction. Areas covered The authors review the mechanism of action of gefapixant, the dose-dependent nature of its adverse effects and the findings from various clinical trials, including Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 studies. The authors also cover its regulatory status, post-marketing data, and its main competitors. Expert opinion Gefapixant represents a significant advancement in treating chronic cough. However, balancing efficacy and tolerability is crucial. Lower effective doses and potential combination therapies may mitigate taste disturbances. Patient education and close monitoring during treatment are also important for optimal outcomes. Further research is needed to refine dosing strategies to minimize side effects while maintaining therapeutic efficacy. This research and personalized treatment approaches are key to optimizing gefapixant therapy, ensuring improved management of chronic cough while reducing adverse effects. However, pharmaceutical trials and proposals must be adapted to align with each regulatory body’s specific requirements and concerns.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery Outcomes in Arteriovenous Malformations: A Pediatric-Adult Comparative Meta-Analysis

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an established treatment for brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), but outcomes between pediatric and adult populations are not well compared. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing SRS outcomes for pediatric versus adult AVMs. PubMed was searched for studies reporting SRS outcomes for pediatric or adult AVMs up to January 2024. Primary outcome was obliteration rate, with secondary outcomes including post-SRS hemorrhage, symptomatic radiation-induced changes (RICs), and permanent RICs. Pooled estimates were calculated using random effects models. Analysis included 22 studies with 3469 patients (1316 pediatric, 2153 adult). Pooled obliteration rate was 63% (95% confidence interval: 56%-70%) overall, with no significant difference between pediatric (61%) and adult (67%) cohorts (P= 0.38). Post-SRS hemorrhage rates were similar (5% pediatric, 6% adult, P= 0.60). Symptomatic RICs occurred in 9% (95% confidence interval: 6%-13%) overall, with 10% in both cohorts (P= 0.91). Permanent RIC rates were 4% in pediatric and 3% in adult cohorts (P= 0.43). Cyst formation (0.6%) and radiation-induced tumors (0.2%) were rare. All-cause mortality was significantly lower in the pediatric cohort (2.6% vs. 9.8%, P= 0.003). Hemorrhagic AVM presentation was inversely correlated with symptomatic RICs across both groups. SRS is a reasonable treatment option for appropriately selected AVM patients in both pediatric and adult populations, offering comparable obliteration rates and adverse event profiles. The lower mortality in pediatric patients underscores the importance of early intervention in this population given their high cumulative lifetime rupture risks.

Prolonged magnesium sulfate infusion as adjuvant analgesia in postoperative transplant patients in the pediatric ICU: Preliminary results of a feasibility study

AbstractThe opioid crisis has emphasized identification of opioid‐sparing analgesics. This study was designed as a prospective trial with retrospective control group to determine feasibility for implementing a high‐dose prolonged magnesium sulfate infusion for adjuvant analgesia in the pediatric intensive care unit. Approval was granted for study of children receiving total pancreatectomy with islet cell autotransplantation and liver transplantation ages 3–18 years. Study exclusions were pregnancy, neuromuscular disease, hypersensitivity, preoperative creatinine &gt;1.5 times upper limit normal, arrhythmia or pacemaker presence, and clinician concern. Eleven patients were enrolled between January 2020 and December 2022. Magnesium sulfate bolus (50 mg/kg) followed by intravenous infusion (15 mg/kg/h) was initiated in the operating room and extended postoperatively (maximum 48 h). Serum magnesium levels were monitored serially. To prioritize safety, infusion dose was decreased by 5 mg/kg/h for levels greater than 3.5 mg/dL. Clinical team otherwise followed standard multimodal pain practice. Primary outcome was oral morphine equivalent per kg per day during intensive care course (maximum 7 days). Secondary outcomes focused primarily on magnesium safety, including hemodynamic variables, electrolyte variables, respiratory support, and opioid‐related side effects. There were no serious adverse events. Treatment group trended toward slightly higher intravenous fluid requirement (~1 bolus), however no increase in blood product. Treatment and control groups were otherwise comparable in targeted outcomes and overall adverse event profile. Use of a high‐dose magnesium sulfate infusion protocol for analgesic postoperative use in select transplant recipients appears feasible for continued optimization of study in the PICU.

Outcomes of Different Surgical Interventions for Treating Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Review.

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a debilitating condition characterized by severe facial pain. Various surgical interventions are employed to manage this condition, including microvascular decompression (MVD), percutaneous radiofrequency rhizotomy (PRR), glycerol rhizotomy, percutaneous balloon compression (PBC), and stereotactic radiosurgery such as Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). This review synthesizes the outcomes of these interventions to provide an understanding of their efficacy and associated risks. MVD, known for its high initial relief rates, shows substantial long-term effectiveness, with recurrence rates varying based on patient demographics and comorbidities. GKRS offers significant pain relief with a favorable adverse event profile; however, recurrence rates increase over time, necessitating repeat procedures for sustained efficacy. PBC demonstrates high initial success, but pain recurrence is common, especially in patients with atypical TN. PRR provides immediate relief with a manageable recurrence rate and is particularly suitable for elderly patients and those with comorbidities. Glycerol rhizotomy, a cost-effective procedure, yields comparable outcomes to other interventions but requires careful patient selection. This review highlights the importance of tailored treatment approaches based on individual patient profiles, emphasizing the need for precise diagnostic criteria and careful patient selection to optimize outcomes. Long-term follow-up and the potential for repeat interventions are critical considerations in managing TN surgically.

Delayed addition of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors into chemotherapy on the outcomes for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A propensity score-matched study.

208 Background: Immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy has become the first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, some patients failed to undergo simultaneous immunotherapy at the time of initial chemotherapy, and whether this will have an impact on the efficacy of immunochemotherapy has not been fully explored. Methods: Between January 2020 and December 2022, the study included 416 patients diagnosed with ES-SCLC and receiving first-line immunotherapy, divided into two groups: delayed-IO (administering PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors at 2-4 Cycles of chemotherapy) and early-IO (administering PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors concurrent with first-cycle chemotherapy). Propensity score matching (PSM, 1:1) was performed to balance the baseline characteristics of the two groups. The primary endpoints were OS and PFS. Calculations were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and comparisons were made using the log-rank test. Results: Mainly due to the fact that PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors were not included in the medical insurance, which was difficult for patients to afford and the poor physical condition of some patients, taking into account the safety of the patients themselves, 72 patients in the delayed-IO group (2 cycles of chemotherapy: 41; 3 cycles: 16; 4 cycles: 15), and 344patients were included in the early-IO group. The median OS and PFS were 24.00 months and 8.75 months in the delayed-IO group, and those were 18.59 months and 7.57 months in the early-IO group, respectively, before PSM. There was no significant difference in OS and PFS between the two groups (HR 0.72; P = 0.054 and HR 0.86; P = 0.281, respectively). After PSM, there were 72 patients in each of the two groups. The median OS in the delayed-IO group and the early-IO group was 24.00 months and 18.79 months, respectively (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.38-0.97; P = 0.037). Median PFS was 8.75 and 6.49 months in the two groups, respectively (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.48-0.99; P = 0.044). There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups. The overall adverse event profile was comparable between the two groups. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that administering PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors at 2-4 Cycles of chemotherapy was superior to administering PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors concurrent with first-cycle chemotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC, while the safety profile of both was similar.

Comparative analysis of adverse events associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors based on FDA’s adverse event reporting system: a case control pharmacovigilance study

BackgroundCyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors marked a milestone in the breast cancer treatment. Due to the potential impact of adverse effects on treatment decisions and patient outcomes, careful consideration of the varying toxicities of CDK4/6 inhibitors is crucial, as three inhibitors—palbociclib, abemaciclib, and ribociclib—have been approved with differences in adverse event profiles. However, limitations in clinical trials call for urgent real-world safety studies to evaluate and compare the risk of adverse events (AEs) among these CDK4/6 inhibitors. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze AEs of CDK4/6 inhibitors and provide insights for clinical drug selection, using real world database.MethodsThe AEs of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (2015–2022) were analyzed. Four disproportionality methods were used to detect safety signals: reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian Confidence Neural Network Propagation, and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker. Venn analysis was used to compare and select common and specific AEs.ResultsThis study included 73,042 patients treated with palbociclib, 25,142 with ribociclib, and 7563 with abemaciclib. All three inhibitors had 27 common AEs. Palbociclib exhibited the highest ROR for hematologic toxicities, while ribociclib showed the highest ROR for macrocytosis, nail disorders, and hepatic lesions. Abemaciclib displayed the highest ROR for mucosal toxicity. Common signals for both palbociclib and ribociclib included hematologic toxicities, decreased immune responsiveness, and aphthous ulcers. Myelosuppression, oral pain, and pseudocirrhosis were common signals for palbociclib and abemaciclib. Anemia, hepatotoxicity, and pneumonitis were observed as common signals for ribociclib and abemaciclib. Furthermore, specific AEs associated with palbociclib included fatigue, alopecia, and stomatitis. For ribociclib, specific AEs included electrocardiogram QT prolongation, thrombocytopenia, and decreased hemoglobin. Abemaciclib was specifically linked to diarrhea, vomiting, and interstitial lung disease.ConclusionOur analysis revealed that palbociclib showed a higher risk of hematologic toxicity. Ribociclib showed higher risks of hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and QT prolongation. Abemaciclib showed higher risks of hepatotoxicity, gastrointestinal effects, interstitial lung disease, and thrombosis. These findings provide valuable insights for CDK4/6 inhibitor selection.

Comparative analysis of novel hormonal agents in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A Taiwanese perspective.

Non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is an asymptomatic condition with the potential to progress to metastasis. Novel hormonal agents (NHAs) are currently considered the gold standard treatment for nmCRPC, offering significant survival benefits. However, further evidence is needed to determine whether there are differences in the performance of these drugs among Asian populations. This retrospective analysis of nmCRPC patients aims to compare the efficacy and safety of three NHAs-apalutamide, darolutamide, and enzalutamide. Data were collected from two prominent prostate care centers in Taichung, Taiwan. Patient characteristics, treatment details, PSA responses, and adverse events were analyzed. Statistical comparisons were performed, and the study received Institutional Review Board approval. Total of 64 patients were recruited in this study, including 29 darolutamide, 26 apalutamide, and 9 enzalutamide patients. Baseline characteristics varied between the three patient groups, but the treatment response still revealed similar results. The apalutamide group experienced more adverse events, notably skin rash. Discontinuation rates due to adverse events differed among the groups, and patients receiving darolutamide were less likely to discontinue treatment. This real-world study provides insights into NHA utilization in nmCRPC within the Taiwanese population. Adverse event profiles varied, emphasizing the need for individualized treatment decisions. The study underscores the importance of regional considerations and contributes valuable data for optimizing treatment outcomes in nmCRPC.

Adverse Event Profiles of Adalimumab in Children: A Disproportionality Analysis.

Adalimumab has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of adult rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and subsequently approved for pediatric treatment of various autoimmune diseases in children of different ages. Due to genetic differences between children and adults in terms of physiology and immunity, there is a need to explore the safety of adalimumab in children in the real world. The aim of this study is to identify potential adverse event (AE) signals associated with the use of adalimumab in pediatric patients (<18 years old) using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). AEs associated with adalimumab in pediatric patients reported in the FAERS database from the first quarter (Q1) of 2017 to the third quarter (Q3) of 2022 were systematically gathered. Reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the information component (IC), and the empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM) were used to assess the relationship between adalimumab and AEs in children. Out of 8,363,304 reports collected from the FAERS database during the study period, 3819 reports on children on adalimumab were identified. Adalimumab-related AEs reports were concentrated on 10 toxicity areas and a total of 202 positive signals were detected, of which injection site papule (ROR = 261.97) and intestinal fistula (ROR = 122.09) had the strongest signals. Unexpected significant AEs, including intestinal obstruction, immunodeficiency, abdominal abscess, and Takayasu's arteritis might also occur. In comparison with patients of all ages in the same time window, the median onset time of children was shorter (99 vs. 149 days). Most of the AE cases occurred in children within the first 1 (1.71%), 2 (8.12%), and 3 months (8.39%) and had early failure types after adalimumab initiation. Methotrexate, folic acid, prednisone, azathioprine, and mesalamine were the top five drugs used concomitantly for adalimumab-associated AEs. When adalimumab is used in children, especially in the first 3 months of treatment, in addition to the AEs recorded in the drug package insert, close attention should be paid to the new potential AEs off-label to ensure the safety of adalimumab in children.

Outcome of intravenous and inhaled polymyxin B treatment in patients with multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial pneumonia

PurposeThe incidence of pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDR GNB) is increasing, which imposes significant burden on public health. Inhalation combined with intravenous polymyxins has emerged as a viable treatment option. However, pharmacokinetic studies focusing on intravenous and inhaled polymyxin B (PMB) are limited. MethodsThis study included seven patients with MDR GNB-induced pneumonia who were treated with intravenous plus inhaled PMB from March 1 to November 30, 2022, in the intensive care unit of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Clinical outcomes and therapeutic drug monitoring data of PMB in both plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) were retrospectively reviewed. ResultsMedian PMB concentrations in the ELF were 7.83 (0.72–66.5), 116.72 (17.37–571.26), 41.1 (3.69–133.78) and 33.82 (0.83–126.68) mg/L at 0, 2, 6 and 12 h, respectively, and were much higher than those detected in the serum. ELF concentrations of PMB at 0, 2, 6 and 12 h were higher than the minimum inhibitory concentrations of pathogens isolated from the patients. Steady-state concentrations of PMB in the plasma were >2 mg/L in most patients. Of the patients, 57.14% were cured and 71.43% showed a favourable microbiological response. The incidence of side effects with PMB was low. ConclusionsInhaled plus intravenous PMB can achieve high ELF concentrations and favourable clinical outcomes without an increased adverse effect profile. This treatment approach appears promising for the treatment of patients with pneumonia caused by MDR-GNB.

Adverse Event Profiles of the Third-Generation Aromatase Inhibitors: Analysis of Spontaneous Reports Submitted to FAERS.

The third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs), represented by letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane, have been used as a standard first-line adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal breast cancer patients with positive hormone receptor. However, their safety in the real world has not been systematically analyzed. We used the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to investigate adverse event (AE) profiles of the three AIs, covering the period from Q1 2004 to Q3 2023. The time-to-event onset profiles and cumulative incidence were analyzed by Weibull shape parameter test and Kaplan-Meier method, respectively. The disproportionality analysis was utilized to assess drug toxicity risk. Based on the FAERS database, 18,035, 8242, and 7011 reports listing letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane as primary suspected drugs were extracted, respectively. AEs associated with anastrozole displayed the latest onset (p < 0.0001); meanwhile, WSP test showed that all three AIs had early failure-type profiles. At the preferred term level, we acquired 95, 59, and 42 significant signals associated with letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane, which involved 18, 13, and 15 system organ classes, respectively. The three AIs all reported that their strongest AE signal was trigger finger. Neutropenia was the most frequent AE for letrozole, while the highest occurrences of anastrozole and exemestane were arthralgia. We also found that interstitial lung disease, a rare but serious AE, showed strong signal intensity in all three AIs. Additionally, letrozole was also associated with lots of other rare but serious AEs in hematologic, respiratory, and hepatic systems, which were not recorded in the instructions. Our analysis of safety warning signals of the third-generation AIs from the FAERS database provided reference for clinical safe and rational drug use.

Efficacy and Safety of Perioperative Angiotensin II Versus Phenylephrine as a First-Line Continuous Infusion Vasopressor in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Angiotensin II (ATII) maintains blood pressure via RAAS with a beneficial adverse effect profile versus catecholamines and phenylephrine. Head-to-head data comparing ATII to phenylephrine are lacking regarding renal allograft function, hemodynamic efficacy, and safety within the perioperative period of kidney transplantation. This single-center, retrospective study included adult kidney transplant recipients who received continuous infusions of ATII or phenylephrine within a 24-h perioperative period as a first-line vasopressor according to an institutional algorithm. The primary endpoint was allograft function. Secondary endpoints were hemodynamic efficacy and adverse effects. Among 105 patients, there was no significant difference in IGF (p = 0.545), SGF (p = 0.557), or DGF (p = 0.878) between patient cohorts. In the 34 patients with cold ischemia time (CIT) > 14-h, IGF was higher (p = 0.013) and DGF (p = 0.045) was lower in the ATII cohort versus phenylephrine. In all patients, ATII was associated with a decreased need for additional vasopressor agents (p < 0.001). Adverse effect profiles were similar between cohorts (p > 0.05). Among kidney transplant recipients, ATII may be a suitable first-line alternative compared with phenylephrine in the perioperative period for hypotension management with a reduced need for additional vasopressor support. Allograft benefits were observed in patients with prolonged CIT.

Safety assessment of neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist: real-world adverse event analysis from the FAERS database.

Aprepitant, fosaprepitant, and netupitant are three common neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists (NK-1RAs) used to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, following highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Understanding their different adverse event (AE) profiles may help clinicians make appropriate treatment decisions. All data collected from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2023 underwent disproportionality analysis to detect, evaluate, and compare AE signals of the three NK-1RAs. A total of 3,904, 1,123, and 243 AE reports related to aprepitant, fosaprepitant, and netupitant, respectively, were extracted from the FAERS database. Of these, more than 50% of respondents were female, and most of them were aged 45-65years. General disorders and administration-site conditions, and gastrointestinal disorders were the most frequent signals in the system organ class of the three NK-1RA drugs. In addition, aprepitant was strongly associated with joint deposit (ROR = 26.27) and fosaprepitant was closely related to seizure-like phenomena (ROR = 26.90); two preferred terms (PTs) were not mentioned in the manual. Statistically, netupitant was likely to induce death (N = 63, ROR = 8.78, 95% CI: 6.75-11.42). Additionally, neutropenic colitis, colitis, and stomatitis were unique to netupitant. Furthermore, the AE profiles of the three NK-1RA drugs were different by gender. The AE profiles for aprepitant, fosaprepitant, and netupitant were different. In addition to paying attention to common AEs, clinicians need to pay attention to new emerging AEs, such as joint deposit, seizure-like phenomena, neutropenic colitis, colitis, and stomatitis, regarding the three NK-1RA drugs. Furthermore, the AE compositions of the three NK-1RA drugs were different in different genders, and clinicians should take these factors into account when selecting NK-1RAs for CINV treatment.

Real-world study of adverse events associated with gepant use in migraine treatment based on the VigiAccess and U.S. Food and Drug Administration's adverse event reporting system databases.

This study aimed to investigate the real-world profile of adverse events (AEs) associated with gepant medications in the clinical treatment of migraines by analyzing data collected from the VigiAccess database and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. As novel migraine therapies, gepants act by targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway, demonstrating effective control of migraine attacks and good tolerability. Nonetheless, comprehensive real-world studies on the safety of gepants are still lacking, particularly regarding their safety in large populations, long-term use, and potential adverse reactions in specific groups, which necessitates further empirical research. Leveraging these two international adverse event reporting system databases, we systematically gathered and analyzed reports of AEs related to gepant medications, such as rimegepant. Our focus encompasses but is not limited to severe, new, and rare adverse reactions induced by the drugs, as well as safety issues pertaining to the gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, hepatic, and renal systems. Through descriptive statistical analyses, we assessed the incidence and characteristics of AEs, compared AEs among gepants, and uncovered previously unknown AE information, all with the goal of providing a reference for the selection of clinical treatment regimens and AE monitoring. By extracting all AE reports concerning "rimegepant", "atogepant", and "ubrogepant" from the VigiAccess and FAERS database since its establishment up to 31 March 2024, a retrospective quantitative analysis was conducted. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) method were used to compare AEs among the three gepants. In the VigiAccess and FAERS databases, 23542 AE reports in total, respectively, were identified as being related to gepant medications. Among gastrointestinal system AEs, rimegepant had the greatest proportion and greatest signal strength; nausea was most severe and had the strongest signal in rimegepant AEs, whereas constipation was most prominent and had the strongest signal in atogepant AEs. In skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, rash and pruritus were more frequently observed with rimegepant, followed by ubrogepant. Alopecia emerged as a novel AE, being more severe in rimegepant and secondarily in atogepant. Regarding cardiac disorders, the three gepants showed comparable rates of cardiac AEs, yet rimegepant exhibited the strongest AE signal. In musculoskeletal and connective tissue AEs, ubrogepant presented the most positive signals for skeletal muscle AEs. Furthermore, among the rare blood and lymphatic system disorder AEs, rimegepant had the highest number of reports of Raynaud's phenomenon and the strongest signal. The study also revealed that while reports of AEs involving liver diseases were scarce across the three gepants, severe AEs were detected in clinical trials, highlighting the need for continued, enhanced monitoring of liver system AEs through large-scale datasets. Gepant medications exhibit similarities and differences in their safety profiles. Analysis of the two databases indicated the presence of AEs across various systems, including gastrointestinal disorders, skin and subcutaneous tissue diseases, musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, organ-specific effects, and liver diseases. However, each drug displays distinct incidences and signal intensities for these AEs. Additionally, the study revealed a rare AE in the form of Raynaud's phenomenon. These findings suggest that during clinical use, individualized medication selection and AE monitoring should be based on the patient's physiological condition and specific characteristics.

Comparative analysis of antibiotics: Inhibition of protein synthesis versus DNA synthesis

In this piece of writing, we will be addressing the following factors: properties of antibiotics, mechanism of action, clinical safety profile, as well as toxicity, adverse event profile, and case fatality rate. From our evaluation, in terms of properties of the two groups of antibiotics, protein synthesis-inhibiting antibiotics displays a like number of lipophilic and hydrophilic properties, with the majority of Anti-30S inhibitor drugs being predominantly hydrophilic, and a higher number of lipophilic drugs amongst Anti-50S inhibitors. Anti-50S inhibitors could therefore be preferred in oral intake drug development. DNA synthesis-inhibiting antibiotics show a limited trend in their properties. The mechanism of action for protein synthesis-inhibiting antibiotics generally follows four steps: activation of amino acids, initiation, extension, and termination of peptide chain synthesis. On the other hand, DNA synthesis-inhibiting antibiotics exhibits a range of different mechanisms, all of which results in the damage of DNA structure of the bacterium. In both clinical safety and toxicity studies, it is concluded that the two groups of antibiotics have previous cases of side effects, with the DNA synthesis-inhibiting drug, fluoroquinolones, more dangerous due to its potential to result in ventricular fibrillation on a patient. By assessing and comparing all the factors, this review aims to present a precise comparison of the similarities and differences between the protein and DNA synthesis inhibitors, and an evaluation of the effectiveness of the two groups against bacterial infections, along with their safety for regular medication use.