Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Research Articles

Avelumab first-line maintenance (1LM) for advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC): Long-term outcomes from JAVELIN Bladder 100 in patients (pts) with low tumor burden.

4566 Background: In the JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase 3 trial, avelumab 1LM + best supportive care (BSC) significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) vs BSC alone in pts with aUC that had not progressed with 1L platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC). Results led to the incorporation of avelumab 1LM into international guidelines. Prior analyses have shown that low tumor burden (eg, nonvisceral metastases or lymph node [LN]-only disease) is associated with better outcomes in pts with aUC receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. We report post hoc analyses of efficacy and safety in subsets of pts with low tumor burden from JAVELIN Bladder 100. Methods: Eligible pts with unresectable locally advanced (LA) or metastatic UC without progression after 1L PBC were randomized 1:1 to receive avelumab + BSC (n=350) or BSC alone (n=350). The primary endpoint was OS measured from randomization; secondary endpoints included PFS and safety. In this post hoc analysis, pts with nonvisceral metastases included those with LA disease or only nonvisceral disease, including bone metastasis, at randomization. Results: In the avelumab + BSC and BSC alone arms, 159 and 159 pts had nonvisceral metastases and 51 and 51 pts had LN-only disease, of whom 42 and 35 pts had LN-only disease in the pelvic/retroperitoneal area. At the efficacy data cutoff (June 4, 2021), median follow-up was ≥38 mo in both arms (≥2 y in all pts). In all subgroups, OS and PFS were prolonged with avelumab + BSC vs BSC alone (Table). Incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) with avelumab were similar across subgroups. In the avelumab + BSC and BSC alone arms, subsequent anticancer drug treatment was received by 90 (56.6%) vs 119 pts (74.8%) with nonvisceral metastases, 27 (52.9%) vs 39 pts (76.5%) with LN-only disease, and 22 (52.4%) vs 27 pts (77.1%) with pelvic/retroperitoneal LN-only disease. Conclusions: Exploratory analyses suggest that avelumab 1LM has pronounced efficacy and manageable toxicity in pts with aUC who have low tumor burden, supporting its use as a standard of care in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT02603432 . [Table: see text]

Real-world treatment patterns and quality of life among patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma living in Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Taiwan, and Turkey.

To evaluate demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in Asia. Data were drawn from the Adelphi Real World Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey of medical oncologists/urologists and their adult patients in Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Taiwan, and Turkey. Exploratory patient-reported outcomes included the EQ-5D visual analog scale, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life of Patient Questionnaire global health, and Brief Pain Inventory. Analyses were descriptive. Overall, 175 physicians reported data for 988 patients. Mean (standard deviation) patient age was 66.3 (10.8) years, 77% were men, and 82% had bladder tumors at diagnosis. Of patients receiving first- (n = 988), second- (n = 290), and third-line (n = 87) treatments, 81%, 35%, and 59% received chemotherapy, respectively, and 17%, 63%, and 34% received programmed cell death protein 1/ligand 1 inhibitors, respectively. Patient-reported (n = 319) mean (standard deviation) EQ-5D visual analog scale score was 51.8 (15.6), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life of Patient Questionnaire global health status score was 44.6 (19.9), and Brief Pain Inventory score was 6.5 (1.9; n = 315). The most common first- and second-line treatments for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma were chemotherapy and programmed cell death protein 1/ligand inhibitors, respectively. At third line, 10% of patients received best supportive care alone, underscoring an unmet need for effective third-line treatment options. Patients in all regions reported quality-of-life impairment.

Positive surgical margin after attempted radical surgery in patients with locally advanced urothelial carcinoma: literature review and case reports

Positive surgical margin is observed in approximately 10 % of specimens after radical surgery for locally advanced urothelial carcinoma, and is associated with an increased risk of locoregional recurrence, metastases, and death. R+ patients are a heterogeneous group of patients requiring individual treatment approaches. There is no standard of care for R+ patients; acceptable options include observation, removal of residual tumor, postoperative chemotherapy (CT), immunotherapy (IT), radiation therapy (RT), and chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The choice of treatment plan depends on the location and characteristics of the primary tumor, use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) before surgery and the response to it, the pathological response, the presence of detectable residual tumor, as well as the potential tolerability of immediate postoperative treatment.

Erdafitinib (Balversa) for urothelial carcinoma.

Erdafitinib (Balversa – Janssen), an oral kinase inhibitor, has received full approval from the FDA for treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in adults with susceptible FGFR3 (fibroblast growth factor receptor) genetic alterations who had disease progression on or after at least one prior line of systemic therapy.

IBI310 (anti-CTLA-4 antibody) monotherapy or in combination with sintilimab in advanced melanoma or urothelial carcinoma

IBI310 is a recombinant fully human IgG1 antibody against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4). This study was conducted to evaluate IBI310 monotherapy or combination therapy with sintilimab in the patients with advanced melanoma or urothelial carcinoma (UC). Patients in phase Ia received IBI310 at 0.3/1/2/3 mg/kg intravenously (IV) every three weeks (Q3W) following the accelerated titration and 3 + 3 escalation design. Patients in phase Ib received IBI310 (1/2/3 mg/kg IV, Q3W) plus sintilimab (200 mg IV, Q3W) for 4 cycles, followed by sintilimab maintenance therapy. The phase Ib expansion of IBI310 plus sintilimab was performed in patients with advanced melanoma or UC. Overall, 53 patients were enrolled including 10 patients with melanoma in phase Ia, 34 with melanoma and 9 with UC in phase Ib. 94.3% (50/53) patients experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) with most being grade 1-2; 26.4% (14/53) patients experienced grade ≥3 TRAEs. In phase Ia, disease control rate (DCR) was 50.0% (95% CI: 18.7%-81.3%). In phase Ib, objective response rate (ORR) and DCR were 17.6% (95% CI: 6.8%-34.5%) and 44.1% (95% CI: 27.2%-62.1%) respectively for melanoma, and were 22.2% (95% CI: 2.8%-60.0%) and 66.7% (95% CI: 29.9%-92.5%) respectively for UC. IBI310 monotherapy or combination therapy with sintilimab was well-tolerated with favorable antitumor activity across patients with advanced melanoma and UC.

Cost-effectiveness of avelumab first-line maintenance therapy for adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in France.

This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of avelumab first-line (1L) maintenance therapy plus best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone for adults with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) that had not progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy in France. A three-state partitioned survival model was developed to assess the lifetime costs and effects of avelumab plus BSC versus BSC alone. Data from the phase 3 JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial (NCT02603432) were used to inform estimates of clinical and utility values considering a 10-year time horizon and a weekly cycle length. Cost data were estimated from a collective perspective and included treatment acquisition, administration, follow-up, adverse event-related hospitalization, transport, post-progression, and end-of-life costs. Health outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and life-years gained. Costs and clinical outcomes were discounted at 2.5% per annum. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were used to compare cost-effectiveness and willingness to pay in France. Uncertainty was assessed using a range of sensitivity analyses. Avelumab plus BSC was associated with a gain of 2.49 QALYs and total discounted costs of €136,917; BSC alone was associated with 1.82 QALYs and €39,751. Although avelumab plus BSC was associated with increased acquisition costs compared with BSC alone, offsets of -€20,424 and -€351 were observed for post-progression and end-of-life costs, respectively. The base case analysis ICER was €145,626/QALY. Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the reference case and showed that efficacy parameters (overall survival, time to treatment discontinuation), post-progression time on immunotherapy, and post-progression costs had the largest impact on the ICER. This analysis demonstrated that avelumab plus BSC is associated with a favorable cost-effectiveness profile for patients with la/mUC who are eligible for 1L maintenance therapy in France.

A single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 clinical study of recombinant humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody-MMAE conjugate (MRG002) in HER2-positive unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma

BackgroundMRG002 is a novel HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate being investigated in the MRG002–006 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety in HER2-positive urothelial carcinoma patients. MethodsThis is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter phase II study. Eligibility criteria included: histologically confirmed HER2 IHC 2 + or 3 + UC, prior received ≥ 1 standard treatment. Patients in this study received MRG002 every 3 weeks until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was confirmed ORR per RECIST 1.1. ResultsAs of February 24, 2023, a total of 43 patients were enrolled. The median age was 60. 9 patients were dosed at 2.6 mg/kg and 34 patients were dosed at 2.2 mg/kg. At baseline, most patients (29/43) received ≥ 2 lines of treatment and 35 (81.4%) patients had prior ICI therapy. FISH test was performed in 41 patients and 9 (22.0%) were positive. By the cut-off date, 41 patients were evaluable and the ORR was 53% (95%CI：38.9%−67.5%), with 6.9% CR, and the DCR was 83.7% (95%CI：70.0%−91.9%). The median PFS and OS for the 43 patients were 7.0 months (95%CI：5.4-NE) and 14.9 months (95%CI：11.9-NE), respectively. The ORR was 77.8% in 9 patients with positive HER2 FISH results. Most common treatment-related AEs were anemia (51.2%), alopecia (44.2%) and neutropenia (39.5%); most were grade 1 or 2. ConclusionPreliminary results of MRG002 demonstrated a clinically meaningful response in pretreated HER-2 positive unresectable locally advanced or metastatic UC patients. MRG002 at 2.2 mg/kg was well tolerated with a manageable toxicity.

J-AVENUE: A retrospective, real-world study evaluating patient characteristics and outcomes in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with avelumab first-line maintenance therapy in Japan.

The JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase 3 trial showed that avelumab first-line maintenance + best supportive care significantly prolonged overall survival and progression-free survival versus best supportive care alone in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who were progression-free following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. We report findings from J-AVENUE (NCT05431777), a real-world study of avelumab first-line maintenance therapy in Japan. Medical charts of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma without disease progression following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, who received avelumab maintenance between February and November 2021, were reviewed. Patients were followed until June 2022. The primary endpoint was patient characteristics; secondary endpoints included time to treatment failure and progression-free survival. In 79 patients analyzed, median age was 72 years (range, 44-86). Primary tumor site was upper tract in 45.6% and bladder in 54.4%. The most common first-line chemotherapy regimen was cisplatin + gemcitabine (63.3%). Median number of chemotherapy cycles received was four. Best response to chemotherapy was complete response in 10.1%, partial response in 58.2%, and stable disease in 31.6%. Median treatment-free interval before avelumab was 4.9 weeks. With avelumab first-line maintenance therapy, the disease control rate was 58.2%, median time to treatment failure was 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.3-6.4), and median progression-free survival was 6.1 months (95% CI, 3.6-9.7). Findings from J-AVENUE show the effectiveness of avelumab first-line maintenance in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma in Japan in clinical practice, with similar progression-free survival to JAVELIN Bladder 100 and previous real-world studies, supporting its use as a standard of care.

Pre-first-line chemotherapy risk stratification for overall survival in advanced urothelial carcinoma in sequential therapy era.

To explore pre-treatment risk factors for overall survival (OS) in advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) patients treated with first-line (1L) chemotherapy in sequential therapy (ST) era. Additionally, to evaluate the proportion of patients who were not able to undergo subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy according to the subgroups stratified by the risk factors. A multicenter retrospective study was conducted. Metastatic or locally advanced UC patients treated between 2017 and 2022 were included. The Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test and multivariate Cox regression models were used to address OS. Three hundred and fourteen patients treated with 1L chemotherapy were included in the study and 57 (18.2%) patients were not able to proceed to subsequent ICI therapy. Pre-chemotherapy risk factors for OS in 314 patients were ECOG-PS 1 or more, having no primary site resection, C-reactive protein (CRP) level of 3mg/dL or more, and non-cisplatin-based regimen. Patients having 3 or 4 risk factors had higher risk for not being able to receive ST (Mann-Whitney U test, P < 0.001). As risk factors for OS in 230 patients who were able to receive ST, having no primary site resection, a neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio of 3 or more, and the presence of liver metastasis were identified. We reported the risk factors for OS in advanced UC patients treated with 1L chemotherapy in ST era. Patients with high risk for OS may not be able to proceed to subsequent ICI therapy even in the ST era.

Treatment Patterns and Attrition With Lines of Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma in the US

The treatment paradigm for advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) has undergone substantial transformation due to the introduction of effective, novel therapeutic agents. However, outcomes remain poor, and little is known about current treatment approaches and attrition rates for patients with aUC. To delineate evolving treatment patterns and attrition rates in patients with aUC using a US-based patient-level sample. This retrospective cohort study used patient-level data from the nationwide deidentified electronic health record database Flatiron Health, originating from approximately 280 oncology clinics across the US. Patients included in the analysis received treatment for metastatic or local aUC at a participating site from January 1, 2011, to January 31, 2023. Patients receiving treatment for 2 or more different types of cancer or participating in clinical trials were excluded from the analysis. Frequencies and percentages were used to summarize the (1) treatment received in each line (cisplatin-based regimens, carboplatin-based regimens, programmed cell death 1 and/or programmed cell death ligand 1 [PD-1/PD-L1] inhibitors, single-agent nonplatinum chemotherapy, enfortumab vedotin, erdafitinib, sacituzumab govitecan, or others) and (2) attrition of patients with each line of therapy, defined as the percentage of patients not progressing to the next line. Of the 12 157 patients within the dataset, 7260 met the eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis (5364 [73.9%] men; median age at the start of first-line treatment, 73 [IQR, 66-80] years). All patients commenced first-line treatment; of these, only 2714 (37.4%) progressed to receive second-line treatment, and 857 (11.8%) advanced to third-line treatment. The primary regimens used as first-line treatment contained carboplatin (2241 [30.9%]), followed by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (2174 [29.9%]). The PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors emerged as the predominant choice in the second- and third-line (1412 of 2714 [52.0%] and 258 of 857 [30.1%], respectively) treatments. From 2019 onward, novel therapeutic agents were increasingly used in second- and third-line treatments, including enfortumab vedotin (219 of 2714 [8.1%] and 159 of 857 [18.6%], respectively), erdafitinib (39 of 2714 [1.4%] and 28 of 857 [3.3%], respectively), and sacituzumab govitecan (14 of 2714 [0.5%] and 34 of 857 [4.0%], respectively). The findings of this cohort study suggest that approximately two-thirds of patients with aUC did not receive second-line treatment. Most first-line treatments do not include cisplatin-based regimens and instead incorporate carboplatin- or PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based therapies. These data warrant the provision of more effective and tolerable first-line treatments for patients with aUC.

Combination therapies targeting different aspects of tumor biology for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma

Combination therapies targeting different aspects of tumor biology for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma

Simple predictors for the completion of scheduled gemcitabine‑cisplatin regimens based on real‑world urothelial cancer data.

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) is the standard first line of chemotherapy for urothelial carcinoma. However, it is often difficult to complete scheduled GC therapy because of real-world adverse events. Therefore, the reasons behind delays, scheduled cancelations and determined predictive factors for completing scheduled GC therapy were retrospectively analyzed. Patients diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma from 2009 to 2020 received a 4-week GC therapy schedule in Oita University Hospital. Information was retrospectively extracted from medical records and all cycles were divided into two groups: One wherein all treatments were administered and completed on schedule and the other wherein treatment was either delayed or canceled in during the treatment schedule. Predictive factors were then statistically extracted between the two groups. In total, 70 patients received 201 cycles of a 4-week scheduled GC therapy. Of the 201 cycles, a total of 68 (33.8%) completed all scheduled treatments, while 133 (66.1%) did not complete the treatment as scheduled. In the group where administration was not completed on schedule, the factors of male, ureteral cancer, lower stage, <90% of gemcitabine and cisplatin dosage, solitary kidney, high creatinine level, low estimated glomerular filtration rate level, low platelet count and high alkaline phosphatase level at the initiation of each cycle were more significant. Additionally, the lowest anticancer drug percentage administration was on day 15. From these results, predictive factors for patients with various backgrounds who completed the scheduled 4-week GC therapy based on real-world data were identified. This information can be useful for clinical physicians when deciding the course of treatment.

Exploring Contribution of HMGA2 to the Aggressive Tumor Structure in Urothelial Carcinoma to Identify Prospective Clinical Applications

For patients with advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), the five-year survival rate is approximately 20-40%. In previous real-world data analyses, we observed that UTUC patients with a sessile tumor architecture tend to exhibit more aggressive behavior and concurrently have poorer outcomes in terms of metastasis-free and cancer-specific survival. This suggests that tumor architecture may serve as a crucial prognostic factor for predicting outcomes. We utilized various tumor tissue specimens, categorizing them based on tumor architecture into papillary and sessile groups. RNA sequencing was used to analyze the two groups, and significant differences in the expression levels of high mobility group AT-hook 2 (HMGA2) were found. In the more aggressive sessile tumor architecture, HMGA2 exhibited higher expression levels. HMGA2 is currently known to participate in various biological processes, including the cell cycle, DNA damage repair, apoptosis, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Additionally, HMGA2 is abnormally regulated in several human cancers, such as lung, breast, ovarian, and bladder cancers. Elevated expression of HMGA2 is associated with a higher risk of tumor recurrence and cancer progression. Hence, we hypothesize that HMGA2 may regulate tumor cell epithelial-mesenchymal transition through the PI3K-Akt cell signaling pathway, influencing tumor architecture and cancer prognosis. Attempting to downregulate HMGA2 should theoretically enhance the effectiveness of chemotherapeutic drugs in achieving an anti-cancer effect. We discovered that inhibiting the expression of HMGA2 using siRNA in UTUC cells, such as BFTC909, significantly reduces cell proliferation and migration. Moreover, the addition of an HMGA2 inhibitor known as suramin enhances cytotoxic effects and decreases cell migration. Our preliminary findings provide evidence indicating a correlation between high levels of HMGA2 expression and aggressive tumor architecture in UTUC. We designed UTUC patient-derived organoids (PDO). The test results revealed that the organoids, as indicated by HE stain and Ki67 immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, closely resembled their corresponding parental tumors. Currently, it appears that the organoids have retained the original tumor structure and protein molecular expression characteristics. The PDO model is hoped to serve as a valuable tool in aiding the selection of suitable therapeutic strategies as clinical applications. This study was funded by the Chang Gung Medical Foundation, Taiwan (CMRPG8M0131, and CMRPG8M0132) and the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 111-2314-B-182A-140). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Comparing survival in trial- versus routine-care advanced urothelial cancer patients on immune checkpoint blockade.

Although recent trials involving first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors have expanded treatment options for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) who are ineligible for standard cisplatin-based chemotherapy, there exists limited evidence for whether trial efficacy translates into real-world effectiveness for patients seen in routine care. This retrospective cohort study compares differences in overall survival (OS) between KEYNOTE-052 trial participants and routine-care patients receiving first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy. A routine-care patient cohort was constructed from the Flatiron Health database using trial eligibility criteria and was weighted to balance EHR and trial patient characteristics using matching-adjusted indirect comparisons. The routine-care cohort was older, more likely to be female, and more often cisplatin-ineligible due to renal dysfunction. ECOG performance status was comparable between the cohorts. Median OS was 9 months (95% CI 7-16) in the weighted routine-care cohort and 11.3 months (9.7-13.1) in the trial cohort. No significant differences between the Kaplan-Meier OS curves were detected (p = 0.76). Survival probabilities were similar between the weighted routine-care and trial cohorts at 12-, 24-, and 36- months (0.45 vs. 0.47, 0.31 vs. 0.31, 0.26 vs. 0.23, respectively). Notably, routine care patients had modestly lower survival at 3 months compared to trial participants (0.69 vs. 0.83, respectively). Our results provide reassurance that cisplatin-ineligible aUC patients receiving first-line immunotherapy in routine care experience similar benefits to those observed in trial patients.

Targeted and immunotherapy for the management of advanced urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. The activity of targeted and immunotherapy for the management of advanced bladder cancer is reviewed. Platinum-based chemotherapy is standard first-line treatment for advanced bladder cancer. Pembrolizumab is approved alone as first-line therapy for patients who are ineligible for any platinum-based chemotherapy and with enfortumab for patients ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Avelumab is approved for maintenance therapy in patients who have not progressed with first-line platinum-containing therapy. Pembrolizumab, avelumab, and nivolumab are approved second-line therapy in patients who experience progression during or after platinum-containing chemotherapy. Erdafitinib is indicated for advanced disease that has susceptible FGFR2 or FGFR3 genetic alterations and has progressed during or after treatment with at least one line of platinum-containing chemotherapy. Enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan are antibody-drug conjugates. They are both approved for patients who have received anti-PD-L1 or anti-PD-1 therapy and treatment with platinum-containing chemotherapy. Enfortumab is also indicated for patients who are ineligible to receive cisplatin-based therapy and have received one or more prior lines of therapy. Six targeted and immunotherapeutic agents have been approved for patients with advanced urothelial bladder cancer. They all have demonstrated activity in patients for whom disease has progressed during or after platinum-based therapy. Pembrolizumab, with and without enfortumab, has demonstrated first-line activity, and avelumab is a key maintenance therapy after first-line treatment. The results of additional clinical trials should provide evidence to establish the exact role in therapy of each agent in patients with advanced disease.

C-Reactive Protein Is a Potential Prognostic Marker in Patient with Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study.

In the EV-301 trial, enfortumab vedotin prolonged survival in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma previously treated with platinum-based therapy and programmed cell death 1/programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor. However, real-world Asian data are limited, and potential prognostic markers are non-existent. We aimed to investigate potential prognostic markers for enfortumab vedotin therapy in Asian patients. We retrospectively enrolled 61 Japanese patients treated with enfortumab vedotin therapy at our hospital and affiliated hospitals between January 2019 and September 2023. Enrolled patients (38 men, 23 women; median age 74 [IQR: 68-79] years) had bladder cancer (26 patients) or upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (35 patients). Fifty-four patients reported adverse events (grade >3 in 12). Skin disorders, pruritus, and neuropathy were common adverse effects. The median overall survival was 17.1 months (95% confidence interval: 10.0-not applicable). In multivariate analysis, the C-reactive protein level was an independent marker predicting favorable overall survival with enfortumab vedotin. Patient characteristics did not differ between C-reactive protein-high and -low groups. Our study provides real-world data showing that enfortumab vedotin prolonged survival in Asian patients similar to the EV-301 trial. Additionally, the C-reactive protein level might be considered a prognostic marker of enfortumab vedotin therapy in such patients.

STAT3 Contributes a Favorable Response to Pembrolizumab Through IFN-γ-induced Apoptosis in Urothelial Cancer.

Pembrolizumab, a second-line therapy for platinum-refractory advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC), is needed to improve objective response rate. Hence, it is crucial to identify optimal predictive biomarkers of responses. This study aimed to clarify the predictive value and role of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) in selecting patients with advanced UC who might benefit clinically from pembrolizumab therapy. We retrospectively analyzed 31 patients who received pembrolizumab therapy for UC. STAT3, phosphorylated STAT3 (p-STAT3), and PD-L1 expression were determined using tissue microarrays constructed from patient-derived specimens, and the association of these expression levels with overall survival was analyzed. We assessed the functional role of STAT3 in bladder cancer cell lines in response to interferon-gamma (IFN-γ). Patients with high STAT3 or p-STAT3 expression, and high platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (n=6) had a significantly shorter OS; in the other patients (n=25), high STAT3 or p-STAT3 expression was significantly associated with improved prognosis. IFN-γ-induced apoptosis was partially dependent on STAT3 in T24 cells but not in JMSU1 cells. In patients with advanced UC, STAT3 plays a key role in mediating the efficacy of pembrolizumab through apoptosis in response to IFN-γ.

Association Between Serum Magnesium Levels and Outcomes of Atezolizumab in Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.

Evidence suggests that serum magnesium levels are associated with outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, this association remains under-explored in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) treated with ICIs. This prognostic study used individual participant-level data from 1,281 patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC treated with atezolizumab (N=855) or chemotherapy (N=426) who participated in the IMvigor210 and the IMvigor211 trials. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression and Fine-Gray subdistribution hazards regression models were used to examine the association of baseline serum magnesium levels with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). No evidence of an association was found between baseline serum magnesium levels and PFS or OS in patients treated with atezolizumab [PFS, hazard ratio (HR)=1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.78-1.35; OS, HR=1.13, 95%CI=0.84-1.51] or chemotherapy (PFS, HR=0.93, 95%CI=0.62-1.40; OS, HR=0.91, 95%CI=0.59-1.40). We also found no evidence of association with irAEs (subdistribution HR=1.29, 95%CI=0.81-2.07) in patients receiving atezolizumab. This study found no evidence of an association between baseline serum magnesium levels and treatment outcomes or irAEs in patients with metastatic UC receiving atezolizumab. Contrary to previous research suggesting a role for magnesium in cancer therapy, these results indicate that serum magnesium levels may not serve as a biomarker to predict outcomes in these patients.

First-line Avelumab plus Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: Results from the Phase Ib/II JAVELIN Chemotherapy Medley Study.

Chemotherapy can potentially enhance the activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors by promoting immune priming. The phase Ib/II JAVELIN Chemotherapy Medley trial (NCT03317496) evaluated first-line avelumab + concurrent chemotherapy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Avelumab 800 or 1,200 mg was administered continuously every 3 weeks with standard doses of cisplatin + gemcitabine in patients with urothelial carcinoma, or carboplatin + pemetrexed in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC. Dual primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT; phase Ib) and confirmed objective response (phase Ib/II). In phase Ib, urothelial carcinoma and NSCLC cohorts received avelumab 800 mg (n = 13 and n = 6, respectively) or 1,200 mg (n = 6 each) + chemotherapy. In evaluable patients with urothelial carcinoma treated with avelumab 800 or 1,200 mg + chemotherapy, DLT occurred in 1/12 (8.3%) and 1/6 (16.7%), respectively; no DLT occurred in the NSCLC cohort. In phase II, 35 additional patients with urothelial carcinoma received avelumab 1,200 mg + chemotherapy. Across all treated patients, safety profiles were similar irrespective of avelumab dose. Objective response rates (95% confidence internal) with avelumab 800 or 1,200 mg + chemotherapy, respectively, across phase Ib/II, were 53.8% (25.1-80.8) and 39.0% (24.2-55.5) in urothelial carcinoma, and 50.0% (11.8-88.2) and 33.3% (4.3-77.7) in NSCLC. Preliminary efficacy and safety findings with avelumab + chemotherapy in urothelial carcinoma and NSCLC were consistent with previous studies of similar combination regimens. Conclusions about clinical activity are limited by small patient numbers. This phase Ib/II trial evaluated avelumab (immune checkpoint inhibitor) administered concurrently with standard first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma or advanced nonsquamous NSCLC without actionable mutations. Efficacy and safety appeared consistent with previous studies of similar combinations, although patient numbers were small.

Immunotherapy for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: an abridged Cochrane review.

To assess the effects of immunotherapy compared to chemotherapy as first- and second-line treatment of advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Based on a published protocol, we performed a systematic search of multiple databases. Two review authors independently performed the literature selection, identified relevant studies, assessed the eligibility of studies for inclusion, and extracted data. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model and assessed the quality of the evidence on a per-outcome basis according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. We included five randomised controlled trials and also identified seven single-arm studies. When used as first-line therapy, immunotherapy probably has little to no effect on the risk of death from any cause compared to chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-1.07; moderate-certainty evidence). immunotherapy probably has little to no effect on health-related quality of life (mean difference [MD] 4.10, 95% CI 3.83-4.37; moderate). Immunotherapy probably reduces grade 3-5 adverse events (risk ratio [RR] 0.47, 95% CI 0.29-0.75; moderate). In the second-line setting immunotherapy may reduce the risk of death from any cause (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.63-0.81; low). Immunotherapy may have little to no effect on health-related quality of life when compared to chemotherapy (MD 4.82, 95% CI -3.11 to 12.75; low). Immunotherapy may reduce grade 3-5 adverse events (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.97; low). Compared to chemotherapy, immunotherapy has little to no effect on the risk of death from any cause in a first-line setting. Nevertheless, it may reduce the risk of death from any cause when used as second-line therapy. The health-related quality of life of participants receiving first- and second-line therapy does not appear to be affected by immunotherapy. Immunotherapy probably reduces or may reduce grade 3-5 adverse events when used as first- and second-line therapy, respectively.