Advanced Subspecialty Research Articles

Residency Mini-fellowships in the PGY-5 Year: Is There Added Value?

With the restructuring of radiology board certification, many residencies created PGY-5 "mini-fellowships," during which residents spend focused time pursuing advanced subspecialty training or developing nonclinical skills in leadership, health policy and health-care economics, education, quality improvement, informatics, research, or global health. We surveyed graduates of an academic diagnostic radiology residency to assess the relative value and impact of PGY-5 mini-fellowships on career satisfaction and success. From 2012 to 2016, 39 radiology residents at our institution were offered the opportunity to pursue a 3- to 6-month mini-fellowship during the PGY-5 year. Thirty of 39 radiology residents (77%) participated, whereas 9 of 39 (23%) opted out. Of 39 residents, 13 completed two clinical mini-fellowships, 3 completed research mini-fellowships only, and 14 completed one nonclinical and one clinical mini-fellowship. Through SurveyMonkey, 23 of 39 residents (59%) responded to a questionnaire that collected basic demographic information and asked respondents about the value of this experience as it relates to fellowship choice and career using a five-point Likert scale. Of 23 respondents (14 male, 8 female,1 not specified), 78.3% practice in an academic university-based setting, with 8.7% in a community-based hospital practice, 4.3% in the veterans system, and 4.3% in a private practice setting. Of 23 respondents, the most popular clinical mini-fellowships were magnetic resonance imaging (31.6%), neuroradiology (21.1%), and interventional radiology (15.8%). For nonclinical mini-fellowships, the most popular were research (10.5%), education (10.5%), global health (5.3%), and healthcare economics (5.3%). Of 23 respondents who did mini-fellowships, 95% felt that the mini-fellowship prepared them well for their career, 85% felt it gave them the necessary skills to succeed, 85% cited that it gave them additional skills beyond their peers, and 40% felt it helped them create a life-long connection to a mentor. Ninety-five percent of respondents would choose to do the mini-fellowship again. Respondents suggested increasing the duration to 6-9 months and to develop a more structured curriculum and mentorship component. Only one respondent felt that the nonclinical mini-fellowship took away time from furthering clinical skills. Graduates of a university-affiliated academic radiology residency who participated in clinical and nonclinical mini-fellowships during the PGY-5 year of residency greatly value this experience and uniformly recommend that this type of program continue to be offered to trainees given its ability to develop skills perceived to be vital to ultimate career satisfaction and success.

Neuroendovascular Fellowship Training: Self-Assessment of a Program Accredited by the Committee on Advanced Subspecialty Training.

The University at Buffalo's neuroendovascular fellowship is one of the longest running fellowship programs in North America. The burgeoning neurointerventional workforce and the rapid growth in the neurointerventional space on the heels of groundbreaking clinical trials prompted us to assess the fellowship's academic impact and its graduates' perceptions and productivity. An anonymized web-based survey was sent to all former neuroendovascular fellows with specific questions pertaining to current practice, research and funding, and perceptions about the fellowship's impact on their skills, competitiveness, and compensation. Additionally, the h-index was calculated to assess the academic productivity of each graduated fellow. Among 50 former fellows, 42 (84%) completed the survey. The fellows came from various countries, ethnic backgrounds, and specialties including neurosurgery (n = 39, 93%), neurology (n = 2, 5%), and neuroradiology (n = 1, 2%). Twenty (48%) respondents were currently chairs or directors of their practice. Most (n = 30, 71%) spent at least 10% of their time on research activities, with 27 (64%) receiving research funding. The median h-index of all 50 former fellows was 14. The biggest gains from the fellowship were reported to be improvement in endovascular skills (median = 10 on a scale of 0-10 [highest]) and increase in competitiveness for jobs in vascular neurosurgery (median = 10), followed by increase in academic productivity (median = 8), and knowledge of vascular disease (median = 8). In an era with open calls for moratoriums on endovascular fellowships, concerns over market saturation, and pleas to improve training, fellowship programs perhaps merit a more objective assessment. The effectiveness of a fellowship program may best be measured by the academic impact and leadership roles of former fellows.

A Hybrid Form of Telemedicine: A Unique Way to Extend Intensive Care Service to Neonates in Medically Underserved Areas.

More than 90% of neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in the United States are in urban areas, denying rural residents' easy NICU access. Telemedicine use for patient contact and management, although studied in adults and children, is understudied in neonates. A hybrid telemedicine system, with 24/7 neonatal nurse practitioner coverage and with a neonatologist physically present 3 days per week and telemedicine coverage the remaining days, was recently implemented at Comanche County Memorial Hospital's (CCMH) Level II NICU. To compare outcomes of moderately ill infants between 32-35 weeks gestational age (GA) managed by our hybrid telemedicine program with outcomes of similar neonates receiving standard care in a Level IV NICU at Oklahoma University Medical Center (OUMC). This was a retrospective, noninferiority study comparing outcomes of neonates receiving hybrid telemedicine versus standard care. All 32-35 weeks GA infants admitted between July 2013 and June 2015 were included. OUMC infants came from areas geographically comparable with CCMH. Infants requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation or advanced subspecialty services were excluded. Outcome variables were length of stay, type and duration of respiratory support, length of antibiotic therapy, and time to full enteral feedings. Eighty-seven neonates at CCMH and 56 neonates at OUMC were included in the analysis. Compared with neonates at OUMC, neonates at CCMH had shorter hospitalizations, fewer days of supplemental oxygen, and fewer noninvasive ventilation support days, and reached full enteral feeds sooner. The hybrid telemedicine system is a safe and effective strategy for extending intensive care to neonates in medically underserved areas.

“Sports Ultrasound”, advantages, indications and limitations in upper and lower limbs musculoskeletal disorders. Review article

Ultrasonography (US) is a safe and noninvasive imaging modality that is gaining popularity in different medical and surgical fields. Its introduction in musculoskeletal and sports medicine has taken this advanced subspecialty to a higher level. It has the advantage over other imaging techniques with regards to ease of use, availability, comfort and cost. Not to mention, in terms of safety profile, patients are not exposed to radiations, like in x-rays, and it can be performed on patients with metal or pacemaker implants, which are contraindicated in MRI. Standard diagnostic sonography doesn't have any known harmful effects on humans. In this article we will discuss the role of ultrasound in sports medicine, highlighting the diagnostic and interventional indications, uses and limitations.

Training Standards in Neuroendovascular Surgery: Program Accreditation and Practitioner Certification.

Neuroendovascular surgery is a medical subspecialty that uses minimally invasive catheter-based technology and radiological imaging to diagnose and treat diseases of the central nervous system, head, neck, spine, and their vasculature. To perform these procedures, the practitioner needs an extensive knowledge of the anatomy of the nervous system, vasculature, and pathological conditions that affect their physiology. A working knowledge of radiation biology and safety is essential. Similarly, a sufficient volume of clinical and interventional experience, first as a trainee and then as a practitioner, is required so that these treatments can be delivered safely and effectively. This document has been prepared under the aegis of the Society of Neurological Surgeons and its Committee for Advanced Subspecialty Training in conjunction with the Joint Section of Cerebrovascular Surgery for the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons, the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, and the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology. The material herein outlines the requirements for institutional accreditation of training programs in neuroendovascular surgery, as well as those needed to obtain individual subspecialty certification, as agreed on by Committee for Advanced Subspecialty Training, the Society of Neurological Surgeons, and the aforementioned Societies. This document also clarifies the pathway to certification through an advanced practice track mechanism for those current practitioners of this subspecialty who trained before Committee for Advanced Subspecialty Training standards were formulated. Representing neuroendovascular surgery physicians from neurosurgery, neuroradiology, and neurology, the above mentioned societies seek to standardize neuroendovascular surgery training to ensure the highest quality delivery of this subspecialty within the United States.

Pediatric pain psychology: Guidelines for advanced subspecialty training.

Pediatric pain psychology: Guidelines for advanced subspecialty training.

Preparedness of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents for Fellowship Training.

To evaluate the perceptions of fellowship program directors of incoming clinical fellows for subspecialty training. A validated survey by the American College of Surgeons was modified and distributed to all fellowship program directors in four subspecialties within obstetrics and gynecology: female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery, gynecologic oncology, maternal-fetal medicine, and reproductive endocrinology-infertility. The 59-item survey explored five domains concerning preparedness for fellowship: professionalism, independent practice, psychomotor ability, clinical evaluation, and academic scholarship. A Likert scale with five responses was used and tailored to each subspecialty. Standard statistical methods were used to compare responses between subspecialties and to analyze data within each subspecialty individually. One hundred thirty directors completed the survey, for a response rate of 60%. In the domain of professionalism, more than 88% of participants stated that incoming fellows had appropriate interactions with faculty and staff. Scores in this domain were lower for gynecologic oncology respondents (P=.046). Responses concerning independent practice of surgical procedures (hysterectomy, pelvic reconstruction, and minimally invasive) were overwhelmingly negative. Only 20% of first-year fellows were able to independently perform a vaginal hysterectomy, 46% an abdominal hysterectomy, and 34% basic hysteroscopic procedures. Appropriate postoperative care (63%) and management of the critically ill patient (71%) were rated adequate for all subspecialties. Graduating residents may be underprepared for advanced subspecialty training, necessitating an evaluation of the current structure of resident and fellow curriculum. III.

The expert-generalist: a contradiction whose time has come.

The author suggests the creation of expert-generalists to help provide the additional cost-effective access to care necessitated by increased insurance coverage under the Affordable Care Act. Expert-generalists, a concept drawn from an extant Canadian model, would be a cohort of primary care physicians who obtain additional training in a subspecialty area, which would widen their practice portfolio and bring enhanced infrastructure to primary care settings. Expanding the reach of primary care into the realm of more advanced subspecialty practice could be a way to enhance both access to and quality of care in a cost-effective fashion, in part because the educational framework for additional training already exists. Trainees could opt for an extra year of training after traditional residency or return to training after years in practice. Properly trained, an expert-generalist would benefit both the quality of the patient experience and the bottom line by expertly triaging patients to determine who will truly benefit from specialty consultations, decreasing specialists' engagement with cases that do not require their higher-tier care. The author considers the merits of this proposal, as well as potential objections and implementation challenges. It is suggested that this model be adopted incrementally, using demonstration projects that could assess the impact of an expert-generalist initiative on the physician workforce and on patients' access to quality primary and specialty care.

Virtual Rheumatology

Arthrocentesis is an important skill for medical practitioners at all levels of training. Previous studies have indicated a low comfort level and performance of arthrocentesis among primary care physicians that could be improved with hands-on training. The objective of this study was to improve comfort with knee and shoulder arthrocentesis at all levels of medical training, including medical students, internal medicine residents, and rheumatology subspecialty residents, and in arthrocentesis of the elbow, wrist, and ankle for advanced subspecialty residents in rheumatology through the use of a formal workshop using simulators. Fourth-year medical students and internal medicine residents were recruited from the University of South Florida. The rheumatology advanced subspecialty residents were participants from University of South Florida and from the American College of Rheumatology national meetings in 2008 and 2009. A 1-hour PowerPoint lecture followed by a hands-on practice session using Sawbones models (shoulder and knee for all groups, and elbow, wrist, and ankle additionally for the advanced subspecialty residents). A preworkshop self-assessment survey allowed the participant to rate his/her comfort level with arthrocentesis on a scale of 1 to 5. A survey with identical questions was completed immediately after the workshop. A follow-up survey was distributed by e-mail 3 to 6 months after the workshop. One hundred forty-one medical students, 75 internal medicine residents, and 39 rheumatology subspecialty residents participated from January 2008 until January 2010. Mean comfort level in knee and shoulder arthrocentesis improved from preworkshop comfort level for all joints and among all participants. In addition, rheumatology subspecialty resident mean comfort level improved for ankle from 2.37 to 3.65, elbow from 2.56 to 3.80, and wrist from 2.31 to 3.77 (P < 0.0001). Our study involved a very large number of participants encompassing different levels of training and is the largest number of advanced subspecialty rheumatology residents studied with regard to joint injection training. We have confirmed that a formal joint injection workshop using simulators is an effective method of improving comfort level in arthrocentesis among participants from all levels of medical training. Future studies should evaluate the effect of such training on actual clinical use and competence.

Are United States Medical Licensing Exam Step 1 and 2 Scores Valid Measures for Postgraduate Medical Residency Selection Decisions?

United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores are frequently used by residency program directors when evaluating applicants. The objectives of this report are to study the chain of reasoning and evidence that underlies the use of USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores for postgraduate medical resident selection decisions and to evaluate the validity argument about the utility of USMLE scores for this purpose. This is a research synthesis using the critical review approach. The study first describes the chain of reasoning that underlies a validity argument about using test scores for a specific purpose. It continues by summarizing correlations of USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores and reliable measures of clinical skill acquisition drawn from nine studies involving 393 medical learners from 2005 to 2010. The integrity of the validity argument about using USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores for postgraduate residency selection decisions is tested. The research synthesis shows that USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores are not correlated with reliable measures of medical students', residents', and fellows' clinical skill acquisition. The validity argument about using USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores for postgraduate residency selection decisions is neither structured, coherent, nor evidence based. The USMLE score validity argument breaks down on grounds of extrapolation and decision/interpretation because the scores are not associated with measures of clinical skill acquisition among advanced medical students, residents, and subspecialty fellows. Continued use of USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores for postgraduate medical residency selection decisions is discouraged.

Careers in Basic Cardiovascular Research

Received August 2, 2008; accepted January 28, 2009. The opportunities in basic science for graduating PhD students and for aspiring physician-scientists have never been so extraordinary. The sequencing of the human genome and the development of the human haplotype map have enabled scientists to begin to unravel the basis of complex multigenic disorders. Rapid developments in stem cell biology are affecting many areas of cardiovascular biology and may enable repair of injured myocardium. High-throughput chemical genetic screening, proteomics, and metabolomics are changing the approaches with which investigators characterize novel signal transduction pathways and develop new therapeutic paradigms. Rapidly evolving molecular imaging technologies are noninvasively illuminating the fundamental processes contributing to cardiovascular diseases. New insights into the mechanisms involved in cardiac myocyte hypertrophy and dysfunction have important therapeutic implications for an expanding population of patients with congestive heart failure. For the young scientist looking to the future, there are major benefits in pursuing a basic science career including the excitement of discovery, the opportunity for life-long learning, and the potential to broadly affect cardiovascular science and medicine. On the other hand, the young investigator considering a basic science career is confronted by many challenges. The budget of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has remained essentially unchanged for 5 years (when the impact of inflation is considered). The success rate of R01 grant applications has consistently declined since 2000, and the average age when an investigator receives a first R01 grant (or equivalent) increased to 42.6 in 2007 (NIH Extramural Data Book at www.report.nih.gov/index.aspx). At the same time, the increased costs of undergraduate and medical school educations have burdened potential young investigators with ever-increasing financial commitments. Many academic leaders have suggested that an entire generation of young scientists is “at risk” (www.BrokenPipeline. org). Long hours at the laboratory bench are compensated …

My Old Kentucky Home, Goodnight: Potential Impact of Planned Changes in the Radiology Board Certification Process

1149 more advanced subspecialty questions. Although the content of the examinations will become more specialty-specific, the Board still plans to certify graduates broadly as diagnostic radiologists. The Board is currently not planning to publish the specific makeup of each individual’s tailored examination. This policy brief examines how these changes—specifically those of (1) content and (2) timing of the oral board examination— may impact the major radiology stakeholders in the certification process: training programs, academic centers, private groups, and individual radiologists.

Outcomes of glaucoma filtration surgery within the Morecambe Bay Health Trust

Glaucoma filtering surgery has evolved over the years from full-thickness fistulas, the standard practice in the 1950s, to partial-thickness fistulas or trabeculectomy, made popular in the 1960s. The newer procedures of deep sclerectomy and viscocanaliculostomy are nonpenetrating procedures, more difficult technically and require advanced subspecialty training, but are claimed to be associated with less complications. Gilbert Ozuzu, consultant ophthalmologist, and his colleagues describe an audit of their practice across Morecambe Bay.

Neonatal physical therapy: Medical risks and professional education

Issues in professional education for the subspecialty, neonatal physical therapy, are addressed with a focus on both entry-level programs and advanced-level professional training. An overview is given of medical risks and potential adverse consequences of neonatal physical therapy if the service is delivered by professionals without advanced subspecialty training. Pediatric experience and criteria for precepted clinical training for practice in neonatal physical therapy are outlined, and an eased-entry approach to organizing advanced-level neonatal physical therapy training is introduced.