Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Research Articles

Cabozantinib use in second or subsequent line of treatment in renal cell carcinoma: an analysis of Italian administrative databases.

Cabozantinib use in everyday clinical practice for advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is relatively recent, and real-world data on treatment persistence, adherence and sequencing are still limited. We conducted an analysis based on an integrated administrative database, covering around 6.9 million health-assisted Italian individuals, to explore the use of cabozantinib for RCC. Patients with at least one prescription for cabozantinib during 2017-2020 were searched. These were characterized during all available period (i.e. from 2010 onwards) before the index date and were observed after inclusion. A total of 113 patients treated with cabozantinib in second or subsequent line were included, and their demographic, clinical and treatment characteristics were described. About half of these RCC patients were aged >65 years (47.8%). Sixty patients (53.1%) were highly adherent to cabozantinib therapy, and the median cabozantinib treatment duration of use was 8.7 months (95% confidence interval: 5.8-11.1). During the first year of follow-up, the average total cost per patient was €32,508. We described second or subsequent line cabozantinib treatment for RCC in a real-world setting and the economic burden of disease in Italy, taking advantage of large, integrated administrative databases.

Long-term responders to nivolumab in previously treated advanced renal cell carcinoma: a sub-analysis of meet-URO15 study

BackgroundAlthough nivolumab prolongs overall survival (OS) in pretreated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), underlining clinical and biological features of long-term responses are still to be determined. This study aims to investigate clinical and pathological characteristics of mRCC patients who achieved long-term responses during nivolumab treatment.Materials and methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on mRCC patients receiving nivolumab as second or further therapy line between May 2016 and January 2019 in 34 Italian Oncology Centres. Outcome assessments and logistic regression were performed to evaluate factors influencing long-term responses.ResultsA total of 571 patients with a median age of 61 years (range 17–85) were included in the analysis. With a median follow-up of 22.1 (1.0–89.0) months, 23.1% of patients were 2-year progression-free on treatment with nivolumab, hence they were categorized as long-term responders. Baseline characteristics, including age, gender, and histology, were similar between long- and short-term responders. Karnofsky Performance Status ≥ 80% was significantly associated with long-term response (p = 0.02), while bone metastases (p = 0.03), International mRCC Database Consortium intermediate-poor risk (p < 0.01) and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio ≥ 3.2 (p = 0.02) were associate with short-term responses. Long-term responders exhibited a median progression-free survival of 55.0 months versus 4.0 months of the short-term responders. The median OS was not reached in long-term responders while it was 17.0 months for short*term responders.ConclusionThis retrospective analysis sheds light on factors associated with long-term response to nivolumab in mRCC. Understanding these clinical features will be essential for selecting patients who may mostly benefit from immunotherapy.

Approaches to Treating High Risk and Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC): Key Trial Data That Impacts Treatment Decisions in the Clinic.

The treatment paradigm for high risk localized and advanced kidney cancer has been characterized by ongoing changes, with the introduction of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR TKIs) and later with immune checkpoint blockade. In this article, we review how current evidence informs our decision-making on post-checkpoint inhibitor systemic therapies, the role of adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant therapies, and the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the evolving systemic therapy landscape. While some studies support a post-checkpoint inhibitor benefit from the VEGFR TKIs cabozantinib or axitinib, the benefit of doublet therapies including a VEGF receptor inhibitor and a checkpoint inhibitor remains an area of active investigation, with the combination of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab showing promise but with a Phase III trial of the combination of atezolizumab plus cabozantinib showing no benefit over cabozantinib alone. The role of adjuvant therapy in patients with high-risk disease who have undergone cytoreductive nephrectomy and potentially metastasectomy is also an area of continuing interest. While the S-TRAC study demonstrated a disease-free survival benefit for adjuvant sunitinib, no overall survival benefit was shown, and multiple other studies of adjuvant VEGFR TKI therapy have been negative. Subsequently, adjuvant pembrolizumab has shown a benefit in overall survival, whereas trials of neoadjuvant and adjuvant nivolumab, adjuvant atezolizumab, and adjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab have all been negative. Finally, the role for cytoreductive nephrectomy continues to be an area of active debate. The CARMENA study raised important questions about the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy given the advances in VEGFR TKI therapy but was characterized by accrual difficulties and a significant number of patients not receiving treatment according to the study protocol. Two ongoing studies (NORDIC-SUN and PROBE) seek to further address the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in the doublet therapy era.

Final Analysis of a Noninterventional Study on Cabozantinib in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma After Prior Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy of the German Interdisciplinary Working Group on Renal Tumors (IAG-N)

BackgroundEfficacy of treatment after failure of check point inhibitors (ICI) therapy remains ill-defined in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cabozantinib after failure of ICI-based therapies. Design, setting and participantsPatients with mRCC who concluded cabozantinib treatment directly after an ICI-based therapy were eligible. Data was collected retrospectively from participating sites in Germany. InterventionsCabozantinib was administered as a standard of care. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisAdverse events (AE) were reported according to CTCAE v5.0. Objective response rate according to RECIST 1.1 and Progression Free Survival (PFS) were collected from medical records. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meyer-plots were utilized. Results and limitationsAbout 56 eligible patients (71.4% male) with median age of 66 years and clear cell histology in 66.1% (n = 37) were analyzed. 87.5% (n = 49) had ≥ 2 previous lines. IMDC risk was intermediate or poor in 17 patients (30.4%) and missing in 66.1%. 20 patients (35.7%) started with 60 mg. 55.4% (n = 31) required dose reductions, 26.8% (n = 15) treatment delays and 1.8% (n = 1) treatment discontinuation. Partial response was reported in 10.7% (n = 6), stable and progressive disease were reported in 19.6% (n = 11) and in 12.5% (n = 7). 32 patients were not evaluable (57.1%). Median treatment duration was 6.1 months. Treatment related AE were reported in 76.8% (n = 43) and 19.6% (n = 11) had grade 3-5. Fatigue (26.8%), diarrhea (26.8%) and hand-foot-syndrome (25.0%) were the 3 most frequent AEs of any grade and causality. SAE were reported in 21.4% (n = 12), 2 were fatal. Major limitation was the retrospective data capture in our study. ConclusionsCabozantinib followed directly after ICI-based therapy was safe and feasible. No new safety signals were reported. A lower starting dose was frequently utilized in this real-world cohort, which was associated with a favorable tolerability profile. Our data supports the use of cabozantinib after ICI treatment.

Feasibility of a Smartphone Application for Education and Symptom Management of Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma on Combined Tyrosine Kinase and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) face significant challenges, stemming both from the complexities of the disease itself and the adverse effects of treatments. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of a mobile health (mHealth) application tailored for education and symptom management of patients with advanced RCC receiving combined immune checkpoint inhibitor and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (ICI-TKI) therapy. The primary end points were acceptability and feasibility. Acceptability was defined as the proportion of patients approached who consented to participate, setting a benchmark of at least 50% for this metric. Feasibility was gauged by the completion rate of the intervention among the participants; it required at least 50% of participants to fully complete the intervention and at least 70% to finish half of the administered questionnaires. The secondary end points included knowledge assessment and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). PROs were evaluated using validated instruments. To discern the changes between pre- and post-educational module quiz scores, we used the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Time-course data of PROs were visualized using line plots and then compared using paired t-tests. From November 2022 to July 2023, 20 of 22 (90%) patients approached for the study consented and enrolled. Of the enrolled patients, 60% completed all questionnaires and knowledge assessments at every time point and 75% completed at least half of the surveys and questionnaires. Significant pre/post differences were noted in two of six quizzes in the knowledge assessment. This study population did not experience a significant change in PRO scores after starting therapy. The mHealth application designed for education and symptom management in patients with advanced RCC undergoing combination ICI-TKI has proven to be both acceptable and feasible, meeting previous research benchmarks.

Prognostic Impact of the Administration of Antibiotics and Proton Pump Inhibitors in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Combination Therapy for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

The prognostic impact of the administration of antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for advanced cancer has recently been documented. However, how these drugs affect the outcomes of first-line ICI combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unclear. We retrospectively evaluated the data of 128 patients with RCC who received first-line ICI combination therapy. The patients were grouped according to their history of antibiotics and PPIs use one month before the initiation of ICI combination therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) after ICI combination therapy were compared between patients treated with and without antibiotics or PPIs. Of the 128 patients, 30 (23%) and 44 (34%) received antibiotics and PPIs, respectively. Patients treated with antibiotics exhibited shorter PFS and OS compared to those who did not receive antibiotics (median PFS: 4.9 vs. 16.1 months, p<0.0001; OS: 20.8 vs. 49.0 months, p=0.0034). Multivariate analyses showed that antibiotic administration was an independent predictor of shorter PFS (hazard ratio: 2.54: p=0.0002) and OS (hazard ratio: 2.56: p=0.0067) after adjusting for other covariates. In contrast, there were no significant differences in either PFS or OS between patients who received PPIs and those who did not. (PFS: p=0.828; OS: p=0.105). Antibiotics administration before ICI combination therapy was negatively associated with outcomes of first-line ICI combination therapy for advanced RCC. Therefore, careful monitoring is required for potentially high-risk patients undergoing ICI combination therapy.

The JAK-STAT signaling-related signature serves as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for renal cell carcinoma immunotherapy

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents a significant portion of genitourinary cancers, marked by challenging prognosis and high metastasis rates. Immunotherapy has been applied in managing advanced renal cell carcinoma, but the therapeutic outcomes are unsatisfactory. In this study, we order to construct a Janus kinase/signal transduction and activator transcriptional (JAK/STAT)-related signature linked to kidney patient outcomes for better predicting the efficacy to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and to provide guidance for effective combination therapy. We screened 25 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that exhibited high expression in RCC samples and were enriched in the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. Among these genes, 11 key genes were identified and correlated with the expectation of Kidney Clear Cell Carcinoma (KIRC) patients and all these genes was significantly elevated in RCC tumor tissues and cancer cells compared to para-cancer tissues and normal renal cells. Utilizing these 11 genes, we divided RCC patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. We found a clear correlation between the clinicopathologic factors of KIRC patients and the JAK-STAT-related risk score. And the IHC results shown that the JAK3 and STAT4 expression of tumor was significantly higher than normal tissue in RCC patients, the level of JAK3 and STAT4 was positively related to the T stage of RCC patients. In addition, high-risk patients had a poorer prognosis and greater protumor immune cell infiltration, and benefitted less from immunotherapy than did low-risk patients. Furthermore, the JAK-STAT-related risk score can predict disease-free survival (DFS) in RCC patients according to the nomogram, which constructed in combination with other clinical features such as age, TNM-staging and stage. Our study demonstrated the JAK-STAT signaling pathway’s important regulatory function in RCC tumor immunity. This insight not only enhances our ability to accurately predict the survival rate of RCC patients, but also underscores a potential therapeutic alternative for RCC, involving the combined targeting of the JAK-STAT pathway and immune checkpoints.

Reasonability of Frequent Laboratory Analyses during Therapy with Nivolumab and Nivolumab+Ipilimumab in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma during the Phase 2 Clinical Trial TITAN-RCC.

In clinical trials, laboratory values are assessed with high frequency. This can be stressful for patients, resource intensive, and difficult to implement, for example in office-based settings. In the prospective, multicentre phase 2 TITAN-RCC trial (NCT02917772), we investigated how many relevant changes in laboratory values would have been missed if laboratory values had been assessed less frequently. Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (n = 207) received a response-based approach with nivolumab and nivolumab+ipilimumab boosts for non-response. We simulated that laboratory values were obtained before every second dose instead of every dose of the study drug(s). We assessed elevated leukocyte counts, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, bilirubin, creatinine, amylase, lipase, and thyroid-stimulating hormone. Dose delay and discontinuation criteria were defined according to the study protocol. With the reduced frequency of laboratory analyses, dose delay criteria were rarely missed: in a maximum of <0.1% (3/4382) of assessments (1% [2/207] of patients) during nivolumab monotherapy and in a maximum of 0.2% (1/465) of assessments (1% [1/132] of patients) during nivolumab+ipilimumab boosts. An exception was lipase-related dose delay which would have been missed in 0.6% (25/4204) of assessments (7% [15/207] of patients) during nivolumab monotherapy and in 0.8% (4/480) of assessments (3% [4/134] of patients) during nivolumab+ipilimumab boosts, but would have required the presence of symptoms. Discontinuation criteria would have only been missed for amylase (<0.1% [1/3965] of assessments [0.5% (1/207) of patients] during nivolumab monotherapy, none during nivolumab+ipilimumab boosts) and lipase (0.1% [5/4204] of assessments [2% (4/207) of patients] during nivolumab monotherapy; 0.2% [1/480] of assessments [0.7% (1/134) of patients] during nivolumab+ipilimumab boosts). However, only symptomatic patients would have had to discontinue treatment due to amylase or lipase laboratory values. In conclusion, a reduced frequency of laboratory testing appears to be acceptable in asymptomatic patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab or nivolumab+ipilimumab.

Analyses of tumor microenvironment in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving immunotherapy (Meet-URO 18 study).

Introduction: The Meet-URO 18 study is a multicentric study of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving nivolumab in the second-line and beyond, categorized as responders (progression-free survival ≥12 months) and non-responders (progression-free survival <3 months).Areas covered: The current study includes extensive immunohistochemical analysis of T-lineage markers (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD8/CD4 ratio), macrophages (CD68), ph-mTOR, CD15and CD56 expression on tumor cells, and PD-L1 expression, on an increased sample size including 161 tumor samples (113 patients) compared with preliminary presented data. Responders' tumor tissue (n = 90; 55.9%) was associated with lower CD4 expression (p = 0.014), higher CD56 expression (p = 0.046) and higher CD8/CD4 ratio (p = 0.030).Expert opinion/commentary: The present work suggests the regulatory role of a subpopulation of T cells on antitumor response and identifies CD56 as a putative biomarker of immunotherapy efficacy.

Identification of tumor-antigen signatures and immune subtypes for messenger RNA vaccine selection in advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma

BackgroundAdvanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma still lacks reliable diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Recently, tumor vaccines targeting specific molecules have been proposed as a promising treatment in mitigating tumor progression, which was rekindled under the background of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the application of messenger RNA vaccine against advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma antigens remains stagnant, and no subgroup of patients deemed suitable for vaccination has been extensively studied or validated. Our study aims to explore novel advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma antigen signatures to select suitable patients for vaccination. MethodsGene expression profiles of advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma samples and their corresponding clinical data were retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator model was applied to develop signatures to stratify patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to compare the prognostic accuracy of each factor. Tumor Immune Estimation Resource was used to visualize the relationship between the proportion of antigen-presenting cells and the expression of filtered genes. The "CIBERSORT" and "WGCNA" R Packages were employed to ascertain disparities in immune infiltration levels between advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma subgroups. The Search Tools for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes database and Cytoscape were used to construct the protein-protein interaction network. CCK-8 and colony formation assays were included in the invitro experiment. ResultsIn total, 244 potential tumor antigens were identified. Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression, 21 tumor antigens were selected for developing a risk evaluation signature. The risk score signature can be a useful tool to predict the outcome of advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients. According to the differential clinical, molecular, and immune-related genes, we divided advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients into the immune “cold” subtype and immune “hot” subtype. By developing a logistic score, the immune subtype signature can better distinguish a patient more likely to be immune “cold” subtype or immune “hot” subtype.Interestingly, patients with high risk scores had a higher proportion of immune “hot” subtype than those with a low risk score. Furthermore, the prognostic value was significantly improved when combining risk score and immune subtype. Distinct immune landscapes and signal pathways were observed between different tumor subtypes. Finally, novel tumor antigens related to oxidative stress were identified. ConclusionThe tumor-antigens–based risk score and immune subtype signatures identified potentially effective neo-antigens for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma messenger RNA vaccine development, and patients with low risk scores and immune “cold” subtype tumors are more prone to benefit from messenger RNA vaccination. Furthermore, our study highlights the significant role of oxidative stress in determining the efficacy of the messenger RNA vaccine.

Demographic Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma With Clear Cell Histology: A Single-Center Experience From India

Demographic Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma With Clear Cell Histology: A Single-Center Experience From India

Efficacy and Safety of Immuno-Oncology Plus Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors as Late-Line Combination Therapy for Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Background/Objectives: Immuno-oncology plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (IO+TKI) combination therapy is an essential first-line therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, reports of its efficacy and safety as late-line therapy are lacking. This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of IO+TKI combination therapy as a late-line therapy for patients with RCC. Methods: We retrospectively examined 17 patients with RCC who received IO+TKI combination therapy as a second-line therapy or beyond (pembrolizumab plus axitinib, n = 10; avelumab plus axitinib, n = 5; nivolumab plus cabozantinib, n = 2). Results: The overall response and disease control rates of IO+TKI combination therapy were 29.4% and 64.7%, respectively. The median overall survival was not attained. Progression-free survival was 552 days, and 94.1% of patients (n = 16) experienced adverse effects (AEs) of any grade; moreover, 41.2% of patients (n = 7) experienced grade ≥ 3 immuno-related AEs. Conclusions: IO+TKI combination therapy may be a late-line therapy option for RCC.

Real-world treatment trends for patients with advanced prostate cancer and renal cell carcinoma and their cost-a survey in Japan.

Advanced (Stage IV) prostate and renal cancer have poor prognosis, and several therapies have been developed, but many are very costly. This study investigated drug regimens used in patients with untreated Stage IV prostate cancer and renal cell carcinoma and calculated the monthly cost of each. We surveyed first-line drugs administered to patients with untreated Stage IV prostate cancer and renal cancer at Japan Clinical Oncology Group affiliated centers from April 2022 to March 2023. Drug costs were calculated according to drug prices in September 2023. Individual drug costs were calculated or converted to 28-day costs. A total of 700 patients with untreated Stage IV prostate cancer were surveyed. Androgen deprivation therapy + androgen receptor signaling inhibitor was the most common regimen (56%). The cost of androgen deprivation therapy+androgen receptor signaling inhibitor was 10.6-30.8-fold compared with conventional treatments. A total of 137 patients with Stage IV renal cancer were surveyed. Among them, 91% of patients received immune-oncology drug-based regimen. All patients received treatments with a monthly cost of ≥500 000 Japanese yen, and 80.4% of patients received treatments with a monthly cost of ≥1 million Japanese yen, of combination treatments. The cost of immune-oncology drug-based regimen was 1.2-3.1-fold that of TKI alone. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a survey of first-line drug therapy in untreated Stage IV prostate cancer and renal cell carcinoma stratified by age and treatment costs. Our results show that most Japanese patients received state-of-the-art, effective treatments with high financial burden.

Association between neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio and efficacy outcomes with avelumab plus axitinib or sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: post hoc analyses from the JAVELIN Renal 101 trial

ObjectiveWe report post hoc analyses of efficacy with first-line avelumab plus axitinib or sunitinib according to baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) from the...

Neoadjuvant toripalimab combined with axitinib in patients with locally advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a single-arm, phase II trial

BackgroundA combination of axitinib and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) demonstrated promising efficacy in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This study aims to prospectively evaluate the safety, efficacy,...

Real-world Treatment Sequencing and Outcomes With Cabozantinib After First-line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-based Combination Therapy For Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: CARINA Study Results

IntroductionReal-world data are limited on treatment sequencing and outcomes after first-line (1L) immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-based combination treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). Patients and MethodsIn this real-world, UK-based, retrospective study (CARINA; NCT04957160), data were obtained from hospital and electronic prescribing records. Patients were aged ≥ 18 years at aRCC diagnosis and had received 1L CPI–CPI or tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)–CPI combination therapy before second-line (2L) therapy including cabozantinib. We describe treatment outcomes including 1L and 2L durations of treatment (DoT) and overall survival (OS). ResultsData from April 2015 to June 2022 were collected on 281 patients from nine UK centres. Median 1L DoT was 2.3 months for CPI–CPI therapy (n = 171) and 5.0 months for TKI–CPI therapy (n = 58). After 1L CPI–CPI or TKI–CPI therapy, median 2L DoT was 5.8 versus 4.2 months, respectively, for cabozantinib (n = 163), and 3.8 versus 2.4 months for other therapies (n = 118); median 2L OS was 15.2 and 15.3 months, respectively, for cabozantinib, and 14.6 and 24.2 months for other therapies. ConclusionDoT for 2L treatment was numerically better for cabozantinib than for other therapies, and after 1L CPI–CPI therapy than after 1L TKI–CPI therapy. Median OS was similar for 2L cabozantinib and other 2L therapies, and median OS for 2L cabozantinib was similar after both 1L therapy types. These results demonstrate the antitumour effect of 2L therapies, including cabozantinib, after 1L CPI-based combination treatment, regardless of whether 1L CPI–CPI or TKI–CPI therapy is used.

A phase 1/2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HB0025 monotherapy for patients (pts) with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

e14503 Background: HB0025 is a recombinant humanized bispecific molecule built on IgG1 that targets the human programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) (CD274) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF, VEGF-A, VEGF165). In phase Ia, HB0025 monotherapy showed encouraging anti-tumor activity and safety profile in solid tumor. Herein, we aimed to explore safety and efficacy of HB0025 in advanced renal cell carcinoma pts that failed standard treatments. Methods: This ongoing, open-label, multicenter, phase 1/2 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HB0025 monotherapy with 10mg/kg iv q2w for RCC pts. Response was evaluated by RECIST v.1.1 every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response-rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included safety (CTCAE v.5.0), disease control rate (DCR), and progression free survival (PFS). Results: As of Dec 25, 2023, 17 (16M/1F) pts were enrolled and all received treatment. Median age was 58 y and 53% pts had intermediate/poor IMDC risk.6 pts were on treatment at data cutoff date. All pts had stage IV disease. 14 (82%) pts were clear cell renal cell carcinoma and the maximum duration of treatment was 7 months. 10 (59%) pts received ≥2 lines of previous systemic therapies and median follow up was 5.1 months. Among total the 15 pts having imaging tumor assessment by RECIST v1.1, 2 achieved partial responses (PR) and 9 achieved stable disease (SD) in Best of Response.1 subject who had received 2-line treatment with multiple metastases (including lung, bones, liver and adrenal gland) had achieved PR since the first tumor assessment, target lesion decreased by up to 52.1% from baseline. 1 subject who had received 2-line treatment with lung and lymph node metastasis had achieved PR since the first tumor assessment, target lesion decreased by up to 40.3% from baseline. Both two patients, duration of treatment was over 6 months and still in PR status when discontinued treatment. The ORR was 13.3% (95%CI: 1.7-40.5) and DCR was 73.3% (95%CI: 44.9-92.2). Median PFS was not reached. For all enrolled pts, 17 pts (100%) experienced a treatment related adverse events (TRAE). The most common TRAEs were proteinuria (58.8%, 10/17), hypoalbuminemia 6/9 (35.3%, 6/17), hypercholesterolemia (35.3%, 6/17), hyperuricemia (29.4%, 5/17). TRAEs ≥ grade 3 occurred in 6 (35.5%) patients and no death occurred. TRAE leading to discontinuation occurred in 3 (17.7%) pts. Conclusions: HB0025 10mg/kg monotherapy showed an acceptable safety profile and promising anti-tumor activity in prior multiple treated RCC, which supports further studies to explore the safety and efficacy of HB0025 as a monotherapy or in combination with other anti-tumor agents. HB0025 20mg/kg monotherapy study are currently ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT06222125 .

A phase I/II study of talazoparib and axitinib in patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

4541 Background: Targeting the VEGF pathway is a backbone therapeutic for patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Tumor and tissue hypoxia may also lead to DNA repair suppression and PARPs are key regulators of DNA damage and genomic maintenance which interact with HIF proteins. Pairing a potent VEGFR TKI with a selective PARP inhibitor (PARPi) may lead to improved outcomes in ccRCC patients. Methods: This was a phase I/II, investigator-initiated, single-center, open-label study (NCT04337970) of talazoparib plus axitinib in previously treated ccRCC patients. In the phase Ib dose escalation, patients must have been previously treated with a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor with no maximum lines of prior therapy, and those in dose expansion were required to have prior treatment with a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and prior VEGFR TKI, with a maximum of 2 prior lines of therapy. Patients received escalating doses of talazoparib (0.5 mg, 0.75 mg and 1 mg daily) with axitinib (5 mg twice daily) in a 3+3 design, with primary endpoint of safety and tolerability. After establishing the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), a dose expansion cohort enrolled patients in a Simon two-stage design with a primary endpoint of objective response (ORR), and secondary endpoints including progression-free survival (PFS). Results: From 2020-2023, 23 ccRCC patients were enrolled and treated on study. In the dose escalation, 15 patients enrolled across all 3 dose levels and there were 2 observed DLTS (1 in dose levels 2 and 3). Both DLTs was due to a lack of minimum exposure to study drugs during cycle 1 due to treatment-related toxicities. The maximum tolerated dose and RP2D established was 1 mg talazoparib daily with axitinib 5 mg twice daily. In the phase II dose expansion portion, an additional 9 patients were enrolled to evaluate preliminary efficacy. In total, 13/14 patients treated at the RP2D discontinued therapy due to progressive disease. The objective response rate (ORR) was 7% (90% CI 0, 30), with 1 patient achieving a partial response and 12 patients achieving stable disease (86%). With a median follow-up of 13.2 months (R: 6.6 -29), the median PFS was 6.1 months (95% CI 3.5, 8.4) and median overall survival (OS) was 27 months (95% CI 12- NE). Across the study, 13 (56%) patients had at least one treatment-emergent AE of grade 3+, and 9 (39%) patients had at least one treatment-related AE of grade 3+. Most common grade 3+ AEs included diarrhea, nausea, and anemia. Conclusions: This is the first clinical study evaluating combination PARPi and VEGFR TKI in metastatic ccRCC patients. This study established the RP2D and MTD of combination talazoparib and axitinib and demonstrated a tolerable safety profile across all dose escalation cohorts. The study did not meet the pre-defined efficacy threshold for further enrollment per Simon stage two design. Exploratory efforts to evaluate this treatment approach with tissue biomarker data remain ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04337970 .

Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in Hispanic/Latino patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma at a single institution.

e13738 Background: The incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is increasing, with an expected 81,610 new cases and 14,390 deaths in 2024. While clinical characteristics in patients with RCC have been well described, studies focusing on minority patients, such as Hispanic and Latino (HL), are limited. The objectives of the current study are to analyze differences in clinical, pathological, and outcome characteristics between HL and non-Hispanic Latino (NHL) pts. with advanced RCC (aRCC) in South Florida. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and pathological data from pts. with aRCC treated at Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (SCCC) from 2010 to 2023. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic and baseline characteristics. HL vs. NHL groups were compared using chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables. Time-to-event outcomes including metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method, and two groups were compared using the log rank rest. Results: A total of 417 patients diagnosed with aRCC who received care at SCCC were analyzed. HLs comprised 45% while NHLs represented 55% of patients with aRCC. A higher proportion of HLs presented at an earlier age (&lt; 60y.o, 53% vs. 44%), were female (31% vs. 24%), and had a higher proportion of ISUP grade 4 tumors (47% vs. 34.8%). HLs had a significantly shorter metastasis-free survival (HR 1.48 [95% CI: 1.06-2.05]) compared to NHLs. There were no differences in the frequency of AEs from TKI, IO or IO-TKI based therapies between HLs and NHLs. HLs were less likely to achieve an objective response (CR/PR) to 1st-line therapy compared to NHLs (OR 0.54 (95% [CI: 0.31-0.94]), including HLs with non-ccRCC (OR 0.24 [95% CI: 0.07-0.81]). There was no significant correlation between ethnicity and overall survival in pts. treated with systemic therapy. HLs were less likely to achieve CR/PR to 1st-line therapy compared to NHLs (OR 0.54 [95% CI: 0.31-0.94, p=0.030]) in 217 pts. treated with 1st-line therapy, and in 55 with non-cc RCC (OR 0.24 [95% CI: 0.07-0.81, p=0.021]). There was no significant correlation between ethnicity and overall survival in pts. treated with systemic therapy. Conclusions: In our cohort, patients with aRCC presented at an earlier age and we had a higher proportion of females in HLs compared to NHLs. HLs had a higher risk of developing metastases after nephrectomy compared to NHLs and were less likely to achieve an objective response to 1st-line systemic therapy. Our results, suggesting a potentially more aggressive clinical course of aRCC in HLs in our patients, need further validation in a larger cohort. Future studies will incorporate analysis of molecular tumor characteristics, to further understand biological differences explaining outcomes observed in HL vs NHL populations with aRCC.

Biomarker analyses in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) from the phase 3 CLEAR trial.

Biomarker analyses in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) from the phase 3 CLEAR trial.