Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Research Articles

Health-related quality of life in patients with advanced well-differentiated pancreatic and extrapancreatic neuroendocrine tumors treated with surufatinib versus placebo: Results from two randomized, double-blind, phase III trials (SANET-p and SANET-ep)

AimTo investigate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients who had neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) from SANET trials. MethodsEligible patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive surufatinib or placebo. HRQoL questionnaires, including the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-G.I.NET21, were collected. The prespecified HRQoL outcome was the mean change of scores from baseline to the last available visit for each domain. Time until definitive deterioration (TUDD) was defined as the time from randomization to deterioration of ≥10 points from baseline in domain score, disease progression, or death. Results370 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to surufatinib (n = 242) or placebo (n = 128). No significant difference in mean scores change from baseline to the last available visit was observed for QLQ-C30 and QLQ- G.I.NET21 domains, with the exception of diarrhea. The mean score of diarrhea increased 11.7 points from baseline in the surufatinib arm and decreased 1.2 points in the placebo arm, and the between-group difference was 12.9 points. Compared with placebo, surufatinib treated patients had a significantly longer TUDD for dyspnea (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39–0.86; P = 0.0058) and a significantly shorter TUDD for diarrhea (HR 2.91; 95% CI, 1.66–5.10; P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in TUDD for the remaining domains of QLQ-C30 and G.I.NET-21. ConclusionsHRQoL was similar in patients treated with surufatinib and placebo except for diarrhea. The preservation of HRQoL supports surufatinib as a treatment option for NETs. Clinical trial informationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02589821, NCT02588170.

A rare case of malignant pancreatic non-functional neuroendocrine tumor presenting as huge abdominal lump

We present a case of an exceptionally large size non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) in a young female. The tumor occupied the whole abdomen and pelvis and was clinically masqueraded as an ovarian tumor. Imaging with contrast enhanced CT scan and magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen aided in preoperative diagnosis of origin of the tumor from the pancreas. Distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy and left hemicolectomy was done. Primary colocolic anastomosis was done for reconstruction. Postop course was uneventful, and patient was discharged with advice to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy. Surgical excision of large size locally advanced non-functional PNET should be done with curative intention/ to treat symptoms and improve patient survival

Efficacy and safety of 177Lu‑DOTATATE in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: data from the NETTER-R international, retrospective study

PurposeNETTER-R aimed to determine the efficacy, safety and tolerability of 177Lu-DOTATATE in patients with progressive, advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (panNETs) using retrospective real-world data from multiple sites.MethodsThis international study retrospectively included patients with panNETs treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), safety and tumour response.ResultsIn total, 110 patients with panNETs were studied; 65.5% received a cumulative dose of 177Lu-DOTATATE 29.6 GBq ± 10% (median: 7.4 GBq). In 62 patients with available RECIST v1.1 tumour response, the median PFS was 24.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.5–34.5), and the objective response rate was 40.3% (95% CI: 28.1–53.6); all responses were partial. With a median follow up of 24.5 months (range: 2.0–123.4 months) after the first cycle of 177Lu-DOTATATE, the median OS in the full analysis set (n = 110) was 41.4 months (95% CI: 28.6–50.2). PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.672; p = 0.0009) and OS (HR: 3.360; p < 0.0001) were longer in patients who received no chemotherapy prior to 177Lu-DOTATATE than those who did. No treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) led to treatment discontinuation. Grade 3 anaemia, lymphopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 0.9%, 5.4% and 0.9% of patients, respectively. No acute leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome was reported. Six patients (5.5%) had renal TEAEs. All renal grade ≥ 3 events were transient and did not lead to treatment modification.ConclusionsThese results reinforce the role of 177Lu-DOTATATE for the treatment of patients with advanced, somatostatin receptor-positive panNETs.

Orchestrating Treatment Modalities in Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors-Need for a Conductor.

Simple SummaryPancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) are a heterogeneous and challenging entity, and today’s guidelines offer a variety of treatment modalities, while surgery has a clear role for patients with resectable tumors and early stages, advanced, or metastatic pNET may benefit from treatments that were evaluated in randomized controlled studies during the last year. With this review, we aim to provide an updated view on treatment options for metastatic pNET.Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are a vast growing disease. Over 50% of these tumors are recognized at advanced stages with lymph node, liver, or distant metastasis. An ongoing controversy is the role of surgery in the metastatic setting as dedicated systemic treatments have emerged recently and shown benefits in randomized trials. Today, liver surgery is an option for advanced pNETs if the tumor has a favorable prognosis, reflected by a low to moderate proliferation index (G1 and G2). Surgery in this well-selected population may prolong progression-free and overall survival. Optimal selection of a treatment plan for an individual patient should be considered in a multidisciplinary tumor board. However, while current guidelines offer a variety of modalities, there is so far only a limited focus on the right timing. Available data is based on small case series or retrospective analyses. The focus of this review is to highlight the right time-point for surgery in the setting of the multimodal treatment of an advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor.

The Role of Primary Tumor Resection in Patients With Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors With Liver Metastases.

BackgroundLiver metastases (LMs) are common in advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) patients. Currently, the benefit of primary tumor resection (PTR) in the setting of PNET patients with liver metastases is still controversial in several guidelines.MethodsData were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database to evaluate this issue. The main index of interest in our study was overall survival time.ResultsInformation on 536 PNET patients with liver metastases from the SEER database was identified. A total of 214 patients (PTR group) received primary tumor resection, and more than half of them (132 patients) had synchronous LM resection. The other 322 PNET patients (non-PTR group) with liver metastases did not receive primary tumor resection. A significant survival benefit was gained from PTR when compared with non-PTR patients, both in OS (72.93 ± 2.7 vs. 36.80 ± 2.22 months) and 3- or 5-year survival rates (75.1% vs. 28.9% and 67.9% vs. 22.3%, respectively). No difference was found between PTR alone and PTR with synchronous LM resection. From univariate and multivariate analyses, younger age (<65 years) and good or moderate tumor differentiation may be more important when considering primary tumor resection. However, we found that all grades of tumor differentiation could result in a better overall survival time after primary tumor resection.ConclusionOur study suggested that primary tumor resection in pancreatic neuroendocrine patients with liver metastases could result in a longer survival time. Primary tumor resection with synchronous liver metastasis resection was not related to a better survival benefit. This treatment strategy may routinely be taken into consideration in these patients.

Position Statement on the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Response Evaluation to Systemic Therapies of Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors, With a Special Focus on Radioligand Therapy.

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to provide a guidance for the management of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in clinical practice.Material and MethodsNominal group and Delphi techniques were used. A steering committee of 8 experts reviewed the current management of NETs, identified controversies and gaps, critically analyzed the available evidence, and formulated several guiding statements for clinicians. Subsequently, a panel of 26 experts, was selected to test agreement with the statements through 2 Delphi rounds. Items were scored on a 4-point Likert scale from 1 = totally agree to 4 = totally disagree. The agreement was considered if ≥75% of answers pertained to Categories 1 and 2 (consensus with the agreement) or Categories 3 and 4 (consensus with the disagreement).ResultsOverall, 132 statements were proposed, which incorporated the following areas: (1) overarching principles; (2) progression and treatment response criteria; (3) advanced gastro-enteric NETs; (4) advanced pancreatic NETs; (5) advanced NETs in other locations; (6) re-treatment with radioligand therapy (RLT); (7) neoadjuvant therapy. After 2 Delphi rounds, only 4 statements lacked a clear consensus. RLT was not only recommended in the sequencing of different NETs but also as neoadjuvant treatment, while several indications for retreatment with RLT were also established.ConclusionThis document sought to pull together the experts’ attitudes when dealing with different clinical scenarios of patients suffering from NETs, with RLT having a specific role where evidence-based data are limited.

Is Pancreatectomy with Vascular Resection and Reconstruction for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Safe?

Introduction: While pancreatectomy with vascular resection and reconstruction (VR) is commonly performed for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma, little is known regarding outcomes for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs). Methods: Non-parenchyma-sparing pancreatectomies for pNETs at Mayo Clinic 2000-2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for selection bias. Differences between groups were compared with chi-square, Fisher‘s exact, and Mann-Whitney tests and survival assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: Of 813 eligible patients, 36 (4.4%) required VR: 22 underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy and 14 distal pancreatectomy. 34 patients had venous resection, one arterial, and one both. Patients requiring VR had larger tumors (median 55 vs. 25 mm, p<0.001), higher grade (84.6% vs. 58.5% grade 2-3, p=0.008), and higher stage (44.4% vs. 19.2% stage 4, p<0.001). After matching, the VR group had longer operative times (median 410 vs. 331 minutes, p<0.001), greater blood loss (47.2% vs. 25.0% >1000 ml, p=0.035), and higher transfusion rates (63.9% vs. 29.2%, p=0.001). Major complications (Clavien-Dindo >/=3) occurred in 41.7% after VR and 25.0% after standard resection (p=0.121). 90-day mortality was 2.8% after VR and 4.2% after standard resection (p>0.999). Over the entire period, overall (p=0.172) and progression-free (p=0.105) survival were not significantly different. On landmark analysis, VR patients had worse overall survival starting at 60 months (p=0.043) and worse progression-free survival starting at 18 months (p=0.044). Conclusion: For patients with locally advanced pNETs, pancreatectomy with VR can be performed in selected patients at high-volume centers with acceptable perioperative morbidity and short- and long-term survival.

Plasma Hemoglobin and Red Blood Cell Mass Levels as Dynamic Prognostic Markers for Progression and Survival in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

There are scarce data on readily available markers enabling immediate risk stratification and personalized management in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. This study explores the association of red blood cells-related parameters as prognostic markers in patients harboring pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Retrospective analysis of a tertiary medical center database, acquiring data of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors including demographics, tumor-related parameters and consecutive imaging results, vital status at last follow-up, and red blood cells parameters at baseline, last follow-up, and dynamics (last/baseline ratio). Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed. Sixty-seven patients were identified (mean age at diagnosis of 63±11 years, 56.7% males). Patients with disease progression had lower hemoglobin, red blood cells mass values and hematocrit at the last evaluation (p<0.001 for all comparisons), with red blood cells mass level<3.9 m/μl and a 6% and 9% relative reduction in hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, respectively, associated with an increased risk for disease progression. Similarly, patients deceased during the study period had lower hemoglobin, red blood cells mass values and hematocrit (p<0.03 for all) than those alive, at last follow-up. Eleven percent reduction in hemoglobin level was noted indicating a higher mortality risk (p=0.04). Negative hemoglobin and hematocrit dynamics were independently associated with increased risk for disease progression (p=0.03 and 0.049, respectively). In conclusion, decrease in red blood cells mass, hemoglobin and/or hematocrit levels are all associated with poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. We suggest utilizing these parameters as complementary follow-up prognostic markers to radiologic imaging in this patients population.

Sunitinib-Induced Hypothyroidism and Survival in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

AbstractSunitinib has been approved for the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, renal-cell carcinoma, and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. The elevation of thyroid-stimulating hormone serum levels is a common side effect. Studies suggest a correlation between sunitinib-induced hypothyroidism and treatment outcome in patients with renal-cell carcinoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. This study assessed whether sunitinib-induced hypothyroidism is a predictive marker of the objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor patients. Twenty-nine patients treated with sunitinib for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors were included. The incidence of sunitinib-induced hypothyroidism was 33%. The median progression-free survival of patients who developed hypothyroidism was 16 months (95% confidence interval: 6.2–25.8 months) as compared with six months among euthyroid patients (95% confidence interval: 0.1–12.2 months) (p=0.02). The median overall survival was 77 months (95% confidence interval: 31.4–122.6 months) in hypothyroid patients but 12 months (95% confidence interval: 5.9–18.1 months) in subjects with euthyroidism (p=0.001). The median overall survival from the time of initial diagnosis ranged from 247 months in patients with hypothyroidism to 65 months in euthyroid subjects (p=0.015). Elevated thyroid-stimulating hormone levels are a prognostic biomarker of improved outcomes of sunitinib therapy in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor patients.

Ramucirumab in combination with dacarbazine in patients with progressive well-differentiated metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (RamuNET): study protocol for a multicenter single-arm trial

BackgroundCytotoxic chemotherapy combinations and targeted agents represent established treatment concepts in advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). However, response rates, side effects and outcome data strongly vary among these therapeutic approaches. Head-to-head comparisons between chemo- and molecular therapies are missing and secondary resistances frequently occur. The RamuNET trial aims to identify the effectiveness of dual treatment with DTIC and ramucirumab in progressive advanced PNET patients.MethodsThe RamuNET study is an investigator-initiated multicenter prospective single-arm trial to evaluate the efficacy of ramucirumab in combination with dacarbazine (DTIC) over a period of at least 6 months. Patients with progressive well-differentiated and metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are eligible. The study aims to include 45 patients over a period of 24 months with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. The primary endpoint is disease control after 6 months. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, biochemical response, overall survival, quality of life and toxicity. Based on the hypothesis that 80% of the patients can achieve a disease control after 6 months, the sample size calculation follows an exact binomial single-stage design. H0: p < =p0 = 60% versus H1: p > =p1 = 80%, alpha = 0.05, beta = 0.1.DiscussionThis study investigates a new therapeutic approach using the combination of cytotoxic and targeted antiangiogenic therapy in advanced PNET. If positive, this trial will be the basis for a randomized two-arm study to investigate the combination of ramucirumab and DTIC against other established therapies in PNET.Trial registrationEudraCT: 2017–001207-68. Date of registration: 2018.01.03.

Streptozocin/5-fluorouracil chemotherapy of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours in the era of targeted therapy

PurposeThe role of streptozocin-based chemotherapy (STZ CTx) in advanced, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNET) and the best sequence of treatments in advanced PanNET are unclear. We examined the outcomes after STZ CTx in patients who had been selected according to the current therapeutic guidelines.MethodsData from 50 PanNET patients consecutively treated with STZ CTx between 2010 and 2018 were analysed. The endpoints of the study were the objective-response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).ResultsSTZ CTx was the first-line treatment in 54% of patients. The PanNET grades were as follows: 6% G1, 88% G2, and 6% well-differentiated G3. The ORR was 38%. Stable disease was the best response in 38% of patients and 24% showed progressive disease. Treatment was discontinued because of toxicity in one patient. Median PFS and OS were 12 (95% confidence interval (CI), 8.5–15.5) and 38 months (95% CI, 20.4–55.6), respectively. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the median OS was 89 months (95% CI, 34.9–143.1) for STZ CTx as first-line therapy compared with 22 months (95% CI, 19.3–24.7; p = 0.001, log-rank test) for subsequent lines. Bone metastases negatively impacted survival (HR, 2.71, p = 0.009, univariate analysis, HR, 2.64, p = 0.015, multivariate analysis, and Cox regression).ConclusionsIn patients selected according to current guidelines, PFS, and OS after STZ CTx were lower than previously reported, whereas ORR was unchanged. First-line treatment was positively associated with OS and the presence of bone metastases was negatively associated with OS. Pre-treatment with targeted or peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy did not alter ORR, PFS, or OS.

PAK4-NAMPT Dual Inhibition Sensitizes Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors to Everolimus.

Metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) remain an unmet clinical problem. Chronologic treatment in PNETs includes observation (watchful protocol), surgery, targeted therapy, and chemotherapy. However, increasing evidence illustrates that the outcomes of targeted therapeutic options for the treatment of advanced PNETs show minimal response. The FDA-approved mTOR inhibitor everolimus does not shrink these tumors. It only delays disease progression in a subset of patients, while a significant fraction acquires resistance and shows disease progression. Thus, there is a need for more effective targeted approaches to sensitize PNETs to everolimus for better treatment outcomes. Previously, we showed that mTOR regulator p21 activated kinase 4 (PAK4) and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide biosynthesis enzyme nicotinamide phosphoribosyl transferase (NAMPT) were aberrantly expressed in PNET tissue and promoted everolimus resistance. In this report, we demonstrate that PAK4-NAMPT dual inhibitor KPT-9274 can synergize with everolimus (growth inhibition, colony suppression, and glucose uptake assays). KPT-9274-everolimus disrupted spheroid formation in multiple PNET models. Molecular analysis showed alteration of mTORC2 through downregulation of RICTOR as a mechanism supporting synergy with everolimus in vitro KPT-9274 suppressed β-catenin activity via inhibition of PAK4, highlighting the cross-talk between Rho GTPases and Wnt signaling in PNETs. KPT-9274, given at 150 mg/kg in combination with sub-MTD everolimus (2.5 mg/kg), significantly suppressed two PNET-derived xenografts. These studies bring forward a well-grounded strategy for advanced PNETs that fail to respond to single-agent everolimus.

Subgroup analysis by Ki-67 and baseline CgA of the randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 study of surufatinib in advanced well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (SANET-p).

4111 Background: In the phase 3 SANET-p trial (NCT02589821), surufatinib significantly increased progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo in patients with progressive, well-differentiated (grade 1 or 2), advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Here we report the relationship of Ki-67 and baseline Chromogranin A (CgA) on efficacy outcomes. Methods: A total of 172 patients with advanced pancreatic NETs were randomized to surufatinib or placebo in a 2:1 ratio. Investigator-assessed PFS and objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 were used for the analysis. The post-hoc subgroup analyses were performed on Ki-67 subcategory: &lt; 5% (n = 40 vs 21), 5-10% (n = 57 vs 31), &gt; 10% (n = 16 vs 7), and baseline CgA subcategory: ≤ 2 times of upper limit of normal (ULN) (n = 59 vs 31), &gt; 2 × ULN (n = 44 vs 24). Results: In the intent-to-treat population, surufatinib was superior to placebo, median PFS (mPFS) of 10.9 vs 3.7 months (mo) ( p = 0.0011), with a stratified hazard ratio (HR) of 0.491 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.319, 0.755). mPFS was statistically significantly longer in the surufatinib arm versus that in the placebo arm in subgroups of Ki-67 5-10% (11.0 vs 3.7 mo, HR = 0.33, p= 0.0002), Ki-67 &gt; 10% (11.1 vs 2.8 mo, HR = 0.04, p = 0.0003) and CgA &gt; 2 × ULN (11.0 vs 3.7 mo, HR = 0.36, p = 0.0036). There was numerical PFS improvement with surufatinib compared to placebo in subgroup of Ki-67 &lt; 5% (9.3 vs 5.6 mo, HR = 0.91, p = 0.8015) and CgA ≤ 2 × ULN (9.4 vs 3.7 mo, HR = 0.61, p = 0.0809). ORRs in the subgroups of Ki-67 &lt; 5%, 5-10%, and &gt; 10% with surufatinib were 15.8%, 24.0% and 12.5% respectively. There was only one partial response in the placebo arm (with Ki-67 &lt; 5%). ORRs in the subgroups of CgA ≤ 2 × ULN and &gt; 2 × ULN with surufatinib were 18.9% and 21.4%, while also only one partial response in the placebo arm with CgA ≤ 2 × ULN. Conclusions: Surufatinib showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS compared to placebo in patients with advanced, progressive, well-differentiated pancreatic NETs. From this exploratory analysis, surufatinib demonstrated benefit irrespective of Ki-67 expression levels or baseline CgA. Clinical trial information: NCT02589821.

Efficacy and safety of 177Lu-DOTATATE in patients (pts) with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs): Data from the NETTER-R international, retrospective registry.

4116 Background: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE is indicated in somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positive gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. The NETTER-R registry builds upon the existing evidence for pts with advanced pNETs, who have limited therapeutic options. Methods: NETTER-R is a retrospective registry of pts with unresectable or metastatic, well-differentiated, SSTR-positive, progressive pNETs treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE in the UK, France and Spain. Pts who received ≥1 administration of 177Lu-DOTATATE were included. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) based on RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), safety and tumour response. Results: A total of 110 pts with pNETs were identified. Median age was 58.0 years (range 28–89) and 52.7% were male. At baseline, 96.4% of pts had progressive disease. The Ki-67 index was ≤2% in 23.6%, 3–20% in 66.4% and &gt;20% in 2.7% of pts (7.3% missing). Metastases were present in the liver in 95.5% and bone in 29.1% of pts. Nearly all pts (90.9%) had received at least one prior anticancer therapy (somatostatin analogues: 70.0%, chemotherapy: 61.8%, protein kinase inhibitors: 38.2%). The majority of pts (70.0%) received all four scheduled cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE. The cumulative activity was 26.6–32.6 GBq in 65.5% of pts (&lt;26.6 GBq: 31.8%, ≥32.6 GBq: 2.7%). 12 pts were re-treated after disease progression and received 1–4 additional cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE. By RECIST v1.1, evaluable in 62 pts, median PFS was 24.8 months (95% CI 17.5–34.5) and objective response rate was 40.3% (95% CI 28.1–53.6); all responses were partial. The response rate, including radiological, clinical, metabolic and biomarker assessments, evaluable in 100 pts, was 54.0% (95% CI 43.7–64.0), including 2 pts with complete response. Over a median follow-up of 24.5 months (range 2.0–123.4), median OS in 110 pts was 41.4 months (95% CI 28.6–50.2). 71.8% (n=79/110) of pts had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). The most frequent were nausea (28.2%) and fatigue (22.7%), predominantly grade 1/2 in severity. No TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation. Grade 3 anaemia and lymphopenia occurred in 1 (0.9%) and 4 (3.6%) pts, respectively. No grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia or neutropenia were reported. Renal TEAEs occurred in 6 pts (5.5%; grade 1: n=1, grade 2: n=2, grade 3: n=3). Grade 3 renal events were transient (≤24 days) and did not lead to treatment modification. No acute leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome were reported within the follow-up. Conclusions: In a real-world population of pts with advanced pNETs, 177Lu-DOTATATE was well tolerated with a safety profile consistent with the NETTER-1 trial. With limited follow-up, the OS and PFS compared favourably with cohorts of progressive pNET patients treated with other systemic agents.

Relationship between metabolic toxicity and efficacy of everolimus in patients with neuroendocrine tumors: A pooled analysis from the randomized, phase 3 RADIANT-3 and RADIANT-4 trials.

Hyperglycemia and hypercholesterolemia are class effects of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors such as everolimus. This post hoc pooled analysis assessed the potential impact of these events on the efficacy of everolimus. Patients with advanced, low- or intermediate-grade pancreatic, gastrointestinal, or lung neuroendocrine tumors received either oral everolimus at 10 mg/d or a placebo in the RAD001 in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors 3 (RADIANT-3) and RAD001 in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors 4 (RADIANT-4) trials. A landmark progression-free survival (PFS) analysis by central review was performed for patients treated for at least 16 weeks (n = 308) and according to the occurrence of any-grade adverse events (AEs) within this treatment period. The overall PFS with everolimus from the pooled analysis was 11.4 months (95% confidence interval, 11.01-13.93 months), which was consistent with the findings of RADIANT-3 and RADIANT-4. Overall, 19.1% and 9.8% of patients in RADIANT-3 and 11.9% and 6.4% of patients in RADIANT-4 developed any-grade hyperglycemia and hypercholesterolemia, respectively (regardless of the study drug). The duration of everolimus exposure was longer in patients who developed these AEs versus patients without these AEs. Overall, 308 patients were exposed to treatment for at least 16 weeks (hyperglycemia, 39 of 269 patients; hypercholesterolemia, 20 of 288 patients). No association was observed between the development of these AEs and PFS (18.8 and 14.1 months with and without hyperglycemia, respectively, and 14.1 and 14.8 months with and without hypercholesterolemia, respectively). Although limitations apply because of the small number of AEs observed, there was no significant impact of these AEs on PFS; this suggests similar efficacy in the presence or absence of these events.

Impact of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor on Mortality in Patients With von Hippel-Lindau Disease

ObjectiveThe main causes for morbidity and mortality in von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease are central nervous system hemangioblastoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma, but the effect of VHL-related pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) on patient outcome is unclear. We assessed the impact of PNET diagnosis in patients with VHL on all-cause mortality (ACM) risk. MethodsWe used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Of 16 344 patients, 170 had VHL based on clinical diagnostic criteria, and 510 patients had PNET (91 VHL-related and 419 sporadic). ResultsSurvival analysis demonstrated a lower ACM among patients with VHL-related PNET compared to patients with sporadic PNET (log-rank test, P = .011). Among patients with VHL, ACM risk was higher with vs without PNET (P = .029). The subgroup analysis revealed a higher ACM risk with metastatic PNET (sporadic P = .0031 and VHL-related P = .08) and a similar trend for PNET diameter ≥3 cm (P = .06 and P = 0.1 in sporadic and VHL-related PNET, respectively). In a multivariable analysis of patients with VHL, diagnosis with PNET by itself was associated with a trend of lower risk for ACM, while presence of metastatic PNET was independently associated with increased ACM risk. ConclusionDiagnosis with PNET is not associated with a higher ACM risk in VHL by itself. The independent association of advanced PNET stage with higher mortality risk emphasizes the importance of active surveillance for detecting high-risk PNET at an early stage to allow timely intervention.

Current treatments and future potential of surufatinib in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare, heterogeneous, often indolent tumors that predominantly originate in the lungs and gastrointestinal tract. An understanding of the biology and tumor microenvironment of NETs has led to the development of molecularly targeted treatment options including somatostatin analogs, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Although increases in progression-free survival have been demonstrated, most currently approved NET therapies are limited by the development of tumor resistance. Surufatinib (HMPL-012, previously known as sulfatinib) is a new, oral, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that potently inhibits vascular endothelial growth-factor receptor 1–3, fibroblast growth-factor receptor 1, and colony-stimulating-factor-1 receptor. This unique combination of molecular activities inhibits tumor angiogenesis, regulates tumor-immune evasion, and may decrease tumor resistance. Surufatinib demonstrated statistically significant, clinically meaningful antitumor activity, including tumor shrinkage, in two phase III studies recently completed in China in advanced pancreatic NETs and advanced extrapancreatic NETs. The safety profile of surufatinib in neuroendocrine tumors studies was consistent with previous surufatinib clinical studies. In an ongoing study in United States (US) patients with NETs of pancreatic origin and NETs of extrapancreatic origin previously treated with everolimus or sunitinib, surufatinib has also demonstrated promising efficacy. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetic and safety profile of surufatinib in US patients is similar to data collected in studies done in China. These positive phase III results support the efficacy of surufatinib in patients with advanced, progressive, well-differentiated NETs regardless of tumor origin.

Usefulness of an immunohistochemical score in advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors treated with CAPTEM or everolimus

BackgroundPancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are rare neoplasms for which few predictive and/or prognostic biomarkers have been validated. Our previous work suggested the potential of the combined expression of N-myc downstream-regulated gen-1 (NDRG-1), O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) and Pleckstrin homology-like domain family A member 3 (PHLDA-3) as prognostic factors for relapse and survival. MethodsIn this new multicenter study we evaluated immunohistochemistry expression in 76 patients with advanced PanNET who were treated with capecitabine-temozolomide or everolimus. Based on the immunohistochemistry panel, an immunohistochemistry prognostic score (IPS) was developed. ResultsIn patients treated with capecitabine and temozolomide, low IPS was an independent prognostic factor for progression-free-survival and overall-survival. Similar findings were observed with highest IPS for overall-survival in patients treated with everolimus. ConclusionFrom our knowledge, it is the first time that a simple IPS could be useful to predict outcome for patients with metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors treated with everolimus or capecitabine and temozolomide.

Evaluation of Outcomes Following Surgery for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Although outcome of surgical resection of liver metastases from pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) has been extensively studied, little is known about surgery for locally advanced PNETs; it was listed recently by the European neuroendocrine tumor society as a major unmet need. To evaluate the outcome of patients who underwent surgery for locally aggressive PNETs. This retrospective single-center case series reviewed consecutive patients who underwent resection of T3/T4 PNETs at a single academic institution. Data collection occurred from 2003 to 2018. Data analysis was performed in August 2019. Disease-free survival (primary outcome) and overall mortality (secondary outcome) were assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Recurrence risk (secondary outcome, defined as identification of tumor recurrence on imaging) was assessed with Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for covariates. In this case series, 99 patients with locally advanced nondistant metastatic PNET (56 men [57%]) with a mean (SEM) age of 57.0 (1.4) years and a mean (SEM) follow-up of 5.3 (0.1) years underwent surgically aggressive resections. Of those, 4 patients (4%) underwent preoperative neoadjuvant treatment (including peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and chemotherapy); 18 patients (18%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, 68 patients (69%) had distal or subtotal pancreatic resection, 10 patients (10%) had total resection, and 3 patients (3%) had other pancreatic procedures. Additional organ resection was required in 86 patients (87%): spleen (71 patients [71%]), major blood vessel (17 patients [17%]), bowel (2 patients [2%]), stomach (4 patients [4%]), and kidney (2 patients [2%]). Five-year disease-free survival was 61% (61 patients) and 5-year overall survival was 91% (91 patients). Of those living, 75 patients (76%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of less than or equal to 1 at last followup. Lymph node involvement (HR, 7.66; 95% CI, 2.78-21.12; P < .001), additional organ resected (HR, 6.15; 95% CI, 1.61-23.55; P = .008), and male sex (HR, 3.77; 95% CI, 1.68-8.97; P = .003) were associated with increased risk of recurrence. Functional tumors had a lower risk of recurrence (HR, 0.23; CI, 0.06-0.89; P = .03). Required resection of blood vessels was not associated with a significant increase recurrence risk. In this case series, positive lymph node involvement and resection of organs with tumor involvement were associated with an increased recurrence risk. These subgroups may require adjuvant systemic treatment. These findings suggest that patients with locally advanced PNETs who undergo surgical resection have excellent disease-free and overall survival.

Surufatinib in advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (SANET-p): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study

Surufatinib showed superior efficacy in extrapancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) in the phase 3 SANET-ep study. In SANET-p, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of surufatinib in patients with advanced pancreatic NETs. SANET-p was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study, done in 21 hospitals across China. Eligible patients were adults (aged 18 years or older) with progressive, advanced, well differentiated pancreatic NETs, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and progression on up to two kinds of previous systemic regimens for advanced disease. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) via an interactive web response system to receive 300 mg of surufatinib or placebo, taken orally once per day in consecutive 4-week treatment cycles until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, poor compliance, use of other antitumour medication, pregnancy, loss to follow-up, or if the investigator deemed discontinuation in the patient's best interest. Randomisation was done centrally using stratified block randomisation (block size three), stratified by pathological grade, previous systemic antitumour treatment, and ECOG performance status score. Patients, investigators, research staff, and the sponsor study team were masked to treatment allocation. Crossover to surufatinib was permitted for patients in the placebo group with disease progression. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population, which included all patients in randomisation. A pre-planned interim analysis was done at 70% of the predicted progression-free survival events. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02589821. Between Feb 18, 2016, and Nov 11, 2019, of 264 patients who were screened, 172 (65%) patients were randomly assigned to receive surufatinib (n=113) or placebo (n=59). The median follow-up was 19·3 months (95% CI 9·3-19·4) in the surufatinib group and 11·1 months (5·7-35·9) in the placebo group. The median investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 10·9 months (7·5-13·8) for surufatinib versus 3·7 months (2·8-5·6) for placebo (hazard ratio 0·49, 95% CI 0·32-0·76; p=0·0011). The trial met the early stopping criteria at the interim analysis and was terminated on recommendation from the independent data monitoring committee. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (43 [38%] of 113 with surufatinib vs four [7%] of 59 with placebo), proteinuria (11 [10%] vs one [2%]), and hypertriglyceridaemia (eight [7%] vs none). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 25 (22%) patients in the surufatinib group and four (7%) patients in the placebo group. There were three on-treatment deaths in the surufatinib group, including two deaths due to adverse events (gastrointestinal haemorrhage [possibly treatment-related] and cerebral haemorrhage [unlikely to be treatment-related]), and one death attributed to disease progression. One on-treatment death in the placebo group was attributed to disease progression. Surufatinib significantly improves progression-free survival and has an acceptable safety profile in patients with progressive, advanced pancreatic NETs, and could be a potential treatment option in this patient population. Hutchison MediPharma.