Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Research Articles

Is clinical target volume necessary for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with 4D-CT intensity-modulated radiation therapy

BackgroundA dosimetric evaluation is still lacking in terms of clinical target volume (CTV) omission in stage III patients treated with 4D-CT Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT).Methods49 stage III NSCLC patients received 4D-CT IMRT were reviewed. Target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) were re-delineated. Four IMRT plans were conducted retrospectively to deliver different prescribed dose (74 Gy–60 Gy), and with or without CTV implementation. Dose and volume histogram (DVH) parameters were collected and compared.ResultsIn the PTV-g 60 Gy plan (PTV-g refers to the PTV generated from the internal gross tumor volume), only 5 of 49 patients had the isodose ≥ 50 Gy line covering at least 95% of the PTV-c (PTV-c refers to the PTV generated from the internal CTV) volume. When the prescribed dose was elevated to 74 Gy to the PTV-g, 33 of 49 patients could have the isodose ≥ 50 Gy line covering at least 95% of the PTV-c volume. In terms of OARs protection, the SIB-IMRT plan showed the lowest value of V5, V20, and mean dose of lung, had the lowest V55 of esophagus, and the lowest estimated radiation doses to immune cells (EDIC). The V20, V30, and mean dose of heart was lower in the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) IMRT (SIB-IMRT) plan than that of the PTV-c 60 Gy plan.ConclusionsCTV omission was not suitable for stage III patients when the prescribed dose to PTV-g was 60 Gy in the era of 4D-CT IMRT. CTV omission plus high dose to PTV-g (74 Gy for example) warranted further exploration. The SIB-IMRT plan had the best protection to normal tissue including lymphocytes, and might be the optimal choice.

Successful rapid improvement of acute respiratory distress syndrome induced by EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer with almonertinib: a case report

BackgroundAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition frequently encountered in critically ill patients, including those with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Almonertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has shown promise as a first-line treatment for NSCLC with classical EGFR mutations. However, its efficacy in NSCLC patients suffering from ARDS has not been well-documented.Case PresentationWe report the case of a 63-year-old Chinese Han female with severe NSCLC complicated by ARDS. Upon hospital admission, the patient exhibited progressive dyspnea and required intubation to maintain oxygenation. Pathological analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid sediment confirmed lung adenocarcinoma, and genetic testing of blood identified an EGFR E19 mutation. The patient was treated with almonertinib, resulting in significant clinical improvement and successful extubation after nine days. Radiographic imaging showed substantial reduction in pulmonary lesions, highlighting the efficacy of almonertinib.ConclusionThis case represents the first documented successful treatment of ARDS induced by EGFR E19 mutated NSCLC using almonertinib. The favorable clinical response observed in this critically ill patient suggests that almonertinib may be a viable therapeutic option for managing severe complications in NSCLC. Further research is necessary to corroborate these findings and optimize dosage and toxicity management strategies for broader clinical application.

Clinical utility of ctDNA by amplicon based next generation sequencing in first line non small cell lung cancer patients.

The assessment of ctDNA has emerged as a minimally invasive avenue for molecular diagnosis and real-time tracking of tumor progression in NSCLC. However, the evaluation of ctDNA by amplicon-based NGS has been not endorsed by all the healthcare systems and remains to be fully integrated into clinical routine practice. To compare tissue single-gene with plasma multiplexed testing, we retrospectively evaluated 120 plasma samples from 12 consecutive patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC who were part of a prospective study enrolling treatment-naïve patients and in which tissue samples were evaluated using a single-gene testing approach. While the plasma ctDNA detection of EGFR and BRAF mutations had an acceptable level of concordance with the archival tissue (85%), discordance was seen in all the patients in whom ALK alterations were only detected in tissue samples. Among six responders and six non-responders, early ctDNA mutant allelic frequency (MAF) reduction seemed to predict radiologic responses and longer survival, whereas increasing MAF values with the emergence of co-mutations like BRAFV600E, KRASG12V or TP53M237I seemed to be an early indicator of molecular and radiologic progression. This report using an amplicon-based NGS assay on ctDNA underscores the real-life need for plasma and tissue genotyping as complementary tools in the diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making process.

Potent covalent irreversible inhibitor of KRAS G12C IBI351 in patients with advanced solid tumors: First-in-human phase I study

BackgroundIBI351 is an irreversible and covalent inhibitor of KRAS G12C. Despite FDA approval of two KRAS G12C inhibitors, there are still significant unmet clinical needs in Chinese patients and ongoing concerns about the optimal dosage. Herein, we presented the phase Ia/Ib study of IBI351 monotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors harboring KRAS G12C mutation. MethodsIn phase Ia dose escalation, IBI351 at 250/450/700/900 mg once daily and 450/600/750 mg twice daily (BID) were evaluated. Potentially efficacious doses and optimal recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) were further evaluated in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in phase Ia dose expansion and phase Ib. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and investigator-assessed tumor response were evaluated. ResultsAs of June 13, 2023, 176 patients were enrolled. IBI351 was well tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicity reported across all evaluated doses. The RP2D was determined as 600 mg BID by considering safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics. A total of 168 patients (95.5 %) had at least one treatment-related adverse event (TRAE), and 64 patients (36.4 %) had grade 3 or higher TRAEs, most commonly gamma-glutamyl transferase increased (10.2 %) and anemia (6.8 %). For patients with NSCLC, the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was 45.5 % across all doses. At 600 mg BID, the confirmed ORR was 46.8 % and median progression-free survival was 9.6 months with a median follow-up of 6.9 months. ConclusionsIBI351 was well tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumors and showed promising antitumor activity in advanced NSCLC patients with KRAS G12C mutation.

HER3 is widely expressed across diverse subtypes of NSCLC in a retrospective analysis of archived tissue samples.

Aim: This noninterventional study (NCT05769764) aimed to characterize human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3) expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by patient, clinical or tumor characteristics.Methods: HER3 immunohistochemistry was performed in archival tissue samples from patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Samples were scored for membrane percent positivity and intensity. Membrane H-scores were calculated.Results: Of 203 evaluable samples, HER3 expression was observed in 98.5%, including all histologies, genomic subtypes and regardless of prior systemic anticancer treatments. The median H-score was 140, and 70.4% had a HER3 intensity of 3+.Conclusion: HER3 is widely expressed in NSCLC, indicating that HER3-directed therapy may be broadly applicable across diverse subtypes of NSCLC.

The association of azole antifungals with overall survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Preclinical data suggest antifungal azole derivatives have antitumor efficacy that may modulate response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We aimed to evaluate the association of azole drugs with overall survival (OS) in a population of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with ICI within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). In this retrospective study, the VA Corporate Data Warehouse was queried for patients diagnosed with NSCLC and treated with ICI from 2010 to 2018. Concomitant oral azole use was defined as dispensation by a VA pharmacy within 90 days of the first ICI infusion. Patients who received azole after 30 days were excluded from the analysis to mitigate immortal time bias. OS was measured from the start of ICI. Cox regression and propensity score matching were used to adjust for confounders. We identified 3413 patients with NSCLC receiving ICI; 324 (9.5%) were exposed to concomitant azoles. As a group, azole use was not associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.84-1.09; P = .51). After stratification by azole type, clotrimazole had an association with better OS on univariable (HR = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59-0.96; P = .024) and multivariable analysis (HR = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56-0.91; P = .007). Propensity score matching of patients who received clotrimazole vs no azole yielded 101 patients per matched cohort. Clotrimazole was associated with improved OS, although this did not meet the threshold for statistical significance (HR = 0.74; 0.54-1.01; P = .058). This observational study demonstrated an association between clotrimazole and OS among patients with advanced NSCLC receiving ICI. These findings build upon preclinical evidence and support further investigation into the potential for clotrimazole as a repurposed FDA drug to improve cancer outcomes.

Safety and Efficacy of Salvage Surgery after Treatment With Immune-Checkpoint Adjuvant Inhibitors for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicentric Study.

In advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can achieve significant clinical responses. This raises the question of whether to consider salvage surgery as a curative treatment option. Few case series reported encouraging results in terms of pathological response. However, intraoperative risk and postoperative morbidity have been highlighted. This study aims to assess the safety and feasibility of surgery after ICIs administration and to evaluate its effectiveness on the final pathological examination. We retrospectively identified stages III-IVA NSCLC consecutive patients who underwent surgery with radical intent after ICIs at three National Centers (2016-2022). Before treatment, all patients were considered unresectable by a multidisciplinary discussion. After surgery, pathological response was evaluated according to the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) recommendation. Thirty-one patients were included; pretreatment clinical stage was: IIIA in 4 patients (10%), IIIB in 13 (42%), IIIC in 3 (13%), and IVA in 11 (35%). Median treatment duration was four cycles. Only anatomical resections were performed, with lobectomy that represent the main type of resection (22 patients, 74%). A minimally invasive approach was performed in 10 patients (32%), with a conversion rate of 0%. Postoperative complications were observed in eight patients (25%). Complete pathologic response (CPR) and major pathologic response (MPR) were 48% and 16%, respectively. Two and 3-years survival were 88%. Based on our experience, salvage surgery of advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs confirm his feasibility and safety in responder patients. Moreover, it is associated with low morbidity, high CPR rate, and satisfying medium-term survival.

Learning about and living with toxicity: a qualitative study of patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors for melanoma or lung cancer and their caregivers.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized treatment for melanoma and lung cancer and are in widespread use. This study aims to describe how patients and caregivers learn about ICI toxicities and their perceptions and experiences of toxicity. We conducted a qualitative study of 42 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; n = 16) or melanoma (n = 26) who were initiating or discontinuing an ICI and their caregivers (n = 9). We conducted in-depth interviews to explore patients' and caregivers' experiences learning about and living with ICI side effects. We audio-recorded the first oncology visit after enrollment. We used a framework approach to code interview and visit transcripts and synthesized codes into themes. The median age of patients was 67; 68% were male. Themes of participant interviews and clinician-patient dialogue included: (i) Patients initiating an ICI received extensive information about side effects, which some patients found overwhelming or scary and difficult to absorb; (ii) patients who were deterred by fear of toxicity ultimately proceeded with treatment because of oncologist encouragement or the sense of no alternative; (iii) participants found hope in the association between toxicity and ICI efficacy; (iv) caregivers helped patients navigate the deluge of information and uncertainty related to ICIs. Participants suggested ways to improve ICI side effect education, such as incorporating patient stories. Patients perceived that ICI toxicity counseling was overwhelming yet were encouraged by oncologists' reassurance that serious side effects were manageable and by the framing of toxicity as a sign of efficacy. We identified opportunities to improve communication of ICI risks and benefits.

Risk Stratification by Combination of Heart and Lung Dose in Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer after Radiotherapy

Background/Objectives: Despite advancements in treatment for patients with unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC), overall survival (OS) remains poor. The specific effects of varying heart and lung doses on OS in LA-NSCLC patients have not been thoroughly investigated, especially their combined impact on survival. This study aimed to examine the impact on OS of both individual and combined heart and lung doses in patients with LA-NSCLC treated with radiotherapy over a three-year follow-up period. Methods: A total of 120 patients who received definitive radiotherapy for LA-NSCLC (stage III, 92.5%) from January 2015 to January 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The endpoint in this study was OS. Each patient was followed for a fixed period of three years. Results: Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that OS was significantly related to mean heart dose (MHD, hazard ratio [HR], 3.4 [1.8–6.3]; p < 0.001), pericardium V40 (HR, 3.2 [1.7–6.0]; p < 0.001), and total lung V20 (HR, 2.6 [1.4–5.0]; p = 0.003), and these were independent predictors for worse OS in multivariate analysis. Kaplan–Meier curve analysis with log-rank tests revealed that survival was significantly worse in patients with higher MHD (p < 0.001), pericardium V40 (p < 0.001), and total lung V20 (p = 0.002). Combining MHD and total lung V20, and pericardium V40 and total lung V20 provided enhanced risk stratification for OS (p < 0.001 for both combinations). Conclusions: The combination of heart and lung doses provided enhanced and more detailed risk stratification in prediction of OS for a fixed period of three years in LA-NSCLC patients treated with radiotherapy.

Phase II study of carboplatin plus weekly paclitaxel with bevacizumab for non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (Hanshin Cancer Group IP002)

Abstract Background There is an increased risk of acute exacerbation of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia when treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. There is no standard optimal treatment regimen for patients with lung cancer complicated with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of carboplatin (CBDCA), bevacizumab (Bmab) and weekly paclitaxel (PXT) in patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. Methods This phase 2 study involved chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. Patients received CBDCA (area under the curve: 5 on day 1), PXT (70 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15) and Bmab (15 mg/kg on day 1) every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate. Results Twenty-one patients were enrolled between January 2013 and October 2018 and received at least one course of the protocol treatment. The study was terminated before enrolling the planned number of patients because of poor accrual. The median patient age was 69 (range: 62–79) years, and 19 (90.5%) patients were men. The overall response rate was 61.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 38.4–81.9), meeting the primary endpoint. The median progression-free survival, time to treatment failure, and overall survival were 9.69 (95% CI, 5.78–11.63), 8.21 (95% CI, 3.75–11.63) and 20.93 (95% CI, 13.17–29.83) months, respectively. There was no acute exacerbation or treatment-related death during protocol treatment. Conclusion The results indicate that patients with advanced non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia could be effectively and safely treated using a combination of CBDCA, PXT and Bmab.

Chinese Medical Association guideline for clinical diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer (2024 edition)

To further standardize lung cancer prevention and treatment measures in China, enhance the quality of diagnosis and treatment, improve patient prognosis, and provide evidence-based medical guidance for clinicians at all levels, the Chinese Medical Association convened experts from respiratory medicine, oncology, thoracic surgery, radiotherapy, imaging, and pathology to develop the Chinese Medical Association's Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines for Lung Cancer (2024 edition). This consensus resulted in several updates from the 2023 version. The 2024 guidelines highlight that the risk of lung cancer in smokers remains higher than that of non-smokers even 15 years after quitting. Additionally, a new lung cancer incidence risk model is expected to become a critical tool for screening high-risk groups. In pathology, the guidelines now include pathological evaluation of surgically resected lung cancer specimens following neoadjuvant therapy and suggest that immunohistochemical staining of certain transcription factors may aid in the classification of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In molecular detection, the guidelines propose simultaneous detection of driver gene variations based on both RNA and DNA from specimens. The new edition also provides detailed descriptions of patient selection and surgical requirements for thoracic sub-lobectomy, aligned with the 9th TNM staging. Moreover, the guidelines expand treatment options, approving more therapies for immunoadjuvant and EGFR-TKI resistant lung cancer patients, as well as additional drug options for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations, EGFR 20 insertions, ALK fusions, and MET exon 14 skipping. These recommendations are based on state-approved drug applications, international guidelines, and current clinical practices in China, integrating the latest evidence-based medical research in screening, diagnosis, pathology, genetic testing, immune molecular marker detection, treatment methods, and follow-up care. The goal is to provide comprehensive and reasonable recommendations for clinicians, imaging specialists, laboratory technicians, rehabilitation professionals, and other medical staff at all levels.

Negative-predictive value of SUVmax for Ascertaining the efficacy of osimertinib in EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer

BackgroundFluorine-18 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) is routinely used to stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether 18F-FDG accumulation in primary tumors affects the efficacy of osimertinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive NSCLC remains unclear. MethodsWe retrospectively investigated 74 patients with advanced or postoperative recurrent EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT and were treated with osimertinib as first-line therapy between September 2018 and March 2023 at Kumamoto University Hospital. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of each primary tumor was measured, and the patients were divided into two groups according to the median SUVmax. The effects of SUVmax on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. ResultsThe median SUVmax was 8.2 (interquartile range: 5.5–11.4). The median PFS in the high SUVmax group (≥8.2) was significantly shorter than that in the low SUVmax group (<8.2). The respective median PFSs were 11.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.1–19.3 months) vs. 22.9 months (95% CI: 12.4–33.4 months) (P = 0.015), although the OS values did not differ significantly. Multivariate analysis showed that a high SUVmax was an independent negative predictive factor for PFS in patients treated with osimertinib (hazard ratio, 2.25; 95% CI: 1.15–4.39, P = 0.017). ConclusionsHigh primary-lesion SUVmax in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC correlated with shorter PFS with first-line osimertinib therapy, suggesting that SUVmax is a useful predictive marker for the antitumor efficacy of osimertinib.

Impact of sarcopenia on the prognosis of patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer treated with antiangiogenic therapy: A propensity score matching analysis

AbstractBackgroundLimited information is available regarding the impact of sarcopenia on the prognosis of antiangiogenic therapy in individuals with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study primarily sought to examine the prognostic significance of sarcopenia in individuals with advanced NSCLC undergoing antiangiogenic therapy.MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled all patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria from 2019 to 2021 at Nantong University Hospital. Patients were grouped according to the presence or absence of sarcopenia. After propensity score matching (PSM), progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse event rates were compared between the two groups. Factors associated with prognosis were screened using univariate and multivariate analyses.ResultsA total of 267 patients were included, with a total of 201 matched at baseline after PSM (77 in the sarcopenia group and 124 in the non‐sarcopenia group). The sarcopenia group had lower PFS (p = 0.043) and OS (p = 0.011) than the non‐sarcopenia group and a higher incidence of adverse events (p = 0.044). Multivariate analysis suggested that sarcopenia is an independent prognostic risk factor for OS in advanced NSCLC patients receiving antiangiogenic therapies (p = 0.009). Results of subgroup analyses showed some differences in the impact of sarcopenia on survival prognosis in populations with different characteristics.ConclusionPatients with advanced NSCLC with comorbid sarcopenia exhibit a worse prognosis when treated with antiangiogenic therapy, and preventing and ameliorating sarcopenia may lead to better survival outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Abstract A087: Clinical outcomes in Black patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC treated with osimertinib

Abstract Introduction: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations are present in about 15% of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases in the U.S. The FLAURA study, in which the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) Osimertinib demonstrated a median PFS of 18.9 months, set the current standard in the U.S. for front-line treatment of advanced NSCLC with sensitizing EGFR mutations. However, Black patients were greatly underrepresented in the FLAURA study (&amp;lt;1% of trial population) and two retrospective single-institution studies suggest inferior survival in Black patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with TKIs versus (vs.) other races. Research is needed using large real-world cohorts to evaluate real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) in Black patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC to determine whether they derive comparable benefit from Osimertinib as other races. Methods: The nationwide Flatiron Health Electronic Health Record (EHR)-derived de-identified database was used to analyze data from 1503 patients with advanced NSCLC bearing an EGFR exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation who received front-line Osimertinib. The de-identified data originated from 280 US cancer clinics (∼800 sites of care). Patients were stratified by race (Black vs. White) and characteristics were compared using chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and t-tests. Kaplan-Meier curves estimated rwPFS (based on clinician documentation of progression) and OS in months (m). Differences in survival were assessed between Black and White patients using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models that adjusted for age, gender, EGFR subtype, histology, diagnosis year, smoking history, performance status, insurance status, and socioeconomic index. Results: In our cohort, comprised of 179 Black and 1324 White patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, median age and percentage with a smoking history did not differ by race. However, Black patients were more likely to be female (74.3% vs. 66.4%, p=0.03), possess an exon 19 deletion tumor (74.3% vs. 58.3%, p&amp;lt;0.001) or be in a low socioeconomic index category (30.2% vs. 8.7%, p&amp;lt;0.001) than White patients. Median rwPFS did not significantly differ between Black and White patients treated with Osimertinib (15.1 m vs. 14.1 m, HR 0.91, p=0.39). Similarly, no significant difference in OS was observed among Black patients treated with Osimertinib as compared to Whites (29.2 m vs. 32.5 m, HR 1.07, p=0.57). Conclusion: This real-world analysis of one of the largest cohorts of Black patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC to date, did not observe differences in rwPFS and OS as compared to White patients following front-line Osimertinib therapy. Efforts should be made to ensure all patients receive mutational testing upfront so they can receive optimal first line therapy. Citation Format: Neel Belani, Farsha Rizwan, Jill Hasler, Jessica Bauman, Khadijah Mitchell, Hossein Borghaei, Joseph N Bodor. Clinical outcomes in Black patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC treated with osimertinib [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr A087.

Assessment of NSCLC disease burden: A survival model-based meta-analysis study

We present a meta-analytics approach to quantify NSCLC disease burden by integrative survival models. Aggregated survival data from public sources were used to parameterize the models for early as well as advanced NSCLC stages incorporating chemotherapies, targeted therapies, and immunotherapies. Overall survival (OS) was predicted in a heterogeneous patient cohort based on various stratifications and initial conditions. Pharmacoeconomic metrics (life years gained (LYG) and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained), were evaluated to quantify the benefits of specialized treatments and improved early detection of NSCLC. Simulations showed that the introduction of novel therapies for the advanced NSCLC sub-group increased median survival by 8.1 months (95 % CI: 5.9, 10.0), with corresponding gains of 2.9 months (95 % CI: 2.2, 3.6) in LYG and 1.65 months (95 % CI: 1.2, 2.0) in QALY. Scenarios representing improved detection of early cancer in the whole patient cohort, revealed up to 17.6 (95 % CI: 16.5, 19.0) and 15.7 months (95 % CI: 14.8, 16.6) increase in median survival, with respective gains of 6.2 months (95 % CI: 5.9, 6.4) and 5.2 months (95 % CI: 4.9, 5.4) in LYG and 6.6 months (95 % CI: 6.4, 6.7) and 6.0 months (95 % CI: 5.9, 6.2) in QALY for conventional and optimal treatment. This integrative modeling platform, aimed at characterizing cancer burden, allows to precisely quantify the cumulative benefits of introducing specialized therapies into the treatment schemes and survival prolongation upon early detection of the disease.

Targeted therapies, novel antibodies, and immunotherapies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: clinical evidence and drug approval patterns.

Since 2011, the U.S. FDA has approved 30 new drugs for use in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), mainly comprising tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors. NSCLC with oncogene driver alterations is amenable to treatment with targeted drugs, usually small molecule inhibitors. In these cases, the demonstration of high overall response rates, coupled with a lasting duration of response, has allowed for accelerated approval in the U.S., based on single or multi-cohort trials. Confirmatory clinical evidence was subsequently provided through post-marketing trials. In NSCLC without such driver alterations, regulatory agencies in both the U.S. and the EU set clinical evidence expectations that foster the conduct of studies primarily focused on determining survival or event-free survival, based on randomized-controlled trial designs. This review analyzes the approval patterns of novel therapeutics for NSCLC with a focus on small molecule inhibitors that target driver alterations, as well as biologicals. The latter include monoclonal antibodies inhibiting immune checkpoints like PD-(L)1 or cell surface receptors, and antibody-drug conjugates, highly potent biologics linked to a cytotoxic compound. The differentiation of NSCLC into oncogene- and non-oncogene-addicted subtypes determines drug development strategies, the extent of the clinical development program, access to orphan drug development incentives, and regulatory approval strategies.

Real-world comparative effectiveness of sotorasib versus docetaxel in second line and beyond among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

ObjectivesTo evaluate the comparative effectiveness of sotorasib monotherapy versus docetaxel as monotherapy or combination therapy in patients with pretreated KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC in the real-world. MethodsA US-based electronic health record–derived de-identified database was used in this study. Patients with pretreated KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC who initiated sotorasib between May 28, 2021, and September 30, 2022, and docetaxel between January 1, 2019, and September 30, 2022 (to enhance sample size), were included, with a minimum of 12-month opportunity for follow-up. Treatment groups were balanced via overlap weighting propensity score methods. Median OS in the 2L and 2L+ settings were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated via Cox proportional hazard models. ResultsOverall, the clinical characteristics in sotorasib and docetaxel cohorts were balanced after propensity score weighting. At baseline, most patients were > 65 years of age, had ECOG performance status of 0–1, were from the community practice setting, had advanced stage at initial diagnosis, and had prior anti-PD-(L)1 treatment and/or platinum-based chemotherapy. In the 2L setting, the median OS (95 % CI) for sotorasib (N=102) and docetaxel (N=58) patients was 10.2 (7.6–16.3) and 6.0 (4.2–11.0) months, respectively, with a corresponding mortality HR (95 % CI) of 0.62 (0.41–0.93). In the 2L+ setting, the median OS (95 % CI) for sotorasib (N=164) and docetaxel (N=116) was 10.2 (8.0–14.6) and 7.2 (5.1–10.6) months, respectively, with a corresponding mortality HR (95 % CI) of 0.65 (0.49–0.87). In patients with prior anti-PD-(L)1 treatment, the mortality HR (95 % CI) in the sotorasib group versus docetaxel was 0.61 (0.39–0.94) and 0.65 (0.48–0.89) in the 2L and 2L+ settings, respectively. Findings from other subgroups were consistent with the primary analyses. ConclusionIn this real-world comparative analysis of patients with pretreated KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC, sotorasib monotherapy demonstrated a longer median OS compared to docetaxel monotherapy or combination therapy.

Incidence of hematological toxicity with use of immunotherapy and chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Incidence of hematological toxicity with use of immunotherapy and chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Inhibition of hTERT/telomerase/telomere mediates therapeutic efficacy of osimertinib in EGFR mutant lung cancer.

The inevitable acquired resistance to osimertinib (AZD9291), an FDA-approved third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR activating or T790M resistant mutations, limits its long-term clinical benefit. Telomere maintenance via telomerase reactivation is linked to uncontrolled cell growth and is a cancer hallmark and an attractive cancer therapeutic target. Our effort toward understanding the action mechanisms, including resistance mechanisms, of osimertinib has led to the identification of a novel and critical role in maintaining c-Myc-dependent downregulation of hTERT, a catalytic subunit of telomerase, and subsequent inhibition of telomerase/telomere and induction of telomere dysfunction in mediating therapeutic efficacy of osimertinib. Consequently, osimertinib combined with the telomere inhibitor, 6-Thio-dG, which is currently tested in a phase II trial, effectively inhibited the growth of osimertinib-resistant tumors, regressed EGFRm NSCLC patient-derived xenografts, and delayed the emergence of acquired resistance to osimertinib, warranting clinical validation of this strategy to manage osimertinib acquired resistance.

Repurposing Antiviral Drugs as Potential Anti-EGFR Agents in NSCLC: A Structure-Based Screening and Molecular Dynamics Analysis.

One of the problems resulting from recurrent hyperactivated or mutant epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is therapeutic resistance. Consequently, this leads to increased expressionof oncogenicproteins and reduces the efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This study assessed antiviral drug efficacy as potential anti-EGFR agentsfor NSCLC. We used structure-based virtual screening to evaluate 66 antiviral drugs thoroughly. The top 6 antiviral drugs exhibiting impressive binding energies (i.e. surpassing a threshold of -8.5 kcalmol-1) were identified. Subsequent bioactivity analysis and ADMET profiling were performed to select the most promising candidates, followed by a molecular dynamic simulation. Among the selected antiviral regimens, dolutegravir demonstrated the highest docking score (-9.8 kcalmol-1), followed by rilpivirine and ensitrelvir, surpassing other candidates and our reference EGFR TKI. Further molecular dynamics simulations revealed promising dynamic interactions of dolutegravir, ensitrelvir, and rilpivirine with the EGFR target as compared with afatinib. Our findings highlight the repositioning potential of antiviral drugs for anti-EGFR drug discovery, supported by their robust docking scores, ADMET profiles, dynamic interactions, and binding free energies. The results open up new avenues for advanced NSCLC therapy. Further in vitro investigations are warranted to evaluate their efficacy and safety.