Advanced Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Research Articles

A Pilot Trial of Consolidation Bevacizumab after Hypo-Fractionated Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Unresectable Locally Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

To assess the feasibility of adding bevacizumab consolidation into hypo-fractionated concurrent chemoradiotherapy (hypo-CCRT) in patients with unresectable locally advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NS-NSCLC). Eligible patients were treated with hypo-RT (40 Gy in 10 fractions) followed by hypo-boost (24-28 Gy in 6-7 fractions) combined with concurrent weekly chemotherapy. Patients completed the hypo-CCRT without≥G2 toxicities then received consolidation bevacizumab every 3 weeks for up to 1 year, or disease progression or unacceptable treatment related toxicities. The primary endpoint was the risk of G4 or higher hemorrhage. The secondary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), locoregional failure-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and objective response rate (ORR). All time-to-event endpoints (OS, PFS, LRFS and DMFS) were measured from the start of radiotherapy. From December 2017 to July 2020, a total of 27 patients were analyzed with a median follow-up duration of 28.0 months. One patient (3.7%) developed G5 hemorrhage during bevacizumab consolidation. Besides, there were 7 patients (25.9%) had G3 cough and 3 patients (11.1%) had G3 pneumonitis. The ORR was 92.6% of the whole cohort. The median OS was 37.0 months (95% confidence interval, 8.9-65.1 months), the median PFS was 16.0 months (95% confidence interval, 14.0-18.0 months), the median LRFS was not reached and the median DMFS was 18.0 months. This pilot study met its goal of demonstrating the tolerability of consolidation bevacizumab after hypo-CCRT. Further investigation of antiangiogenic and immunotherapy combinations in LA-NSCLC is warranted while G3 respiratory toxicities is worth considering.

A multicenter, open-label, phase II trial of pemetrexed plus bevacizumab in elderly patients with previously untreated advanced or recurrent nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer.

Although the incidence of lung cancer in elderly individuals has been increasing in recent years, the number of clinical trials designed specifically for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still limited. To fulfill this unmet medical need, we conducted a phase II study to elucidate the efficacy of pemetrexed (PEM) plus bevacizumab (Bev) combination chemotherapy in elderly patients with nonsquamous NSCLC. A total of 29 elderly patients (≥75 years old) with nonsquamous NSCLC were enrolled in this multicenter, open-label, phase II study, and 27 patients were finally analyzed. PEM at 500 mg/m2 on day 1 plus Bev at 15 mg/kg on day 1 were administered triweekly. The primary endpoint was the investigator-assessed objective response rate. The median age at initiating chemotherapy was 80 years old. Almost all patients (92.6%) had adenocarcinoma histology. The median number of cycles administered was 6, and the objective response rate was 40.7%. The median progression-free survival, overall survival and 1-year survival were 8.8 months, 27.2 months and 79%, respectively. The treatment was well-tolerated, and no treatment-related death was observed. Combination chemotherapy with PEM plus Bev in elderly patients with previously untreated advanced non-squamous NSCLC exhibited favorable antitumor activity and tolerability, suggesting that a combination of PEM plus Bev might be a promising treatment option for this population.

Efficacy of paclitaxel-carboplatin with bevacizumab as a late-line therapy for patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer: A platinum rechallenge.

There is no well-established late-line treatment for advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, we retrospectively determined the efficacy and safety of platinum rechallenge with paclitaxel-carboplatin and bevacizumab in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC as a late-line therapy in a clinical setting. Thirty patients with nonsquamous NSCLC who received paclitaxel-carboplatin with bevacizumab therapy as a late-line treatment at Sendai Kousei Hospital (Miyagi, Japan) between December 2011 and December 2021 were enrolled into the study. The efficacy and safety of this treatment were evaluated. The patients were further categorized into responders and nonresponders, and predictive factors of treatment response were estimated. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.3 (range, 4.9-6.8) months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 11.8 (range, 7.2-17.2) months. There were no significant differences in PFS and OS between patients with and those without epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. In the univariate analyses of this study, responders were younger than nonresponders (p = 0.012). No fatal adverse events were reported. With the increase in the number of treatment options in recent years, the sequence of treatments and overall therapeutic strategy are becoming increasingly important. Thus, platinum rechallenge with paclitaxel-carboplatin and bevacizumab, a late-line treatment for patients with nonsquamous NSCLC, may be an effective therapeutic option.

Thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) expression and the efficacy of combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors and cytotoxic chemotherapy in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

Thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) is expressed in approximately 70% of lung adenocarcinomas and is one of the most reliable makers to distinguish primary lung adenocarcinoma from metastatic disease. TTF-1-negative status is a poor prognostic factor, and TTF-1-negative lung adenocarcinoma is associated with poor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy. However, the relationship between TTF-1 expression and the efficacy of ICI plus chemotherapy is still unclear. We performed a retrospective analysis of 129 consecutive patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC) treated with ICI monotherapy or ICI plus chemotherapy between January 2016 and December 2021. The expression of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and TTF-1 was also determined in cases for which no previous data were available. We then evaluated the association between TTF-1 expression status and treatment efficacy. Of the 129 cases, 33 were TTF-1-negative and 96 were positive. In the ICI monotherapy group (N=70), progression-free survival (PFS) was not significantly different between TTF-1-positive and negative patients (median 3.6 vs. 3.8 months, P=0.27); however, in patients with wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), a trend for worse PFS was observed in TTF-1-negative cases compared with those that were TTF-1-positive (median 3.8 vs. 4.5 months, P=0.088). Moreover, long-term efficacy of ICI monotherapy (>2 years) was not observed in the TTF-1-negative group. TTF-1-negative patients tended to have worse overall survival (OS) than TTF-1-positive patients (median 15.6 vs. 19.5 months, P=0.13). In the ICI plus chemotherapy group (N=59), TTF-1-negative patients tended to have better PFS and similar OS compared with TTF-1-positive patients (median 9.9 vs. 9.6 months, P=0.14; median 32.3 vs. 18.9 months, P=0.78). Long-term efficacy was generally observed in TTF-1-negative patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel (ABCP) (median PFS 22.5 months, median OS not reached). ICI monotherapy is generally less efficacious in TTF-1-negative NS-NSCLC patients, and clinicians should consider ICI plus chemotherapy in these cases. Our study suggests that ABCP is an optimal regimen for TTF-1-negative NS-NSCLC.

Network meta-analysis of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer patients with PD-L1 expression ≥ 50%

IntroductionThe optimal first-line immunotherapy regimen for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC) patients with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 50% remains unclear. Our aim is to determine the most effective treatment regimen through a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing these treatments.MethodsA systematic search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases, and a Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted. To ensure transparency, the study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42022349712).ResultsThe analysis included 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 2037 patients and 12 immunotherapy combinations. ICI-ICI, ICI alone, and chemotherapy-ICI showed significant advantages over chemotherapy in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy showed the best OS results compared to chemotherapy. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy and sintilimab plus chemotherapy provided the best PFS results.ConclusionsFor NS-NSCLC patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, tislelizumab plus chemotherapy, and sintilimab plus chemotherapy are recommended as good treatment options based on the results of this Network meta-analysis (NMA).

Anlotinib plus icotinib as a potential treatment option for EGFR-mutated advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer with concurrent mutations: final analysis of the prospective phase 2, multicenter ALTER-L004 study

BackgroundNon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and concurrent mutations have a poor prognosis. This study aimed to examine anlotinib plus icotinib as a first-line treatment option for advanced NSCLC carrying EGFR mutation with or without concurrent mutations.MethodsThis phase 2, single-arm, multicenter trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03736837) was performed at five hospitals in China from December 2018 to November 2020. Non-squamous NSCLC cases with EGFR-sensitizing mutations were treated with anlotinib and icotinib. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity.ResultsSixty participants were enrolled, including 31 (52%) and 29 (48%) with concurrent mutations and pathogenic concurrent mutations, respectively. The median follow-up was 26.9 (range, 15.0-38.9) months. ORR and DCR were 68.5% and 98.2%, respectively. Median PFS was 15.1 (95%CI: 12.6–17.6) months which met the primary endpoint, median DoR was 13.5 (95%CI: 10.0-17.1) months, and median OS was 30.0 (95%CI: 25.5–34.5) months. Median PFS and OS in patients with pathogenic concurrent mutations were 15.6 (95%CI: 12.5–18.7) months and not reached (95%CI: 17.46 months to not reached), respectively. All patients experienced TRAEs, including 26 (43%) and 1 (1.7%) who had grade ≥ 3 and serious treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).ConclusionsAnlotinib combined with icotinib was effective and well-tolerated as a first-line treatment option for EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC with or without concurrent mutations.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03736837.

First-line nivolumab, paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: Updated survival analysis of the ONO-4538-52/TASUKI-52 randomized controlled trial.

ONO-4538-52/TASUKI-52 was performed in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan to determine the oncological effectiveness and safety of combining nivolumab or placebo with bevacizumab plus platinum chemotherapy for the initial (first-line) treatment of patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC). At the interim analysis (minimum follow-up, 7.4 months), the independent radiology review committee-assessed progression-free survival was significantly longer in the nivolumab arm, but overall survival (OS) data were immature. Here, we present the updated OS data. Patients with treatment-naïve stage IIIB/IV or recurrent nsNSCLC without driver mutations in ALK, EGFR, or ROS1, were randomized 1:1 to receive either nivolumab or placebo. Patients in both arms received paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab, administered 3-weekly for a maximum of 6 cycles. Nivolumab/placebo and bevacizumab were subsequently continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Overall, 550 patients were randomized. At the time of the analysis (minimum follow-up: 19.4 months), the median OS was longer in the nivolumab arm than in the placebo arm (30.8 vs. 24.7 months; hazard ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.94). The 12-month OS rates were 81.3% vs. 76.3% in the nivolumab vs. placebo arms, respectively. The respective 18-month OS rates were 69.0% vs. 61.9%. Nivolumab plus platinum chemotherapy and bevacizumab demonstrated longer OS vs. the placebo combination. We believe this regimen is viable as a standard, first-line treatment for patients with advanced nsNSCLC without driver mutations in ALK, EGFR, or ROS1.

Matched tissue and liquid biopsies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients A potentially indispensable complementary approach

The introduction of liquid biopsies (LB) has brought forth a number of therapeutic opportunities into the domain of thoracic oncology. Many of which have been adopted for care of patients presenting with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (aNS-NSCLC). For example, one of the most frequent indications to perform a LB in these patients, at least in Europe, is for patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting EGFR and ALK genomic alterations when the tumor progresses. A tissue biopsy (TB) must then be taken, ideally from a site of a tumor that progresses, in particular if the LB does not permit detection of a mechanism of resistance to TKI. A LB from a patient with aNS-NSCLC is recommended before first-line therapy if no tissue and/or cytological material is accessible or if the extracted nucleic acid is insufficient in amount and/or of poor quality. At present a LB and a TB are rarely performed simultaneously before treatment and/or on tumor progression. This complementary/matched testing approach is still controversial but needs to be better evaluated to determine the true benefit to care of patients. This review provides an update on the complementarity of the LB and TB method for care of patients presenting with aNS-NSCLC.

Cemiplimab + Chemo Shows Clinical Benefit in Advanced NSCLC

Cemiplimab + Chemo Shows Clinical Benefit in Advanced NSCLC

Phase 1b/2a safety and tolerability study of bemcentinib (BEM) with pembrolizumab/carboplatin/pemetrexed in first line (1L) advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without/with a STK11 mutation.

TPS9154 Background: The combination of platinum, pemetrexed, and pembrolizumab (CIT) has become the standard of care in 1L non–oncogene addicted NSCLC. Despite an initial improvement in response rate and survival, the 5-year survival of NSCLC remains approximately 20-30%, due to the emergence of primary and acquired resistance. Additionally, the presence of brain metastases occurs in ˜30-50% of NSCLC patients and confers a poor prognosis. Among the currently non-actionable mutations, STK11/LKB1 mutations (STK11m) are common (˜20%) in NSCLC. Recent evidence suggests that STK11m NSCLC patients have a minimal response to checkpoint inhibitors and to chemo-immunotherapy in the first line setting. STK11m tumors are characterized by an immune-suppressed phenotype which is highly associated with AXL signalling. BEM, a first-in-class, oral, selective AXL inhibitor, has demonstrated the ability to prevent chemoresistance, re-sensitize STK11m NSCLC tumors to pembrolizumab, and enhance efficacy of CIT in preclinical lung models. Moreover, following oral administration, BEM readily distributes in brain tumour tissue in recurrent glioblastoma patients, with a 25.9 mean ratio of drug concentration in brain tissue to plasma. Therefore, the addition of BEM to CIT has the potential to improve 1L treatment outcomes in NSCLC overall and particularly in STK11m tumors. Methods: This is an open-label, multi-center, phase 1b/2a study to assess the safety, tolerability, and preliminary anti-tumor activity of BEM + CIT as 1L treatment in patients with advanced (Stage IIIb/IIIc) or metastatic (Stage IV) non-squamous NSCLC without actionable mutations. Patients with stable brain metastases are eligible to participate. Phase 1b follows a 3+3 design and will explore CIT in combination with one of 3 BEM dose levels: Cohort 1 = 75mg; Cohort 2 = 100 mg; or Cohort 3 = 150 mg. BEM is administered orally once/day on Day 1 of each 21-day treatment cycle. After 4 cycles of CIT + BEM, maintenance with BEM + pemetrexed + pembrolizumab is administered for up to 2 years. An independent data safety monitoring board will assess the safety data at the end of the dose-limiting toxicity period (the first 21 days of treatment for each patient, i.e. cycle 1) of each cohort and will recommend the BEM dose for the phase 2a expansion. In the phase 2a, up to 40 patients harboring a STK11m (regardless of their co-mutational status), in the absence of driver mutations will be enrolled. The study will include extensive co-mutational analyses via next-generation sequencing to identify potential sub-groups of patients deriving particular benefit. The trial is open to patient enrolment in phase1b in the US; recruitment for phase 2a is planned to open in Q2 2023 in Europe and US. EudraCT 2019‐003806‐28/NA/124645. Clinical trial information: NCT05469178 .

Phase 1b/2 study of surufatinib in combination with docetaxel as second-line treatment of advanced driver-gene negative non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

e21087 Background: Advanced driver-gene negative non-squamous NSCLC has few second-line treatment choices. Surufatinib is a new antiangiogenic drug that potently inhibits VEGFR1，2，3, FGFR1 and CSF-1R. The purpose of this trial was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose of surufatinib in combination with docetaxel through a phase 1b study and to further analyze the preliminary efficacy and safety of the combination therapy in patients with advanced driver-gene negative non-squamous NSCLC. Methods: Advanced driver-gene negative non-squamous NSCLC patients progressed after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (the combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors and/or bevacizumab was allowed) were enrolled to treat with surufatinib in combination with docetaxel. Using a 3 + 3 study design in the phase 1b dose-escalation portion, patients received surufatinib at doses ranging from 200 mg/day to 300 mg/day for 21 days per cycle. Surufatinib was started at a dose of 250 mg/day and exploratory dose of 300 mg/day if no patients develop dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in the first 3 patients in the first treatment cycle. If 2 or more of the 3 patients develop DLT, exploratory dose of 200 mg/day. Concomitant treatment with docetaxel at a dose of 60 mg/m2. The primary objective of the study was the recommended phase 2 dose of surufatinib in combination with docetaxel. The secondary objective was the preliminary efficacy and safety. Results: At data cut-off (December 31, 2022), we recruited 9 patients in phase 1b portion. Three patients were enrolled in the surufatinib 250 mg/day dose cohort. Among them, 2 developed DLT (1 patient with grade 3 oral mucositis and 1 patient with grade 3 elevated blood bilirubin) which did not recur with a reduction of dosage to 200 mg/day. A total of 6 patients were enrolled in the 200 mg/day dose cohort and 1 patient developed DLT (grade 3 diarrhoea). The recommended phase 2 dose was established as surufatinib 200 mg/day combined with docetaxel 60 mg/m2.At present, there were 3 patients enrolled in phase 2. Among the 12 patients enrolled in this study, 1 patient was lost and 11 patients were assessable for treatment efficacy and safty. The objective response rate (ORR) was 27.2% (3/11) and the disease control rate (DCR) was 100%. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 5.8 months (95% CI = 2.1-9.4). The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were diarrhoea (33.3%), neutropenia (41.7%), hypertension (25%), and anaemia (33.3%). Common grade 3 AEs included diarrhoea (16.7%), neutropenia (33.3%) and anaemia (16.7%), with no unexpected treatment-related AEs (TRAEs). Conclusions: Surufatinib in combination with docetaxel was an effective second-line treatment for patients with advanced driver-gene negative non-squamous NSCLC. The clinical benefit was encouraging, and the safety profile was acceptable. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2100047313 .

Prevalence of actionable oncogenic alterations (AGA) among patients with advanced (adv) non-squamous (NSQ) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by age, sex, and race in the United States (US).

e21206 Background: Identification of AGA in NSCLC has improved the understanding of lung cancer pathogenesis and introduced targeted therapies directed against specific genomic alterations. Given the limited data on the prevalence of AGA by demographics, we evaluated prevalence of AGA by age at diagnosis (dx), sex, and race. Methods: A descriptive study used the US nationwide de-identified Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine NSCLC clinico-genomic database. Eligible patients were adults with a dx of adv NSQ NSCLC from Jan-2016 to Sep-2020 who initiated a first line therapy. The prevalence of AGA for each age, sex, or race stratum was calculated. Results: The cohort included 3938 patients; 67.9% White, 52.9% female, and median age at dx was 68 y. Table 1 presents the prevalence of AGA. The prevalence of EGFR and BRAF V600E mutations increased with age at dx. ALK rearrangement and ROS1 fusion were more prevalent among patients < 50 y vs ≥50 y while MET exon 14 skipping mutation was more prevalent among patients ≥75 y vs < 75 y. EGFR and KRAS G12C mutations were more prevalent in female vs male. Compared to White or Black, Asians had a higher prevalence of EGFR mutations and lower prevalence of KRAS G12C. Conclusions: The prevalence of certain AGA among patients with adv NSCLC vary by demographics, which may contribute to disproportionate disease burden in certain strata. These results highlight the need to enhance diversity of clinical trial populations and ensure the disease burden across demographics in the general population are represented in clinical trials. [Table: see text]

Immunotherapy or antiangiogenic therapy plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of patients with PD-L1(-) advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in a Chinese cohort.

For patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), immunotherapy or antiangiogenic therapy combined with pemetrexed and cisplatin/carboplatin have both shown significant efficacy at programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) levels of <1%. Our study aimed to compare two first-line regimens for patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC who were negative for PD-L1. A retrospective cohort study was conducted comparing the outcomes of patients with advanced PD-L1(-) nonsquamous NSCLC who were treated with antiangiogenic therapy plus chemotherapy (A Group) to those who were treated with anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies plus chemotherapy (mAbs) (B Group). Both regimens were evaluated for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and side effects. 114 patients were enrolled in the study, 82 in Group A and 32 in Group B. Those in Group A had a longer median PFS (9.8 vs. 6.7 months, p = 0.025). The OS was also achieved (p = 0.058). No statistically significant difference was seen in ORR (52.4% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.815) or DCR (93.9% vs. 87.5%, p = 0.225) between the two groups. Patients in the A group who did not smoke and did not have specific metastases could benefit from survival. Adverse events (AEs) in both groups were tolerated. Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy outperformed immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in terms of PFS.

Bevacizumab loaded CalliSpheres® bronchial arterial chemoembolization combined with immunotherapy and targeted therapy for advanced lung adenocarcinoma.

Background: As a new drug delivery and embolization system, drug-eluted bronchial artery chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) can not only embolize the tumor blood supply artery but also load chemotherapy drugs and slowly release them into the local environment. Bevacizumab (BEV) combined with chemotherapy drugs has attained significant achievements in the first-line treatment of advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The role of BEV-loaded DEB-BACE combined with immunotherapy and targeted therapy in patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is unclear. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab-loaded CalliSpheres® bronchial arterial chemoembolization combined with immunotherapy and targeted therapy in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Methods: Nine patients with LUAD who received BEV-loaded CalliSpheres® BACE combined with immunotherapy and targeted therapy from 1 Jan 2021 to Dec 2021 were included in this study. The primary endpoint was the disease control rate (DCR) and the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were the overall survival rates (OS) at 6months and 12months. The tumor response was evaluated according to the mRECIST standard. Safety was assessed by the occurrences of adverse events and the severity of the adverse events. Results: All patients received CalliSpheres® BACE loaded with BEV (200mg) in combination with immunotherapy and targeted therapy. A total of nine patients received the BACE procedures 20 times, four of them received a third session of BACE, three underwent a second session of DEB-BACE, and two underwent one cycle of DEB-BACE. Partial response and stable disease were found in seven (77.8%), and two (22.2%) patients, respectively, 1month after the last multimodal treatment. The ORR at 1, 3, 6, and 12months was 77.8%, 66.7%, 44.4%, and 33.3%, respectively, while the DCR was 100%, 77.8%, 44.4%, and 33.3%, respectively. The OS rates at 6-and 12-month were 77.8% and 66.7%, respectively. There were no serious adverse events. Conclusion: BEV-loaded CalliSpheres® transcatheter bronchial arterial chemoembolization combined with immunotherapy and targeted therapy is a promising and well-tolerated treatment for patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

A Real-World Experience from a Single Center (LPCE, Nice, France) Highlights the Urgent Need to Abandon Immunohistochemistry for ROS1 Rearrangement Screening of Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

The detection of ROS1 rearrangements in metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung carcinoma (NS-NSCLC) permits administration of efficient targeted therapy. Detection is based on a testing algorithm associated with ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) screening followed by ROS1 FISH and/or next generation sequencing (NGS) to confirm positivity. However, (i) ROS1 rearrangements are rare (1-2% of NS-NSCLC), (ii) the specificity of ROS1 IHC is not optimal, and (iii) ROS1 FISH is not widely available, making this algorithm challenging to interpret time-consuming. We evaluated RNA NGS, which was used as reflex testing for ROS1 rearrangements in NS-NSCLC with the aim of replacing ROS1 IHC as a screening method. ROS1 IHC and RNA NGS were prospectively performed in 810 NS-NSCLC. Positive results were analyzed by ROS1 FISH. ROS1 IHC was positive in 36/810 (4.4%) cases that showed variable staining intensity while NGS detected ROS1 rearrangements in 16/810 (1.9%) cases. ROS1 FISH was positive in 15/810 (1.8%) of ROS1 IHC positive cases and in all positive ROS1 NGS cases. Obtaining both ROS1 IHC and ROS1 FISH reports took an average of 6 days, while obtaining ROS1 IHC and RNA NGS reports took an average of 3 days. These results showed that systematic screening for the ROS1 status using IHC must be replaced by NGS reflex testing.

Correlation between KRAS mutation subtypes and prognosis in Chinese advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer patients.

The relationship between mutant KRAS and the risk of disease progression and death in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still controversial among current studies, and the effects of distinct KRAS mutations on prognosis may be different. This study aimed to further investigate the association between them. Of the 184 patients eventually included in the study, 108 had KRAS wild type (WT) and 76 had KRAS mutant type (MT). Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to describe the survival for patients among groups, while log-rank tests were conducted to evaluate the survival differences. The univariate and multivariate Cox regression were performed to identify predictors, and subgroup analysis was used to verify the interaction effect. Similar efficacy of first-line therapy was observed for KRAS MT and WT patients (p = 0.830). The association between KRAS mutation and progression-free survival (PFS) was not significant in univariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.66-1.35), and no KRAS mutation subtype significantly affected PFS. However, KRAS mutation and KRAS non-G12C were associated with increased risk of death compared to KRAS WT in univariate and multivariate analysis. Univariate and multivariate analysis also confirmed that chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenesis or immunotherapy in the KRAS mutation group was associated with decreased risk of disease progression. However, the overall survival (OS) among KRAS mutant patients received different first-line treatments did not significantly differ. KRAS mutations and their subtypes are not independent negative predictors of PFS, while KRAS mutation and KRAS non-G12C were independent prognostic factors for OS. Chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenesis or immunotherapy conferred decreased risk of disease progression to KRAS mutation patients compared to single chemotherapy.

Bevacizumab/PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer.

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of PD-1 inhibitor or bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC). Methods: We retrospectively collected data for patients with advanced nsNSCLC who underwent first-line treatment with PD-1 inhibitor or bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (IC and BC groups). Propensity score matching (PSM) was adopted to balance covariates. Results: 278 patients were enrolled, after PSM (n=104/group), the objective response rate was 45.1% and 24.0% in the IC and BC groups (p=0.001). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.5 and 8.2months (p=0.007), and duration of response was 14.8 versus 8.1months (p=0.007), respectively. In subgroup analysis, the PFS for those patients with PD-L1≥1% (16.2 vs 6.8months, p=0.000) was significantly longer in the IC group than that in BC group, but not in the PD-L1<1% subgroup (8.9 vs12.7months, p=0.719). Conclusion: PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy was superior to bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced nsNSCLC, which is debatable for patients with PD-L1<1%.

Response characteristics of tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy in first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer

Objective: To investigate the response characteristics of patients with locally advanced/metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsq-NSCLC) treated with tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy in the first line. Methods: Patients with nsq-NSCLC who achieved complete or partial remission after treatment with tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone in the RATIONALE 304 study, as assessed by an independent review board, were selected to analyze the response characteristics and safety profile of the responders. Time to response (TTR) was defined as the time from randomization to the achievement of first objective response. Depth of response (DpR) was defined as the maximum percentage of tumor shrinkage compared with the sum of the baseline target lesion length diameters. Results: As of January 23, 2020, 128 patients treated with tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy achieved objective tumor response (responders), representing 57.4%(128/223) of the intention-to-treat population, with a TTR of 5.1 to 33.3 weeks and a median TTR of 7.9 weeks. Of the responders (128), 50.8%(65) achieved first remission at the first efficacy assessment (week 6), 31.3%(40) at the second efficacy assessment (week 12), and 18.0%(23) at the third and subsequent tumor assessments. The percentages of responders who achieved a depth of tumor response of 30% to <50%, 50% to <70% and 70% to 100% were 45.3%(58/128), 28.1%(36/128) and 26.6%(34/128), respectively, with median progression-free survival (PFS) of 9.0 months (95% CI: 7.7 to 9.9 months), 11.5 months (95% CI: 7.7 months to not reached) and not reached (95% CI: 11.8 months to not estimable), respectively. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy were generally well tolerated in responders with similar safety profile to the overall safety population. Conclusion: Among responders to tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy for nsq-NSCLC, 82.0%(105/128) achieves response within the first two tumor assessments (12 weeks) and 18.0%(23/128) achieves response at later (18 to 33 weeks) assessments, and there is a trend toward prolonged PFS in responders with deeper tumor response.

82 - Secondary care resource utilisation in patients with high PDL1 and advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSq-NSCLC): a comparison of single agent pembrolizumab with combination chemotherapy + pembrolizumab

82 - Secondary care resource utilisation in patients with high PDL1 and advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSq-NSCLC): a comparison of single agent pembrolizumab with combination chemotherapy + pembrolizumab

Comparing the cost-effectiveness of sintilimab + pemetrexed plus platinum and pemetrexed plus platinum alone as a first-line therapy for Chinese patients with nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer.

Pemetrexed plus platinum alone is the conventional first-line therapy for locally advanced metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without targetable genetic aberrations. The ORIENT-11 trial revealed that sintilimab + pemetrexed plus platinum could yield more survival benefits for patients with nonsquamous NSCLC. The present study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of sintilimab + pemetrexed plus platinum vs. that of pemetrexed plus platinum alone as the first-line therapy for patients with nonsquamous NSCLC to inform clinically rational drug use and provide a basis for medical decision-making. A partitioned survival model was created to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of two groups from the perspective of the healthcare system in China. The clinical data for adverse event probabilities and extrapolating long-term survival originally collected in a phase III clinical trial (ORIENT-11) were retrieved. Local public databases and literature were used to acquire data on utility and cost. The heemod package in R software was used to calculate the life years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), and total costs in each group to generate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in the base case and to conduct deterministic sensitivity analysis (DSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA). Our base case analysis (BCA) revealed that sintilimab combined with pemetrexed plus platinum provided an increase of 0.86 in QALYs with an increasing cost of United State dollar (USD) $4,317.84 relative to pemetrexed plus platinum in Chinese patients with nonsquamous NSCLC who were negative for targetable genetic variations, which induced an ICER of USD $5,020.74/QALY. The ICER value was lower than the set threshold value. The results exhibited strong robustness in the sensitivity analysis. In DSA, the parameter for the overall survival (OS) curve in chemotherapy and the cost of best supportive care were the main factors that impacted the result of the ICER. The PSA indicated that sintilimab and chemotherapy combination therapy was cost-effective. This study suggests that the combination of sintilimab + pemetrexed plus platinum is cost-effective as a first-line therapy in Chinese patients with nonsquamous NSCLC who are negative for targetable genetic variations from the perspective of the healthcare system.