Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Research Articles

Does caring for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer affect health-related quality of life of caregivers? A multicenter, cross-sectional study

PurposePatients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) mostly receive essential routine care and support from informal caregivers, who usually experience poorer health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The study aimed to evaluate the HRQoL and its predictors among informal caregivers of patients with advanced NSCLC in China.MethodsWe interviewed the adult caregiver population of patients with advanced NSCLC (stage IIIB~IV) in nine tertiary hospitals from multiple provinces in China between November 2020 and June 2021. The EQ-5D-5L instrument measured the HRQoL of caregivers, as analyzed by employing descriptive analysis, univariate analysis, Tobit regression, and multivariate logistic regression, and investigated the important influencing factors further.ResultsA valid sample of 553 caregivers was analyzed. The mean EQ-5D-5L utility score of caregivers was 0.92 (SD = 0.14). Caregivers reported the greatest problems in mental health, with 45.39% reporting slight, moderate, severe, or extreme anxiety/depression. The potential influencing factors of HRQoL in caregivers included patients' age and cancer histology, relationship with the patients, and daily caregiving hours. Compared to other caregivers, patients' spouses had the lowest HRQoL. In addition, over six hours of caregiving per day was associated with lower HRQoL in caregivers of patients with advanced NSCLC.ConclusionsThe HRQoL of caregivers for patients with advanced NSCLC was investigated for the first time in China. The informal caregivers experience decreased HRQoL, with anxiety /depression problems being reported the most. The findings of this study would provide extensive information on the HRQoL of advanced NSCLC patients' caregivers for future health-promoting self-care.

Safety and effectiveness of CIMAvax-EGF administered in community polyclinics.

https://rpcec.sld.cu/trials/RPCEC00000205-En, identifier RPCEC00000205.

Lipid alterations play a role in the integration of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and anlotinib for the treatment of advanced non–small-cell lung cancer

BackgroundStudies have shown that integrating anlotinib with programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors enhances survival rates among progressive non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients lacking driver mutations. However, not all individuals experience clinical benefits from this therapy. As a result, it is critical to investigate the factors that contribute to the inconsistent response of patients. Recent investigations have emphasized the importance of lipid metabolic reprogramming in the development and progression of NSCLC.MethodsThe objective of this investigation was to examine the correlation between lipid variations and observed treatment outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients who were administered PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alongside anlotinib. A cohort composed of 30 individuals diagnosed with advanced NSCLC without any driver mutations was divided into three distinct groups based on the clinical response to the combination treatment, namely, a group exhibiting partial responses, a group manifesting progressive disease, and a group demonstrating stable disease. The lipid composition of patients in these groups was assessed both before and after treatment.ResultsSignificant differences in lipid composition among the three groups were observed. Further analysis revealed 19 differential lipids, including 2 phosphatidylglycerols and 17 phosphoinositides.ConclusionThis preliminary study aimed to explore the specific impact of anlotinib in combination with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors on lipid metabolism in patients with advanced NSCLC. By investigating the effects of using both anlotinib and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, this study enhances our understanding of lipid metabolism in lung cancer treatment. The findings from this research provide valuable insights into potential therapeutic approaches and the identification of new therapeutic biomarkers.

Real-world evidence of lorlatinib therapy in Taiwanese patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer

BackgroundLorlatinib is a brain-penetrant, third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor indicated for ALK-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In a global phase II study, patients who experience disease progression despite prior treatment with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) was assessed. Herein, we report real-world clinical outcomes of lorlatinib-treated patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC who were heavily pretreated and progressed on first- and second-generation ALK-TKIs, in a Taiwanese population under the lorlatinib expanded access program (EAP). MethodsThis multicenter observational study examined the effectiveness and safety of ALK-positive advanced NSCLC patients that progressed from previous second-generation ALK-TKI therapy and received lorlatinib treatment subsequently. Patients who received lorlatinib treatment under EAP between Jul 2017 and Sep 2019 were eligible. Patients were followed for at least one year from the first lorlatinib treatment until study completion. ResultsSixty-three patients were eligible for safety analysis (male: 46.0 %; median age: 52.8 [27.5–78.3] years; brain metastases: 81.0 %). Fifty-four patients with more than one-month lorlatinib treatment were included in the effectiveness analysis. Prior to lorlatinib treatment, 10 patients (18.5 %) received one ALK-TKI, 27 (50.0 %) received two ALK-TKIs, and 17 (31.5 %) received three or more ALK-TKIs. The overall median rwPFS was 9.2 months (95 % confidence interval: 5.3–21.1). The best overall response rate (n = 51) was 13.7 %, with a disease control rate of 80.4 %. ConclusionLorlatinib exhibits substantial activity and tolerability when used clinically in a later-line setting in a Taiwanese population with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC.

Incidence of venous thromboembolism and association with PD-L1 expression in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with first-line chemo-immunotherapy.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The use of thromboprophylactic therapy is subject to an accurate assessment of the VTE risk depending on patients, tumor characteristics and type of systemic antineoplastic treatments. However, little is known concerning the risk of VTE in patients suffering from an advanced NSCLC treated with first-line chemo-immunotherapy and the impact of tumor biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression. We performed a retrospective, observational, single-centre study in a cohort of advanced NSCLC patients treated with first-line chemo-immunotherapy. The primary endpoint was the incidence of VTE. Secondary endpoints were the cumulative incidence of VTE, the impact of PD-L1 on VTE occurrence, overall survival, the rate of VTE recurrence under anticoagulant treatment and the rate of bleeding complications. 109 patients were included, of whom 21 (19.3%) presented a VTE event during a median follow-up of 13 months. VTE incidence at 3, 6 and 12 months was 12.1%, 15.1% and 17.5% respectively. 61% were pulmonary embolisms, 9.5% were isolated deep vein thrombosis and 14.3% were central venous catheter-related thrombosis. Our study did not show a significant impact of PD-L1 on VTE occurrence. Overall survival at 6, 12 and 24 months was 81.9%, 74.4% and 70.3% respectively. Four patients developed a recurrent VTE under anticoagulation therapy 3 to 5 months after the first VTE event. One patient suffered from a major bleeding complication while under anticoagulation therapy, leading to death. VTE is a common complication in advanced NSCLC patients treated with concomitant chemo-immunotherapy. In our study, 19.3% of patients developed a VTE during a median follow-up of 13 months. PD-L1 did not appear to be associated with VTE occurrence. We recorded high VTE recurrence rates despite anticoagulant treatment. Further investigations are needed to determine if high PD-L1 expression is associated with VTE.

The predictive value of peripheral blood CD4 cells ATP concentration for immune-related adverse events in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients

ObjectiveLung cancer with the highest incidence and mortality in the world. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), can bring long-term survival benefits to patients, but also can bring immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in some patients during therapy. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the predictive effect of peripheral blood WBC, NLR, sATPCD4 and nATPCD4 on irAEs in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsClinical data of 112 patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with PD -1/PD -L1 inhibitor in the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from December 15, 2019 to April 30, 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were divided into the irAEs group (n = 27) and non-irAEs group (n = 85). The clinical data of the two groups were compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to determine the threshold value of baseline peripheral blood parameters to predict the occurrence of irAEs. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to explore the relationship between peripheral blood markers and the incidence of irAEs.ResultsThe patient characteristics have no significant difference between irAEs and non-irAEs group. But the baseline peripheral blood WBC, sATPCD4 and nATPCD4 of patients in the irAEs group were higher than those in the non-irAEs group (p < 0.05), and the NLR in irAEs group was similar to in the non-irAEs group (p = 0.639).Univariate analysis showed that high WBC, sATPCD4 and nATPCD4 may the risk factors for the occurrence of irAEs (p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that high sATPCD4 and nATPCD4 were independent risk factors for the occurrence of irAEs (p < 0.05). The best critical values of WBC, sATPCD4 and nATPCD4 before treatment for predicting the occurrence of irAEs were 8.165 × 109cells/L (AUC = 0.705) ,484.5 ng/mL (AUC = 0.777), and 156 ng/mL (AUC = 0.840), respectively.ConclusionssATPCD4 and nATPCD4 were independent risk factors for the occurrence of irAEs in advanced NSCLC patients. This discovery provides a new method to predict the occurrence of irAEs in patients. Based on the prediction results, corresponding treatment measures can be taken to reduce the incidence of adverse events.

A global phase 3 study of serplulimab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (ASTRUM-004)

Combining immunotherapy with chemotherapy can provide improved survival in advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients without targetable gene alterations. 537 previously untreated patients with stage IIIB/IIIC or IV squamous NSCLC without targetable gene alterations were enrolled and randomized (2:1) to receive serplulimab 4.5mg/kg or placebo, both in combination with nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin, intravenously in 3-week cycles. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) was met at the first interim analysis. At the second interim analysis, PFS benefit was maintained in serplulimab-chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-0.67). At the final analysis, serplulimab-chemotherapy significantly improved median OS compared to placebo-chemotherapy (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.58-0.93; p= 0.010). Grade ≥3 serplulimab or placebo-related adverse events occurred in 126 (35.2%) and 58 (32.4%) patients, respectively. Our results demonstrate that adding serplulimab to chemotherapy significantly improves survival in advanced squamous NSCLC patients, with manageable safety.

Enhancing brain metastasis prediction in non-small cell lung cancer: a deep learning-based segmentation and CT radiomics-based ensemble learning model

BackgroundBrain metastasis (BM) is most common in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. This study aims to enhance BM risk prediction within three years for advanced NSCLC patients by using a deep learning-based segmentation and computed tomography (CT) radiomics-based ensemble learning model.MethodsThis retrospective study included 602 stage IIIA-IVB NSCLC patients, 309 BM patients and 293 non-BM patients, from two centers. Patients were divided into a training cohort (N = 376), an internal validation cohort (N = 161) and an external validation cohort (N = 65). Lung tumors were first segmented by using a three-dimensional (3D) deep residual U-Net network. Then, a total of 1106 radiomics features were computed by using pretreatment lung CT images to decode the imaging phenotypes of primary lung cancer. To reduce the dimensionality of the radiomics features, recursive feature elimination configured with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regularization method was applied to select the optimal image features after removing the low-variance features. An ensemble learning algorithm of the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) classifier was used to train and build a prediction model by fusing radiomics features and clinical features. Finally, Kaplan‒Meier (KM) survival analysis was used to evaluate the prognostic value of the prediction score generated by the radiomics–clinical model.ResultsThe fused model achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.91 ± 0.01, 0.89 ± 0.02 and 0.85 ± 0.05 on the training and two validation cohorts, respectively. Through KM survival analysis, the risk score generated by our model achieved a significant prognostic value for BM-free survival (BMFS) and overall survival (OS) in the two cohorts (P < 0.05).ConclusionsOur results demonstrated that (1) the fusion of radiomics and clinical features can improve the prediction performance in predicting BM risk, (2) the radiomics model generates higher performance than the clinical model, and (3) the radiomics-clinical fusion model has prognostic value in predicting the BMFS and OS of NSCLC patients.

Predictors of Response to Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study

Introduction: Lung cancer carries the highest cancer-related mortality rates worldwide. Despite all recent advances, the mortality from lung cancer is still rising. A better understanding of the risk factors may help us predict responses to chemotherapy for better management. Aim: To evaluate predictors of response to chemotherapy in advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective cohort study conducted in the Department of Pulmonary Medicine at Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India. A total of 60 confirmed cases of advanced (stage IIIB and IV) NSCLC patients were enrolled consecutively for a duration of two years. Baseline clinical parameters, routine blood tests, spirometry, exercise capacity using the 6 Minute Walk Test Distance (6MWTD), and Computed Tomography (CT)-based tumour size were recorded. Certain pre-defined patient, disease, and therapy-related factors (age, gender, dyspnoea, baseline blood tests, tumour size, histology, etc.) were evaluated for their possible role as predictors of treatment response in advanced NSCLC patients. A positive response was defined if the response to chemotherapy was Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR), and a negative response if the response was Progressive Disease (PD) or Stable Disease (SD) as per revised RECIST (Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors) 1.1 criteria. Variables between the two groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square test. To find out the factors that may predict response to treatment, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used. Results: Out of a total of 60 confirmed cases of NSCLC patients, only 40 patients were able to complete the four cycles of chemotherapy. The mean age of the patients was 58.5±9.6 years. There were a total of 35 males (87.5%) and five females (12.5%) in the study. Out of 40 patients, 27 (67.5%) had squamous cell carcinoma and 13 (32.5%) had adenocarcinoma. On univariate analysis, Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) had a statistically significant association with tumour response (p&lt;0.001). On multivariate analysis, advanced age (p=0.05) and high (&gt;3.81) NLR (p=0.002) were found as independent predictors of poor response to chemotherapy. Conclusion: Pre-treatment high NLR and advanced age are significant factors for a poor response to chemotherapy treatment in advanced NSCLC patients.

A Randomized, Multi-Center, Open Label Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy between Afatinib Monotherapy and Combination Therapy with HAD-B1 for the Locally Advanced or Metastatic NSCLC Patients with EGFR Mutations.

Lung cancer, especially non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), poses a significant health challenge globally due to its high mortality. Afatinib, a second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), has shown superior efficacy over traditional chemotherapy in NSCLC treatment. However, issues like secondary resistance and adverse effects call for alternative therapies. HAD-B1, comprising 4 herbal medicines, has shown promise in lung cancer treatment in both preclinical and clinical settings. This study assesses the combination of HAD-B1 and Afatinib in advanced NSCLC patients to potentially improve outcomes by addressing the limitations of current EGFR-TKI therapies. A randomized, open-label trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of HAD-B1 with Afatinib in 90 EGFR-mutation-positive NSCLC patients. Participants were divided into treatment and control groups, receiving Afatinib with or without HAD-B1. The study focused on the initial dose maintenance rate and disease control rate (DCR) of Afatinib, alongside secondary outcomes like survival rates and quality of life, under continuous safety monitoring. Among the 90 participants, no significant difference was found in initial dose maintenance (60.98% in the treatment group vs 52.50% in the control, P = .4414) or DCR (80.49% vs 90.00%, P = .2283). Secondary outcomes like PFS, TTP, and OS showed no notable differences. However, physical functioning significantly improved in the treatment group (P = .0475, PPS group). The control group experienced higher rates of adverse events of special interest and adverse drug reactions (P = .01), suggesting HAD-B1 with Afatinib might enhance physical function without increasing adverse effects. Combining HAD-B1 with Afatinib potentially improves quality of life and reduces adverse events in advanced NSCLC patients. Further research is necessary to confirm the long-term benefits of this combination therapy, aiming to advance NSCLC treatment outcomes. Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) of the Republic of Korea, https://cris.nih.go.kr/ (ID: KCT0005414).

Differences in Genomic Alterations and Accumulations of Heavy Metals Between Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with and without Bone Metastasis.

Purpose: Bone metastasis (BoM) has been closely associated with increased morbidity and poor survival outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Given its significant implications, this study aimed to systematically compare the biological characteristics between advanced NSCLC patients with and without BoM. Methods: In this study, the genomic alterations from the tumor tissue DNA of 42 advanced NSCLC patients without BoM and 67 patients with BoM and were analyzed by a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel. The serum concentrations of 18 heavy metals were detected by inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry (ICP-MS). Results: A total of 157 somatic mutations across 18 mutated genes and 105 somatic mutations spanning 16 mutant genes were identified in 61 out of 67 (91.05%) patients with BoM and 37 of 42 (88.10%) patients without BoM, respectively. Among these mutated genes, NTRK1, FGFR1, ERBB4, NTRK3, and FGFR2 stood out exclusively in patients with BoM, whereas BRAF, GNAS, and AKT1 manifested solely in those without BoM. Moreover, both co-occurring sets of genes and mutually exclusive sets of genes in patients with BoM were different from those in patients without BoM. In addition, the serum concentrations of Cu and Sr in patients with BoM were significantly higher than in patients without BoM. One of our aims was to explore how these heavy metals associated with BoM interacted with other heavy metals, and significant positive correlations were observed between Cu and Co, between Cu and Cr, between Sr and Ba, and between Sr and Ni in patients with BoM. Given the significant impacts of molecular characteristics on patients' prognosis, we also observed a noteworthy negative correlation between EGFR mutations and Co, alongside a significant positive correlation between TP53 mutations and Cd. Conclusions: The genomic alterations, somatic interactions, key signaling pathways, functional biological information, and accumulations of serum heavy metals were markedly different between advanced NSCLC patients with and without BoM, and certain heavy metals (e.g., Cu, Sr) might have potentials to identify high-risk patients with BoM.

Plasma ddPCR for the detection of MET amplification in advanced NSCLC patients: a comparative real-world study

Background: Mesenchymal–epithelial transition ( MET) amplification is a crucial oncogenic driver and a resistance mechanism to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the gold standard for MET amplification detection. However, it is inapplicable when tissue samples are unavailable. Objective: This study assessed the performance of plasma droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) in MET amplification detection in NSCLC patients. Design and methods: A total of 87 NSCLC patients were enrolled, and 94 paired tissue and plasma samples were analyzed for the concordance between FISH and plasma ddPCR/tissue next-generation sequencing (NGS) in detecting MET amplification. In addition, the efficacy of patients with MET amplification using different detection methods who were treated with MET-TKIs was evaluated. Results: Plasma ddPCR showed substantial concordance with FISH (74.1% sensitivity, 92.5% specificity, and 87.2% accuracy with a kappa value of 0.68) and outperformed tissue NGS (kappa value of 0.64) in MET amplification detection. Combined plasma ddPCR and tissue NGS showed substantial concordance with FISH (92.3% sensitivity, 89.2% specificity, and an accuracy of 90.1% with a kappa value of 0.77). The efficacy is comparable in these NSCLC patients with MET amplification detected by FISH and plasma ddPCR who were treated with MET-TKIs. Conclusion: Plasma ddPCR is a potentially reliable method for detecting MET amplification in advanced NSCLC patients. Combined plasma ddPCR and tissue NGS might be an alternative or complementary method to MET amplification detection.

Predictive Value of NLR and PLR in Driver-Gene-Negative Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors: A Single Institutional Cohort Study.

To investigate the predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) for the efficacy and prognosis of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in driver-gene-negative advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A retrospective analysis of 107 advanced NSCLC patients without gene mutations who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in our hospital from January 2020 to June 2022 was performed. NLR and PLR were collected before PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, the optimal cut-off values of NLR and PLR were determined according to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the effects of NLR and PLR on the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in advanced NSCLC patients were analyzed. A total of 107 patients were included in this study. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the optimal cut-off values of NLR and PLR were 3.825, 179, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curve showed that low baseline levels NLR and PLR were associated with an improvement in both progression-free survival (PFS) (P < .001, < .001, respectively) and overall survival (OS) (P = .009, .006, respectively). In first-line treatment and non-first-line treatment, low baseline levels NLR and PLR were associated with an improvement in PFS. In multivariate analysis, low baseline NLR and PLR showed a strong association with both better PFS (P = .011, .027, respectively) and longer OS (P = .042, .039, respectively). Low baseline NLR and PLR levels are significantly associated with better response in advanced NSCLC patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, which may be indicators to predict the efficacy of immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC with driver-gene-negative.

Evaluating the Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Exon 20 Insertions.

Epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertion (EGFR ex20ins), an uncommon mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), can induce poor patient response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI). However, the clinical features and prognosis of patients with EGFR ex20ins are not clearly understood. This study investigated the clinical characteristics and prognosis of advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR ex20ins. Advanced NSCLC patients treated at Fujian Cancer Hospital were consecutively recruited from June 1, 2014 to December 20, 2021 and retrospectively examined. EGFR ex20ins was identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or next-generation sequencing (NGS). The clinical characteristics, treatment methods, and patient outcomes were retrieved from the hospital database. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Fourteen mutation subtypes of EGFR ex20ins were identified in the 24 enrolled patients, with EGFR ex20ins mutation more prevalent in non-smoking women. A763_Y764insFQEA and A767_V769dup (12.5% for both) were the most common mutation subtypes. Notably, no significant differences in PFS and OS were found between the first-line targeted therapy group [PFS: 257 days, 95% confidence interval (CI): 116-397 days; OS: not reached] and chemotherapy-based combination therapy group (PFS: 182 days, 95% CI: 156-207 days; OS: 998 days, 95% CI: 674-1321 days). TP53 mutation was the commonest concomitant mutation (62%), followed by EGFR amplification (25%). Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy improved the prognosis of patients with high PD-L1 expression. For NSCLC patients with EGFR ex20ins, limited therapeutic benefits can be gleaned from either EGFR-TKIs or chemotherapy-based combination therapy.

A pooled analysis of clinical outcome in driver-gene negative non-small cell lung cancer patients with MET overexpression treated with gumarontinib.

MET overexpression represents the most MET aberration in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, except MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping mutation was recognized as a clinical biomarker, the role of MET overexpression as a predictive factor to MET inhibitor is not clear. The purpose of the pooled analysis is to explore the safety and efficiency of gumarontinib, a highly selective oral MET inhibitor, in drive-gene negative NSCLC patients with MET overexpression. NSCLC patients with MET overexpression [immunohistochemistry (IHC) ⩾3+ as determined by central laboratory] not carrying epidermal growth factor receptor mutation, METex14 skipping mutation or other known drive gene alternations who received Gumarontinib 300 mg QD from two single arm studies were selected and pooled for the analysis. The efficacy [objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)] and safety [treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE), treatment related AE (TRAE) and serious AE (SAE) were assessed. A total of 32 patients with MET overexpression were included in the analysis, including 12 treatment naïve patients who refused or were unsuitable for chemotherapy, and 20 pre-treated patients who received ⩾1 lines of prior systemic anti-tumour therapies. Overall, the ORR was 37.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 21.1-56.3%], the DCR was 81.3% (95% CI: 63.6-92.8%), median PFS (mPFS) and median OS (mOS) were 6.9 month (95% CI: 3.6-9.7) and 17.0 month (95% CI: 10.3-not evaluable), respectively. The most common AEs were oedema (59.4%), hypoalbuminaemia (40.6%), alanine aminotransferase increased (31.3%). Gumarontinib showed promising antitumour activity in driver-gene negative locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with MET overexpression, which warranted a further clinical trial. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03457532; NCT04270591.

Efficacy and Safety Assessment of Intrathoracic Perfusion Chemotherapy Combined with immunological factor Interleukin-2 in the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the gemcitabine and oxaliplatin intrathoracic perfusion chemotherapy (IPCGOR) regimen combined with interleukin-2 (IL-2) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 460 advanced NSCLC patients from the Yunnan Province Early Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Project (June 2020-October 2022), assessing the IPCGOR and IL-2 combination. Outcomes were measured based on RECIST 1.1 criteria, focusing on objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (MOS), and treatment safety. Results: The treatment demonstrated an ORR of 67.4%, a DCR of 97.4%, an mPFS of 8.5 months, and an MOS of 12.5 months. 14 patients underwent successful surgery post-treatment. Common adverse reactions were manageable, with no treatment-related deaths reported. Conclusion: The IPCGOR combined with IL-2 regimen shows promising efficacy and a tolerable safety profile for advanced NSCLC. These findings suggest its potential as a reference for treating advanced NSCLC. However, the study's retrospective nature and single-center design pose limitations. Future research should focus on prospective studies, randomized controlled trials, and long-term outcome assessments, particularly in diverse patient subgroups, to further validate and refine the clinical application of this regimen.

Prognostic nomogram based on pre-treatment HALP score for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BackgroundTo explore the correlation of pre-treatment Hemoglobin-Albumin-Lymphocyte-Platelet (HALP) score with the prognosis of patients with advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) undergoing first-line conventional platinum-based chemotherapy. MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, 203 patients with advanced NSCLC were recruited from January 2017 to December 2021. The cut-off value for the HALP score was determined by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The baseline characteristics and blood parameters were recorded, and the Log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier curves were applied for the survival analysis. In the univariate and multivariate analyses, the Cox regression analysis was carried out. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomogram were determined by the Concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve and compared with a single HALP score by ROC curve analysis. ResultsThe optimal cut-off value for the HALP score was 28.02. The lower HALP score was closely associated with poorer Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS). The male gender and other pathological types were associated with shorter OS. Disease progression and low HALP were correlated with shorter OS and PFS. In addition, nomograms were established based on HALP scores, gender, pathology type and efficacy rating, and used to predict OS. The C-index for OS prediction was 0.7036 (95% CI 0.643 to 0.7643), which was significantly higher than the C-index of HALP at 6-, 12-, and 24-months. ConclusionThe HALP score is associated with the prognosis of advanced NSCLC patients receiving conventional platinum-based chemotherapy, and the nomogram established based on the HALP score has a better predictive capability for OS.

Comparison of osimertinib plus bevacizumab against osimertinib alone in NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Frequent failures observed in some trials comparing the efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus bevacizumab to osimertinib monotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) alterations have brought questions. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of these two treatment regimens in advanced NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases were extensively searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on 14 May 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature, assessed quality, and extracted data. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR). The secondary outcomes were adverse events (AEs) and PFS stratified by patients' characteristics. STATA 17.0 software (StataCorp LLC, USA) was adopted for meta-analysis. A total of four RCTs involving 390 patients were included. Overall, the risk of bias across the studies was moderate to low. Pooled results showed that compared to osimertinib alone, the addition of bevacizumab to osimertinib failed to show prolongation of PFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-1.27], OS (HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.73-1.41), or improvement of the ORR (risk ratio = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.90-1.38), while an increased incidence of some AEs was observed, such as nausea, oral mucositis, hypertension, and proteinuria. Notably, combination treatment did significantly prolong the PFS in the subset of smokers (HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44-0.94). A mild trend toward PFS benefit under the combined regimen was also noted in patients with brain metastases and first-line treatment, though not reaching statistical significance. Based on the available evidence, the addition of bevacizumab to osimertinib could not provide additional survival benefits with higher but manageable toxicity for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. Osimertinib monotherapy remains the prioritized treatment. Further investigation is warranted.

The Efficiency and Safety of Triple-Drug Combination of Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel, Anlotinib and PD-1/L1 Inhibitors in the 2nd or Above Line of Advanced NSCLC: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Existing research data indicates that albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-ptx), anlotinib, and PD-1/L1 inhibitors have individually shown efficacy in second-line and subsequent treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study seeks to investigate the potential of an optimized treatment regimen in this context by combining these three drugs and evaluating both efficacy and safety outcomes. Between January 2020 and January 2022, we collected data from pre-treated advanced NSCLC patients who received a combination therapy of nab-ptx, anlotinib, and PD-1/L1 inhibitors as a second-line or later treatment. The primary endpoints for the study included the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR) and overall survival (OS), while adverse events (AEs) were also recorded. Our findings revealed that the ORR of this regimen in pretreated NSCLC patients was 35.71%, with mean PFS of 5.0 months and mean OS of 10.0 months. Further analysis suggested correlations between the efficacy of the regimen and factors such as PD-L1 expression levels, the occurrence of certain types of adverse events, and the status of NK cell activity. Additionally, the tolerable toxicity profile of this regimen indicates its potential applicability in the treatment of pretreated advanced NSCLC. Our study displayed that triple-drug combination of nab-ptx, anlotinib and PD-1/L1 inhibitors showed promising efficiency and tolerated cytotoxicity in the 2nd or above line treatment of advanced NSCLC, indicating the potential of such regimen as an important option for second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. However, due to limitations in patient numbers, its actual clinical value awaits further research confirmation.

Cinobufotalin effect and mechanism on serum MMP-2, MMP-9, Beclin1, LC3-II in advanced NSCLC patients.

This study was conducted to explore cinobufotalin's effects and related mechanisms on serum MMP-2, MMP-9, Beclin1, and LC3-II in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. For this purpose, 150 patients with advanced NSCLC in our hospital from Jan. 2020 to Feb. 2022 were chosen as participants in the research study. Using a random number table method, the 150 patients were divided evenly into two groups - a control group (C) and an observation group (O). Group C received conventional NP regimen chemotherapy, while Group O received cinobufotalin capsules based on the control group. The follow-up was conducted for 4 months, and the differences in serum MMP-2, MMP-9, Beclin1, LC3-II and chemotherapy resistance rates were compared. Results showed that There was no statistically significant difference in MMP-2, MMP-9, Beclin1, and LC3-II levels between the two before treatment (P>0.05); 4 months later, Group O's MMP-2, MMP-9, Beclin1, and LC3-II levels were lower than those before treatment and Group C during the same period, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05); At 4 months after treatment, the clinical efficacy of Group O was better and its ORR was higher, with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05); Using Pearson correlation analysis, a weak positive correlation was identified between MMP-2, Beclin1, LC3-II, and chemotherapy resistance (r=0.167, 0.197, 0.273, P<0.05), a positive correlation between MMP-2 and MMP-9, Beclin1, LC3-II (r=0.592, 0.852, 0.665, P<0.01), a positive correlation between MMP-9 and Beclin1, LC3-II (r=0.552, 0.472, P<0.01), and a positive correlation between Beclin1 and LC3-II (r=0.647, P<0.01). It was concluded that cinobufotalin has an inhibitory effect on the serum MMP-2, MMP-9, Beclin1, and LC3-II levels in advanced NSCLC patients, which can promote clinical efficacy improvement and reduce the risk of chemotherapy resistance by downregulating MMP-2, Beclin1, and LC3-II levels.