Advanced Melanoma Research Articles

An Automated Real-Time PCR Assay versus Next-Generation Sequencing in the Detection of BRAF V600 Mutations in Melanoma Tissue Samples.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is the most commonly used method for determining BRAF mutational status in patients with advanced melanoma. Automated PCR-based methods, such as the IdyllaTM system, are increasingly used for mutation diagnostics, but it is unclear what impact the choice of diagnostic method has on the management of melanoma. To compare the concordance rate of BRAF V600 mutational analysis using IdyllaTM and NGS and to analyze the technical and clinical turnaround time. The clinical relevance is compared by analyzing the impact on the treatment decision. In this monocentric prospective cohort study, the BRAF mutation status of 51 patients was determined using both methods in parallel. BRAF V600 mutation was detected in 23/51 cases (45%). IdyllaTM showed a 100% concordant result with a faster turnaround time (0.2 days) compared to NGS (12.2 days). In general, less tumor material was required for IdyllaTM than for NGS. Most patients received immunotherapy as a first-line therapy regardless of the BRAF V600 status. IdyllaTM testing proved to be a reliable and rapid alternative to NGS in the determination of BRAF V600 mutation. Although BRAF. status was available earlier, this had no influence on the treatment decision in most cases.

Causes of death and patterns of metastatic disease at the end of life for patients with advanced melanoma in the immunotherapy era.

Despite remarkable advances in immunotherapy, melanoma remains a significant cause of cancer mortality. Many factors concerning melanoma mortality are poorly understood, posing an obstacle to optimal care. We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of 183 patients with metastatic melanoma who died following immunotherapy treatment to investigate sites of metastases at death, settings of death, and mechanisms of death. The median time from metastatic diagnosis to death was 16.1 months (range 0.3-135.1 months). Most patients experienced hospitalization within 3 months before death (80.3%), with 31.7% dying while hospitalized, 31.2% while in inpatient hospice, and 29.4% while in home hospice. The most common sites of metastases at death were distant lymph nodes (62.8%), lung (57.9%), liver (50.8%), brain (38.8%), and bone (37.7%). The most common causes of death were progressive failure to thrive (57.5%), respiratory failure (22.4%), and infection (21.8%); the vast majority (87.9%) of patients died from melanoma-specific causes. Overall, 10.9% of patients in our cohort had survival >5 years after metastatic diagnosis, and 76.2% of long-term survivors died due to melanoma. This study describes factors associated with melanoma mortality, highlighting an ongoing need for therapeutic advancements.

Cutaneous Adverse Reactions and Survival Outcomes of Advanced Melanoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in an Academic Medical Centre in Singapore.

Programmed cell death-1 (PD1) inhibitors, a form of immune checkpoint inhibitor, are efficacious for metastatic melanoma but are associated with cutaneous adverse reactions (CARs). Studies in Europe and North America showed that CARs are associated with an increased overall survival. However, studies from Asia showed mixed results. There is a paucity of data regarding the efficacy of PD1 inhibitors and the effect of CARs on overall survival from Southeast Asia. A retrospective study of patients in the National Cancer Centre Singapore who were diagnosed with melanoma between 2015 and 2020 was conducted. Patients were included in the study if they had stage IV melanoma (advanced melanoma). Sixty-two patients were included in the study. The median age was 62.5 years and acral melanoma was the commonest subtype. Forty-three patients received PD1 inhibitors. Comparing patients who did not receive PD1 inhibitors to patients who received PD1 inhibitors, the former had a median overall survival of 6 months (95% CI: 5.07, 6.93), whereas the latter had a median overall survival of 21 months (95% CI: 13.33, 28.67; p < 0.001) (Hazard ratio 0.32; 95% CI: 0.16, 0.63; p = 0.001). Amongst patients who received PD1 inhibitors, patients who developed CARs had a greater median overall survival of 33 months (95% CI: 17.27, 48.73) compared to 15 months (95% CI: 9.20, 20.80; p = 0.013) for patients who did not (HR 0.29; 95% CI: 0.098, 0.834; p = 0.022). This study provides insight into the outcomes of metastatic melanoma in Singapore, and adds to the body of evidence supporting the use of PD1 inhibitors in Asians.

Combination of oncolytic Maraba virus with immune checkpoint blockade overcomes therapy resistance in an immunologically cold model of advanced melanoma with dysfunctional T-cell receptor signalling

BackgroundOver the past decade, cancer immunotherapies have revolutionized the treatment of melanoma; however, responses vary across patient populations. Recently, baseline tumor size has been identified as an independent prognostic factor...

Photothermal therapy improves the efficacy of topical immunotherapy against melanoma

BackgroundMelanoma is an aggressive cancer with poor response to traditional therapies. A combination of photothermal therapy and topical immunotherapy may enhance elimination of melanoma.. Materials and methodsC57BL/6 mice with early stage and metastatic melanoma were treated with laser immunotherapy (LIT), combining near-infrared laser-based photothermal therapy (PTT) and topical imiquimod (IMQ)-based immunotherapy. The volume of primary and abscopal melanoma, animal survival, tissue temperature, transcriptome, and immune cell response were investigated to evaluate the effect of LIT. ResultsLIT could eliminate primary tumors, inhibite abscopal tumors, and prolong animal survival. The tumor tissues were selectively destroyed under a photothermal gradient between 38.2 ± 3.7 °C and 73.0 ± 2.3 °C. Gene expression analysis showed a significant increase in the expression of damage associated molecular patterns. Additionally, the population of mature dendritic cells, CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells were increased, while myeloid-derived suppressor cells were downregulated after LIT. ConclusionThe study showed that LIT inhibited the growth of both primary and abscopal melanoma by activating systemic antitumor immune responses and reversing the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, making LIT a potential method for advanced melanoma treatment.

Re-Treatment With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

We did not find any evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness and safety of second re-treatment with pembrolizumab for non–small cell lung cancer, classical Hodgkin lymphoma, and advanced melanoma. We did not find any evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness and safety of second re-treatment with cemiplimab for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. We did not find any evidence-based guidelines regarding the second re-treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors for non–small cell lung cancer, classical Hodgkin lymphoma, advanced melanoma, and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Tunlametinib: First Approval.

Tunlametinib (®) is an oral, selective, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 and 2 (MEK 1/2) inhibitor being developed by Shanghai KeChow Pharma, Inc. for the treatment of solid tumours with RAS and RAF mutations, including melanoma, non-small cell cancer (NSCLC), colorectal cancer (CRC) and neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) plexiform neurofibromas. In March 2024, tunlametinib was granted conditional approval in China (based on surrogate endpoints) for use in patients with NRAS-mutated advanced melanoma who have failed anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of tunlametinib leading to this first approval for the treatment of solid tumours with RAS and RAF mutations.

Recent advances in immunotherapy and its combination therapies for advanced melanoma: a review.

The incidence of melanoma is increasing year by year and is highly malignant, with a poor prognosis. Its treatment has always attracted much attention. Among the more clinically applied immunotherapies are immune checkpoint inhibitors, bispecific antibodies, cancer vaccines, adoptive cell transfer therapy, and oncolytic virotherapy. With the continuous development of technology and trials, in addition to immune monotherapy, combinations of immunotherapy and radiotherapy have shown surprising efficacy. In this article, we review the research progress of immune monotherapy and combination therapy for advanced melanoma, with the aim of providing new ideas for the treatment strategy for advanced melanoma.

Immune mediated support of metastasis: Implication for bone invasion.

Bone is a common organ affected by metastasis in various advanced cancers, including lung, breast, prostate, colorectal, and melanoma. Once a patient is diagnosed with bone metastasis, the patient's quality of life and overall survival are significantly reduced owing to a wide range of morbidities and the increasing difficulty of treatment. Many studies have shown that bone metastasis is closely related to bone microenvironment, especially bone immune microenvironment. However, the effects of various immune cells in the bone microenvironment on bone metastasis remain unclear. Here, we described the changes in various immune cells during bone metastasis and discussed their related mechanisms. Osteoblasts, adipocytes, and other non-immune cells closely related to bone metastasis were also included. This review also summarized the existing treatment methods and potential therapeutic targets, and provided insights for future studies of cancer bone metastasis.

Changes in mucosa‑associated lymphoid tissue 1 predicts therapeutic response and survival in patients with advanced melanoma receiving programmed cell death‑1 inhibitor monotherapy.

Advanced melanoma is an aggressive and dangerous form of skin cancer, and programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors are recommended treatment options for patients with advanced melanoma. Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue 1 (MALT1) impairs CD8+ T-cell activation to induce immune escape, leading to a reduction in the antitumor effect of PD-1 inhibitors. The present study aimed to assess the prognostic implication of MALT1 in patients with advanced melanoma receiving PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy. Blood MALT1 levels were assessed using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR in 20 healthy controls (HCs) after enrollment and in 49 patients with advanced melanoma before (T0), as well as 2 months (T1) and 4 months after (T2) PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy. The maximum level of MALT1 in HCs (3.100) was used as the cut-off in patients with advanced melanoma. MALT1 levels at T0 were significantly increased in patients with advanced melanoma compared with in HCs (P<0.001). In patients with advanced melanoma, MALT1 was significantly decreased from T0 to T2 (P<0.001). Objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 28.6 and 59.2%, respectively. MALT1 levels at T1 were significantly negatively associated with overall therapeutic response (P=0.001), ORR (P=0.009) and DCR (P=0.004). MALT1 levels at T2 were significantly inversely associated with overall therapeutic response (P=0.021) and ORR (P=0.036). Moreover, MALT1 levels >3.100 at T0 (P=0.027) and T1 (P=0.045) were significantly associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS), and MALT1 levels >3.100 at T1 were significantly associated with a poor overall survival (OS; P=0.022). Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that MALT1 levels at T0 (>3.100 vs. ≤3.100) were significantly associated with a poor PFS [hazard ratio (HR)=2.248; P=0.037], and MALT1 levels at T1 (>3.100 vs. ≤3.100) were significantly associated with a poor OS (HR=4.332; P=0.007). In conclusion, MALT1 levels are reduced following PD-1 treatment, and a high MALT1 level is associated with a poor therapeutic response and shorter survival in patients with advanced melanoma receiving PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy.

Analytical quality by design (AQbD) based optimization of RP-UPLC method for determination of nivolumab and relatlimab in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage forms

BackgroundThe Analytical Quality by Design (AQbD) methodology extends the application of Quality by Design (QbD) principles to the management of the analytical procedure life cycle, encompassing method creation, optimization, validation, and continuous improvement. AQbD assists in creating analytical procedures that are robust, reliable, precise, and cost-efficient. Opdualag™ is a combination of Nivolumab and Relatlimab, which are antibodies that block programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) and lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) receptors, used to treat advanced melanoma. This work aims to develop and validate a reversed-phase ultra-performance liquid chromatography (RP-UPLC) method using AQbD principles to determine NLB and RTB in pharmaceutical products.ResultsA central composite design (CCD) comprising three factors arranged in five distinct levels was implemented via Design-expert® software to optimize the chromatographic conditions. A mathematical model was constructed and the effects of three independent factors namely flow rate (X1), percentage of methanol in the mobile phase (X2), and temperature (X3) on responses including retention time (Y1–2), resolution factor (Y3), theoretical plates (Y4–5), and tailing factor (Y6–7) were investigated. The software determined the optimal chromatographic conditions for the separation of NLB and RTB, which were as follows: 32.80% methanol in the mobile phase, 0.272 mL/min flow rate, 29.42 °C column temperature, and 260 nm UV detection. The retention time for NLB and RTB were 1.46 and 1.88 min, respectively. The method exhibited linearity across the concentration ranges of 4–24 µg/mL for RTB and 12–72 µg/mL for NLB. The limits of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) for NLB and RTB, respectively, were 0.89 µg/mL, 2.69 µg/mL and 0.15 µg/mL and 0.46 µg/mL. The percentage relative standard deviation (%RSD) of intraday and interday precision for NLB and RTB was below 2. The recovery percentages for NLB and RTB were determined to be 99.57–100.43% and 99.59–100.61%, respectively. Both drugs were found to be susceptible to oxidative and photolytic degradation in forced degradation studies.ConclusionsEmploying the AQbD-based methodology, a straightforward, fast, accurate, precise, specific, and stability-indicating RP-UPLC method has been established for the quantitative analysis of NLB and its RTB in pharmaceutical formulations.

Tumor-Localized Interleukin-2 and Interleukin-12 Combine with Radiation Therapy to Safely Potentiate Regression of Advanced Malignant Melanoma in Pet Dogs.

Cytokines IL2 and IL12 exhibit potent anticancer activity but suffer a narrow therapeutic window due to off-tumor immune cell activation. Engineering cytokines with the ability to bind and associate with tumor collagen after intratumoral injection potentiated response without toxicity in mice and was previously safe in pet dogs with sarcoma. Here, we sought to test the efficacy of this approach in dogs with advanced melanoma. This study examined 15 client-owned dogs with histologically or cytologically confirmed malignant melanoma that received a single 9-Gy fraction of radiotherapy, followed by six cycles of combined collagen-anchored IL2 and IL12 therapy every 2 weeks. Cytokine dosing followed a 3 + 3 dose escalation design, with the initial cytokine dose chosen from prior evaluation in canine sarcomas. No exclusion criteria for tumor stage or metastatic burden, age, weight, or neuter status were applied for this trial. Median survival regardless of the tumor stage or dose level was 256 days, and 10/13 (76.9%) dogs that completed treatment had CT-measured tumor regression at the treated lesion. In dogs with metastatic disease, 8/13 (61.5%) had partial responses across their combined lesions, which is evidence of locoregional response. Profiling by NanoString of treatment-resistant dogs revealed that B2m loss was predictive of poor response to this therapy. Collectively, these results confirm the ability of locally administered tumor-anchored cytokines to potentiate responses at regional disease sites when combined with radiation. This evidence supports the clinical translation of this approach and highlights the utility of comparative investigation in canine cancers.

Where Are We Now with Oncolytic Viruses in Melanoma and Nonmelanoma Skin Malignancies?

Skin cancer prognosis has greatly improved recently due to the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, many patients with advanced skin cancer still experience immunotherapy resistance and disease progression during ICI treatment, thus calling for novel therapeutics which address this treatment gap. Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) has gained popularity in recent years as a viable treatment option for patients with skin cancer. In preclinical studies, T-VEC demonstrated both a direct anti-tumor effect in injected lesions as well as a systemic immune-mediated effect in non-injected lesions, which could pose additional benefits when combined with ICI therapy. Following promising results from the OPTiM trial, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the usage of T-VEC as a single agent in advanced melanoma. However, the MASTERKEY-265 trial demonstrated that adding T-VEC to pembrolizumab did not offer additional clinical benefit in patients with melanoma. Nevertheless, the promising efficacy of T-VEC and its approval by the FDA helped oncolytic viruses (OVs) gain wide attention in cancer therapy, and extensive research has been undertaken to evaluate the usage of OVs in other tumors such as sarcomas and breast cancers. Here, we provide a review of clinical results from 2022 to 2024 that investigate the efficacy and safety of OVs as a monotherapy or in combination with other therapies in skin malignancies. Furthermore, we delineate the current limitations in OV utilization and outline future directions to enhance clinical outcomes for patients with skin malignancies receiving OV-based therapies.

Learning About and Living With Toxicity: A Qualitative Study of Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors For Melanoma or Lung Cancer and Their Caregivers.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized treatment for melanoma and lung cancer and are in widespread use. This study aims to describe how patients and caregivers learn about ICI toxicities and their perceptions and experiences of toxicity. We conducted a qualitative study of 42 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; n = 16) or melanoma (n = 26) who were initiating or discontinuing an ICI and their caregivers (n = 9). We conducted in-depth interviews to explore patients' and caregivers' experiences learning about and living with ICI side effects. We audio-recorded the first oncology visit after enrollment. We used a framework approach to code interview and visit transcripts and synthesized codes into themes. The median age of patients was 67; 68% were male. Themes of participant interviews and clinician-patient dialogue included: i) Patients initiating an ICI received extensive information about side effects, which some patients found overwhelming or scary and difficult to absorb; ii) Patients who were deterred by fear of toxicity ultimately proceeded with treatment because of oncologist encouragement or the sense of no alternative; iii) participants found hope in the association between toxicity and ICI efficacy; iv) caregivers helped patients navigate the deluge of information and uncertainty related to ICIs. Participants suggested ways to improve ICI side effect education, such as incorporating patient stories. Patients perceived that ICI toxicity counseling was overwhelming yet were encouraged by oncologists' reassurance that serious side effects were manageable and by the framing of toxicity as a sign of efficacy. We identified opportunities to improve communication of ICI risks and benefits.

Real-world outcomes of combined lenvatinib and anti-PD-1 in advanced melanoma: the Lenvamel study, a multicenter retrospective study of the French Group of Skin Cancers (Groupe de Cancérologie Cutanée).

Currently, treatment options for patients with advanced melanoma who experience failed immunotherapy or targeted therapy are lacking. Recent studies suggest the antitumor activity of combined pembrolizumab and lenvatinib in patients with advanced melanoma progressing on immunotherapy. Herein, we report the clinical outcomes of combined lenvatinib and a programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitor (PD-1) in this population. This French multicenter real-world study was conducted between September 2020 and July 2023. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (version 1.1). Secondary variables were treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and duration of response (DOR). Of the 67 patients included (median age, 69 years; median follow-up, 5.0 months), 85% had stage IV-M1c or M1d disease. The overall ORR was 28.4% (95% CI, 18%-41%), including 3 complete (4.5%) and 16 partial (23.9%) responses. Median DOR was 3.1 (interquartile range, 1.3-4.3) months. Median PFS and OS were 3.1 (95% CI, 2.5-3.7) and 9.8 (95% CI, 5.6-13.9) months, respectively. Grades 3-5 TRAEs occurred in 16 (24%) patients; common TRAEs were fatigue (43.3%), nausea/vomiting (26.8%), diarrhea (20.9%), and hypertension (20.9%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Our real-world study demonstrates an interesting response rate and acceptable safety profile in a population with poor prognostic factors. Our data support this treatment option for refractory melanoma, as it is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration or European Medicines Agency, and highlight the need for new strategies.

Interfering with aggregated α-synuclein in advanced melanoma leads to a major upregulation of MHC class II proteins.

Melanoma is the most serious and deadly form of skin cancer and with progression to advanced melanoma, the intrinsically disordered protein α-synuclein is upregulated to high levels. While toxic to dopaminergic neurons in Parkinson's disease, α-synuclein is highly beneficial for primary and metastatic melanoma cells. To gain detailed insights into this exact opposite role of α-synuclein in advanced melanoma, we performed proteomic studies of high-level α-synuclein-expressing human melanoma cell lines that were treated with the diphenyl-pyrazole small-molecule compound anle138b, which binds to and interferes with the oligomeric structure of α-synuclein. We also performed proteomic and transcriptomic studies of human melanoma xenografts that were treated systemically with the anle138b compound. The results reveal that interfering with oligomerized α-synuclein in the melanoma cells in these tumor xenografts led to a substantial upregulation and expression of major histocompatibility complex proteins, which are pertinent to enhancing anti-melanoma immune responses.

Multicentre phase II trial of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 inhibitor (TM5614) plusnivolumab in Japanese advanced melanoma patients: immune resistance remains one of the major efforts in melanomaresearch.

Multicentre phase II trial of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 inhibitor (TM5614) plusnivolumab in Japanese advanced melanoma patients: immune resistance remains one of the major efforts in melanomaresearch.

Faecalibacterium prausnitzii strain EXL01 boosts efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors

ABSTRACT Gut microbiota impacts responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). A high level of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii have been associated with a positive response to ICI in multiple cancer types. Here, based on fecal shotgun metagenomics data, we show in two independent cohorts of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and advanced melanoma that a high level of F. prausnitzii at baseline is positively associated with a better clinical response to ICI. In MCA205 tumor-bearing mice, administration of F. prausnitzii strain EXL01, already in clinical development for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, restores the anti-tumor response to ICI in the context of antibiotic-induced microbiota perturbation at clinical and tumor transcriptomics level. In vitro, EXL01 strain enhances T cell activation in the presence of ICI. Interestingly, oral administration of EXL01 strain did not induce any change in fecal microbiota diversity or composition, suggesting a direct effect on immune cells in the small intestine. F. prausnitzii strain EXL01 will be evaluated as an adjuvant to ICI in multiple cancers in the near future.

Encorafenib and binimetinib followed by radiotherapy for patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma and brain metastases (E-BRAIN/GEM1802 phase II study).

Encorafenib plus binimetinib (EB) is a standard of care treatment for advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma. We assessed efficacy and safety of encorafenib plus binimetinib in patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma and brain metastasis (BM) and explored if radiotherapy improves the duration of response. E-BRAIN/GEM1802 was a prospective, multicenter, single arm, phase II trial that enrolled patients with melanoma BRAFV600-mutant and BM. Patients received encorafenib 450mg once daily plus binimetinib 45mg BID, and those who achieved partial response or stable disease at first tumor assessment were offered radiotherapy. Treatment continued until progression.Primary endpoint was intracranial response rate (icRR) after 2 months of EB, establishing a futility threshold of 60%. The study included 25 patients with no BM symptoms and 23 patients with BM symptoms regardless of using corticosteroids. Among them, 31 patients (64.6%) received sequential radiotherapy. After two months, icRR was 70.8% (95% CI: 55.9-83.1); 10.4% complete response. Median intracranial PFS and OS were 8.5 (95% CI: 6.4-11.8) and 15.9 (95% CI: 10.7-21.4) months, respectively (8.3 months for icPFS and 13.9 months OS for patients receiving RDT). Most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse event was alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increased (10.4%). Encorafenib plus binimetinib showed promising clinical benefit in terms of icRR, and tolerable safety profile with low frequency of high grade TRAEs, in patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma and BM, including those with symptoms and need for steroids. Sequential radiotherapy is feasible but it does not seem to prolong response.

Combination Atezolizumab, Cobimetinib, and Vemurafenib as a Treatment Option in BRAF V600 Mutation-Positive Melanoma: Patient Selection and Perspectives.

The treatment landscape for advanced and metastatic melanoma has drastically changed in recent years, with the advent of novel therapeutic options such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies offering remarkable efficacy and significantly improved patient outcomes compared to traditional approaches. Approximately 50% of melanomas harbor activating BRAF mutations, with over 90% resulting in BRAF V600E. Tumors treated with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy have a high rate of developing resistance within six months. Combination therapy with MEK inhibitors helped to mitigate this treatment resistance and led to improved outcomes. Due to the up-regulation of PD-1/PD-L1 receptors in tumors treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy, further studies included a third combination agent, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. This triple combination therapy may have superior efficacy and a manageable safety profile when compared with single or double agent therapy regimens.