Taiwan Power Company proposed ultimate response guidelines (URGs) to mitigate the so-called ‘Fukushima type accident’ of nuclear power plants. As stipulated in URGs, operators will depressurize the reactor coolant system if necessary to bring in low-pressure water. Containment venting is then used to dissipate the heat generated from the decay. These collective actions are called DIVing (depressurizing, injecting and venting) in URGs. The actions are designed to avoid large-scale evacuation of the public around the damaged plant during an accident. In this study, the effectiveness of DIVing in preventing radioactive emission to the environment is evaluated using RELAP5 codes. The plant analyzed is Lungmen Nuclear Power Station, which has two 1350-MWe advanced boiling water reactors (ABWR) designed by General Electric. In the Standard Operating Procedure of DIVing in URGs, controlled depressurization is executed to bring the pressure to the lowest operating pressure of Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC) system. The core water level is kept high while RCIC is in operation.. Emergency depressurization is carried out when RCIC fails. The executing time of DIVing as specified in URGs is too conservative. The study identifies the acceptable initial states for operators to carry out DIVing actions. The success criterion is to keep the peak cladding temperature below 1088 K (1500°F) during the transient, which is the temperature of cladding breach and the initiation of gap release of radionuclide from fuel rod.In this study, depressurization transients in the station blackout accident of ABWR are simulated using RELAP5/3D. The results show that the peak cladding temperature obtained during a depressurization transient depends on the time of depressurization, initial pressure, initial water level and injection rate of low-pressure water. When the water level and injection rate are fixed, a region of successful depressurization on the depressurization time vs pressure plot is delineated based on the results of RELAP5 simulations. Regions of successfully depressurization for typical combinations of injection rate and water level are identified, and acceptable region’s boundary is linear.A computation aid, Guidance for Emergency Depressurization (GfED), was developed based on the simulation results of the RELAP5/3D code to assist operators in determining whether the emergency depressurization under given conditions can be performed successfully. GfED uses low-pressure injection flow rate, water level and initial pressure upon emergency depressurization as input parameters to calculate the latest time that is acceptable for emergency depressurization. The technique of linear interpolation is adopted. By comparing the result and value input by the operators, GfED can predict whether it is safe to depressurize.GfED also guides operators to determine the initial condition of a successful depressurization. Three of the four input parameters are fixed in the guidance, and the limiting value of the fourth parameter of a successful depressurization is calculated. These values are informative for operators to manoeuvre the system while the reactor core isolation cooling system is still running.
Read full abstract