Completion Of Advance Directives Research Articles

Comparing Variations in Advance Directives Timing among Older Adults with End-Stage Renal Disease versus Cancer.

Background: Having an advance directive (AD) is associated with better care at end of life and better quality of death. However, AD completion rates among End-Stage Renal Disease patients are lower than among cancer patients. ESRD patients commonly experience cognitive impairment, reducing their ability to make their own care choices as their disease progresses. Thus, having an AD earlier in the disease trajectory is important. Little is known about differences in AD completion timing among ESRD and cancer patients. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to (1) investigate difference in AD completion and timing between ESRD and cancer patients; and, (2) identify factors associated with the early and late AD completion. Setting and Participants: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Data was drawn from the Health and Retirement Study, a United States representative longitudinal survey of older adults, using exit interviews conducted from 2006 to 2016 among 1886 proxy reporters of deceased participants with ESRD or cancer. Results: ESRD patients had lower rates of AD completion compared to those with cancer. Higher education and being older were negatively associated with late AD completion in the last 3months of life. Additionally, decedents with a diagnosis of ESRD, older age, and with higher education had higher odds of completing ADs one year or more before death. Discussions/Conclusions: While ESRD patient were less likely to have ADs, those that had ADS were more likely than cancer patients to develop ADs earlier in the disease trajectory. Further studies are needed to determine effective strategies to increase the AD completion rate among patients with ESRD.

The Association of Chinese Ethnicity and Language Preference with Advance Directive Completion Among Older Patients in an Integrated Health System (S510)

The Association of Chinese Ethnicity and Language Preference with Advance Directive Completion Among Older Patients in an Integrated Health System (S510)

Exploring the Motivations for Completing Advance Care Directives: A Qualitative Study of Majority/Minority Israeli People Without Dementia.

BackgroundCompleting advance directives has been declared an essential instrument for preserving and respecting the autonomy and preferences for end-of-life care of people living with dementia. However, research deciphering the reasoning behind the decision to complete or not advance directives in the case of dementia remains limited, especially among people pertaining to different majority/minority groups.ObjectivesTo explore the motivations of people without dementia in Israel to complete or not to complete advance directives and to compare these motivations among the majority veteran Jewish group, the minority Jewish Former Soviet Union immigrant group, and the minority Arab group.MethodsThis qualitative study used purposive sampling and focus groups with discussions elicited by a vignette. A total of 42 Israeli people without dementia participated in 6 focus groups: two with veteran Jews (n = 14), two with Jewish immigrants from the Former Soviet Union (n = 14), and two with Arabs (n = 14). The analysis followed recommended steps for thematic content analysis.ResultsFour overarching themes were identified: (1) the meaning of dementia-related advance directives, (2) motivations for willingness to complete advance directives, (3) motivations for not being willing to complete advance directives, and (4) ethical dilemmas. Some of the themes were common to all groups, while others were informed by the groups' unique characteristics. Participants displayed a lack of knowledge and misunderstanding about advance directives, and central concepts such as autonomy and competence. Furthermore, stigmatic images of dementia and of the person with the diagnosis were associated to participants' motivations to complete advance directives.ConclusionsThere is need to expand comparative research among culturally and socially similar and dissimilar groups within a country as well as between countries in order to better guide public health efforts to increase the rates of advance directives completion. Special attention should be paid to decreasing stigmatic beliefs and understanding unique cultural values and motivations.

Palliative Care, Patient-Reported Measures, and Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients With Cirrhosis

ContextStudies of palliative care (PC) in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis have been retrospective, with limited evaluation of patient-reported measures and outcomes. ObjectivesTo examine the relationship between PC, patient-reported measures (quality of life and functional status), and outcomes. MethodsWe performed a prospective cohort study of patients with cirrhosis hospitalized from 2014 to 2019. We recorded PC consultation details, quality of life (chronic liver disease questionnaire), and functional status (functional status questionnaire). Patients were followed for 90 days to assess readmissions, costs, and mortality. ResultsSeventy-four of 679 patients saw PC, often later in the hospitalization (median hospital day 8; IQR 4–16). Those who saw PC had greater Charlson comorbidity index (mean 6.8 vs. 5.9), MELD (mean 25 vs. 20), and prior 30-day admission (47% vs. 35%). Compared to those who did not see PC, PC patients had greater impairments in intermediate activities of daily living (83% vs. 72%), social activity (72% vs. 59%), quality of interactions (49% vs. 36%), abdominal symptoms (mean score 3.1 vs. 3.6), activity (mean 3.3 vs. 3.6), and overall quality of life (mean 3.6 vs. 3.8). PC was associated with fewer transfusions and upper endoscopies and with greater completion of advanced directives. After multivariable adjustment, PC was not associated with intensive care, 30-day readmissions, 90-day costs, or mortality. ConclusionPC occurs infrequently and late in those with more severe liver disease and functional impairment. PC may be associated with reduction in utilization and greater completion of advanced directives. Randomized trials are needed to evaluate PC for this population.

Advance Directive Documentation in a Huntington's Disease Clinic: A Retrospective Chart Review.

Background:Advance care planning (ACP) benefits patients and caregivers, yet it is underutilized and little is known about ACP in Huntington’s disease (HD) clinics. This study sought to determine the percentage of charts with AD documentation within an HD clinic.Methods:A retrospective chart review was conducted on a randomly selected sample of charts within an HD clinic. HD patients ≥18 y/o with a positive genetic test (≥40 CAG repeats) seen between January 2018 and June 2021 were included. Charts were reviewed for documentation of ADs either in provider notes or in the electronic medical records (EMR).Results:Ninety-one charts were reviewed (n = 91). Twenty-two charts (24.2%) mentioned a completed AD within a provider’s note; however, only nine (9.9%) had an AD available in the EMR. Cognitive status, primary insurance type, presence of dysphagia, and stage of disease were associated with documentation of completed ADs within a provider’s note.Discussion:The rate of completed ADs mentioned in a provider’s note (24.2%) was significantly lower than rates of AD completion in a previous study within the HD population (38%). Additional studies focused on improving rates AD completion are needed.HighlightsMost patients with Huntington’s disease do not have documentation of completed advance directives (ADs) within their medical chart. In a retrospective chart review 24.2% of patients seen in a specialty HD clinic had documentation of ADs in a provider’s note and 9.9% had ADs available within the EMR.

What methods increase the completion of advanced directives before hospitalization?

What methods increase the completion of advanced directives before hospitalization?

Attitudes and Intentions of Adult Patients With Cancer Toward Advance Directive: Direct and Indirect Relationships.

Advance directives (ADs) are used to respect the will of patients experiencing a terminal illness regarding preferred medical treatment and to protect their rights. However, the AD completion rate is low. The aim of this study was to explore the factors influencing patient intentions toward AD. The Theory of Planned Behavior was used as the framework for this study. This study used a cross-sectional design using a face-to-face interview with structured questionnaires. A total of 230 patients with cancer were recruited. Path analysis was used to examine the hypotheses. Demographic variables were not correlated with patients' attitudes toward AD. Patients' knowledge of AD ( β = .68, t = 16.15, P < .00) and recognition of important others' attitudes toward AD ( β = .30, t = 10.74, P < .00) were predictors of patients' attitudes toward AD. Patients' attitudes toward AD ( β = .27, t = 3.74, P < .00) and behavior control over AD ( β = .09, t = 1.99, P < .04) predicted patients' intentions toward AD. Patients' knowledge of AD, the patients' important others' attitudes, and behavior control toward AD are predictively associated with the intention toward AD completion. Only when patients with cancer are provided an accessible approach for obtaining knowledge regarding AD and are given sufficient time and space can they and their significant others understand the meaning of AD and decide to complete one on their own terms.

Are Young Adults Ready to Complete Advance Directives?

The dual objective of this study is to examine the perspectives of young adults toward advance directives (ADs) and their preferences related to life-sustaining treatment and care options. Participants include graduate students (n = 30) attending a university in New York State. Data were collected using a structured survey questionnaire and Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form. Bivariate summary statistics were performed to address the study aims. The mean age of study participants was 24 years, 60% were female, 60% white, and 27% Black. Most (87%) participants reported being comfortable discussing death and end-of-life care and preferring to make their own decisions. Under the circumstance of no pulse and/or not breathing, 87% want CPR. With a pulse and respiration, 96% want artificially administered fluids and nutrition, 90% want a trial period of intubation and/or mechanical ventilation, 67% want to be sent to a hospital, 67% want antibiotics, and 53% want no limitations on medical intervention. Our findings extend upon previous research by quantifying young adults' specific beliefs, experiences, and preferences regarding advance directives and life-sustaining interventions. Young adults in our study preferred maximum medical interventions for life-sustaining treatment and care. Given the troubling trends in unintended injury (eg, car crashes and drug overdose) as the leading cause of death among young adults, they should be given an opportunity to understand the options and treatments available and should be encouraged to complete an AD.

A Community Engagement Model to Drive Advance Directive Discussion and Completion

Background Advance directives (ADs) describe individuals’ preferences for life-sustaining treatments and/or surrogate decision-makers, to help avoid unwanted, burdensome treatments at the end-of-life. However, only 36.7% of adults have completed an AD. There is growing interest in adopting a public health approach to end-of-life care, including ADs. We describe the experience of Honoring Choices Tennessee (HCT) which developed a pilot program, Advance Directives at Work in Tennessee (AD@WorkTN), to enhance AD completion by the general public workforce. Methods The AD@WorkTN initiative targeted adults in the Tennessee workforce by engaging human resource (HR) leaders in educational presentations. Each workshop provided resources to employers to integrate ADs into the employee orientation and benefits enrollment process. Educational materials, web tools, podcasts, AD forms, and a demonstration of how to complete an AD were included. Participants were directed to the HCT website which contains the state advance directive documents and with detailed instructions, as well as the co-branded MyDirectives app (MYD), to securely upload completed ADs. In April 2021 a HCT sponsored PBS documentary on advance care planning was produced with statewide distribution. Results Over a 2-year period, 58 workshops were conducted for 260 human resources leaders representing 958 businesses. As a result, 23 businesses have included ADs as part of the employee benefit process. Additionally, a 2-year multifaceted public outreach campaign between 2019-21 has reached 2,950 employees and 958 businesses. Approximately 81,500 Tennessee viewers have seen the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) documentary on advance care planning. There have been 2,954 visits to the HCT website and 411 visits to the co-branded MyDirectives site. Conclusion AD@WorkTN is a promising model to promote integration of ADs into the employee orientation and benefits enrollment processes. Enhanced discussion and completion of ADs among employed individuals and enhanced public discourse such as podcasts and television productions may encourage intergenerational conversations about end-of-life care and documentation in healthcare records.

Advance Directive Completion and Hospital Out-of-Pocket Expenditures

One silver lining of COVID-19 has been the ushering in of ‘the golden age of telehealth’. However, this unplanned rapid conversion to telehealth left many providers and clinics unprepared to address systemic barriers that adversely affect older adults, particularly those with disabilities. Data from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse suggest that the rapid adoption of telehealth in mental health clinics during COVID-19 widened telehealth utilization disparities for older Veterans (65+) with disabilities. With 4.5 million Veterans 55+ who have at least one disability more attention to addressing this widening gap is needed. For those with hearing, vision, and complex mobility impairments, there are unique challenges to initiating telehealth services. Dr. Touchett will present preliminary findings while discussing ethical and contextual considerations when using telehealth with older Veterans who have disabilities, while discussing ways to facilitate robust clinical encounters for this population.

Advance Directive Completion and Hospital Out-of-Pocket Expenditures

Healthcare costs remain high at end of life. Although advance directives (AD) have been shown to improve care congruence with patients’ preferences and lower cost of healthcare services, little is known about the relationship between AD completion and hospital out-of-pocket costs. This study examined whether AD completion was associated with lower hospital out-of-pocket spending at end of life. We used the Health and Retirement Study participants who died between 2000 and 2014 (N=9,228) to examine the association through the use of a two-part analytic model that has been widely used in health economics. We controlled for socioeconomic status, death-related characteristics, and health insurance coverage and imputed missing data using multiple imputation by chained equations. Of the 43.9% of decedents who completed an AD, 90.7% chose to limit care or to be kept comfortable; 78.8% indicated that they wanted to withhold treatment, and 5.6% wanted to prolong life. Having an AD was significantly associated with $632 (95% CI: [-$1,116.47, -$146.71]) lower hospital out-of-pocket costs, with greater savings among younger decedents, dropping from $1,560 (95% CI: [-$2,652, -$268]) at age 50 to $230 (95% CI: [-$445, -$14]) at age 110. Decedents who completed an AD 12 months or less before death had higher out-of-pocket spending ($1,591 on average) than those who completed more than a year before death ($1,001 on average). Our findings have policy implications for physician-patient communication about costs of care and may provide an opportunity for physicians to involve cost-sharing discussions when completing ADs with patients.

COVID-19 and Death Anxiety: The Impact on Students’ Appraisals to Completing Advance Directives

This study examined possible effects of COVID-19 on students’ appraisals, coping, and responses to completing advance directives (ADs). We used the transactional model of stress and coping to explore 93 undergraduate students’ responses to an AD assignment completed in an undergraduate course during COVID-19. Students watched a recorded lecture, read content related to ADs, and examined a sample copy of a 5 Wishes document. Students completed an assignment reflecting on reactions to completing ADs. Content analysis of 65 responses indicated almost 10% of students mentioned COVID-19 or the pandemic as a reason to complete ADs. Approximately 18% mentioned their youth and 40% mentioned sudden or serious illness as reasons to complete ADs. Nearly 30% mentioned death anxiety as a reason for being unprepared to complete ADs. Instructors should consider ways to inform and help students process their emotions given contextual factors (e.g. the pandemic) when teaching about ADs.

Making the Informal Formal: Discussing and Completing Advance Care Plans in Care Dyads with Cognitive Impairment.

Background: Discussing advance care planning (ACP) with care partners may be a steppingstone to the completion of advance directives (ADs) for persons with cognitive impairment (PwCIs). Objectives: To examine whether PwCI-reported occurrence of and PwCI-care partner agreement about ACP discussions are associated with completion of ADs. Design and Subjects: We conducted a secondary, cross-sectional analysis of data from 1672 PwCI-care partner dyads in the BLINDED study. PwCIs were Medicare beneficiaries in the US, aged >65 years, and diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Care partners were identified by PwCIs as being most involved in their health care. Measurements: PwCIs' completion of ADs was determined by 1 or more affirmative responses to dichotomous indicators for formalizing a living will, medical directive, or durable power of attorney for health care. Discussion occurrence was based on PwCI reports and agreement between PwCI and care partner reports of prior conversations about PwCIs' ACP preferences between PwCIs and care partners. Results: In logistic regression models adjusted for PwCI and care partner characteristics, PwCIs who had (vs. had not) discussed ACP were 10% more likely to complete ADs. PwCIs from dyads agreeing (vs. disagreeing) a discussion occurred were 7% more likely to complete ADs. PwCIs from care dyads in agreement (vs. disagreement) about non-discussion were 11% less likely to formalize ADs. Conclusions: Discussing ACP with care partners plays a direct, positive role in completing ADs among PwCIs. Health care providers who approach ACP as a dyadic, communicative decision-making process from the outset may facilitate PwCIs' uptake of ADs.

Impact of advance care planning consults on advance directives completion.

Advance care planning (ACP) consults have been credited with increasing the likelihood that patients will receive desired care at the end of life, including reduced hospitalization and spending.We aimed to investigate whether implementation of ACP consults leads to improved advance directive (AD) completion rates. Retrospective case-control evaluation. Chart review was conducted among patients in hematology/oncology and primary care to compare AD completion rates of patients in each clinical area offered ACP consults between July 1, 2017, and June 30, 2018, and those not offered ACP consults prior to July 1, 2017. Completed ADs increased from historic rates of 1% to 65.9% of primary care patient records. Among hematology/oncology patients offered consults, completed ADs were present in 28.1% of patient records compared with historic rates of 3%. Patients offered ACP consults had significantly higher AD completion rates than those without consults in both primary care and hematology/oncology practices. The difference in ACP consult attendance between the primary care and hematology/oncology groups clearly suggests that further improvements can be made to assist patients in accessing AD education and completion support.

S1081 Outcomes of a Quality Improvement Initiative to Improve Advance Care Planning Among Outpatients With Decompensated Cirrhosis

Introduction: Advance care planning (ACP) aims to provide care at the end of life (EOL) that is consistent with a patient’s wishes, but it is infrequently performed in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. We implemented a quality improvement (QI) initiative in a hepatology fellows clinic at a major tertiary medical center with the goal of increasing advance directive (AD) completion among patients with decompensated cirrhosis. The goal of this analysis is to describe factors related to successful AD completion and preliminary effects of AD completion on EOL outcomes. Methods: The QI intervention, consisting of provider education, electronic health record templates, and standardized workflows, was conducted between November 2018 and March 2021. We performed a retrospective chart review of adult patients with decompensated cirrhosis seen during this period. We collected data on whether an AD was successfully completed and type of AD (first completed, if multiple). We also assessed location of death and receipt of hospice care among decedent patients. Descriptive statistics and univariate logistic regression were performed using STATA 14.2. Results: A total of 120 patients with decompensated cirrhosis were seen during the QI intervention. Our cohort was mostly male (62%), Latino (55%), Medicaid-insured (70%) and non-transplant candidates (86%). AD completion improved from 8% (N=10) to 44% (N=53) by the end of the study period. Most ADs were completed in the outpatient setting (N=38, 72%) and were healthcare proxy designation forms (N=41, 77%). A diagnosis of NASH (OR: 4.25, 95% CI: 1.11-16.2) and divorced marital status (OR: 10.23, CI: 2.04-51.3) were the only factors associated with successful AD completion. Seventeen (14%) patients died during the study period, of which 12 (71%) had an AD. Decedents with an AD were more likely overall to receive hospice (67% vs. 20%) and die under hospice care (42% vs. 20%). Conclusion: Following our QI intervention, 44% of patients with decompensated cirrhosis had an AD, which were largely health care proxy forms completed in the outpatient setting. No significant disparities in AD completion by age, gender, or race were observed from our intervention. AD completion was associated with higher rates of receiving hospice among decedents. These findings suggest benefits of AD completion on EOL care in this population.Table 1.: AD=advance directive, SD=standard deviation, LT=liver transplant, MOLST=medical order for life-sustaining treatment, DNR=do-not-resuscitate order.

COVID-19 and advance care planning: A unique opportunity.

32 Background: Advance Care Planning (ACP) is a process to document patient preferences for future health care. Conversations between healthcare providers, patients, and loved-ones are required to reflect a patient’s values, goals, and ultimately their choices for life-sustaining treatments (LST). The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the critical importance of these discussions and the need for improved patient engagement. Methods: As COVID-19 infections surged, the VA Northern California Health Care System (VA NCHCS) Hospice and Palliative Care Section (HPCS) partnered with Patient Aligned Care Teams to expand urgent outreach to high-risk patients needing LST documentation. High risk was defined as age &gt; 80, COPD or asthma diagnosis, or Care Assessment Need Score &gt; 80 (CAN Score models risk of hospitalization or death within 1 year). An experienced HPCS Nurse Practitioner (NP) contacted these identified patients to 1.) provide COVID-19 education, 2.) conduct a high-quality goals of care conversation, and 3.) complete LST documentation and other ACP needs. A representative cohort was then followed up to evaluate concordance of treatment with their documented preferences. Results: Between March 2020 and September 2020, 910 patients were identified as high risk. Of these patients, 294 agreed to participate in the telehealth visit and complete LST documentation. Importantly, 108 (37%) patients chose DNR and other LST limitations. In addition, 142 (48%) patients created POLST documentation and 128 (43%) completed Advance Directives. Over 70% of patients who were hospitalized in the VA received care concordant with the newly documented LST preferences. A follow up survey of 29 participants found the outreach impactful and their preferences documented correctly. Conclusions: Prior studies have demonstrated success at educating primary providers to conduct ACP discussions, but given the limitations imposed by COVID-19 restrictions, this novel and highly cost-effective process of coupling a highly trained HPCS NP with a primary care team to perform ACP was piloted with success. After only a single ACP discussion, patients were able to formalize their limits to treatment and subsequent care aligned with these preferences. Patients also found this focused ACP discussion meaningful. This pathway will be integrated within the VA NCHCS as a long-term approach to continued ACP outreach.

A letter to your care providers: implementation and analysis of a letter-based advance care planning initiative for gynecologic oncology patients

<h3>Objectives:</h3> To determine the impact of a prospective, student-led, letter-based advance care planning (ACP) intervention on rates of ACP conversations and documentation among gynecologic oncology (GO) inpatients. <h3>Methods:</h3> Retrospective analysis of patients admitted to the GO service at a single academic institution in 2019 showed that compliance with recommendations for ACP documentation was suboptimal. We initiated a quality improvement initiative from January through September 2020 to improve our compliance. Patients admitted to the GO service were given ACP packets with a letter-based advance directive (AD) worksheet modeled after the Stanford Letter Project. In January and February 2020, patients who were interested in learning more about ACP were visited by medical students trained to lead ACP conversations. From March through September 2020, students were unavailable to facilitate in-person ACP conversations due to COVID-19 restrictions. Pre and post-intervention ACP documentation of patients admitted to the GO service were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and associations between sociodemographic characteristics and ACP documentation were analyzed using logistic regression. <h3>Results:</h3> Since implementation of the letter-based ACP intervention, 98 patients were admitted to the GO service. The majority of those admitted had cancer (n=60, 61%). Only 16 patients (16%) had an AD on admission, and 65 patients (66%) reported never having an ACP conversation. Of 82 patients without ADs, 71 (87%) received an ACP packet. Of those receiving packets, 8 (11%) requested more information about ACP and 6 (8%) participated in an ACP conversation with a student. At 9-month follow-up among patients receiving a packet, 9 patients added an AD to their EMR (13%), and 2 updated their AD (3%). After the intervention, AD completion in our population went from 16% to 26%. Among those receiving ACP packets, increasing age was associated with increased post-admission AD completion (OR 1.1, p=0.01). <h3>Conclusions:</h3> Completion of AD among patients continues to be low. Barriers to AD completion include patient and provider reluctance surrounding discussing these issues and difficulty with uploading these documents into the EMR. Letter-based ADs offer a unique method for introducing ACP earlier in cancer care and may lead to increased conversations about patient values and goals of care. More work is needed to improve occurrence and documentation of ACP conversations.

Factors associated with willingness to complete advance directives in older adults

This study aimed to examine the factors associated with willingness to complete advance directives (ADs) in community-dwelling older adults. In total, 121 community-dwelling older adults in Korea completed the questionnaires inquiring about their willingness and perceptions in completing ADs (susceptibility, severity, benefits, barriers, and cues to action), which were based on the Health Belief Model. The mean score for willingness to complete ADs was 6.2 (SD = 3.6). A multiple linear regression analysis showed that higher scores of perceived severity (β = 0.199, p = 0.021), perceived benefits (β = 0.221, p = 0.016), and cues to action (β = 0.159, p = 0.030) were associated with a greater willingness to complete ADs. However, higher scores of perceived barriers (β = -0.409, p < 0.001) were likely to lower the willingness to complete ADs. This study highlights that future interventions aimed at increasing AD completion rates in older adults should consider improving perceived severity, benefits, and cues to action and minimizing perceived barriers.

Verifying intervention fidelity procedures for a palliative home care intervention with pilot study results.

Fidelity (consistency of intervention implementation) is essential to rigorous research. Intervention fidelity maintains study internal validity, intervention reproducibility, and transparency in the research conduct. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe intervention fidelity strategies/procedures developed for a pilot study testing a new palliative care nursing intervention (FamPALcare) for families managing advanced lung disease. The procedures described herein are based on the fidelity best practices recommendations from the NIH Consortium. An evidence-based checklist guided observational ratings of the fidelity procedures used and the intervention content implemented in each intervention session. Descriptive data on how participants understood (received), enacted, or used the intervention information were summarized. The fidelity checklist observational scores found ≥93% of the planned intervention content was implemented, and the fidelity strategies were adhered to consistently during each intervention session. The small variation (7%) in implementation was expected and related to participants' varying experiences, input, and/or questions. The helpfulness scale items include participants' ability to use home care resources, to anticipate and manage end-of-life symptoms, and to use Advance Directive forms. The high ratings (M = 4.4) on the 1-5 (very helpful) Likert Helpfulness Scale verified participants utilized the information from the intervention. Furthermore, there was an improvement in patients' breathlessness scores and completion of Advance Directive forms at 3 months after baseline. It is essential to plan intervention fidelity strategies to use throughout a study and to report fidelity results.

Increasing the completion rate of the advance directives in primary care setting \u2013 a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThe completion rate of Advance Directives (ADs) has been low. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of two interventions 1) active counseling sessions coupled with passive patient education pamphlets, and 2) patient education pamphlets alone, compared with 3) control group (usual care), in increasing the completion rates of ADs in the primary care setting.MethodsMulticenter randomised controlled trial in four public primary care clinics in Singapore under Singapore Health Services. Randomization was performed via block randomization with Sequential Numbered Opaque Sealed Envelopes. Participants were randomized into 1) active intervention group (both counseling by primary care physicians and patient education pamphlets) or 2) passive intervention group (only patient education pamphlets), and 3) control group (usual care) with follow-up at 6 weeks. The main outcome measure is the proportion of participants who completed / planned to complete) ADs six weeks post-intervention.ResultsFour hundred five participants were eligible to participate in the study. One hundred eighty-eight participants were recruited into the study (response rate = 46.4%), of which 158 completed the study. There was no significant difference between the control group, passive intervention group, and active intervention group, in terms of completion rates of ADs (29.4, 36.4, and 30.8% respectively).ConclusionsThis randomized controlled trial did not support the use of patient education pamphlets with or without active counseling sessions in increasing the completion of ADs in a primary care setting in Singapore. The optimal intervention strategy depends on each health system’s context and resources, taking into consideration patients’ profiles, which deserves further studies.Trial registrationRegistered on April 17, 2018 clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03499847).