Advance Care Planning Research Articles

Care conundrum in the emergency department: The gap between clinician awareness and patient expectations surrounding advance directives.

Clinicians in the emergency department (ED) frequently encounter seriously ill patients at a time when advance directives may be pivotal in improved clinician decision-making. The objectives of this study were to identify the prevalence of advanced directives in ED patients, as well as patterns of advance care discussions between patients and providers. This study describes patients' perceptions and expectations of such serious illness discussions in an emergency care setting with the expectation of including patients as strategic members of the care team. Trained research assistants in two emergency departments surveyed patients over age 65, or their caregivers, from July 2016 to August 2018. Patients were verbally administered a standard survey tool related to advance directives and advance care planning. 497 out of 877 patients completed surveys (59.4%). 50% of patients reported having an advance care planning document. The large majority (92%) of patients with an advance directive had not been asked about it during their ED visit. When questioned about their personal preferences, 79% of patients thought emergency physicians should be aware of their wishes regarding life-sustaining treatments and end-of-life care. Paradoxically, only 38% expressed a desire to discuss advance care plans with an ED clinician. Older patients expect emergency clinicians to be aware of their care preferences, yet most are not asked about these care preferences in the ED. The large gap between patient preference and reality suggests the need for more targeted discussion by ED clinicians and translation of patient perspectives into system healthcare improvements. Future studies should explore barriers to advance care planning in the ED as well as patient preferences for these conversations to support a true healthcare learning system.

Acceptance level of advance care planning and its associated factors among the public: A nationwide survey

BackgroundAdvance care planning (ACP) can contribute to individuals making decisions about their healthcare preferences in advance of serious illness. Up to now, the acceptance level and associated factors of ACP among the public in China remain unclear. This study aims to investigate the acceptance level of ACP in China and identify factors associated with it based on the socioecological model.MethodsA total of 19,738 participants were included in this survey. We employed a random forest regression analysis to select factors derived from the socioecological model. Multivariate generalized linear model analysis was then conducted to explore the factors that were associated with the acceptance level of ACP.ResultsOn a scale ranging from 0 to 100, the median score for acceptance level of ACP was 64.00 (IQR: 48.00–83.00) points. The results of the multivariate generalized linear model analysis revealed that participants who scored higher on measures of openness and neuroticism personality traits, as well as those who had greater perceptions of social support, higher levels of health literacy, better neighborly relationships, family health, and family social status, were more likely to accept ACP. Conversely, participants who reported higher levels of subjective well-being and greater family communication levels demonstrated a lower likelihood of accepting ACP.ConclusionsThis study identified multiple factors associated with the acceptance level of ACP. The findings offer valuable insights that can inform the design and implementation of targeted interventions aimed at facilitating a good death and may have significant implications for the formulation of end-of-life care policies and practices in other countries facing similar challenges.

Structure of Advance Care Planning Practice by Home Health Nurses for Multigenerational Families With Dependent Children and Terminally Ill Grandparents

The present study aimed to identify the structure of advance care planning (ACP) practices implemented by home health nurses (HHNs) for multigenerational families with dependent children and terminally ill grandparents. Interviews of 20 HHNs were conducted. The grounded theory approach was used to describe the interactions among families with dependent children, terminally ill grandparents, and HHNs. The results showed that the structure of ACP practices for multigenerational families with dependent children and terminally ill grandparents was composed of 2 levels. First, HHNs were providing the underlying foundational “Practice of supporting end-of-life care (EOL care) at home” for family members from 2 generations: sandwich generation caregivers (SGCs) and terminally ill grandparents. Second, they were providing “Practices that connect multiple generations,” “Practices that address the children,” and “Practices that involve hands-on experience and communication” for multigenerational families with dependent children and terminally ill grandparents. Practices based on providing stability among family members from 2 generations, SGCs and terminally ill grandparents, were the nursing practice structure that activated ACP for multigenerational families with dependent children and terminally ill grandparents.

Psychological stress of general practitioners in the care of patients with palliative care needs: an exploratory study

BackgroundIn Germany, general practitioners play a pivotal role in palliative care provision. Caring for patients with palliative care needs can be a burden for general practitioners, highlighting the importance of self-care and mental health support. This study aimed to explore the role of palliative care in general practitioners’ daily work, the stressors they experience, their coping mechanisms, and the potential benefits of Advance Care Planning in this context.MethodsAn exploratory approach was employed, combining a short quantitative survey with qualitative interviews. The analysis was based on a structuring qualitative content analysis, following a deductive-inductive procedure and integrating the Stress-Strain Model and Lazarus’ Transactional Model of Stress and Coping. We recruited eleven general practitioners to take part in the study.ResultsGeneral practitioners viewed palliative care as integral to their practice but faced challenges such as time constraints and perceived expertise gaps. Societal taboos often hindered conversations on the topic of death. Most general practitioners waited for their patients to initiate the topic. Some general practitioners viewed aspects of palliative care as potentially distressing. They used problem-focused (avoiding negative stressors, structuring their daily schedules) and emotion-focused (discussions with colleagues) coping strategies. Still, general practitioners indicated a desire for specific psychological support options. Advance Care Planning, though relatively unfamiliar, was acknowledged as valuable for end-of-life conversations.ConclusionsPalliative care can be associated with negative psychological stress for general practitioners, often coming from external factors. Despite individual coping strategies in place, it is advisable to explore concepts for professional psychological relief.Trial registrationNot registered.

Factors Associated with Patient–Caregiver Concordance about Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences among Advanced Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

ObjectivesConcordance of preferences for end-of-life care regarding patients between patients with advanced cancer and family caregivers can improve the likelihood of honoring dying patients’ wishes. However, there is a dearth of knowledge in mainland China. The purpose of this study was to examine patient–family caregiver concordance about patients’ life-sustaining treatment preferences and associated factors among patients with advanced cancer in China. MethodsFrom September 2019 to December 2021, a convenience sample of 406 dyads of advanced cancer patient–family caregiver were recruited from 2 tertiary hospitals in Wuhan, China. Participants completed a questionnaire about patient's preferences for life-sustaining treatment, respectively. The concordance was assessed by percent agreement and kappa coefficients. Associated factors were identified by univariate analysis and binary logistic regression. ResultsThe average concordance rate on the preferences for life-sustaining treatment was 56.1%, ranging from 52.9% to 59.3%. Factors associated with a higher level of patient–family caregiver concordance were following: patients who were married, whose educational levels were at college or above, who had not been informed of diagnosis by a physician, who had been informed of the effects and side effects of related drugs by a physician, and who cared for a seriously ill family member or friend and caregivers whose educational level were primary or below. ConclusionsThe patient–family caregiver concordance about patients’ life-sustaining treatment preferences among patients with advanced cancer was poor. Patients’ and caregivers’ understanding of life-sustaining treatment and its efficacy in end-of-life should be facilitated. Relevant conversation should be encouraged between patients and caregivers, thus providing value-concordant end-of-life care for patients with cancer. Implications for Nursing PracticeHealth professionals need to carry out advanced care planning in oncology departments on mainland China to encourage patients and caregivers to discuss patients’ end-of-life care preferences. Facilitating patients’ and caregivers’ understanding of life-sustaining treatment preferences may help improve the patient–caregiver concordance on life-sustaining treatment preferences among patients with advanced cancer.

Experiences with a national team-based learning program for advance care planning in pediatric palliative care

BackgroundAdvance Care Planning (ACP) enables patients and relatives to define and share values, goals and preferences for future medical treatment and care. The IMplementing Pediatric Advance Care Planning Toolkit (IMPACT), developed in the Netherlands, is a method for conducting ACP in pediatric palliative care. Healthcare professionals who were trained to use IMPACT, indicated their need for ongoing support to practice ACP communication skills optimally over time. Therefore, we developed a team-based learning program aimed at teaching participants how to transfer knowledge on ACP, continue practicing ACP communication skills and reflect on ACP conversations within their own team context. The aim of this study was to evaluate the program’s transfer of knowledge as well as the professionals’ experience and team reflection on ACP.MethodsA one-day IMPACT train-the-trainer course was developed and a selection of healthcare professionals (facilitators) from pediatric palliative care teams (PPCTs) from all seven Dutch university hospitals and the specialized Center for Pediatric Oncology were invited to participate. Hereafter, facilitators were asked to transfer their course-acquired knowledge to their team members (learners) by organizing two coaching-on-the-job sessions. A mixed-methods design, combining questionnaires and field notes, was used to evaluate the level of knowledge transfer and team reflection achieved.ResultsEighteen healthcare professionals in the role of facilitator participated in the train-the-trainer course. In seven PPCTs one (n = 3) or two (n = 4) coaching-on-the-job session(s) took place, attended by 29 and 17 learners, respectively. In the questionnaires, 11 facilitators indicated that they had to some extent transferred acquired knowledge to their team members as intended. Sixteen out of 21 learners who participated in at least one coaching-on-the-job session, reported (somewhat) increased self-confidence for conducting ACP conversations. The reported main strength of the program was practicing with/learning from colleagues whereas dealing with workload and variation in existing ACP skills within PPCTs need more attention.ConclusionsThe newly developed team-based learning program resulted in intended transfer of knowledge and methodical reflection on ACP in coaching-on-the-job sessions in most participating PPCTs. Planning coaching-on-the-job sessions regarding ACP in pediatric palliative care with multiple healthcare professionals is challenging and needs more emphasis in the training.

Life Expectancy and Causes of Death in Patients with Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2

Background: Myotonic Dystrophy type 2 (DM2) is a dominantly inherited multisystem disease caused by a CCTG repeat expansion in intron 1 of the CNBP gene. Although in the last two decades over 1500 patients with DM2 have been diagnosed worldwide, our clinical impression of a reduced life expectancy in DM2 has not been investigated previously. Objective: The aim of this observational study was to determine the life expectancy and the causes of death in patients with genetically confirmed DM2. Methods: We identified the data of all deceased patients with DM2 in the Dutch neuromuscular database between 2000 and 2023. Ages and causes of death and the patients’ clinical features during lifetime were determined. Age of death in DM2 was compared to the general population by using life tables with prognostic cohort life expectancy (CLE) and period life expectancy (PLE) data of the Dutch electronic database of statistics (CBS StatLine). Results: Twenty-six deceased patients were identified in the Dutch DM2 cohort (n = 125). Median age of death in DM2 (70.9 years) was significantly lower compared to sex- and age-matched CLE (78.1 years) and PLE (82.1 years) in the Netherlands. Main causes of death were cardiac diseases (31%) and pneumonia (27%). Seven patients (27%) had a malignancy at the time of death. Conclusion: These results provide new insights into the phenotype of DM2. Life expectancy in patients with DM2 is reduced, possibly attributable to multiple causes including increased risk of cardiac disease, pneumonia, and malignancies. The occurrence of a significantly reduced life expectancy has implications for clinical practice and may form a basis for advanced care planning, including end-of-life care, to optimize quality of life for patients with DM2 and their family. Research in larger cohorts should be done to confirm these findings and to ascertain more about the natural course in DM2.

Speaking and deciding with a serious illness

It is a GP's task to identify patients as palliative patients at an early stage using suitable instruments. As part of a multidimensional basic assessment, the needs and expectations of the patient and their loved ones are recorded. During the interview, open questions are cla-rified, concerns are addressed and treatment options are discussed; a treatment goal is then jointly developed. Based on this treatment goal, an advance care plan is drawn up in consultation with the advising specialist and, if possible, with the involvement of a trusted person. The treatment goal, decisions and measures to be taken in an emergency are recorded in appropriate documents, which also serve to coordinate and communicate between persons involved in treatment.

Navigating Improper Care Settings: Nurses' Experiences Assisting Oncological Patients at the End of Life in Surgical Departments.

Despite the growing preference for end-of-life care at home, numerous oncological patients continue to spend their final moments in surgical wards. This incongruity in settings may contribute to "dysthanasia," unnecessarily prolonging futile treatments and resulting in undue suffering. As frontline caregivers, nurses frequently bear the brunt of these challenging situations for patients and their families. To investigate the experiences of nurses providing care to terminally ill oncological patients inappropriately admitted to surgical departments. We adopted a phenomenological descriptive study. Nurses purposefully selected from 7 distinct surgical units at a University Hospital in Northeast Italy were recruited. Data collection took place through open-ended semistructured interviews. The interview content was analyzed using Colaizzi's framework. The study with 26 participants revealed emotional challenges, especially for less-experienced nurses. Diverse perspectives among nurses emphasized the need for better palliative care knowledge. Despite the commitment to quality care, collaboration challenges and discordant goals with physicians impacted comprehensive care delivery. Dysthanasia relates to participants' challenges in caring for oncological patients in inappropriate settings, hindering transparent communication and exacerbating discordance with doctors. Communication and collaboration among healthcare professionals, particularly nurses, and surgeons are crucial. Ongoing education in end-of-life care, coupled with advance care planning, empowers patients, aligns treatment choices, and prevents dysthanasia across diverse healthcare settings.

Reducing Racial Disparities at End-of-life: Using Narratives to Build Trust and Promote advance Care Planning.

Black Americans are less likely than White Americans to have advance directives, die while receiving hospice services, or have their end-of life wishes honored. The root causes of disparities include imbalance of resources, lack of trust in health care institutions, lack of adequate education regarding end-of-life options, communication differences of health care providers with black vs white patients, variable access to hospice services in different communities, and poorer pain management for Black patients compared to White patients. Because root causes are numerous, comprehensive solutions are required. When advance care planning is in place, people are more likely to choose care focused on priorities and comfort than on seeking aggressive, sometimes futile, interventions in the last weeks of life. One important component of the solution should include listening to narrative stories of Black people as they encounter life-limiting diagnoses. Gathering the stories about life events and how strength was found through adversities can be a tool for growing trusting relationships and engaging in shared decision-making. Health care professionals should invite Black patients with serious illnesses to explore the sources of their strengths and identify their core values to work toward developing directives for the nature and place of their end-of-life and help to mitigate disparities in high quality end-of-life care.

Disparities in Advanced Care Planning: Exploring Factors, Outcomes, and Equity

Disparities in Advanced Care Planning: Exploring Factors, Outcomes, and Equity

The Progression of End-of-Life Wishes and Concordance with End-of-Life Care: An Update.

Importance: Concordance between physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST) preferences and treatment at end-of-life is an important outcome measure of providing patient-centered care. Objectives: We determine whether the COVID pandemic affected clinician ability to provide goal concordant care and replicate our previous report on care concordance and change in patient preferences over time with a larger sample size. We also investigate the quality of POLST completion to determine the number of documents completed with an advance care planning (ACP) conversation or a decision maker present. Methods: Chart abstraction via structured questionnaire of 796 randomly selected patients who died in 2020 with a POLST on file. Results: We found 99% concordance in the last setting of death between a patient's POLST preferences and the care they received. We confirm our previous finding that patients' wishes shift towards a preference for lower treatment intensity at end-of-life. We found that 82% of POLSTs were created in the context of an ACP conversation, 77% with a decision maker present. Conclusion: High levels of goal concordant care were maintained during the pandemic. Because patient wishes evolve over time, clinicians should be trained and supported to revisit care preferences across the illness trajectory.

Exploring the Challenges in Palliative Care As Perceived by the Saudi Physicians: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Palliative care is essential for managing patients with life-limiting illnesses. In Saudi Arabia, providing effective palliative care is uniquely challenging due to cultural, religious, and social factors. Despite healthcare advancements, there is a gap in understanding the challenges faced by physicians in palliative care within this context. This study aimed to explore the challenges encountered in palliative care as perceived by physicians in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using an electronic questionnaire distributed among physicians involved in palliative care at the specified healthcare institutions. The questionnaire assessed their perceptions of the challenges in palliative care and the influence of their socio-demographic backgrounds on these perceptions. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). The age distribution of the enrolled physicians showed that a majority were between 20-40 years old (48.48%, n = 96). Male physicians accounted for 64.65% (n = 128), and females for 35.35% (n = 70). Various specialties were represented, with critical care (15.66%, n = 31) and radiation oncology (16.67%, n = 33) being the most common. Major challenges identified included limited outpatient and inpatient services (54.55%, n = 108), restricted access to allied healthcare professionals (60.61%, n = 120), ethical dilemmas due to triaging (63.13%, n = 125), lack of telemedicine facilities (57.07%, n = 113), and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on pain and palliative care research (60.1%, n = 119). Strategies adopted to mitigate these challenges included creating triage systems (54.55%, n = 108), using telemedicine (60.61%, n = 120), advanced care planning (63.13%, n = 125), and providing necessary personal protective equipment (PPE) (60.1%, n = 119). This study highlights significant barriers in palliative care, such as limited services, ethical dilemmas, and lack of telemedicine facilities. Addressing these challenges requires ethical support for healthcare providers, integration of telemedicine, continuous education, and improved access to multidisciplinary care teams, which are crucial for enhancing palliative care quality and ensuring comprehensive patient support.

Characteristics of palliative care in the elderly

Palliative care for elderly, mostly multimorbid people is an integrative concept that is included at an early stage of illness in addition to curative and rehabilitative treatments. Goals of treatment and in the rest of life are regularly discussed during the course in order to set individual priorities and to plan or question clarifications, treatments and nursing measures. The prognosis, the patient's wishes and values, the possible benefits and burdens of an intervention play a central role in the decision-making process. Advance care planning makes it easier to make decisions at a later stage, especially in the case of dementia, which increasingly impairs the ability to make judgments. Older people suffer not only from destressing symptoms such as pain, but also from functional limitations that affect their quality of life. In addition to symptom-alleviating interventions, rehabilitative measures are also part of the palliative concept. In pain treatment, age-adapted adjustments to the medication are to be considered and the multidimensionality of the pain experience must be taken into account. In the case of cognitive impairment, appropriate observation tools help to identify possible pain. In the context of dementia, palliative treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms should be considered if the patient suffers from them.

Advance care planning and the ethical obligation of death literacy as a public health initiative in India.

This article highlights the importance of advance care planning (ACP) in good end-of-life care (EOLC). The judgement by the Supreme Court of India legalised Advance Medical Directives in 2018 and in January 2023, amended the procedure to make it easier. The article describes the advantages of ACP, the numerous ethical dilemmas at the end of life that it seeks to address and avoid, the latest legal procedure, the barriers, the need for awareness among healthcare providers, legal professionals as well as the public, and the need for legislation to translate the law into action. Educating citizens about their right to choose the kind of care they want at the end of life, including the right to refuse treatment, is the moral and ethical duty of all health professionals. Making death literacy and ACP a part of a public health initiative would be a major step towards meeting the obligations reflected in the World Health Organization guidelines and National Health Policy 2017, which envisage palliative care and EOLC as an integral part of Universal Health Coverage, requiring support from the government as well as the participation of civil society.

The effect of frailty on mortality and hospital admission in patients with benign pleural disease in Wales: a cohort study

Pleural disease is common, representing 5% of the acute medical workload, and its incidence is rising, partly due to the ageing population. Frailty is an important feature and little is known about disease progression in patients with frailty and pleural disease. We aimed to examine the effect of frailty on mortality and other relevant outcomes in patients diagnosed with pleural disease. In this cohort study in Wales, the national Secure Anonymised Information Linkage databank was used to identify a cohort of individuals diagnosed with non-malignant pleural disease between Jan 1, 2005, and March 1, 2023, who were not known to have left Wales. Frailty was assessed at diagnosis of pleural disease using an electronic Frailty Index. The primary outcome was time from diagnosis to all-cause mortality for all patients. Data were analysed using multilevel mixed-effects Cox proportional hazards regression adjusting for the prespecified covariates of age, sex, Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation quintile, smoking status, comorbidity, and subtype of pleural disease. 54 566individuals were included in the final sample (median age 66years [IQR 47-77]; 26 477 [48·5%] were female and 28 089 [51·5%] were male). By the end of the study period, 25 698 (47·1%) participants had died, with a median follow-up of 1·0years (IQR 0·2-3·6). There was an association between frailty and all-cause mortality, which increased as frailty worsened. Compared with fit individuals, there was increasing mortality for those with mild frailty (adjusted hazard ratio 1·11 [95% CI 1·08-1·15]; p<0·0001), moderate frailty (1·25 [1·20-1·31]; p<0·0001), and severe frailty (1·36 [1·28-1·44]; p<0·0001). Independent of age and comorbidities, frailty status at diagnosis of pleural disease appeared to be useful as a prognostic indicator. Patients with moderate or severe frailty had a rapid decline in health. Future patients should be assessed for frailty at the time of diagnosis of pleural disease and might benefit from optimised care and advance care planning. Cardiff University's Wellcome Trust iTPA funding award.

Nurses' engagement in advance care planning practices: A descriptive cross-sectional study.

To describe and compare nurses' awareness of, attitudes toward, and participation in advance care planning, as well as related facilitators and challenges, in four types of healthcare settings. A cross-sectional descriptive study. Four hundred and ninety-eight registered nurses from tertiary, secondary and primary healthcare institutions, along with long-term care centres in South Korea, participated in an investigator-developed online survey. The collected data were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-squared test, one-way ANOVA, and binary logistic regression. Participants were on average 30.6 ± 7.3 years old, mostly female (95.4%), employed as staff nurses (95.4%), held bachelor's degrees or higher (84.1%), and had worked for less than 5 years at their current institutions (69.7%). Overall, 49% of the participants were familiar with advance care planning. While most participants supported nurse involvement in advance care planning with patients and surrogates, fewer were willing to engage or recommend it. Less than half were actively engaged in advance care planning practices. A notable challenge was the lack of time due to excessive workload. Compared to those from tertiary healthcare institutions, participants from secondary and primary healthcare institutions and long-term care centres were less likely to be aware of advance care planning. Participants from secondary and primary healthcare institutions had lower odds of checking for the presence of advance directives and the physician orders for life-sustaining treatment. Nurses demonstrated low awareness and participation in advance care planning. Nurses' insufficient time and competency to conduct advance care planning in their practice should be addressed. Educational programs, initiatives (e.g. guidelines, position statements) and legal and policy-level efforts (e.g. nurse staffing, role clarification, reimbursement) are crucial to incorporate advance care planning into routine nursing practice. What problem did the study address? Nurses play an important role in advance care planning; however, limited is understood about their readiness and involvement in such practices. What were the main findings? Nurses' awareness of advance care planning practices and their participation in such practices is low across care settings. Although nurses have a positive attitude toward advance care planning, there are challenges (e.g. insufficient time to conduct advance care planning discussions and lack of relevant knowledge and skills) that impede their participation in practice. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? This study may serve as a foundation for nursing societies in countries, where advance care planning is emerging, to discuss strategies to increase nurses' competency in advance care planning and promote their participation in the practice. The STROBE checklist was followed. No patient or public contribution.

Advance directives in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis – a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease of the upper and lower motoneuron. It is associated with a life expectancy of 2–4 years after diagnosis. Individuals experience paralysis, dysphagia, respiratory failure and loss of communicative function, rendering advance care planning (ACP) critically important. This systematic review primarily aimed to internationally compare the application of advance directives (AD) and ACP in ALS. Its secondary aim was to identify ACP preferences, identify fields for future research and to generate recommendations for improving patient care through ACP.MethodsWe conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Five electronic databases (Embase, Medline, Scopus, PsycInfo and CENTRAL) were searched for qualitative and quantitative primary literature from 1999 to 2024. Cross-references were used to identify additional publications. Study selection was performed based on inclusion criteria. Number and content of AD were extracted systematically. After statistical analysis consecutive meta-analysis was performed for international differences and changes over time. Quality assessment of studies was performed using the MMAT (Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool). PROSPERO Registration (June 07, 2021) : CRD42021248040.ResultsA total of 998 records was screened of which 26 were included in the synthesis. An increase in publication numbers of 88.9% was observed from 1999 to 2024. Results regarding use and content of AD were heterogeneous and international differences were detected. AD were signed in 60.4% of records (1,629 / 2,696 patients). The number of AD decreased over time when separating the review period in two decades (1st 1999–2011: 78% vs. 2nd 2012–2024: 42%). Study quality was superior in qualitative and mixed method designs compared to quantitative studies.ConclusionFurther prospective studies should include detailed analyses on preferences regarding ventilation and artificial nutrition in ALS and should encompass countries of the global south. Despite the complexity of ACP with regard to individual patient needs, ACP should be part of each individual support plan for ALS patients and should specifically comprise a discussion on the preferred place of death. The available disease-specific AD documents should be preferred.

Community-Based Interventions in People with Palliative Care Needs: An Integrative Review of Studies from 2017 to 2022.

To describe the latest scientific evidence regarding community-based interventions performed on patients in need of palliative care worldwide. Given the rise of chronic diseases, their complexities and the fragility of patients, we are facing around 56.8 million people in need of palliative care. Community-based healthcare, particularly palliative care, can address social inequalities and improve the biopsychosocial health of disadvantaged populations. Therefore, primary care, as the main health referent in the community, has a central role in the care of these patients. This is an integrative review from January 2017 to June 2022 that follows the PRISMA statement and has been registered in PROSPERO. PubMed, Cuiden, the Web of Science (WoS), Cochrane and LILACS were the five databases searched. The scientific quality assessment of the articles was carried out following the CASPe methodology. Study selection was carried out by two researchers, A.V.L. and J.M.C.T., using the inclusion and exclusion criteria mentioned below. In cases of doubt or discrepancy, a third author (J.R.S.) was consulted. The interventions mentioned in the 16 articles analysed were classified under the following categories: music therapy, laughter therapy, spiritual and cognitive interventions, aromatherapy, interdisciplinary and community-based teams, advance care planning and community, volunteering, telemedicine and care mapping. Educating people to talk about different ethical issues could improve their quality of life and help develop more compassionate cities. We have identified interventions that are easily accessible (laughter therapy, telemedicine or music therapy), simple enough to be carried out at the community level and do not incur high costs. This is why they are recommended for people with palliative care needs in order to improve their quality of life.

Cross-disciplinary advance care planning in oncology and palliative care amidst a pandemic: a best practice implementation project.

Advance care planning (ACP) ensures that patients receive medical care aligned with their values, goals, and preferences, especially regarding end-of-life decisions in serious chronic illnesses. This project aimed to introduce and promote evidence-based ACP in oncology and palliative care at a midsized hospital near Berlin, Germany, during the COVID-19 pandemic. This project was guided by the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework and used a mixed methods audit cycle. A baseline audit was conducted using qualitative interviews and workshops with representatives from all the health care disciplines involved in oncology and palliative care at the hospital. The findings were compared with eight best practice recommendations. Targeted strategies aimed at the key stakeholders involved in ACP practice were then implemented. Finally, a semi-quantitative questionnaire was used in a follow-up audit with the same participants as in the baseline audit. The baseline audit revealed a high level of familiarity with the concept of ACP. However, there was a lack of a uniformly accepted definition and understanding of ACP among the health care professionals, leading to a lack of coordination in task distribution. The follow-up audit revealed improvements with regard to education and training in ACP (Criterion 1: 50% to 100%) and organizational support to facilitate ACP conversations (Criterion 3: 87.5% to 100%). Other audit criteria compliance rates remained unchanged. Clinical education and team-based process analysis can facilitate ACP implementation across disciplines in oncology and palliative care facilities. However, the project did not succeed in implementing lasting changes in clinical processes and best practice ACP due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Such an endeavor would demand considerable resources and time, both of which were constrained during the pandemic. http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A236.