-We examined use of brood-rearing sites by female Black Brant (Branta bernicla nigricans) that nested at Tutakoke River, Alaska, 1987 to 1993. Adult females exhibited fidelity to brood-rearing sites; however, we observed site-specific and annual variation in movements among sites. Site fidelity of adults was not related to their hatching date, and hatching dates of females did not vary among brood-rearing sites, suggesting that site selection was unaffected by competition. Movement among sites was affected by distance between sites, but this relationship varied annually and among sites. Variation in forage characteristics may affect movements among sites. Natal-site fidelity was equal to fidelity probability of adults, indicating social inheritance of sites and perhaps facilitation through nepotism. We observed heterogeneity in survival probabilities of goslings and adults among sites. For goslings, heterogeneity in survival was probably related to variation in growth. We observed no relationship between hatching date and use of brood-rearing sites. Previously documented seasonal declines in growth of goslings are more likely affected by declines in forage quality and abundance than by site-specific variation in forage characteristics because use of brood-rearing sites was not related to hatching dates. Received 23 April 1997, accepted 11 November 1997. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS that precocial young experience before fledging may affect their growth, survival, and future fecundity (Sedinger et al. 1995). The relationship between environment and fitness is particularly evident in northern latitudes where growing seasons are short. Fitness of geese nesting in arctic and subarctic regions is affected by seasonal (Sedinger and Raveling 1986) and spatial variation (Cooch et al. 1993) in forage quality and abundance. Goslings hatching late grow slower (Cooch et al. 1991, Sedinger and Flint 1991, Lindholm et al. 1994) and have lower survival and fecundity than goslings hatching early (Sedinger et al. 1995). Growth of young Lesser Snow Geese (Chen c. caerulescens) and Barnacle Geese (Branta leucopsis) varies among brood-rearing sites (Larsson and Forslund 1991, Cooch et al. 1993). Spatial variation in habitat quality may lead to heterogeneity in survival and subsequent reproductive performance (Cooch et al. 1993, Rockwell et. al. 1993). In addition, fidelity to natal sites may cause genetic-environmental covariance and inflated estimates of heritability I Present address: Institute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited, Inc., One Waterfowl Way, Memphis, Tennessee 38120, USA. E-mail: mlindberg@ducks.org for growth metrics (Larsson and Forslund 1992). Although the distribution of goslings among brood-rearing sites affects the fitness of these birds, the use of brood-rearing habitats and factors affecting the distribution of birds during brood rearing are poorly described. The distribution of birds among habitats may be influenced by fitness costs and benefits associated with those habitats (Nichols et al. 1983). Birds should occupy the highest quality habitats, but by using these habitats, they may decrease habitat quality. As habitat quality declines, birds should select unoccupied habitats of similar quality as the habitat currently occupied (Fretwell 1972). If all birds occupy habitats of similar suitability, then their distribution may be described as ideal free (Fretwell and Lucas 1970). In an ideal free distribution, all individuals would have similar fitness. The pattern of habitat selection in geese may be particularly complex because geese may initially improve the quality of the habitat through fecal nitrogen deposition, which increases aboveground primary productivity (Hik and Jefferies 1990). Furthermore, movements among habitats may be opposed by competition with conspecifics. Alternatively, advantages of site familiarity may favor fidelity. Ecological advantages of site fidelity and resulting site familiar-
Read full abstract