In recent years, with rising inflation and decreasing financial support from taxpayers, it has been necessary for states to assess probation supervision fees as a means of revenue. Critics of the probation service fee have cited the potential negative effects of fee collection on both the probationer and society. However, these criticisms have received only minimal examination by probation officials. Five of these arguments are examined in light of the evidence from a large metropolitan adult probation department. The results provide little support for the objections outlined against collection of fees. In fact, counter arguments are given with supporting evidence to illustrate the potential gains for probation services when fees are collected.