Stranger in the Nest David B. Cohen John Wiley and Sons Ltd John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1999, ISBN: 0471319228 Where do children's (and adults) personality, intelligence and character come from? Many questions of social policy, such as the origins and cures for poverty, depend on this question. Other questions anthropologists care about, such as how much can differences in cultural rearing patterns affect children's behavior (and hence their behavior when they become adults) depend on this. Thus, this is more than a book about parenting. How often do parents, having tried to raise the perfect child, one that reflects their values and goals, find that they have a "Stranger in the Nest", a child that turns out not to be one that reflects their values (including those of their culture) and desires? This happen often, and explain the title of the new book by University of Texas psychologist, David B. Cohen. The basic message of the book is given by the sub-title "Do Parents Really Shape their Child's Personality, Intelligence, or Character", with the answer a resounding No. Instead the book emphasizes the role of genetic and pre-natal events in shaping intelligence and personality. The book puts the emphasis on the good news for parents whose children have turned out other than as they would wish. It points out how many diseases and character faults were once blamed on poor parenting, but are now regarded as due to biological causes that parents can not be blamed for. The evidence for these conclusions comes from family studies, especially those of twins and adopted children. Cohen also points to the common observation that siblings, even same sex siblings, are radically different, both in personality and intelligence (sibling IQ differences average 12 points, which is 70% of the 18 point difference among children randomly selected from the same population). This is hard to explain by traditional social rearing theories, since parents usually raise their children in the same way. Yet it is easily explained by a genetic theory (perhaps supplemented by there being a random component in development, such as Miller 1997 has proposed). Some of best-documented genetic effects are for intelligence. Behavior genetics makes it possible to partition the environmental influence into that due to being reared in the same family (referred to as shared variance) and that due to other causes. One of the most striking findings is that the familial influences are so weak. Identical twins raised apart correlate about .75, while those reared together correlate .85. This suggests the effect of being reared together given identical genes is only .1, really quite small. As small as this is, studies of the IQ resemblance of unrelated children adopted into the same household show that they have essentially zero IQ, resemblance. This suggests that the effect of being reared in the same family is essentially zero. Most of the environmental effects documented (and behavior genetic methods do prove that there are environmental effects) appear to be due to things that siblings within the same family do not share. (Rowe 1994 presents much evidence for this). Supporting evidence for the role of genes is provided by many findings. Brain size correlates with IQ; ability tests done at 6 months (before most environmental influences have had a chance to exercise their effects) correlate with childhood IO; adult IQ correlates with the biological relatives of adoptees, but not with that of the adoptive parents, and IQ correlates with reaction times. For more on these correlations see Miller's (1999) review and summary of Jensen's (1998) recent book in this journal, or the review and summary (Miller 1996) of Brand's book (Brand, 1996) also called The g Factor. Interestingly, the publisher of Cohen's book is the same Wiley that withdrew Brand's book from the book stores, apparently because it discussed scientific facts about racial differences in intelligence they did not want discussed. …