Adult Cardiac Surgery Research Articles

Simulation-based training in cardiac surgery: a systematic review.

The increase in the complexity of operations, the rising quest for improved outcomes and the scrutiny of surgical practice and its associated complications, have led to a decreased educational value of in-patient surgical training within cardiac surgery. Simulation-based training has emerged as an adjunct to the apprenticeship model. In the following review, we aimed to evaluate the currently available evidence regarding simulation-based training in cardiac surgery. A systematic database search was conducted as per PRISMA guidelines, of original articles that explored the use of simulation-based training in adult cardiac surgery programs in EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane database and Google Scholar, from inception to 2022. Data extraction covered the study characteristics, simulation modality, main methodology and main outcomes. Our search yielded 341 articles, of which 28 studies were included in this review. Three main areas of focus were identified: 1) Validity testing of the models; 2) Impact on surgeons' skills; and 3) Impact on clinical practice. 14 studies reported animal-based models and 14 reported on non-tissue-based models covering a wide spectrum of surgical operations. The results of the included studies suggest that validity assessment is scarce within the field, being carried out for only 4 of the models. Nonetheless, all studies reported improvement in trainees' confidence, clinical knowledge, and surgical skills (including accuracy, speed, dexterity) of trainees both at senior and junior levels. The direct clinical impact included initiation of minimally invasive programmes and improved board exam pass rates, and creating positive behavioural changes to minimise further cardiovascular risk. Surgical simulation has been shown to provide substantial benefits to trainees. Further evidence is needed to explore its direct impact on clinical practice.

Comparison of regional anesthetic techniques for postoperative analgesia after adult cardiac surgery: bayesian network meta-analysis.

Patients usually suffer acute pain after cardiac surgery. Numerous regional anesthetic techniques have been used for those patients under general anesthesia. The most effective regional anesthetic technique was still unclear. Five databases were searched, including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library. The efficiency outcomes were pain scores, cumulative morphine consumption, and the need for rescue analgesia in this Bayesian analysis. Postoperative nausea, vomiting and pruritus were safety outcomes. Functional outcomes included the time to tracheal extubation, ICU stay, hospital stay, and mortality. This meta-analysis included 65 randomized controlled trials involving 5,013 patients. Eight regional anesthetic techniques were involved, including thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), erector spinae plane block, and transversus thoracic muscle plane block. Compared to controls (who have not received regional anesthetic techniques), TEA reduced the pain scores at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h both at rest and cough, decreased the rate of need for rescue analgesia (OR = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.016-0.55), shortened the time to tracheal extubation (MD = -181.55, 95% CI: -243.05 to -121.33) and the duration of hospital stay (MD = -0.73, 95% CI: -1.22 to -0.24). Erector spinae plane block reduced the pain score 6 h at rest and the risk of pruritus, shortened the duration of ICU stay compared to controls. Transversus thoracic muscle plane block reduced the pain scores 6 and 12 h at rest compared to controls. The cumulative morphine consumption of each technique was similar at 24, 48 h. Other outcomes were also similar among these regional anesthetic techniques. TEA seems the most effective regional postoperative anesthesia for patients after cardiac surgery by reducing the pain scores and decreasing the rate of need for rescue analgesia. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, ID: CRD42021276645.

Comparative analysis of machine learning vs. traditional modeling approaches for predicting in-hospital mortality after cardiac surgery: temporal and spatial external validation based on a nationwide cardiac surgery registry.

Preoperative risk assessment is crucial for cardiac surgery. Although previous studies suggested machine learning (ML) may improve in-hospital mortality predictions after cardiac surgery compared to traditional modeling approaches, the validity is doubted due to lacking external validation, limited sample sizes, and inadequate modeling considerations. We aimed to assess predictive performance between ML and traditional modelling approaches, while addressing these major limitations. Adult cardiac surgery cases (n=168565) between 2013 and 2018 in the Chinese Cardiac Surgery Registry were used to develop, validate, and compare various ML vs. logistic regression (LR) models. The dataset was split for temporal (2013-2017 for training, 2018 for testing) and spatial (geographically-stratified random selection of 83 centers for training, 22 for testing) experiments, respectively. Model performances were evaluated in testing sets for discrimination and calibration. The overall in-hospital mortality was 1.9%. In the temporal testing set (n=32184), the best-performing ML model demonstrated a similar area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.797 (95% CI 0.779-0.815) to the LR model (AUC 0.791 [95% CI 0.775-0.808]; P=0.12). In the spatial experiment (n=28323), the best ML model showed a statistically better but modest performance improvement (AUC 0.732 [95% CI 0.710-0.754]) than LR (AUC 0.713 [95% CI 0.691-0.737]; P=0.002). Varying feature selection methods had relatively smaller effects on ML models. Most ML and LR models were significantly miscalibrated. ML provided only marginal improvements over traditional modelling approaches in predicting cardiac surgery mortality with routine preoperative variables, which calls for more judicious use of ML in practice.

A comparison of the national surgical quality improvement program and the society of thoracic surgery cardiac surgery preoperative risk models: A cohort study.

Cardiac surgery prediction models and outcomes from the ACS-NSQIP have not been reported. We sought to develop preoperative prediction models and estimates of postoperative outcomes for cardiac surgery using the ACS-NSQIP and compare these to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (STS-ACSD). In a retrospective analysis of the ACS-NSQIP data (2007-2018), cardiac operations were identified using cardiac surgeon primary specialty and sorted into cohorts of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) only, valve surgery only, and valve+CABG operations using CPT codes. Prediction models were created using backward selection of the 28 nonlaboratory preoperative variables in ACS-NSQIP. Rates of 9 postoperative outcomes and performance statistics of these models were compared to published STS 2018 data. Of 28,912 cardiac surgery patients, 18,139 (62.8%) were CABG only, 7,872 (27.2%) were valve only, and 2,901 (10.0%) were valve+CABG. Most outcome rates were similar between the ACS-NSQIP and STS-ACSD, except for lower rates of prolonged ventilation and composite morbidity and higher reoperation rates in ACS-NSQIP (all P<0.0001). For all 27 comparisons (9 outcomes x 3 operation groups), the c-indices for the ACS-NSQIP models were lower by an average of ~0.05 than the reported STS models. The ACS-NSQIP preoperative risk models for cardiac surgery were almost as accurate as the STS-ACSD models. Slight differences in c-indexes could be due to more predictor variables in STS-ACSD models or the use of more disease- and operation-specific risk variables in the STS-ACSD models.

P290 EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE OXYGENATION SYSTEM AS A BRIDGE TO REPARATIVE SURGERY IN VENTRICULAR SEPTAL DEFECT COMPLICATING ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

Abstract Introduction Post–infarct ventricular septal defect (VSD) is a life tethering complication of acute myocardial infarction which is associated to high in–hospital mortality (90–95%). The optimal peri–operative management including timing of surgical correction is still debated. There is a large body of evidence demonstrating that surgical repair is also associated to poor post–operative outcomes due to cardiogenic shock and multiorgan failure (MOF). The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) system in adult cardiac surgery is not routine, occurring in a minority of critically ill patients, typically postoperatively. Here we present our single centre experience of patients with post–infarct VSD managed preoperatively with ECMO support as a bridge to definitive surgical closure. Materials and methods Between February 2020 to July 2021, 5 patients presented to our unit with diagnosis of post–infarct VSD and were managed with preoperative veno–arterial (V–A) ECMO implantation and enrolled in our study. Clinical parameters (such as mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure, ECG, pulmonary artery pressure), blood tests, trans–thoracic and trans–esophageal echocardiography, chest X–rays have been evaluated both before and after surgery. Primary end–point was all causes in–hospital mortality. Results Three (60%) patients were male and mean age was 70,4 (60–78) years. All patients underwent surgical repair. ECMO was positioned between 1 and 9 days prior to surgical correction, giving the chance to reduce the pharmacological inotropic support while still reverting the MOF as demonstrated by the reduction of AST, ALT, bilirubin level, decreased CVP and systemic lactate levels. Two (40%) patients were successfully weaned off from the mechanical support and discharged home in good clinical conditions. Two (40%) patients developed MOF after surgery leading to the exitus. Conclusions We postulate that the use of V–A use preoperatively in patients with cardiogenic shock secondary to post–infarct VSD is appropriate and where feasible should be considered. It allows restoration of haemodynamic stability and resolution of MOF. This provides for a delayed surgical repair with a likely higher chance of operative success and reduced mortality.

A primer for the student joining the adult cardiac surgery service tomorrow: Primer 1 of 7

A primer for the student joining the adult cardiac surgery service tomorrow: Primer 1 of 7

The impact of reoperative surgery on aortic root replacement in the United States

ObjectiveReoperative sternotomy is associated with poor outcomes after cardiac surgery. We aimed to investigate the impact of reoperative sternotomy on the outcomes after aortic root replacement. MethodsAll patients who underwent aortic root replacement from January 2011 to June 2020 were identified using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. We compared outcomes between patients who underwent first-time aortic root replacement with those with a history of sternotomy undergoing reoperative sternotomy aortic root replacement using propensity score matching. Subgroup analysis was performed among the reoperative sternotomy aortic root replacement group. ResultsA total of 56,447 patients underwent aortic root replacement. Among them, 14,935 (26.5%) underwent reoperative sternotomy aortic root replacement. The annual incidence of reoperative sternotomy aortic root replacement increased from 542 in 2011 to 2300 in 2019. Aneurysm and dissection were more frequently observed in the first-time aortic root replacement group, whereas infective endocarditis was more common in the reoperative sternotomy aortic root replacement group. Propensity score matching yielded 9568 pairs in each group. Cardiopulmonary bypass time was longer in the reoperative sternotomy aortic root replacement group (215 vs 179 minutes, standardized mean difference = 0.43). Operative mortality was higher in the reoperative sternotomy aortic root replacement group (10.8% vs 6.2%, standardized mean difference = 0.17). In the subgroup analysis, logistic regression demonstrated that individual patient repetition of (second or more resternotomy) surgery and annual institutional volume of aortic root replacement were independently associated with operative mortality. ConclusionsThe incidence of reoperative sternotomy aortic root replacement might have increased over time. Reoperative sternotomy is a significant risk factor for morbidity and mortality in aortic root replacement. Referral to high-volume aortic centers should be considered in patients undergoing reoperative sternotomy aortic root replacement.

Quality and Impact of Manuscripts Using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Databases

BackgroundThe Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) National Databases contain the largest and most comprehensive cardiac, thoracic, and congenital surgery data available. In this analysis characteristics of manuscripts that used the STS National Databases were examined to evaluate the quality and impact of these publications. MethodsManuscripts published from 2010 to 2020 that used the STS National Databases (Adult Cardiac, General Thoracic, and Congenital Heart Surgery) were examined. The number of times cited per published manuscript, journal of publication, and journal CiteScore were assessed. Author characteristics, including institutional association and h-index, were evaluated for first and last authors. ResultsOf 539 published manuscripts, 179 (33.2%) used the Adult Cardiac Surgery, 128 (23.7%) the Congenital Heart Surgery, 85 (15.8%) the General Thoracic Surgery, and 136 (25.2%) used unspecified STS National Databases. Collectively the analyzed manuscripts were cited 18,943 times, with a mean of 35.1 (range, 0-528) citations per manuscript. Manuscripts were published in 97 journals with a mean year-adjusted CiteScore of 5.6 (range, 0.1-60.2). Authors associated with 361 institutions contributed to published manuscripts. The mean h-index of first authors was 24.6 (range, 0-100) and of last authors was 44.1 (range, 0-164). From 2010 to 2020 first authors wrote a mean of 1.6 (range, 1-31) and last authors wrote a mean of 1.9 (range, 1-29) STS National Databases publications. ConclusionsThe STS National Databases are some of the most robust data collection sources available to cardiothoracic surgeons. These data have enabled valuable research in respected journals from authors of varying experience levels.

Impact of a quality improvement initiative with a dedicated anesthesia team on outcomes after surgery for adult congenital heart disease

ObjectivesA quality improvement initiative was introduced to the adult congenital cardiac surgery program at Toronto General Hospital in January 2016. A dedicated Adult Congenital Anesthesia and intensive care unit team was introduced within the cardiac group. The use of factor concentrates was introduced. The study compares perioperative mortality, adverse events, and transfusion burden before and after this process change. MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of all adult congenital cardiac surgeries from January 2004 to July 2019. Two groups were analyzed: patients undergoing operation before and after 2016. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. One-year mortality and prevalence of key morbidities were analyzed as secondary outcomes. A separate analysis looked at patients who had and had not attended an anesthesia-led preassessment clinic. ResultsIn-hospital mortality was significantly reduced in patients undergoing operation after 2016 (1.1% vs 4.3%, P = .003) despite a higher risk profile. One-year mortality (1.3% vs 5.8%, P = .003) and ventilation times (5.5 hours [3.4-13.0] vs 6.3 hours [4.2-16.2], P = .001) were also reduced. The incidence of stroke and renal failure was similar between groups. Blood product exposure was comparable, but the incidence of chest reopening decreased (1.8% vs 4.8%, P = .022), despite more patients with multiple previous chest wall incisions, on anticoagulation, and with more complex cardiac anatomy. There were no significant outcome differences between those who did or did not attend the preassessment clinic. ConclusionsBoth in-hospital and 1-year mortality were significantly reduced after the introduction of a quality improvement program, despite a higher risk profile. Blood product exposure remained unchanged, but there were less chest reopenings.

Outcome Comparison Between Insulin-Dependent and Non Insulin-Dependent Patients after Open Adult Cardiac Surgery

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; Insulin-dependent diabetic patients usually have poor glycemic control and higher risk of complications than non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients. However, the difference in clinical outcomes between these two groups of patients who underwent open cardiac surgery was not established. Therefore, this study compares the short-term outcome of insulin vs non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients after open cardiac surgery in a large-scale study.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods:&lt;/strong&gt; The study design was a retrospective cohort. All adults who underwent open cardiac surgery between January 1&lt;sup&gt;st&lt;/sup&gt; 2016-December 31&lt;sup&gt;st&lt;/sup&gt; 2020 in 4 tertiary hospitals in Indonesia were included in the study. From a total of 4.931 samples included in the study, 3.753 patients were non-diabetic (Group I) and 1.178 were diabetic (Group II). Group II was divided into subgroup IIA (930 non-insulin-dependent) and subgroup IIB (248 insulin-dependent). The main outcome was in-hospital mortality of open cardiac surgery patients.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Result:&lt;/strong&gt; In-hospital mortality between group I and II had no significant difference (6.8% vs 5.7%; p = 0.188), as well as IIA and IIB (5.6% vs 6%; p = 0.782). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that diabetes did not increase mortality of open cardiac surgery (OR 0.665; p = 0.021). In-hospital mortality of subgroup IIB was higher than subgroup IIA, but insulin therapy did not increase the risk of in-hospital mortality (OR 1.259; p = 0.464).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; Both insulin-dependent and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus were not the predictors of poor short-term outcomes for open adult cardiac surgery patients.&lt;/p&gt;

Albumin Infusion and Blood Loss After Cardiac Surgery

BackgroundIn the recent ALBICS (ALBumin In Cardiac Surgery) trial, 4% albumin used for cardiopulmonary bypass priming and volume replacement increased perioperative bleeding compared with Ringer acetate. In the present exploratory study, albumin-related bleeding was further characterized. MethodsRinger acetate and 4% albumin were compared in a randomized, double-blinded fashion in 1386 on-pump adult cardiac surgery patients. The study end points for bleeding were the Universal Definition of Perioperative Bleeding (UDPB) class and its components. ResultsThe UDPB bleeding grades were higher in the albumin group than the Ringer group: “insignificant” (albumin vs Ringer: 47.5% vs 62.9%), “mild” (12.7% vs 8.9%), “moderate” (28.7% vs 24.4%), “severe” (10.2% vs 3.2%), and “massive” (0.9% vs. 0.6%; P < .001). Patients in the albumin group received red blood cells (45.2% vs 31.5%; odds ratio [OR], 1.80; 95% CI, 1.44-2.24; P < .001), platelets (33.3% vs 21.8%; OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.41-2.28; P < .001), and fibrinogen (5.6% vs 2.6%; OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.27-3.95; P < .05), and underwent resternotomy (5.3% vs 1.9%; OR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.55-5.60, P < .001) more often than patients in the Ringer group. The strongest predictors of bleeding were albumin group allocation (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.74-2.74) and complex (OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 2.02-3.37) and urgent surgery (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.26-2.13). In interaction analysis, the effect of albumin on the risk of bleeding was stronger in patients on preoperative acetylsalicylic acid. ConclusionsPerioperative administration of albumin, compared with Ringer’s acetate, resulted in increased blood loss and higher UDBP class. The magnitude of this effect was similar to the complexity and urgency of the surgery.

Patient-, Clinician-, and Institution-level Variation in Inotrope Use for Cardiac Surgery: A Multicenter Observational Analysis.

Conflicting evidence exists regarding the risks and benefits of inotropic therapies during cardiac surgery, and the extent of variation in clinical practice remains understudied. Therefore, the authors sought to quantify patient-, anesthesiologist-, and hospital-related contributions to variation in inotrope use. In this observational study, nonemergent adult cardiac surgeries using cardiopulmonary bypass were reviewed across a multicenter cohort of academic and community hospitals from 2014 to 2019. Patients who were moribund, receiving mechanical circulatory support, or receiving preoperative or home inotropes were excluded. The primary outcome was an inotrope infusion (epinephrine, dobutamine, milrinone, dopamine) administered for greater than 60 consecutive min intraoperatively or ongoing upon transport from the operating room. Institution-, clinician-, and patient-level variance components were studied. Among 51,085 cases across 611 attending anesthesiologists and 29 hospitals, 27,033 (52.9%) cases received at least one intraoperative inotrope, including 21,796 (42.7%) epinephrine, 6,360 (12.4%) milrinone, 2,000 (3.9%) dobutamine, and 602 (1.2%) dopamine (non-mutually exclusive). Variation in inotrope use was 22.6% attributable to the institution, 6.8% attributable to the primary attending anesthesiologist, and 70.6% attributable to the patient. The adjusted median odds ratio for the same patient receiving inotropes was 1.73 between 2 randomly selected clinicians and 3.55 between 2 randomly selected institutions. Factors most strongly associated with increased likelihood of inotrope use were institutional medical school affiliation (adjusted odds ratio, 6.2; 95% CI, 1.39 to 27.8), heart failure (adjusted odds ratio, 2.60; 95% CI, 2.46 to 2.76), pulmonary circulation disorder (adjusted odds ratio, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.58 to 1.87), loop diuretic home medication (adjusted odds ratio, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.42 to 1.69), Black race (adjusted odds ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.32 to 1.68), and digoxin home medication (adjusted odds ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.86). Variation in inotrope use during cardiac surgery is attributable to the institution and to the clinician, in addition to the patient. Variation across institutions and clinicians suggests a need for future quantitative and qualitative research to understand variation in inotrope use affecting outcomes and develop evidence-based, patient-centered inotrope therapies.

Expert Consensus on the Use of Human Serum Albumin in Adult Cardiac Surgery.

Expert Consensus on the Use of Human Serum Albumin in Adult Cardiac Surgery.

Center-Level Variation in Failure to Rescue After Elective Adult Cardiac Surgery

BackgroundThere has been increasing emphasis on evaluation of failure to rescue (FTR) after major inpatient operations. The present study characterized center-level variation in FTR within a national cohort of patients undergoing elective cardiac operations. MethodsAll adults undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting and/or valve operations were identified in the 2016-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. FTR was defined as in-hospital death after prolonged mechanical ventilation, stroke, reoperation, acute kidney injury requiring dialysis, sepsis, cardiac arrest or pulmonary embolism. Multi-level, mixed-effects regressions were used to model mortality, complications, and FTR. Centers with high hospital-specific rates of FTR (≥95th percentile) were identified and compared to others. ResultsOf an estimated 454,506 patients included for analysis, 32,537 (7.2%) developed at least 1 complication, and 7669 (1.7%) died before discharge. Overall, 5370 (16.5%) patients experienced FTR. Compared with those who developed ≥1 complication but survived to discharge, FTR patients were significantly older, more commonly female, and had a greater burden of comorbidities as measured by the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Risk-adjusted, hospital-specific rates of mortality and FTR were moderately correlated (r = 0.64), mortality and complications were weakly associated (r = 0.16), and complications and FTR exhibited a very weak relationship (r = –0.02). Relative to others, centers with high rates of FTR had lower annual cardiac surgical volume (median 61 [interquartile range 33-133] vs 80 [interquartile range 43-149] cases/y, P = .019). ConclusionsThe present findings affirm prior work demonstrating a close link between variation in FTR and mortality, but not complications. Further study is necessary to delineate modifiable care pathways that mitigate FTR.

Delayed Sternal Closure Using a Vacuum-Assisted Closure System in Adult Cardiac Surgery.

Delayed sternal closure (DSC) is a useful option for patients with intractable bleeding and hemodynamic instability due to prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass and a preoperative bleeding tendency. Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) has been widely used for sternal wound problems, but only rarely for DSC, and its efficacy for mediastinal drainage immediately after cardiac surgery has not been well established. Therefore, we evaluated the usefulness of DSC using VAC in adult cardiac surgery. We analyzed 33 patients who underwent DSC using VAC from January 2017 to July 2022. After packing sterile gauze around the heart surface and great vessels, VAC was applied directly without sternal self-retaining retractors and mediastinal drain tubes. Twenty-one patients (63.6%) underwent emergency surgery for conditions including type A acute aortic dissection (n=13), and 8 patients (24.2%) received postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Intractable bleeding (n=25) was the most common reason for an open sternum. The median duration of open sternum was 2 days (interquartile range [25th-75th pertentiles], 2-3.25 days) and 9 patients underwent VAC application more than once. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 27.3%. Superficial wound problems occurred in 10 patients (30.3%), and there were no deep sternal wound infections. For patients with an open sternum, VAC alone, which is effective for mediastinal drainage and cardiac decompression, had an acceptable superficial wound infection rate and no deep sternal wound infections. In adult cardiac surgery, DSC using VAC may be useful in patients with intractable bleeding or unstable hemodynamics with myocardial edema.

Association of Surgical Complications With Resource Utilization in Adult Congenital Cardiac Surgery

BackgroundAs patients with congenital heart disease are increasingly surviving well into adulthood, the morbidity, mortality, and resource utilization of adult congenital cardiac operations are of increasing interest. Therefore, we evaluated factors associated with perioperative morbidity and outcomes in adults undergoing congenital operations. MethodsThe Nationwide Readmissions Database was tabulated for all adults (≥18 years old) with congenital heart disease between 2010 and 2017. Congenital operations were identified by previously published International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision codes. Complications were selected on the basis of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons short list of complications. Multivariable regression models were used to assess adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and β coefficients for select clinical outcomes. ResultsOf 52,360 adults identified who underwent congenital cardiac operations, 14,123 (27%) suffered a complication. The presence of a complication increased the odds of index death (AOR, 11.46; 95% CI, 8.58-15.31), nonhome discharge (AOR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.91-2.29), 30-day readmission (AOR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.88-2.39), 90-day readmission (AOR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.94-2.43), costs (β, +$37,000; 95% CI, $34,000-$40,000), and hospital duration (β, +7.86 days; 95% CI, 7.3-8.4). ConclusionsPerioperative complications portend in-hospital death, resource use, and readmissions in adults undergoing congenital heart operations. As complications are present in 27% of this population, identification of risk stratification and complication-reducing strategies may improve patient morbidity, mortality, and resource utilization.

Chest X-ray Overuse in Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit per American College of Radiology Criteria

BackgroundA routine chest radiograph (CXR) is frequently incorporated into postoperative clinical pathways. Whereas prior studies evaluated CXR use for specific indications, overall CXR "stewardship" within cardiothoracic surgery remains undescribed. We characterized CXR use within a cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU) and quantified X-ray–driven changes in patient management. MethodsAll CXRs performed during 3 months in the cardiothoracic ICU of an academic 900-bed tertiary care hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Attending radiologist CXR reports and clinical history from ordering providers were manually reviewed to classify CXRs as indicated or not indicated by American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria. Multiple resident-level providers further reviewed CXRs to determine whether the image demonstrated any actionable or unexpected findings. ResultsBetween October 1, 2021, and January 3, 2022, 1273 CXRs were performed on adult cardiac and general thoracic surgery patients; the most common indication was routine daily (55.9%), followed by support device monitoring (12.4%) and new ICU transfer (10.4%). Only 34.3% of performed CXRs met ACR Appropriateness Criteria; 65.7% did not (P = .002). Only 3.8% of not indicated CXRs had actionable or significant findings vs 13.0% of indicated CXRs (P = .02). Of the 32 not indicated CXRs with actionable findings, 37.5% recommended endotracheal tube repositioning and 28.1% recommended other line or tube repositioning. ConclusionsCXRs are overused in the cardiothoracic ICU according to ACR Appropriateness Criteria. CXRs performed outside these guidelines have significantly fewer actionable or meaningful findings. Optimizing CXR use can improve resource utilization and efficiency in care of cardiothoracic surgical patients.

Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Adult Cardiac Surgery Pulsatile and Non-pulsatile Current Selection Effect on Cerebral NIRS

Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Adult Cardiac Surgery Pulsatile and Non-pulsatile Current Selection Effect on Cerebral NIRS

Technologic Transformation of Perioperative Cardiac Care and Outcomes

BackgroundThe “Perfect Care” initiative engages, educates, and enrolls adult cardiac surgery patients into a comprehensive program that incorporates remote perioperative monitoring (RPM). This study investigated the impact of RPM on postoperative length of stay, 30-day readmission and mortality, and other outcomes. MethodsThis quality improvement project compared outcomes in 354 consecutive patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass and who were enrolled in RPM between July 2019 and March 2022 at 2 centers against outcomes in propensity-matched control patients from a pool of 1301 patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass from April 2018 to March 2022 without RPM. Data were extracted from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database, and outcomes were analyzed according to its definitions. RPM used perioperative standard practice routines, a digital health kit for remote monitoring, a smartphone application and platform, and nurse navigators. Propensity scores were generated with RPM as the outcome measure, and a 2:1 match was generated using a nearest-neighbor matching algorithm. ResultsPatients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass and who were participating in RPM showed a statistically significant, 15.4% (1 day) reduction in postoperative length of stay (P < .0001) and a 44% reduction in 30-day readmission and mortality (P < .039) compared with matched control patients. Significantly more RPM participants were discharged directly home instead of to a facility (99.4% vs 92.0%; P < .0001). ConclusionsThe RPM platform and associated efforts to engage and monitor adult cardiac surgery patients remotely is feasible, is embraced by patients and clinicians, and transforms perioperative cardiac care by significantly improving outcomes and reducing variation.

Less transfusion is still more-red blood cell transfusion affects long-term mortality in cardiac surgery.

Previous studies indicated higher long-term mortality after the transfusion of allogeneic red blood cells and newer recommendations emphasize lower transfusion rates. Consequences of transfusion of red blood cells in cardiac surgery are unclear, as later studies focused on transfusion triggers and short-term outcomes and reports on long-term complications after cardiac surgery are few. The mandatory Western Denmark Heart Registry was used to identify all adult cardiac surgeries performed in four centres from 2000-2019. Patients with multiple entries or previous cardiac surgery, special/complex procedures, dying within 30 days and not eligible for follow-up were excluded. A total of 32,581 adult cardiac surgeries performed in four centres from 2000-2019 were included. The Kaplan-Meier survival plot for low-risk patients undergoing simple cardiac surgery showed a significantly lower 15-year survival (0.384 vs 0.661) when receiving perioperative red blood cell transfusion (OR 2.43 (CL 2.23-2.66)). The risk decreased with increasing comorbidity or age, and in high-risk patients, no difference was found. The adjusted risk ratio, after RBC transfusion, including age, sex, comorbidity and surgery, was 1.62 (1.48-1.77). Despite reduced transfusion rates, long-term follow-up on especially low-risk patients undergoing comparable cardiac surgery still demonstrates a substantially higher mortality in patients receiving perioperative red blood cell transfusion. Even transfusion of 1-2 units is associated with increased long-term mortality.