ADR-related Hospital Admissions Research Articles

Safety Assessment of Potentially Inappropriate Medications Use in Older People and the Factors Associated with Hospital Admission

Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIM) use in elderly people may be responsible for the development of Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) which, when severe, leads to hospital admissions. to estimate the prevalence of elderly who had used PIM before being admitted to hospital admission and to identify the risk factors and the hospitalizations related to ADR arising from PIM. A descriptive and cross-sectional study was performed in the internal medicine ward of a teaching hospital (Brazil), in 2008. With the aid of a validated form, patients aged ≥ 60 years, with length of hospital stay ≥ 24 hours, were interviewed about drugs taken prior to the hospital admission and the complaints/reasons for hospitalization. 19.1% (59/308) of older patients had taken PIM before hospital admission and in 4.9%; there were a causal relation between the PIM taken and the complaint reported. PIM responsible for admissions were: amiodarone, amitriptyline, cimetidine, clonidine, diazepam, digoxin, estrogen, fluoxetine, lorazepam, short-acting nifedipine and propranolol. 47.0% of the clinical manifestations of PIM-related ADR were: dizziness, fatigue, digoxin toxicity and erythema. Only polypharmacy was detected as a risk factor for the occurrence of ADR of PIM (p = 0.02). PIM use in elderly people is not a risk factor for ADR-related hospital admission. Probably, severe ADR, which lead to hospitalizations of older people, can be explained by idiosyncratic response or the predisposition of these patients to develop adverse drug events, whether or not drugs are classed as PIM.

Sex‐related differences in hospital admissions attributed to adverse drug reactions in the Netherlands

Women are more at risk for developing adverse drug reactions (ADRs) due to differences in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and drug use. ADRs regularly lead to hospital admissions. There are differences between the sexes in hospital admissions attributed to ADRs. The risk of being hospitalized with an ADR varies between the sexes in the type of reaction and the causative drug. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a major burden in health care, regularly leading to hospital admission, morbidity or death. Women tend to have a higher risk of adverse drug reactions with a 1.5 to 1.7-fold greater risk than men. Our primary aim was to study differences in ADR-related hospitalizations between the sexes. We conducted a nationwide study of all ADR-related hospitalizations in the period between 2000 and 2005 in the Netherlands, which were selected from all 9,287,162 hospital admissions in this period. ADR-drug group combinations with at least 50 admissions in one of the sexes were selected. Relative risks and confidence intervals were calculated with respect to total admissions and total prescriptions with men as reference. In total, 0.41% of the 4,236,368 admissions in men (95% CI 0.40, 0.42%) and 0.47% of the 5,050,794 admissions in women (95% CI 0.46, 0.48%) were attributed to an ADR by medical specialists (57% of all ADR-related admissions were in women). Differences between the sexes in risk for ADR-related hospitalization were found for antineoplastic and immunosuppressive drugs, antirheumatics, anticoagulants and salicylates, cardiovascular and neurological drugs, steroids and antibiotics. In certain drug categories, risks for hospitalization changed after taking into account total drug prescriptions. In all different drug classes, significant differences exist between the sexes in ADR-related hospital admissions. Cardiovascular drugs account for the most pronounced differences between men and women. More research is needed to explain the clear sex differences in ADR-related hospital admissions.

Adverse Drug Reactions Related Hospital Admissions in Persons Aged 60 Years and over, The Netherlands, 1981–2007: Less Rapid Increase, Different Drugs

BackgroundEpidemiologic information on time trends of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) and ADR-related hospitalizations is scarce. Over time, pharmacotherapy has become increasingly complex. Because of raised awareness of ADR, a decrease in ADR might be expected. The aim of this study was to determine trends in ADR-related hospitalizations in the older Dutch population.Methodology and Principal FindingsSecular trend analysis of ADR-related hospital admissions in patients ≥60 years between 1981 and 2007, using the National Hospital Discharge Registry of the Netherlands. Numbers, age-specific and age-adjusted incidence rates (per 10,000 persons) of ADR-related hospital admissions were used as outcome measures in each year of the study. Between 1981 and 2007, ADR-related hospital admissions in persons ≥60 years increased by 143%. The overall standardized incidence rate increased from 23.3 to 38.3 per 10,000 older persons. The increase was larger in males than in females. Since 1997, the increase in incidence rates of ADR-related hospitalizations flattened (percentage annual change 0.65%), compared to the period 1981–1996 (percentage annual change 2.56%).Conclusion/SignificanceADR-related hospital admissions in older persons have shown a rapidly increasing trend in the Netherlands over the last three decades with a temporization since 1997. Although an encouraging flattening in the increasing trend of ADR-related admissions was found around 1997, the incidence is still rising, which warrants sustained attention to this problem.

Adverse drug reactions as a cause of hospital admissions: A 6-month experience in a single center in Greece

Background Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Methods A prospective study was conducted over a 6-month period. All patients consecutively admitted were enrolled in the study. Analysis included: (1) an evaluation of the frequency of ADR-related hospital admissions and their causality, severity, and preventability; (2) a description of the type of drugs involved; (3) a report of the most common clinical manifestations related to these ADRs; and (4) an assessment of the factors that were predictive of ADRs. Results Seventy of the 548 admissions (12.8%) were related to an ADR. Hemorrhage represented the most common ADR (37.3%), followed by metabolic and renal events (10.8% each). The drugs most often involved were non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), followed by diuretics, aspirin, oral anticoagulants, and oral hypoglycemic agents. A comparison between ADR and non-ADR-related admissions showed that mean number of medications and age were significantly higher for patients admitted for an ADR than for those who were not. Gender, chronic disease at admission, days of hospitalization, cognitive impairment, renal insufficiency, physical activity impairment, and use of psychoactive drugs did not differ between the two groups. In the multivariate analysis, number of drugs was the only independent predictor of ADR-related hospital admission (OR = 1.064, 95% CI 1.019–1.109). In 13 of 70 (18.6%) ADR-related hospital admissions, ADRs were coded as severe. Conclusions ADRs are common causes of hospital admissions and may have important consequences. The most important determinant for ADR-related hospital admissions is the number of drugs taken.

Prevalence, Clinical Features and Avoidability of Adverse Drug Reactions as Cause of Admission to??a??Geriatric Unit

Drug use increases with advancing age, and in older patients it is associated with an increase in adverse drug reactions (ADRs). ADRs are a primary cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. To evaluate the prevalence, clinical characteristics and avoidability of ADR-related hospital admissions in elderly patients. From November 2004 to December 2005, all patients aged >or=65 years consecutively admitted to the Geriatric Unit of the Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo in Italy, were evaluated for enrolment in the study. ADRs were defined according to the WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology system. Drugs were classified according to Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system. The Naranjo algorithm was used to evaluate the relationship between drug use and the ADR (definite, probable, possible or doubtful) and Hallas criteria were used to evaluate the avoidability of the ADR (definitely avoidable, possibly avoidable or unavoidable). All cases of a suspected ADR were discussed by a team trained in drug safety, including three geriatricians, one clinical pharmacologist and one pharmacist. Only cases of an ADR with an agreement >or=80% were included. Of the 1756 patients observed, 102 (5.8%, 42 males, 60 females, mean age 76.5 +/- 7.4 years, range 65-93 years) showed certain (6.8%) or probable (91.2%) ADR-related hospitalization. Gastrointestinal disorders (48 patients, 47.1%); platelet, bleeding and clotting disorders (20 patients, 19.6%); and cardiovascular disorders (13 patients, 12.7%) were the most frequent ADRs. NSAIDs (23.5%), oral anticoagulants (20.6%), low-dose aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) [13.7%] and digoxin (12.7%) were the drugs most frequently involved in ADRs. Of the ADRs, 45.1% were defined as definitely avoidable, 31.4% as possibly avoidable, 18.6% as unavoidable and 4.9% as unclassifiable. Of 78 patients with definitely or possibly avoidable ADRs, 17 patients (21.8%) had received an inappropriate prescription, 29 patients (37.2%) had not received a prescription for an effective gastroprotective drug concomitantly with NSAID or low-dose aspirin treatment and 32 patients (41%) were not monitored during drug treatment. In the elderly, almost 6% of hospitalizations are ADR related. Most of these ADRs are potentially avoidable. Strategies that reduce inappropriate prescriptions and monitoring errors, as well as improving active prevention of ADRs, are needed in elderly subjects.

Adverse drug reactions causing hospitalization can be monitored from computerized medical records and thereby indicate the quality of drug utilization

To use computerized medical records to study the frequency of adverse drug reactions (ADR) as a cause for acute admission to a university hospital. Computerized medical records in 168 consecutively acutely admitted cases to a short-term internal medicine ward at a university hospital were retrospectively evaluated to see if an ADR could have caused the admission. In 18 cases (11%), an ADR was judged to be the reason for acute admission to the hospital. Augmented pharmacological effects (type A reactions) accounted for 89% of the cases. An additional eight cases (5%) were intentional intoxications with prescription drugs. ADR-associated hospital admissions were age-related (average age 72 compared to 65 in patients admitted for other reasons) and also associated with poly-pharmacy (8.3 drugs compared to 5.2). The ADR was considered to arise from a drug-drug interaction in four cases (22%). Although all ADRs fulfilled the criteria for mandatory reporting, none of them were reported to the Swedish Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee (SADRAC). The observed frequency of ADR-related acute hospital admissions in this pilot study is similar to earlier reported data from Sweden and abroad. Almost all of these reactions were known pharmacological (type A) reactions and many therefore theoretically preventable. In contrast to many prospective and costly studies, this retrospective analysis of computerized medical records offered a simple method that can be used in routine health care and also serve as an indicator of the quality of drug use.

ADR-related hospital admissions a significant burden

ADR-related hospital admissions a significant burden

ADR-related hospital admissions a significant burden

ADR-related hospital admissions a significant burden

ADR-related hospital admissions a significant burden

ADR-related hospital admissions a significant burden

Adverse drug reactions as cause of hospital admissions: results from the Italian Group of Pharmacoepidemiology in the Elderly (GIFA).

To determine the prevalence of adverse drug reaction (ADR)-related hospital admissions in an older population, to describe the most common clinical manifestations and drugs most frequently responsible for ADR-related hospital admissions, and to identify independent factors predictive of these ADRs. Multicenter pharmacoepidemiology survey conducted between 1988 and 1997. Eighty-one academic hospitals throughout Italy. Twenty-eight thousand four hundred eleven patients consecutively admitted to participating centers during the survey periods. For each suspected ADR at admission, a physician, who coded description, severity, and potentially responsible drugs, completed a questionnaire. Mean age +/- standard deviation of the patients was 70 +/- 16. One thousand seven hundred four ADRs were identified upon hospital admission. In 964 cases (3.4% of all admissions), ADRs were considered to be the cause of these hospital admissions. Of these, 187 ADRs were coded as severe. Gastrointestinal complaints (19%) represented the most common events, followed by metabolic and hemorrhagic complications (9%). The drugs most frequently responsible for these ADRs were diuretics, calcium channel blockers, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and digoxin. Female sex (odds ratio (OR) = 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.10-1.54), alcohol use (OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.20-1.60), and number of drugs (OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.20-1.27 for each drug increase) were independent predictors of ADR-related hospital admissions. For severe ADRs, age (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.01-2.23 for age 65-79 and OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.00-2.33 for age > or =80, respectively), comorbidity (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.05-1.20 for each point in the Charlson Comorbidity Index), and number of drugs (OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.11-1.25 for each drug increase) were the only predisposing factors. The most important determinant of risk for ADR-related hospital admissions in older patients is number of drugs being taken. When considering only severe ADRs, risk is also related to age and frailty.

Majority of ADR-related hospital admissions preventable

Majority of ADR-related hospital admissions preventable

Majority of ADR-related hospital admissions preventable

Majority of ADR-related hospital admissions preventable

Adverse drug reaction monitoring--cost and benefit considerations. Part I: frequency of adverse drug reactions causing hospital admissions.

In an era of health care cost containment it is of particular interest to identify measures that reduce costs and at the same time improve health care quality. One of these cost cutting measures might be the reduction of the frequency of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR). The objective of this paper is to summarize all original work on ADR frequencies at hospital admission and to come up with a valid estimate for the actual frequency of ADR-related hospital admissions. Additionally, we compared established concepts of ADR monitoring with respect to their utility for drug safety monitoring and pharmacoepidemiologic research. We reviewed 25 studies from the past 25 years. Analysing the effect of methodological characteristics showed that variation of reported ADR frequency mainly depends on differing study bases and the concepts of ADR monitoring. Investigations that thoroughly screened all members of the study population for the presence of adverse drug reactions (comprehensive ADR monitoring) generally yielded highest ADR proportions. Studies that concentrated screening on selected high-risk patients (preselective ADR monitoring) and those applying spontaneous or intensified spontaneous reporting detected lower ADR proportions (2.9% and 2.5%). The ADR proportion among admissions to departments of internal medicine was higher than among mixed hospital populations including surgical patients. In conclusion 4.2-6.0% (lower and upper quartile) and in median 5.8% of all admissions to medical departments are caused by adverse drug reactions. A two-step preselective ADR monitoring appears to be appropriate and efficient for both signal generation and signal validation as compared to spontaneous reporting and comprehensive monitoring. In conclusion, adverse drug reactions are a common cause of hospital admissions. As hospital care is expensive, attempts to prevent ADR and thus hospital admission need active encouragement.

Adverse reactions as a cause of hospital admission in the aged.

Truly elderly people comprise an increasingly large fraction of the population and consume a disproportionate amount of drugs. Over the last 25 years a number of different studies have illustrated that advancing age is associated with adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Advancing age is also associated with polypharmacy and multiple pathology, and this complex inter-relationship makes it difficult to conclude that age itself is a causative factor for ADRs. ADRs resulting in hospital admission have been the subject of study for many years, but it has not been consistently demonstrated that advancing age is a predisposing factor. Early studies used the method of intensive inpatient monitoring and identified digoxin, diuretics, aspirin, psychotropics and cytotoxics as drugs of concern. Smaller more recent studies have used more sophisticated statistical techniques to identify predisposing factors. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been added to the list of drugs that may cause ADR-related hospital admission. Polypharmacy, and altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are possible causative factors; however, variable compliance and multiple pathology may cause difficulties with attributing causality. Some basic guidelines for sensible prescribing would almost certainly result in fewer ADRs in the elderly, including those ADRs severe enough to result in hospital admission.

Prostatic contribution to normal serum acid phosphatase.

Total and tartrate-labile serum acid phosphatase levels were compared in patients with and without prostates, and in 12 patients before and after cystoprostatectomy. Absence of the prostate seems to make no significant difference to the levels of serum acid phosphatase. There is no justification for referring to the tartrate-labile serum acid phosphatase as "prostatic acid phosphatase." A substantial incidence of marginally raised levels of serum acid phosphatase in each group of patients suggests that the upper limit of normal for the total serum acid phosphatase should be taken as 5 K.A.u.